Is ai good or bad?

[Anonymous No.6743162]

I recently found out an japanese artist I like uses ai to assist then with their art, shota on milf, like 80% of it is done in ai. The dude used to just draw normally but switched halfway through with a mix of ai techniques.

Is AI good or bad? It seems like it would change a lot if industries.

[Anonymous No.6743166]

>>6743162
Some korean and japanese artists are already getting replaced according to a few articles I saw online.

[Anonymous No.6743174]

>>6743162
>no artist posted
>just indian shills trying to change public opinion

[Anonymous No.6743179]

>>6743174

[Anonymous No.6743182]

>>6743179

[Anonymous No.6743183]

>>6743182
Before ai

[Anonymous No.6743187]

>>6743162
>if industries
A lot of industries.

[Anonymous No.6743190]

GET BANNED GET BANNED GET BANNED PLAP PLAP PLAP GET BANNED PLAP PLAP PLAP PLAP

[Anonymous No.6743191]

>>6743162
It always happen with stagnant old fucks that grew to hate drawing and got tempted.

[Anonymous No.6743194]

it is bad, stop pushing the propoganda

[Anonymous No.6743195]

>>6743190
What?

[Anonymous No.6743197]

>>6743195
PLAP PLAP PLAP

[Anonymous No.6743198]

>>6743197
Heh
>>6743194
What propaganda, overall I checked on youtube and people seem to be very mixed on the technology.

[sage No.6743203]

>>6743162
Please, make an /ai/ general

[Anonymous No.6743205]

>>6743166
Ai is democratizing art, adapt or die.

[Anonymous No.6743216]

>>6743205
ai is fucking up art, kill it or kill yourself

[Anonymous No.6743223]

>>6743216
>ai is fucking up art, kill it or kill yourself

How? Al it seems to be doing is making it a bit more accesible, like how translation services like bing translate made translation more acessible to the average person. The average person likes free stuff and will go through many lenghts to get free stuff, usualy the people who complain the most are the ones being upset that it would hurt their profits. Take adobe for example hating people who pirate their software and going after pirates. Similar thing with nintendo.

[Anonymous No.6743226]

>>6743205
ai fags tell liberals ai democratizes art
and then tell right wingers ai is making liberals seeth

[Anonymous No.6743228]

AI is going to take over every industry, faster than most people think.
I agree with the "if you can't beat them, join them" crowd.
AI art is actually pretty cool once you get into it a bit more.

[Anonymous No.6743233]

>>6743183
Honestly I still like his artwork it is pretty hot

[Anonymous No.6743245]

>>6743226
Aka based

[Anonymous No.6743260]

>>6743162
It's good, lots of people will be able to make cool stuff now with it, sucks for the people that get fired but they'll get a new job

[Anonymous No.6743264]

least astroturfed AInigger thread

[Anonymous No.6743278]

>>6743228
There's no joining with AI garbage, only submission into mindless consumerism.

[Anonymous No.6743279]

>>6743162
>>6743166
>>6743174
>>6743179
>>6743182
>>6743183
>>6743187
>>6743190
>>6743191
>>6743194
>>6743195
>>6743197
>>6743198
>>6743203
>>6743205
>>6743216
>>6743223
>>6743226
>>6743228
>>6743233
>>6743245
>>6743260
>>6743264
AI will not make you women codetroons.

[Anonymous No.6743282]

>>6743162
>>6743166
>>6743174
>>6743179
>>6743182
>>6743183
>>6743187
>>6743190
>>6743191
>>6743194
>>6743195
>>6743197
>>6743198
>>6743203
>>6743205
>>6743216
>>6743223
>>6743226
>>6743228
>>6743233
>>6743245
>>6743260
>>6743264
>>6743278
>>6743279

[Anonymous No.6743285]

>>6743162 (OP)
>>6743166
>>6743174
>>6743179
>>6743182
>>6743183
>>6743187
>>6743190
>>6743191
>>6743194
>>6743195
>>6743197
>>6743198
>>6743203
>>6743205
>>6743216
>>6743223
>>6743226
>>6743228
>>6743233
>>6743245
>>6743260
>>6743264
>>6743278
>>6743279
>>6743282

[Anonymous No.6743292]

>>6743205
Art was already democratized, you're just a lazy faggot.

[Anonymous No.6743294]

>>6743282
>>6743285
Honestly if bots are just gonna post ai shit on here over and over again then I'd rather just watch gore instead

[Anonymous No.6743295]

>>6743279
>>6743282
>>6743285
THE GOYIM KNOW, SHUT IT DOWN JANNIES

[Anonymous No.6743296]

>>6743233
Those armpits are atrocious.

[Anonymous No.6743298]

>>6743292
Democracy is when your place of occupation gets bombed to dust and your ruling class killed or crippled and you're supposed to be happy about it.

[Anonymous No.6743312]

Someone should ask these AI using artists why we should give a fuck or support them anymore when we can use the same tool to pump out even better art than them.

[Anonymous No.6743421]

>>6743294
>everyone I don't like is a bot
>someone asking a question on an art fourm is a bot
Go back to rddit, 4chan isn't a place to circlejerk

[Anonymous No.6743435]

>>6743421
>blah blah blah reddit blah blah blah
lmao, scratched disk repeating the same shit. Tell your programmer I said fuck you.

[Anonymous No.6743520]

>An AI made this
Damn I'm in love, how am I suppose to hate this? It warms my heart

[Anonymous No.6743524]

>>6743520
It amazes me to no end how even with the best of the best art scraped from top artists, every single model just produces that plastic look that gives away its AI regardless of deformities

[Anonymous No.6743531]

>>6743524
Yeah it gives away a very special vibe but I still like it

I would even say some ecchi AI pics give some sort of degenerate vibe I love, I can't put my finger on what but it may be that plastic thing. Why does it make me really hard? There's an special aura to it that drags me in.

[Anonymous No.6743542]

>>6743531
You like garbage, just like there are some people that like the taste of literal shit.

[Anonymous No.6743546]

>>6743542
I love that you're upset at something that you don't have control over, nor can stop.

Real artists couldn't care less about AI, some are even getting it into their workflow.

Only retards like you who built an ego on making lines are this hurt about it, sad!.

[Anonymous No.6743557]

>>6743546
lol are all AItards this sensitive? I only said you have bad taste, which is true btw.

[Anonymous No.6743558]

>>6743546
I mean it is sad, it still scrapes and competes in the same market as those same artists. Not to mention it'll probably discourage newer budding artists now as well. Even worse is, the few pipelines for growth upwards is also stunted. Regardless of how you feel about it, it doesn't help as much as you'd think in this state. Not to mention real artists in game dev can't even use ai in this form because of the unknowns of legality that are yet to be brought to court

[Anonymous No.6743565]

>>6743546
Cool, now take that shit elsewhere because I'm sick of it shitting up my feed.

