Power level thread

[Anonymous No.6714849]

You know the drill. pyw, rate other's art on a scale ranging between beg/int/pro using pre/low/high qualifiers. Giving advice or opinions is an added bonus.

This is a simple exercise in critique, you don't have to be a higher tier to give your 2 cents, but be conscious of your skill level and also be understanding of styles outside your knowledge or taste. The goal after all is to learn from each other & get better at what we do.

[Anonymous No.6714859]

>>6714849
You first faggot.

[Anonymous No.6714867]

[Anonymous No.6714878]

Give it to me straight, can I make those big porn bucks?

[Anonymous No.6714889]

We are going to make it, brothers

[Anonymous No.6714894]

>>6714889
it kind of looks like she has two torsos that combine at the titty level
not trying to shit on your hard work anon, it just looked funny

[Anonymous No.6714906]

>>6714867
I love this style so much, it's very easy on the eyes and whimsical. It's hard for me to tell here but I think high/beg/
>>6714878
10/10 made me cum
For real your line quality makes me suspect you're actually mid/int/ or higher am I right on the money?
>>6714889
I'm going to say low/beg/ from this example from the perspective, anatomy and foreshortrning issues. I like your glossy highlights and shading.

[Anonymous No.6714931]

>>6714867
cute
>>6714889
fucking kill yourself, coomer scum
>>6714906
cool character design and lighting

[Anonymous No.6715015]

>>6714931
This is cool as fuck! is it Witcher fanart?

[Anonymous No.6715022]

[Anonymous No.6715031]

[Anonymous No.6715053]

[Anonymous No.6715079]

>>6715015
thanks, anon! it isn't fanart, I made it up

[Anonymous No.6715089]

[Anonymous No.6715097]

[Anonymous No.6715119]

[Anonymous No.6715273]

Here's some recent stuff. I'm not the best judge of gauging other people's skill level, so I'm not going to rate others because I'll probably be way off. I consider myself to be high /beg/

[Anonymous No.6715346]

>>6715089
very nice, movement even in stillness.
>>6714931
too still when there should be movement.

I don't have any stuff on me now.

[Anonymous No.6715361]

[Anonymous No.6715363]

>it's all big booba fetish art
you all suck

[Anonymous No.6715413]

>>6715097
SOVL, beg, that moon is absolutely absurd. please use a circle tool ffs

[Anonymous No.6715553]

>>6715363
Big tits rule, suck it pedo

[Anonymous No.6715581]

>>6715363
even the fox?

[Anonymous No.6715635]

>>6715363
this
total coomer death

[Anonymous No.6715684]

>>6714931
I like the idea and composition but the figures look like figurines that you posed yourself, stiff. I'd put some movement on the skeleton guy, he looks more like a prop than an imposing threat.

[Anonymous No.6715753]

>>6715053
Saved. Is this fanart for something?

[Anonymous No.6715834]

>>6715363
>big boobs
>fetish
LOL, what a retard. And none of these except for one even show the breasts and in such a mild way that it could not be called fetish art.

[Anonymous No.6715863]

Do we have an influx of newfrens here? So many posting but most are unwilling to give critique. Not that I'm complaining, just funny how these threads were the opposite just a year ago.

[Anonymous No.6715874]

>>6714849
awrite

[Anonymous No.6715920]

[Anonymous No.6715927]

[Anonymous No.6716067]

>>6715874
Very cool, can we be friends?? Do you have a blog?

[Anonymous No.6716068]

>>6715053
low/int/
>>6715089
high/int/
>>6715097
mid/beg/ please keep up with anatomy studies you're on the right track
>>6715119
low/int/ only held back by awkward hands
>>6715874
high/int/

[Anonymous No.6716089]

>>6716067
>can we be friends??
sure
>blog?
I have a NG:
thedansandoval.newgrounds.com/
Have links to Twitter and Pixiv there if you wanna follow me on those sites too
>>6716068
>high/int/
Woah, thanks.

[Anonymous No.6716122]

>>6714849
On request I made this bunny family like a month ago. They go Grandpa-Grandma-(their 2)Sons-Grandchildren
The biggest one is like 6" by 2" 1/2 and the depth of the woodcarving is 1" or less
They are made out of cedar, and applied a mixture of wax and oil as protective coat.

[Anonymous No.6716156]

>>6715753
it's a boss from Elden Ring

[Anonymous No.6716163]

>>6716122
That's incredible anon. I don't know how to rate sculptures but I'd buy it at a store.

[Anonymous No.6716166]

wip

[Anonymous No.6716272]

>>6715927
Based and amenpilled.

[Anonymous No.6716429]

>>6716163
thanks man I appreciate your comment

[Anonymous No.6716654]

[Anonymous No.6716734]

>>6715874
saved - what a cute and charming style, I'd read a comic that looked like this. pre beg I guess lmao

[Anonymous No.6716752]

[Anonymous No.6717084]

>>6716654
very nice, quite fluid and with a good grasp of anatomy!

[Anonymous No.6717090]

apparently i never finish anything but this is my most recent piece

[Anonymous No.6717092]

>>6717090
have no clue why the image turned sideways sorry about that

[Anonymous No.6717104]

>>6714849
oh perfect choice OP.
here's one I repainted not too long ago.
I still fucking hate the face, but it is what it is.

[Anonymous No.6717111]

>>6717104
high/beg/

[Anonymous No.6717133]

It's still wip but it;s my most recent piece.

[Anonymous No.6717140]

>>6717104
The face isn't the worst part, it's the abs. Your color and light skill is a whole tier above anatomy, so please work on that as well as foreshortening. Make a bunch of sketches without coloring for a while in practice. It also looks like you much prefer to draw girls which is fine but try to study male figures a bit.

