It begins

File: 67 KB, 596x602, AI shit.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

Anonymous Fri May 26 18:42:50 2023 No.6674341 [Reply] [Original]

It begins

>>	Anonymous Fri May 26 18:44:55 2023 No.6674345 File: 263 KB, 850x1433, OH NO NO NO.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Fri May 26 18:45:05 2023 No.6674346 >rayark >cytus >deemo literally who

>>	Anonymous Fri May 26 18:46:19 2023 No.6674349 >>6674346 Shit that was popular in early 2000s that died off.

>>	Anonymous Fri May 26 18:46:25 2023 No.6674350 As long as the average commoner pays for it, we cannot do much. It is like the mobile game scene, loads of trash cash grab being successful, generating even more trash cash grab.

Anonymous Fri May 26 18:48:43 2023 No.6674351

>>6674341
I do not draw because I want to get a job in the industry. I draw because I want to put a piece of my soul onto paper. Others can come and appreciate it if they want, but at the end of the day I draw because it is wonderful to see your efforts take life. To point at something and say "I made this." If the general population is too busy consuming AI material, that's their problem.

>>	Anonymous Fri May 26 18:49:19 2023 No.6674352 they are retards, most rhytm game players are women and they tend to side with artists on an autistic degree

>>	Anonymous Fri May 26 18:51:41 2023 No.6674356 >>6674352 Anyone that’s not a shit skin like you will side with the artist

>>	Anonymous Fri May 26 18:52:06 2023 No.6674358 >>6674341 YET ANOTHER AI MF THREAD. You guys have been acting as a bunch of emotional little women about it for so long now.

>>	Anonymous Fri May 26 18:54:11 2023 No.6674359 Rayrark is a privately owned Taiwanese game company that’s nearly bankrupt, and virtually no one knows who the fuck they are. You’re surprised they would fire employees and use AI?

>>	Anonymous Fri May 26 18:55:38 2023 No.6674363 File: 1.10 MB, 1536x5128, mgwhkqhta52b1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6674341 You basically have no chance, Adapt or you will end your career soon

>>	Anonymous Fri May 26 18:56:19 2023 No.6674365 >>6674352 go back to your containment board your dirty jeet

>>	Anonymous Fri May 26 18:58:21 2023 No.6674367 >>6674363 You do realize that’s a lot of work to churn out something that ends up looking like shit, right?

>>	Anonymous Fri May 26 18:59:24 2023 No.6674368 >>6674341 > take their pictures > make a shitty product using them doing only minor edits > sell them just beneath their social media posts what legally prevents anyone from doing this?

>>	Anonymous Fri May 26 19:00:04 2023 No.6674370 File: 21 KB, 352x352, xhpk1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6674341 meanwhile i can't even draw a cube without wobbly lines despite fapping to drawabox. it's so over can ai at least cover my genetic talentlessness?

>>	Anonymous Fri May 26 19:01:45 2023 No.6674372 >>6674341 >>6674345 AI won't take artist's jobs AI won't replace artists AI is just a tool for artists

>>	Anonymous Fri May 26 19:08:47 2023 No.6674377 File: 1.75 MB, 6148x1536, v6bj7whta52b1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6674367 A way less time than by doing your scribbling in photoshop.

>>	Anonymous Fri May 26 19:19:42 2023 No.6674386 >>6674363 This looks terrible. What the hell is the guy on the right's expression supposed to be? They're in a fight and he's blocking the spear, yet he looks like he's strolling in a park and somebody just told a whimsical joke.

>>	Anonymous Fri May 26 19:20:26 2023 No.6674388 File: 60 KB, 817x824, least sociopathic AIcuck.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6674341 >>6674345 >>6674363 >>6674377 this you?

>>	Anonymous Fri May 26 19:22:58 2023 No.6674391 >>6674377 this image alone proves once again that ai in its greatest state only appeals to lazy, autistic artists and the lowest common denominator

>>	Anonymous Fri May 26 19:23:27 2023 No.6674393 >>6674377 this not only looks ultra generic but bad. i wont deny this have high fundies but the ejecution of the whole thing is boring. the point of art being realistic died the moment the camera was invented.

>>	Anonymous Fri May 26 19:24:46 2023 No.6674397 >>6674377 this is somehow more soulless than photobashing

>>	Anonymous Fri May 26 19:24:51 2023 No.6674398 >>6674388 I think their should be a collection of moments or comments that show how insane and inhuman these ai parasites are for everyone to see

>>	Anonymous Fri May 26 19:26:15 2023 No.6674401 >>6674388 Christ, talk about ends justify the means. They're literally incapable of even contemplating the concept that they might not be in the right, just that they're gonna take and that's all there is to it.

>>	Anonymous Fri May 26 19:28:58 2023 No.6674403 >>6674377 The horse looks so fucked up. What the fuck is that neck lmao. Do ai niggers really?

Anonymous Fri May 26 19:32:36 2023 No.6674407

>>6674377
It’s less time, but it just looks bad. If I saw that one someone’s twitter feed and didn’t know what AI was, I’d be like, “damn, that looks like it took awhile, but it looks bad.” Then I’d keep scrolling until I saw something a human made that actually took several hours and looks infinitely more interesting.

>>	Anonymous Fri May 26 19:42:06 2023 No.6674419 >>6674403 This picture was not about the horse or perfect-Proco-anatomy. It is a showcase how to use mighty AI for your own ideas.

Anonymous Fri May 26 19:42:21 2023 No.6674420

Since from what I know, AI art is not copyright protected so just throw what these companies generate onto merch sites like red bubble, etc. Put it in your videos, art work etc. Steal the designs, backgrounds, etc. they make with AI.
What are they going to do? It was made by a machine and has no protections.
If you want to make a change fight back.

