/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

[Anonymous No.6965798]

Have you drawn the new FOTM, anon?
You don't want to miss out on those free followers don't you?

[Anonymous No.6965806]

>>6965798
Followers are cringe. Too busy playing videogames

[Anonymous No.6965810]

I actually like the design of this one (not like that bowsette monstrosity, or latest lame seasonal anime girl), but I think I'm just too spiteful and too ornery to trend hop

[Anonymous No.6965813]

>>6965798
I know I'm doing a disservice to myself, but I hate shallow fotm shit so fucking much.

[Anonymous No.6965814]

>>6965798
I have 3 followers and 100+ hot singles in my area followers

[Anonymous No.6965821]

>>6965798
I might draw her, I have no social media though.

[Anonymous No.6965825]

>>6965810
Either make actual good content or make fotm shit. Considering your response, your art is garbage

[Anonymous No.6965831]

>>6965825
Projecting. I'll keep making good "content," thanks

[Anonymous No.6965835]

>>6965798
this might be the only version of this dogshit design that I've liked so far

[Anonymous No.6965841]

>>6965798

[Anonymous No.6965842]

>>6965831
Not projecting, artist who don’t rely on fotm month, either make animations, games, or have comics revolving their ocs. You don’t do any of those, just another white void shit.

[Anonymous No.6965843]

>>6965842
>muh OCs, muh games
You're just another flavor of algo-junkie, you literally can't conceive of art as other than product.

[Anonymous No.6965848]

>>6965842
>You don’t do any of those, just another white void shit.
nta, can I borrow your psychic powers?

[Anonymous No.6965852]

>>6965798
I think her design is great and i've liked a couple of fanart but I don't really want to draw her. I have too much I want to draw with my current hyperfixations as it is.

[Anonymous No.6965853]

>>6965848
Dude's just being an assmad fag. He obviously can't know what my art looks like, but my original must have touched a nerve.

[Anonymous No.6965856]

>>6965843
You say that, yet you want to be popular and get a following. If you didn’t, you wouldn’t be bitching about “trend hopping” and being hesitant on drawing her because of some “pride”
>>6965848
>nta, can I borrow your psychic powers?
You get it by drawing a lot

[Anonymous No.6965860]

I genuinely dont understand /ic/'s condescending, passive aggressive and petty nature towards FotM characters. They are popular, people draw them for engagement, who cares.
You guys are seriously obsessed with being outraged over the dumbest of things.

[Anonymous No.6965862]

>>6965856
>yet you want to be popular and get a following
Who doesn't?
>you wouldn’t be bitching about “trend hopping” and being hesitant on drawing her because of some “pride”
Literal npc meme thinking. Am I talking with an AI right now? You really have no artist's pride?
I'll get there by my hands, or not. Not drawing your faggot memes, ever, that is all.

[Anonymous No.6965864]

>>6965856
I draw at least 3 hours every day, up to 10 on my days off

[Anonymous No.6965871]

>>6965860
>t. pandering whore hopping from cock to cock before the next current thing.
I have much more respect for artists who invest time effort and energy drawing their obscure OC, at least they're attempting to be creative and original instead of being the equivalent of a bitch taking dick from the highest bidder.

[Anonymous No.6965880]

>>6965860
Crabs hate to see others being successful.

[Anonymous No.6965882]

>>6965880
It's not your success, you retard. Do you seriously not see that? It's the stupid fucking character you're drawing pulling all the weight, the character you don't even have any attachment to.
I can attest to this from personal experience. If you draw fotm, you get a flood of cumbrain followers who don't give two shits about your real art. It's literally not worth it, unless trendfagging is all you ever plan to do, in which case you deserve all my derision.

[Anonymous No.6965883]

>>6965862
So you want to be popular, but don’t want to put in the actual effort for it. So you’re just another whiny entitled shitter.
> I'll get there by my hands, or not. Not drawing your faggot memes, ever, that is all.
Then do that, instead of bitching about trend hopping and getting popular. Getting a following should be the least of your worries if you actually do have artistic pride

[Anonymous No.6965884]

>>6965798
The only reason I don't do stuff like this is because it's no different than drawing porn for follows, if you aren't successful from doing it, you basically just wasted a shitload of creative energy making something you don't even care about. I don't mind FotM so long as the character is something I was going to draw anyway, but that never happens.