[Anonymous No.6717144]

I heckin' suck. Oil painting without reference.
>>6717133
mid int
>>6717104
high beg i agree
>>6717090
i have no idea but good taste. it's too simple for me to tell, like a good/bad singer singing an easy melody. looks good tho.
>>6716752
xD idunno

[Anonymous No.6717146]

>>6715363
ok, here's some scoliosis with a vague impression of an ass stuck to it

[Anonymous No.6717200]

>>6717090
>>6717144
not sure if this will help since it’s so messy but here’s the sketch i’m working on right now

also i’d say that you’re low/int/ based on that painting

[Anonymous No.6717219]

most recent finished drawing

[Anonymous No.6717227]

>>6717219
probably mid/beg/ but it’s hard to tell

[Anonymous No.6717296]

>>6716166
hard to tell but i think low/int/

[Anonymous No.6717346]

[Anonymous No.6717354]

>>6717346
high/beg/ or low/int/

[Anonymous No.6717461]

>>6717354
def not high beg lol. hes low int approching mid int. jus needs to work on line quality and structre

[Anonymous No.6717543]

[Anonymous No.6717552]

>>6717543
idk how you made something thats supposed to be hard to read readable and the characters look really good looks high int to me

[Anonymous No.6717563]

[Anonymous No.6717611]

>>6714867
low /int/, but /beg/ if this is the best you can do
>>6714889
/beg/
>>6714906
/int/
>>6714931
/pro/ or high /int/
>>6715022
/beg/ if this is the best you can do
>>6715031
/int/
>>6715053
high /int/
>>6715089
/pro/
>>6715097
/beg/
>>6715119
/int/
>>6715273
Some of these are high /beg/ while some others are low /int/
>>6715361
/beg/ if this is the best you can do, but could be low /int/
>>6715874
/pro/, possibly high /int/
>>6715927
mid-high /int/
>>6716166
high /int/
>>6716654
high /int/ or /pro/,
>>6716752
/beg/ or very simple /int/ (it's hard to tell with the sketchier ones)
>>6717090
/beg/
>>6717104
high-ish /beg/
>>6717133
/pro/ or high /int/
>>6717144
high /beg/
>>6717146
low /int/ or high /beg/
>>6717200
/beg/
>>6717219
high-ish beg
>>6717346
slightly low /int/
>>6717543
/beg/ or very simplified /int/ (hard to tell)
>>6717563
looks like very slightly unfinished /pro/

[Anonymous No.6717697]

I can't draw bodies

[Anonymous No.6717701]

>>6717543
How to draw like this?

[Anonymous No.6717717]

I WILL NEVER USE REFERENCES FUCK YOU FOR EVEN ASKING YOU CHEATERS

[Anonymous No.6717722]

>>6717717
Based

[Anonymous No.6717723]

Most recent piece

[Anonymous No.6717808]

>>6717611
Thank you for noticing me

[Anonymous No.6717841]

>>6717717
finish your fucking drawing, sperg

[Anonymous No.6717843]

>>6717697
>can't draw bodies
add can't crop images to the list

[Anonymous No.6717860]

>>6717843
Here's the cropped version

[Anonymous No.6717980]

>>6717611
you are a /beg/

[Anonymous No.6717985]

Posted in another thread but gonna post here too. So far have been told mid beg or beg. One said low int.

[Anonymous No.6718002]

Current wip. My body is ready
>>6714889
>>6715022
>>6715097
>>6715273
>>6715361
>>6717090
>>6717146
>>6717200
>>6717219
>>6717697
>>6717717
>>6717985
/beg/. Still lacks some fundamentals required for your work to look passable/good.
>>6714867
>>6714931
>>6715031
>>6715089
>>6715119
>>6716166
>>6717104
>>6717144
>>6717611
>>6717723
Low/int/ Almost there! Passable but still visible room for improvement
>>6714906
>>6715053
>>6715874
>>6715927
>>6716122
>>6716654
>>6717133
>>6717346
>>6717543
>>6717563
high/int/ It shows that you know your stuff. The only thing to work on (if you want to) would be stylization and other secondary things.

Sorry if I missed anyone.

[Anonymous No.6718013]

>>6718002
Low /int/
When you see my art at >>6717985 what do you feel is lacking most? What screams beg? Basically asking for critique or advice here

[Anonymous No.6718021]

>>6718002
based primarina appreciator, rather inflated rankings however

[Anonymous No.6718024]

>>6718002
>>6715089 is absolutely not low/int/, probably the highest skill level in this thread but still hard to tell without seeing a completed piece.

Very nice rendering, I would put you at low/int/ but I'd like to see humanoid figures.

[Anonymous No.6718061]

>>6717701

[Anonymous No.6718078]

>>6718002
I'm the poster of>>6717860

I've just started doodling for more or less a year
Where should I start improving (fundamentals)

[Anonymous No.6718102]

[Anonymous No.6718105]

>>6717543
This is fantastic. I adore your style

[Anonymous No.6718106]

>>6718102
high/int/ cute bun

[Anonymous No.6718109]

[Anonymous No.6718119]

>>6717543
blog?

[Anonymous No.6718121]

>>6714906
Low int

>>6714889
Low int

>>6714931
Low int

>>6715022
Mid beg

>>6715031
Between Low int mid int

>>6715053
Mid to high int

>>6715089
Mid to high int

>>6715097
Cusp low int

>>6715119
Low to mid int

>>6715874
High int or pro, my favorite

>>6716156
Mid to high int I like this

>>6716166
Mid int

>>6717104
High beg, polish but make me sick

>>6717133
High int

>>6717144
Mid int
>>6717543
Mid to high int

>>6717563
Pro

>>6717723
Low int

>>6718002
Mid int

>>6718102
High int

[Anonymous No.6718124]

>>6718121
What about mine here? >>6717985
To me, yours is probably high int.

