/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

[Anonymous No.7067969]

Can you still get away with drawing loli on Twitter?

[Anonymous No.7067975]

As long as you do something that clearly ages them up, like hips and breasts. Also I don't think that Amy counts as a loli, she is 12 but doesn't really act nor look it and most people draw her as grown up because of that.
If not, you are on the chopping block and it's only a matter of time till you catch someone's attention.

[Anonymous No.7067987]

>>7067975
I was just going to ask, because I wanted to do some explicit MHA fanart, but I aged them up, but wasn't sure if that would cause an issue, or not.

[Anonymous No.7068579]

Anon who cares? Age them down you faggot. Dont tell me you live in a hellhole that considers drawings illegal?

[Anonymous No.7068586]

>>7067969
I have mutuals who draw loli, but they're less popular than I, so go for it.

[Anonymous No.7068587]

does "all chars i draw are 18 and above" not work anymore

[Anonymous No.7068590]

>>7068587
No, now moderators use their own "judgment" when deciding. Doesn't matter what you say or do, if they are offended they'll kill you.

[Anonymous No.7068593]

>>7068590
Proof or an example of this happening?

[Anonymous No.7068595]

>>7068593
My Dad owns twitter

[Anonymous No.7068598]

>>7068593
Not him but it could happen on deviantart. It happened to me when I drew a MHA character and people saw it as trending as my first post. It got removed and then the algorithm didn't favor me after that.

[Anonymous No.7068625]

QRD?
did something change in recent years?
I thought japanese artists drew loli on twitter no problem

[Anonymous No.7068628]

>>7067969
i draw and posted mimi morton(12) with micro bikini and nothing happened

[Anonymous No.7068902]

>>7068628
pics or it didn't happen

[Anonymous No.7068952]

>>7068902
https://files.catbox.moe/d364q5.jpg

[Anonymous No.7069050]

>>7068952
amazing

[Anonymous No.7071756]

I've survived with pseudo-sfw loli so far

[Anonymous No.7072017]

I'm not a lolicon, but if you draw an attractive girl, no matter what, I like it

[Anonymous No.7072018]

>>7068595
>t. X Æ A-Xii Musk

[Anonymous No.7072106]

>>7071756
you aren't orenji, faker

[Anonymous No.7072119]

as a cunnysseur, i fucking hate pornographers drawing all these characters as fat cows

just pick an adult instead, nigger, what the fuck

if you look up any slightly young character on rule 34, youll be bombarded by amerishart tier bimbos because its nono to enjoy a body that looks smallk but a-ok to stroke your dick all day to obese whores

fuck you

[Anonymous No.7072124]

>>7072119
westoids want to have their cake and eat it too
like how they pretend they're a renegade fighting the system by drawing rebecca porn lmao

[Anonymous No.7073978]

[Anonymous No.7074455]

>>7072119
It's because they want to jump on a popularity bandwagon but don't want to rock the boat in any way, so they make them into completely off model people that somewhat look like the character.

[Anonymous No.7074684]

>>7068952
kaaii

[Anonymous No.7075349]

nsfw loli? absolutely not. elon "free speech" musk is insane.

[Anonymous No.7075352]

>>7067969
Depends, if Elon's mods are anal, you'll get nuked. If you mean westoid criticism, it's all harmless if you don't acknowledge it. If you never engage the retards they don't know how to continue harassing you. It's why the japs get away with it all the time, language barrier = ignored.

[Anonymous No.7076367]

the question should be can you get away with drawing nsfw on twitter AT ALL?

once you get hit with the censorship tag, you're gone. i'm wondering if it's even worth making a new account cuz i get no eyes on my stuff AT ALL.

muskrat faggot ruined it worse than i thought was possible.

[Anonymous No.7076454]

>>7072119
>its nono to be a pedophile but a-ok to be attracted to adults
wow crazy, must be some kind of conspiracy or something

[Anonymous No.7076553]

>>7076367
lmao twitter is literally the most NSFW-friendly soc media site
obviously lolishit gets banned (but only if mass-reported) but there's literally hundreds, maybe thousands of NSFW artists getting shitloads of likes and retweets, actual engagements
show me any other site with this kind of reach. just one.
and of course, if there's no eyes than that's simply because your stuff is trash. no one wants to look at garbage. pyw, or i'll consider you as one of those 'MUH ALGORITHM' retards.

