[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/ic/ - Artwork/Critique


View post   

File: 3.61 MB, 1605x1198, 04_Apricot.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4816668 No.4816668 [Reply] [Original]

Previous thread: >>4810919

Do Art Daily:
>Link: https://dad.gallery
>Discord: You must have a DAD streak of at least 14 to join. Ask Vastian#0988 for an invite.
>Found an issue with the site? Lost your streak and want to appeal? Please message the contact link at the bottom of the site, not the thread.

Rules:
>Draw every day (or your preferred frequency)
>Submit your work by 23:59:59 GMT
>Spend at least 30 minutes on each submission
>No loli or shota porn
>Miss a day and you'll be alright, just keep going
>Have fun

Please comment on each other's artwork; dads love attention!

FAQ:

What is the goal?
>To become better.

me is beginner and not know draw, can me join?
>Yes x100. Stop asking and start submitting art, chum. You can't be the worst, like literally.

A brief history:
>Last Artist Standing (LAS): The original site, created by Lava (presumed dead, rest in peace). It has changed and ruined the lives of many lassies. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=epg08FlksTc
>Draw Every Day (DED): A short-lived site between LAS and DAD, run and abruptly cancelled by w.
>Do Art Daily (DAD): The current site, by the dadmin and developer banana.


Community links:
>DADcast: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCfCw_buGoBDPQC1bbcukmnQ
>DADcast latest episode (Ep. 3 - Wolfens): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zkZnRdLRJs8
>LAS discord (not to be confused with the official DAD discord): Invitations are open for 48 hours on the 1st and 15th of every month. Invitations are not currently open.

>> No.4816681

First for lolis.

>> No.4816687

>>4816668
good fox good op

>> No.4816688
File: 71 KB, 400x400, duarte.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4816688

The user of the day is... duarte!
https://dad.gallery/users/1974
Say something about art made by this user.

>> No.4816691

>>4816688
god i wish i got a comment from auto

>> No.4816694

>>4816691
god I wish I got a comment

>> No.4816697

god I wish I'm a comment

>> No.4816708
File: 184 KB, 1259x769, dad.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4816708

>>4816688
pic related is a very comfy painting indeed.
seems like you are struggling a bit with drawing. do take your time to measure more, your faces lowkey need loomis every now and then. flip your canvas while drawing. you seem very dedicated, even finished the 30 day facial expression challenge, good job and keep practicing.

>> No.4816709

I wish I was brave enough to join the DAD lads.

>> No.4816717

>>4816668
You did specially good with the title text this time, Shriney, this is impressive

>>4816709
Join, don't be silly, it will help you a lot!

>> No.4816755
File: 79 KB, 558x496, A9E27A3B-419C-49F0-90ED-150F41F48C0A.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4816755

>>4816668

>> No.4816815

>>4816688
Nice brushes give me your brushes please.

>> No.4816819

>>4816815
hard round brush

>> No.4816826

>>4816819
Thank you Duterte, as always you are the man of the situation.

>> No.4816850

>>4816819
Suck my hard round, fagget

>> No.4816877

>>4816819
That's the worst, most harmful meme /ic/ ever came up with.

>> No.4816888

>>4816877
Except it's not

>> No.4816895

>>4816877
If ic came up with it why did my teacher in digital painting class make everyone do exercises with only the hard round? Fucking idiot.

>> No.4816905

>>4816877
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Nt9fa8jZUE

>> No.4816916

>>4816888
Go look at few last featured dads. The best ones kept using stylized brushes. Professional concept artist use them for everything: trees, people, textures, chains. /ic/ makes it look like hard round is good for everything, which it is not.

>>4816895
>Fucking idiot.
Why yes, I am fucking your mother. How did you know?

>>4816905
If you actually watched that video, then you'd know that hard round is recommended for beginners as a learning tool. He never claimed it was the best brush for making finished artwork, which this "hard round brush" meme suggests.

>> No.4816918

>>4816916
hard round brush
https://www.angelarium.net/

>> No.4816919

>>4816877
imo it's mostly a jab at those who think a special brush can magically fix their art skills although customize brushes can still make your work look better if you know how to use it

>> No.4816921

>>4816916
Hard round brush meme is response to begginer digital artist asking how to render shit.

>> No.4816925

>>4816916
It is good for everything, you can paint anything with it the same way you can with trad

>> No.4816929

>>4816925
>I don't care about being efficient
NGMI

>> No.4816935

>>4816929
If I can get my work done before deadlines using just one brush I do it, simple as that

>> No.4816945

If the brush is textured then it does the work for you. Good if you want something finished. Bad if you want to learn how to render.

>> No.4816951

>>4816945
texture layer exists

>> No.4816953

Because of this dumb meme /int/s that want to speed up with better brushes are ridiculed. It forces them to make their own instead of just sharing someone's cool brushes. Moreover it gives the wrong idea to low /int/s who may be hesitant to even try and experiment with those.

>> No.4816955

still gonna use textured brushes they are fun

>> No.4816956

>>4816953
you speedup your work with accuracy, mileage and workflow as ints

>> No.4816957

>>4816956
Experimentation with new techniques is just as important.

>> No.4816961

>>4816953
Who's ridiculing you? There's fuck tons of custom brushes in CSP that's freely accessible in the assets store. Who cares what random anon thinks about your textured brushes.

>>4816955
same ţbh

>> No.4816964

>>4816957
mileage

>> No.4816965

>>4816961
brushes are like gloves - they only fit the person who made them

>> No.4816966

I hate dad because I can't delete submissions.

>> No.4816968

>>4816965
that is the most retarded shit I have read today

>> No.4816971

>>4816968
funny, your moms text message was even more retarded

>> No.4816973

>>4816971
>hurr your mom joke
cringe

>> No.4816974

>>4816968
this is the most retarded shit I have read this week

>> No.4816976

>>4816971
based

>> No.4816977

>>4816974
You don't read much. I bet you go the library to sleep.

>> No.4816979

>>4816966
just write banane you want it deleted.

>> No.4816982

>>4816979
Why not just make it a site feature? Or make it so you could set submissions to private at least.

>> No.4816984

>>4816977
>I bet you go the library to sleep.
this tops the retarded comment of the week

>> No.4816985

>>4816982
no idea. I would like that too. I dont want to write to banana when I decide to nuke my account

>> No.4816987

>>4816982
I already downloaded all relevant dads submissions ahead of time. Especially the female dads.

>> No.4816988

>>4816918
praise the all powerful HRB!

>> No.4816994

>>4816987
names

>> No.4817008

>>4816994
you!

>> No.4817011

>>4817008
noooooooooooooooooooo

>> No.4817014

>>4816965
that's like your opinion mang good for you for having an opinion

>> No.4817017

Leave me and my penis brush alone

>> No.4817020

>>4817017
ok faggot

>> No.4817024

>>4817020
show me where the penis brush touched you

>> No.4817025

>>4817017
>hard penis brush

>> No.4817037

>>4817024
in my ear daddy, fuck me in my ear hard oooh yasss, that, right there, yeah yeah, that feels so good, im gonna cummm, oooooooh

>> No.4817089

>furry and loli generals on /ic/

this destroys the /dad/

>> No.4817091

>>4816688
>with each new day, featured dads get less and less replies
Why?

>> No.4817099

>>4817091
only boomers do /dad/s, learn to read the room old man

>> No.4817114

God I wish someone would do ME!

>> No.4817120
File: 189 KB, 809x960, 775050_586647048017401_1297429562_o.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4817120

>>4817017
Based
Dave Rapoza once painted a portrait only with a dick brush.

>> No.4817182

>>4817091
there is nothing to say about his stuff.

>> No.4817186

Hard round brush challenge

>> No.4817205

>>4817186
Do it

>> No.4817261
File: 135 KB, 1147x1143, duarte sandstorm.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4817261

>>4817182
That sounds a bit like an excuse; he isn't on a level where there's nothing to criticize.

>>4816688
Your traditional stuff is significantly worse than your digital. Train more with real ink. That should help you with getting out of this bad habit of fixing your art until it looks OK; don't keep fixing your art, do it right from beginning. This approach is much more intense and harder, but it will really pay off.
And do more skull studies - I feel that when you do your portraits you're focused more on just copying what you see rather than analysing underlying structures and forms.

>> No.4817364
File: 155 KB, 832x992, 1563561387941.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4817364

>>4817186
literally every submission I make

>> No.4817434

>>4817182
Why do you think so?

>> No.4817453

>>4817261
>>4817434
its just boring

>> No.4817481

Uhm, I’m starting to think pera legitimately has child pornography

>> No.4817482

>>4817481
same it's kinda disgusting seeing someone who draws lolishit paint real children

>> No.4817485

>>4817481
>just starting to think this
It’s actually really disturbing.
But he’s technically not breaking any rules so it is what it is.

>> No.4817494

>>4817481
https://dad.gallery/submissions/77835
Pera's got balls.

>> No.4817515

>>4817494
Vani confirmed for nasty pedophile

>> No.4817522

>>4817494

I admire his portraits and this one especially is pleasing.

Jake - State Farm CSR

>> No.4817523

>>4817515
Holy shit poor vani doesn't know...

