[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/ic/ - Artwork/Critique


View post   

File: 745 KB, 648x1152, 1686759196943552.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6701362 No.6701362 [Reply] [Original]

Fill up ze blank blac areas so You can say you drevv today.

>> No.6701367

why use an AI image as the template of all things

>> No.6701369

>>6701362
AI art is valid
Your AI art passes
AI art is beautiful
AI art rights!!

>> No.6701379
File: 149 KB, 768x1408, 1686750353194777.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6701379

>>6701367
I feel like its 1988 again when Adobe Photoshop 0.63 come out and all ze traditional "artist" stratred seetin since something about digital art is not real ard. news flash; Nobody Cares about your feelings. AI art is here FOREVER and you need to cope (or rope) with this new reality /you can thank Cern( as they are. Zimble ass.

>> No.6701380

>>6701379
digital artists aren't welcome among traditional artists, and you won't be welcome among either since you're not even an artist. It can stay but definitely not here. so rope yourself knowing that ywnbaa

>> No.6701382
File: 46 KB, 590x342, Aliens-Etch-489022.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6701382

>>6701379
>the lights in the sky finally arrived
Verification not required.

>> No.6701385

Idk looks like fanart of Kate from Shadow House (wouldn't know if it's ai gen or not but isn't ai shit at getting character details down?)

>> No.6701387

>>6701379
It’s not even giving me a chuckle anymore whenever I read these it’s just actually nothing now

>> No.6701388

>>6701380
>ywnbaa
lmfao, who said i wan to be an artist? all i want is to produce nice pictures for myself. art is gay anyvvay

>> No.6701389

>>6701385
The clothes and shading is a dead giveaway that it’s ai

>> No.6701395
File: 209 KB, 1024x1536, 1686757046666273.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6701395

nobody can draw like picrel. its not 3d, its not 2d. this is a new art form. we need our own board. /g/ is too fast and /ic/ is tradition digital and traditional cave art.

>> No.6701401
File: 80 KB, 1800x1054, maurizio-cattelan-banana.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6701401

>>6701395
why untalented people think they are always pioneers of something new just cause they are not good?

>> No.6701402

>>6701401
>untalented people
nigga ive been working as a pro illustrator an conzept artist since 2011. post your work.

>> No.6701403

>>6701395
>nobody can draw like picrel.
Except the entire way these things were 'trained" is by using actual people's art - so yes people DO draw like that, and I've seen plenty of stuff like that from artists on twitter.
AI can do some unique surreal stuff that no human artist would likely do because of the tedium of it, but jerking off over stuff artists have been doing for ages and acting as if it's never been done before is embarrassing.

>> No.6701404

Why is this retard having a meltdown the last few days?

>> No.6701409

>>6701404
nobody tell her guys

>> No.6701413

>AI roach requesting art
The fucking irony. Stupid subhuman.

>> No.6701417
File: 211 KB, 1600x702, A6152-Art-Movement-Photorealism-Image-5.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6701417

>>6701395
That makes no sense. Artists can make exact replicas of photos if they wish to but there is no personal expression in that, so nobody would bother (though some have as a technical challenge.)

>> No.6701420

pretty mediocre, managed to get a few angry replies tho, 3/10

>> No.6701421
File: 165 KB, 1024x1024, 1686391157838630.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6701421

>>6701417
tbqhvvu i am more impressed by stable diffusion than human xerox art. it was always lame. just imagine what would be DaVinci capable of if he had access to zis technology

>> No.6701423

>>6701421
Man, you aren't even trying anymore with your bait posts.

>> No.6701425

>>6701421
>it's just a fishing rod, he threw it right in the water
><)))o>

>> No.6701427
File: 2.99 MB, 1920x1080, 1686814934170844.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6701427

>>6701423
how am i even baiting at this point? pyvv.

>> No.6701433
File: 237 KB, 1284x980, 1523574628426.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6701433

>ze traditional artist
>drevv
>pyvv

>> No.6701438
File: 285 KB, 1872x1082, 1546076404541.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6701438

>>6701427
>pyw
Sure buddy.

>> No.6701453
File: 43 KB, 750x500, 15131033-v9-wef-bolsonaro1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6701453

>>6701433
>33

>> No.6701454

>>6701438
rate this painting like is 2016 and you dont heve a clue about ai

>> No.6701455
File: 3.47 MB, 1920x1080, 1686814863233273.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6701455

>>6701454
zis one

>> No.6701458
File: 44 KB, 850x400, 1663368252127226.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6701458

>>6701455

>> No.6701463

>>6701433
Fr*nch ppl are gay

>> No.6701469

>>6701458
*it takes 25 minutes to learn az ze broompts, one minute to generate

>> No.6701472

>>6701463
I think he's emulating the likeness of a jewish man rather than a fr*nch one

>> No.6701474

>>6701362
>AI "artist" requesting for art

I see some layer of irony hidden here.

>> No.6701477
File: 3.09 MB, 2000x1216, 1686717324980177.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6701477

>>6701474
>>AI "artist" requesting for art
would you participate in z thread if op png was drawn by a human? i could dew it by hand it it wasn't such a waste of time
real EU hours

>> No.6701479

>>6701477
>would you participate in z thread if op png was drawn by a human?

Then it would actually be an actual fun thread. A similar thread exists already by the way, it's called the telephone game or whatever. AI art is inherently worthless at best and actively malevolent at worst so get used to be people shitting on it.

>> No.6701481

ai shills = ai niggers = diaperfags

>> No.6701487
File: 455 KB, 1600x1170, 1686733303507974.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6701487

>>6701479
>worthless at best and actively malevolent at worst
i get your point, but what would you do in a few months or years when ai pics are gon be indistinguishable from art created by biorobots?

>> No.6701493

>>6701454
3/10, would not trend on artstation.

>> No.6701494

>>6701487
Those art are made from drawings made by actual humans, unless you are implying they can just be made out of thin air. What your argument basically boils down to are the pop-sci onions notion that basically everything is going to be replaced by super intelligent general AIs. Might as well neck yourself right now since you'll be obsolete as well.

>> No.6701502
File: 1.52 MB, 4608x3456, 1686754140117609.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6701502

>>6701494
>you'll be obsolete as wel
i already stated i am not an ai artist. i am using it in my workflow bot its too much in diepers rn. still usefool tool though. full version wasnt released yet. watch ze ai scene from *ewish movie Wag the Dog 1997

>> No.6701506

>>6701472
someone upvote this man! Poggers! quirky online personality!

>> No.6701507

>>6701362
>>6701379
You VVILL use ze AI!

>> No.6701508

>>6701477
>i could dew it by hand it it wasn't such a waste of time
kek, no, you couldn't.

>> No.6701522

>>6701502
Is this Chris?

>> No.6701541
File: 80 KB, 736x736, katejpg.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6701541

>>6701362
Imagine looking at this fun shadow girl design and thinking "she needs a painfully boring dress and ze blanc areas filled".
AI tastelet behaviour.

>> No.6701545

>>6701367
because he wanted to make it better?

because he wanted people to actually add the soul and creativity he likes about it?

because it's an easy way to generate cool templates?

you're overthinking it

>> No.6701557

>>6701522
No. Maybe antichris thought.

>> No.6701560

>>6701545
trying to justify your thread, eh?

>> No.6701563

>>6701508
I can do it if you want me to all you need to do is to pay me half a bitcoin.

>> No.6701566

>>6701563
>>6701508
>kek, no, you couldn't.