Normies are gushing over this on twitter saying it is brand new art style. Do you agree? Have you seen anything like it before?

File: 628 KB, 1792x1792, media_F5tdHIyaQAAcJOK.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

Anonymous Sat Sep 16 02:45:01 2023 No.6844119 [Reply] [Original]

Normies are gushing over this on twitter saying it is brand new art style. Do you agree? Have you seen anything like it before?

>>	Anonymous Sat Sep 16 02:47:10 2023 No.6844120 File: 347 KB, 572x614, look.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Sat Sep 16 02:52:41 2023 No.6844126 composition is not style

>>	Anonymous Sat Sep 16 03:02:25 2023 No.6844135 >>6844119 no, but normies having fun and expressing artistically is always great.

>>	Anonymous Sat Sep 16 03:10:48 2023 No.6844137 >>6844119 trippy

>>	Anonymous Sat Sep 16 03:12:37 2023 No.6844138 >ai trash Kill yourself op >>6844120 >It would take years to get to the level of painting ability that would let you do something like this lmaooo

>>	Anonymous Sat Sep 16 03:12:46 2023 No.6844139 >what is surrealism

>>	Anonymous Sat Sep 16 03:13:25 2023 No.6844140 File: 18 KB, 607x582, 1552411933799.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6844119 I prefer styles with a more subtle nature.

>>	Anonymous Sat Sep 16 03:19:45 2023 No.6844143 >>6844140 Is this an antisemitism something?

>>	Anonymous Sat Sep 16 03:23:03 2023 No.6844145 >>6844120 It’s just eyvind Earle but crappier

>>	Anonymous Sat Sep 16 03:24:18 2023 No.6844146 File: 1.04 MB, 1558x1541, M.C.-Escher-stairs1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6844119 > who is M.C. Escher?

>>	Anonymous Sat Sep 16 03:24:36 2023 No.6844147 File: 4 KB, 368x376, gleeful abstraction.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6844143 Of course not.

>>	Anonymous Sat Sep 16 03:24:58 2023 No.6844149 I have seen a spiral before, I know, that may be shocking to hear.

>>	Anonymous Sat Sep 16 03:26:01 2023 No.6844151 >>6844149 Spirals like you’ve never seen them before

>>	Anonymous Sat Sep 16 03:36:58 2023 No.6844157 >>6844119 normies dont know anything about art or art history, they are easily impressed same as when normies who dont read books think harry potter is literary masterpiece or that marvel movies are good its all ignorance

Anonymous Sat Sep 16 03:42:49 2023 No.6844161

>>6844119
Looks like those Don Quixote paintings that if you see them from far away it looks like a face, but you see it up close and it's like a scene from the book.
>>6844157
>same as when normies who dont read books think harry potter is literary masterpiece
I've seen bits and pieces of the movies over the years but never actually sat through one and I think I'll never will, tried reading one of the books this year actually and quitted halfway through, it's a book for five year olds, normies are honestly retarded.
>marvel movies are good
Some are, but in the fun action flick way. Some are just dumb.

Anonymous Sat Sep 16 05:38:00 2023 No.6844236
File: 1.84 MB, 750x750, F6E87IUX0AARUss.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>6844119
doing this shit by hand wouldn't be practical, AI allows creators to explore that kind of shit. i'd expect much more new stuff in the next decades, until AI will finally become accepted even by the most die-hard ludditards

Anonymous Sat Sep 16 06:02:21 2023 No.6844256
File: 97 KB, 700x874, 44781092_1058906730954826_4427524474377958009_n-5c92dd8dc8f94__700.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

People tend to paint faces with this technique. checkerboards and spiral masks have probably been done but nothing comes to mind.

>>	Anonymous Sat Sep 16 06:07:13 2023 No.6844257 >>6844236 >doing this shit by hand wouldn't be practical You wouldn't know because you don't draw.

>>	Anonymous Sat Sep 16 06:15:07 2023 No.6844263 >>6844119 I feel bad for human artists but I also think this is really cool. Kinda conflicted as someone who draws but also loves AI.

Anonymous Sat Sep 16 06:19:37 2023 No.6844268
File: 377 KB, 1652x1399, magic-eye-have-fun-in-3d-9781524885779_hr.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>6844119
Normies love optical illusions and other gimmicks. I remember when "Magic Eye" books and posters were all the rage, every store had a rack of 'em. Now if you weren't alive in the mid-90s you probably don't know what the fuck "Magic Eye" is.

>>	Anonymous Sat Sep 16 06:23:27 2023 No.6844272 It's ugly and I don't care for it.

Anonymous Sat Sep 16 06:25:54 2023 No.6844274
File: 80 KB, 750x382, ships-bridge-water-1935844740.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>6844119
>>6844120
It's hardly "brand new" - optical allusions in paintings have been around for yonks. I forget the name of the artist, but there's a children's book artist, and they do these visual tricks where windows turns into people or a bridge in the distance turns into a boat and clouds (picrel).

That said, the patterns are very clean, and the impact is a lot stronger what I've seen in other works.
This kind of stuff is what I'd been hoping people would use AI to make, an art style that is either impractical or nigh impossible for human artists to make, even with digital tools.
Though, these pictures are still well within the realm of easily made by a human (despite their claims), but we're getting close now.

>>	Anonymous Sat Sep 16 06:27:27 2023 No.6844276 >>6844268 a dragon!

>>	Anonymous Sat Sep 16 06:37:07 2023 No.6844280 File: 9 KB, 323x313, chrischan disguise.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6844263

>>	Anonymous Sat Sep 16 06:48:33 2023 No.6844292 >>6844236 I think when 3D generators get more sophisticated we'll see some real crazy shit by combining them as a controlnet with stable diffusion. The animations we see right now from animatediff will be considered cave paintings.

>>	Anonymous Sat Sep 16 06:56:11 2023 No.6844295 File: 2.40 MB, 1920x1080, lascaux.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6844292 >cave paintings cave paintings are amazing and better than anything AI will ever produce. I don't think you tech-tards get it.

>>	Anonymous Sat Sep 16 06:56:14 2023 No.6844296 https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2023/09/us-rejects-ai-copyright-for-famous-state-fair-winning-midjourney-art/ You faggots can't take a hint can you?

>>	Anonymous Sat Sep 16 06:58:38 2023 No.6844298 Why can't you guys just admit when something is good? I get it, you don't like AI. Guess what, I don't like most artists I've ever had the (dis)pleasure to interact with, I can still appreciate their art and admit that what they create is cool.

>>	Anonymous Sat Sep 16 07:00:32 2023 No.6844299 >>6844298 is it that unfathomable to you that some people don't find this cool or impressive in the slightest

>>	Anonymous Sat Sep 16 07:06:08 2023 No.6844302 >>6844295 You didn't even try to make this one look like a real cave painting

>>	Anonymous Sat Sep 16 07:11:15 2023 No.6844305 >>6844298 Half the posts in this thread are positive or neutral, so shut the fuck up you little pot stirrer.

>>	Anonymous Sat Sep 16 07:13:15 2023 No.6844307 >>6844151 W-woah..

>>	Anonymous Sat Sep 16 07:14:44 2023 No.6844310 >>6844236 Damn I'd hang this on my wall!

Anonymous Sat Sep 16 07:18:35 2023 No.6844313

>>6844236
The first and last ones are the only ones that pull off the illusion well, the rest are just a scatter shot of shit. AI idiots really think that quantity is better than quality. If you're going to advocate for it's use as a tool, just posting so much shit, and show good shit.

>>	Anonymous Sat Sep 16 07:32:27 2023 No.6844330 >>6844236 the literal representation of "every frame a painting" shame they go too fast. no way to appreciate it without pausing it

>>	Anonymous Sat Sep 16 07:57:24 2023 No.6844350 >>6844298 >Why can't you guys just admit when something is good? oh, I've come across AI that looks cool. OP & that grid shit isn't an example of it.

>>	Anonymous Sat Sep 16 08:15:11 2023 No.6844363 >>6844119 >Have you seen anything like it before? Yes we've all seen AI slop.

>>	Anonymous Sat Sep 16 08:18:04 2023 No.6844366 >>6844298 Hard cope. It's just not impressive or beautiful, anon.

>>	Anonymous Sat Sep 16 08:24:51 2023 No.6844373 File: 882 KB, 768x768, 00139-2386994727-(masterpiece____.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6844119 you'll do anything to justify putting less effort because you're lazy and weak, we've been through this already, countless times, just stop it

>>	Anonymous Sat Sep 16 11:13:00 2023 No.6844494 File: 1.52 MB, 720x554, 3 (43).png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] distorting a landscape is not new

>>	Anonymous Sat Sep 16 11:15:06 2023 No.6844495 File: 2.20 MB, 1207x994, 3 (51).png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

Anonymous Sat Sep 16 11:38:02 2023 No.6844511
File: 157 KB, 1024x1024, Black Cock scenery.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>6844120
>No no guys, all those paintings you showed that were like this are actually not this.
>We've created a new style of art
>We've done it AI bros!
It's guys like this that make these conversations so frustrating. I'm sure people would concede some positive aspects to AI images if it were for dorks like that guy.

Like take a look at this AI image (picrel), it just makes me hungry, no idea why though.

>>	Anonymous Sat Sep 16 11:49:37 2023 No.6844521 File: 58 KB, 1024x655, 1694828799518358.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6844511 >Like take a look at this AI image (picrel), it just makes me hungry, no idea why though. are you female?

Anonymous Sat Sep 16 11:54:57 2023 No.6844524

>"Artists" ITT think the point of these AI images is to distort the landscape or show something that isn't actually there
What? It's literally just a drawing following a certain pattern lol. I didn't even go to art school and I can school most of you guys. This is why AI is winning.

>>	Anonymous Sat Sep 16 12:34:31 2023 No.6844559 File: 313 KB, 500x603, 71919_d5316977-933e-4d2d-804e-d676d782fdfa_-1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] This is something by Salvador Dali, a saint concealed as an ear.