>>	Anonymous Fri May 26 19:45:06 2023 No.6674427 >>6674420 Yes, AI is not copyrightable since it’s stolen data, kek. Meanwhile, artists can copyright their original work. Kekekrs

>>	Anonymous Fri May 26 19:47:05 2023 No.6674432 >>6674419 but I don’t want my ideas to look like shit

>>	Anonymous Fri May 26 19:47:38 2023 No.6674433 >>6674427 Meanwhile, artists trace AI art and claim it as their own pictures. How about that, copyright-kek?

>>	Anonymous Fri May 26 19:49:06 2023 No.6674437 >>6674432 skill issue right there, pal the tools are the same for everyone ;)

>>	Anonymous Fri May 26 19:49:11 2023 No.6674438 >>6674433 Meanwhile, only a literal who foreverbeg non achiever would do that KEK.

>>	Anonymous Fri May 26 19:50:12 2023 No.6674439 >>6674437 Originality is clearly not the same for everyone, especially people using AI to generate ideas.

>>	Anonymous Fri May 26 19:50:24 2023 No.6674440 >>6674437 using ai is a skill issue lmao

>>	Anonymous Fri May 26 19:51:25 2023 No.6674442 >>6674388 >pookienumnums Let me guess, tranny?

>>	Anonymous Fri May 26 19:52:13 2023 No.6674444 >>6674398 This was posted like a day after a guy made a meme using a voice actor's voice and then that VA sent his whole team to doxx, harass, and destroy that person and got him to delete his entire account.

>>	Anonymous Fri May 26 19:52:18 2023 No.6674445 >>6674433 >trace ai >copyright it >if they complain, say the ai replicated my style because they scraped my work and demand they pay me

>>	Anonymous Fri May 26 19:53:06 2023 No.6674446 >>6674377 >>6674419 Your English us slipping, Mr. Redeem.

>>	Anonymous Fri May 26 19:54:29 2023 No.6674448 >>6674437 If you had skills, you wouldn't even need AI.

>>	Anonymous Fri May 26 19:55:40 2023 No.6674450 >>6674407 This isn't a fair comparison because the human gets several hours while this guy probably made this whole thing start to finish in 5 minutes

>>	Anonymous Fri May 26 19:56:02 2023 No.6674451 > Please give me money for providing absolutely nothing of value whatsoever AIfags everywhere

>>	Anonymous Fri May 26 19:59:16 2023 No.6674453 >>6674368 Literally nothing. >>6674388 God damn these trannies are feeling uppity. Really drank all of that Altman propaganda kool aid, huh.

>>	Anonymous Fri May 26 20:00:43 2023 No.6674455 >>6674450 >5 minutes delusional

Anonymous Fri May 26 20:03:00 2023 No.6674465

How big resolution-wise can AI go realistically?
I keep seeing people putting 8k and such in prompts, but the image is always so tiny it can’t even be retouched without pain, the ai up scaling is garbage, and you’d need to downscale again for most purposes

>>	Anonymous Fri May 26 20:04:31 2023 No.6674467 >>6674465 The problem is speed. The most common GPU according to steam is a 1650 and it would take 1 minute to generate >>6674377 at 512 by 512, but nearly 9 minutes to generate at 2k by 2k If you have a solid gaming computer, it's probably easy.

>>	Anonymous Fri May 26 20:05:28 2023 No.6674468 >>6674465 You need a ton of vram to make bigger images and it takes longer

Anonymous Fri May 26 20:09:11 2023 No.6674472

>>6674341
>>6674346
>>6674349
>>6674359
How far Rayark have fallen. At least for Deemo, the main draw was the art and the story. It even got a feature film. Now they're sullying their reputation with AI. Stuff must be dire over there if they can't hire artists anymore.

>>	Anonymous Fri May 26 20:12:36 2023 No.6674477 >>6674467 >>6674468 I figured, that’s why I said realistically, is it even worth it if you need a render farm to play lottery for a usable image and still need someone to edit it?

>>	Anonymous Fri May 26 20:14:25 2023 No.6674480 File: 1.57 MB, 1078x6983, goodmorning.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] Even the coomers who comment on nhentai don't like it kek

>>	Anonymous Fri May 26 20:15:59 2023 No.6674481 >>6674480 What is the doujin?

Anonymous Fri May 26 20:16:30 2023 No.6674484

>>6674477
You don't need a render farm, a computer that can play returnal at high quality or is at 8gb/ 12 gb vram already probably generates the horse pic above at 4k in a minute

also even then, you go from a bunch of artists to 1 guy you can probably pay 1/4th the money for half the work

>>	Anonymous Fri May 26 20:18:42 2023 No.6674489 >>6674481 My Fat Maid Can’t Be This Tsun-Tsun - A Story Of How I Turned My Petite Maid Into An Eight Hundred Pound Silverback Gorilla That Lays Waste To All Before Her in The Japanese National Sumo Federation Championship Ring

Anonymous Fri May 26 20:19:36 2023 No.6674491

>>6674368
Sadly there's currently nothing stopping nAIggers from img2img'ing an artist's work and trying to sell it in replies or shilling "their" picture shitter trained on said artist's work. It's basically how there was nothing stopping tracers in the past, but typically it took too much time and effort to get anything out of it so most people outside of DA artists and random 3rd world pornsites never bothered to make a hobby out of it, but this shit removes most all barriers to entry.

Anonymous Fri May 26 20:20:17 2023 No.6674492

>>6674472
I guess most people behind AI hype are completely unaware of the basics.that people in the entertainment industry are paying for a display of artistry and creative achievement, not for a image, I can go on google and get infinite images for free.

