[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]

/jp/ - Otaku Culture

Search:

View post   
  [?]In ghost mode, only threads with non-archived posts will be shown
>> No.14563549 [View]
File: 270 KB, 786x468, tutorial.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14563549

>>14563545

>> No.14472425 [View]
File: 270 KB, 786x468, tutorial.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14472425

>>14472373
>>14472398
>>14472410
Long story short, people didn't read the tutorial carefully.

>> No.13942479 [View]
File: 270 KB, 786x468, tutorial.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13942479

>>13942435
It says that advancing on red carries the risk of sinking.

>>13942446
It was pretty rampant back in spring '13 or something. Extensive testing on sinking mechanics being done only after the game's been around for more than 3 months still tells you that all the players back then missed something. Not to mention that when anyone asked about sinking mechanics, the tutorial was never once mentioned.

And testing would have been simpler and its results more well-known if those who tested it actually read the tutorial to begin with.

>> No.13467016 [View]
File: 270 KB, 786x468, tutorial.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13467016

>>13466991
Which would never have occurred if people had read the tutorial a little more carefully.

>> No.13334855 [View]
File: 270 KB, 786x468, tutorial.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13334855

So did the nips ever comment on the part of the tutorial mentioning ship sinking mechanics?

>> No.13195202 [View]
File: 241 KB, 786x468, tuts.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13195202

>>13195113
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u4aoVVloUBE&t=143

The bottom disclaimer.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]