>> No.4817524

>>4817523
>>4817515
who is vani

>> No.4817525

>>4817524
go to the link and scroll down

>> No.4817528

>>4817525
dont get how this has anything to do with pera who drew real loliporn

>> No.4817529

>>4817525
don't do this it downloads cp to your computer

>> No.4817535
File: 278 KB, 800x600, 1597234724571.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4817535

>>4817364
This but i'm being completely serious

>> No.4817553

>>4817528
vani is an innocent young woman who just saw that child portrait and thought "what a precious child"
meanwhile pera only painted it because he wants to fuck underages.
>>4817528
>real loliporn
those portraits aren't loliporn fyi.
he still hasn't broken any rules.

>> No.4817562

>>4817553
I am talking about the loliporn he drew and got deleted. the point is it's nasty seeing a pedo paint real children.

>> No.4817563

ban pera for promoting child abuse

>> No.4817567

>>4817563
this but ironically

>> No.4817569

Pera is a fucking disgusting individual

>> No.4817573

>>4817481
i know the other anons are just shitposting but it legitimately freaks me out.

>> No.4817577

Fucking gross. Where's the block user feature?

>> No.4817581

>>4817573
I am not. I honestly think it's weird.

>> No.4817582

>>4817573
I am not shitposting if that helps you

>> No.4817587

>>4817573
I don't play around with this kind of stuff

>> No.4817589

>>4817573
I take this very seriously

>> No.4817590

one of these days he's going to paint a nude, realistic child

>> No.4817592

>>4817590
he probably does but doesnt post it

>> No.4817594

>>4817590
he already did and got his ass warned by moderators

>> No.4817596

does pera post here?

>> No.4817598

>>4817592
Imagine his realistic paintings and then he paints all that c*m all over just like he did with the anime girl he did a few posts ago. Just thinking about that makes my cock har--

>> No.4817608

>>4817590
Don't even joke about it

>> No.4817610

Ban pera. Fucking disgusting pedophile

>> No.4817612

What do mods think about it?

>> No.4817613

next submission he has a portrait of a realistic ****g girls mouth open with questionable but totally not ban worthy substance inside

please pera

>> No.4817616

>>4817612
Mods don’t care about him being an actual pedo because his art is “good”

>> No.4817619

>>4817616
>tfw he wasnt banned for his shitty lolicon porn art
wtf

>> No.4817620

>>4817619
rules for thee but not for me and my friends

>> No.4817625

rules for thee but not for me
rules for thee but not for me
rules for thee but not for me

>> No.4817626

>>4817620
the submission was removed and he didn't throw a fit
NEXT

>> No.4817633

>>4817626
How do you know he wasn't ITT savoring the disturbed souls? How do you know he's not here right now...?

>> No.4817635

>>4817626
why not a ban

>> No.4817636

>>4817633
That doesn't have anything to do with him actually not breaking the rules of dad.gallery
NEXT

>> No.4817638

speak up pera

>> No.4817640

>>4817638
I love little girls

>> No.4817643

>>4817596
>>4817636

He does post here you nimrods. He was named USAUSA before

>>/ic/thread/S3604757#p3610694

evidence of a convo chain here

>> No.4817647

>>4817643
the fuck is this shit

>> No.4817649

>>4817647
the english language

>> No.4817650

Pera won’t get banned because people are afraid to speak up in the discord

>> No.4817652

>>4817643
Again, him posting on 4chan has nothing to do with him deserving to be banned. He got a warning and accepted it, didn't sperg out over it unlike others.
NEXT

>> No.4817658

>>4817652

What's wrong, Peria Chronicles? You don't have to be afraid of a ban because you're better than most people on DAD. Rules only apply to people who aren't high skilled.

>> No.4817660

>>4817652
You absolute moron. He deserves a ban because he’s a pedo not because he posts on 4chan you fucking retard

>> No.4817662

>>4817652
he should have been banned for the loliart

>> No.4817663

>>4817660
Child portraits aren't loliporn.
NEXT

>> No.4817665

>>4817660
Nothing wrong with being a pedophile. It's just he shouldn't be allowed get out of jail cards just because.

>> No.4817667

Literally the Epstien of /dad/. Guess this is what you can get away with if you're just too damn good.

>> No.4817669

For real, why are you faggots arguing for a one strike ban?
Do you realize how retarded that is?

>> No.4817671

>>4817643
Stalker.

>> No.4817673

>>4817662
Absolutely. Mods are a disgrace. To so willingly allow an actual pedophile who draws realistic portraits of actual fucking kids is sick. Either a mod is also a pedo or they’re buddies with pera.

>> No.4817675

>>4817669
I guess
>no tolerance
applies for thee only

>> No.4817676

>>4817669
loli should not be tolerated

>> No.4817677

pera is still cool in my book unlike that dangerous unhinged sperg lilramune who couldn't stop himself from being a kazoo orbiter

>> No.4817679

>>4817677
yeah guess who's throwing the shit fit right now

>> No.4817680

>>4817676
Gray areas man.
Didn't tsflipp get warned twice for questionable loli/shota?

>> No.4817681

>>4817677
dont change the subject, pera

>> No.4817682

>>4817679
i think he tried to dm hoppy for pics too, what a creep

>> No.4817684

>>4817682
Wow really? Why isn't he in jail?

>> No.4817686

>>4817677
Fuck off. All pedos deserve the rope. Good art isn’t an excuse.

>> No.4817688

https://www.strawpoll.me/20823420

>> No.4817690

I agree with Cath but I am too new to speak up on the discord.

>> No.4817691

>>4817686

I agree and dogfuckers should hang with them.

>> No.4817694

Based Cath doing the lord’s work

>> No.4817697

>>4817691
Based, but too based, the furfags have too much power rn brother, let's settle with getting rid of the pedo first.

>> No.4817698

Based Cath.

>> No.4817699

>>4817697

As a fellow pedo I agree. A temporary truce then we'll hang you later.

>> No.4817700

I agree with Cath in dadcord.

>> No.4817701

I also think it's highly disturbing but again, he's not breaking any rules by posting those portraits so on what grounds do you even have to ban him?
None? Okay then just ignore him.

>> No.4817705

>>4817701
He should have just been banned for the lolishit the first time he posted it. Fuck that shit is nasty and I hate that it just gets a warning.

>> No.4817707

what did cath say?

>> No.4817709

>>4817700
What’s he saying? For those of us not in the discord

>> No.4817710

I'm not in the dadcord, but yeah this shit is kind of disgusting.

>> No.4817711

post discord screencaps

>> No.4817713

Pedo apologist mods will be the downfall of DAD

>> No.4817714

pera didn't do nothing wrong, until he creates an account specifically simping around my dad crush he should go unpunished

>> No.4817716

>29 posters
>147 posts
hmmm and considering I post on 3 devices (not at once) that's actually25 ips

>> No.4817720

You can only reply to this post if June is better than you.

>> No.4817721

>>4817716

I'm posting on two devices....

>> No.4817725

Wtf why is pera not banned yet

>> No.4817728

>>4817721
so 20 unique IPs

know what? I think a lot of people here post on mobile after they leave the house so let's make that 15 people ITT right now

>> No.4817730

>>4817705
>Fuck that shit is nasty and I hate that it just gets a warning.
You are being guided by your emotions.
People draw lolishit all the time. It's a rule on dad not to post it, pera fucked up and got a warning and hasn't posted anything bannable since. Case closed. Get over it and just don't associate with him if he disturbs you.

>> No.4817733

>>4817730
doesnt change that its disgusting

>> No.4817734

If I'm being honest when I joined I didn't know if everyone in DAD were pedos since no one seemed to be saying anything about the obvious pedo that kept posting little girl portraits.

>> No.4817737

>>4817730
Oh fuck off. We shouldn’t allow a pedo, even if he doesn’t post loli anymore.

>> No.4817738

>>4817730
i don't give a fuck. pedos should burn in hell

>> No.4817740
File: 18 KB, 1553x195, based.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4817740

Pera is based.
Moral police can fuck off.

>> No.4817743

>>4817734
Nobody says anything to him because he's god in terms of the ratio to skill of users.

>> No.4817744

>>4817734
One of the mods has to be a pedo to allow this to go on so long. It’s sickening.

>> No.4817745

>>4817730
can you draw sfw loli/kids?

>> No.4817746

Yeah. It's best to get rid of him. We don't want to give a bad impression to newcomers like >>4817734 shows

>> No.4817747

>>4817740
LOLICHAD

>> No.4817749

>>4817738
Okay good luck starting with some rando on dad.gallery who posted some non-lewd portraits of a child.

>> No.4817750

>>4817740
t. Pedo Pera.

>> No.4817752

>>4817740
Based Chad.

>> No.4817753

>>4817740
“I exploit children but its cool because I don’t have a moral compass”

>> No.4817754

>>4817740
>The virgin pera
>The chad Cath

>> No.4817755

the virgin lilramune vs the chad pera

>> No.4817756

>>4817746
Except newcomers will just see the portraits as a portrait and not loliporn because that's what they are, portraits.