[Anonymous No.6965888]

>>6965883
>drawing
>bitching
I'll do both and you can go kill yourself. You're obviously offended by my original comment because it hit a little too close to home, despite your denials. Which character from a show you didn't watch did you draw, huh?

[Anonymous No.6965893]

>>6965882
ok crab

[Anonymous No.6965895]

>>6965871
>>t. pandering whore hopping from co
to another faggot with that bullshit, in all my years of social media gaming I have NEVER hopped on a trend unless it's an old trend like the fucking virgin killer sweater, so dont give me that crap.
Besides, me criticizing this god forsaken board for being a petty bitch when it comes to FotM characters has nothing to do with me (or anyone) drawing them or not. I repeat, they are popular and people draw them for engagement, who the fuck cares what people do with their asses?
>I have much more respect for artists who invest time effort and energy drawing their obscure OC
Son of a bitch, that is literally what *I* do. And yet I've gotten criticized several times just for drawing my character, so which is it??

>>6965882
I agree with this wholeheartedly. Relying solely on trends is like fishing with bait, but without a hook.

[Anonymous No.6965906]

>>6965895
Ok hotshot let's see your work and OC then.

[Anonymous No.6965915]

>>6965888
Considering your responses, it’s easy to tell you’re assblasted right now. Just another shitter that gets mad that people are getting popular from fotm, while you don’t.
>Which character from a show you didn't watch did you draw, huh?
I just draw characters i’m mostly interested in, popular or not. You on the other hand can’t because you’re too worried if they are popular or not.

[Anonymous No.6965918]

>>6965915
>I just draw characters i’m mostly interested in, popular or not.
he finally admits lmao
now die

[Anonymous No.6965920]

>>6965860
struck a nerve?

[Anonymous No.6965921]

>>6965918
Finally admit to drawing characters i’m interested regardless of popularity? All you did was seethe through out this thread and only care about popularity. Make art worth following and maybe you wouldn’t be this assblasted

[Anonymous No.6965924]

>>6965921
I bet your timeline is full of fan art. Not one single fresh idea. Don't answer, just reflect on it.

[Anonymous No.6965928]

>>6965860
>I genuinely dont understand
Then let me explain
>be guy
>only draw popular shit to get attention
>you're merely performing the act of drawing as a potential substitute for wageslaving and social success, since the endgame is always trying to sell your very much "commercial art" of popular and known IPs to normies
>all because you just didn't want to pick something you might like doing, but end up poisoning a niche/community/industry, simply for your own gain
>now multiply this by every fotm shitter and you get a whole industry of outright grifters which leaves no room for genuine people wanting to do genuine things, since also consumers EXPECT fotm slop to be served to them, drowning out or alienating genuine fans of any media
Fotm characters are popular because the average consumers expects porn, and when new flavor comes out, they want new porn.
Fotm is the epitome of consumeristic culture and anyone with an ounce of a personality should be appalled by this shit.

[Anonymous No.6965930]

>>6965924
Full of fresh ideas like your white void shit and that no one likes?

[Anonymous No.6965936]

>Have you drawn the new FOTM, anon?
Never.
>You don't want to miss out on those free followers don't you?
I don't care about them.

[Anonymous No.6965940]

>>6965798
How is there no AI-slop model of her yet? Not enough artwork to steal from yet?

[Anonymous No.6965942]

>>6965930
Nigger, where do you keep getting this white void thing from. Twitter loves white void girls, it's catnip to them. You might as well say to "uh, like those shitty twinkies you consume??" to a fitness nut criticizing the modern American diet. Absolute fanart sloppa mong.

[Anonymous No.6965958]

>>6965942
Anon, you already admit you can’t draw anything that people actually like. There are people who’s art is trash or considerd “trash” yet many people like it because of the ideas. You can’t replicate any of it, so you blame fotm instead of your abilities. You don’t actually like drawing and it shows

[Anonymous No.6965965]

>>6965958
nta but let's be honest. what people like is independent of the intrinsic technical qualities of the pieces.

