/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

[Anonymous No.6996084]

how can i make similair inks like this in photoshop?

[Anonymous No.6996085]

>>6996084
What brushes would i need?

[Anonymous No.6996105]

>>6996084
>>6996085
Sorry nigga but you ain't getting textures like this in digital, go pick up a pot of indian ink, a cheap calligraphy brush, a fat permanent marker, and start grinding those trad skills. Not being a purist, just being real with you.
Physical inking is easier than you think and you'll be very, very satisfied with the results.

[Anonymous No.6996108]

>>6996084
>>6996085
Photoshop lacks this kind of a brush engine. You can't have your lines thicken or thin based on the speed of your strokes, which is a crucial tool for creating those thin stroke endings.
Try Clip Studio Paint for that.

[Anonymous No.6996118]

>>6996084
CSP, G-pen tools, look for thicker ones in the store if needed, set brush opacity to 60-70%, grayscale layer.

[Anonymous No.6996121]

>>6996108
holy retard

[Anonymous No.6996124]

>>6996121
Maybe nowdays things are different. I stopped using Photoshop at CS6.
Does photoshop finally have a modifier that affects the thicknes of lines based on the speed of your strokes, my dear frustrated friend?

[Anonymous No.6996132]

>>6996124
ummm sweatie, using effete twitterspeak doesn’t make you sound less retarded

[Anonymous No.6996136]

>>6996132
I thought you were just a frustrated troll, but it seems you actually don't understand what I'm talking about?
Did you ever use CSP and customized your own brushes?
There's an option Photoshop doesn't have. At least not that I'm aware of.

The velocity modifier gives you much more natural looking brushes for doing lineart and inking.

[Anonymous No.6996138]

>the retard is doubling down

[Anonymous No.6996139]

>>6996138
Are you going to explain what's wrong with his reasoning, or will you keel gaslighting like a fucking psycho?

[Anonymous No.6996141]

>>6996121
>>6996132
>>6996138
And this is why this place is such a shithole if you are a beginner.

[Anonymous No.6996142]

>>6996136
In what world is that “natural looking”? Have you ever actually inked anything?

[Anonymous No.6996143]

>>6996142
>Have you ever actually inked anything?
Treaditionally? Yes.
I used both Photoshop and CSP extensively, and the second one gives me much more natural looking results.

[Anonymous No.6996145]

>>6996143
doubt.jpg
Literally nothing about those lines is anything approaching natural and you have next to no control judging from the hatching. WTF is that taper lmao

[Anonymous No.6996147]

>>6996139
>his
pathetic

[Anonymous No.6996148]

>>6996084
>>6996085
Specifically like this grayscale scan of inkwork?
Hard round and a lot of skill, maybe.
It's not a brush thing. Even if you had a brush that could make strokes that look exactly like that in the right hands, you don't have the right hands, because there's only one Roger_Ibáñez_Ugena.

[Anonymous No.6996158]

>>6996145
Please, explain to me what I'm talking about in your own words. I think you don't even understand what that function does.
All I got from you so far is nonsense and bitterness.

[Anonymous No.6996159]

>>6996158
Bro, it’s not a secret pro setting, stop acting like a fucking mongoloid.

[Anonymous No.6996161]

>>6996159
Finally you provided some useful info instead of just being an edgelord that should change his undies more often in order to prevent itching.
I even wrote I stopped using PS at CS6. Back then it didn't have this function.

Now try to use your brain in convos more often instead of being a cringy mad edgelord.

[Anonymous No.6996163]

>>6996161
Stop giving retarded advice, begtard.

[Anonymous No.6996168]

>>6996163
I stand corrected and now I won't give outdated info anymore. Thank you.

How about instead of being a bitter psycho, you on the other hand start providing useful advice in your 1st reply instead of requiring people to have to read through your garbage toxicity?
Go eat shit, asshole.

[Anonymous No.6996172]

>>6996168
Photoshop having velocity was never the issue, you imbecile. You’re so fucking retarded you don’t even know why you’re being called out. Fuck off back to your containment thread and stop larping.

[Anonymous No.6996216]

>>6996172
Lol, and I even gave you the benefit of the doubt. The velocity modifier was a game changer for me. If you disagree, then I guess we just have a different approach to drawing.

[Anonymous No.6996232]

>>6996216
Pure traditional lines cannot be replicated- the anon who’s been talking to you is right. Whenever you draw traditionally there’s always ink bleed and paper texture and even if monotone, different shades of black/grey due to overlaying thickness of the ink.

[Anonymous No.6996337]

Check digital artists that already do dry brush like Sara Pichelli.

