/jp/ - Otaku Culture

>We could have had some kind of blanket declaration that all characters are aged 18 or older, despite the incredibly clear context that she was not emotionally or physically an adult, ready to take on the complex challenges of sexual love with another human being. We could have changed every instance of "high school" to some nonexistent type of school that comes between high school and college. We might instead have removed all lines that refer to her being under the drinking age, which would (I think) have been a lot worse than the rather small changes we did make. In effect, we changed nothing important in the story at all -- the two fall in love but must wait for Matsuri to become old enough to decide if a sexual relationship is what she wants, which is what happens. However, we couldn't release the game with images of Matsuri in the nude when she was clearly not of age, so we made the alterations, which was done right before GM.

---

Didn't The Sagara Family had a loli where a recurring joke was that they couldn't mention her age or the main character could go to jail, and in one of the endings she gets several years of growth (getting some nice breasts after being a loli), and you fucked her many ways while she was clearly underaged based on the story, yet they were able to justify it with a blanket statement that all characters were over 18?

I really like this 18 year old, seeing that in one of her endings there is a time skip and she is no longer a loli.

>>1120893
that sucks, why didn't they just say she was 18?

age 18

>>712092

>>668130

>>602182