>>6943623
Yeah, PIXIV is good and doesn't rely as much on new content to drive all of your growth as Twitter, where if you don't get a rush of engagement in the first couple hours the post is effectively DOA. Pixiv submissions on the other hand can be slow burns, where it takes it a while to get bookmarks/likes, but then after a few days will start to jump up, because while of course it still has an algorithm for displaying your art in peoples' suggestions, it being a gallery site with tags means that your art will stay alive for a while after the initial post as people browse for specific things.