[Anonymous No.6718131]

>>6718124
Thank you!
Sorry I was skipping stuff near end lol. Hard to tell but from finished ones it looks high beg. I like middle top face

[Anonymous No.6718195]

>>6714931
this is nice

[Anonymous No.6718253]

>>6718121
>High int or pro, my favorite
awesome, your's pretty neat too!

[Anonymous No.6718276]

>>6717860
tranny artstyle

[Anonymous No.6718304]

>>6715022
high sovl

[Anonymous No.6718437]

>>6718195
thanks

[Anonymous No.6718488]

>>6718024
that is 100% low int. you can tell.

just compare this >>6716654 and this >>6715089

the first anon is clearly high /int/, while the second is maybe high /beg/ low /int/.

[Anonymous No.6718493]

>>6718121
you might of missed mine, but where would you rate me?

[Anonymous No.6718500]

>>6718276
This nigga gets it

[Anonymous No.6718661]

>>6717543
>>6717563
>>6715089
>>6718121
>>6714906
>>6715874
my favs here

>>6718078
not that guy but stop doodling, do full pieces. study study. sorry anon but there isn't a thing redeemable about the piece but that's ok, start with basics and move from there. there's a lot of anime threads here that'll help you if you if you want to draw in that style (there are also occasional art book threads with a lot of anime as well) but in order to get good at any style, you need to have understandings of anatomy (if drawing humans) and all that other studious stuff. good luck

[Anonymous No.6718728]

wip of a biiig commission im working on for a college project. since the college is ran by nigs, they said i had to draw "prominent black figures from every decade up from the 70's". i have a couple weeks to finish it.

[Anonymous No.6718782]

>>6718728
that's easy just draw the 1992 NBA dream team
fr

[Anonymous No.6718787]

>>6718493
I would say mid int, muscle breakdown of the body looks really good. I think with some hatching involved to give it shadows this would be high int.

[Anonymous No.6718897]

>>6715053
>>6718121
much thanks anon, but >>6716156 is just a screenshot from the game lol

[Anonymous No.6718993]

[Anonymous No.6719062]

[Anonymous No.6719069]

>>6718728
ears look too small

[Anonymous No.6719176]

>>6714867
>>6715874
>>6717133
>>6717723
>>6718102
Cute
>>6714906
>>6714931
>>6715031
>>6718728
Looks Nice
>>6717563
>>6714931
>>6715119
>>6715089
>>6715053
>>6718109
GOOD
>>6717146
High potential

[Anonymous No.6719185]

>>6717200
i’m just gonna put the “finished” version of this on here cause i’ve been skipped the last few times people have gone through

[Anonymous No.6719198]

>>6714878
>No ass.
How dare you.

[Anonymous No.6719253]

>>6718002
Here's the finished drawing if that helps
>>6718013
>what do you feel is lacking most?
It's hard to see how you shade/ comprehend light and shadow and also there's little to no line weight (maybe because of the pencil you used). Basically it's impossible to judge anything from this pencil sketch alone because it's too unfinished.
>>6718078
Basically what >>6718661 said

[Anonymous No.6719265]

>>6717611
>Some of these are high /beg/ while some others are low /int/
Thanks. Which ones would you say are low /int/? I don't think I'm at that level yet, so I'm curious.

>>6718002
>/beg/. Still lacks some fundamentals required for your work to look passable/good.
Thanks. On top of my lacking fundamentals, I still struggle a lot with faces as well. What bothers me is that faces are the things I've practiced more than anything else, by a landslide, but they still continue to be the weakest parts of my drawings.

[Anonymous No.6719275]

>>6719069
nah thats literally the size of the ears on the reference

[Anonymous No.6719347]

>>6719253
>It's hard to see how you shade/ comprehend light and shadow and also there's little to no line weight (maybe because of the pencil you used).
I can see what you mean. I struggle with line weight a bit, but I do think it might be because of the tools I use. I've been told before that the tools I use are too limited and that I need to use more.
I don't think I shaded much in that piece, but it's also a complaint I've gotten before and I know how light I can be with my shading at times.
>Basically it's impossible to judge anything from this pencil sketch alone because it's too unfinished.
I'll take the advice here >>6718661 you showed the other anon because it sounds like a similar issue. Thanks so much

[Anonymous No.6719431]

>>6719062
cool af

[Anonymous No.6719529]

>>6719265
>Thanks. Which ones would you say are low /int/? I don't think I'm at that level yet, so I'm curious.

IMO, the black and white ones look a bit better than the colored pics. But I can't really help you with that, because I'm not too good with coloring and shading

[Anonymous No.6719561]

My best drawings from the past couple months

[Anonymous No.6719771]

[Anonymous No.6719773]

pics is of project ive been doing and redoing for a while

>>6719561
Low/int/
>>6717543
high /int/
>>6717346
high /int/
>>6716752
high /int/

[Anonymous No.6719890]

>>6714867
>>6715022
>>6717090
>>6717146
>>6717200
>>6717717
beg

>>6714889
>>6714906
>>6715097
>>6717219
>>6717543
>>6717611
>>6719176
>>6719771
>>6719773
high beg

>>6715119
>>6717144
>>6717346
>>6718002
>>6718102
>>6718121
>>6718728
>>6719561
low int

>>6714931
>>6715031
>>6715053
>>6715089
>>6715874
>>6715927
>>6717133
>>6717563
>>6719062
int

[Anonymous No.6719907]

>mine keeps getting ignored
Mine must be either really bad or painfully mediocre

[Anonymous No.6719949]

>>6719907
Which one yours?