[Anonymous No.7077248]

>>7076454
You say this but a 10 year old girl is considered OK to draw porn of by twitter moralfags because nostalgia

[Anonymous No.7077763]

>>7067969
Yeah you can. You just ignore anyone going "She's a minor!" or tossing her real age out there as an own. They're QRT your stuff just to hate on it but you'll also get eyes on it from people supporting you for not backing down with it. They can always block you, but wont for some reason.

>>7067975
>Also I don't think that Amy counts as a loli, she is 12 but doesn't really act nor look it and most people draw her as grown up because of that.

The ages in sonic never really mattered aside from Cream, and that's because she's been the only cast member with a parent in the games for years. Everyone else lives life like an adult on their own. Plus even back in the day, you had to go out of your way to find the ages and IIRC sega even took the ages off the official website because they just don't matter.

[Anonymous No.7078649]

>>7076454
Yes, marrying a young, healthy and fertile-for-years-to-come woman is preferrable to marrying an unnealthy hambeast on 3 different types of meds who will give your genetic failure children Fetal Alcoholic Syndrome and a poor role model on self care and discipline.

Not that I'm shaming your fetish for obesity, just keep the eye gore to yourself

[Anonymous No.7078664]

>>7077248
I kinda get the argument of, well I was attracted to this character back when I was 10 and watching the show so it's a little more believable and I'm willing to give the benefit of the doubt for some characters like raven or gwen but with gwen there's litterally an adult version in the original show, I don't get why they wouldn't use that design instead. (There's also the version in alien force who's older but again this is trying to be charitable and that design/character has a totally different look/feel)

[Anonymous No.7079127]

>>7078649
Talk like a human please

[Anonymous No.7079371]

>>7077248
Retard. people complain about young gwen all the time. It's all about the audience you cultivate. artist draw fake lolis because they are too stupid to make a alt and just say it's some guy using ai if the ever get questioned about it.

[Anonymous No.7079377]

>>7078649
desu senpai

[Anonymous No.7079384]

>>7067969
for fuck sake how many anons are going to ask about this?
Yes! If you live in the US or anywhere were freedom of expression is respected, nothing is going to happen. Also isn't Elon Musk a free speech advocate?

[Anonymous No.7079392]

>>7079384
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
OH MY SHIT
Holy fuck
You dull eyed cow.

[Anonymous No.7079818]

>>7079384
Doesn't matter, they still ban loli and even if they didn't they ban accounts that get mass reported.

[Anonymous No.7079838]

>>7067975
>Amy
>12
>with that figure & visible breasts
>also acts and sounds like an adult

No way

[Anonymous No.7079842]

This was true in her SA1 render, but not so anywhere else.

[Anonymous No.7080080]

>>7079392
>>7079818
of course you cannot expect libtards or prudish cuckservatives to respect freedom. That why sites like reddit and facebook is filled with room temperature IQ faggots and even worse mods.
But why would they have any power on twitter that is owned by a libertarian?

[Anonymous No.7080172]

>>7068593
Mrscrambled I guess but the dude is a pedo so.....

[Anonymous No.7083435]

>>7067969
https://twitter.com/BepDelta/status/1764267779580932162
apparently there is a group of literal faggots mass reporting loli artists

[Anonymous No.7083475]

I used to do it, but I deleted every post and loli repost from my feed.
It's just not convenient.
1, there's fags reporting loli accounts, but more importantly and more insane,
2, Patreon has a dedicated team of people tracking your connected pages and if you have things that may break THEIR tos on TWITTER, they'll close your Patreon (even if you dont post loli on patreon). This has been happening for a while, and because loli posters are regarded as trash, nobody cares, but it's a really concerning thing they do and nobody calls them up for it.

[Anonymous No.7083661]

>>7067975
>As long as you do something that clearly ages them up
I tempted fate one too many times.

[Anonymous No.7083724]

>nooo why won't you let me post graphic porn and nudity of child like figures for everyone to see?
>noooo stop deboosting my account!
>noooo stop labeling my posts as sensitive media!
>nooooo why do i have to respect the tos?
>why do you hate freedom of speech so much?
You literal subverting fucking cum for brains
It's obvious that you just want an excuse to push porn around in public and indulge in your exhibition fetish because it isn't enough that you have to be a degenerate, everyone else must indulge and praise you while you do that.
>"waaaaaah stop banning me and indulge in my fetish or you hate free speech you puritan albino jew cuckservating libertarian politics politics!!"
You sound exactly like trannies who accuse everyone of homophobia because they don't want to send their toddlers to drag queen story time.
>there is fags reporting accounts
Because it's easy prey.
Who is going to complain if one or multiple pedophile get removed from the face of the earth? No one, it will actually be applauded.