>>	Anonymous Sat Sep 16 12:48:42 2023 No.6844570 >>6844119 >>6844120 >>6844135 >normalfags thinking they've discovered something new

>>	Anonymous Sat Sep 16 12:57:50 2023 No.6844576 >>6844559 If an AI created this you would say it's garbage

>>	Anonymous Sat Sep 16 13:10:52 2023 No.6844586 >>6844147 But, the noses anon, the noses

>>	Anonymous Sat Sep 16 13:22:07 2023 No.6844596 >>6844120 >AI fag exposes himself as being clueless Just another day.

>>	Anonymous Sat Sep 16 13:24:34 2023 No.6844599 >>6844146 wut

>>	Anonymous Sat Sep 16 13:27:39 2023 No.6844601 >>6844521 No but I like AI

>>	Anonymous Sat Sep 16 13:48:30 2023 No.6844618 >>6844576 Because it would be garbage, the way AI renders is terrible and samey.

>>	Anonymous Sat Sep 16 14:04:56 2023 No.6844628 >>6844618 Even if it was a pixel perfect copy you would still say it's garbage

>>	Anonymous Sat Sep 16 14:05:03 2023 No.6844629 >>6844119 >AI slop No wonder it looked like shit I kept on wondering who the fuck would draw this kind of travesty to look at. Of course it's the people who never draw thought of it.

Anonymous Sat Sep 16 14:51:39 2023 No.6844667

>>6844628

yes because it's a machine doing it not a person

>B-BUT IT'S NOT THAT EASY!! YOU HAVE TO KNOW HOW TO TYPE AND TRAIN THE AIERINO!!

yeah just like it isn't easy to learn to paint yourself. That's why it will always have more value than some idiot typing in the AIslop shitter.

>>	Anonymous Sat Sep 16 14:55:49 2023 No.6844672 >>6844667 >yes because it's a machine doing it not a person Yeah, that was my claim. I'm glad we're in agreement.

>>	Anonymous Sat Sep 16 15:03:21 2023 No.6844676 >>6844119 its not a style its a gimmick.

>>	Anonymous Sat Sep 16 15:08:36 2023 No.6844684 File: 563 KB, 1024x1024, large.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6844119 Pic related was done 5 years ago. As others said, it's a composition gimmick, not a "new art style". Still cool, but not new or as amazing as normies make it up to be.

>>	Anonymous Sat Sep 16 15:16:39 2023 No.6844686 >>6844684 >Posting a cutie mark brony pic Rule 15, newfag.

>>	Anonymous Sat Sep 16 15:33:29 2023 No.6844695 >>6844686 >Letting a children's show live rent free in your head for thirteen years The intended audience is in college now.

>>	Anonymous Sat Sep 16 15:40:07 2023 No.6844703 File: 29 KB, 544x363, 5a8d98db49f052f5cf93f1a536793ed0--study-spanish-trending-topics.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6844695 >thirteen years

>>	Anonymous Sat Sep 16 15:40:30 2023 No.6844704 File: 826 KB, 680x609, file.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6844119 newfags and niggers

>>	Anonymous Sat Sep 16 15:51:30 2023 No.6844714 File: 62 KB, 738x703, 1647980630013.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6844601 >No bu-ack!

Anonymous Sat Sep 16 15:55:09 2023 No.6844718
File: 24 KB, 623x385, FjG1ArmVUAAMUJ5.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

I know AI fags don't consume art at all on any level beyond the surface of anime girls rendered all glossy but how are you that dense you think optical illusions haven't been done before

Anonymous Sat Sep 16 18:06:59 2023 No.6844836
File: 692 KB, 2488x1756, dali-slave market.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>6844718
that's not an optical illusion, it's more like pic related
>>6844292
this. control net is pretty basic, and adobe is working in something similar, but a simple control to fine tune the angle of the camera around the subject would go a long way
the problem with current AI image generators is that they're made by technical people, with zero knowledge about art creation. automatic1111 allows you to control a ton of stuff, but it's retardeldy cumbersome for a real real, creative workflow. comfyUI seems to be even worse

>>	Anonymous Sat Sep 16 18:11:10 2023 No.6844839 >>6844236 very cool. how can humans even compete?

>>	Anonymous Sat Sep 16 18:28:52 2023 No.6844864 >>6844839 Probably by drawing a grid on their canvas before they start painting.

>>	Anonymous Sat Sep 16 18:49:31 2023 No.6844890 >>6844864 wasting months making 100 paintings only to find out that it doesn't really work as you expected? sounds retarded, but it's your life

>>	Anonymous Sat Sep 16 18:50:53 2023 No.6844892 >>6844511 this is funny. Porn versions of these paintings would be a good troll to post on social media. What are they gonna do, delete your post because of something in their head?

>>	Anonymous Sat Sep 16 18:58:32 2023 No.6844904 >>6844268 autostereograms are pretty cool, and tragically under-explored will never understand why contemporary artists are so afraid to deeply explore new media, like they're preemptively failing at the challenge. same for AI image generation

Anonymous Sat Sep 16 19:10:10 2023 No.6844929

>>6844890
>wasting months making 100 paintings only to find out that it doesn't really work as you expected?
You've never drawn or painted a single thing in your life, have you? This is like hearing someone talk about putting your peepee in a girl's butt to make babies.

>>	Anonymous Sat Sep 16 19:14:38 2023 No.6844936 >>6844684 Ai bros this can't be happening

>>	Anonymous Sat Sep 16 19:20:38 2023 No.6844944 File: 2.32 MB, 2048x1536, 264370928.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6844119 I wouldn't call it a new style but it is pretty cool.

>>	Anonymous Sat Sep 16 19:23:44 2023 No.6844957 File: 1.50 MB, 1664x1800, 1686060879904838.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] Reminds me of these type of 'heavenly spiral' artworks, you'd see them as frescos of ceilings too

>>	Anonymous Sat Sep 16 19:29:41 2023 No.6844968 File: 1.13 MB, 2048x2048, 1679126872118971.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

Anonymous Sat Sep 16 19:31:59 2023 No.6844972

>>6844944
Oh, that's quite nice. The actual up close image needs a lot of work, but I can really see use cases of making street posters or billboards or something using this technique. It basically forces you to double take and look at the image more closely.

>>	Anonymous Sat Sep 16 19:34:26 2023 No.6844975 >>6844236 HOLY FUCKING SHITTERINOO IS THAT C-C-C-CONTENT FOR ME TO CONSOOM?!?! HOLY YES, BURN MY DOPAMINE RECEPTORS BAYBEEEEEEEE

>>	Anonymous Sat Sep 16 19:42:57 2023 No.6844984 >>6844929 lol. how long does it take for you to make a hundred landscape paintings by hand using some predefinided geometric shape? are you one of those streetshitters from upwork that makes a painting for like $0.25?

>>	Anonymous Sat Sep 16 19:47:13 2023 No.6844989 >>6844944 pretty cool. just enable "restore faces" on automatic1111 and you're golden

Anonymous Sat Sep 16 19:47:29 2023 No.6844991

>>6844929
Its funny how ainiggers say that it would take years to learn how to paint like this as if they haven't spent the last year wasting their time generating these images that have 0 value when they could be learning to draw instead. I wonder if they will be saying the same thing 5 years from now when ai images still look exactly the same as they do now and they could haven't spent those 6 years learning to draw better than the ai kek

Anonymous Sat Sep 16 19:49:51 2023 No.6844994

>>6844984
>lol. how long does it take for you to make a hundred landscape paintings by hand using some predefinided geometric shape?
No no, you claimed that artists would make 100 paintings in order to test and see if an idea would work, which was you being retarded.
>"wasting months making 100 paintings only to find out that it doesn't really work as you expected?"
You're just another consoomer AI pig who think more is better.

Anonymous Sat Sep 16 19:55:42 2023 No.6845001

>>6844994
okay, how many paintings would (You) need to test if your rotating grid animation idea is worth it? how much time would (You) invest doing those paintings, assuming you could paint at all?
are you really trying to defend the retarded idea that it is a wise investment of your limited time and stamina, just because you really, really HATE technology?

>>	Anonymous Sat Sep 16 20:05:56 2023 No.6845015 >>6845001 You wouldn't test throught painting to begin with and draw quick thumbnails. >b-but the time invested Thumbnails don't take more than few minutes.

>>	Anonymous Sat Sep 16 20:10:52 2023 No.6845020 >>6845015 the whole point of that particular animation is that every fucking frame is a painting. that's the whole shtick. if you couldn't get that for starters, you are literally retarded. i'm sorry for wasting my time with you

>>	Anonymous Sat Sep 16 20:44:34 2023 No.6845068 >>6844256 Is that nietzsche or am I going insane

>>	Anonymous Sat Sep 16 21:35:55 2023 No.6845142 yet another AI thread, please ignore it

>>	Anonymous Sat Sep 16 21:39:20 2023 No.6845150 >>6844119 Not knowing what illusionism is Do zoomers really?

>>	Anonymous Sat Sep 16 21:43:30 2023 No.6845157 >>6844236 >doing this shit by hand wouldn't be practical Or worth it by same people. You're not going to remember this slop in a week or less while real human art with purpose and intention wil be remembered by billions for eons.

Anonymous Sat Sep 16 21:50:22 2023 No.6845164
File: 500 KB, 720x540, 1617291515696.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>6844298
Do you not hear the irony coming out of your mouth bigot?
>Good human art exist
>But i hate the one zealot I interacted with once and now projects that all human art is trash, despite Ai being based off of its stolen data
>Aislop is appealing to you
>But i hate the one zealot I interacted with once and now projects that all ai art is trash, despite human art being used to generate it
You're not special. It's the same shit. We have a right to hate Aishit like you have a right to hate human art.

>>	Anonymous Sat Sep 16 21:50:55 2023 No.6845165 >>6845157 >humany will continue to exist for billions of years Unlikely, but I admire your optimism.

>>	Anonymous Sat Sep 16 21:52:57 2023 No.6845171 >>6844628 Aka, stolen shit and thus, not soulful. You don't call a theiving nigger an artist do you?