This? >>6718993
If so its not bad it's just sketchy and too unfinished to tell. Could be anywhere from mid beg to mid int depending on how you finish it

[Anonymous No.6720036]

You have someone that loves you

[Anonymous No.6720050]

>>6718993
>pine
mid int

[Anonymous No.6720051]

this took longer than it should because i tend to overwork it. i'd like my paintings to look more painterly and take less time but i don't know how to do it

[Anonymous No.6720055]

my latest commission drawing......

>>6714867
>>6714878
>>6715022
/beg/


>>6717543
Mid /int/, maybe higher If I see more stuff from you cuz I really like this!

>>6717563
Easily high /int/, nice

>>6717611
high /beg/ to low /int/

>>6717723
low /int/

>>6718102
high /beg/

>>6718121
I remember seeing your stuff before, mid /int/ sounds about right

>>6718493
mid /int/

>>6718728
mid /int/

>>6718993
mid /int/

>>6719062
High /int/, I really like this

[Anonymous No.6720056]

i finished joe frazier! (bottom right corner). any crits before i move on?

[Anonymous No.6720057]

>>6720055
high beg

[Anonymous No.6720066]

>>6720057
higher than I expected, thank you!

[Anonymous No.6720183]

>>6719561
Int, loving the perspective stuff
>>6719771
Mid-high int, digging the vibrant complimenting colors.
>>6719773
High beg, the detail is nice. You're riiiight on the edge of int imo.
>>6720056
Mid-high int, maybe add some subtle highlights to accentuate the musculature

[Anonymous No.6720240]

>>6720183
do you really think that >>6719771 and >>6720056 are even remotely on the same level?

[Anonymous No.6720247]

>>6720055
Your shading skill is like 9000 and then everything else looks retarded

intentional?

[Anonymous No.6720249]

>>6720240
you're right
one is soulless monke and the other isn't

[Anonymous No.6720250]

>>6720240
NTA but it's easy to think that cartoons are "easier" than realism but to make them actually appealing it takes a specific skill set you have to train for. If a realism only artist tries to make a cartoon they'll most likely run into difficulty just as a cartoonist only would have trouble with realism.

[Anonymous No.6720251]

LITERALLY ME

any crits?

[Anonymous No.6720252]

>>6720251
Needs highlights and more rendering but I think you knew that.

[Anonymous No.6720267]

>>6720240
>he can't see the beauty in anything but realism and thinks cartoons are easy
Hardcore NGMI

[Anonymous No.6720295]

>>6720267
i can, but its just absurd to think those two pieces are on the same level of skill. if i were to rate them, i'd put >>6719771 at low-mid beg, and >>6720056 at high int

[Anonymous No.6720324]

>>6720295
Nta but I agree. I was kind of surprised how high a rating that got.

>>6720055
Also this rating the bunny cactus girl as high beg. That drawing is an easy int.

[Anonymous No.6720337]

>>6720324
Now that I look at it, I guess you're right. I'd put it on low \int\

[Anonymous No.6720339]

>>6720247
What do you think looks retarded? as far as I can see shading is most of this drawing

[Anonymous No.6720342]

>>6717543
high /int/ or low pro masquerading as /beg/

[Anonymous No.6720344]

>>6720250
infamous case in point

[Anonymous No.6720382]

>>6720295
>low beg
Objectively untrue. Just say you hate cartoons.

[Anonymous No.6720388]

>>6720344
This is exactly what I was thinking about. Who drew this again?

[Anonymous No.6720410]

>>6720388
proko

[Anonymous No.6720470]

>>6720382
its true. cartoon or not, it still looks low-mid beg. and its not even a good looking cartoon. the line weight is shit.

[Anonymous No.6720518]

>>6720344
Jesus effing Christ. I knew I didn't dream this shit. Thanks, went nuts looking for this.

[Anonymous No.6720548]

>>6714894
I can't unsee it

[Anonymous No.6720610]

WIPs of some characters

[Anonymous No.6720622]

>>6720610
High beg - your observation skills are alright but there's still quite a few things that look too off for you to be int, plus it's hard to rate your work accurately with just unfinished stuff.

[Anonymous No.6720629]

>>6720622
I'll be coming back to the thread (or another like it) when these are done. Been focusing on getting my fundamentals down so I don't have a lot of "finished" stuff only sketches.

Pic is an older piece i consider finished but deff beg level. I find myself doing a lot but not "getting" a whole ton about anatomy, lighting, shapes etc.

[Anonymous No.6720677]

>>6720610
Hi, it call my attention that reference photo you've found there, it is awesome. But that photo also solves so many things for you, (even in the clothes design) and you are not taking advantage of it. I see you're adding so many details and complexity in the whole design wich doesn't help you.
Also you have the OC reference there an it is quite nimble, like a plant. You should add that to your version. I mean, the reference photo doesn't have to dictate exactly how your style and composition should be, give her nimble and legs like in the original art.

[Anonymous No.6720769]

>>6720677
Thanks for the crit! Started to change some things that you talked about (body, limbs) and I'll go through everything again. I have a tendency to overcomplicate things and that clearly goes for my art aswell.

[Anonymous No.6720798]

>>6714849
I did this smol comic in the rough. Just learned that the kneeled eraser can be rolled onto the paper to lift graphite so I feel pretty dumb.

[Anonymous No.6720823]

Crits?

[Anonymous No.6720950]

I wonder if this guy still lurks this shithole

[Anonymous No.6721435]

Wish my stuff wasn't so flat on digital.

everyone here is an Int or whatever the one that means good is.

[Anonymous No.6721451]

>>6720950
Woah.

