/jp/ - Otaku Culture

>>3459489
The fact that some questions that cannot be answered with our present means does not mean that they will always remain as such, as I pointed out indirectly in >>3459394

However, I do agree that a great deal of time and energy is currently wasted on tit for tats between theists and atheists. The theist statement "A creator exists" has no meaning, as they do not ascribe any properties to this creator-existence that might be tested. To clarify, I can theisticly state that "Xqujlxx exists," but so long as I don't give Xqujlxx any properties, that statement can never be proven or disproven as it is untestable.

It's even more pointless that pro-Skub vs anti-Skub, as Skub can at least be actively observed and thus tested.

A friend of mine says he wants to probe Skub's properties while being neutral.

I'm saying he's talking bullshit: you are either anti-skub, or anti-life.

Who's right?

I'll just leave this here, then.