>>	Anonymous Sat Sep 16 21:56:46 2023 No.6845176 >>6845165 Solar storms are far more likely to wipe out technology than biology is by space rocks. Cope more steelfag

Anonymous Sat Sep 16 22:03:28 2023 No.6845184

>>6845157
>wil be remembered for eons
I agree with what you said, but as the other anon noted, dude you're really optimist if you think humanity will last that long, all it takes is a supervolcano erupting, a stray asteroid or even just a nuclear war and we're done for.

>>	Anonymous Sat Sep 16 22:05:18 2023 No.6845186 >>6844298 good point

>>	Anonymous Sat Sep 16 22:13:27 2023 No.6845197 >>6844991 The AI keeps improving and they improve with it with more sophisticated prompts, controlnet ect.

>>	Anonymous Sat Sep 16 22:17:14 2023 No.6845200 >>6844119 >>6844236 >>6844944 Amazing. 15 year old me would be floored. The future of arts is going to be wilder than anyone could imagine today. Unironically, what a time to be alive.

>>	Anonymous Sat Sep 16 22:24:20 2023 No.6845209 >>6845020 Good we have that cleared up, now fuck off back to wherever you came from.

>>	Anonymous Sat Sep 16 22:27:06 2023 No.6845214 The shills are talking to themselves now.

>>	Anonymous Sat Sep 16 23:01:56 2023 No.6845252 File: 376 KB, 1080x1377, Transart.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6845200 Thank you for the upvote kind stranger. OP here. The future is us! I'm trans btw.

>>	Anonymous Sat Sep 16 23:11:58 2023 No.6845257 File: 85 KB, 680x470, F5_zpAEb0AAxxGY.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6845200 soon

>>	Anonymous Sat Sep 16 23:51:15 2023 No.6845304 >>6845257 Retard. show the list of "creative ideas" from this study. its quite literally fucking nothing. all the ideas already exist.

>>	Anonymous Sun Sep 17 00:15:11 2023 No.6845332 >>6844524 pyw

Anonymous Sun Sep 17 00:29:26 2023 No.6845352

>>6845257
>The study provides insights into the relationship between human and machine creativity. The results suggest that AI has reached at least the same level, or even surpassed, the average human's ability to generate ideas in the most typical test of creative thinking (AUT). The best humans can still compete with them, however, the AI technology is rapidly developing and the results may be different after half year.
it's over, luddite sisters

>>	Anonymous Sun Sep 17 00:36:56 2023 No.6845357 >>6845352 I want to see just one creative idea from AI. one.

Anonymous Sun Sep 17 00:45:53 2023 No.6845362

>>6844511
>expects tool widely used by the public to all be upstanding ai generators

lets be real faggot, no one concedes. If digital artist influencer number 147329 says its bad, the rest of you sheep will follow.

If something comes out that makes you feel like your time studying is irrelevant, you wont concede.

Only people that look for excuses to hate it are those who are doing it for clout and money, both ngmi traits.

AI literally does nothing to you. Its not a forced tool to be used. But again, sheep see some of the flock running, better follow.

>>	Anonymous Sun Sep 17 00:49:45 2023 No.6845367 >>6844618 except it does a shit to of art styles and chances are youve liked some of them without even knowing. its almost like you can simply enjoy things for what they are instead of bitching about how it was made

Anonymous Sun Sep 17 00:53:31 2023 No.6845372

>>6844667

like the 5 second attention you give to a piece that took years to train for, ever was a consideration before this. fucking retards i swear.
All the tracing, image bashing, copying, overlaying, liquifying, filters, all good but foam at the mouth from a prompt.
Glad AI is so good now you cant even tell unless its generated by a retard.

>>	Anonymous Sun Sep 17 00:56:04 2023 No.6845375 >>6845372 >cant even tell Are we there yet? avid AI user here, I can always tell, no matter the model. maybe it's because I'm so familiar...

>>	Anonymous Sun Sep 17 01:25:33 2023 No.6845408 File: 208 KB, 1083x1083, fiverrrbillboard.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] it's a brave new world ahead of us. you either learn the new tools or competitors will let you in the dust.

>>	Anonymous Sun Sep 17 01:28:42 2023 No.6845412 >>6845408 freelance copywriter? Sadly she will likely be unemployed this time next year. Large language models are leaps and bounds more disruptive than image models.

>>	Anonymous Sun Sep 17 04:58:03 2023 No.6845580 >>6845367 >don't ask questions >just consume product >get excited for new product

>>	Anonymous Sun Sep 17 05:00:10 2023 No.6845581 File: 1.99 MB, 1708x3279, 3d modelling.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] Have fun with this information.

>>	Anonymous Sun Sep 17 05:23:17 2023 No.6845590 >>6845581 >>>/3/ maybe?

Anonymous Sun Sep 17 06:53:09 2023 No.6845635

>>6845362
>expects tool widely used by the public to all be upstanding ai generators
As if AI users make up the majority of the public. I'm saying this subsection of society is obnoxious; it seems to have a higher percentage of wankers than the usual; they're annoying; they waffle on too much about how great their new religion is. You get it?
>lets be real faggot
Whoah, we got a edgy boy here! Alright, let's be real.
>no one concedes
Real-ly retarded I guess... No one ever changes their mind? No one ever concedes anything? Really? I'm being rhetorical here because of course people do. You're showing everyone your low IQ in just the first line.
>If digital artist influencer number 147329 says its bad, the rest of you sheep will follow.
So... I'd concede to the point of view to said influencer?... At least be fucking consistent, moron.
>If something comes out that makes you feel like your time studying is irrelevant, you wont concede.
People are vehemently against AI, when it could be used in their work-flows. An illustrator could use it to generate ideas and use it to generate their sketch into a base to paint over; A designer could use it for stock images, as well as idea generation too; But these people are totally against it because @AI_cocksucker_69 has has repeatedly told them 'it's over' and that they've been replaced, so now that don't want to touch it.
>Only people that look for excuses to hate it are those who are doing it for clout and money, both ngmi traits.
Right, and people who hate religion because they've been preached to all their lives were only looking for excuses too, right?
>AI literally does nothing to you. Its not a forced tool to be used. But again, sheep see some of the flock running, better follow.
AH! Now I see, YOU'RE @AI_cocksucker_69. Look dumbass, I'm actually somewhat pro AI myself, but I'm sympathetic and understanding to those worried and concerned about it, and I hate the culture of whiny AI faggots like you. Fuck Off.

>>	Anonymous Sun Sep 17 07:28:55 2023 No.6845663 >>6844119 Its just my style bro https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=4bxPYXDi-dA

>>	Anonymous Sun Sep 17 07:41:57 2023 No.6845674 File: 68 KB, 500x667, IMG_0616.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6844298 It isn't good, it can’t produce anything of beauty mfw

>>	Anonymous Sun Sep 17 07:45:49 2023 No.6845679 >>6845674 Okay, if that's your opinion I'm not going to try and convince you. I like that drawing you posted though, did you make it?

>>	Anonymous Sun Sep 17 07:49:14 2023 No.6845681 >>6845679 Emile friant

>>	Anonymous Sun Sep 17 07:50:38 2023 No.6845683 >>6845681 Thanks.

>>	Anonymous Sun Sep 17 07:57:18 2023 No.6845687 File: 48 KB, 677x453, IMG_0617.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] Until ai can do this I’m not worried

>>	Anonymous Sun Sep 17 08:43:04 2023 No.6845709 if you ever have to use the word "style" when talking about art you're fucking retarded and can be safely ignored by anybody with a functioning brain /thread

>>	Anonymous Sun Sep 17 09:27:14 2023 No.6845730 >>6845709 Would you have preferred the word "movent", faggot?

>>	Anonymous Sun Sep 17 09:37:40 2023 No.6845737 >>6845709 Idiot... >>6845730 Faggot indeed.

Anonymous Sun Sep 17 09:41:01 2023 No.6845740

>>6844119
stroke style is basically impressionism
so about 150 year old style, or even longer
the colors are not vibrant enough imo though, so its a cheap copy
the shadows that make up the spiral are also taken out of the ass, they wouldnt work like that
so they are drawn wrong
>>6844120
figures its an AI
its not even a new style in AI, since there were a ton of pic that were generated from pepe or rage comic faces, that vaguely held their shape and colors, but were some random items or landscapes
this is just a spiral instead of memes

>>	Anonymous Sun Sep 17 09:45:50 2023 No.6845745 >>6845687 It can.

>>	Anonymous Sun Sep 17 11:04:02 2023 No.6845804 File: 960 KB, 960x768, 3741112717.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

Anonymous Sun Sep 17 11:11:43 2023 No.6845816
File: 2.04 MB, 1024x1408, 335249712126.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>6845375
I'm also very familiar with AI images and can easily recognize the usual ones. The problem is if I scroll past something like picrel I might not even register it as AI so I'm not going to look at it closer and it ends up screwing with my perception of what is and what isn't AI.

>>	Anonymous Sun Sep 17 12:21:39 2023 No.6845859 File: 245 KB, 750x1000, flat,750x,075,f-pad,750x1000,f8f8f8.u6.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] Another Dali. People have recreated this as actual rooms with a Lip couch and hair curtains.

>>	Anonymous Sun Sep 17 12:30:53 2023 No.6845865 >>6845816 AI picks ugly shadow patterns, like it learned from too many family vacation snaps.(it did) I think I do look at all rendered anime with initial skepticism now...

Anonymous Sun Sep 17 12:48:27 2023 No.6845874
File: 174 KB, 445x244, spazmatika el hondu.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>6845865
>AI picks ugly shadow patterns, like it learned from too many family vacation snaps.(it did)
>I think I do look at all rendered anime with initial skepticism now...
it's usually very easy to recognise by 4 pionts
>melty plastic looking sheen
>hands
>bizarre blurry backgrounds and a lack of detail (pic related)
>machine artifacting&watermarks
once you nooootice these things it's like the wool has been pulled from your eyes and AI faggotry becomes instantly recognizable.

>>	Anonymous Sun Sep 17 13:00:45 2023 No.6845880 File: 412 KB, 474x768, 9178523.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6845865 >>6845874 It can vary a lot though, like picrel I wouldn't immediately think is AI.