When tens of thousands of people go to a concert to watch their favourite band, the group might be drunk, might be out of tune, they will sing like shit, they will commit mistakes, but people will still support them over and over and watch their concerts, why the fuck is that? can't they simply listen to the audio of the songs? because they want to support people don't shit that is impressive and that shows skill and passion, this is what people pay money for.

the fuckers are mixing artistry with assets and props, thinking that just because people give money for the former they will give money for the later.

>>	Anonymous Fri May 26 20:22:10 2023 No.6674496 File: 75 KB, 280x247, Wtf.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6674489

>>	Anonymous Fri May 26 20:24:07 2023 No.6674500 >>6674484 A pic at 4k working resolution is 1080p commercial

Anonymous Fri May 26 20:24:26 2023 No.6674501

All this ai spam feels like grooming.
Remember that time when discord degenerates were blackmailing dumb kids into taking hormone pills and posting erotic photos of themselves? Same shit really.
Every thread reads like
>give up goyim, you lost just use ai yeeee doit you lost use ai ai ai ai
And at the same time it's a weird gloat about how every artist will lose income and become fucking poor yeeeeeeee.

tldr AI threads are made by jealous noskill seethig schizo.
Or it's another discord raid campaign
Same shit really

Anonymous Fri May 26 20:27:24 2023 No.6674504

>>6674492
From my experience this is not even remotely true, people still go to these bands because even when they make minor mistakes they still end up really really good or because even their mistakes can be endearing.

If you started a garage band and did nothing but extremely shitty ear destroying sounds, you would get no viewers, and if the beatles did it, it would be fun as a novelty or a quirky surprise exactly one time, but if they kept doing it they would be gone.

Anonymous Fri May 26 20:27:28 2023 No.6674506
File: 58 KB, 304x620, 1684040063927378.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>6674341
>Rayark
>it's a shitty mobile game company
Mobile games are a firehose of diarrhea that "developers" churn out trying to land a retard with money to spend on microtransactions. The rest of the mobile marketplace isn't much better. I get almost all my apps from F-Droid and only step into the hellhole called the Google Play Store if I absolutely cannot get something anywhere else.
So. Congratulations, AIshitters! You've managed to... make the mobile game marketplace even worse. It's a pretty amazing feat, actually, I didn't think the bar could get any lower. But I suppose roaches of a feeler swarm together, as the old saying goes. You really are a match made in hell.

>>	Anonymous Fri May 26 20:29:19 2023 No.6674510 >>6674489 Can’t find it

Anonymous Fri May 26 20:30:03 2023 No.6674513

>>6674504
> even when they make minor mistakes they still end up really really good or because even their mistakes can be endearing.

> they want to support people that do shit that is impressive and that shows skill and passion, this is what people pay money for.

You literally agree with me.

>>	Anonymous Fri May 26 20:31:24 2023 No.6674515 >>6674513 There is a limit to that, your mistakes are endearing or can be ignored... to a point. If you show up and you're all mistakes and no quality, you're toasted.

>>	Anonymous Fri May 26 20:31:34 2023 No.6674516 >>6674377 This will just make people get tired of "realistic fantasy" style much faster. Which is good.

>>	Anonymous Fri May 26 20:31:54 2023 No.6674518 >>6674510 I made it up

Anonymous Fri May 26 20:39:00 2023 No.6674525

>>6674351
This.
I draw because I want to create something, is it good? Does it make the world better? No, but I still draw. If I earn money, cool;
If I don't, cool as well. Simple as.

Those who draw for money were cucked from the beginning because the second people can choose to not pay you, well here we are.

Anonymous Fri May 26 20:42:52 2023 No.6674530

>>6674341
>>6674345

Why are they so butt-salty about it

Why are you attempting to fight A.I lmao

Just become talented OR change profession and become talented at that with everything youve learned so far

Like Jesus Christ, I hate AI but artfags are just delusional

>>	Anonymous Fri May 26 20:45:07 2023 No.6674535 >>6674351 Exactly if you can or even feel in the slightest that you can be replaced by A.I you were doing a souless job/activity to begin with Twitter trannies fail to realize this Too much pride, arrogance, victimism and mediocrity from their side

>>	Anonymous Fri May 26 20:45:26 2023 No.6674536 >>6674480 Idk why aitards thought coomers would eat up aishit. Most artists are coomers themselves and all unanimously hate aishit

>>	Anonymous Fri May 26 20:47:00 2023 No.6674540 File: 47 KB, 1067x393, i0.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] a >>>/diy/ chair from Joe will always be more worth than a chair from IKEA.

Anonymous Fri May 26 20:47:47 2023 No.6674543

>>6674525
This is what happens to most jobs historically, fishing with a fishing rod used to be the best, then we got fishing nets and cages and fishing rod fishing became a hobby to prove your strength.

Home gardening used to a job to make money, now we have the combine harvester and gardening is about showing your patience and diligence.

I basically think most of the guys that complain about AI destroying the soul of art just don't actually care about art, they just want to keep their job.

Anonymous Fri May 26 20:48:37 2023 No.6674544

I'm going to accept fate.
I will start pivoting to offering my services fixing minor mistakes the AI makes in photoshop.
If they want to call me a brushmonkey, that's fine. If it only pays a few dollars per fix fine, I will do more of them.
It's better than not getting paid at all, and if I jump in now then I will be ahead of others in making a name for myself.

Good luck everyone

>>	Anonymous Fri May 26 20:51:16 2023 No.6674548 >>6674543 aren't you tired of those shitty comparisons?

>>	Anonymous Fri May 26 20:51:27 2023 No.6674549 >>6674544 good, I will rise the price of my commissions.