>> No.4817757

>>4817745
if you call a child a loli you have no right to draw children

>> No.4817760

>>4817734
I thought the same thing desu it’s creepy his fixation on kids even if it’s non sexual

>> No.4817761

the small cock cath
the dragon penius pera

>> No.4817762

>>4817756
who tf draws portraits of children if they're not a pedo

>> No.4817763

>>4817753
Show me where he is exploiting children, go on. I'm waiting.
I'd love to see you try to argue with a court of law over this shit.

>> No.4817764

>>4817740
I’m not a fan of the lolishit he draws, but I gotta admit he’s based for saying that especially at a time like this

>> No.4817765

>>4817764
He's just coping. How is that based?

>> No.4817766

the lowly defeated, trembling in fear cath
the highly esteemed, Lord of Chaos pera

>> No.4817767

someone screencap the discord for us

>> No.4817768

>>4817757
ok then, i'll start drawing safe lolis

>> No.4817770

So vani is a pedo apologist? That’s a shame

>> No.4817771

>>4817762
Me!

>> No.4817772

>>4817766
stop idolizing child molesters, aphid

>> No.4817773

>>4817756
Believe me, when I went to his profile, day 1, it was pretty clear to me that he was a pedo making portraits because he wants to eventually paint realistic loli porn.

>> No.4817774

>>4817768
Loli has always been okay on dad so as long as you clothe them.

>> No.4817778

Of course the pedo tries to excuse his behavior

>> No.4817779

>>4817778
Kneel before the Loli king, vermin. /dad/ belongs to users of true prestige.

>> No.4817780

>>4817767
there is nothing to screencap. cath just said its disgusting and bob and jason agreed

>> No.4817782

>>4817780
bob and jason are based

>> No.4817783
File: 16 KB, 288x404, GV2526_DVD_Cover-2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4817783

How do you mentally ill people associate children portraits with pedophilia?
In that case, why not ban everyone who advocates for Vilppu since he published a video course on how to draw children.

>> No.4817784

>>4817780
So bob and jason are "yes" men who wouldn't mind flying down on cath's zipper. Good to know.

>> No.4817786

tfw when you want to call out Pera in the comments to help Based Cath but you are too afraid that some of the mods may be pedos and will have a vendetta against you from now on.

>> No.4817787

>>4817780
I always knew bob was one of the good guys

>> No.4817788

pera proud pure blooded lolisaiyan standing up against mind controlled sjw androids who can't handle portraits of utmost technique

>> No.4817789

>>4817780
Just screencap so everyone shuts up

>> No.4817792

>>4817783
it really depends the person

i mean a pedo who draws loli children being fucked
starts drawing portraits of children

>> No.4817794

>>4817783
he drew pedoshit before. lolifag drawing children is just nasty

>> No.4817796

>>4817792

You're just jealous his child portraits look more pretty than your FBI portait, femdad.

>> No.4817797

>>4817783
Pera drew actual CP you loon. It’s fucking creepy that he draws tons and tons of children now. He’s a proven pedo who now creeps on real children.

>> No.4817798

How long before the dbz subhuman shows up?

>> No.4817799

Vastian BASED

>> No.4817800

Kneel

>> No.4817801

>>4817783
Pera drew CP you idiot

>> No.4817802

>>4817794
>>4817792
>Trying to reason with the pedo defender
He's a pedo too you know?

>> No.4817803

>>4817799
Screencaps

>> No.4817805

Beg for forgiveness you losers hahahah!

>> No.4817806
File: 42 KB, 495x331, based.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4817806

>>4817803

>> No.4817808

SCREENCAPS

>> No.4817809
File: 581 KB, 1020x510, inspiration 13.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4817809

>tfw you just want to find a community where people draw because they like it, but you just keep finding communities where people draw to eventually draw cp.

>> No.4817812

>>4817806
>another warning

you people are a joke

agian

>rules for thee but not for me and my friends

>> No.4817813

>>4817809
thankfully there are lots of artist who just draw what they like but the lolishit just irks me a lot too

>> No.4817814

>>4817806
Vastian makes a decent point actually...
if you look at his submissions singularly a couple portraits of underages isn't exactly questionable, but when you encapsulate them with his entire gallery of explicit material it gets more iffy.
I still don't think it's a bannable offense, what exactly would the new clause in dad's rules be? You can't post underage portraits if your gallery is more than half explicit material?

>> No.4817815

>>4817786
The mods will protect you. No worries.

>> No.4817816

>>4817806
Fuck yeah. Get his ass, vastian.

>> No.4817818

We should ban Wolf too considering what he's drawn in the past.

>> No.4817819

>>4817814
why not? seeing his gallery made me want to delete my dad account because I dont want my art to be associated with people who post that kind of shit

>> No.4817821

>>4817818
like what

>> No.4817822

>>4817818
Wolf doesn't draw cp.

>> No.4817827

>>4817819

Just delete your account then. We don't need faggots like you. Remember where you are.

>> No.4817828

>>4817818
what did wolf do

>> No.4817830

>>4817827
Fuck off pera.

>> No.4817831

all this Pera/Cath drama is somewhat more entertaining than the twitter threads, even tho it's just as equally retarded

>> No.4817832

>>4817827
I know where I am and I dont pretend to like loligarbage to fit in. Fuck off I am here for over 10 years. Lolifaggots are the worst.

>> No.4817835

>>4817828
cp and guro

>> No.4817837

>>4817835
Proof?

>> No.4817838

>>4817819
Because if it disturbs you that much you can just leave the site.
Unless there is an updated rule about what is permissible on the site, he again has not explicitly broken any rule.
A website's rulebook is just a microcosmic court of law, and right now there is only accusations and a questionable past being flung around, that's not enough for the death penalty.

>> No.4817841

>>4817832

you sound like a woman

>> No.4817842

I like this episode

>> No.4817844

>>4817841
k

>> No.4817845

its kinda interesting because Pera has been posting kid portraits for a while now- but there's something specific about this current one that just skeeves me out. I can't put my finger on it though

>> No.4817846

>>4817838
Why are you defending him? Are you a pedo sympathizer? Rules can be updated and he can get retroactively banned.

>> No.4817852

>>4817837
Ask him about it, he used to spam it on the lascord a few years ago.

>> No.4817854

>>4817841
You sound like a pedo. Why are you so obsessed with allowing child pornography?

>> No.4817856

>>4817846

Is that why there is still no Terms and Conditions page after 3 years? You know legally Pera can sue, right?

>> No.4817861

>>4817835
what's wrong with guro? cp is certainly sufficient to justify a ban, but not guro

>> No.4817864

>>4817856
Those scare tactics won't work.

>> No.4817865

>>4817856
FOH just admit you’re a pedo and name yourself

>> No.4817867

>>4817856
>You know legally Pera can sue, right?
do it I'll wait

>> No.4817869

>>4817846
>Rules can be updated and he can get retroactively banned.
If the mods do this then fine, but it's up to them to decide how to actually coherently make this case in their favor, and at the moment, I don't see them having much of a basis.

>> No.4817870

>>4817861
We're talking guro cp, buddy

>> No.4817873

>>4817806
Slightly based but why not just ban him and be done with it? Nothing of value will be lost

>> No.4817875

>>4817870
Stop making shit about wolfens, stupid pedo

>> No.4817877

>>4817186
nice

>> No.4817878

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HK2VLhbSaoc

>> No.4817879

>>4817873
he's one of the few decent artist among a sea of /beg/s

>> No.4817882

>>4817879
Who the hell cares? It’s just a daily art site who cares if we lose a good one? Good art means nothing if the artist wants to fuck kids

>> No.4817887

>>4817878
kek

>> No.4817888

>>4817875
Sure thing pedo Patrick

>> No.4817890
File: 130 KB, 1026x840, bananaspeaks.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4817890

>> No.4817891

>>4817879
Beginners are better than him solely for the fact of not being a filthy pedophile. Nobody will miss him

>> No.4817893

>>4817890
Good
I agree with banana

>> No.4817894

>>4817890
Why are there two the1bananas?

>> No.4817896

>>4817856
Why didn't ramune sue when he had the chance? He had a good case.

>> No.4817900

hide user feature WHEN

>>4817894
the yellow one is the real one the other is jason

>> No.4817903

>>4817890
I fucking KNEW banana was a pedo

>> No.4817905

>>4817894
yellow name is real nana, white name is jason

>> No.4817906

>>4817890
wtf is banana doing?

>> No.4817909

>>4817890
>>4817900
>>4817905
chad jason
pedo banana

>> No.4817911

>>4817906
He’s allowing a pedo to sexualize REAL CHILDREN because he doesn’t want to do his job.

>> No.4817912

>>4817906
Being an actual moderator not ruling with his emotions

>> No.4817914

>>4817890
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YmYPxdQpwpQ

>Is there nothing else we can do furchads?
>....

>> No.4817917

>>4817890
konsui lowkey based

>> No.4817918

>>4817911

If you see that portrait as sexual then you're the real pedophile here.

>> No.4817920

>>4817911
I think as a site admin its hard for him to decide what to do right now, pera didnt go against any rules currently so there is no reason to ban but I agree with everyone peras shit is disgusting.

>> No.4817925

>>4817890
Welp that’s a great reason for any new potential dads to not join.

>> No.4817929

>>4817918
>Acting like you don't know what he's doing.

>> No.4817933

>>4817890
Any more screencaps?