[Anonymous No.6721457]

Here's the last thing I spent a lot of time on

[Anonymous No.6721583]

>>6720823
argh

this is the crit

[Anonymous No.6721630]

>>6721435
her right eye looks a bit off but the colors are mad nice

[Anonymous No.6721636]

help

[Anonymous No.6721858]

>>6720470
Artist of >>6719771
Please tell me exactly what makes it low beg? Before you say anything about the colors I was intentionally trying the make the gaudiest colors I could as a test. If you have any critique about them other than the saturation please tell me.

[Anonymous No.6721876]

>>6721858
Nta but Colors a big one. I didn't know it was a test but they're not great colors. Also it looks really flat. Shading is so light it's almost non existing, and shading seems flat its like you shaded most shapes from the side. The body is shaped well

[Anonymous No.6721936]

>>6721858
i would say its int, but it looks like this is just artstyle, not purposeful cartoonization.

1. the line weight is terrible, especially for a cartoon artstyle.

2. the mouth is cleary misplaced/off centered.

3. the pen you use is terrible. it looks like your using real g-pen, but it doesnt look well with your style.

4. the clothing folds (particularly on the thigh area/lower skirt) is terrible.

5. symmetry. why is one ear bigger than the other one? its off putting and doesnt look purposeful.

overall, its just not too great. low-mid /beg/.

[Anonymous No.6721966]

>>6721876
Is this desaruated version any better or is the color choice that's bad? I also tried to make the shading more bold though I'm not sure where else I'd put it. Thanks for the compliment though.
>>6721936
I was experimenting with line weight actually. I see so many talented artists use no true line weight so I thought that I could cut corners by not adding it like usual so it's good to know it doesn't work. I tried to center the mouth but I'm not sure if it's in the right place. I used my finger to draw this piece also, not a pen. If you could tell me what's wrong with the folds that would be great. Also one ear is sort of bugger than to other because one of the ears folds over on itself.

[Anonymous No.6721968]

>>6721966
Forgot image augh.

[Anonymous No.6721987]

>>6721968
Yeah desaturated colors help a lot, shading looks better darker. I agree what the other person said about lineweight

[Anonymous No.6722041]

>>6721630
Bless you anon. thanks I thought it was the other one that was off. I'm a bit awk with side poses

[Anonymous No.6725413]

>>6720823
Rough.

[Anonymous No.6725419]

>>6714849
Yeah i know it's a bit stiff

[Anonymous No.6725421]

>>6725419
>forgot pick

[Anonymous No.6725591]

talk to em

[Anonymous No.6727622]

holy shit why is no one rating

[Anonymous No.6727628]

>>6727622
YOU do it !!!

[Anonymous No.6727630]

>>6727628
no im fucking lazy

[Anonymous No.6727651]

>>6727630
ok ill do it
>>6720610
beg
>>6720798
Hard to rate, the anatomy seems begish but the stylization and page layout is nice. Kind of hard to read what's going in the scene though because the values aren't very distinct.
>>6720823
Not really a fan of this (content wise), I like the shading in some areas (the collar bones) but it's kind of lacking everywhere else. Anatomy isn't the best either, especially the legs. They don't feel like they're actually grounded in the scene and honestly come across a little shriveled. I think with more practice though you'll make something of this.
>>6721435
Beautiful thumbnail, rough up close. Values need work, and the anatomy isn't quite there. Can't really tell what's going on in the background, I think they're lakes but they look kind of like ulcers. This has a lot of potential though anon, I do like it.
>>6721457
Composition and detail work is very fun! I'm not a huge fan of the use of heavy blacks but I guess that's really up to you. I'd like to see more variety in your lineweight and better shading. A lot of them just have this sort of purple cast on them that doesn't actually follow the shape of the figure or add any depth.
>>6721636
Figure on the right needs some help. I know she's got those ears on her head but not having any of the side of her head is making her face look very weird flat; like a mask. The neck is curving in strangely too and it's doesn't help. Her shoulders don't sit right either, and her arms (and hands) look broken. I'd grab a reference or two and study up. I do love the atmosphere in this scene however, the lighting is very easy on the eyes. I can't really get a read on the left one's intended expression, but im also autistic so it's probably just me.

[Anonymous No.6727654]

>>6725421
You're right, it is stiff, I do think your actual figures are nice though. You're using your shading productively and in a way that creates form, so props to that. It could still use work, of course, but I like what you've got going on. I think maybe moving where the scary four armed fella is standing would help the overall picture read better. His foot looks hella awkward pressed up against the fella on the ground. The guy on the ground's face is also a little flat, but Idk, maybe that's intentional.

[Anonymous No.6728486]

What do you think?

[Anonymous No.6728759]

post art and rates

[Anonymous No.6728799]

>>6714849
I’m late to thread. I only draw for internet clit

[Anonymous No.6728813]

[Anonymous No.6729296]

I want to start making some dosh but I don’t know if it’s worth trying with digital or if I should switch to oils or something

[Anonymous No.6729304]

>>6715874
>>6717563
Fantastic style and skills. My favorites in this thread.

[Anonymous No.6729309]

>>6728799
> I only draw for internet clit
...

[Anonymous No.6729315]

>>6714867
love it

[Anonymous No.6729319]

>>6715022
sovl

[Anonymous No.6729336]

[Anonymous No.6729472]

[Anonymous No.6729793]

>>6719949
>>6720050
>>6720055
thanks for the feedback. I feel like i need to work on developing a stronger sense of lighting because my painting is all over the place.

[Anonymous No.6729814]

I rate myself high beg

[Anonymous No.6729837]

>>6727622
I didn't want to rate but fine, I'll rate some images. Just be sure to rate some of the images I don't rate.