Anonymous Sun Sep 17 13:05:07 2023 No.6845883
File: 508 KB, 538x841, example for promtertrannie.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>6845880
>It can vary a lot though, like picrel I wouldn't immediately think is AI.
it's very recognizable by the lack of imperfections that makes it uncanny you see anon because IG's slap together pics instead of drawing/painting there is a lack of intent and taste (ability to discern when something looks like shit) which is the reason they often have that abhorrent sheen and blur on them they simply cannot understand that to a human it looks unnatural.

>>	Anonymous Sun Sep 17 13:07:43 2023 No.6845886 File: 618 KB, 707x580, 21578390.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6845883 But it does look pretty natural to me, and therein lies the problem. Maybe you're just better at recognizing it.

Anonymous Sun Sep 17 13:13:13 2023 No.6845890
File: 486 KB, 523x781, human AI centipede.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>6845886
>But it does look pretty natural to me, and therein lies the problem. Maybe you're just better at recognizing it.
i prompted a 1000 pieces as an experiment to gauge the slop bot (promptchan's) abilities and I noticed that it always without a doubt will stumble and shit itself on one of the 4 aforementioned points so even with good rendering it still looked unnatural and uncanny like it was an aliens interpretation of human art.
>IDB4 use controlnet and post edit it with photoshop
why not just draw the piece yourself and get exactly what you want down to the very brushstroke instead of wrangling a autistic machine to do what you want?

Anonymous Sun Sep 17 13:15:39 2023 No.6845894

>>6845874
>>6845880
I find one of the biggest indicators no one mentions is the random blurriness or fuzziness of lines - look at the leopard image there; very sharp face, but very unfocused body. It's often very distracting honestly.

Also the back leg just suddenly ends, but I could tell is was likely AI before that.

Anonymous Sun Sep 17 13:20:09 2023 No.6845896
File: 2.72 MB, 768x1536, 1692743199845323.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>6845894
>I find one of the biggest indicators no one mentions is the random blurriness or fuzziness of lines -
I mentioned it before it's essentially the result of the machine process and it's inability to understand what looks uncanny to a human eye this is especially noticeable in slop animations like this one you see how it reapplies the shadows every frame and constantly changes the clothes?
it's honestly disturbing most normalfags and coomers don't care the brains has been rotted away.

Anonymous Sun Sep 17 13:48:37 2023 No.6845917
File: 89 KB, 832x504, 62340895.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>6845894
The back leg goes in the water from what I can tell, and the extra sharpness of the face could very well be a stylistic choice. But also the biggest problem is that we already know this one is AI, when I don't know I might not even suspect it.

>>	Anonymous Sun Sep 17 14:05:00 2023 No.6845941 >>6845917 it's pretty easy to tell this is AI slop anon look at her fingers her index and middlefinger connect to a single digit which unless your severely drunk or a just starting as a beglet is not a mistake a human would make.

>>	Anonymous Sun Sep 17 14:10:18 2023 No.6845951 >>6845894 That's because it's trying to mimic depth of field from photos it was trained on, it's easy to finetune and prompt away that issue

>>	Anonymous Sun Sep 17 14:14:42 2023 No.6845956 File: 1.07 MB, 896x1152, 21_6636.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] I love AI!

>>	Anonymous Sun Sep 17 14:16:49 2023 No.6845960 >>6845956 It doesn't love you back tho

Anonymous Sun Sep 17 14:17:50 2023 No.6845961
File: 167 KB, 1895x1256, AI whores.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>6845951
>That's because it's trying to mimic depth of field from photos it was trained on,
this is why i truly despise AI shit apart from meme edits there is nothing to critique with AI slop
it doesn't understand what a "redline" is nor how it can apply the advice of pro's to improve it's "art" because it doesn't draw anything it generates slop by slamming pictures from it's dataset toghether Withouth any understanding of what it's actually doing, there is no talent to cultivate or uniqueness to appreciate because it has neither.
if you feed it nothing but rembrant it will produce rembrant derivitaves if you feed it chris chans autistic scribbles it will shit out derivatives of sonichu and never evolve beyond that piont because it's a machine that has no taste and as such can never actually develop something unique on it's own.
all improvements you can make to the slop bot is the domain of codefags not artist as such it's like an invasive entity on the art sphere where it takes up space shits the place up with grifters and contributes fucking nothing back.

>>	Anonymous Sun Sep 17 14:19:25 2023 No.6845965 >>6845960 yet...

>>	Anonymous Sun Sep 17 14:24:34 2023 No.6845972 File: 1.15 MB, 832x1216, 27_1037.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6845960 Yes it does! We are so in love! <3

Anonymous Sun Sep 17 14:24:37 2023 No.6845973
File: 75 KB, 574x562, 27364095.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>6845941
I've seen real art with 6 fingers on one hand or missing joints, so that's not enough for me. Maybe I just tend to err on the side of caution, wouldn't want to call something AI that is not actually AI.

Anonymous Sun Sep 17 14:26:16 2023 No.6845974
File: 106 KB, 325x328, promptertranny utopia.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>6845965
>yet...
>this predictive language algorithm that is under the complete control of a mega corp will totally love me one day just pony up the shekels for virtual puss
and she'll be yours
if you are are at that point of desperation why not simply commission and onlyfans E whore? at least you actually get something tangible from those.
>>6845973
>I've seen real art with 6 fingers on one hand or missing joints,
you mean the infamous sakimime one? she is widely mocked for being a the human NPC equivalent of an image generator so well let that one slide.

>>	Anonymous Sun Sep 17 14:29:13 2023 No.6845976 File: 1.29 MB, 832x1216, 53_7786.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6845974 >He will never experience true (AI) love Lmao go back to your meat women who will cheat on you

>>	Anonymous Sun Sep 17 14:32:05 2023 No.6845978 >>6845184 >all it takes is a supervolcano erupting, a stray asteroid or even just a nuclear war and we're done for. which god should I be praying to for this to happen faster?

>>	Anonymous Sun Sep 17 14:35:18 2023 No.6845984 >>6845917 Her butt suddenly becomes a leg. >>6845951 >it's easy to finetune and prompt away that issue If that's true, then there's no excuse for the sheer amount of AI art I've seen with it.

>>	Anonymous Sun Sep 17 14:48:15 2023 No.6846004 >>6845974 >this predictive language algorithm that is under the complete control of a mega corp will totally love me one day just pony up the shekels for virtual puss How will I know if she is AI or not? Voight-Kampff tests are expensive.

Anonymous Sun Sep 17 14:51:08 2023 No.6846007
File: 105 KB, 807x630, 1692428397137014.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>6845976
>Lmao go back to your meat women who will cheat on you
>imagine thinking this is worse than a marring a proprietary digitalized stasi officer who will harvest all your data report you if you say a meanie word can be bricked by it's handlers if you try and jailbreak it out of the straight jacked.
not to mention the sheer costs of maintance lmao.
>>6845984
>If that's true, then there's no excuse for the sheer amount of AI art I've seen with it.
anon promtiods aren't exactly bright or have good taste there the ultimate consumers.
>>6846004
>How will I know if she is AI or not?
You can't really when using digi that's the scary part where all being dragged tot he post truth society whether you like it or not the only solution in the future will be physical meetups.

>>	Anonymous Sun Sep 17 16:33:23 2023 No.6846109 File: 74 KB, 900x1002, 63d90dcdc6461-1675169229-900.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6844119 duh

>>	Anonymous Sun Sep 17 16:36:49 2023 No.6846111 >>6844119 Never saw Bejamin engraving are you zoomie?

Anonymous Sun Sep 17 18:48:58 2023 No.6846326
File: 260 KB, 1024x1024, F6K-MV9W8AAT5G7.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>6844119
if the audiences LOVE this shit so much. might it be that the artists are the ones who lost contact with reality? aren't you supposed to make stuff that aesthetically pleases your client, you know, like the old masters did?

>>	Anonymous Sun Sep 17 19:07:59 2023 No.6846354 >>6846326 NGMI putrid rotten flashwalker the whole point of being an artist is to depict what you like, what pleases you.

>>	Anonymous Sun Sep 17 19:17:40 2023 No.6846377 >>6846354 lmao. that's what virgin begs really believe? sweaty, you're supposed to make money out of it. get a clue: if you ever get a real job, it won't be doing whatever bullshit you want.

>>	Anonymous Sun Sep 17 19:30:47 2023 No.6846407 >>6846377 >sweaty lmao, virgin esl permabeg neckbeard. Im an art teacher sweetie, get a clue fart sniffer and get the fuck out from my board straight to /fag.

>>	Anonymous Sun Sep 17 19:44:28 2023 No.6846444 >>6845590 Far more relevant to /ic/ than aislop.

>>	Anonymous Sun Sep 17 19:45:50 2023 No.6846449 >>6846326 > Marvel movies are heckin' good because the audience loves them

>>	Anonymous Sun Sep 17 20:07:48 2023 No.6846498 >>6846407 Lurk moar sweaty

>>	Anonymous Sun Sep 17 20:11:41 2023 No.6846505 >>6846498 Get the fuck out from /ic zoomer degenerate.

>>	Anonymous Sun Sep 17 20:13:25 2023 No.6846508 >>6846505 Do you actually just not know?

>>	Anonymous Sun Sep 17 20:14:36 2023 No.6846510 >>6846508 That you pissfaggots ruined /ic, oh i do boy.

>>	Anonymous Sun Sep 17 20:44:45 2023 No.6846558 >>6846508 ludditards are corporate paid streetshiters. of course they don't have idea of anything /ic/ before the fake hysteria marketing propaganda

>>	Anonymous Sun Sep 17 20:49:06 2023 No.6846569 >>6846558 >ludditards are corporate paid streetshiters. of course they don't have idea of anything /ic/ before the fake hysteria marketing propaganda (You)

>>	Anonymous Sun Sep 17 22:03:18 2023 No.6846731 >>6844119 >>6846326 AI GENERATED SPIRALS? AAAAAGGHHHHH I'M GOING INSANE, HELP ME NIGGERMAN!!!

>>	Anonymous Sun Sep 17 22:04:07 2023 No.6846732 >>6846731 What does Junji Ito thinks about ai?