Anonymous Fri May 26 20:51:36 2023 No.6674550

>ATTENTION
ATTENTION
>ATTENTION
ATTENTION

CALLING ALL MY FELLOW BUTT-HURT TWITTER TRANNIES

DO NOT BUY *INSERT BUSSINES NAME HERE* PRODUCTS

I REPEAT

DO NOT BUY *INSERT BUSSINES NAME HERE* PRODUCTS

THEY ARE VERY VERY BAD PEOPLE AND THEY WORK FOR THE ENEMY

DEATH TO A.I

HE WILL NOT DIVIDE US

>>	Anonymous Fri May 26 20:51:53 2023 No.6674551 File: 949 KB, 1198x677, i0.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] a >>>/diy/ chair from Joe will always be more worth than a chair from IKEA.

>>	Anonymous Fri May 26 20:52:46 2023 No.6674552 File: 14 KB, 190x200, 1628706775289.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6674550 Why are you so angry?

>>	Anonymous Fri May 26 20:53:20 2023 No.6674554 >>6674550 Twitter people are such massive freaks They literally behave like 11 year olds who get butt-hurt and assblasted by everything cant do shit except complain and waste their time doing retarded shit so entitled

>>	Anonymous Fri May 26 20:54:52 2023 No.6674555 >>6674554 > “cant do shit except complain and waste their time doing retarded shit” >said by a shitposter on a basket weaving fourm

>>	Anonymous Fri May 26 20:54:57 2023 No.6674556 >>6674552 >angry Thought it was apparent I was making fun of you lol I guess I have to be EXTRA sarcastic next time so you get it Huh slow in the brain I guess

>>	Anonymous Fri May 26 20:55:15 2023 No.6674557 >>6674530 >>6674535 >>6674543 >>6674550 >>6674554 Literally obsessed kek . Keep responding to yourself though

>>	Anonymous Fri May 26 20:55:59 2023 No.6674560 >>6674555 >said you here Doesnt matter its the truth lol, youre so butthurt by it arent you pal

>>	Anonymous Fri May 26 20:56:07 2023 No.6674561 >>6674525 Its cute that aifags still think they will make any money from AI kek. >Pixiv >Pawoo >Dlsite Patreon ban is next.. tik tok aifags...

>>	Anonymous Fri May 26 20:56:08 2023 No.6674562 File: 9 KB, 468x148, file.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6674557 Maybe you should hand-draw some meds lmao

>>	Anonymous Fri May 26 20:57:28 2023 No.6674564 >>6674562 He should open a thread on twitter Obviously.

>>	Anonymous Fri May 26 20:57:59 2023 No.6674565 >>6674560 Why are you pajeets so retarded?

>>	Anonymous Fri May 26 20:59:47 2023 No.6674566 >>6674565 Youre a pajeet Im guessing

>>	Anonymous Fri May 26 21:02:05 2023 No.6674570 >>6674566 An esl too, not surprised your kind keeps shitting up the board.

Anonymous Fri May 26 21:02:58 2023 No.6674572

>AI spam
>AI stealing
>AI replacing artists in companies
Kek, literally everything that we doomposted in October last year is coming into fruition. All that's remaining is sophisticated AI fake news, but we're steadily getting there as well.

AI cultists meanwhile haven't updated their retorts to the dystopia that they've successfully unleashed.

>>	Anonymous Fri May 26 21:04:07 2023 No.6674575 >>6674570 You have mental retardation and youre delusional aswell, I guess you arent aware

>>	Anonymous Fri May 26 21:07:11 2023 No.6674577 >>6674572 >AI cultists meanwhile haven't updated their retorts to the dystopia that they've successfully unleashed. u mad?

>>	Anonymous Fri May 26 21:08:32 2023 No.6674581 >>6674572 It seems that the company is about to go bankrupt because not even hardcore gashafags can be convinced to pay for fucking AI generated skins.

Anonymous Fri May 26 21:09:16 2023 No.6674583

>>6674548
They seem to overlook how the individual artist being "replaced" relies entirely on the works of that artist. As in, a picture shitter cannot replace you unless somebody specifically uses enough of your works to train a model designed to specifically replace your individual artwork.
Things like OP are admittedly a bit different since the company apparently only wanted art assets and doesn't really care about individual artists' styles, but even then it's likely they're using the art of people they used to employ in order for their model to produce the results they want.

>>	Anonymous Fri May 26 21:11:24 2023 No.6674588 >>6674543 >comparing art to manual labor Don't act like you care about art either

>>	Anonymous Fri May 26 21:11:30 2023 No.6674589 >>6674363 Looks stiff and composition is shit

>>	Anonymous Fri May 26 21:14:11 2023 No.6674593 >>6674581 AI is made to scam investors not your own customers.

>>	Anonymous Fri May 26 21:14:14 2023 No.6674594 File: 1.50 MB, 765x2365, 1683745815354336.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] If you stand against AI, you are literally a transphobe and hitler. Your AI art passes. AI art is real art. AI rights are human rights.

>>	Anonymous Fri May 26 21:14:20 2023 No.6674595 >>6674589 >Looks stiff and composition is shit Eternal problems in art.

>>	Anonymous Fri May 26 21:14:46 2023 No.6674598 >>6674543 God, can you fucking imagine trying to compare agriculture or any other tech advances to the humanities. The difference is that the arts are human pursuits. What the fuck is mentally wrong with you people who can’t grasp that?

>>	Anonymous Fri May 26 21:15:29 2023 No.6674600 >>6674575 You don’t even know on how to use those words, shitskin. Using words you don’t understand.

>>	Anonymous Fri May 26 21:15:54 2023 No.6674602 >>6674543 >most of the guys that complain about AI destroying the soul of art just don't actually care about art Do you? This shit devalues and dehumanizes all art except for the contepctualist bana-taped-to-wall money laundering kind of """art""".