>>6729793
>>6725591
>>6721457
int, I think you're shading is pretty nice.
>>6729304
>>6729296
Low Int
>>6729814
I'd say just beg, not low or high somewhere in the middle.
>>6729472
>>6728813
>>6721636
Very wacky cartoonpilled. Beg
>>6729336
High/low beg? Honestly it's hard to say.
The background is nice, some of the shading is nice, but it also looks off and strange.

[Anonymous No.6730137]

>>6729336
real mismatch between the skill in rendering and the figures/shapes work on your shapes and you can have some real nice stuff

[Anonymous No.6731099]

>>6728486
/beg/, there's a real lack of focus here, i don't know what i'm getting from looking at this.

[Anonymous No.6731412]

>>6731099
Thank you for the feedback, but can you further clarify?
I don't quite understand what you mean by lack of focus.

[Anonymous No.6731477]

do studies count?

[Anonymous No.6731483]

Send me back down at terminal velocity because this one elevated my self esteem up to the stars!

[Anonymous No.6731690]

>>6731483
Strong

>>6731483
Style/10. Has form though

>>6729336
Beg

>>6729296
Pretty cool

>>6721968
No form, too flat

[Anonymous No.6731743]

>>6718493
Maybe ok the lower side of mid-int? It's hard to tell, your form seems good but its not colored and the lines seem scratchy in some areas I think with more hatching to shade it could look more finished and be on the higher side of mid int

>>6719176
Low-mid int

>>6719185
Lower mid int

>>6720036
Weird.. not badly done but something uncanny

>>6720056
Better lines would help

>>6720629
Mid beg

>>6720677
High beg

>>6720823
Mid beg their proportions are all messed up and shading is bad. Comp is cool, you should do human studies

>>6721435
Her face and ear a little wonky but the idea is there. High beg could be low int if you fixed the face

>>6721457
Cool but a visual mess. Too much color and stuff going on at once, NY eye doesn't know where to go. I think more intention behind where you're directing the viewer's eye. I cant tell where I'd put this

>>6721636
Cool, low int

>>6725591
Low int that one guys nose seems long. Horses look cool

>>6728486
Weird. Mid beg

>>6728799
High beg but good style

>>6728813
I really enjoy this, I've seen your stuff and youve make good gains. I like your spirit too

>>6729304
Needs more soul but mid int

>>6729472
Low to mid int

>>6729814
Mid beg

>>6731477
No

>>6731483
Good for the style. It looks kinda like a children's book style so the lewdness is juxtaposed for me, but cant lie it's well executed.

>>6731690
Well done, funny subject. Idk low to mid int?

[Anonymous No.6731982]

>>6731743
Thank you for rate anon! His nose is long intentionally, it’s art of someone else’s character.

[Anonymous No.6731987]

[Anonymous No.6732115]

>>6731690
high beg

[Anonymous No.6732131]

>>6729296
My favorite piece in this whole thread. Mid int

[Anonymous No.6732282]

swineherd

[Anonymous No.6732381]

finished this today, give it to me straight. I'm trying to learn to color and do clothing.

[Anonymous No.6732386]

>>6732381
How long have you been drawing?

[Anonymous No.6732401]

>>6732386
on and off since I was a kid if you count doodles and some classes in school, seriously maybe a year and a half with studies,bridgeman, figures, master studies etc.

[Anonymous No.6732403]

>>6732401
How old are you?

[Anonymous No.6732411]

>>6732403
30 yo boomer

[Anonymous No.6732419]

>>6732411
Look at you, great talent huh?

[Anonymous No.6732422]

>>6732381
This is cool

[Anonymous No.6732427]

>>6732381
fUCK YOU

[Anonymous No.6732440]

>>6732422
thanks fren
>>6732419
eh I dunno, I've got a big stack of really shitty sketchbooks and loose pages filled with cringe

[Anonymous No.6732441]

>>6732440
FUCK YOU
WAHT MAKES YOU BETTER THAN ME?

[Anonymous No.6732466]

>>6720251
real human being 10/10

[Anonymous No.6732515]

this one too

[Anonymous No.6732624]

>>6729336
I say this with no malice, but it's beg. You're spending far too much time on adding polish without building a solid foundation.

First learn perspective, then anatomy, then lighting/rendering, then color and detail. On the positive side, once you do all that, since you've practiced rendering and polish already, you can apply those skills to a more solid foundation.

Anyway, here's my most recent painting. Haven't been able to finish anything in a while. Life has just been kicking me the teeth over and over lately.

[Anonymous No.6732645]

>>6732427
>>6732441
JFC, you must be really fucking bad if that looks impressive to you.

[Anonymous No.6732740]

[Anonymous No.6732741]

>>6732740
these ones mostly from imagination

[Anonymous No.6732742]

>>6732741

[Anonymous No.6733126]

These threads have opened my eyes to how bad the average persons taste on this board are. Completely disconnected from normie mainstream sensibilities. However, if you are an inspiring porn artist this is probably the best thread for you. Very meaningful insights on how to stylize your work for best results. Thank you anons

[Anonymous No.6733844]

[Anonymous No.6733907]

>>6714878
>>6714889
>>6715022
>>6715053
>>6715097
>>6715273
>>6715361
>>6715927
>>6717090
>>6717104
>>6717146
>>6717219
>>6717611
>>6717697
>>6717717
>>6717985
>>6718002
>>6718728
>>6719185
>>6719561
>>6719773
>>6720036
>>6720051
>>6720055
>>6720610
>>6720629
>>6720823
>>6721435
>>6721457
>>6721636
>>6725421
>>6728486
>>6728813
>>6729336
>>6729814
>>6731987
>>6732740
>>6732741
begs in the thread

[Anonymous No.6733909]

>>6733907
>taking the time to do this
Cringe
>not including me
Woah based

[Anonymous No.6733912]

>>6714867
>>6714931
>>6715031
>>6715089
>>6715119
>>6715874
>>6716122
>>6716166
>>6716654
>>6717133
>>6717144
>>6717346
>>6717543
>>6717563
>>6718102
>>6718121
>>6718993
>>6719176
>>6725591
>>6729296
>>6729304
>>6729472
>>6729793
>>6731477
>>6731483
>>6732381
>>6732282
>>6733844
ints and above in the thread

[Anonymous No.6733913]

>>6733909
congrats anon

[Anonymous No.6734045]

>>6733907
Knew I was beg, Good to know motivates me to get better

[Anonymous No.6734051]

[Anonymous No.6734052]

I've still a lowly newfag to this board, but the advice you guys have given has been very useful. Drew for a buddy yesterday.