[Anonymous No.6743568]

>>6743557
Calling others sensible when you had your ego sent to outer space and back is not very smart anon

Shouldn't have based your personality on drawing and you might enjoy AI as well, but this is your fate, a future where you'll be upset forever

[Anonymous No.6743569]

Can AI artists even develop a sort of style or a following around a certain style? What would make a potential client choose one particular AI artist over the other?

[Anonymous No.6743571]

>>6743568
Settle down, man. You're projecting too hard.

[Anonymous No.6743580]

>>6743558
There's no real reason to get upset over AI unless you're a professional artist, which most people here aren't. heck a lot of Koreans seem to be using it to create references.

>Vidya
I don't remember what company in Japan is already using them, I think Nintendo had something with AI art. It's a matter of time, but it's a win for all.

[Anonymous No.6743587]

>>6743571
I'm just telling you the truth anon, I know it might upset you right now, but as long as you realize and move on it will better for you. It's either this or you will keep having mindless meltdowns at every chance you come across an AI picture, which will just increase.

[Anonymous No.6743594]

>>6743580
That’s the issue, a lot of beg, and int and potential talent will dry up in the future and I worry for the inevitable lack of great and new in terms of the content that would be produced.

I couldn’t care less about the established artists, they’re good enough to survive but those who would’ve been the one to grow in the future are at risk

[Anonymous No.6743600]

>>6743587
He was telling the truth too, there’s a reason why all of these images have that consistent look beyond the styles they’re interpolating and that int/ can sniff it out instantly

[Anonymous No.6743614]

Why is it that there's always an oddly well-timed influx of AI shilling whenever AI gets into legal debacles? What a strange coincidence, a true brain twister, a real mystery

[Anonymous No.6743628]

>>6743614
Go back to your board please

[Anonymous No.6743631]

>>6743600
I wonder how things will evolve, this tech is really in its infancy

I'm more upset about not having proper AI voice emulator, so porn voice overs that charge $40 a minute can go broke.

[Anonymous No.6743644]

>>6743183
No way. I've been bussin to this guy's stuff for years.

[Anonymous No.6743648]

>>6743628
>Go back to your board please
> from a /g/ shitter
kys

[Anonymous No.6743699]

>>6743614
We've gotten ai threads every day for a year you retard

[Anonymous No.6743704]

>>6743614
you mean when AI is in the news, people think about it more? whoa incredible, any other words of wisdom you wish to share?

[Anonymous No.6743714]

>>6743704
Now explain the exact same talking points espoused by AI friends day and day out.

[Anonymous No.6743717]

these threads will never stop regardless if we ignore it or not, they will get louder and louder and keep repeating overtime

I don't know if this is financial desperation, clout chasing or just some misguided understanding of what A.I. means but its just sad to see the damage it has done to that medium of hobby

[Anonymous No.6743721]

>>6743614
Probably another site starts banning AI generated content again. Last I knew of was Steam lol.

[Anonymous No.6743722]

>>6743183
I can't believe i forgot this guy name. Who is he and have his fans realized hes using ai?

[Anonymous No.6743725]

they came swarming when it was banned on fanbox lol

[Anonymous No.6743742]

>>6743717
Kek, what damage you insufferable lunatic? The only thing damaged here is your ego

[Anonymous No.6743747]

AI is good, why wouldn't it be?

If you're worried about not being able to sell art to other people, then you're misunderstanding art

[Anonymous No.6743753]

>>6743747
2/10

[Anonymous No.6743755]

>>6743747
Don't waste time
They can't reply with arguments, only feelings they got imposed by someone else

[Anonymous No.6743757]

>>6743755
Arguments have been made over and over, even above in the comments if you scroll up a bit 1/10

[Anonymous No.6743759]

>>6743755
>only feelings they got imposed by someone else
How do you unironically post something like this when the very generative models are based off of the works of other people in the first place absolute fucking kek

[Anonymous No.6743760]

>>6743753
AI may one day be able to provide enough art to sate the need of consumption, but AI will never sate the need to express oneself

[Anonymous No.6743762]

>>6743753
>>6743757
Art is about the outer expression of your inward mind. Art is soul. Create and experience art for the sake of it alone. AI doesn't change this

[Anonymous No.6743766]

>>6743762
Thanks for your worthless opinion when everything art related is worth value and people will pay for that value for that reason. Maybe if you're so out of touch with society that you have the funds to sustain that thinking then feel free to do it for that reason.

This weird expression of art as some nebulous thing makes it even more stupid to think using something like ai to gacharoll your SoUl is somehow an expression is the funniest part of this

[Anonymous No.6743768]

>>6743766
I'm sorry you feel that way

[Anonymous No.6743769]

>>6743768
and Im sorry the rest of the world can't live in the fantasy of delusions like you. Not that I disagree wholly, a world where people don't have to worry about financials and pursue art for the sake of art sounds amazing in theory, but we're never going to be able to get there.

[Anonymous No.6743770]

>>6743762
The way you aifag "express" yourself through your gacha slop machine is no different than a random dude googling dumb meme pic to express that his day was shit.

[Anonymous No.6743771]

>>6743757
don't bother, they're both blind and deaf now and will never gaze nor listen to anything you say about A.I.

its the reality they've chosen to cope with their failure so they're beyond help now, just let them wallow in their A.I. reality and just move along

[Anonymous No.6743773]

>>6743759
You can't be this retarded can't you?

Artists that trace other artists to "study" and most of the times make their drawings as entire out references are supposed to be different? because..they just are!!

Truth is that at the end of the day AI art is just a tool for people to have fun, same way as art. Sad fucks like you that take it personal get what they deserve

I don't even understand what people like you are trying to accomplish by the way, it's like schizos trying to fight vaccines in modern age, it's here and it's here to stay

[Anonymous No.6743776]

>>6743771
>Cope with their failure
Case in point, see how this anon tries to inject an ego-based argument into the discussion

Sad, again, this is what happens when you based your entire personality/life on one trait

[Anonymous No.6743784]

>>6743773
Maybe I missed it, but since when do we consider machine learning from LLM's the same as learning from reference as humans again? This point has been brought up since the beginning and it's been moot this entire time. Even the USCO put out a statement saying it's inevitably a dice roll to use gAI and therefore it isn't original nor is it copyrightable.

Let's also just ignore the fact that artists can draw from imagination? Or even just the fact that there's a monumental difference between an artist using a reference to draw vs a generated image from a model. But sure, let's just swipe that all away and say it's the same.

If you have fun with it go for it, but the vast majority and the lurking danger of it comes from corporations inevitably phasing out and removing the pipelines for future potential artists because cheaper and faster even off of the works of the same artists are being used to compete against them. There's probably a reason why there's huge strikes with AI as a pivotal point in the news for writers and actors right now right?