Yo, here is some stupid idea: instead of posting loli on normal social media sites full of normies; just don't and you won't have any problem.
Why don't you do that? Because it's obvious that you're just low IQ degenerates.

Now shoot the messenger because you need to cope and you respect freedom of speech so much, you pseudo-trooners.

[Anonymous No.7083987]

>>7083724
>It's obvious that you just want an excuse to push porn around in public and indulge in your exhibition fetish because it isn't enough that you have to be a degenerate, everyone else must indulge and praise you while you do that.
Lolishitters want to have the Twitter artist clout for some retarded reason, just post on Baraag for your sick fuck shit if you really want to draw it

[Anonymous No.7083989]

>>7083435
these are bara/fatfag artists who are known to be mentally ill, i don't think they're the same type of people who enjoy artists like pantsu ripper

[Anonymous No.7084004]

>>7083435
Based, loli faggots should be hanged

[Anonymous No.7084059]

>>7083987
Porn is their entire personality and IQ, what do you expect?

[Anonymous No.7084078]

i've seen artists draw xj9 all the time sucking dick and no one gave a shit

people are double-faced when it comes to certain characters

[Anonymous No.7084146]

>>7083724
tldr moralfaggot

[Anonymous No.7084152]

>>7083724
>child like figures
I object to this statement

because they aren't child *like*, they *are* children. That's, you know, kinda the whole point of LOLITA (young girl) and SHOTA (young boy) complex, it's pedo- (as in child) -philia (as in sexual attraction). Frankly I'm pretty sick of the mealymouthing and weaselling around that very obvious and pertinent fact. And it has zero place being openly acceptable in society. It's mental illness.

>inb4 hurr hurr ur a xitter tranny and u hate anime
Neither one of those things are true. The thing about loli/shotacons is that they're attracted to *children* and they make sure that their art accurately represents what makes the childlike figure sexually arousing to them. There are leagues of difference between that and a sexually developed teen character (if you have an actual fetish for that it's ephebophilia desu-nee) or a moefied adult character. I'm not one of those retards that screech "PEDOPHILE AAAAH PEDOPHIIIILE" off the rooftops if you heckin' DARE look at a 16-17 year old the very SECOND you turn 18 years of age or watch anime or whatever other complete neo-puritan nonsense that's mixed up laws regarding pornography and sexual exploitation of minors for actual moral standards. I know of at least one couple where one was 16 years of age and the other 5-10 years older who got married and are still married 30 years later and there's nothing wrong with that. Legit ephebophilia is skeevy and degenerate, but pedophilia is actual mental sickness that can cause harm to children, and society at large has *very* good reason to hate it.

[Anonymous No.7084157]

>>7084152
USE.
TRANSLATION TOOLS.
NOW.

[Anonymous No.7084169]

>>7084157
'Scuse me? Whatchoo yappin' about there, boy?

[Anonymous No.7084172]

>>7067969
No, and at this point there's no point in trying. If you wanna post loli, just use baraag or misskey.
Also reminder to everyone that drawings of fictional children having sex isn't illegal. It might be immoral, but looking at porn in general is inherently immoral anyway. You can get away with posting art of fictional girls vigorously masturbating in public but public indecency is a crime, why is posting art of fictional characters doing illegal things bad? Moral outrage over art in general is fucking gay and I want everyone who agrees with banning any sort of art to get free one-way helicopter rides.

[Anonymous No.7084177]

>>7067975
Amy definitely doesn't count, she has bazooka tits in SA2 for god's sake. Besides, the ages in Sonic have never made any sense, Sega actually removed the ages from official material about 2 years ago iirc (likely because everyone knows how nonsensical and irrelevant they are).

[Anonymous No.7084179]

>>7080080
>turkeytom

Breadtubers and "LE HECKIN WHOLESOME AWESOME" toon vidya reviewers are all the same type of crooks, sucking each others dick and then backstabbin each other when their own dirty laundry gets exposed, i mean how many times TurkeyTom had to apologized over calling someone falsely a pedophile? only to go back and bitch about Anime and Manga, for algorythm clicks on the whole "JAPAN IS WEIRD" trite?

[Anonymous No.7084188]

>>7084152
>they are children
I agree although at the end of the day, is it real kids or drawings? This isn't an argument pro or against it.