[Anonymous No.6734053]

[Anonymous No.6734055]

>>6733907
Pyw no draw fag

[Anonymous No.6734058]

>>6732381
Good lines and gesture imo. It does seem that your drawing is too far along to have so little ability to render. You'll gain ground fast if you apply yourself.

[Anonymous No.6734068]

>>6733907

>>>6732740
>/beg/

[Anonymous No.6734076]

>no rating
owari da

[Anonymous No.6734137]

[Anonymous No.6734140]

[Anonymous No.6734170]

>>6734137
Not bad.

[Anonymous No.6734173]

>>6734140
Cats are cool. Mid. Unnecessary details.

[Anonymous No.6734180]

>>6734051
Twitter?

[Anonymous No.6734227]

Ratings?

[Anonymous No.6734452]

Most recent one

[Anonymous No.6734569]

>>6734068
they all look like they have fetal alcohol syndrome, certainly beg tier

[Anonymous No.6734651]

What does it mean when I don't get crit

[Anonymous No.6734756]

>>6734569

you also classified this >>6720036 as beg, i have no words. you have no business being on an art critique forum since you suck so much dick at it

[Anonymous No.6734758]

>>6734756
It literally is beg? No understanding of color affinities

[Anonymous No.6734774]

>>6734758
lol everything you write reads like slobbering and gagging on a horse cock while you're wearing a dunce hat

[Anonymous No.6734777]

>>6734774
>t. Didn't pyw nor crit
Keep crying about it

[Anonymous No.6734789]

Most recent one, I got “lack of background syndrome” and need to practice more :/

[Anonymous No.6734857]

>>6734756
that is objectively beg, she looks like she has an inflamed thyroid

[Anonymous No.6735004]

>>6734777
you didn't do either of these things either though?

no, hucking shit like a monkey doesn't count as crit.

you are an imbecile.

[Anonymous No.6735013]

>>6735004
>still no ranking
Again keep crying. You have no rights to talk shit about opinions if you don't even post your own. Though probably you won't even need to because they'll be dogshit

[Anonymous No.6735033]

>>6735013
>your opinions will be dogshit

Ironic because all you did was group a couple drawings into extremely broad categories based on overly specific and arbitrary criteria. Your opinion was as much of an opinion as a belch is, and a good amount of artists you talk shit about would certainly mog you. But it's 4chan so I don't know why I'm acting surprised.

[Anonymous No.6735047]

>>6735033
Someone pissed they got called a beg lol

[Anonymous No.6735053]

>retarded pissbaby drama allowwd to go on
>no serious crits
Dead board

[Anonymous No.6735097]

The last thing I'm proud of.

[Anonymous No.6735114]

>>6735053
seethe and cope

[Anonymous No.6735118]

>>6733844
Ey love your shit Pineappleman

[Anonymous No.6735598]

>>6732742
No paws?

[Anonymous No.6736224]

>>6732381
So good at drawing and so average at coloring.

[Anonymous No.6736236]

>>6736224
I also couldn't resist coloring your sketch.

[Anonymous No.6736297]

Gabriel Varga a.k.a "Mr. Nobody", is a combat vet turned hitman who kills because he feels that is his only purpose in life. after killing too many people in a year, all of the gangs in japan that have felt the ruthlessness of Varga, decide to team up together to take him out and get revenge. All of the gangs send their best hitmen and assassins after Varga. It is now Gabriel Varga vs hundreds of hitmen and assassins, in an epic cat-and-mouse, John Wick style battle.

[Anonymous No.6736884]

>>6736224
damn, this is really cool, thanks anon. do you have a timelapse or something I could look at to see how you did it?
>>6736224
yeah, I'm aware of the skill gap (along with perspective, objects, clothing, multiple characters, etc) but that's the joy of drawing really, always something to learn.
>>6734058
thanks anon

[Anonymous No.6737206]

>>6734569
>>6734758

>drawings have 1 or 2 obvious errors that can likely be easily redressed by their artists with a more thorough application of fundamentals
>c-c-clearly this means the artists are hopeless beginners!! and they can’t draw for shit! r-right?

Fellas, turn your envy into something productive.

[Anonymous No.6737266]

>>6737206
Nowhere does beg imply “hopeless”beginner. NTA but those anons are beg. It’s not a bad thing. You are projecting.

Int implies a lack of obvious errors. No one who is actually at an intermediate skill level is producing work with errors as obvious and jarring as the ones above. Once they fix them, they’ll be int. Being beg doesn’t mean you’ll never improve, there’s no reason to mald.

[Anonymous No.6737313]

>>6737266
>No one who is actually at an intermediate skill level is producing work with errors as obvious and jarring as the ones above

guy who made the "fetal alcohol syndrome" guys here. yeah, they were "beg" as hell. i can take that since they were among my first serious attempts at realism lol

[Anonymous No.6737489]

newest piece, all original.