>> No.4817934

>>4817920
This.
Does it feel kind of gross ultimately arguing for a *probable* pedophile? Yeah. But it's just that, probable.
We have no means to ban him.
End of story guys.

>> No.4817935

>>4817925
I was planning on joining soon but now I'm not so sure seeing how they let a pedophile go free like that

>> No.4817936

>>4817933
No it's over for now go home and start drawing

>> No.4817941

>>4817935
Yeah I regret joining.


How do I have my account scrubbed? I want nothing to do with that shit and certainly don’t want to be associated with it.

>> No.4817942

>>4817936
no

>> No.4817945

>>4817941
write to banana

>> No.4817946

>>4817941
email banana
bye

>> No.4817947

>>4817941
Email or DM banana.

>> No.4817949

What rules? There are none on the site. There is no tab to view rules, no link, nothing. It's all made up.

>> No.4817951

>>4817941
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B8eTxPdU4sQ

>> No.4817952

>>4817945
>>4817946
What's his mail?

>> No.4817953

>>4817941
email banana, good riddance

>> No.4817955

>>4817952
there's a contact link on the website

>> No.4817956

>>4817945
>>4817946
Ty what’s the email

>> No.4817957

>>4817955
Thank you

>> No.4817958

>>4817956
just email him, tell him that you want your profile deleted

>> No.4817963

>>4817890
For me it's Konsui 2020.

>> No.4817964

I hope banana's happy

>> No.4817966

>>4817956
bottom of the site, contact

>> No.4817967

>>4817890
So this is /dad/cord, huh. Looks like stage 4 cancer.

>> No.4817968

So Tribunal is a Cancel button?

>> No.4817969

>>4817964
He’s content as long as his precious pedo is okay

>> No.4817971

>>4817968
It's a feature to get rid of people you don't like.

>> No.4817974

>>4817969
banana is a low key pedo and only pretending to be a furry to uphold LAS tradition (lemur)

>> No.4817975

>>4817968
If someone exploiting real children like pera isn’t enough to get removed then wtf is it even for

>> No.4817976

So how many cp pictures do you guys think Pera has done for banana?

>> No.4817977

>>4817969
I don't understand how banana could defend a pedo. I'm disappointed.

>> No.4817978

>>4817949
https://dad.gallery/help

>> No.4817980

>>4817977
Upholding site rules =/= defending a pedophile

You people are braindead

>> No.4817982

>>4817978
That can only be viewed when logged in. Very poor user friendly web design.

>> No.4817983

>>4817453
And that's a very valuable feedback. If I were drawing boring pictures I'd want someone to tell me that.

>> No.4817986

>>4817980
I think a lot of this willful misunderstanding is threadshitters t bh

>> No.4817988

>>4817980
Banana is the one that makes the rules. If the rules defend the pedo that makes a pedo enabler

>> No.4817992

>>4817988
makes him*

>> No.4817998

>>4817988
Again, point me to clear evidence the portraits that you are implying to be the means of a bannable offense unyieldingly prove he is a pedophile. Waiting.

>> No.4818000

I'm getting severe deja vu....like I seen this before?

>> No.4818001

lilramune whats your opinion on the matter

>> No.4818006

>>4817982
If you're not using the site why are you here

>> No.4818011

>>4816708
thank you for the crit anon, i am definitely struggling with drawing at the moment, I've been practising faces a lot recently to get better at measuring
>>4816815
they're from a pack here on /ic/, Kyle's, Shiyoon Inkbrush, Yiz Heng. but i think i'm not at the level to be using them yet, so HRB
>>4817261
>this bad habit of fixing your art until it looks OK; don't keep fixing your art, do it right from beginning.
yeah that's me nailed, I'm always rushing through the initial sketch and painting the turd rather than fixing it. this is helpful, thank you anon

>> No.4818012

>>4818006

i was considering on signing up but not after this fiasco

>> No.4818017

>>4818012
k bye

>> No.4818022
File: 46 KB, 1603x144, perabox.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4818022

based and dropbox pilled

>> No.4818023

>>4818012
I was about to join dad and personally mail every active user a check for 3 grand as well as connect them with their idols for personalized mentorships but after this fiasco I've decided against it

>> No.4818026

>>4818022
how can one lolichad be so based

>> No.4818036

>>4818026
he's not a lolichad
just a straight up chad

>> No.4818045

>>4817740
man cath got absolutely destroyed

>> No.4818049

DAD isn’t the community it tries to present itself as. It’s hilarious that y’all can’t get control over one single kiddie diddler.

>> No.4818052

>>4818049
>DAD isn’t the community it tries to present itself as
And what is that exactly

>> No.4818061

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cOlNHXQCT_4

>> No.4818066
File: 5 KB, 832x79, cath.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4818066

Cath is such a faggot holy shit. And vani deleted his comment lol

>> No.4818068

Those are difficult times for Pera, either defend his honor samefagging this thread, or keep drawing more kids.

>> No.4818069

>>4818066
what did vani comment

>> No.4818074

>>4818066
Cath is BASED pedos BTFO

>> No.4818075

>>4818066
Cath is based, Pera is too much of a pussy to own the fact that he's a pedo.

>> No.4818076

>>4818069
"She's gorgeous"

>> No.4818079

>>4818069
"I'd fuck that"

>> No.4818080

>>4818069
Vani said it was good looking or something similar

>> No.4818084

>>4818075
True pera comes off as insecure and whiny exactly how I picture a skeezy kiddy diddler would

>> No.4818088

>>4818066
LOL that was based

>> No.4818095

>>4818011
Thanks I'll try those!

>> No.4818098

>>4818066

harassment is against the rules

>> No.4818102

Isn't it illegal to use kid's pics without permission?

>> No.4818106

>>4818102
Do you think a pedo cares about that

>> No.4818109

>>4816688
I can see a clear improvement, it's a good thing he's project oriented

>> No.4818111

There should be a shadowban feature where either someone's pics don't show up or when people comment the pedo doesn't see their comments so they don't get that attention they so desperately seek

>> No.4818112

>>4818098
Rules for thee but not for me and my friends.

>> No.4818113

>>4818102
it is. 5 years jail, no trial

>> No.4818114

>>4818098
BAN CATH

>> No.4818118

>>4818102
Does pera live outside the US? It may be illegal and could be reported by DAD site admins. But they don’t care about a literal pedo who makes cp so I doubt they do anything

>> No.4818119

>>4818114
No seriously, he's harassing after the thing was let go and nobody will say shit because he's the comment whore who gives everyone comments.

>> No.4818120
File: 8 KB, 224x225, 15965686464.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4818120

>>4818022
>doing the natalie portman one
>if it continues i will leave
pera is either baiting you all, quite successfully nonetheless or he's actually legit autistic

>> No.4818123

kill that nigger pera. fucking piece of pedoshit. of course he's proud of that fact, as all pedos are. i'd say ban him repeatedly for existing but banana is being a virgin moralfag cuck.

>> No.4818124

What's wrong with drawing portrait of a little girl? It is one of the most common request you can have from internet grannys (right after drawing their shitty tiny dog).

>> No.4818127

>>4818119
Calm down Pera, Jesus.

>> No.4818130

>>4818124
He made actual CP and posted it. It was removed and now he draws real children constantly

>> No.4818131

>>4818124
Yeah I'm sure the guy who posted loli porn a few days ago is using it exactly for that, and definitely isn't planning in drawing realistic pedo shit.

>> No.4818134

why's this general so obsessed with pedos

>> No.4818141

I want you to take a good look at this very moment while this is still fresh in your minds.

Take a good look at the lies >>4818130
No CP was posted, it was an anime piece.

But, if you say a lie long enough it becomes truth.

>> No.4818146

>>4818134
The real question is why are pedos so obsessed with little girls, is it the traumatic experience of being brutally, anally raped by their uncle when they were young?

>> No.4818148

>>4818141
Drawn child pornography is still child pornography you shithead

>> No.4818153

>>4818148
you haven't seen real child porno yet then if you think drawn cp is cp
>inb4 how do you know

don't worry about it

>> No.4818156

>>4818153
t. Pera.

>> No.4818157

I wonder why you people are so harsh on him.

What does drawing loli hentai, IE underaged girls -anime style- having sex, have to do with starting to draw lots of little girls realistic portraits?

I just can't see it. Honest.

>> No.4818158

>>4818153
You’re depraved

>> No.4818159

pera a good boi

>> No.4818161

>>4818141
loliporn is quite the same
Stylization doesn't make it better
but yeah ok, what do we do if he ever uploads real cp?

>> No.4818164

>>4818157
You’re brain dead.

>> No.4818167

>>4818161
>but yeah ok, what do we do if he ever uploads real cp?

he won't, you're just looking for drama

>> No.4818171
File: 365 KB, 439x549, 3svJvIh.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4818171

>visit thread
>total drama shitshow
>people getting furiously angry over pic
>meanwhile there's literal porn involving furry shotas and furry lolis being posted near daily with no discontent
>but that's different
this place is a joke

>> No.4818174

>>4818171
>literal porn involving furry shotas and furry lolis being posted near daily
Come back to reality anon.