This can argued like for gore
Does graphic gore belong in the public eye or is it absolutely not allowed to exist?

I'm rather sick of lolitrannies always playing the victim and claiming that everyone hates them for no reason when in fact they can just go on any other sites where their shit is allowed and have no problems, but they want everyone to clap their hand and tell them how brave and talented they are for what they jerk off to i.e. exactly like trannies do.

You want to post gore, go on the sites where gore is allowed.
You want to post loli porn, just inform your local fbi agent about it.
Simple as.

[Anonymous No.7084196]

>>7084152
Not to be that guy, but multiple [influencers / e-celebs / popular internet fag / etc] have been pushing the "big boobs = adult, no boobs = child" narrative. It's all moralfagging in the end. Yes, it is quite easy to say child bad while ignoring the weird area of 14-17 because that is too much effort for an issue they don't care about. In short, "if it looks old enough, who cares"

[Anonymous No.7084213]

>>7084188
>Does graphic gore belong in the public eye or is it absolutely not allowed to exist?
It should be allowed, just with a warning on it, death is literally an inevitably, why are people trying to gaslight society into thinking it doesn't happen? I am kind of miffed sites like LiveLeak went down.

[Anonymous No.7084234]

>>7078664
>but with gwen there's litterally an adult version in the original show, I don't get why they wouldn't use that design instead.
because it sucks and doesn't have the same vibe as the other gwen

[Anonymous No.7084240]

>>7084213
So, then, if something is allowed, who or what decides if that is allowed on a specific platform?
Say i want to go into your house and jump with my dirty boots on your bed, would you allow me that? No? Does that mean you hate me for no reason and you must let me jump on your bed?

Graphic gore has nothing to do with the concept of death itself, nor can the graphic display of violence and guts be justified with
>yeah but everyone dies
Then we can just allow crimes to be committed because
>yeah, they're going to happen anyway
And the same argument can also be made against any type of content
>yeah, its going to get censored anyway

The matter of the fact is that graphic content does affect people mentally and physically and generally, the further you keep that content out of easy reach and the public eye, the better.

[Anonymous No.7084261]

I love cunny so much it's unreal

[Anonymous No.7084420]

>>7083987
>Gloss actually got away with drawing loli

[Anonymous No.7084423]

>>7084420
if that's gloss she should have dick sucking lips.

[Anonymous No.7084508]

>>7067975
You will get bitched at and cancelled for drawing any "loli" character as an adult regardless, it's better to keep in mind that you are being screamed at by a woman and to disregard anyone with less testosterone than you.

[Anonymous No.7084668]

>>7083724
>>7084152
You guys will have a point when other degenerate media is also bannable, such as furfaggotry and LGBT propaganda. Until then, you're just going with the convenience of the legal argument, no actual morality.

[Anonymous No.7084671]

>>7068587
Since Elon, there have been more Loli artists on Twitter again because he scared all the trannies away.

[Anonymous No.7084679]

>>7084240
If you are a child, get off the Internet.
There's a difference between different platforms having different goals and the witch hunt on topics like lolis and political wrongthink, with entire credit card lobbies to shut down any platforms that would want to allow such content.

Patreon had a noNSFW rule back in the day, that was their vision as a platform. Now they allow porn, but ban a lot of nono subjects just because theyve become hostages of payment processing services, that is not a choice, they dont give two shits if you draw loli as long as they get money out of it, but that cant be done without repercussions so they go on a witch hunt and make a show out of it to get some brownie points.

Pornographers are immoral one way or another, trying to moralize it is stupid, everything can be misconstrued as unsavory, theyre now banning implied rape, incest and whatnot, IN FICTION

[Anonymous No.7084696]

>>7084671
Ehem, Elon makes it so you can be doxxed via mobile if someone calls you.

[Anonymous No.7084735]

>>7084671
>there have been more Loli artists on Twitter again because he scared all the trannies away.
Unironically, I've been banned way more often under Elon than when lefty faggots ran twitter.I can't even break 50 followers without getting banned.

[Anonymous No.7084774]

>>7084213
>It should be allowed, just with a warning on it, death is literally an inevitably
Kek, and he starts his mental gymnastics already. The only reason you think one drawing is ok and the other is not is your amerilard puritan made up moral high ground and any argument you have is just an attempt at rationalisation.

