[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

View post   
File: 113 KB, 1080x1080, F3MIH0pWIAACPCv.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6788846 No.6788846 [Reply] [Original]

Why do white weebs feel the need to baby Japanese artists?
>inb4 "muh color theory" "muh lighting"
Yeah no, this is whitewashing. Bashing others for pointing it out is not okay.
https://twitter.com/Kuromi_044/status/1690074800960487424
Here's a helpful thread on why this is wrong <3

>> No.6788869

>>6788846
Whitewashing. You terminally online retard.
Redraw and colour and stylise as you like.
Were you there to stand against the scores of 'blackwashed' characters in media? No. Because you're not obsessed with maintaining character consistency, you're just anti white.

>> No.6788871
File: 834 KB, 1023x1077, 1557814220453.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6788871

Ironic shitposting is still shitposting.

>> No.6788915

>>6788846
Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

>> No.6788922
File: 77 KB, 220x156, facepalm-annoyed.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6788922

>>6788846
>Why do white weebs feel the need to baby Japanese artists?

Idiot

>> No.6788924

>>6788846
maybe she's half gerudo

>> No.6788928

>>6788846
>twittertard fails to realize the same tone of skin will not look the same under different lighting
>/ic/'s most distinguished and intelligent gentlemen fail to realize that replying to a bait thread makes it worse. AGAIN.

>> No.6788932

>>6788846
Dark skin is ugly. Simple as.

>> No.6788935

>>6788846
Nice thinly veiled brigade thread.
>not your personal army etc.

>> No.6788949 [DELETED] 

>>6788846
>Why do white weebs feel the need to baby Japanese artists?
Those aren't weebs, they are antis, and they hate everything related to anime and manga.

>> No.6788955
File: 587 KB, 1448x2048, washing.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6788955

>>6788846
cope, you hypocrite

>> No.6788964

>>6788846
You stop blackwashing and we'll talk nigger

>> No.6788969

>>6788955
Both are retarded desu
It's all fucking stupid though, let artists create art and just ignore it if it offends you.

>> No.6788975

>>6788969
Either both exist or none exist, hypocrites can shove their heads up their asses.

>> No.6788980

Serious question I don't care about whitewashing but that light doesn't seem bright enough to result in that skin tone or am I wrong? It seems a shade too light compared to the right.

>> No.6788986

>>6788980
Dumb fuck, it absolutely doesn't matter at all.
The character is clearly darker skinned. It doesn't matter if they captured the exact perfect shade of nigger in that lighting.

>> No.6788990

>>6788986
I'm asking from a values perspective because I'm studying light, I don't care what shade people use for whatever character this is.

>> No.6788996

>>6788990
Then yes, you're correct. The original shade of brown the characters skin is wouldn't be that light with that lighting.

>> No.6789003

>>6788996
I figured, but the twitter weebs are all going "learn how lighting works!!" The real answer should be that it's just a drawing who cares what shade it is.

>> No.6789007

>>6789003
Yeah, this isn't an issue of different lighting at all. Twitter users are entirely retarded when it comes to lighting though, both retards claiming white washing, and retards defending it. They used the """"wrong"""" shade. It just doesn't matter at all.

>> No.6789014
File: 564 KB, 1280x1920, Rui_Hachimura.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6789014

>>6788846
Dont worry the Japanese are getting replace since their race are pathetic incels who cant have sexy time.

>> No.6789029

>>6788846
>Here's a helpful thread on why this is wrong <3

if you're gonna end it with that emote then you're a child, or maybe have a mind of one