/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

[Anonymous No.6841653]

So, which one /ic/?

[Anonymous No.6841685]

>>6841653
big jakt ofc

[Anonymous No.6841686]

>>6841653
I think the Big Jakt is generally more appealing. Some about the big to small, top heavy, look has a better looking shape to it.
Big buff guy with tiny legs is fun to look at, but a thin dude with kangaroo legs is gross.

[Anonymous No.6841688]

>>6841686
That's because big legs only works with alt girls taking photos of themselves.
>>6841653
Big jacket better.

[Anonymous No.6841708]

>>6841653
big pant is SOVL

[Anonymous No.6841711]

>>6841653
Pants for boys
Jakt for girls

[Anonymous No.6841730]

>>6841711
Literally the opposite

[Anonymous No.6841733]

>>6841730
>he wants girls to wear pants
this is a straight man’s board

[Anonymous No.6841740]

JAKT

[Anonymous No.6841743]

>>6841653
both

[Anonymous No.6841755]

>>6841730
xhe's right

[Anonymous No.6841764]

>>6841653
both are overused crutches for amateur character designers

[Anonymous No.6841767]

>>6841653
Is there a thing for big shoes and gloves? That kind of character design nourishes my soul

[Anonymous No.6841924]

pant

[Anonymous No.6841943]

>>6841653
Big pants for girls, big jackets for men. This emphasizes the natural balance of their bodies.
>>6841767
Yes, it's called Sonic character design. :^)

[Anonymous No.6841973]

>>6841755
x?
What is it, twitter?

[Anonymous No.6842018]

>>6841943
The furry bits and autistic fanbase always were off putting though. I like Sonic design elements on non-sonic characters if that makes sense

[Anonymous No.6842029]

>>6841653
>So, which one /ic/?


Whatever isn't some faggy twitter trend

[Anonymous No.6842030]

Visual proof >>6841688

>>6841733
>>6841711

[Anonymous No.6842032]

>>6842030
cute boy

[Anonymous No.6842033]

>>6841711
This man gets it
>>6841730
>>6841943
Maybe one day

[Anonymous No.6842034]

>>6841653
big pant

[Anonymous No.6842037]

>>6842030

Jesus is this 2003 again?

[Anonymous No.6842118]

>>6842037
i wish

[Anonymous No.6842139]

>>6841653
>thread is filled with jaktchads

[Anonymous No.6842159]

>>6841653
Both for girls
>Big Jacket with short shorts
>Big Pants with sports bra

[Anonymous No.6842363]

>>6842118
I wish so too

[Anonymous No.6842504]

>>6841653
clothes?

[Anonymous No.6843009]

>>6841733
t. faggot in the closet

[Anonymous No.6843924]

>>6841653
Both, obviously.
That's like asking if circles or squares are the best shape language.

[Anonymous No.6846965]

>>6841653
very puffy sleeves

[Anonymous No.6847026]

>>6846965
tranny hands

[Anonymous No.6849597]

>>6841653
Why not both?

[Anonymous No.6849813]

Fixed it.

[Anonymous No.6849921]

>>6849813
I align closest to this as I vote big OVRJAKT Chad

[Anonymous No.6849962]

That image was a reddit litmus test for the twitter art community.

[Anonymous No.6849964]

>>6849962
what the fuck does that even mean

[Anonymous No.6849965]

>>6849964
Rub your last two braincells together and try to work it out

[Anonymous No.6849970]

>>6849965
a litmus test for what exactly, retard? The degree of redditude artists were? you said some retarded zoomer shit as if it actually made sense and got upset when it didn't

[Anonymous No.6849977]

>>6849970
wow you got it, apparently i did make sense faggot.

calling people reddit is not zoomer you moron. glad we could walk you through understanding a single sentence together.

[Anonymous No.6849996]

>>6849977
>>6849965
Why are you acting like you got something non-lubed up your ass?

[Anonymous No.6850023]

>>6841653
full nakey

[Anonymous No.6850202]

>>6841653
tough decision

[Anonymous No.6850284]

BUNCH OF JACKETNIGGER PEDERASTS SHOULD GET THE ROPE

Big pants = upright triangle
Big jacket = upside-down triangle

If you like upright triangles, you like stability, security, balance. You're a man of order and control.
The big pants give authority to the figure not through phony, flamboyant portrayals of a muscular body, but through his immunity to the whims of the environment. His upper body holds all the mobility and freedom to pursue his endeavors, while his legs remain strong as pillars to all of this.

What to JACKETFAGGOTS have? Tiny legs that will quaver at the merest sight of a pantchad. Like a man who has to hold too many lemons for his own arms. A comedian - no -, a clown trying to entertain others with his obnoxious, unnatural and ominous mass about to fall at any moment.
An unstable figure for unstable people, who seek nothing but instant gratification. It's all about the momentum the jacket gives you, because your thin, pathetic body can't take decisions or responsibility for itself. So it will gladly allow the jacket to take the lead. Wherever the pendulum swings, there goes the jacketmaggot.

Pantricians will stay where they are and stand their ground. They choose when to lift their legs and make a move. They don't hide who they are and this lack of intimidation is exactly what intimidates jaggots who think the world is a game of chicken.