>>	Anonymous Fri May 26 21:17:08 2023 No.6674606 >>6674598 Also, again, none of those other advances directly require the uncompleted output of the "replaced" in order to function.

>>	Anonymous Fri May 26 21:18:32 2023 No.6674611 >>6674598 Also, again, none of those other advances directly require the uncompensated output of the "replaced" in order to function.

>>	Anonymous Fri May 26 21:18:46 2023 No.6674613 >>6674345 >just a tool bro

>>	Anonymous Fri May 26 21:20:37 2023 No.6674620 This shit is like McDonald's replacing their hamburger meat for insect meat because it's cheaper. I get that some people consume slop, but miss me with this shit. I will literally pay premium for good, well made and rare handcrafted art

>>	Anonymous Fri May 26 21:21:28 2023 No.6674622 File: 206 KB, 768x1024, gettyimages-200161301-001-1024x1024.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] Adapt or die luddites.

Anonymous Fri May 26 21:21:29 2023 No.6674623
File: 723 KB, 2513x1783, n-holocaust-a-20151106.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>6674602
If you care about the humanity of art then AI wouldn't threaten you at all, you can still draw all the awesome humanlike and soulful expressions of humanity you want, and surely you'll find an audience for it, except you won't and everyone hates your art and that's why you're scared shitless of AI instead of just waiting for it to fade into obscurity

Anonymous Fri May 26 21:23:31 2023 No.6674627

>>6674620
It’s almost like that, except replacing meat with insect meat is more ethical than consuming cow meat due to the sentience hierarchy. Art is an extremely unique field because it literally requires a human to exist. No human requires meat to exist within the context of a first world civilization, they just choose to eat it.

>>	Anonymous Fri May 26 21:24:25 2023 No.6674628 >>6674554 Says the faggot desperately shilling AI

>>	Anonymous Fri May 26 21:24:34 2023 No.6674629 >>6674622 You failing to learn a skill doesn’t mean you’re more progressive. Kek. You failed to adapt, and now you’re using AI.

Anonymous Fri May 26 21:25:00 2023 No.6674632
File: 3.73 MB, 1506x1548, 1668768679767235.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>6674594
She actually makes a good point, art should not be limited to white trust fund babies who's daddy pays for art school.
If AI art means that more people can reach their creative potential I'm all for it.
THIS DOES NOT MEAN THAT YOU STILL CANT CREATE ART, IT MEANS MORE PEOPLE WILL BE ABLE TO!
fucking idiots...

>>	Anonymous Fri May 26 21:25:42 2023 No.6674634 >>6674572 >everything that nullifies fair use is coming into fruition

Anonymous Fri May 26 21:27:12 2023 No.6674636

>>6674627
Much like nobody requires art to live or survive, in that sense, art and entertainment is a luxury.

Still having good art is nice just like having good meat to eat.

And if you are trying to sell me cockroaches for the price of a beef I will say fuck you, and the same as people trying to sell AI as artwork or trying to implement it on the places where the visual art is important.

>>	Anonymous Fri May 26 21:27:26 2023 No.6674637 >>6674632 Are you retarded? Artists don’t require schooling or university education. That’s a fucking meme. Being gifted depends on your neurology, but learning a skill is up to you and how you spend your time. You’re a brainless faggot.

>>	Anonymous Fri May 26 21:27:36 2023 No.6674638 >>6674629 This is basically incel uprising in action. The useless and pathetic are having their revenge on the skillful and talented now that they have bionic implants that allow them to pretend they're chads

>>	Anonymous Fri May 26 21:28:21 2023 No.6674642 >>6674341 >>6674345 >and better games lmao

>>	Anonymous Fri May 26 21:29:30 2023 No.6674646 >>6674572 Hear me out: have you considered that eating the lotus is le good?

>>	Anonymous Fri May 26 21:30:02 2023 No.6674647 >>6674632 you don't create art using AI tho

Anonymous Fri May 26 21:30:12 2023 No.6674648

>>6674636
No one requires art to survive, but I don’t think anyone ever made that claim, whereas people genuinely once thought you needed meat to survive, and in fact, some people still do think that. Given the choice, I would rather live in a world absent of meat rather than absent of art, since the sensory pleasure someone might get out of eating meat is easily replaced, compared to the lifetime of joy found in books, comics, manga, graphic novels, movies, plays, music, etc. There’s no logical reason to choose insects over beef as an alternative anyway. There are literally dozens of meat replacements if people feel like pretending to eat meat.

>>	Anonymous Fri May 26 21:30:33 2023 No.6674649 >>6674637 >Are you retarded? No I'm just baiting, please rate.

>>	Anonymous Fri May 26 21:31:22 2023 No.6674652 Art survived commoditization of supplies, mass production, photography, digitization, etc. Good art will survive.

>>	Anonymous Fri May 26 21:31:25 2023 No.6674653 > AI art > For AI generated games > Being sold to fake AI generated customers > That pay fake AI generated money I see no issues with it kek.

>>	Anonymous Fri May 26 21:34:33 2023 No.6674660 >>6674652 This clown world will only get clownier unless there's a new world war to cleanse the paradigm through mass trauma.

Anonymous Fri May 26 21:40:19 2023 No.6674675
File: 113 KB, 717x717, 1671751099583764.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>6674594
My patience with trannies have finally snapped and I will gladly tell them to increase the 41%.

>>6674632
>all I had growing up was paper, pencil and a shitty webcam
Fuck off.

>>	Anonymous Fri May 26 21:42:08 2023 No.6674680 >>6674660 hear me out, maybe people want AI art because they don't actually like (you)rs?

>>	Anonymous Fri May 26 21:42:51 2023 No.6674683 >>6674649 8/10, got me good.