[Anonymous No.6965967]

>>6965798
I don't see why, for social media marketing purposes, you wouldn't post at least one FOTM piece per month, unless you are maybe doing a webcomic or something and have deadlines to meet for subscribers who already pay you, or the FOTM is from a fanbase you want to avoid (especially if they skew younger and don't spend money)

[Anonymous No.6965969]

>>6965958
>Anon, you already admit you can’t draw anything that people actually like.
I didn't admit that...
I've done fan art (not fotm), I know how pointless it is, if you actually have genuinely original ideas. 10,000 coomer likes are worth a nickel. Totally hollow feeling. Doing exciting and new art is hard and worthwhile, fan art and trends are easy and gay.
You're only offended by this assertion because your is full of shit you don't care about

[Anonymous No.6965973]

>>6965958
>>6965969
both of you pyw

[Anonymous No.6965976]

>>6965973
My shit's not generic enough for me to be able to get away with that
Just check any booru site for what the fanartfag does

[Anonymous No.6965990]

>>6965976
yeah I see who you are

[Anonymous No.6965997]

>>6965860
/ic/ is really a vent board. when someone is getting mad it's something they've held down for a while and want to blow steam. this is healthy.

[Anonymous No.6966001]

>>6965969
You keep saying I’m offended when you been seething through out this thread about not being popular, come on now. You never cared about the drawing anything worthwhile, when all you do is bitch about fotm and popularity. It’s even sad enough that you don’t want to draw character you’re interested because they are trending. Instead of those hollow feelings you have, you now have envy and spiteful ones instead

[Anonymous No.6966004]

>>6966001
I'm not interested in her. What parts I am interested, I'd take and make something better, more personalized. Gee, guess I'm just on a different level than you, anon, sorry about that

[Anonymous No.6966009]

>>6966004
>>6965810
No need lie to yourself like that, but if that’s how you want to cope, so be it. Get better ideas and you’ll get the popularity you so desperately wanted.

[Anonymous No.6966015]

>>6966009
working on it

[Anonymous No.6966021]

arguing/flaming on ic of all places is so embarrassing. google sayre's law

[Anonymous No.6966039]

>>6965798
this mf has the biggest follower growth ive seen in years and his commisions are still 90$, are taxes really that bad in S Korea?

[Anonymous No.6966044]

>>6966039
>biggest follower growth ive seen in years
you don't see many. but he has grown in popularity

[Anonymous No.6966047]

>>6966039
>this mf has the biggest follower growth ive seen in years
Good, his art is nice.

[Anonymous No.6966048]

>>6965798
I've never drawn FOTM but I want draw this one because I really, really like the design. Is drawing popular stuff even helping? I'd think it actually makes it harder since you're suddenly competing with every artist and their mother instead of just doing your own thing. I don't think this will bet me any quality followers

[Anonymous No.6966053]

>>6965798
No, I draw requests for my Patrons. I prefer to be able to pay my bills and mortgage.

[Anonymous No.6966062]

Wait, aren't we already too late? At this point people are probably annoyed by the character

[Anonymous No.6966066]

lmao @ this retard's 5 minutes of fame

[Anonymous No.6966068]

>>6965860
/ic/, like most of 4chan really, is full of chinless contrarians who think they are too "cool" and "indie" to join the masses, normal people and their trends are beneath them.

[Anonymous No.6966072]

>>6966048
>>6963897
Is drawing popular stuff even helping? Yes

[Anonymous No.6966075]

>>6966066
I was wondering why Nintendo would have sanctioned that, turned out they didn't. What the fuck was he thinking? Was he just ready to quit his job or something? Couldn't contain his urges? Thought he'd get away with it? I don't get it

[Anonymous No.6966077]

>>6966068
Someone thinking they were too cool for school is how you got the art you now consoom in the first place, just remember that

[Anonymous No.6966079]

>>6966072 That artist you linked was very early, has good art and is probably already popular.

[Anonymous No.6966082]

>>6966068
Must have felt really cathartic to dunk on that strawman. I'm unironically envious of the dopamine you're feeling right now

[Anonymous No.6966174]

>>6965906
Here, Im pretty sure I dont need to tell you which one is the OC here. I genuinely never hopped on a trend because, even if Im interested, it feels kind of iffy to do (I guess you faggots have brainrotten me into thinking it's a wrong thing to do even if you are into the idea).