>> No.4818176

>>4818171
rules for thee not not for fur-ree

>> No.4818178

>>4818171
>there's literal porn involving furry shotas and furry lolis being posted
share it

>> No.4818180

I want to see pera quit dad, but only because he doesn't deserve being treated like this.

>> No.4818182

>>4818180
ok pera

>> No.4818190

The user of the day is... pera!
https://dad.gallery/users/1337
Say something about art made by this user.

>> No.4818191

>>4818180
He doesn't have the balls to do it.

>> No.4818192

>>4818180
Rope yourself pedo

>> No.4818193

>>4818190
kek

>> No.4818196

>>4818171
>enter pera
>draw loliporn
>get warned and not banned even though he broke the rules
>starts drawing children
>anons get rightfully pissed
>"No Gaise is totally innocent is just a drawing stop talking about it ignore the other things!!!11!"
What are you faggots even trying to accomplish with this?

>> No.4818198

How do I get as good as pera?

>> No.4818199

>>4818190
Peda.

>> No.4818200

>>4818171
there is nothing offensive about mickey mouse taking a 80 pound dragon cock. that does not compare to liking real little girls (zoophilia is awful but pedophilia is way fucking worse retard). drawing lolshit and then little girl portraits lead me to a high suspicion that pera is a pedo. you are in flat out denial or just trolling.

>> No.4818201

>>4818198
Become a pedophile.

>> No.4818202

>>4818198
Do studies, because in every drawing he has done that isn't a study looks bad.

>> No.4818203

>>4818196
Actions don’t exist in a vacuum. Autistic people think they do, and those are the same people defending pera.

>> No.4818207

>>4818201
I am what’s the next step

>> No.4818209

Ok so only vegans are allowed to take the moral high ground against Furfags, anyone else doesn't have the right to oppose zoophilia since you support the raping and painful murder of innocent animals.
>Vegan here
Furfags get the bullet too.

>> No.4818210

>>4818207
post lolis on dad

>> No.4818211

>>4818207
Put your neck in a noose

>> No.4818213

>>4818207
Quit dad and trace cp

>> No.4818215

>>4818209
morally superior vegan gang

>> No.4818227

>>4818124
Suddenly realised if there are pedos and zoophiles on dad it's because of grannys. Save a dad, eat a granny.

>> No.4818233

>>4818209
the furfags here don't actually want to fuck animals retard

>> No.4818238

>>4818209
you realize that the majority of furfags are only aroused by anthros right? zoophiles are rarely seen and are frequently ostracized by the furfag community. no one here is defending zoophilia, pedophilia is way worse, if you think they are the same offense you are mentally ill.

>> No.4818240

>>4818233
Their submissions tell me otherwise

>> No.4818241

>>4818233
Speak for yourself

>> No.4818244

>>4818238
I'm not against loli, I just don't like furfags and their fetish for animals.

>> No.4818248

Furart valiantly trying time broker peace between lolis and furries

>> No.4818254

>>4817890
good job banana, fuck all the niggers who cry buckets, hope they leave /dad/. All loli rules exist solely in order to avoid legal trouble, remember that autists.

>> No.4818262

>>4818254
>avoid legal trouble
>no terms of service agreement anywhere

yep, have fun trying to defend yourself in court

>> No.4818263

Pera please move to dropbox because I dont want to see your disgusting pedoshit thanks and bye

>> No.4818271

the moral of the story here is that if you want to draw lolis just give her a snout and some dog ears to pass the furry degenerate tribunal

>> No.4818273

>furart encouraging Pera
ew

>> No.4818277

>>4818263
b-b-b-b-b-b-b-b-bb-b-b-b-b-based

>> No.4818279

>>4818248
furart x tsflipp

>> No.4818280

>>4818271
This

>> No.4818283

>>4818240
which ones post actual bestiality then, because i'm not seeing any from anyone

>> No.4818287

>>4818271
no one does that

>> No.4818289

>>4818271
those are called "cubs". pedoshit disguised as furshit. not okay, and i dont think anyone here argued for that.

>> No.4818290

>>4818289
nobody on DAD posts cub shit so I dont get that retards argument. lolicons are disgusting the end

>> No.4818295

>>4818289

There are no rules on the site that disallow cub art. Don't just change the rules now.

>> No.4818296

>>4818295
banana has continually stated that cub art is banned on DAD

>> No.4818299

lilramune

>> No.4818300

>>4818295
there are, "no erotic depictions involving WHAT APPEARS TO BE minors". But as long as it's censored it should be fine.

>> No.4818301

>>4818296
I need it in writing on the site. Otherwise it's he said she said.

>> No.4818307

>>4818300
>>4818301

>> No.4818313

Why are people attacking furries, can we go back to wanting to lynch Pera?!?!

>> No.4818315

fuck pedos
fuck furries
fuck niggers and kikes
*drops mic*

>> No.4818316

>>4818313
We can't do anything to Pera because Banana's protecting him.

>> No.4818317

>>4818300

a 2 year old dog is 24 years old in human years

>> No.4818323

>>4818317
irrelevant, as it's appearance based.

>> No.4818325

>>4818262
Underrated post

>> No.4818331

pera is a pedophile, no idea why banana didn't kick him out the moment he drew loli porn. now he's just teabagging his face with those little girls portraits

>> No.4818332

>Thread theme
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H2LQMElLoLs

>> No.4818333

>>4818262
>>4818325
>>4817856
i wonder how many of you would actually sue banana / DAD given the chance

>> No.4818334

>>4818331
go home ramune

>> No.4818338

>>4818325t
it's a terrible post that's objectively false on all levels, we do have a "terms of service" in the submissions category. "Terms of service" are also legally completely irrelevant and at best give weight to your argument, they're never absolute.

>> No.4818339

>>4818334
no idea who that is

>> No.4818345

>>4818339
ok ramune

>> No.4818351

>>4818345
ok ramune

>> No.4818360

>>4818315
But I like black people and jews because I'm not a retarded nazi.

>> No.4818361

>>4818338
Underrated post

>> No.4818363

>>4818338

You have to agree to the terms.
>we do have a "terms of service" in the submissions category
does not hold water and any protection for you falls through

>> No.4818368

>>4818360
I dont like or hate any race in any special way because I am not a retarded racist.

>> No.4818369

>>4818315
Underrated post

>> No.4818370

>>4818338
Overrated post

>> No.4818375

Is the LAS discord better than this or are they all pedos too?

>> No.4818380

>>4818375
they dindu nutting. Like dadcord and furries

>> No.4818381

>>4818363
criminally underrated

>> No.4818385

>>4818363
dad is not commercial though, retard. You have to be able to prove damages(withholding a product), and you'll have a hard time proving any sort of damage from "my obscure gallery got banned for posting illegal content even though I didn't agree not to post illegal content!!!!". Lmao the lawyer will get up and tell you to get your ass out of here.

>> No.4818386

>>4816877
you dont use hard round?

>> No.4818389

>>4818385
extremely overrated

>> No.4818395

>>4818385
defamation of brand and character

>> No.4818400

>>4818271
just give them fat fucking tits and call them a shortstack

>> No.4818402

WE HAVE A LAWYER!

>> No.4818404

>Banana was an actual pedo all along.

>> No.4818407

>>4818386
I do use it all the time to be honest. It really is great. I just think that answering honest questions about brushes with this meme doesn't help anyone and spreads confusion.

>> No.4818413

>>4818395
heavily weighted post

>> No.4818416

It kinda reminds me of ooboo episode, but with less mystery.

>> No.4818417

>>4818395
has nothing to do with what you think it does, somebody would have to directly defame you. You can't complain about other users in a gallery to which you yourself signed up and posted personally lmao.

>> No.4818423
File: 230 KB, 454x707, 1578226727919.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4818423

>> No.4818425

>>4818416
rundown?

>> No.4818428

>>4818417

you're just really lucky I'm a nice enough guy not to sue despite the ball being in my court and let bygones be bygones

>> No.4818432

>>4818428
pshh nothing personnel kid

>> No.4818433
File: 104 KB, 894x1000, bluGFd.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4818433

>>4818407
yeah I understand if it's just a throwaway sarcastic response, just a lot of the time its people asking what brush someone used and hard round is the actual answer
Im enjoying using just hard round for imagination stuff more and more desu pic related

>> No.4818439

>>4817756
I think that seeing someone post highly detailed portraits of pre pubescent children in their gallery full of nsfw content is a big red flag.
Even if there's no correlation between the two, someone who's not a perverse retard would realize that you should not post one next to the other unless you want to give a strong impression of being a pedo.
And this kind of thing reflects bad on the site as well. It might not have broken any rules. But even then, I believe most people would like to cast a certain view over an entire site and all its users when this same site turns a blind eye to this kind of thing.
I personally don't feel comfortable with this. I expect the mods to at least discuss the issue.

>> No.4818441

>>4818428
why not
do it
if you succeed, dad is dead and banana will probably kill himself
if you fail, we get to laugh at how much of an idiot you are

>> No.4818444

What if two warnings = shadowban

>> No.4818445

larping

>> No.4818449

>>4818439
Yeah everyone realized this except autistic pedophiles and banana.
The rest are just trolling or making fun of him for letting such obvious thing happen.