>I don't even understand what people like you are trying to accomplish by the way,
Says the retard pushing AI for people who want to learn to draw? Are you daft

[Anonymous No.6743786]

>>6743776
Hell of a better skill to have when applying for jobs than some random schmuck who says they're good at prompting lmao what a cope one liner you got there

[Anonymous No.6743787]

>>6743773
I apologize for striking a nerve, but at least you recognize how dumb that sentence you typed was kek

[Anonymous No.6743789]

>>6743773
tracing is considered a fraud

you basically claim its yours even though you've just overlaid and trace it from other works, so it removes any originality of your piece

you're just lazy and angry to other talents that do better than you and running to A.I. to cope with than accept your failure makes it even worst

I clearly get how you people think and in my experience I too know how painful it is to fail, but running to A.I. wont fix anything, by the end its just an image generator, and you saying that its "fun" its just a thin veil you've draped over yourself to hide the tears and refuse reality by continuing to live a lie will not help

either way I know you wont even bother reading all of this since you're beyond reach right now, so I posted a pic to keep you distracted

[Anonymous No.6743807]

>>6743784
An AI is doing an original drawing with the prompt you gave to it. Sure it's using all the data from other artists, so? It's making something new, period. This "copyright" meme debate is nothing but a tantrum from sheep minded people like ITT who simply don't understand it or think they have even a chance to stop it. Japan already approved it and so will everyone else.

>Says the retard pushing AI for people who want to learn to draw? Are you daft
Lol, lmao. People who solely use the AI were never interested in drawing, how can't you not see this?

It's not even wrong by the way, there's a difference between wanting a picture of X thing and enjoying the process of making X. What you and the other sad fucks are mad about is that now you can do something close to X without engaging in the actual process.

This is why AI art is successful despite being obviously "plastic" and why it doesn't even need to reach 1:1, because people don't care and just want to have it for very specific purposes.

>>6743789
See this other retard here, case in point again. It's people who do not understand

[Anonymous No.6743809]

>>6743773
Yeah and artist don't go out their way chanting and celebrating the death of all artist and wishing their complete replacement to those artist they were inspired to like you ai parasitic subhuman scum.And no matter you much you aifag cry, your machine is not fucking human and will never have the same right as human.

The only reason why AIfag cry so much about AI right and try to equate them to human so bad is because they somehow think if it's validated, all the accomplishment the AI has done will transfer to them. Then the subhuman will call the AI they defend the right so hard is just a tool lmao, absolute scum behaviour.

AIfags don't have any principle. They only want to exploit everything they can with AI with one excuse after another, lie and then switch with another excuse so that they can be a lazy parasite and demand every respect and money they can get from their slop machine.

[Anonymous No.6743814]

Seriously though, if I were you people I would find a better way to cope, at least ignore it and try to get mad over it. This tech is in its infancy and it will be the next thing after the internet, Nvidia is already fully focusing their designs on it

Either you embrace it like Asians do or the future will be tough as fuck

[Anonymous No.6743817]

>>6743807
An AI is doing an original drawing with the prompt you gave to it. Sure it's using all the data from other artists, so? It's making something new, period. This "copyright" meme debate is nothing but a tantrum from sheep minded people like ITT who simply don't understand it or think they have even a chance to stop it. Japan already approved it and so will everyone else.
No it's not you fucking retard. It's anything within the bounds of interpolation between images in the training data. It's not new, that's why models will need more and more actual training data to get better as time progresses you fucking dunce. If it could create anything "new" then there would be no need for iterative change to the models and updates to the training.

>Japan already approved it and so will everyone else.
Japan hasn't passed any laws whatsoever to make it easier, i swear the same bait articles come up, even when sites are slowly banning posting ai images for a reason.

>What you and the other sad fucks are mad about is that now you can do something close to X without engaging in the actual process.
Like I said, I couldn't care less about bootlickers like you, it's the companies and corporations taking advantage of the situation and cutting out present and future artists if things don't change. I hold no ill will towards you since you're okay with the idea of using other's works and that you seem to realize the model generates the brunt of the work. If you're okay with that and calling that expression that's on you as pathetic as it is.

[Anonymous No.6743818]

>>6743162
AI art will force its way through in hobbies that are routinely done solo and require a mixture of skill-sets; animation, videogame dev, videogame modding, etc. These types of creations usually takes hundreds to thousands of hours to finish so nobody is going to scoff at a way to speed up the process; even if it's rough and rudimentary.
Pure artists are just fighting an uphill battle.

[Anonymous No.6743830]

>>6743312
They would probably enjoy it if you did that. AI artists are very inclusive of others joining into their hobby.
AI art is the freest kind of art after all.

[Anonymous No.6743833]

>>6743818
anon will you routinely be sucking on techbro cocks for every fucking thing since you clearly want to shill AI for free
I'm pretty sure this is like almost the 8th thread you niggas made after the fucking adobe surveillance L
>you basically are the fucking hugbox reinforcement squad at this point for it

[Anonymous No.6743836]

>>6743833
I have no allegiance to any group except for free and open source software. I don't care about 'techbros' because they don't support FOSS.
>I'm pretty sure this is like almost the 8th thread you niggas made after the fucking adobe surveillance L
What's wrong with that? AI art is still art; and this is an art board, so it belongs here.
>you basically are the fucking hugbox reinforcement squad at this point for it
How so? I am just stating my opinions. What's wrong with that?

[Anonymous No.6743837]

>>6743722
https://twitter.com/odd_eroaka
kisuu

I doubt the guy will get cancelled

[Anonymous No.6743838]

>>6743312
Are there any crusade campaign to dunk on these kind of AI "assisted" artist? These are no different than tracing and need to be called out

[Anonymous No.6743839]

>>6743818
>Pure artists are just fighting an uphill battle.
They werefighting an uphill battle when everything went digital

[Anonymous No.6743840]

>>6743205
Adapt by ruthlessly bullying ai fags until they have ptsd

[Anonymous No.6743841]

>>6743830
you say this as you niggas shill about near 24/7 going "you should use it too" or being an adapt or die nigga
>that and y'all niggas are far too deep in the roko's basilisk Koolaid

[Anonymous No.6743843]

>>6743841
I don't understand what you are saying. Please speak English and lay off the Twitter.

[Anonymous No.6743846]

>>6743836
>what's wrong with this being the 8th thread
The rest of your shitty chatGPT text can be discarded

[Anonymous No.6743851]

>>6743846
I'm pretty sure there are more than 8 threads and even more generals going around about the same art topics you usually talk about. AI is a new frontier and always has new and interesting things to talk about so I don't see the problem here.

[Anonymous No.6743853]

>>6743843
I could say the same for y'all AIfags for making a thread about it then
>>>6741894
>or are we ignoring the "AI" threads we're spamming

[Anonymous No.6743854]

>>6743182
>literally got an ass on her stomach
>his fans see nothing wrong with this

[Anonymous No.6743858]

>>6743814
Future is going to be "tough as fuck" no matter how many hours you twaddle with stable diffusion and chatgpt. No one is going to pay for your housing, food, and healthcare while machines do everything. People will lose their minds from having no purpose other than to exist and waste time. Embracing ai is embracing your own extinction.