[Anonymous No.6996341]

>>6996232
>Pure traditional lines cannot be replicated- the anon who’s been talking to you is right.
I never said this isn't the case. I wasn't talking about it perfectly replicating traditional media, but making it look more like traditional media.

At the time when I first tried Manga Studio (now CSP), Photoshop just wasn't as good in terms of the feeling of the brush strokes. I know it's just about pressure graphs, but the velicity modifier instantly made the strokes feel much more lifelike, because of the way the paper retains ink or graphite when we do faster or slower strokes. Photoshop was miles behind.
I'm glad they caught up. I wasn't aware of that. And honestly I would first have to try the new versions in order to tell if they actually managed to catch up

[Anonymous No.6996358]

>>6996105
>>6996108
Thanks. Ill give both of these a go.

[Anonymous No.6996397]

>>6996084
>>6996085
>>6996358
holy fuck, the linework is gonna make me coom

[Anonymous No.6996800]

>>6996341
>I never said
Literally the entire argument started with me saying >>6996136 is nothing approaching natural and you pretending it is and lying about having inked traditionally.

[Anonymous No.6996826]

>>6996084
It's so beautiful, but, damn, that face looks so fucking goofy.

[Anonymous No.6996838]

>>6996826
it looks fine if you arent anime poisoned

[Anonymous No.6996981]

>>6996084
https://martinapalazzese.gumroad.com/l/eioxf

i found these. Theyre pretty good for photoshop and i think theyll get you in the ball park, but digital will always lack some of the benefits that come with traditional.

[Anonymous No.6996987]

This guy is amazing.
here are some more.

[Anonymous No.6996989]

>>6996987

[Anonymous No.6996991]

>>6996989

[Anonymous No.6997053]

>>6996084
Maybe with their further implementation of generative AI it'll become possible to more closely imitate traditional art, digitally.

[Anonymous No.6997061]

This artstyle's fuckin magical, thank you OP

>>6997053
A year ago I would've disagreed with you but I've seen AI make some dope PC-98 style pixel art and I thought that shit'd be impossible so who knows. It's still never gonna be as sovlful as this

[Anonymous No.6997063]

>>6996085
>mogs mangakas

[Anonymous No.6997097]

>>6997063
1. most manga is shit tier visually
2. a mangaka’s job isn’t to produce ink illustrations, it’s to shit out 20 pages a week of a story that will sell

[Anonymous No.6997132]

>>6996084
You need G-pen strokes to create that kind of ink. I recommend CSP.

[Anonymous No.6997148]

Roger inks mainly with a brush, before that he inked with Microns and brushes. I've been following his work for a long time.

[Anonymous No.6997173]

>>6997063
he's mogging capeshitters too you dolt
take the eurocoomer pill

[Anonymous No.6997312]

>>6996084
This is the default bristle brush in Paint Tool Sai. I'm sure you can find or build your own "rake brush" in Photoshop. It might not be this smooth, but it doesn't have to be. You can paint the majority of your image with a regular brush, then use the rake brush on the edges of your marks later.
I would also caution against thinking the brush will do all the work for you. A lot of those scratches may not be the result of the brush, but deliberately-placed marks with a smaller brush or pen.

[Anonymous No.6997359]

>>6997063
Now ask him to keep that level of quality for 24 pages every week.

[Anonymous No.6997362]

>>6997053
>>6997061
Fuck off

[Anonymous No.6997417]

>>6996800
And my reply was that it comes closer than what I was able to achieve in PS. I never said it's recreating the exact same results as you would get with traditional media. That's something you made up and then kept gaslighting me like a fucking psycho.
I bet you are a beginner that has no idea how to draw. PYW.

[Anonymous No.6997465]

>>6996358
Sublime

[Anonymous No.6997513]

>>6997312
>A lot of those scratches may not be the result of the brush, but deliberately-placed marks with a smaller brush or pen.
Thats what Ive been wanting to avoid. lately, ive gotten to a point of outright drawing the brushstroke instead of having a brush that does it in one stroke. feels like a cheat and less fun.
nice work tho.

[Anonymous No.6997747]

>>6997053
Hmm kill yourself

[Anonymous No.6997751]

>>6997747
I won't and I'll most likely outlive you. How does that make you feel?

[Anonymous No.6997809]

>>6997312
I could recognize that inking anyday. Do you still only use SAI or is it just a preference among others?

[Anonymous No.6997811]

>>6997809
Would you recognize me if I was just a stranger on the bus trying to make my way home?

[Anonymous No.6997923]

>>6997063
vagabond exists. so does gon.