Anonymous Fri May 26 22:01:24 2023 No.6674715

>>6674632
What creative potential? They will literally never be able to develop their own style or their own take because at the end of the day all they are doing is prompting and praying. They can add all the positive or negative inputs they want, but they are still rolling the dice at the end of the day. "Reach their creative potential" my fucking ass.

>>	Anonymous Fri May 26 22:07:30 2023 No.6674724 File: 178 KB, 990x646, gravedigger.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] Everything in Nikke is obviously AI generated yet people still play that shit

>>	Anonymous Fri May 26 22:09:38 2023 No.6674729 >>6674724 quick rundown? is this true?

>>	Anonymous Fri May 26 22:19:03 2023 No.6674745 >>6674729 No

>>	Anonymous Fri May 26 22:26:32 2023 No.6674753 >>6674551 Yeah but if I need to furnish 10 apartments I'm not gonna wait around for Joe to make me 50 bespoke chairs, I'm going to IKEA.

>>	Anonymous Fri May 26 22:26:39 2023 No.6674755 Inevitable

>>	Anonymous Fri May 26 22:28:51 2023 No.6674759 >>6674729 no

>>	Anonymous Fri May 26 22:34:21 2023 No.6674765 File: 900 KB, 876x580, file.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6674715 >he doesnt even know you can create models for a style now get with the program bro, this isn't 2022 anymore

>>	Anonymous Fri May 26 22:36:09 2023 No.6674771 >>6674765 You don’t get it. All the data AI uses comes from other artists, meaning the people prompting will never have their own anything.

>>	Anonymous Fri May 26 22:38:14 2023 No.6674776 >>6674771 He's either baiting or genuinely retarded, don't bother

>>	Anonymous Fri May 26 22:38:22 2023 No.6674777 >>6674771 what if you combined artstyles into something unique, like every human artist ever does?

>>	Anonymous Fri May 26 22:38:30 2023 No.6674779 >>6674771 it's a cogito, ergo sum type of situation, if they think it's there's then it is.

>>	Anonymous Fri May 26 22:40:45 2023 No.6674785 >>6674771 Prove my art is AI. No, "it seems like it is to me" does not suffice.

Anonymous Fri May 26 22:42:45 2023 No.6674790
File: 36 KB, 515x536, 1655412776363162.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

Retard GOD here.
If an AI used to sell [product] was trained on an artist's artstyle and it clearly shows, what's stopping the artist to sue them and have them show how the AI was trained?
Unless of course, the product is chink.

Anonymous Fri May 26 22:42:58 2023 No.6674792
File: 1.32 MB, 220x220, 1683764478286517.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>dude? [artist style] + [other artist style]?!!
>what if we, like... mix Deadpool and Pokemon? that'd be so EPIC
>what if... wes anderson + lotr?!! im pogging
Always remember that this is AIfaggot's definition of "creativity"

>>	Anonymous Fri May 26 22:43:01 2023 No.6674793 >>6674777 That would require taste.

>>	Anonymous Fri May 26 22:43:26 2023 No.6674794 >>6674777 Humans don’t go into an artist’s gallery (hard drive in most cases) or pick the zeroes and ones out of their monitors and rearrange the stolen data.

>>	Anonymous Fri May 26 22:44:10 2023 No.6674797 File: 10 KB, 527x571, CUDDLESHURT.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] aaaaaaaaaaaa...

Anonymous Fri May 26 22:45:50 2023 No.6674804

>>6674790
Takedown notices can be effective but actually suing someone is a pain in the ass, it costs a lot of money and time.
Also you need to give it a few months for lawmakers to clearly state that putting copyrighted shit in a dataset is an infringement. It's going to happen soon, in spite of what screeching g/iggers would like you to believe.

>>	Anonymous Fri May 26 22:45:52 2023 No.6674805 >that feeling when your AI art passes as handmade feels good man

>>	Anonymous Fri May 26 22:47:02 2023 No.6674807 >>6674792 t. brainlet

>>	Anonymous Fri May 26 22:47:15 2023 No.6674808 File: 42 KB, 640x396, 1548103338063.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >prove that I'm not actually a woman. No, "it seems like it is to me" does not suffice.

>>	Anonymous Fri May 26 22:47:40 2023 No.6674810 File: 77 KB, 1030x476, 1668047201821807.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6674805 >passes Slippery slope friend. Today, AI art, tomorrow... Who knows.

Anonymous Fri May 26 22:48:50 2023 No.6674812

>>6674785
1. AI generated images are not art. Art is only made by humans.

2. I don’t need to prove anything, and you’ll never be able to prove that you have even a remote ability to make art. You’ll never be able to tell someone to their face, “I make art.” And if you tried to tell them, “I’m an AI artist” they would laugh in your face.

>>	Anonymous Fri May 26 22:49:31 2023 No.6674813 File: 42 KB, 410x480, 1588840244809.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6674807 but bro what if... what if... [franchise] except its balenciaga?!! what if... this 90s character... except grimdark? holy shit my creativity is unleashed

>>	Anonymous Fri May 26 22:53:06 2023 No.6674814 >>6674812 >You’ll never be able to tell someone to their face, “I make art.” Sure I can. I use tools to create art: I am an artist. One of those tools is AI: I am an artist. Deal with it.

Anonymous Fri May 26 22:54:26 2023 No.6674818

>>6674814
Why do you even want to be classified as "an artist" so badly anyway? I personally think that any bloke who films themselves taking a shit could be classified as an artist so what's with the desire? Is this something you really look up to or want to be?