[Anonymous No.6743859]

>>6743851
>I'm sure then you could go on /g/ for AI "discussions"

[Anonymous No.6743866]

>>6743817
>It's anything within the bounds of interpolation between images in the training data.
To...create a new thing. This is the same process you use to study and reference anon, it's so tedious.

I'm not bootlicking, I'm extremely happy that people are now able to use such an amazing tool to experiment and have fun with, and so do artists that have already adapted and dropped the sheep redditor mentality.

>cutting out present and future artists if things don't change

Cutting them? You mean not hiring? Well anon, technology does have a precedent of leaving people without jobs I'll give you that, but that's progress, someone has to take the L for the rest to win. Imagine if we had listened to those who wanted to ban the printing press.

[Anonymous No.6743867]

>>6743858
>People will lose their minds from having no purpose other than to exist and waste time.
No? Hobbies don't instantly become worthless once a machine starts doing it better. Your greed has rotted your brain.

[Anonymous No.6743868]

>>6743859
Yes. AI art is both art related and technology related. What's the problem?

[Anonymous No.6743869]

>>6743858
You're entering in schizo territory, do you wanna go there

[Anonymous No.6743873]

>>6743866
>I'm not a bootlicker
>but look what what it can do and I'm here to shill you on it
>"and so do artists that have already adapted and dropped the sheep redditor mentality."

[Anonymous No.6743875]

>>6743873
talking about something != shilling. you think every viewpoint that doesn't match yours is automatically shilling?

[Anonymous No.6743880]

>>6743858
I think in the distant future, very very distant future, only a few humans will remain, say around 50 or less. They will all be scattered around the world. The aesthetics of the future will resemble that of a factory, a really big automated factory. You would lift your head, left and right and you'll only see tubes and pipes, giant endless rusted pipes of all sizes pointing everywhere. These will make most of the new world, even if you followed them, it would lead you nowhere, there are thousands.

The few humans left were supposed to be supervising but no one really knows much of what's happening anymore. No one knows their whereabouts nor there's really anyone around to ask, from all we know, the few that remain may be in a long dream. Things keep moving somehow, the factory can expand and repair itself. As you walk around you hear different noises, the factory seems to be active at all times. The pipes are moving something. You can't tell what's going on nor what's being made but something is happening.

When you stop to look past the background noise, you perceive how devoid of sound the world actually is. You feel that, even if you decided to spend the rest of your life walking in a straight line, you might not even come across anyone, ever.

[Anonymous No.6743883]

>>6743869
says the AI shill who last time came with posts wanting to have robot girlfriends

[Anonymous No.6743884]

>>6743854
Peoplw coom, they don't care about the artwork (not to mention a lot of artists do that now in regards to the ass tummy)
For most people it is nut then post nut clarity then going on with their day.

[Anonymous No.6743885]

>>6743837
I found this on kemono. This is his opinion about his AI usage.

[Anonymous No.6743886]

>>6743880
>>6743883
typical artist FUD. artists hate the future and want humanity to die so badly. you can tell the greed has rotted their brains.

[Anonymous No.6743889]

>>6743885
Ah alright.

[Anonymous No.6743891]

>>6743885
This is pretty worthless since he's utilizing a base model of stable with copyrighted images within the training data like every other trained lora out there.

[Anonymous No.6743892]

>>6743883
>Pointing fingers in an anonymous website
I see you've made up your mind, let me get my schizo wizard hat

[Anonymous No.6743893]

>>6743891
The model isn't copyrighted, it was just trained on copyrighted images. It's up to the user if they want to generate copyrighted images or not.

[Anonymous No.6743897]

>>6743893
That's literally what I typed, it's trained with copyrighted data from the start, it makes no difference if you're adding your own work because it utilizes it all in the end. That's why his last sentence about copyright and using it for easy monetization falls hollow

[Anonymous No.6743899]

>>6743867
People who have everything handed to them and never work a day in their lives are the most spoiled, greedy and insufferable types of people. Which is everyone in fully automated space communism.

>>6743869
Nothing about that is schizo. How are people dependent on government welfare viewed by society at large? Even people who vote for them to have welfare resent them deep down. Putting 50-90% of humanity in a situation where they depend on welfare will never change this. It's more likely they will be culled out by an ai designed supervirus than it is they will ever see ubi.

[Anonymous No.6743900]

>>6743886
sure anon, but neat schizo blog you're making here are you going to continue to bitch and shill all night on the crab board

[Anonymous No.6743902]

>>6743897
>it makes no difference if you're adding your own work because it utilizes it all in the end.
Yeah, the human brain does that too. Pure artists can't avoid using copyrighted images either because they train on it passively.

[Anonymous No.6743903]

>YOU CAN'T DO THAT IT'S HECKING COPYRIGHTED
>*click*
>*save as*
lul :)

[Anonymous No.6743905]

>>6743900
It seems like you're the one that wants to shill AI here, anon. Why else would you be trying to give the thread activity?

[Anonymous No.6743906]

>>6743886
>artists are greedy
>let me use everything you made for free and mint the computer's turds as nfts
>please pay me 500 dollars

[Anonymous No.6743908]

>>6743891
Yeah i don't know if he's just ignorant or trying to make excuses. More people need to tell him tho cause his fans are just slurping whatever he makes without question.

[Anonymous No.6743909]

>>6743906
Those are grifters. True AIchads just gen art for the people for free; and they do it because it contributes to humanity.

[Anonymous No.6743910]

>>6743905
well anon I'm just here to reach bump limit

[Anonymous No.6743911]

>>6743909
There are no true ai Chads because trannies can't be chads

[Anonymous No.6743913]

>>6743910
That sounds like a futile effort. Once it reaches the bump limit, somebody is just going to make another AI thread because the AI art world always has something to talk about.

[Anonymous No.6743917]

>>6743902
That literally has nothing to do with the conversation and the original post of the comment . We're talking about the ignorance of the person posting that within a trained lora. Regardless, artists have the ability to choose to incorporate or disregard whatever they take in on the fly. We have passive "learning" for a reason as well which further differentiates the idea of LLM's since everything from the start to the future is decided by tweaking the weights and training data. I don't really know what you're trying to prove when they're different things.

[Anonymous No.6743918]

>>6743909
ah yes anon we must near triple the amount of porn available by next year. Hopefully soon we can get it to needing exponents to calculate it

[Anonymous No.6743925]

>>6743913
By that do you mean (you) and AIfa/g/s want to talk about it

[Anonymous No.6743926]

>>6743917
>LLM's since everything from the start to the future is decided by tweaking the weights and training data
No. You can also tweak image generation parameters and influence what images you want to generate through adding additional starting noise or mixing other models/loras on the fly. Using a copyrighted model also doesn't mean you'll exclusively produce copyrighted content.
If you use that model to produce an entirely black image, are you all of a sudden guilty of copyright infringement?

