I agree with both sides, though I find the artist's side more palatable:
- Naming the piece "vanity", like it's a social commentary on the woman's sexuality, whilst also drawing it in such a way as for us, the audience, to leer at her ass is pretty fucking stupid. However...
- Getting so bent out of shape over it is equally fucking stupid. Perhaps the artist just drew a good study and decided to give it a "deep" name to give it meaning? Perhaps he didn't think of the sexuality, and was only naming it based on the phone?
There's also her critique on him not drawing the face, despite all the features of the face being there, albeit draw lightly.
She wrote a fucking novel to critique this dude/dudette, but at the same time calls it boring? Sure had a lot to say about a 'boring' piece, dipshit. Speaking of boring, they're entire argument is essentially based on the quote they wrote up-top, so their argument isn't even really their own... and they call other people boring? How lazy. Fuck off.
And I just realised after writing all this, the artist didn't even name it 'Vanity', it was called "phone addiction", so was the artist even making a commentary about sexuality at all? Christ! What a dipshit!