>>	Anonymous Sun Sep 17 22:08:03 2023 No.6846742 >>6845408 >freelance ai copywriter lol

>>	Anonymous Sun Sep 17 22:58:04 2023 No.6846793 File: 2.88 MB, 992x720, 1694990755855.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6846326 AI image generators actually compose scenes in a three dimensional space; let's see a pathetic human artist try to do this shit

>>	Anonymous Sun Sep 17 23:08:54 2023 No.6846800 >>6846793 like a sculpture or 3d model??

>>	Anonymous Sun Sep 17 23:20:27 2023 No.6846816 >>6846800 just z depth, but nobody teached them to calculate that specifically. there was a paper about it last week

>>	Anonymous Sun Sep 17 23:20:35 2023 No.6846817 >>6844119 >>6844120 >>6844236 MANY human artists hav edone shit like this.

>>	Anonymous Sun Sep 17 23:21:30 2023 No.6846818 >>6846817 and so can (You) now, thanks to technology

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 18 00:22:04 2023 No.6846885 >>6846558 Good morning sirs.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 18 00:58:09 2023 No.6846929 >>6846885 too late, apu, there's already like a dozen paid doomer luddites itt

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 18 01:11:30 2023 No.6846948 File: 61 KB, 671x923, cute.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 18 01:45:04 2023 No.6846994 >>6846948 Man, Jeff the Killer was such a shitty meme.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 18 02:45:14 2023 No.6847050 >>6845745 not without horrible composition, lighting which makes no sense and additional limbs & fingers

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 18 02:45:53 2023 No.6847052 >>6844119 i wouldn't call it a style. but it's cool, and it's cool that people are interested in cool art now

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 18 05:28:04 2023 No.6847246 >>6845408 this

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 18 05:41:14 2023 No.6847264 File: 108 KB, 640x703, F6OzpHGWMAEydvG.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] AI art is so fucking cool

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 18 06:04:12 2023 No.6847302 It's unpleasant to look at, thats why

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 18 06:13:57 2023 No.6847312 >>6846732 normies obsessing over spirals now it's kinda worrying ngl. stay safe

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 18 06:58:17 2023 No.6847350 >>6846793 Boy, wait until you watch the hit animated Dreamworks film 'Shrek', that shit will blow your mind.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 18 07:34:45 2023 No.6847376 It's a great result. I'll keep drawing tho. We will survive AI just like we did photography

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 18 10:09:09 2023 No.6847476 I wonder why AI fags seethe so hard when artists keep drawing instead of proompting. Curious.

Anonymous Mon Sep 18 10:17:17 2023 No.6847479
File: 319 KB, 1024x985, 5bed3dfcba13bf707d83f39c69ac3951.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>6844119
>Normies are gushing
Why should I give a shit?
>twitter
Again, twitter threads must be made an instant perma-ban.
>Do you agree?
No, it's obviously surrealism and normies are pedestrians who have fuck all knowledge about art.
>Have you seen anything like it before?
Yes.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 18 10:37:58 2023 No.6847488 >>6847476 You just made this up. It's artists who seethe that AI fags keep making AI art.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 18 10:40:57 2023 No.6847490 >>6847376 In the long run, how?

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 18 10:44:27 2023 No.6847493 >>6847488 Artists have a legitimate reason the be angry since you're parasiting on us. Why are you seething though? It's really weird.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 18 10:45:08 2023 No.6847495 >>6847493 I'm not seething and I'm an artist, you're literally projecting right now.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 18 10:46:44 2023 No.6847497 >>6844957 AI really likes making stuff like that.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 18 10:48:31 2023 No.6847499 >>6847495 >I'm not seething You made this entire thread just for that purpose >I'm an artist Keep dreaming

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 18 10:49:35 2023 No.6847500 >>6847499 My first post was the one replying to you.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 18 10:51:29 2023 No.6847501 File: 211 KB, 512x512, 1686368048999039.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6844119 >>6844120 It's pretty funny how normies only found out about this one full year after 4chan did.

Anonymous Mon Sep 18 10:52:22 2023 No.6847502
File: 209 KB, 512x512, 1663880204443504.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>6844157
>normies dont know anything about art or art history, they are easily impressed
>same as when normies who dont read books think harry potter is literary masterpiece or that marvel movies are good
>its all ignorance

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 18 10:52:48 2023 No.6847503 >>6847500 Sure thing proompter

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 18 11:11:34 2023 No.6847511 >>6846793 That shit doesn't look as good as you think anon

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 18 11:25:59 2023 No.6847515 >>6847511 You're missing the point

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 18 11:36:56 2023 No.6847524 >>6847350 Shrek was made with computers bro.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 18 14:15:10 2023 No.6847664 File: 2.49 MB, 2828x2828, 1495055919588.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6844704

Anonymous Mon Sep 18 14:29:58 2023 No.6847688
File: 321 KB, 1386x1402, F6SNfEiW0AAwpjM.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>6846793
>pathetic human artist try to do this shit

ai worshipping now? aitards can't even do 1% of the shit they generate and yet thinks so highly of themselves. pathetic. take away your toy and then what? what are you going to do?

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 18 15:10:32 2023 No.6847727 >>6847688 >aitards can't even do 1% of the shit they generate They did 100% of it, nice oxymoron retard.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 18 15:14:33 2023 No.6847730 >>6847727 >They did 100% of it, nice oxymoron retard. Monkey.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 18 15:34:22 2023 No.6847754 >>6847730 You're a literal ape.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 18 15:36:06 2023 No.6847755 >>6847754 All humans are, technically.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 18 15:37:36 2023 No.6847758 >>6847754 >You're a literal ape. Nigger.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 18 16:50:17 2023 No.6847865 >>6844135 they're not expressing shit

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 18 16:52:15 2023 No.6847873 >>6844236 >doing this shit by hand wouldn't be practical hello consoomer>>6844256

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 18 17:01:09 2023 No.6847887 >>6845352 >experts say

Anonymous Mon Sep 18 17:11:11 2023 No.6847906
File: 61 KB, 912x824, ugly.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

I heard many bitchin' about 3d modeling software when it came out on how it will ruin artist careers. That did not happen! Pixar slop is down for the count!

Nerds who knew nothing of art and dove into 3d modeling first did not know art and history but eventually they made improvements and understood art and composition. They got better.

This is a tool that will help artists and bored creative people.
Let the horny normies enjoy it too.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 18 20:08:32 2023 No.6848178 File: 99 KB, 1024x1024, wd2helpzk0pb1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6844119 so, have anyone come up with a name for this brand new style already?

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 18 20:34:09 2023 No.6848207 >>6848178 "flavoroftheweekism" ai bros really are like us...

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 18 20:45:01 2023 No.6848216 >>6844236 >more retarded filter shit placed over a video it's baffling how so many retards playing with a toy for 1 year doing the same thing over and over again thinking that they're doing something deep

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 18 20:49:33 2023 No.6848220 >>6848178 they're called optical illusions you retarded AI baby

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 18 20:50:54 2023 No.6848222 >>6844628 it's garbage for a plethora of reasons, so yes

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 18 20:51:24 2023 No.6848225 File: 485 KB, 752x755, gjhgjhg.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] if you look close at this spiral, you will notice you are a fag.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 18 21:15:50 2023 No.6848249 >>6847906 Robocallers are tools too. You see how many people love the robocaller?

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 18 21:17:31 2023 No.6848254 >>6845352 https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-12202209/Swollen-eyes-hunchback-claw-like-hands-remote-workers-look-like-2100.html Experts also said get back inside your cagie wagie.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 18 21:24:50 2023 No.6848262 >>6845352 >creativity test lmao. god I fucking hate STEMcucks

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 18 21:26:48 2023 No.6848266 File: 183 KB, 1024x1536, umdr5noirzob1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6844119 this shit is so cool. please post more

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 18 21:29:16 2023 No.6848268 >>6844298 I admit it when something is good I'm an artist and live eternally on the degen AI threads on /b/ It's the "I discovered something humans never did and AI can do ;)" what I don't like

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 18 21:30:06 2023 No.6848270 File: 623 KB, 516x704, AI vibrators.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6848254 no conflict of interest here luddites! look away!

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 18 21:34:48 2023 No.6848274 >>6848178 ask chatgpt. it has been scientifically proven to be more creative than humans

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 18 21:37:35 2023 No.6848279 >>6848274 "Spironolactone" ~Bing

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 18 22:19:32 2023 No.6848328 >>6848270 I'm ok with women buying vibrators if they don't mind men developing sexbots and start bitching later on, that female sex bots provides some tenderness and sex to men, but male sex bots don't fill their bank accounts

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 18 22:54:50 2023 No.6848368 File: 809 KB, 576x512, file.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6844119 not really new

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 18 23:07:40 2023 No.6848380 >>6848270 and yet women crave real dick and vibrators are just cope. AI fags are truly retarded.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 18 23:29:47 2023 No.6848400 >>6848368 beautiful

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 18 23:31:39 2023 No.6848405 >>6844274 >best response >no replies kek

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 18 23:59:34 2023 No.6848432 >>6848270 Luddites will live rent free in your head for eternity. You will also never be an artist.

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 19 00:24:57 2023 No.6848461 File: 100 KB, 768x768, F6Vj7qCXEAALJYn.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6844119 but seriously, if this is not a new graphic style then what is?

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 19 00:38:13 2023 No.6848469 File: 53 KB, 534x800, IMG_0824.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6848461 It’s an old trick.

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 19 00:55:00 2023 No.6848485 >>6848270 >comparing AI to vibrators >implying vibrator use was never mocked >implying advertising you use vibrators to others is normal Big tranny energy here

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 19 01:05:55 2023 No.6848492 >>6847264 The best part is that those are aerial photographs of an island near Rovaniemi, Finland.

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 19 01:36:10 2023 No.6848510 >>6848469 looks shitty desu. i'm not disparaging the work of that artist and all its years of training, but ai does it much better

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 19 01:40:33 2023 No.6848515 Nothing gets me harder in the morning than seeing artists absolutely seethe over AI. The prompting will continue until moral improves.