It is also the case for female characters. A top-heavy figure means fake boobs, coats, pelts, artificially long legs by a con artist on high heels, trying to look imposing and domineering, any "man" who'd prefer that is downright asking to be walked around on a leash.

A pant-shaped woman isn't necessarily using pants, but their divine-given garment with a similar triangle: skirts. Dresses. Traditional, firm, loyal.

Same applies to hair, short-haired women take away from their own triangle shape in favor of the degenerate JACKET WORSHIP, it disgusts me to no end and the day of the needles can't come soon enough.

[Anonymous No.6850330]

>>6850284
Everything you're saying about the symbolism of triangles is true, but that can make it an excellent device for composition, as I have illustrated here. Bottom-heavy men are established and unflappable, but top-heavy men make very compelling protagonists.

[Anonymous No.6850336]

>>6850330
>the masses prefer chaos and degeneracy
No shit, Sherlock.

The reason they give women pants, hats, heels and all sorts of top-heavy details is to turn delicate, feminine little girls into unhinged, jacket-loving whores.

And guys from strong and reliable family leaders into chaotic anarchist shitstains.

[Anonymous No.6850343]

>>6850336
To be clear I pretty much agree with your assessment of the world situation, and how things should be. We should all strive to be pyramids, not spinning tops. But you know, you are an artist instead of a cobbler or lumberjack or something, and telling compelling visual stories about chaos resolving into order is foundational to the medium.

[Anonymous No.6850356]

>>6850343
Only a desperate preacher would overly rely on the jacket as his way to sway the masses and invite the enemy into his universe of thought.

Many artists, me included, seek to instead converse with his own kind, to reassure the ones who understand beauty that there is such harmony in life. To remind them - or even awaken, in those who have strayed - that the stable triangle is an ideal to be pursued and appreciated.

Union, organization in this painting.

[Anonymous No.6850359]

>>6850356
But grace and peace in this one.

The JACKET MENACE is like dissonant music. It should be a sore, not a role model. One should appreciate the victory of a flawed protagonist, but not to aspire to his "charismatic" broken self.

I am glad we are in accord.

[Anonymous No.6850361]

>>6850356
But grace and peace in this one.

The JACKET MENACE is like dissonant music. It should be a sore, a temporary imbalance begging for resolution, not a role model. One should appreciate the victory of a flawed protagonist in reshaping himself into a real triangle, but not to aspire to his "charismatic" broken self, as is often the case portrayed by "artists" who celebrate their shortcomings instead of dealing with them.

I am glad we are in accord.

[Anonymous No.6850370]

>>6850356
>>6850361
Well said, very well indeed. Sometimes I do wonder if the tale of the flawed protagonist is a juvenile one, and if I should pursue pantsy idealism instead of jackety fantasy.

Also, man is it hard to find any classical paintings with upside-down triangle composition.

[Anonymous No.6851501]

>>6850202
bump

[Anonymous No.6851508]

>>6851501
Big pants fall down and girl is naked
Big jacket covers girl from neck down, more coverage the bigger the jacket.
Pant win

[Anonymous No.6851517]

>>6851508
a true man of culture appreciates the aperture created by coverage, so I will have to go with the jacket

[Anonymous No.6853413]

>>6841653
Generally I prefer doing big dresses when making triangles figures

[Anonymous No.6856597]

>>6841653
Actual point asside, really hate this type of irony (not sure exactly what to call it). Like have the damn confidence to just say "which one do you like" dont do this coy "erm le pant" thing. Have some sincerity.
>What do u like? Le big pant, or epic jakt, teehee
Or
>Which character design archetype do you like the most, large pants, or large jacket?

[Anonymous No.6857817]

>>6856597
on one hand I agree, but on the other, it’s just twitterspeak, no different than 4chan jargon
literally all 4chan lingo is ironic repetition of something stupid that eventually gets taken at face value by newfags

[Anonymous No.6858008]

>>6856597
it's not a question of irony vs sincerity, learn what words mean, stop watching tiktok as a replacement for education

[Anonymous No.6858023]

>>6856597
i agree completely
if twitter recommends me people who post shit like this i mute them, but they still always pop up because this type of person only draws with attention and social media algorithms in mind

[Anonymous No.6858076]

>>6858023
>this type of person only draws with attention and social media algorithms in mind
oh how terrible—being noticed!

[Anonymous No.6858642]

>>6858076
>drawing corny and insincere memebait instead of trying to improve
>terrible
yes

[Anonymous No.6859636]

>>6856597
You're just getting old bro

[Anonymous No.6861598]

>>6856597
>people can't have different opinions
Go back

[Anonymous No.6862635]

>>6857817
4chan speak is also often just as shitty and annoying. But both twitter and 4chan are entire sites, it's more of a specific archetype. But I get what you are saying, and is often the case.

>>6858008
What?

>>6859636
I'm 20, but maybe that is old.

>>6861598
I feel that you misread what I wrote.

