[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

View post   
File: 156 KB, 1024x1024, F57dawWWoAAVgSu.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6843090 No.6843090 [Reply] [Original]

What's the best AI-generated art piece you've seen so far? I just stumbled upon this one and it's unironically great

>> No.6843094

>>6843090
Very cool.

>> No.6843095

>>6843090
ohayou gozaimsu

>> No.6843098

>>6843090
Is it supposed to look like shit?

>> No.6843104
File: 872 KB, 2000x1821, muh lewd sketchbook_02.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6843104

>>6843090
>What's the best AI-generated art piece you've seen so far?
This one. I coomed on this drawing after using a g-nib to draw it.
You meant Artificial Insemination, right?

>> No.6843113
File: 2.04 MB, 1536x1024, Motion Picture Classic Chrome Lords_01.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6843113

>>6843090
Was the checkerboard effect intentional? I will admit that the effect is quite appealing
As for good AI art? Not much has impressed me, though I did quite like the "film stills" for the made up film "Chrome Lords" - I think that shows how useful AI is for helping generate ideas to iterate from, and help give visual direction.

>> No.6843137

>>6843113
>Was the checkerboard effect intentional
Not him, but I mean, that's kinda the whole thing about it

>>6843090
That's original for sure, I like the idea. But it's not like it's something humans couldn't have thought of doing:the prompt was probably specific in this regard actually

>> No.6843145
File: 445 KB, 640x960, 00108-3857027680-(((masterpiec___.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6843145

>>6843090
best one I made

>> No.6843147

>>6843137
The idea is neat, but would you ever want to look at paintings made this way? It's not necessarily 'nice to look at' for a human.
After 6 months the fad would pass, and then the works would be dated AF.
Also, as it stands AI art is still the result of a computer requiring human programming, so this is something a human thought up, just used a new tool to take the workload off for themself.

>> No.6843149

>>6843147
>so this is something a human thought up, just used a new tool to take the workload off for themself.
That's like saying a human thought of a random number by using a random number generator.

>> No.6843150

>>6843090
This is an AI bait thread that has nothing to do with artworks or artwork critiques, it doesnt belong in /ic/. Simply report, hide and move on, dont give it a chance.

>> No.6843151
File: 1.52 MB, 1024x1024, 1670329888471522.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6843151

>>6843090
I find myself still shocked that this one is made by a computer

>> No.6843153

>>6843150
What board does this belong in then

>> No.6843157

>>6843150
the cat's out of the bag now, there's no point on getting angry at it, adapt and be happy with it

>> No.6843167

>>6843147
> After 6 months the fad would pass, and then the works would be dated AF.
I mean, the same idea done traditionally could make for an interesting painting that I'd be happy to hang around.

Don't get me wrong, I don't hold AI "art" in high estime, but I can't deny that the idea is original and visually fun.