[Anonymous No.6737813]

>>6737313
>among my first serious attempts at realism
and youre doing so well that people are arguing you arent beg

i am the anon who called your art fetal alcohol, and if you keep going with this amount of steam you will rocket right out of this crab bucket
go anon go! GMI!

[Anonymous No.6737941]

>>6737813
thank you! ^^

[Anonymous No.6737958]

>>6714849
I posted this on the beg thread but never got a proper response aside from a comment on the subject and then "thumbs up". Like thanks but I am not looking for validation, I am looking for problems in my work I can't see so I can feel more deserving of the validation I get

[Anonymous No.6737975]

>>6718121
>Mid to high int I like this
its a fucking video game screenshot

[Anonymous No.6738115]

I didn't know there were people higher than /beg/ on this board damn

[Anonymous No.6738118]

>>6738115
Who?

[Anonymous No.6738123]

>>6738118
If I had to be super picky about it I'd say that these all are high /int/ or above

>>6729304
>>6715874
>>6717133
>>6717723
>>6718102
>>6720950

[Anonymous No.6738126]

>>6738123
>6717133
>6718102
>6729304
>High int
sure thing

[Anonymous No.6738180]

how would you rate me? ive been drawing for 3 years total.

[Anonymous No.6738241]

[Anonymous No.6738253]

>>6738180
>3 years
>Illustration40
ngmi

[Anonymous No.6738286]

>>6738253
I have been drawing for 3 years and have 400+ drawings of various quality. Am i gmi

[Anonymous No.6738292]

>>6738180
the arms are nice, but the torso is weird

[Anonymous No.6738312]

>>6738180
like 3 years on and off right?

[Anonymous No.6738336]

>>6738253
i drew on photoshop for a while before i switched to csp (its cheaper and better)

[Anonymous No.6738692]

>>6738312
yeah basically.

[Anonymous No.6738799]

maybe its too late to get any substantial responses

[Anonymous No.6738803]

>>6738799
mid-int but high /beg/ hands

[Anonymous No.6738842]

My only openly sexual digital painting, tried something uniquely arousing with only female presence

[Anonymous No.6738850]

I probably have better drawings from years ago but this is what I can do right now, I'm proud of it.
Please be sincere, went over the rendering and corrected every line I perceived as pixelated so this is the limit of what I can do (and I thought I could get away with giving an unfinished look to the ghostly stuff behind since it's wacky magic)


>>6738799
I love this fluffy style I might just try to copy it instead of fully rendering, the linework is amazing.
Uh... mid /int/ tier.

[Anonymous No.6740480]

>>6714878
Gonna make it

>>6719176
Medium to High int

>>6720251
Medium int

>>6720798
Starting pro

>>6729296
Pro

>>6729304
High int

>>6731477
Medium high int

>>6734140
High pro, flawless


>>6738850
I want to say low int, but I see a lot of work was put into this - so I think it's actually higher than that. If nothing else, I like it and you have potential so don't let anybody else tell you otherwise.

[Anonymous No.6740496]

[Anonymous No.6740500]

I haven't drawn anything in over a year. Decided to do a dragon ball style drawing. Trunten. Get it?

[Anonymous No.6740509]

Still learning how to draw on an Ipad.

[Anonymous No.6740825]

>>6740480
>>6736297
>>6732742
>>6732741
>>6732515
>>6738850
>>6738241
Beg
>>6738180
>>6737958
>>6734052
>>6732740
>>6732624
>>6740509
>>6740500
>>6740496
High beg


>>6737489
>>6736236
>>6734452
>>6734053
>>6733844

>>6738842
>>6738799
Int

>>6734789
>>6734140
>>6734137
>>6734051

Low pro/high int

[Anonymous No.6740931]

>>6740825
Are you baiting or are you blind?
>>6738842
This is clearly just crappy 3d asset porn with filters and you call this INT?

[Anonymous No.6740939]

Okay sure

[Anonymous No.6740949]

[Anonymous No.6740966]

[Anonymous No.6740984]

People ITT should really point out if they juat copied someone else's artwork 'cause the few good things here seem to be just studies

[Anonymous No.6740996]

>>6740984
kys tranny

[Anonymous No.6741019]

>>6740825
>High beg
Damn thanks I'm glad to see this, and I haven't been drawing consistently up til now either

[Anonymous No.6741310]

>>6740825
>not a beg
i...i did it !

[Anonymous No.6741590]

>>6740931
I guess that is just anons opinion. How would you rearrange these ratings out of curiosity?

[Anonymous No.6741791]

>>6729304
>>6740509
Very cute, blog?
>>6731743
>It looks kinda like a children's book style so the lewdness is juxtaposed for me, but cant lie it's well executed.
Thanks much. I find funny how consistent the storybook mention has become in recent years, it's something nice to hear. Also yeah, I was told how mismatching the cute and lewd elements are in my draws, Im still working my way to make them work, though I think I just need to roll with it because the style will always be in the way and... honestly the clash isnt so bad when there're people that find it a bit of a plus kek.
>>6733912
>My sorry ass made it to the ints
Nice

[Anonymous No.6741808]

[Anonymous No.6742166]

Sorry for adding so many, but these are my most recent with the bottom right being the oldest and the one im most aware of being a bit fucked anatomically. i consider myself int because i dont think i have a cohesice style

[Anonymous No.6742168]

Im indecisive so I added too many. The bottom right is the oldest and the one im most aware of being a bit fucked anatomically. I consider myself int because I dont think I have a cohesive style.

[Anonymous No.6744256]

Old piece. Uhh all my newer stuff is wip because i don't finish shit

[Anonymous No.6745290]

[Anonymous No.6746059]

Ngmi

[Anonymous No.6747479]

bumperino

[Anonymous No.6747537]

I can only draw a cube. Maybe one day I'll be worthy of being judged.