[Anonymous No.6743931]

>>6743925
AI art is of interest to many types of creators that don't just exclusively work on drawings. It seems that pure artists are just the ones who are adamantly against AI art.

[Anonymous No.6743934]

>>6743866
>To...create a new thing. This is the same process you use to study and reference anon, it's so tedious.
I don't know where you get this idea that it's the same, even on the surface the actual learning process of an artist using reference is so much more difficult and different from a model that runs through simulations of data within it's harddrive before it doesn't need it anymore. Not to mention most LLM experts have put out that they're vastly different. Even if we dispel that notion of disputes, you're somehow saying we have enough data about learning and how the brain fully functions to know how to apply that to an LLM? We'd have actual AI at that point, not this right? We don't anthropomorphize code/machinery and assign human rights of authorship to it because it doesn't learn like a human. I genuinely don't know why you're saying it's tedious when you're spouting this kind of crap and whining about it.

>I'm not bootlicking, I'm extremely happy that people are now able to use such an amazing tool to experiment and have fun with, and so do artists that have already adapted and dropped the sheep redditor mentality.
Anyone with drawing skills can adapt and choose to use ai in the future if it really is necessary. There's something called idk morals? Most people here are choosing to not use it because it's straight up fed from the works of artists without consent, and it's a big enough sticking point to them to not want to use it. I know you don't care about art, you don't see it as anything more than a product to automate and it's really clear but there is more to it than just this dumb catchphrase of "sheep redditor mentality" maybe try to look at it from multiple viewpoints first.

[Anonymous No.6743940]

>>6743931
>AI art is of interest to many types of creators that don't just exclusively work on drawings
There were already plenty of other ways to make art without drawing.

[Anonymous No.6743942]

>>6743931
neat
>proceeds to have dozens of adapt or die posts in this thread
>"many types of creators are interested"
>near all the ones here are fa/g/s

[Anonymous No.6743944]

>>6743926
Are you actually reading what was said. We're not talking about fucking legality of copyright here, it's the moral issue that he's spouting which is hypocritical because he doesn't realize the copyrighted images have been used to train the base model in the first place.

Not to mention, this copyright issue hasn't even been solved in regards to training data. Nothing regarding what you said is false, but that doesn't mean there haven't been instances where models have outputted almost identical images to the training data. At that point, probably grounds for copyright infringement similar to the andy warhol case.

[Anonymous No.6743945]

.

[Anonymous No.6743946]

>>6743866
>sheep redditor mentality
Ai faggots are literally the sheep. "You must follow the technology herd and never voice any misgivings"

[Anonymous No.6743948]

>>6743945
..

[Anonymous No.6743950]

>>6743944
>andy warhol case
I don't see how that's relevant. A model and a piece of art are two entirely different things.
One is just a vehicle for producing art and one is actual art.

[Anonymous No.6743953]

>>6743948
...

[Anonymous No.6743955]

>>6743945
....

[Anonymous No.6743957]

>>6743953
>>6743948
>>6743945
>>6743955
>buckbroken 'artist' already trying to manually bump the thread to the bump limit
LMAO!

[Anonymous No.6743958]

>>6743950
Why do you keep speed reading, I said if there are images outputted that are closely identical to the original training data images, it could be liable for copyright infringement based on the output. We're talking about the training data within the model, not the actual model itself.

[Anonymous No.6743959]

>>6743926
This is all just semantics dancing around the fact that ai can't work without other people's data. No one would have argued that people should be able to develop software with other people's data before ai came out and this is just desperate ai shilling

[Anonymous No.6743963]

...

[Anonymous No.6743965]

>>6743958
>there are images outputted that are closely identical to the original training data images
You could also do this with models that aren't trained with copyright images. If you start with the right amount of noise, you can generate any type of copyrighted imagery you want to. Doesn't mean the model itself is at fault.
The fact that you can draw Mickey Mouse with a pencil doesn't mean the pencil is copyright infringing either.

[Anonymous No.6743967]

...
......
...
....................................
......................................................
....................................
...
......
...

[Anonymous No.6743969]

>>6743934
>I know you don't care about art, you don't see it as anything more than a product to automate
You're absolutely wrong and again this is your mentality, you're the one who refuses to give people a new tool to make art. You only care about your ego and art as a business, not about the process of making art itself (which is never in any way being attacked btw)

Also copyright? LMAO when did artists care about copyright when a shit ton of them started doing fan art for a living which technically goes against copyright as much as AI does (in your head, because it really doesn't)

You know, copyright doesn't even mean what you think it means, most companies are copying and learning from each others products to develope a competition. When the final product is different you don't have any sort of copyright, this is the same with AI.

You can copyright your own fucking work, I will not use it, but I can generate my own training a machine, I can learn from your product. That's exactly what happens and there's nothing wrong with it.

Just fuck off already with this "Muh I care about art!" you don't, people like me who want it to be widespread and in a new form actually care about it, artists that embrace and use it to reach new heights care about it. Not double faced people.

[Anonymous No.6743972]

>>6743959
>ai can't work without other people's data.
Most artists can't do that either. How did you learn how to make art?
>No one would have argued that people should be able to develop software with other people's data before ai came out
Literally the entire FOSS community argued this. Copyright is designed to protect corporations, not people.

[Anonymous No.6743973]

>>6743957
Well anon your shill threads aren't gonna kill themselves

[Anonymous No.6743974]

...?

[Anonymous No.6743976]

..
....
..

[Anonymous No.6743977]

>>6743973
You're halfway there, anon. Just 150 more posts to go!

[Anonymous No.6743978]

sneed

[Anonymous No.6743979]

>>6743977
Sure anon keep giving me (you)s as well

[Anonymous No.6743981]

>>6743978
is this real?

[Anonymous No.6743982]

>>6743965
What are you talking about, genuinely what does this hypothetical have to do with this. Nowhere in the andy warhol case are we talking about the medium, we're talking about the potential output and how if the training data used was almost identical it would be grounds for the same type of situation as the warhol case.

[Anonymous No.6743983]

>>6743969
What I'm most excited about AI art is how it will help independent VN developers who could only dream of making a game.

This will breach into a shit ton of new experiences, and subhumans want to cancel it. Keep dreaming faggots you're fighting for a lost cause, you're fucking evil.

[Anonymous No.6743984]

>>6743978
neat

[Anonymous No.6743985]

>>6743978
holy shit....

[Anonymous No.6743986]

>>6743981
It's an edit

[Anonymous No.6743987]

>>6743986
it's real. i saw it

[Anonymous No.6743989]

...

[Anonymous No.6743991]

>>6743969
>give people a new tool to make art.
You have either never used ai or never made art

[Anonymous No.6743993]

>>6743987
Well of course the dancing animal is real but clearly they could never afford those background actors

[Anonymous No.6743994]

....
. .
. .
....