[Anonymous No.7084813]

>>7084423
https://gelbooru.com/index.php?page=post&s=list&tags=gloss+loli

[Anonymous No.7084863]

>>7084735
Who are you?

[Anonymous No.7084903]

>>7083989
>>7083435
https://twitter.com/minicooly/status/1763159366931530108
a bunch of literal furry faggots lmao going around reporting artists they don't agree with

[Anonymous No.7084904]

>>7067969
You'll need to state her legal age and post a signed disclaimer.

[Anonymous No.7084933]

>>7084668
But if anyone makes a small argument based on morality or decency and common sense then it is called moralfaggotry and then it automatically gets dismissed.

Anon, draw and do and jerk off to what the fuck you want, but don't change definitions because calling it what it is makes you feel guilty and shameful about it.
>>7084679
But there is still no actual moral argument being made here.

>theyre now banning implied rape, incest and whatnot, IN FICTION
So, and instead of trying to point out the motivator and reasoning for this, you just put the blame on moralfaggotry?
Most people don't want to see that shit because it makes them highly uncomfortable and it has nothing to do with morality, but rather a natural reaction; you can't genuinely and sanely demand anyone to be exposed to graphic content because you are numb to it
>"yeah bro just watch gore, i do it all the time. wtf do you mean you don't want to, what are you some puritan or something? everyone gonna die and people blow up other people anyway so consume the fucking gore now, bigot"
Advertisement and public images are the way they are because there is a common denominator and modus operandi across the globe, not a cultural morality.
It don't make financial sense to alienate a majority of people because of a minority of degenerates wants to jerk off in public and expose their fetish to everyone.

It's the same as people going vegetarian once they see how animals are butchered for mass production because it is that repulsive to them.
This is rather based on emotions, but valid nonetheless, because of the subject being the reaction people have to stuff and its consequences.

>Pornographers are immoral
Honestly depends but why does morality suddenly matter now?

One can just simply block&mute on sns, and if a lot of people aren't interested or are repulsed by it, is it then moralfaggotry and puritanism and do you have the right to demand they consume your content or else they're nazi bigots?

[Anonymous No.7085018]

>>7084933
You are disingenious, I'm assuming you're the anon saying "if you want to draw loli, just go somewhere where it's allowed", and this is clearly not how it works, as loli (and some other topic) are outright chased after.

I am calling moral to the table because there are only two reasons to ban loli: laws and morals.
The moral side hold no ground when other heavy topics are allowed.
So if you agree with Patreon banning fictional incest, your opinion on the banning of loli is consistent.

However, I am black on white. I do not accept an Internet full of pornography, as we have, where some pornographies are considered more chaste than others.
If you are a hosting platform like Twitter, then sure, put a filter to avoid the "emotional responses" that would drive away your customers, and ban people disrespecting the filter requirements.

But outright banning the content is non-negotiable to me. I say that as someone who dislikes coom art. I am not interested in wank material popping up on my feed.
But I am also completely against censorship and, more than that, morally contradicting censorship.

I do disagre with your opinion that "most people" would be particularly offended by some hentai of two siblings fucking or "implied non-consensual sex", such as some scene of a girl saying "no, we shouldn't..." at the beginning and then enjoying it, which has been axed by Patreon before.
People who would think this is too much but are okay with vanilla porn are just retard niggers who want everyone who listens to music to listen to only one genre they like and that's it. No more metal, no more electronica, we can only listen to Taylor Swift.

Either ban music entirely or don't complain that people jack it off to different things than you. The lines might seem clear in your disingenuous mind, since you flipflop between arguments, "haha just don't draw underages", but that is demonstrably not enough, anything that makes people "feel" it's kid-like gets shat on.

[Anonymous No.7085063]

>>7085018
>I am calling moral to the table because there are only two reasons to ban loli: laws and morals.
>or offended
Or simply because of public image of the company/site because most people aren't comfortable seeing child porn or gore or other extreme graphic imagery that could cause an involuntary mental or physical reaction, that would drive away customers and users, leaving the site to die.
Since you still won't accept that as it is factual but insist on the law&morals boogeyman you are building a strawman, Anon.
>Just put a filter
That is just an excuse for your argument because the point becomes;
>"lol just close your eyes"
Then you can very well apply that to everything and anything.

I could also say
>"lol private company they can do whatever they want. who cares about xyz? not my problem"

>i am someone
>you are someone
Extremely irrelevant.
It doesn't validate or invalidate arguments because someone is on a specific side or hold certain opinions and when you say that it truly boils down to
>"uhhhm we're the good guys and you're the bad guys so how can you be right? lol"
And i'm the one being disingenuous here. Holy shit.