>>	Anonymous Fri May 26 22:55:08 2023 No.6674820 >>6674438 Professionals have been using it to cheat too. Be skeptical of any artists who's style changed suddenly in october of 2022 https://twitter.com/pomujoynet1/status/1661539327338496000

>>	Anonymous Fri May 26 22:55:13 2023 No.6674821 >why yes I do own a factory. I am an artisan, how could you tell?

>>	Anonymous Fri May 26 22:55:14 2023 No.6674822 File: 214 KB, 900x1370, d43585u-144a24b9-d7ac-4876-bfd3-60203038aa88.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6674813 What if Girls... PLUS ROBOTS >this isn't creative to the highly discerning critic posting on a 99% anime board

>>	Anonymous Fri May 26 22:55:37 2023 No.6674824 >>6674813 get this, I'm about to blow your mind, what if girl but with big tits?

>>	Anonymous Fri May 26 22:56:14 2023 No.6674825 >>6674814 Nope. That’s like fucking a woman with a strap-on and telling her it’s your cock doing the work. And by the way, you’ll never impress a woman by telling her you prompt AI images. Kek. You’re a living joke.

>>	Anonymous Fri May 26 22:56:24 2023 No.6674826 File: 361 KB, 640x838, 1669284634078060.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6674822 >>6674824 so this... is the power... of idea guys...

>>	Anonymous Fri May 26 22:57:23 2023 No.6674827 >>6674818 You don’t actually think that. No one does.

>>	Anonymous Fri May 26 22:58:07 2023 No.6674829 >>6674813 They really ran those jokes into the ground.

>>	Anonymous Fri May 26 22:59:05 2023 No.6674833 [franchise here] as an 80s dark fantasy

Anonymous Fri May 26 22:59:31 2023 No.6674834

>>6674818
hi nta I just want to create and see cool art that I like to see and the neverending gatekeeping around what is art just leads to bans and blacklists

Like two days ago some guy used an AI VO of an existing voice actor in a free 20 second meme, and the actor sent their whole audience after them to doxx them and got them to erase their entire online existence and go into hiding.

>>	Anonymous Fri May 26 23:02:06 2023 No.6674842 >>6674826 Kek

Anonymous Fri May 26 23:03:13 2023 No.6674844

>>6674827
I totally do think that. I think art can be anything and anyone and I don't think it needs skill either. Granted guy filming himself shitting isn't a GOOD artist but if he is doing it for art he is just as much an artist as me. I don't care personally about being considered "an artist" because I think the label is a bit meaningless. I just care about gaining the skills.

>>6674834
I am totally behind pushing boundaries like that honestly. Though I am not understanding how that answers the question of why people want to be considered "an artist". Anyone can push boundaries.

>>	Anonymous Fri May 26 23:04:02 2023 No.6674846 bot thread

>>	Anonymous Fri May 26 23:04:22 2023 No.6674848 >>6674825 You can say whatever you'd like to make yourself feel better. I will continue making AI Art, and it will continue to pass, and I will continue to regard myself as an artist. Problem?

Anonymous Fri May 26 23:06:07 2023 No.6674851
File: 1.22 MB, 1232x1785, 1683916652682799.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

debating whether or not it's art has been pointless since Duchamp's antics a century ago
what's not pointless is making AI trannies understand how worthless they are, that they will never pass and that they are not wanted anywhere

>>	Anonymous Fri May 26 23:07:09 2023 No.6674852 File: 284 KB, 1214x793, 128375981754.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] AI art is real art. Transwomen are real women.

>>	Anonymous Fri May 26 23:08:32 2023 No.6674854 >>6674848 >AI Art not a thing >I will continue to regard myself as an artist. troon moment take your (You) and go

>>	Anonymous Fri May 26 23:09:32 2023 No.6674856 >>6674848 I feel good all the time because I’m an artist. I especially feel good when I look down at you for being a loser. Problem?

>>	Anonymous Fri May 26 23:22:58 2023 No.6674871 >>6674854 >>6674856 And yet AI still exists, even after your "scathing" anonymous comments. And it's only getting better. ;)

>>	Anonymous Fri May 26 23:25:29 2023 No.6674875 File: 101 KB, 1200x675, d4.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6674814 >I'm an artist >and >I'm a character designer >deal with it

>>	Anonymous Fri May 26 23:27:33 2023 No.6674877 >>6674871 AI can improve, you won’t. I’m only getting higher above you. ;)

>>	Anonymous Fri May 26 23:28:38 2023 No.6674879 >>6674871 You will never be an artist or a woman.

>>	Anonymous Fri May 26 23:32:52 2023 No.6674886 >>6674871 >trolling outside of /b/

>>	Anonymous Fri May 26 23:35:32 2023 No.6674890 File: 2.24 MB, 1920x1080, 1674693179461708.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] This filters the AItranny

Anonymous Fri May 26 23:43:05 2023 No.6674895

>>6674886
How is this trolling?
Just pointing out that no matter what's said in this tiny corner of the internet, AI art is still a thing, and it's still improving.
There's no putting it back in the box, but by all means continue personally attacking me if that helps you cope, I couldn't care less :)

>>	Anonymous Fri May 26 23:44:53 2023 No.6674898 >>6674895 You’re putting yourself into a box with the word ‘loser’ written on it, and there’s no taking you out of it.

>>	Anonymous Fri May 26 23:45:35 2023 No.6674901 >>6674895 sure you arent pa/g/eet

>>	Anonymous Fri May 26 23:48:57 2023 No.6674907 >samefag shill arrives to defend machine's honor >5PM PST Right on the dot

Anonymous Fri May 26 23:53:55 2023 No.6674916
File: 231 KB, 540x1727, 20230526_194056.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>6674777
The thing is even if a human tries as hard as they can to ape someone else's style, there will always be something distinct abouttheir own art. The way they make strokes, the way they perceive, the way they think. People can't help but be unique. When lerning from others a human will always add something of their own.

