/jp/ - Otaku Culture

Youmu is the cutest when she is an inexperienced rapist.

>>43867970
>yanderes
Don't bother, he's an idiot that will ruin the idea and make them outright kill or torture you with 0 warning or any other interactions. Same as everyone else on the western side. Seems like everyone just wants to suffer instead of making something people can get off to.
Our best hope is waiting for the japanese to come up with a passable system, but I don't have high hopes for them either. We'd have to wait for a 2hu vs 2hu danmaku system and probably a rework that would let 2hus stalk you anyway.

>>43572103
You're thinking about it from an existing dialogue perspective, not from a mechanic one. The dialogue comes from randoms all over the world, but it first needs to have "room" to accomodate what the writer wants to do. That's why I want it to have a bunch of options for a yandere mechanic, not a single "yandere" tag that makes them all act in exactly *one* way. A lot of writers would propably still skip the yan route(s), just like they do with sex friends in favor of pure love route(though I think an obsessive girl-initiated route would have more fans than the token slut route). It'll surely take time, years even before anyone can say "there's a good amount of yanderes in this game" but it'll at least be possible.
You talked about how yanderes would kidnap you and lock you up in a basement. Now take a step back and think about how much would it SUCK to be confined to a single room in a game like TW. It's already boring when you can't leave your map during a typhoon. It would just be an utterly dissapointing endeavor, and make people flip the yandere switch off after 3-4 days. EratohoReverse already exists, you know? I want to be able to embrace a yanhu's love, try to run away from it, have her stalk me, and have her fuming when she's ignored. New mechanics with a lot of options people can write for.

Give me a yandere update.

>>42594115
I wouldn't reach out to her, you might not get your hand back for a while.

>>12978584
That's not how you do it.