>"NOOO WHY WON'T THE PRIVATE COMPANY WHO CARES ONLY ABOUT MONEY AND USER RETENTION NOT ALLOW SPECIFIC CONTENT THAT I LIKE?! FUCKING MORALITANS LAW ABIDERS"
Yeah, why doesn't the church allow me to go molest nuns or hang up nun porn in the vatican when i have a nun fetish? Fucking puritans

But riddle me this, nigger, if the market is almighty and "sex sells" therefore the market can do no wrong, why do you believe you are allowed to object to the market's demands? The market doesn't want loli porn, so why question it?

If loli made money and everyone was ok with it, you wouldn't see it banned and chased off the public eye.

Yeah, but it clearly is a conspiracy by crypto albino jews that most people don't want to see child porn because instincts are cringe. Fucking bigots.

[Anonymous No.7085073]

>>7073978
No ! That is NOT Orenji !

[Anonymous No.7085119]

>>7084152
If I draw a nuke, am I now in possession of a wmd? Man I'm gonna fuck some shit up!

[Anonymous No.7085125]

>>7077248
Age doesn't fucking matter. They aren't fucking real
The problem is getting off to literal children bodies. That is not a child, and never will be. Women have those bodies, not children.

Caring about the age number singles you out as the real pedophile, next to seeking for underdeveloped bodies.

[Anonymous No.7085129]

>>7085125
can't stop won't stop

[Anonymous No.7085151]

>>7083989
>>7084903
Those guys got me banned because I did ONE oneeshota drawing once, and I was close to 10k as well. I got banned on December and just recently managed to get half of what I used to have

[Anonymous No.7085162]

>>7078649
You will never normalize pedophilia, no matter the amount of mental gymnastics you go for.
As long as it stays a fantasy and you don't turn into a child molester is fine though.

[Anonymous No.7085169]

>>7084196
>"if it looks old enough, who cares"
And what is wrong with that line of thought?

[Anonymous No.7085272]

>>7085018
You're clearly not a rational person, you're irrational, and an extremist.

[Anonymous No.7085303]

>this whole thread
I believe you all are making this topic even more convoluted than it probably should be.

[Anonymous No.7085324]

>>7085169
That line of thought is being applied to the fictional high school anime asian girl in the context of cp

[Anonymous No.7085467]

>>7085063
It's been show men feel the same disgust response from watching gore and watching two men kissing, yet platforms not only allow, they promote gays.

The offensiveness of a content is not an argument, you are inconsistent and dishonest.

Filters are not lol just close your eyes, filters inform you what not to look at if you dont want to, are you retarded?

>content that I like
Once again you are being disingenious. You say it doesnt matter who I am, but Ive already stated I do not enjoy pornography, on my feed, yet you "argument" is painting me as a coomer.
Molesting people in church is different from having content that is filtered that you can choose to click or not.

>if it's not allowed, then it's not profitable
Once again, retarded. Are you saying drugs and prostitution and ponzi schemes and gambling are not profitable for the dealers? Hm... maybe you're right, these activities are totally not marketable, that's why the government made them illegal.

Kill yourself, nigger, you are incapable of rational thought, examples only matter when they confirm what you want. My point hasn't changed an inch: like it or not, it should be allowed, and either ALL porn should have filters on it or none should.

[Anonymous No.7085474]

>>7085467
>It's been show men feel the same disgust response from watching gore and watching two men kissing, yet platforms not only allow, they promote gays.
Wow, men that THAT fragile? One is the literal end of a life and brings sadness, the other is happiness without restriction.

I guess those men aren't real human beings if they are that weak to seeing affection between other human beings.

[Anonymous No.7085476]

>>7085272
I am utterly destroyed by your refutations, killing myself brb,

[Anonymous No.7085561]

>>7085018
You're the kind of retard who thinks all crimes are the same, loitering deserves jail just like murder. There's levels to this shit, CP is not equivalent to regular porn and anything drawn is not the same as when you have actual actors etc even if both are bad they are not the same, get it?

[Anonymous No.7085589]

>>7085467
>calls other disingenuous
>posts nothing but strawmen and all the logical fallacies
>if i keep accusing others of being disingenuous, they will be because i say it does
>hehe no one is ever going to read what i wrote or accuse me of anything if i say what i belong to hehe im so smart
And then you wonder why no one wants loliniggers around.
You should remain sacrificial lambs, Anon.