[Anonymous No.6743996]

>>6743978
>>6743981
>>6743984
>>6743985
>>6743986
>>6743987
>>6743993
I regret to inform you all that it's fake.

[Anonymous No.6743997]

>>6743972
Your argument falls apart because brains are not computers. Only fedora wearing virgins who put "atheist" in their bios believe this shit. Copyright has been corrupted by corporations sure but you fags just want to steal and never get called on it.

[Anonymous No.6743999]

>>6743982
>we're talking about the potential output
That's what I'm talking about as well. The potential output for a model is literally infinite, but the use case is just what the model is designed to produce. Most models are pretty generic, and aren't exclusively used to generate copyrighted imagery. The people who use models aren't being told to generate copyrighted imagery either.
>it would be grounds for the same type of situation as the warhol case.
And that's what I'm trying to argue against. How would it be similar? The andy warhol case isn't about AI models and there's only a really vague forced relation between the two because the case is just being massively over-hyped.
AI models are so alien to the current legal system, it's probably fruitless to debate about this until a relevant AI case is conclusively finished.

[Anonymous No.6744002]

>>6743969
> you're the one who refuses to give people a new tool to make art. You only care about your ego and art as a business, not about the process of making art itself (which is never in any way being attacked btw)
People could make art in anyway shape or form even without ai. it's the same kettle calling the pot black you couldn't care less about art because the people who actually produce it aren't willing to give consent to their art being used as training data. If you really cared about the process you'd be okay with that, and realize art is anything you make it to be it doesn't have to be ai scraped from existing art. So stfu with your lack of work ethic when you see it as a tool that people will use to automate for their businesses in the opposite way. Like jesus the irony here.

> LMAO when did artists care about copyright when a shit ton of them started doing fan art for a living
You act like fan art doesn't work as a two way street between the IP's and the fans. Are you this regarded to realize that fanart can still exist because most companies realize it's a net positive?

>I will not use it, but I can generate my own training a machine, I can learn from your product.
What. You won't use it, but you'll still use it for training data? Wat like come on dude wtf are you spouting now

>Just fuck off already with this "Muh I care about art!" you don't, people like me who want it to be widespread and in a new form actually care about it, artists that embrace and use it to reach new heights care about it. Not double faced people.
Yeah I care about art, so much so that i'll lie to people about using ai to automate the process and make quicker bucks out of it. Who cares if im using a model ripping off other's art and using it to compete against each other. Who cares about other people and their actual works of art and creation. I'm gonna reach new heights since im not double faced! Retard, the person behind the art is just as important as the piece

[Anonymous No.6744004]

>>6743997
>Your argument falls apart because brains are not computers.
Proof? How do you know this?
>you fags just want to steal and never get called on it.
Stealing? Nobody is taking your art away from you. New art is merely being generated.

[Anonymous No.6744005]

.™

[Anonymous No.6744010]

>>6744004
how many generations had a fucking stockphoto watermark or signature "magicly appear" anon

[Anonymous No.6744011]

!

[Anonymous No.6744012]

>>6743983
Automating sacred parts of the human experience is one of the most evil things bugmen are trying to do. You are mad because you want to experience your whole life through a screen and some people pointed out that this might not be a good thing lmao

[Anonymous No.6744013]

>>6744004
>Stealing? Nobody is taking your art away from you. New art is merely being generated.
Scrape the entirety of the web, including copyrighted works and images from artists and create a model to generate work based on that without consent and introduce it into the world for people to compete against the original without repercussion.

I get that you have this shtick about new stuff being generated, but without the actual training data of quality stolen and used, there's no new images. Stop acting like there's nothing wrong with that, when in reality you get a subpar dogshit model if you try to use only licensed and public domain images that no one would use

[Anonymous No.6744016]

>>6744011

[Anonymous No.6744017]

>>6743999
The breaking of fair use portion is the part that makes most sense in the hypothetical scenario of an image outputted closely related to the original copyrighted training data. Especially when the models are selling subscriptions like midjourney. I dont see how you'd get away with that when they're competing directly with each other

[Anonymous No.6744020]

>>6744013
>but without the actual training data of quality stolen and used, there's no new images.
And that's perfectly fine. Artists who only do it as a hobby can continue making art as they always have. AI art will only threaten the soulless producers who only make mindless slop for profit.
Both AI and pure art will benefit from each other.

[Anonymous No.6744021]

>>6744020
No you dumbass it's still stealing. That was the whole point of your argument don't backtrack and go with the whole it'll benefit artist when it clearly hasn't and we've seen companies lay off their industry level artists for AI

[Anonymous No.6744022]

(’-’ )

[Anonymous No.6744026]

( ‘-‘)

[Anonymous No.6744028]

>>6744021
>we've seen companies lay off their industry level artists for AI
And that's a good thing. Companies are greedy and will lay off their employees for the slightest bit of profit.
Artists should realize that the entire economic system is out to get them, so they should adapt instead of dying trying to fight a futile war against human progress.
Maybe in the future, artists will start enjoying art for the sake of art itself; rather than merely making art for the money.

[Anonymous No.6744030]

Ai fags are clinging so hard to training copyright data is not illegal because that's the only hope they have left. Just a reminder to all aifag that the public opinion about your slop machine is rapidly going against you. You have pissed off so many people in so many sector that it's only the matter of time for the law to heavily regulate your ass.
The way the machine eat billions of copyright data will never have the same right ad a human learning experience no matter how much you parasite cry about it.

[Anonymous No.6744031]

............................( _")

[Anonymous No.6744032]

>>6744030
AI will adapt. It will be forced to adapt and become stronger than before.
Your meaningless actions will only strengthen the hydra.

[Anonymous No.6744033]

>>6743996
nah its real

[Anonymous No.6744034]

>>6744032
What makes you think there won't be AIs to fight against AIs

[Anonymous No.6744036]

>>6744032
Really proving the below to be true nigga
>>6743841
wouldn't surprise me if you were to esl that you use chatGPT to write your stuff for you

[Anonymous No.6744039]

>>6744032
sneed will adapt

[Anonymous No.6744040]

.....................................................( _")

[Anonymous No.6744042]

>>6744028
>Maybe in the future, artists will start enjoying art for the sake of art itself; rather than merely making art for the money.
Maybe you're just so desensitized but visual arts is all around you and worth valuing, because it's worth that much. I don't know how sheltered or what trust funds your parents set up for you to think like this, but most people learn skills and utilize them if they can to make a living so they can continue to do waht they love to do. I've seen this point a number of times today and I gotta wonder why this particular set of ai sisters are so hung up on relinquishing any sort of money making capabilitity from artists when we live in a capitalistic society. Are you just that pathetic and jealous because you failed your creative endeavors and wish the same onto others? Or are you that out of touch with society to not realize making money from your art when it has value is just normal? Like seriously what kind of delusion are you living in.