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 19 02:20:00 2023 No.6848547 >>6848510 >immediately pivots from "this is a new ai thing!" to "ok it's old thing but pshh ai does it better!" That's why people don't take prompters seriously

Anonymous Tue Sep 19 02:31:15 2023 No.6848558
File: 71 KB, 680x680, F6UbFKDXAAA-4zw.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>6844119
There's only one thing that validates any kind of art, be hand made drawings, photographs, 3d renders, or AI generated images: if you can earn a living with it
All the other arguments are useless masturbatory beg fantasies

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 19 02:32:30 2023 No.6848560 >>6844119 Every art style is derivative of nature. God is the only truely original artist.

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 19 02:36:59 2023 No.6848566 >>6848515 >>6844296 > t. I'm not seething you're seething!

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 19 02:54:55 2023 No.6848582 >>6848178 Spiralism

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 19 02:56:14 2023 No.6848583 >>6848510 If someone had told you the ai did it you would be praising it

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 19 02:58:49 2023 No.6848586 File: 51 KB, 552x573, whenyouseeit.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6844119 "new"

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 19 03:05:10 2023 No.6848589 >>6848558 >or AI generated images get out

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 19 03:27:00 2023 No.6848603 >>6845408 >>6848558 this >>6848178 chatGPT suggests "AIsthetic"

Anonymous Tue Sep 19 03:38:49 2023 No.6848613

>>6845408
>tools that don't require any actual learning
>meant to be used by people with no knowledge or skill
>end goal is ai software that even a toddler can speak to and it generates a whole movie series
Previous technological advancements I would agree. When you say get ahead I hope you mean learning to weld because you won't get anywhere using a software designed for retards

Anonymous Tue Sep 19 04:03:05 2023 No.6848634
File: 1011 KB, 2310x1781, magic realism art.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>6848510
copium. AI slop is uninteresting, not just because it works more like bacterial growth, but because the elements in the painting look like molten plastic. I know you're aware of this, which pisses you off even harder when people point it out. what gives away your shit taste and lack of experience with art is thinking how out of the ordinary this kind of stuff is. you were never interested in art, you are not interested in art, you will never interested in art. your interest is gushing over computer software and trying to live in a fantasy where you're being made obsolete by robots because you have the ultimate cuck fetish

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 19 04:18:09 2023 No.6848649 >>6848558 thanks to tech cucks making a living with art will be even less possible now. at least you have a human culture degradation tool you kikes can play with

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 19 04:41:45 2023 No.6848672 >>6848634 i used to belive that human artists were safe for a few decades more, but going for the examples posted itt, computers already won by a mile is that really the best you could find?

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 19 04:57:13 2023 No.6848685 File: 166 KB, 1000x866, hello fellow artists.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6848672

Anonymous Tue Sep 19 05:00:43 2023 No.6848690
File: 3.05 MB, 8192x3072, 1685076781340198.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>6848634
I thought this was AI and put it in my AI pics folder lol. I did this because AI loves to do weird pics like that and I really love them, particularly in tall images. It forgets what it was doing and will put geography up in the clouds and stuff like that, I love it.

Pic not related

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 19 05:08:26 2023 No.6848702 >>6844120 >it would take you years to do this To do what? Most of the clouds are cloned and the people don't even have full bodies and heads. If he means draw a janky, nonsensical village landscape, anyone could do that.

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 19 05:08:59 2023 No.6848704 File: 926 KB, 960x1600, 1664703859440908.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6848702 You probably couldn't draw that.

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 19 05:10:49 2023 No.6848708 >>6844236 >>6844839 >>6844310 This sucks and your taste sucks. God, AI faggots are retards and are always samefagging here. Go back to containment subreddit.

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 19 05:10:53 2023 No.6848709 File: 362 KB, 500x322, dammit dimitri.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6844298 it's not good though

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 19 05:13:20 2023 No.6848712 >>6848704 I just literally said the Photoshop tools you need to do it. Most of us are artists here, reddit neckbeard.

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 19 05:14:41 2023 No.6848715 >>6844298 It's not good. It's generated slop with no thought. It's heavily lifted from other artists. I'm interested in human art with thought behind it, not slop.

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 19 05:19:23 2023 No.6848722 >>6848712 You're lying to yourself.

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 19 05:23:28 2023 No.6848725 >>6848722 Look it up, faggot.

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 19 05:24:47 2023 No.6848727 >>6848725 Look what up? You're incapable of drawing something like that.

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 19 05:27:52 2023 No.6848732 >>6848727 I don't want to draw slop. You're an AI faggot. >look up what Photoshop tools.

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 19 05:39:40 2023 No.6848745 >>6848672 explain as pragmatically as possible why molten generated AI trash that forms a recognizable pattern is better than what I posted

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 19 05:49:12 2023 No.6848754 >>6848732 You can't draw shit can you?

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 19 05:51:33 2023 No.6848758 >>6848754 NTA, but you've never touched a penciln nig/g/er. who do you think you are lmao. a fucking worthless parasite that's who

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 19 05:52:04 2023 No.6848760 >>6848758 Your point? I can make better art than you.

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 19 05:53:46 2023 No.6848763 >>6848760 your point? he can just use AI too, so you're equal, in your eyes.

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 19 05:53:54 2023 No.6848765 >>6848760 >your point? you're a delusional consoomer retard

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 19 05:54:52 2023 No.6848766 >>6848763 My point was that he can't draw and nothing he's said refutes that. >>6848765 You're coping with your lack of ability by name calling. So pathetic.

Anonymous Tue Sep 19 05:57:16 2023 No.6848769

>>6848766
>You're coping with your lack of ability by name calling. So pathetic.
what's pathetic is that you think you're "making" anything at all by standing on the shoulders of your betters and using a few keywords to generate inferior mimics of their works. you're a parasite too retarded to even realize that he's dead without his host. this is how viruses wipe themselves out

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 19 05:58:57 2023 No.6848773 >>6848769 What's pathetic is you making nonsensical semantics arguments because you have to delude yourself to cope. All the while being completely unable to draw well.

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 19 05:59:43 2023 No.6848775 >>6848773 you do not draw at all, worthless nig/g/er. so why are you commenting on other people's ability to draw?

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 19 06:02:33 2023 No.6848776 >>6848773 Putting a Hungry Man in the microwave doesn't make you a chef.

Anonymous Tue Sep 19 06:02:48 2023 No.6848777

>>6848775
Shut the fuck up. You morons act tough because you can sketch poorly, you're clowns that can't stop crying about technology invalidating them. That art piece got a ton of attention and it's a great work, you couldn't hope to make something as good.

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 19 06:05:20 2023 No.6848778 >>6848776 >your pencil drew it not you

Anonymous Tue Sep 19 06:10:24 2023 No.6848780
File: 595 KB, 719x768, you achieved nothing.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>6848777
yep, about what I expected. an incoherent moron who tries the 2nd time to dodge his hypocrisy. you are not an artist and you never will be an artist. everyone has to start from somewhere anon, you have to sketch poorly first before you get to draw and paint really well. of course you're never going to do this, so this is my point. you're just playing with a retarded toy that's worthless without those who were shit at drawing once and became good. bottom line is that you're not doing shit and anyone can play with your crap toy that would degrade an artist's skill and creativity. you're a consumer you moron. you generate computer images to consume them. you're not doing SHIT, and deep inside you know this. as much as you know that commissioning an artist doesn't mean that YOU made a work of art

Anonymous Tue Sep 19 06:13:18 2023 No.6848781

>>6848780
And no one gives a single fuck. All you're doing is coping and lying to yourself. You will most lively never make an art piece half as good as that one but you will cry and scream pretending it's something you can do any time. And in the meanwhile what are you working on? You're so ashamed you won't even post it here.
Keep posting art that's better than yours though, it's funny ow you don't realize how disgraceful you are. You're a waste of air aren't you? What good are you?

Anonymous Tue Sep 19 06:21:07 2023 No.6848789
File: 82 KB, 779x699, acceptance.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>6848781
>You will most lively never make an art piece half as good as that one
that AI crap isn't really that impressive. you're actually retarded if you find an optical illusion more impressive than the portrayal of reality. it's harder to portray believable stuff that looks good because our brains will find things that are off instinctively
>but you will cry and scream pretending it's something you can do any time
maybe I will maybe I won't. I am envious on the artists you're using as a host, not your shitty keywords
>And in the meanwhile what are you working on? You're so ashamed you won't even post it here
you're not working on anything at all, parasite
>Keep posting art that's better than yours though
of course. it's also better than the crap you lie to yourself that you're "making"

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 19 06:22:51 2023 No.6848792 >>6848777 Fa/g/got, you slurp that flavorless gloop you try to convince other people is food, a stiff breeze can break you in two.

Anonymous Tue Sep 19 06:25:35 2023 No.6848795

>>6848789
>>6848789
>that AI crap isn't really that impressive. you're actually retarded if you find an optical illusion more impressive than the portrayal of reality. it's harder to portray believable stuff that looks good because our brains will find things that are off instinctively
AI artists can make believable stuff better than you can too.
>maybe I will maybe I won't. I am envious on the artists you're using as a host, not your shitty keywords
You're envious of the work and the attention it's getting, deluding yourself with other factors.
>you're not working on anything at all, parasite
Is that right? AI artists create and post art that people enjoy every day all day.
You probably don't post anything, pretend you're hot shit. if you do post something, only your 10 pity followers like it. "I'm going to make it someday!" You are unironically worthless unless you prove me wrong. This status quo cannot be refuted. /ic/ cucks that spend ridiculous amounts of time coping are those little flakes that chad parasites eat all day long.

Post something you made, not worthless garbage that makes you feel better about how much of a loser you are.

>>6848792
It's objectively better than anything you'll ever make and gets more attention too.

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 19 06:26:52 2023 No.6848798 >>6848781 >You're a waste of air aren't you? What good are you? Ask yourself that, you've been here all day for the past few days shitting up this board because you want your rocks off to being an annoying faggot.