[Anonymous No.7085599]

>>7085324
I have no idea what you just tried to imply.
What's wrong with aging up characters that are canonically underage and making porn of them?

[Anonymous No.7085601]

>>7084213
>>7085018
>>7085467
What a weird ass hill to die on
>I hate coom!
>But I also hate censorship!
>So all coom and gore should be allowed!
Sorry to burst your bubble but /b/ and /trash/ are not the rest of the internet. People have something called tolerance, there are people that still think this site is "icky" and "alt-right" and refuse to use it. We all have our limits, hell i personally think anthro/furry women are hot, and thats weird to some people, especially the people on THIS site. But that doesn't mean I wanna see incest, gay sex, lolisho, rape, gore etc. Without control and moderation every site just becomes /trash/ and /b/ which are containment boards for a reason. And honestly just stay in your lane. If you want to make lolisho content just stick to pixiv and fanbox. NO ONE would bat an eye. Different sites have different cultures, thats what makes them appealing. Just stick with the one that lines up with you.
Also
>Music analogy
I'm unironically all for analogies but you're quite literally comparing apples to oranges.

[Anonymous No.7085612]

>>7085601
whoa hey stop being so disingenuous
what do you mean people have sensibilities? why do you lie?
omg fucking puritan

you want to see that content but you're just gaslighting me
i said it first so you can't accuse me of being guilty of it
hehe chcekcmaet i am so smart

[Anonymous No.7085614]

>>7085599
The xitters hate loli because they say "it's cp" while ignoring the anime high school girl coom because "it looks old enough" Do you not see the contradiction here?
>whats wrong with aging up a character and making porn
Nothing, it's a fictional drawing of a fictional character, who cares. Unfortunately we've seen how this played out on just ecchi shit, so

[Anonymous No.7085624]

Why make the connection with the character at all in the first place? Why not just make a generic bit titty maid with pink hair?

I dunno man, i dont feel comfortable getting reminded of a child when i watch porn.

[Anonymous No.7085667]

>>7085614
>The xitters hate loli because they say "it's cp" while ignoring the anime high school girl coom because "it looks old enough" Do you not see the contradiction here?
No. Only (You) think they are real to being with
Age doesn't exist for something not born. Not alive. Not real. So what's left is depiction. And sorry, just because the anime said this is a 12 year old, that isn't what real 12 year olds look like, that's a adult woman. Which is normal to think about fucking.

It's not normal to want to fuck a literal toddler body with zero development . If YOU get off to that, and use "BUT MUH CONTRODICTIONS!" as a scapegoat, you're far more retarded than originally considered.

[Anonymous No.7085715]

>>7085474
Nice non sequitur, argument was about anon saying emotional resposnes are a valid way of censoring content, so we should censor your faggotry since healthy men don't ike it.

>>7085561
Murder is murder. A drawing is a drawing.
I don't see the contradiction.

>>7085589
Accuse others of do what you do, while providing no insight. Calling you a nigger isn't a strawman, kill yourself.

>>7085601
>literally
>isn't literal
Ignoramus with no right to an opinion or to my effort.

[Anonymous No.7085720]

>>7085667
This was never about me, so I'm not even sure what you're inferring here. If you want my opinion, I quite literally don't give a fuck, both sides are cringe, and moralfags should be hanged.

[Anonymous No.7085729]

>>7085715
Everyday when a loli shit stain gets banned, I laugh knowing you mentally ill fucks start foaming in the mouth and start hanging yourselves.

[Anonymous No.7085738]

>>7084903
>Been told the access to doc is now restricted. I am not the doc owner so I don't have access too. If I got any update or backup I'll link in reply
Twitter niggers are so retarded, have they never heard of archive.is?

[Anonymous No.7085743]

>>7085715
>>7085720
You must be trannies if you seriously think your mental illness should have equal rights to healthy people
Seriously take meds or kys.

[Anonymous No.7085745]

>>7084933
>Honestly depends but why does morality suddenly matter now?
Rightoids are getting uppity after Trump passed FOSTA-SESTA, now Republicans want to ban all porn. Pornhub and e621 are already blocked in certain states and they're trying to push a government mandated ID to post on adult sites. It doesn't help that groomer trannies are accelerating this moral panic even further.