>> No.4818451

>>4818439
he should just fuck off to dropbox like he threatened in the comments. the portraits give off a disgusting feeling

>> No.4818454

>>4818425
>there was a poster named ooboo, nothing special about him
>some anon posted a harsh comment about the "casual users of /dad/" along the lines of "casuals and people who actually want to git gud should be separated"
>some other random anon made a shitty list of users and their posting habits including the ways they capitalize their words and how long their sentences tend to be
>came to the conclusion it was ooboo
>shitposting happened
>ooboo took this as offense and posted something making him seem defensive and butthurt
>people laughed at him for that
>ooboo left
that's it. You can search for ooboo in the archives, start with the oldest posts first. You'll come across it after a page or two.

>> No.4818456

>>4818449
(You)

>> No.4818458

>>4818439
the mods discussed this and came to the conclusion: it broke no rules and community outrage isn't a relevant point.

>> No.4818459

>>4818454
kek sounds like nothing but I bet it was fun to see it happen in real time
thanks anon

>> No.4818465

>>4818439
i mean i understand furarts position on this
by the same token, i don't feel comfortable being on a site if people get kicked even when they're following the rules simply because enough people don't like them
there are plenty of autistic idiots who don't realize how weird some shit they do is (i.e. see that one meme image of some idiot furry posting RIP mom photos nestled in a massive degenerate vore / hyper gallery)

>>4818458
the mods haven't said anything only banana has and he's opened the discussion to them

>> No.4818469

>>4818465
banana is the senate

>> No.4818471

>>4818458
wrong lmao
why do pedophiles act as if everyone's silly but them? you're not an anime mastermind villain, autismo

>> No.4818483

>>4818425
I noticed how some dads are serious about their art, while others are putting in just 30 minutes a day. I've joked about making a separate discord for serious artists only. Someone got butthurt. I've started actually defending that idea. Autism started escalating. The guy that got butthurt analysed my posts, my style of writing and made some assumptions about my personality (seems to be young, isn't nice, etc) and made a whole chart showing which dads were most likely to be authors of my posts. It was hilarious! But unfortunately an innocent (dad named ooboo) was blamed for my posts. Ooboo, instead of ignoring it, made some submissions related to this drama, which in the eyes of butthurt Anon made it obvious it was really ooboo. I tried defending him, because I felt bad about this whole situation, but most people thought that only ooboo would defend himself like that. My attempts to fix this situation made everything worse.
Story ended with ooboo deleting his account and leaving. Some anons claim that ooboo is still around, but personally I doubt that. And I've read some books about appearing more friendly.

>> No.4818484

>>4818471

don't have children of your own please

>> No.4818485
File: 311 KB, 750x736, 1594858424558.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4818485

>>4818458
Why wasn't he banned when he broke the rules though?

>> No.4818486

>>4818483
what a mess but it sounds like not a big deal kek. thanks for the rundown

>> No.4818488

>>4818483
>And I've read some books about appearing more friendly.

kawaii

>> No.4818489

>>4818485
he got a warning like everyone does

>> No.4818490

>>4818485
he was warned? not all rulebreaks instantly result in a permanent ban. Even lilramune was originally going to get a month long ban for harassing users for years and shit.

>> No.4818494
File: 44 KB, 386x261, guess.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4818494

>>4818485

>> No.4818495

>>4818485
from what i heard you get warnings based on how egregious the acts were
lilramune was warned twice about lolishit (one submission and a challenge), before the bigdare/kazzy shit did him in
aphid i think just kept submitting shitposts and had his streak reset, then he got all butthurt and spammed the site leading to a full ban

>> No.4818496

>>4818483
That's the reason I change my writing style when I post here. I don't want something like that happening.

>> No.4818500

They should just make a gallery forbidding anyone who does NSFW art from uploading (at least realistic) little kids. That's all.

>> No.4818501

this thread is depressing, can we talk about something else now

>> No.4818506

>>4818433
Really nice!

>> No.4818508

>>4818500
A rule I mean, not a gallery.

>> No.4818509
File: 1.38 MB, 386x286, 1456146213180.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4818509

>>4818439
this post summs it up perfectly

>>4818449
i can't believe It's so fucking hard to Banana to take a stance on the question "is pedophilia on my site good or bad", such leadership

>> No.4818512

>>4818495
remember there was a perfect precedent for this. Tsflip posted loliporn and got the exact same punishment(maybe his streak was reset I don't remember)

>> No.4818513

>>4818501
what brushes do you use anon?

>> No.4818518

>>4818513
textured all the way! they are so fun and cute

>> No.4818519

>>4817890
anyone else feel like this is banana behaving in a nicnac-tier way
ive lost all respect for him

>> No.4818520

>>4818513
I use a textured brush

>> No.4818521

>>4818509
>i can't believe It's so fucking hard to Banana to take a stance on the question "is pedophilia on my site good or bad", such leadership
Where is the pedophilia on pera's list of submissions.

>> No.4818525

>>4818518
>>4818520
i want to use one but i feel i'm not good enough yet. do you suggest i just go for it or that i use HRB for a while first?

>> No.4818526

>>4818518
pyw?

>> No.4818527

>>4818519
>wtf how dare banana not ban him, doesn't he see there's this many outraged users?
>what do you mean there's rules?

>> No.4818529

>>4818521
in the submission removed by moderators days ago, dude

>> No.4818530

>>4818526
I post everyday on dad.

>> No.4818532

>>4818526
>>4818518
i agree, if you feel comfortable doing so

>> No.4818539

>>4818525
I dont render so I cant give you any advice on that. I use textured brushes and screentones in my work to make it look fun.

>> No.4818542

>>4818512
oh right i remember
tsflipp got two warnings and ever since then he just stopped posting lolishit
his streak was later reset for posting a placeholder instead of an actual submission

>> No.4818543

>>4818529
>removed by moderators days ago
So it was removed? What's the issue here then?

>> No.4818544

>>4818529
remember that banana would allow loliporn if he wasn't a pussy, he only cares about legal trouble. You can post obvious loliporn if you censor it, too.

>> No.4818546

>>4818527
He can make new rules, namely:

>People who have drawn child anime porn are forbidden from uploading more child drawings

>> No.4818550

>>4818546
So furries are also banned from realistic animal portraits then too, right?

>> No.4818551

>>4818546
this is
such a weird and specific rule

>> No.4818554

>>4818546
or he could tell you to eat ass instead of telling people what perfectly legal content is allowed to be posted in what combination

>> No.4818555

>>4818543
we just saying pera is a pedo

>> No.4818558

>>4818550
Non sequitur
>>4818551
All rules need to be specific

>> No.4818559

>>4818551
Exactly, which is why people shaming nana and calling for a ban are fucking retarded.

>> No.4818560

>>4818550
> people who have drawn cub art can now no longer post drawings of kittens or puppies

>> No.4818563

>>4818550
>>4818551
>>4818554
dumb seething pedos

>> No.4818567

>>4818558
>non sequitur
>draw furry porn
>therefore I presumably like animals
>therefore I shouldn't be allowed to draw realistic animals because that's bestiality

>> No.4818572

>>4818439
Adding to my previous comment, on the matter of site rules. I think it's important to consider that no rule book or law is absolute. People are not all-seeing. And if you look at the real world, rule books and laws always have to be updated because nothing is a constant closed system.
Example: Think of technological development and how often entities take advantage of this and laws are created as a response to a particular case scenario that has occurred. Which is used as a thinking point on what to do.

While site rules are written and we abide by them, these are in no way absolute. In the sense that now law is. So it can't be expected that every single action will be accounted for and covered by them.
In a situation like this, where rules exist but they might, or might not mold themselves well to dealing with the problem. A call for revision can be made. In order to think if the rules reflect the kind of community everyone wants and that is good for its users, without them being unfair to such.
Mind you, this does absolutely not mean that rules should be muddied, defined or re-defined in any unclear way. If anything, those responsible for them should carefully muse over things and come with as detailed a rule or set of rules as possible. Which would moderate problems without being unfair or causing users confusion at the time of acting.

>> No.4818573

>>4818513
mine. it's the same for classic painting, mix and smudge.

>> No.4818578

>>4818560
>>4818567
Anthros =/= Zoophilia
Pedophilia = Pedophilia

Besides that, furry porn is allowed. Loli isn't.

>> No.4818579

>>4818506
thanks

>>4818518
>>4818520
do you guys use blending/smudge tool stuff too? I've always just used brush and eraser but I keep seeing people using smudging in timelapses and I'm curious if it's faster

>> No.4818581

>>4818578
so what if he was drawing ferals? pretty sure nobody would give a fuck either

>> No.4818587

fuck pedos
fuck furries
fuck nigger furries and kike pedos

>> No.4818598
File: 301 KB, 559x781, 38902894.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4818598

>> No.4818600

>>4818581
I agree about banning furry porn too. No idea what you're arguing against. It's just that pedophilia is higher on the priority list.

Someone who was warned for drawing child porn should not be allowed to upload child drawings anymore. If you don't agree then it's ok I guess.

>> No.4818603

>>4818598
why is there a huge vibrator on the stool? is this peak drawing posture?

>> No.4818605

Can we ban furry porn please

>> No.4818606

>>4818600
reminder that these are the people upset about pera and this is why loliporn shouldn't have banned. These sorts of people don't deserve an inch of ground given to them or you'll be following shariah law next year.