Also props to you for that bit about companies, when you're actively bootlicking them for using their products. The irony is off the charts spewing hypocrisy every step of the way

[Anonymous No.6744043]

.................................................................('_' )

[Anonymous No.6744044]

.!.

[Anonymous No.6744046]

>>6744042
That sounds like a society problem rather than an AI problem. Maybe artists should try revolting if some random software has the ability to threaten their livelihoods this much.

[Sage KYS OP No.6744048]

>>6744032
Why do you talk like an anime character, faggot?

[Anonymous No.6744049]

.................................................................(‘‘- √)

[Anonymous No.6744050]

>>6744034
That's the irony here. Ai is going to disenfranchise large portions of the population and will never open new doors. This will create hordes of people who have nothing to do but fight for regulation of ai and design software to protect against ai. All those "new jobs" that automation supposedly creates will look like this and people who want unregulated ai will seethe eternally about it. Need I mention all the fake DEI jobs that also tie into regulating ai. Before you argue against this remember that you can't automate a job that was already bullshit in the first place.

[Anonymous No.6744053]

desu

[Anonymous No.6744055]

>>6744046
I was joking about the sheltered or out of touch trust fund jokes but I might have hit the head for once.

[Anonymous No.6744057]

desu ne

[Anonymous No.6744059]

( :y) .............................(•~•)

[Anonymous No.6744060]

>>6744055
Artists are the ones out of touch here. Making more laws limiting AI art won't do a thing. You simply can't stop information from spreading across the internet once you release it. The models will freely exist on any individual's hard drive and people will continue generating and distributing art for free.
Prepare for the worst case scenario. The world is changing fast, whether by cruel, unrelenting mother nature, or the stalwart progress of technology.

[Anonymous No.6744063]

>>6744060
Artists are the ones out of touch here. Making more laws limiting AI art won't do a thing. You simply can't stop information from spreading across the internet once you release it. The models will freely exist on any individual's hard drive and people will continue generating and distributing art for free.
Prepare for the worst case scenario. The world is changing fast, whether by cruel, unrelenting mother nature, or the stalwart progress of technology.

[Anonymous No.6744064]

>>6744060
Will your hdd survive a nuke going off a few kilometers from where you live?

[Anonymous No.6744065]

my hdd will survive 2 nukes

[Anonymous No.6744066]

>>6744060
>>6744063
why are you the one samefagging here anon

[Anonymous No.6744068]

>>6744060
I don’t disagree with you but it’s not like siting back and letting the course of things play out with no regulation or recourse is the play. Regardless most of the artists here will find a way to adapt in the future as well

[Anonymous No.6744069]

Is it over for japan? Be honest

[Anonymous No.6744072]

>>6744066
That's just the bump limit schizo replying to my post for no reason. He HATES AI threads, so he's working very hard.

[Anonymous No.6744074]

>>6744072
Why are you trying to make 90 fucking threads in a month anon

[Anonymous No.6744075]

>>6744069
I hope so. Japan is the original soiboy nation.

[Anonymous No.6744076]

>>6744012
?? Take your meds
Automation is what made the world we live today

[Anonymous No.6744077]

>>>6744066
>That's just the bump limit schizo replying to my post for no reason. He HATES AI threads, so he's working very hard.

[Anonymous No.6744078]

>>6744068
>Regardless most of the artists here will find a way to adapt in the future as well
That's how it's always been. Regardless of what side you are on, you are merely just a peon working under the powers that be.
Unless you're part of the oligarchy, your best play has always been to just live your life as best you can.

[Anonymous No.6744081]

>>6744078
This. This is why I need a motorcycle. An ADV bike that can take me anywhere. No corpo will be able to stop me. And if I die? Great. I'll have great fun on the bike until I die of natural causes or in a crash. Win win.

[Anonymous No.6744082]

fake

[Anonymous No.6744083]

>>6744076
Yes anon and in some places like china they even have built in suicide nets if your overstressed

[Anonymous No.6744084]

>>6744074
What threads? I don't make any threads.
I just post and contribute meaningful discussions to interesting threads I come across.

[Anonymous No.6744085]

>>6744077
thanks for the free (you)

[Anonymous No.6744087]

>>6744012
>Automating sacred parts of the human experience is one of the most evil things bugmen are trying to do
You can't automate making art for fun. It's just the moneymaking part that is being automated.

[Anonymous No.6744088]

>>6744060
> I will keep filming and fucking children and no law have ever been able to stoop me
True fellow subhuman

[Anonymous No.6744089]

>>6744084
and near every thread that happens to be an AI thread that magically appears almost 8 times in one day

[Anonymous No.6744090]

>>6744088
>brings up some absolutely insane and schizophrenic scenario that nobody implied or mentioned
take your meds

[Anonymous No.6744092]

>>6744089
"surely" mf talks like the nerd emoji

[Anonymous No.6744093]

..

[Anonymous No.6744094]

>>6744089
There's no magic about it. People want to talk about AI art because it's the most interesting art form. Nothing weird about it.

[Anonymous No.6744095]

...

[Anonymous No.6744098]

...

[Anonymous No.6744099]

>>6744094
yes my nigga. Nothing weird or note worthy on summing the headpat squad
>>>6741894
absolutely nothing at all

[Anonymous No.6744100]

how does he float

[Anonymous No.6744101]

>>6744099
You should show this to >>6744098.
It seems like he is wasting his time because AI art threads are just this popular; and the attempts to force the bump limit on AI threads are sisyphean.
Their popularity should not concern you though. You can simply make more of other art threads and post in them as well. With imageboards, you have lots of options for the content you choose to participate in.

[Anonymous No.6744103]

(•-•)√

[Anonymous No.6744104]

[Anonymous No.6744105]

sneed thread

[Anonymous No.6744106]

sneed bread

[Anonymous No.6744108]

>>6744101
>spamming and flooding is nothing to be concerned about or dealt with
>you also /g/ to go to as well if you wanted to actually "discuss" AI

[Anonymous No.6744109]

sneed head

[Anonymous No.6744110]

>>6744108
I don't see any spamming or flooding. I just see people posting in art-related threads.
This board moves at a slow pace compared to the other boards. How could there be spamming involved?

[Anonymous No.6744111]

.

[Anonymous No.6744114]

i will play chess with a pigeon

[Anonymous No.6744117]

>>6744110
>making 8 AI threads on a slow board in less then a day is not spamming or flooding he says
also another (you)

[Anonymous No.6744118]

another (poo)

[Anonymous No.6744121]

.....

[Anonymous No.6744122]

>>6744117
AI art threads are also art threads; and art threads belong on an art imageboard. What's the problem here?
It seems like you should be more concerned with the mindless spammers around you than people participating in productive AI art discussions.