[Anonymous No.7085755]

>>7085715
>"NO U"
>hehe im so heckin smart
Guess i'll just start laughing when yet another loli shitter gets banned and mock retards who cry about loli not being allowed everywhee
>>7085151
good
get fucked
>>7085745
Honestly, i really do not care anymore since porn addicts are really just insufferably unreasonable exactly like trannies do and demand we all bow down to their mentall ilness or you're the bad guy.
I got all the porn i need saved up.
nsfwtard should get fucked lol

[Anonymous No.7085768]

>>7085743
>triggered over pixels
yikes

[Anonymous No.7085891]

>>7085755
>Honestly, i really do not care anymore since porn addicts are really just insufferably unreasonable exactly like trannies do and demand we all bow down to their mentall ilness or you're the bad guy.
>I got all the porn i need saved up.
>nsfwtard should get fucked lol
Then I have some more good news for you anon.

[Anonymous No.7086177]

>>7085614
Oh, I see the contraddiction, but I also acknowledge that drawing high school girls looking like kids and making porn of those is even worse. It's not about characters not being real, it's about glorification of pedophilia.

If you deny this, then you are just being disingenous.

[Anonymous No.7086221]

>>7085891
That's so funny but also obvious at the same time
>OMG NO YOU CANT JUST DO STUFF WITHOUT CONSULTING WHO HAS AN INVESTED INTEREST. STOP ASSUMING STUFF AND DONATE TO MY ONLYFANS PUSSY IN BIO!!!
It's like saying we shouldn't outlaw harmful chemicals because companies use them in products they sell or that heavy and dangerous drugs shouldn't be regulated because pharmaceutical companies make a living off of it.

What is it with porn that everyone just wants it out in the open, easy accessible for everyone and without the slightest moderation and always dies on that hill when it is already the case right now hence why people are noticing what unfiltered porn consumption is doing in the current internet era?
Pornographers and its consumers constant attempts to gaslight is pathetic and obvious as fuck and i doubt they will receive any support against any sort of ban or censorship from reasonable people or lawmakers.

If you really want to have a legit business, you should want regulation that make it difficult for bad actors to exploit you or screw over your business.
How many times have we heard of porntards getting scammed out of comms? Wouldn't happen if shit was regulated and you could lawfully demand money for your work without payment processors meddling or straight up banning your ass.
Fucking retards have so many skeletons in their closets they could be running a museum.

[Anonymous No.7086228]

if it does not involve real people then it is not a crime. The censorship of uncomfortable subjects in art is completely retarded. If you feel uncomfortable about a topic being depicted in art, then you should probably mature and learn to distinguish fiction and reality. Ultimately if you don't want to see it don't look. we don't need a namny state.
obscenity is legally undefined so it can be broadly applied. censorship is always a slippery slope. puritan ideology ends up effecting real world people who should not be effected by it.
So yeah I support drawing loli so long as no real world child is referenced by the art, even if I don't care for loli art.

[Anonymous No.7086231]

>"---therefore we should allow porn and graphic content everywhere anytime lol just close your eyes lmao"
>"ye people can be trusted to tag their shit correctly and put warnings on it"
>"lmao as if kids will ignore the warnings even though that content shouldn't be on those pages and sites anyway"
>"but kids watch that stuff anyway so what's the harm lol"
>"therefore we should just allow everything everywhere because.... it just should ok?"

[Anonymous No.7086307]

>>7086221
>What is it with porn that everyone just wants it out in the open, easy accessible for everyone and without the slightest moderation and always dies on that hill when it is already the case right now hence why people are noticing what unfiltered porn consumption is doing in the current internet era?
Distrust in the government not to use this to censor political opinions they don't agree with? You have to remember that people hate the government so much that it's the only reason this hasn't happened sooner.

[Anonymous No.7086469]

Coco is not loli. She was designed and depicted as a teenager from the start.

[Anonymous No.7087493]

>>7086231
Not my problem, I am not a child and the Internet belongs to ME.

>>7086228
What about depictions of real children who are now adults? For example, drawing Home Alone porn, despite the guy being in his 40s by this point?

In a way, there is no more direct harm to the child since he can't get pedophiled anymore.

You wouldn't be allowed to draw a rando's childhood picture as porn as this sounds more like harassment of a regular person,, but there's that thing about celebrities being public people that can be talked about freely, so would those public children be r34able?

Serious replies only.

[Anonymous No.7087496]

>>7085768
>triggered over mean words on the internet
Yikes