>>6965928
That is a very compelling explanation about the disingenuity of online artists and all, but you didnt answer my question. Im going to put it like this: given all this knowledge you have about this subject, you guys decide to act in the most insufferable way possible while barely informing others about this topic.
So I ask: why do you people feel the visceral need to act like the pettiest bitches on the block over people, that you are not associated with, drawing FotM characters?

>>6965997
>>6966068
These are the most reasonable responses on this question so far. I dont deny a lot of artists are disingenuous about trends and stuff, it sucks, but it's not something to act so full of yourself for.
>haha! look at me! I dont follow trends unlike the mobs on NPCs! Im above everyone else!!
Say what you will about the topic, this attitude is abysmally stupid.

[Anonymous No.6966180]

>>6965798
Yes

>>6965841
https://youtu.be/80YFtnTBApU?feature=shared

[Anonymous No.6966202]

>>6965860
like so many other boards, /ic/ slowly got co-opted since the meme/culture wars exploded, but exploded during the pandemic, by the usual suspects that began with a T and assume that they rely partain of the chromosome x gender despite not being so, as such, banning and threatening users over the stupidiest non-provocations you could imagine, or just for stuff they dont like in threads, thus stripping the meaning of the boards, plus they absolutely hate the concept of fun, creating an aura that only attracts bitter shitposters who just harras and flame all around

[Anonymous No.6966204]

>>6966202
>speaking like you know the board while trying to use spoilers

[Anonymous No.6966210]

>>6966204
Cause they disable it?

[Anonymous No.6966233]

>>6965841
based

[Anonymous No.6966243]

>>6966202
you sound like you use /pol/ too much given how you assume trannies are behind everything.

[Anonymous No.6966246]

>>6966243
t.cries in every loli thread

[Anonymous No.6966264]

>>6965798
that axe head looks funny

[Anonymous No.6966331]

Nobody else posted WaPeach in this shitty thread. Boo.

[Anonymous No.6966403]

Wapeach looks freaking retarded

[Anonymous No.6966410]

>>6966403
There's a reason why it went unused.
It looks like shit. Pales in comparison to gigachad Waluigi

[Anonymous No.6966419]

>>6966174
>why do you people feel the visceral need to act like the pettiest bitches on the block over people, that you are not associated with, drawing FotM characters?
You read text and filter it through your own inner voice filtered through the projection of your own insecurities, if anything.
I don't assume anything you might be feeling right now but i can safely assume you might be underage or just immature.

You wanted an explanation, take it or shit your pants, retard.

[Anonymous No.6966514]

>>6966419
>uhhh we didnt say it like that your just insecureeee
Sure, and I was born yesterday. Dont be ridiculous.
You just dont read words the way you find it convenient to you depending on some psychological mumbo jumbo, that's not how communication works. The tone of voice is placed specifically to drive the tone or mood of the idea we communicate influenced by how it's worded, whether it's casual, formal, friendly, or -in this case- condescending.

Saying something like "Trendy characters give free followers, you should try drawing them" is not the same as saying something like "Surely you wont miss the free followers from drawing Trendy characters, right?" despite of the objective of the messages being pretty much the same because the tone of voice is shifted from encouraging to condescending.
And that is for this example alone, but when it comes to this topic as a whole, this condescending and petty nature is all over the place and it shows for the way you faggots word yourselves.

[Anonymous No.6966642]

>>6966514
>"i assign voices to what i read, therefore it must be true"
Anon, it's fucking text on the screen.

Do you read the absolute teenage projections your write? You reveal you are highly insecure when you try to assign an emotion to text, because however you perceive ---TEXT ON A SCREEN--- as, says more about you.
>I was born yesterday
Nigga, you're fucking retarded.

[Anonymous No.6966671]

>>6965798
Twitter artists jumping on every FoTM bandwagon are the worst. There's nothing more insincere than doing these shit, next to probably memeing about having low engagement/followers

[Anonymous No.6966692]

>>6965860
It feels fake as hell.

[Anonymous No.6966699]

>>6966642
>Anon, it's fucking text on the screen.
Alright, Im going to give you and your "muh projection" babble the benefit of the doubt and assume you really dont know what a "tone of voice" is supposed to mean in this context.
>Voice refers to the author's unique writing style, while tone refers to the author's attitude or emotion towards the subject matter. To identify voice and tone, consider factors such as the author's use of humor, sarcasm, or irony, as well as their choice of words and sentence structure.
Basically, tone of voice refers to the mood, personality and feeling you, as the writer, assign to a piece of writing, which is based on how you structure your sentences and the way you communicate your ideas.
As an example:
>"Please do your chores." has a calm and imperative tone of voice.
>"Do your chores now!!" has an aggressive and imposing tone of voice.