[Anonymous No.6744124]

AI art threads are also fart threads;

[Anonymous No.6744127]

>>6744122
For an ai art thread, there seems to never be any actual ai art up for discussion or critique. Wonder why

[Anonymous No.6744129]

for an ai fart thread,

[Anonymous No.6744131]

>>6744127
There are a few, but AI artists realize that this environment is hostile to their presence; so they are rare. Eventually, as AI art becomes more commonplace, you'll start to see more and more AI art up for critique and discussion.
The future might be closer than you think as well. It's up to the open-minded artists of /ic/ to continue contributing to productive AI discussions and welcoming budding AI artists to the hobby.

[Anonymous No.6744132]

>>6744122
Well anon your on the crab board and on the crab floor, and I judge this thread to get fucked.

[Anonymous No.6744134]

>>6743162
>shota on milf
Kill yourself

[Anonymous No.6744135]

.

[Anonymous No.6744136]

..

[Anonymous No.6744139]

...

[Anonymous No.6744140]

>>6744131
I don't think that's gonna happen anytime soon. Especially when most of the average prompters can't even fix the mistakes themselves

[Anonymous No.6744141]

....

[Anonymous No.6744142]

>>6744140
They'll learn, just as all artists do; and this is the best place for them to learn. Please help out the community by guiding them well, anon.

[Anonymous No.6744143]

.....

[Anonymous No.6744144]

......

[Anonymous No.6744150]

........

[Anonymous No.6744151]

..........

[Anonymous No.6744152]

>>6744142
I wish I could pal, can't help people who won't even pick up a pencil to edit their genned images

[Anonymous No.6744153]

...........

[Anonymous No.6744155]

I do want an AI thread but only to laugh at their failure. Every time misfortune comes to AI fags, my day get brighter!

[Anonymous No.6744156]

>>6744142
Well anon here's some motivational music to get them on their way
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=tMDhztCAsKs&pp=ygUQRWF0IHNoaXQgYW5kIGRpZQ%3D%3D

[Anonymous No.6744158]

.............

[Anonymous No.6744159]

>>6744155
it would end up in our pajeets shitting up the thread defending their honor anyways

[Anonymous No.6744161]

.........

[Anonymous No.6744162]

>>6744155
Gotta be honest, all I've seen has been loss after loss whether it's sites banning it, or legal issues encroaching. I remember a few months back when they would argue that the training data used isn't copyrighted, and even in the latest hearing the rep from stability even says it himself that they do use copyrighted data without compensation.

[Anonymous No.6744163]

.......
...
.......

[Anonymous No.6744164]

!

[Anonymous No.6744165]

!!

[Anonymous No.6744167]

>>6744165
!!!

[Anonymous No.6744169]

>>6744167
!!!!

[Anonymous No.6744171]

>>6744169
!!!!!

[Anonymous No.6744173]

!!!!!

[Anonymous No.6744175]

>>6744173
>>6744171
!!!!!!

[Anonymous No.6744176]

>>6744173
!!‽!!

[Anonymous No.6744177]

>>6744176
explain

[Anonymous No.6744178]

?

[Anonymous No.6744181]

??

[Anonymous No.6744182]

???

[Anonymous No.6744183]

>>6744177
Phone/if you could also use Google search you could Ctrl c and z if you don't have the characters for your keyboard. Same for other languages characters that are not found on most keyboards

[Anonymous No.6744187]

‽‽‽‽

[Anonymous No.6744188]

>>6744182
‽‽‽

[Anonymous No.6744191]

>>6744188
‽‽

[Anonymous No.6744192]

‽‽‽‽‽‽

[Anonymous No.6744195]

>>6744192
.!‽‽¿¿??‽‽!.

[Anonymous No.6744198]

† Le Regis Crist †

[Anonymous No.6744200]

.

[Anonymous No.6744203]

•‡¥‡•

[Anonymous No.6744205]

..

[Anonymous No.6744206]

wtf

[Anonymous No.6744207]

( Π÷Π )

[Anonymous No.6744210]

based thread shitters

[Anonymous No.6744212]

the fabled not an emoji character

[Anonymous No.6744215]

well that one didn't work «№»

[Anonymous No.6744217]

Kaomoji chads... ପ(๑•ᴗ•๑)ଓ

[Anonymous No.6744219]

.

[Anonymous No.6744220]

opa |、
(˚ˎ 。7
|、˜〵
じしˍ,)ノ

[Anonymous No.6744222]

"૮( •⤙•˶

[Anonymous No.6744280]

.

[Anonymous No.6744314]

>>6743162
AI is a tool but so malware.

[Anonymous No.6744353]

What the hell is going on?

[Anonymous No.6744357]

>>6744076
>trannyism and hrt for 10 year olds is the world we live in. Take your meds! Can't stop progress!

[Anonymous No.6744363]

>>6744131
>welcome budding phone app twaddlers to the art community
Lol artists will only become more hostile the more their communities are invaded by worthless retards who want to show off t>>6744131
housands of the computers turds and try to charge money for them

[Anonymous No.6744365]

>>6743162
It's good for amatuers and indies, it's bad for carrier corporates.

[Anonymous No.6744405]

>>6744134
You tap to femboy porn sit down

[Anonymous No.6744867]

left I drew as pre beg, put it into control net and got right

[Anonymous No.6745037]

>>6743205
Imagine. It's been 6 months and you technerds still haven't changed your rethoric in spite of being bullied into submission by reason, logic and evidence time and time again. You still keep pretending you have the upper hand. You're low iq. You're morons. Consumers with the inability to reflect and think critically. You're followers. Every single one of you stupid idiots.
And no it doesn't fucking democratise art; it monopolises it if anything. Big corporations making money of off artists hard work while making their work lose value in the process. We've all seen the result of this and it's only just begun.
You guys are and will forever be the zombified, cattlebrained, easily influenced consumershenchmen that these multi billion corporations rely on to spread their own talkingpoints. And you're doing a great job of it. Just don't expect to be respected for it. You are shit underneath my shoe. Soulless fucking parasite.

[Anonymous No.6745045]

>>6743546
As if you know anything about "real artists". A lot of artists working professionally in the industry have been vehemently against this kind of usery for a long time now. Fuck off with your disingenuos arguments nerd.

[Anonymous No.6745051]

>>6744363
It's so disrespectful that I can barely comprehend it. If I put myself in their shoes I still wouldn't do it. If I were someone who didn't draw I still wouldn't use this AI tech as a grift to compete against artists.
It's unethical and honestly disgusts me.
In 7 months they have made such an inhospitable, cruel place for artists that it wouldn't surprise me that many of us abandoned the idea of showing our artwork to the world.
I have been completely sidelined and I'm just patiently waiting. Hoping that something major will change and that the nerd responsible for this will be hele accountable. Fucking parasites.

[Anonymous No.6745058]

>>6745051
It's karma.

[Anonymous No.6745623]

>>6744131
>AI art up for critique and discussion
there's nothing to "critique". you didn't make it, and have no control on 99% of it. you don't know how to fix it because you don't know how to draw or paint. you are delusional.

[Anonymous No.6745874]

Art Bros, are we getting cucked by AI Chad??