[Anonymous No.6862786]

>>6841653
jakt

[Anonymous No.6864064]

>>6850284
>Order
Order can only be brought through chaos, the jacket represents a push towards the hard and unforgiving ground. Paving a new path for those too meek to suffer.
You are too scared to face the hardships of life. Too weak to balance yourself and the world around you.
You are not a world builder, you are not a beacon of society or culture. You are the result of the stability brought upon by jacket wearing people, the parasite believing itself to be part of the host.
You are a mockery of nature.

[Anonymous No.6864634]

>>6864064
Unrelentlessly does the unstable jacketeer warp and weft his way around admitting his own "daringness" is a cry for help.

Those who favor pants have already found their place in the world. Change for the sake of change is pointless, unless you don't belong.
Most who try to jacketforce a way through the world will be sorely disappointed, as all they will find are even bigger jackets to wear or chase after.
They might try to gravitate around pants, but soon the weight of their frivolity will take them away, while the pantsome remain grounded, satisfied.

One might argue that the world needs jackets to improve, and it's no doubt possible for jackets to make big, impactful contributions to society.
Yet their destructive power is the same, and there are more evil jackets than good jackets in the world.
Pants cannot be evil, they can only be. On their own, independent of the surroundings. The only crime of a panter might be that of inaction, non-involvement, never of active evil/harm done.

Therefore, only jackets who have contributed tangibly to societal change can say anything about the "sheeple" ways of the upright triangle. If you pride yourself in being an embodiment of chaos, your intentions might be good, but your ability to administer what you've been given in life might not be.
It is true a world of pants might be tacitly complicit with the status quo on a macroscopic scale, but if you have an idea at all of a society that needs to be fixed, that society only exists because, on a microscopic level, those pantriarchs act as the backbone for social cohesion and a pillar for their community.

Go, try and be a lucky jacket, successfully bombing the UN or something valuable like that, but know if there's ever a time when your job feels done, you will hang those silly, bolstered up shoulders and slip into some fat, nice pair of pants.

>>6856597
Correct. Can't go on YT without reading that a song slaps fire yo such a bop. What happened to "I like this song"?

[Anonymous No.6864910]

Pant>>6841653

[Anonymous No.6865381]

>>6864634
You type like an underage shut in that tries to overthink everything, yet fails to formulate basic arguments.
Please, reconsider your life choices. You still have time.

[Anonymous No.6865403]

>>6865381
yeah no like fr im thinking cringe af
lil bro likes jakt like lmaaaaooo (skull emoji)

Is that more your speed, jaggot?

[Anonymous No.6865411]

jacket because legs are hot

[Anonymous No.6866022]

>>6841653
Jakit

[Anonymous No.6866962]

>>6841653
Top heavy characters look masculine and badass
Bottom heavy characters look sexy, but that weight has to be concentrated in their ass and thighs, not the bottom of their pants. Therefore big pant is inferior. Only characters that have big pant are side characters from 20 years ago that lived in ghetto or something

[Anonymous No.6870474]

>>6866962
>bottom heavy badass characters though..

[Anonymous No.6872590]

>>6841686
Big thick legs look appealing on women.
The big jacket thing can look good on both men and women.

[Anonymous No.6873487]

>>6841740
Hiita Chad hiita Chad hiita chad

[Anonymous No.6873500]

PANT is the Superior.

[Anonymous No.6873550]

>>6864910
why cant she wear skirt like a normal girl, fucking disgusting

[Anonymous No.6876404]

.bump

[Anonymous No.6876461]

>>6841711
It's naturally the more appealing configuration. Big jacket can work for young girls if you're trying to emphasize their smallness, big pants can work for "pretty boys" if you're trying to play up their femininity.

[Anonymous No.6876743]

neither!

[Anonymous No.6877190]

>>6850336
>The reason they give women pants, hats, heels and all sorts of top-heavy details is to turn delicate, feminine little girls into unhinged, jacket-loving whores.
kek, you have a way with words anon

[Anonymous No.6877358]

>>6842030
Would
>>6842118
So real

[Anonymous No.6877644]

>>6873500
That one was already made before you know.

[Anonymous No.6878017]

>>6849813
BIG PANKT

[Anonymous No.6880062]

>>6849813
exactly what i was thinking

[Anonymous No.6881376]

>>6841767
Isn't that just disney?

[Anonymous No.6881396]

Are overalls big jackets or big pants

[Anonymous No.6881666]

>>6842118
not me, 2003-2011 was the worse 8 yrs of my life

[Anonymous No.6882004]

need big jakt refs or cool fashion refs

[Anonymous No.6884738]

>>6847026
that anon is a better artist than you kek

[Anonymous No.6887005]

Bumpin

[Anonymous No.6887173]

>>6881666
Full body bacne?

[Anonymous No.6889017]

Jakt gang

[Anonymous No.6889070]

>>6842037
have you gone outside lately? i dunno about you but in my area all the teenagers dress like its 2003 again. y2k fashion is in full swing again. i hope im not the only one who sees this

[Anonymous No.6889081]

>>6889017
I love everything about this style are you familiar with the term "abunakawaii"?

[Anonymous No.6890367]

>>6841653
pants are funnier looking

[Anonymous No.6891636]

I enjoy pants occasionally

[Anonymous No.6893496]

bump