Contrary to your belief, Tone of voice is not us, the readers, assigning an inner voice to a piece of text based on our own psychological perception of reality, but rather it's the author setting a specific mood to a text using basic communication techniques that the reader picks up. If you mess up the tone of voice, that's not a problem of the reader, that's a problem of the writer.
Is that clear or should I get the crayons?

[Anonymous No.6966720]

>>6966699
>he assigns
>a tone of voice
>over text
>others write
>"no, im not projecting"
You quite basically, virtually, literally, absolutely are doing that, Anon.

Do i need to tell you, give you government approved declarations of my intent to just relay to you this information as neutrally as possible and even write memos about what i'm currently feeling at each word i write? Maybe i should hire a psychiatrist who also will send you my mood-charts after each and every post.

Also, of course, you're so heckin valid and special, Anon.
hguh and kosseks anun
>that's a problem of the writer.
Don't give me that pretentious bs you're using to deflect that you're retarded.
>Is that clear or should I get the crayons?
Well, if you're asking, pull em out. Or am i conveniently being sarcastic now or seething coping or whatever?
Anon, what am i feeling right now? You can probably tell, no?

[Anonymous No.6966722]

WAHHH WAHHH WAHHH

JUST FUCKING DRAW HER YOU FAGGOT

easy way to get some extra followers and youre instead posting retarded shit on 4chan, its not even a complicated design

[Anonymous No.6966723]

>>6965798
Why is there a Wapeach lmao

[Anonymous No.6966737]

>>6966720
Either you didnt read or you are too retarded to understand what I just explained. I genuinely want to believe you didnt read and you're just messing with me, because your whole argument evolving into 4chan verbose in the middle of it gives me that idea.
Im going to leave this at that, have yourself a (You) and continue being a retardo around le heckin forchan.
>Anon, what am i feeling right now? You can probably tell, no?
Tone of voice doesnt have anything to do with how the writer feels, but if you ask me, you give me the impression you are kind of sort of assblasted right now kek.
Cheers, anon.

[Anonymous No.6966769]

>>6966737
>ur mad 4chan verbosity hmm y arent u agreein with me hmmm must b trolling or retarded
And there you have it.
Assigning whatever you want to things others posts is pretty convenient, isn't it?

Anon, the moment the whole conversation with another person happens inside your own head or give some random posts some head canons, you are projecting, in the very sense of the word, therefore you are the one revealing your own emotions.
>but i explained
Anon, if i wanted to read a book about characters and shit, i would read a book.
Who the fuck are you and why should i even give half-a-shit about how you feel at every second of your life?

btw the mood i'm setting is:
>shrug

[Anonymous No.6966960]

>>6965798
Too busy drawing female Rigby's ass.

[Anonymous No.6966970]

>>6965798
I drew it for fun in my trad sketchbook, the original design is pretty cute. I never post anything online but that's because I'm self conscious about it and don't want to tie myself down to a brand or anything. I don't mind fomo posters desu

[Anonymous No.6967080]

>>6966068
There's a difference between hypocritical contrarianism and picking a niche you genuinelly like and sticking to it.
If darkwave and art deco become mainstream again I won't suddenly start liking reggaeton and corporate memphis instead. I might scoff at the most dickless commercial attempts at it, but would still enjoy the sudden increase in production of the thing I like.

[Anonymous No.6967179]

>>6966723
Super Mario Tennis concept art leak

[Anonymous No.6967236]

>>6966960
Show

[Anonymous No.6967245]

>>6966410
True, Waluigi is hella iconic

[Anonymous No.6967265]

>>6966737
get a trip please

[Anonymous No.6968063]

>>6966960
>That one animation whete Benson tells him to "throw it back"

[Anonymous No.6968186]

>>6966072
I drew her today and the post didn't do much better than my usual uploads. I firmly believe that form is useless. If you're a big account you'll get numbers anyway. If you're a small account you'll get drowned in all the other, better and more popular fotm stuff

[Anonymous No.6968187]

>>6966970
Can you share your sketch here?