>> No.4818607
File: 269 KB, 1263x819, VANI.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4818607

LOL

>> No.4818612

>>4818607
What is this stupid idiot doing

>> No.4818614
File: 885 KB, 1520x2150, kacper-swat-kacper-swat-3-copy.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4818614

>People going after the furries when Peda and his apologists are the issue.

>> No.4818615
File: 63 KB, 374x374, B28A0768-B14B-46E7-9536-8BC845C84B2C.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4818615

Banana may be the senate, but democracy has not died with thunderous applause, yet.

Cast your vote daddies:
https://strawpoll.com/orcvskq3f

>> No.4818617

>>4818606
But shariah enforces child rapists

>> No.4818620

>>4818605
Stop using the term "furry" when you should say "zoophile".

>> No.4818625

>>4818607
bruh

>> No.4818627

>>4818617
yeah but it's ok if you own the child legally. Maybe the children pera obviously has chained to the wall in his basement are all legally owned childwives, making this a-ok.

>> No.4818628

>>4818615
Considering in most cases a death sentence needs to be unanimous the poll is already null.

>> No.4818640

>>4818615
this question is not even the point of what we have been discussing here wtf

>> No.4818649

is no one going to point out that the girl drawing is a color picked trace

>> No.4818653

>>4818649
there are only tools my friend

>> No.4818656

>>4818614
Gah, I love the brushwork and those colors on his face.
Do you dads have a tutorial maybe about painting like that?

>> No.4818666
File: 166 KB, 1280x720, peraverdict.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4818666

>> No.4818672
File: 1.15 MB, 500x288, trail_over.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4818672

>>4818666

>> No.4818676

>>4818666
Thank you Satan for defending a pedo.

>> No.4818678

>>4818676
Get over yourself Cath

>> No.4818680

>>4818676
don't you have a million submissions you need to leave vague comments of praise on?

>> No.4818687

>>4818666
>https://strawpoll.com/orcvskq3f
>>4818672
>>4818678
>>4818680
all me

>> No.4818688

>>4818678
I will, but only if you'll suggest a tutorial for painting like that: >>4818614
Seriously, how to get such hue variants in your brushstrokes? I find it hard to believe that he colorpicked a new color after every stroke, but I don't know of any other way to even approach a painting like that...

>> No.4818692
File: 25 KB, 600x342, 1pmd3w.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4818692

>>4818615
Pera's paintings are fine alone, they are creepy when given context, but they do not break site rules so I hereby vote to keep Pera's drawings. Cath I completely understand your reasoning but we must remain objective if we are to protect the order of things.

>> No.4818694

The Pera Saga

>> No.4818696

>>4818483
Hi furart

>> No.4818702

>>4818692
I think it should be removed because it's a trace. No way he spent more than 30 minutes on that.

>> No.4818712

>>4818692
>not the younglings

>> No.4818713

>>4818694
peria chronicles

>> No.4818716
File: 793 KB, 680x956, pera.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4818716

>>4818702

>> No.4818717

>>4818702
>chaotic neutral

>> No.4818720

>>4818607
Nice Twitter page

>> No.4818722

Pera should be banned for the fun of it

>> No.4818723

>>4818722
DO IT FOR THE LULZ

>> No.4818724

>>4818722
>chaotic evil

>> No.4818725

ban everyone except pera

>> No.4818728

>>4818722
>>4818716

universe brain

>>4818725

multiverse brain

>> No.4818731
File: 275 KB, 589x417, inventory.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4818731

>Don't give up Nick!

>> No.4818732
File: 29 KB, 249x249, 050A4FC7-4F62-44E9-AA5C-C1A8DE962271.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4818732

>poll whistle blows

time for a quick rundown on how the vote is turning out, from an initial 10-10 to 20-20 split on whether to remove pera’s controversial post, the vote has swung, I repeat the vote has swung to 19-10 -

oh shit!

Breaking news! the pear-no-pedoing vote has made a surprising comeback with the vote now standing at 20-21 will they be able to overtake-

OH SHIT - it is now 24-21 that is a 3 vote lead for pear-no-pedoing, I repeat a threee vote lead. How will the poll turn now as more daddies file in? How will the turntables? Are furries anthro?Does is pedo pera?

find out next week on your poll whistle-

OH SHIT ITS 31-21

>manager! Hey manager!
>what?
>I’m out of script , I’m reacting like how-
>what you mean the caress are still rolling?
>WELL TURN IT OFF!

>> No.4818733

>>4818702
>>4818722
>>4818725
I can't believe I got outsmarted

>> No.4818737

>>4818732
autism

>> No.4818745

>>4818732
the last time I checked it was 20 to 10 for no ban, the fact that like 20 votes came in after most of the thread had already passed the poll only shows that antilolitards are assblasted

>> No.4818752

Can I ask Pera an honest question?
Pera were you molested when you were a kid or did the paedophilia develop on it's own? I'm curious.

>> No.4818768 [DELETED] 

My cousin was extremely lewd when she was younger (8-12 years old, I was 12-14). Things happened although unfortunately no skin to skin things just lewd body flashing and sexual wordplay. I guess overtime I developed an attraction to lolis. There are other instances when I was younger, but that's too much information. I'm not into actual children.

>> No.4818771

>>4818768
Cool story, bro.

>> No.4818778

test

>> No.4818780

>>4818752
when I was 12 year old the cia abducted me and injected me with 3 gallons of experimental medicine that turned me based and also I glow in the dark

>> No.4818781

pretend you didnt see that

>> No.4818785

>>4818775
No, I really thought that it was cool. I've screen-capped it and I'm going to masturbate to those posts later.

>> No.4818792

>>4818785

oh...okay

I hope one day I can turn my encounters with my cousin into a porn comic of some kind. Although it would be stretching the truth a bit, it's the fun that counts.

>> No.4818798

>>4818792
Can't wait to see it finished!

>> No.4818803

FREE TIBET

>> No.4818804

>>4818732
more people voted than there are in this thread

>> No.4818854

>>4818804
the strawpolls always get spammed by proxies, remember the one which got like 100 votes in 5 minutes and there were only 20 people in thread

>> No.4818869

>>4818854
the one voting for banana to kill himself you mean
I wonder who the spammer could be

>> No.4818890

can i submit something for two challenges if it took it took an hour and fits both challenges?

>> No.4818894

>>4818890
yes

>> No.4818895

>>4818890
Yes people do it all the time

>> No.4818900

>>4818869
don't act like that was the only poll not manipulated

>> No.4818907

>>4818894
>>4818895
ty lads

>> No.4818917

>>4818280
As he entered the church he could hear the soft voice of someone whispering into a cell phone.

>> No.4819010
File: 39 KB, 750x717, 1557645459166.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4819010

I thought it was funny how a few users overinflated the whole drama when the discord discussion only made of a few exchanges. Really makes you think.

>> No.4819011

6 minutes to submit and the dad site won't load

rip

>> No.4819013

>>4819010
howdy

>> No.4819017
File: 38 KB, 1019x483, file.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4819017

>>4819011
dad down?

>> No.4819020

>>4819011
post what you drew today in the discord so you can have a timestamp to reinstate your streak if need be
also please be page 1

>> No.4819026

>>4819011
>>4819017
up for me

>> No.4819028

>>4819020
Or anywhere with a timestamp, like a social media platform or google drive.

>> No.4819029

>>4819020
or post it here

>> No.4819035

I drew but I wasn't happy w/ what I did so I killed myself.

>> No.4819036
File: 343 KB, 1863x1062, completed submission.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4819036

Damn not on Discord

I'll take the L I should have submitted earlier

pretty sad though

>> No.4819054

>>4819036
username?
Will get you reinstated.

>> No.4819055

>>4818900
all the polls are manipulated

>> No.4819056

>>4819036
>>4819054
Femmipoo I got today's at 00:00:40

>> No.4819057

>>4819054
>>4819036
nevermind, got ya

>> No.4819060

>>4819057
thanks friend much appreciated

>> No.4819062

>>4819060
oh, and, just realized you're a fellow timezone dad
passed it along, though

>> No.4819063

I can’t post anymore, why is that?

>> No.4819064

>>4819036
I was notified of this by a moderator.
Because of the site outage, please make a submission with this doodle and link it to me in an email for reinstatement.

>> No.4819069

>>4819064
hi bananners

>> No.4819070

>>4819035
You could just blur it.

>> No.4819072
File: 798 KB, 1634x1489, D1F1CB7E-EB34-4B03-A0F9-5C5253678121.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4819072

>>4819063
It says I’m banned for some reason? Mistake?

>> No.4819074

>work hard drawing expressive poses
>try my best
>banana appears
>he calls it a doodle
;_;

>> No.4819076

>>4819074
you named it doodles.psd

>> No.4819078

>>4819072
cya webtoon :(

>> No.4819081
File: 9 KB, 322x382, ramune.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4819081

>>4819072
So that's what it looks like from the other side.

>> No.4819082

>>4819076
...ok, you've caught me, I was just larping.

>> No.4819085
File: 13 KB, 474x315, OIP.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4819085

>>4819082

>> No.4819086

>>4819078
I didn’t break any rules did I?