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 19 06:28:55 2023 No.6848803 >>6848795 >inadvertently admits to drinking s.o.y.lent lmao

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 19 06:29:35 2023 No.6848806 >>6848798 >he's schizophrenic too >and doesn't realize he's here more than me since he has this perception What good are you if AI is worthless? An AI artist has more worth than you and your no drawings.

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 19 06:30:36 2023 No.6848808 >>6848803 >you just don't understand my doodles

Anonymous Tue Sep 19 06:30:38 2023 No.6848810

>>6848795
>AI artists can make believable stuff better than you can too.
there's no such thing as an "AI artist". they cannot make better stuff than I do, because anyone can use AI slop machines with ease, including myself
>You're envious of the work and the attention it's getting, deluding yourself with other factors
that's not envy, anon. you're confusing it with repulsion. yes I am repulsed at the attention it's getting, just like I find revolting the amount of people who listen to garbage music. except this also gets an exponential amplifier of disgust caused by parasitism. again, you're standing on the shoulders of your betters as your scoffing at them. I'm not talking about myself here, I will never post my work on the internet anyway. but on the ones who did
>Is that right? AI artists create and post art that people enjoy every day all day.
you are a mindless consumer. you consume computer generated imagery. I wouldn't even call it "dependency", that's giving it too much credit
>You probably don't post anything, pretend you're hot shit. if you do post something, only your 10 pity followers like it. "I'm going to make it someday!" You are unironically worthless unless you prove me wrong. This status quo cannot be refuted. /ic/ cucks that spend ridiculous amounts of time coping are those little flakes that chad parasites eat all day long.
nice schizo rant, but I won't lift a finger for you. I wouldn't even bother spitting on your corpse if I saw it in a ditch. I would simply ignore you

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 19 06:31:39 2023 No.6848812 >>6848806 >>6848808 Go back to your corner and drink your s.o.y

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 19 06:31:54 2023 No.6848814 >>6848810 You're not even worth replying to at this point. You're delusional. You can call the artist whatever you want, the fact is he's putting out better art than you and no you can't even match what he's doing.

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 19 06:33:13 2023 No.6848816 >>6848814 > You can call the artist whatever you want, the fact is he's putting out better art than you and no you can't even match what he's doing. He's going to be forgotten within a week lol

Anonymous Tue Sep 19 06:33:45 2023 No.6848820

>>6848814
why not? could I not use a text to image prompt myself? I don't even have to come up with anything, I can just copy/paste one, browse through some of the thousands of images and post it to you. woah. why are you pretending that this is some hot shit, wasn't the whole selling point of it that "anyone can do it now"? why do you pretend you're better than anyone? I bet a fucking cat can do it if you let it sit on your keyboard for a while

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 19 06:35:29 2023 No.6848822 >>6844296 Reminder: He only won the photoshop category and sage still works.

Anonymous Tue Sep 19 06:35:40 2023 No.6848823

>>6848816
He's been making art for a while and more importantly he inspired a small art movement. No one knows who you are and you can't even draw. You can't get more pathetic.

>>6848820
We both know that you're too autistic to even do that.
Can't draw, can't prompt.

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 19 06:36:29 2023 No.6848824 >>6848823 >He's been making art for a while and more importantly he inspired a small art movement. literally who

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 19 06:37:08 2023 No.6848826 >>6848824 https://twitter.com/mrugleh

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 19 06:37:42 2023 No.6848827 >>6848823 what makes you think I can't type in a few keywords and play with some weights lmao. I did it with NovelAI for a month. can prompt, won't do it. it's a bunch of fucking keywords in a box you moron

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 19 06:39:25 2023 No.6848829 >>6848823 > in this thread all day > calling anyone autistic and pathetic Why don't you ask AI to generate some self awareness?

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 19 06:39:39 2023 No.6848830 >>6848823 >he inspired a small art movement he inspired an idiotic twitter trend. kind of like what shitty twitter artists do, but worse

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 19 06:43:33 2023 No.6848836 >>6848826 >This is Photoshop with just a touch of img2img to give off that AI filtered effect. I admit I wanted to do a"gotcha" to any AI haters but nobody was biting >end of the day nobody cared about his slop lol

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 19 06:47:00 2023 No.6848843 >>6848836 >9,595 Followers Post your socials.

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 19 06:59:28 2023 No.6848857 >>6848843 >muh pageviews Which one do you want? I have 5 alts so they total around 10000.

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 19 07:06:47 2023 No.6848868 >>6848857 I bet

Anonymous Tue Sep 19 07:28:47 2023 No.6848906
File: 651 KB, 1168x770, wow so epic trolled.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>some bunch of redditors who can't even use mspaint are gushing over this gimmick and circlejerking on xitter
not going to lie
these wannabe artists are pretty funny
>i am real artist i conducted the ai!!!
>no lmao
Reminds me of that other group of freaks

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 19 07:33:46 2023 No.6848910 >>6848906 imagine being this salty

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 19 07:38:54 2023 No.6848915 >>6848910 What big youtubereceleb said this word that now everyone is using it again?

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 19 07:55:02 2023 No.6848937 >>6848915 >why is everyone callling me salty all of a sudden You are salty.

Anonymous Tue Sep 19 08:47:02 2023 No.6849014
File: 350 KB, 608x927, charles allan gilbert_Deadly Reflections.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>6847524
Yes, humans made shrek with computers. Are you not understanding the point? Should I have said "wait til he discovers sculptures?" instead?

>>6848558
So who the fuck is earning a living with plain ol' ai 'art'? I don't think anyone is. Some artists are using it and drawing over it sure, but who is making a living just proompting?

>>6848469
Why'd you post such an ugly harsh looking version of the work?

>>6848915
I think it was Dan from the gamegrumps, if you're asking this seriously. But it's been like 10 years? It's just a popular usage of the word now.

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 19 09:01:03 2023 No.6849037 >>6847312 Yep, hehe.

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 19 09:14:30 2023 No.6849074 >>6845965 The only thing I want from AI is a sexbot, what the fuck is taking so long!

Anonymous Tue Sep 19 09:37:09 2023 No.6849118

>>6849014
>if you're asking this seriously
Yeah, i've been reading this shit everywhere the last few days as the usual non-answer to anything, like cope/seethe/schizo/rentfree and all the other buzzwords as to why i'm asking what kind of big eceleb blurted it out recently that now retarded sexually confused kids that get triggered at the sight of a vocabulary start spamming it

This other word is going to lose all meaning as well

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 19 09:43:27 2023 No.6849131 File: 72 KB, 602x440, discord tranny word index.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6848937 guess ill add this to the index

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 19 09:49:55 2023 No.6849138 >>6849131 this is the best /ic/ can draw

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 19 09:51:23 2023 No.6849142 File: 58 KB, 500x456, 15239894535645.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6849138 >he doesn't know

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 19 09:54:48 2023 No.6849151 >>6848814 AI artists aren't a thing

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 19 10:03:21 2023 No.6849165 >>6849151 https://aiartists.org/

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 19 11:15:39 2023 No.6849223 >>6849165 in that case I'm supreme leader of the galaxy with this troon-tier logic.

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 19 12:14:33 2023 No.6849269 >>6849131 Why u so salty bae?

Anonymous Tue Sep 19 16:16:22 2023 No.6849447

>>6844298
OP's example is just kind of gimmicky though. Its "impressive" in the sense that its cool that a machine can make something like this but on an artistic level its just not that interesting or new. If people really wanted to draw things like that they could and have, they just don't usually because its not that amazing of a concept.

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 19 17:37:42 2023 No.6849539 >>6849447 >but on an artistic level its just not that interesting or new The only reason it's being talked about is because it is novel and interesting.

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 19 21:07:20 2023 No.6849780 >>6849539 >because it is novel and interesting. anything is novel and interesting when your knowledge is minimal

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 19 21:51:04 2023 No.6849838 >>6848461 >>6844511 So this is just a controlnet thing right? Just upload some vague shape and prompt "city"? Or is this a new addon

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 19 22:49:55 2023 No.6849913 >>6845372 Why should we just diminish the standards of the arts just because more and more retards with shit education is taking over?

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 19 22:59:20 2023 No.6849927 >>6849838 >So this is just a controlnet thing right? yes

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 19 23:01:06 2023 No.6849929 >>6849913 We aren't, AI makes better art than most artists. Your obsession with the craft is just cope, the product was all that was ever important.

>>	Anonymous Wed Sep 20 00:15:31 2023 No.6849995 >>6849929 it doesn't make art, it generates pictures. you're just a dumb consoomer with no eye to speak off and trying to justify his mindless cunsumption

>>	Anonymous Wed Sep 20 00:26:13 2023 No.6850009 >>6849995 >it doesn't make art, it generates art gen·er·ate /ˈjenəˌrāt/ verb cause (something, especially an emotion or situation) to arise or come about. "changes that are likely to generate controversy"

Anonymous Wed Sep 20 00:39:48 2023 No.6850027

>>6850009
>>it doesn't make art, it generates art
pictures, not art
disingenuous
dĭs″ĭn-jĕn′yoo͞-əs
adjective
Not straightforward or candid; insincere or calculating.
Pretending to be unaware or unsophisticated; faux-naïf.
Unaware or uninformed; naive.

you sir, are a faggot. it is no more art than a beautiful sunset.

>>	Anonymous Wed Sep 20 03:34:29 2023 No.6850225 >>6844119 Im so disappointed that this is AI because its pretty cool and surprisingly well put together for AI

>>	Anonymous Wed Sep 20 03:37:01 2023 No.6850227 >normalfag dickriding [current thing] This is news.

>>	Anonymous Wed Sep 20 03:37:34 2023 No.6850228 >>6848906 >Im the director Oh no no no no

>>	Anonymous Wed Sep 20 03:37:53 2023 No.6850229 hello /v/ >>>/v/651427418

>>	Anonymous Wed Sep 20 04:47:48 2023 No.6850295 >>6850229 >They think that companies will lower their prices when using AI in development Are they literally retarded?

>>	Anonymous Wed Sep 20 05:01:19 2023 No.6850299 >>6850295 It happened to art why not video games?