[Anonymous No.6968204]

I generally get 10 likes in my pics
I made a fotm girl, got 1650 likes and 500rtw, some followers
Then a week later I posted another pic of mine, did 10 likes
That's the current state of twitter, and whoever tells you otherwise it's lying

[Anonymous No.6968239]

>>6968204
Your post aren’t engaging enough. I have 1k followers and when i post oc shit, i get a 100 or 200 likes, fanart 600-2k likes. Also, try to retweet people every now a then, you get more followers that and likes that way

[Anonymous No.6968255]

>>6968239
It is bad to lie anon.

[Anonymous No.6968264]

>>6968255
Not lying though, i can send you the metrics

[Anonymous No.6968265]

>>6965798
tf is that

[Anonymous No.6968273]

>>6968239
>Your post aren’t engaging enough
not him but how do you make it more engaging?

[Anonymous No.6968304]

>>6968273
You do that by getting the characters you draw by interacting with different things. Gimmicks like waifus eating food, shitposts, or small comics. Doing such things will help you or just be highly skilled like hungry clicker

[Anonymous No.6968333]

>>6968264
Post a link to your tweet

[Anonymous No.6968347]

>>6968333
I’m not linking my account here, this non-fanart shit

[Anonymous No.6968594]

>>6965798
Reminder Mossacannibalis used to draw loli porn and guro art of western cartoons (and still does over on his Fanbox). His normie followers will eat him alive over this eventually.

[Anonymous No.6968599]

>>6965860
Of course a faggot who posts vtumors would say that

[Anonymous No.6969588]

>>6968594
Don't think he has any normie followers, everyone I know who knows him is some sort of abusefag.

[Anonymous No.6969590]

>>6969588
Dude draws female coomer and the fem version of billion must die fker. No normie is really into that.

[Anonymous No.6969600]

>>6965860
I don’t draw fan art, really ever. Only OC works. I am a hobbyist and have a job doing something else. Sometimes I really like a character so I will draw them but it’s not really ever a popular one. Most people on this board though are just seething fags. They can’t comprehend someone might just genuinely like the FotM and want to draw it just because. But also, for anyone inspiring for a career in art there is really no reason to disadvantage yourself by opting to not shill out for some self imposed moral righteousness. There is no room for fag shit in the rat race. Artist are just more prone to emotional retardation than other demographics, hence all the whining.

[Anonymous No.6969615]

>>6965860
/ic/ is a closed and relatively small community. it's pretty similar to tumblr, discord, and reddit when you get this small.
of course it's obvious you'd expect overdramatic drama whores who love spouting their pretentious opinions on these types of places.
in reality, literally nobody cares at all. it takes too much effort to care about something this unsubstantial.

[Anonymous No.6971064]

I did say I never hopped on trends before and figured this was not going to be the exception, specially with /ic/ essentially being bitchy about this character, I figured, for some retarded reason, I shouldnt do it.
Then I remember I have a blondie bias and this is the kind of shit I would do. Let this be the first and last time I almost let you faggots gastlight me lmao.

>>6969600
>Most people on this board though are just seething fags. They can’t comprehend someone might just genuinely like the FotM and want to draw it just because.
This is something I learned midway through this chibis, that if you want to draw a character, no one has any business telling you otherwise, or acting high and mighty about how drawing X or Y is wrong, it's stupid and even more stupid that it took me this long to figure that out.
>for anyone inspiring for a career in art there is really no reason to disadvantage yourself by opting to not shill out for some self imposed moral righteousness.
I mean, as long as it makes you feel better about yourself and it doesnt *greatly* affect your PR, being honest with your opinions isnt a bad thing. Then again one thing is voicing yourself at moderated degrees with compelling opinions at times it's relevant and a different one is being an opinionated fag that vomits nonsense consistently and without regard of time or even words.

>>6969615
>of course it's obvious you'd expect overdramatic drama whores who love spouting their pretentious opinions on these types of places.
I dont know, I wouldnt expect to see many opinionated idiots in such a small community on a regular...
>in reality, literally nobody cares at all. it takes too much effort to care about something this unsubstantial.
Another thing it took me this long to figure out, Im keeping that last bit in mind.