>> No.4819088

>>4819086
Yeah. Ban evasion is not under the rules

>> No.4819091

>>4819086
banana detected your excessive melanin levels and acted on it

>> No.4819097

>>4819091

I don’t get it. I think you got me confused for someone else.

>> No.4819099

>>4819086
Could you post your art?

>> No.4819100

>>4819091
Racist fuck

>> No.4819103

>>4819099
This. I really want to see what you drew today!

>> No.4819114

wait wtf why is wyebtoon banned for ban evasion?

>> No.4819115

>>4819099
>pyw
That kills the OP.

>> No.4819117

>>4819114
Probably because he's actually lilramune.

>> No.4819118

>>4819114
he was ramune most likely and banana found some sort of good enough proof

>> No.4819121

>>4819117
Yeah you definitely got the wrong user. I’m just here to make drawing a habit, not troll.

>> No.4819122

>>4819121
prove it

>> No.4819124

>>4819118
How did he come up with that sort of conclusion? Where's his proof? What happened with mod transparency?

>> No.4819126

>>4819072
>>4819081
cool lilramune got banned again

>> No.4819128

>>4819121
See: >>4819099

>> No.4819130

>>4819081
Ha. I toldju dawgs

>> No.4819131

>>4819122
Guilty until proven otherwise, huh

>> No.4819134

>>4819128
preferably with your hand included in the pic
and a photo of your favorite daughter

>> No.4819135

>>4819086
You can't hide your smelly style from me soda

>> No.4819140

>>4819117
Because he IS

>> No.4819142

>>4819131
Oh shut up. We don't know the whole story. And it's really suspicious that you won't post your art.

>> No.4819145

https://dad.gallery/users/2271/submissions
yea thats ramunes style

>> No.4819146

>>4819142
you can literally see it on his /dad/ account though?

>> No.4819166

Interesting thread. Thanks for the laffs

>> No.4819172

>>4819072
Who made the 404 banned image? Very cute!

>> No.4819193

>>4819072
What's with the gray serval?

>> No.4819197

>>4819193
puma

>> No.4819206

>>4819197
damn rip

>> No.4819255

>>4818605
no, fuck you

>> No.4819261

whatever happened with the pera issue? will he be banned or something?

>> No.4819264

Can we ban furry porn please

>> No.4819265

>>4819264
no, kys

>> No.4819269

>>4819193
It's lava lemur cosplay

>> No.4819275

>>4819261
moderators are currently deliberating

>> No.4819286

>>4819265
>furfag telling someone else to kys
HAH.

>> No.4819287

Tbqh if Pera gets banned J should get the axe too. Not to defend lolicons, but all the shota rape porn is pretty nasty and I'm surprised people don't raise a fuss about him when we all know what's behind the censor.

>> No.4819306

>>4819287
pera is getting hounded because he drew a real childs portrait after posting loliporn making people conjecture he jacks off to actual cp..

>> No.4819309

>>4819306
BASED, keeping these subhumans sweaty and writhing in mental anguish.

>> No.4819316

when's the last time furfags stirred up this much drama?

>> No.4819322

>>4819316
what does this even have to do with furries? the only furry that weighed in publically was pretty much the only person to defend pera. Literally rent free,

>> No.4819324

Can we ban furry porn please

>> No.4819330

so, i just joined DAD,cant join discord yet.......is the discord this much drama?

>> No.4819333

>>4819316
>Implying furfags are behind this
you sure it isn't the painterfags nor the cute posters ?

>> No.4819336

>>4819330
No. The only reason they're sperging is because they're anonymous and some other banned autist isn't in the server

>> No.4819371

>ramunes alt gets banned
>threads suddenly full of demanding other people get banned too

>> No.4819406

dad political map when?

>> No.4819413

>>4819371
hehe really makes you think

>> No.4819440

I'm depressed and this thread isn't helping

>> No.4819441

>>4819440
im depressed too lets be depressed together

>> No.4819443

>>4819440
>he isn't cheered up by a good witchhunt

>> No.4819467 [DELETED] 
File: 173 KB, 350x380, 80125006-0337-4D87-86F3-9CA6638E87DA.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4819467

>>4819371
I haven’t said a word in almost 3 hours. Not even going to respond further.

>> No.4819566

how are you all approaching the style challenge? Is it mostly master studies or are you applying other artist's styles to your original work?

>> No.4819571

>>4819566
Both or mostly the latter

>> No.4819588

>>4819440
stop fapping to actual kids

>> No.4819597

>>4819443
this. lolifags getting hunted brings me joy

>> No.4819657

So did banana ever actually off himself

>> No.4819701
File: 175 KB, 400x400, thumb_thumb_bunny.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4819701

The user of the day is... bunnyburger!
https://dad.gallery/users/30
Say something about art made by this user.

>> No.4819703

fuck banana

>> No.4819706

>>4819701
cute style but too much unfinished art and the dead gray background doesn't help
wish they used a better color and better visible lines for the sketches

>> No.4819707
File: 135 KB, 926x1040, 200812.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4819707

>>4819701
Good to see them at least with a few semi-rendered pieces, but per usual my only critique is to make more finished work.

>> No.4819742

>>4819701
I want to see more finished works from you

>> No.4819791

>>4819701
>952 submissions
damn, nice

>> No.4819829

I wish the flawless would fall already, and make space for dads stuck on page 2... I deserve my spot in the limelight, dammit

>> No.4819833

>>4819829
second pagers arent even at 100 streaks you deserve nothing

>> No.4819868
File: 296 KB, 1855x867, fbi.gov.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4819868

Who cares what banana decides, the FBI (or whatever you have in your country) accept anonymous tips for SUSPICION of illegal activity.

something like: "An artist who draws pictures of children doing sex acts recently started drawing portraits of real children, I'm worried the pictures may be of kids he actually knows and that they might be in danger", then give link to dad.gallery profile.

Fuck Pera and Fuck pedos, they're in a class of their own and should be banned immediately not warned. Pera knows what he was doing and he dragged everyone else on the site and all their work through shit with him.

>> No.4819884

>>4819868
Ok, now this is Based.

>> No.4819895

>>4819868
don't do this wtf. it was already confirmed and asked to not be done by the people who look at these reports. it prevents confirmed pedos from being investiagted.

Not defending Para I dont want to see his shitty pedo crap but reporting is a retarded idea.

>> No.4819899

>>4819868
Trying to reach 700 posts before thread ends I see?

>> No.4819901

>>4819895
Say what you want, but don't call his art shitty - he's better than majority of dads

>> No.4819908

>>4819868
we did it daddies, we ended pedophilia

>> No.4819911

>>4819901
it's still shit especially his non studies are just bad

>> No.4819921

>>4819901
All of his art pieces that aren't studies are bad, and even the studies the way in which he makes the brush strokes is awful, it looks like a filter more than a painting.

>> No.4819926

>>4819901
he probably just paints over photos desu

>> No.4819935
File: 52 KB, 600x629, 854333608657.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4819935

DADs I'm not sure if I want this whole fbi / pedo shit assosiated with me, should I leave?

>> No.4819938

>>4819935
yes, you probably shouldnt have joined a 4chan community if you aren't comfortable with retarded autism and such

>> No.4819964

>>4819935
thinking about that too

>> No.4819970

>>4818692
Jedi masters are not members of the senate so hereby your vote is removed

>> No.4819976

>>4819935
wow, if only the post could be removed by banana, then we all wouldn’t have to worry about whether to leave or not.

>> No.4819977

I just got back from visiting a few temples around my country, DADs, what that hell is happening here?

>> No.4819980

>>4819977
Welcome back my temple friend. have you achieved enlightenment?

>> No.4819981

>>4819977
user that posted loliporn posted a realistic portrait of a child, people found it sickening and there was drama.

>> No.4819985

>>4819976
it isnt just the one post its his whole gallery

>> No.4819995

>>4819976
what post lmao are you retarded? so if that specific painting is removed everything is ok? this might be the most meteoric take after "I don't think pera put in 30 minutes of work so he should get his streak removed for it"

>> No.4820001

>>4819980
he did but after seeing the thread it is gone now

>> No.4820002

>>4819977
We are trying to lynch a pedo.

>> No.4820101

>>4820002
Why aren't you succeeding?

>> No.4820105

what the FUCK tipsy

>> No.4820109

>>4820101
Because there are more pedos here who defend him

>> No.4820113

>>4820105
holy shit my sides

>> No.4820115

>>4820113
is this what happens when you consoom too much coom?

>> No.4820128
File: 907 KB, 820x963, tipsy.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4820128

>>4820115
this is what he looks like. Does this look like the face of a coomer to you?

>> No.4820131

>>4820128
Yes.

>> No.4820134

>>4820128
What brushes are you using?

>> No.4820138

>>4820128
>constantly cooming, even whilst doing self portrait
is this peak performance?

>> No.4820144

>>4820138
lmao

>> No.4820149

>>4820134
its from a self protrait challenge

>> No.4820153

Do you guys thinking Pera is deleting all the cp he has in his computer now that the other anon reported him to the fbi?

>> No.4820158
File: 221 KB, 1400x1100, 1570608162877.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4820158

New Thread
>>4820157