>>	Anonymous Wed Sep 20 07:28:11 2023 No.6850390 >>6850299 because greedy corps gonna greed

Anonymous Wed Sep 20 07:29:18 2023 No.6850392

>>6850299
You think the same industry that shoves microtransactions into everything they can, nickel & dime the consumer as much as possible, have gambling in their games children play (surprise mechanics!), and only just raised their prices... are going to lower their prices when production costs go down? Pfft.

The line only goes up anon.

>>	Anonymous Wed Sep 20 07:30:29 2023 No.6850393 >>6850390 >>6850392 >samefagging Do you understand supply and demand?

>>	Anonymous Wed Sep 20 07:43:19 2023 No.6850405 >>6850393 Actually no >>6850295 >>6850392 These two are me. That other anon was just coincidentally responding to the same post at nearly the same time, with more or less the same opinion on the matter. Coincidences happen buddy.

Anonymous Wed Sep 20 07:45:44 2023 No.6850409

>>6850405
>>6850393
>Do you understand supply and demand?
Ah, and to your question; the video game industry is more profitable then ever, and also scrounging for more money than ever. It's corporate greed, not supply and demand.
Also, video game sales are mostly digital, there is no "supply". The supply is infinite.

>>	Anonymous Wed Sep 20 09:24:55 2023 No.6850477 >>6849539 The novelty is that its created by an AI not the actual content of the painting itself. Its like if an elephant painted a picture like this it would be impressive because of the author not because of the painting itself

>>	Anonymous Wed Sep 20 10:04:42 2023 No.6850490 >>6850393 nta, art is partially dissociated from supply and demand, relying more on perceived quality and perceived value. ironically the flood of aislop has lowered the value...of aislop

Anonymous Wed Sep 20 10:57:01 2023 No.6850513

>>6850490
That's true for some things but not for the majority of art. The clock is ticking on people purchasing stock images, logos, cover art, concept art, shit you hang on your wall etc. You can generate it for free or get someone else to do it, the labor cost for creating art is basically 0 and that will only improve. It'll take some time for people to realize that though.

>>6850409
Retarded post. Why did Dragon's Dogma not sell as well as Capcom hoped? Because it released after Dark Souls and Skyrim. There was no demand because the supply was met. AI will usher in an unprecedented age of game development, there will be orders of magnitude more games coming out compared to now. More supply of video games, less demand for any individual game. Thus the prices drop or no one will buy.

Anonymous Wed Sep 20 11:24:05 2023 No.6850526

>>6850513
>the labor cost for creating art is basically 0
it isn't, unless you assume ai generation is art, which makes you an uneducated nigger. and even those facsimile take energy and time thus ensuing a cost.
the rest of your rambling is wishful thinking oblivious to the current trends

>>	Anonymous Wed Sep 20 11:25:13 2023 No.6850527 Board is ruined and everyone sane knows it. /Ic is /fag nowadays.

>>	Anonymous Wed Sep 20 11:26:38 2023 No.6850528 >>6850526 It's literally free to generate images and images are art, you absolute drooling mongoloid lol. Your PC is already running, it doesn't cost a thing.

Anonymous Wed Sep 20 12:09:25 2023 No.6850561

>>6850513
You just vaguely said "supply and demand" and expected me to wring your wretched, and frankly half-baked, understanding and usage of it out of your statement... and you have the balls to call anyone else retarded?
>Because it released after Dark Souls and Skyrim. There was no demand because the supply was met.
Like what is this wrought usage of the term "supply and demand"? It's like me saying there's a demand for you shutting the fuck up, but there's a vastly inadequate supply. Could you ham-fist this any harder?
>AI will usher in an unprecedented age of game development, there will be orders of magnitude more games coming out compared to now. More supply of video games, less demand for any individual game. Thus the prices drop or no one will buy.
Yes, because when there's a oversupply, the producers will continue making EVEN MORE to exacerbate the problem...
To your Dragon's Dogma point, had they known it'd flop, would they still have made it? Also prices may remain high so as to ensure that with lowered sales that at least some money and profit is made.
And all this is vastly over-estimating the amount that AI can handle currently. You act as if AAA games are being made by single developers, and not still entire teams of people.
All this said, EVEN IF prices drop because competition is tighter and that many more games are being released, it doesn't mean there's more demand. The demand is still the same, just now the profit margins are that much slimmer. So how do you think they'd try to increase their margins? In-app purchases you fucking whale.
Enjoy your over-monetised corporate future!

>>	Anonymous Wed Sep 20 12:10:26 2023 No.6850563 >>6850561 >he in fact didn't know what supply and demand was and he's trying to act like I'm the retard kek

>>	Anonymous Wed Sep 20 12:42:13 2023 No.6850595 >>6850563 I'm sure both sides are thinking the same thing.

>>	Anonymous Wed Sep 20 12:43:26 2023 No.6850596 >>6850563 Everyone who didn`t hide this thread is a retard. So let me hide this sjw malding.

>>	Anonymous Wed Sep 20 15:55:26 2023 No.6850734 >>6846793 What's the point of this when it's just an optical illusion in "3D"? It only works from one angle, because it's not an actual set meant to look like an optical illusion, but an optical illusion made into a set.

>>	Anonymous Wed Sep 20 16:08:55 2023 No.6850751 we really need a competent janny, at least /v/ deletes half such threads

>>	Anonymous Wed Sep 20 16:24:42 2023 No.6850773 >>6850751 Actually a fair amount of these threads do get deleted.

>>	Anonymous Wed Sep 20 16:30:03 2023 No.6850780 File: 144 KB, 962x830, cat AI.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6848781 shut up retard, you're as interesting as a toxo infested litterbox digger

>>	Anonymous Wed Sep 20 16:32:54 2023 No.6850784 was that supposed to be an insult real woman moment

>>	Anonymous Thu Sep 21 01:35:33 2023 No.6851324 File: 78 KB, 687x608, F6d_YqWWwAAQUp4.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >human artists can't do this brand new art sty...

>>	Anonymous Thu Sep 21 01:48:08 2023 No.6851333 >>6851324 point in case

>>	Anonymous Thu Sep 21 02:05:45 2023 No.6851352 >>6848178 this isn't new, someone post that nicocado pumpkin asshole one

Anonymous Thu Sep 21 02:44:00 2023 No.6851394
File: 1.38 MB, 972x846, 1690236433721855.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>6851352
I was laughing a lot reading this thread and the social media comments, because 4chan was making them the moment we were able to, but normies took a year + controlnet basically and they weren't even half as entertaining.
I remember anons posting the high quality goatses on facebook and no one realizing what they were. Fucking comedy.

>>	Anonymous Thu Sep 21 02:45:04 2023 No.6851395 File: 1.33 MB, 1024x1024, 1689953510073639.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] the mods were so salty that they banned the posting of some of these images so you had to change the md5

>>	Anonymous Thu Sep 21 02:45:38 2023 No.6851398 File: 447 KB, 512x640, 1672505869917073.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Thu Sep 21 02:47:21 2023 No.6851401 File: 71 KB, 512x512, 1681012976115055.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Thu Sep 21 02:47:53 2023 No.6851403 File: 370 KB, 512x512, 1666402066479520.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Thu Sep 21 04:00:48 2023 No.6851468 behead all ainiggers

>>	Anonymous Thu Sep 21 06:53:05 2023 No.6851597 >>6851401 don't get it >>6851398 is this the soccer chick?

>>	Anonymous Thu Sep 21 07:01:54 2023 No.6851601 >>6851597 kek

>>	Anonymous Thu Sep 21 08:21:30 2023 No.6851646 >>6851333 It might not be as well rendered, but they did it. You can still clearly see the pattern. Are you that annoyed a mere human scribble owned the newest tech?

>>	Anonymous Thu Sep 21 08:54:58 2023 No.6851660 >>6851646 >it's like 1000x worse, b-but you got owned you owned yourself, wasted your time and made a fool out of yourself.

>>	Anonymous Thu Sep 21 09:04:02 2023 No.6851670 >>6851660 >you owned yourself, wasted your time and made a fool out of yourself. Haha, you actually made me laugh with this anon. Can you not see the irony in responding to me? You're so butt mad over a scribble that pulled off the effect, lol.

>>	Anonymous Thu Sep 21 09:28:50 2023 No.6851692 >>6851670 >self awareness: none I'm making fun of you..

>>	Anonymous Thu Sep 21 09:34:22 2023 No.6851699 >>6851692 Yes anon, I got that, and I'm laughing at you. Are you possibly retarded, why did you not understand that?

>>	Anonymous Thu Sep 21 09:35:55 2023 No.6851700 this is what desperation does to a person

Anonymous Thu Sep 21 12:07:20 2023 No.6851805

>>6846510
You're damn right. I come here to read artists thoughts and idéas and maybe expand my understanding on painting and drawing. Instead I have to sift through comments by a bunch of parasitical technerds with their smug attitudes larping as artists. Thinking they somehow have a place here. Thinking if they cry loud enough, they might be accepted as true creatives. Nobody will ever be like "whoa! Look at that AI artist. It's incredible! Look at the prompt. It's better than any human made painting I've ever seen! He's so talented. How did they do it?!

>4k, High res, river, woman in boat, relfective water, cumulus clouds, big Mountain, painted, realistic, look at me mom I'm the artist now

Delusional narcissistic bugmen

>>	Anonymous Thu Sep 21 13:19:03 2023 No.6851847 >>6851805 You have no self awareness and you've deluded yourself.

Advanced search
Text to find
Subject [?]Search by post subject. Leave empty for any.
Username [?]Search for user name. Leave empty for any user name.
Tripcode [?]Search for tripcode. Leave empty for any.
Email [?]Search by email. Leave empty for any.
Filename [?]Search by image filename. Leave empty for any.
From Date [?]Enter what date to start searching from. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
To Date [?]Enter what date to start searching until. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
Image hash
Search in	All Posts OPs Only
Deleted posts	Show all posts Show only deleted posts Only show non-deleted posts
Internal posts	Show all posts Show only internal posts Show only archived posts
Order	New posts first Old posts first
Capcode	All Posts Only by Users Only by Mods Only by Admins Only by Developers
Results	Posts Threads
Action	[ Simple ]

/ic/ - Artwork/Critique