[Anonymous No.6971143]

>>6968594
That's hot

[Anonymous No.6971688]

>>6965856
>>6965860
I hate this shitty character thanks to the trannies that literally adopted her as if she was always a real Nintendo character ot the point she's cross contaminating Wario and Waluigi now. If the "fanbase" wasn't cancer I'd likely draw her but I'd wouldn't have draw the design that was leaked out, as I already didn't like it for what it was, and now that it's everywhere I really have no erason to draw her anytime whatsoever.

Doing something while its "hot" to me shows you don't actually care about the character or idea, just numbers for your shitty gallery. I like drawing things I like, nuff said. Last thing I want is faggot coombrains that never cared about my work only showing up because of some shitty loli fotm and then will drop me on a dime when I stop drawing that dumb bitch.

[Anonymous No.6971696]

>>6971064
Did pic related do well? Post numbers

[Anonymous No.6971817]

>>6971688
>thanks to the trannies that literally adopted her as if she was always a real Nintendo character ot the point she's cross contaminating Wario and Waluigi now.
Really? I started to like her for that exact same reason kek. It's a nice breath of fresh air since Bowsette because people are treating her more in line with the Mario canon. Also, on the bright side, that also gives Wario and Waluigi more engagement and art by extension.
>Doing something while its "hot" to me shows...
>If the "fanbase" wasn't cancer...
Believe what you want to believe, I guess. If you want to cut yourself from having fun simply because you believe ill of everyone around you, that's completely up to you. You will have your misery complaining, I will have my fun drawing.

>>6971696
Havent posted it yet, Im still pondering about it or waiting for the "right time" to post it. I did post everything else I had on my gallery and it obviously didnt go stellar or anything, it sucks, but it's to be expected with 1.3k and nothing real to engage. I got to see some of my regular followers engage, though, and that is enough for me. Also if I post it and it makes numbers, I already have my blondie set to greet the new people, which gives them a reason to engage past the Warupichu craze.

[Anonymous No.6973335]

>>6971696
Update for you who asked.
The post actually did numbers.
We gonn' makin' it, bruhs!

[Anonymous No.6973769]

>>6965798
here' a hot take, the reason designs become fotm is because they are well designed and fun to draw so even if people are doing it for views or are fake fans or whatever, the only reason it caught on was because of enough initial artists who liked the design and thought it would be fun to draw. Basically good designs will generally be chosen so they deserve the clout even if they appeal to coomers most of the time.

[Anonymous No.6973847]

>>6965798
I am not interested in wapeach, so I am not drawing her, but I don't begrudge other people for having fun.

[Anonymous No.6973916]

>>6965798
On a side-note, I looked back at my follower count in 2021 versus in 2023
In 2021 my Pixiv followers was 15k
In 2023 my Pixiv follower is 30k. Earlier this year it was 25k.
We're all gonna make it bros

[Anonymous No.6973989]

>>6971688
>Doing something while its "hot" to me shows you don't actually care about the character or idea, just numbers for your shitty gallery. I like drawing things I like, nuff said.
>Last thing I want is faggot coombrains that never cared about my work only showing up because of some shitty loli fotm and then will drop me on a dime when I stop drawing that dumb bitch.
Based and reasonable.
Only ones who would disagree are coomers and trannies who just want free art.

Remember, they hate anyone who is a genuine person that can't be groomed and manipulated into doing their bidding.
All the retards defending that shit, wouldn't even look at those characters if they weren't a potential tool to get social media clout and attention.

[Anonymous No.6974011]

>>6973769
>blah blah blah appeal
more likely explanation
it's a Mario character

[Anonymous No.6974104]

>>6969590
Twitter users are normies

[Anonymous No.6974114]

>>6965798
LE SIGH.
>>6965841
Whats this circus thing about? I've seen japs drawing this obviously western thing is all I know.
It's probably something cringe.

[Anonymous No.6974124]

>>6965798
Make sure you don't make porn of the child-coded design, Wapeach, m'kay tendie?

[Anonymous No.6974133]

>>6965798
i muted it

[Anonymous No.6974573]

>>6974124
Making these kind of posts should land you in the lonney bin immediately.

[Anonymous No.6974588]

>>6965852
You’re naive. You think hard work alone is enough to get by in the world today. It’s not. You’ll learn one day that you’ll have to make sacrifices. Cant have your cake and eat it too.