Image generators do not. They can only interpolate between imges in their dataset. They add nothing, everything that they're capable of outputting is fixed from the outset- all it would take for someone to "steal" your "work" is to get the combination of seed & prompts that you used. There is absolitely nothing unique about you or your "art". You can photobash a bunch of other artists' work all you want, but you won't add anything or have your own style.

Really, that's the limit of what image generators are capable of- photobashing and shooping. No, that's not literally how they work, I already understand that just fine you massive fAIggots- but the end result is in effect the same. The image of Sad Bench Keanu Reeves in a suit of armor that's been floating around here on /ic/ is a great example of this.
You will never be unique. You will never have a style. You will never be an artist. You're just a cog in the machine, a cipher, easily replaceable, with no value or voice of your own.

>>	Anonymous Fri May 26 23:59:10 2023 No.6674923 >>6674834 Based I won't stand for anything less than total AIgger death.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 00:03:06 2023 No.6674932 File: 2.31 MB, 2047x1025, 1684809834174313 (1).png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6674916 Here, I'll post it. Here's your originality and style, bro.

Anonymous Sat May 27 00:04:52 2023 No.6674937

>>6674916
>You will never be unique. You will never have a style. You will never be an artist. You're just a cog in the machine, a cipher, easily replaceable, with no value or voice of your own.
What do your boring opinions about someone you don't know have anything to do with the fact that AI art is now a permanent aspect of our cultural reality, that's improving by leaps and bounds over just a few short months.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 00:08:49 2023 No.6674943 >>6674937 Imagine replying to this mindless drone seriously.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 00:50:29 2023 No.6674990 >>6674805 so you admit that handmade art is the pinnacle and you're only a fraud engaging in deception?

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 00:52:31 2023 No.6674996 >>6674820 I'm skeptical of any artist who's not against this shit. almost every artist I follow (tens of them) are against it, the others are part of the same circles of artists

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 00:52:54 2023 No.6674999 >>6674937 >2 more weeks

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 00:57:54 2023 No.6675007 What will you do when it improves to the point of being undetectable?

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 00:59:21 2023 No.6675010 >>6674363 >Adapt Idk man, it just seems like you go straight to losing your job no matter what.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 01:00:50 2023 No.6675012 >>6674895 >There's no putting it back in the box we can put you in a box, however

Anonymous Sat May 27 01:03:12 2023 No.6675016

>>6675007
I will demand proof that the artist I'm commissioning is a real artist, maybe ask for recording part of the process. I will also hate AIfags even harder because they'll obviously try to pass as real artists with it, and this will relegate them to being nothing more than notorious dishonest frauds

Anonymous Sat May 27 01:05:28 2023 No.6675019
File: 163 KB, 1000x1418, Project 202305210412.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>6674937
>you are worthless and replaceable- and here's why that's a good thing!
Begone from this place, bug creature. I will continue to draw, and to perceive and feel things beyond the scope of your untrained mind.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 01:05:49 2023 No.6675020 >>6675007 Imagine going to a pizzeria and being served pre cooked shit from the supermarket, while lying it was made from scratch.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 01:07:41 2023 No.6675021 >>6675007 >what will you do when gender reassignment surger improves to the point of trans women being undetectable, huh, chud?

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 01:13:43 2023 No.6675027 File: 1.88 MB, 1144x1092, 1657422940225670.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >it's ANOTHER ai thread

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 01:14:47 2023 No.6675028 File: 619 KB, 2048x1536, 1658193658489951.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6675007 Real artists will just go full tradchad

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 01:19:20 2023 No.6675032 >>6675028 prompt?

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 01:21:08 2023 No.6675034 >>6674792 The funny thing is that proompters aren't even making the shit you listed. They're making dime a dozen anime pinups instesd

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 01:21:36 2023 No.6675035 >>6675028 looks like AI art

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 01:22:49 2023 No.6675037 >>6674388 >tfw am a muralist and feel sick to my stomach reading this sociopath

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 01:29:00 2023 No.6675042 >>6675028 I love this artist so much. Maybe I should learn how to use alcohol markers.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 01:32:51 2023 No.6675050 >>6674341 >19.7k likes and 3 replies bot

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 01:37:46 2023 No.6675057 >>6675027 >it's ANOTHER automated textile equipment thread

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 01:39:30 2023 No.6675060 >>6675028 artist name?

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 01:40:22 2023 No.6675061 File: 155 KB, 448x448, 1613623378017.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6674834 >the actor sent their whole audience after them to doxx them and got them to erase their entire online existence and go into hiding

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 01:40:34 2023 No.6675062 >>6675028 >messed up hands stable diffusion

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 01:41:24 2023 No.6675065 >>6675060 https://twitter.com/shiratamaha

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 01:41:58 2023 No.6675066 >>6674834 Holy based, get fucked you leeches

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 01:43:31 2023 No.6675068 >>6674834 Good warning to AIfags using these tools They could've easily used his voice to create something with malicious intent

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 01:46:58 2023 No.6675072 File: 600 KB, 1284x1199, IMG_1552.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] This thread again? AI is killing jobs, just accept it and be better by making your workflow easier

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 01:50:01 2023 No.6675077 >>6675072 false, i got a artist friend who's got double patreon after AI shit started because now he knows he is worth much more than the flood of garbage.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 01:54:39 2023 No.6675086 >>6674834 good, I hope they piss through his letter box

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 01:54:49 2023 No.6675088 >>6674363 3D models were a mistake. I'm glad faggots who used them as a crutch for art are now paying the consequences.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 02:00:20 2023 No.6675093 You guys who are so anti-AI, have you even tried it? it's honestly kind of fun, and there's a lot of expressive possibility in how you set up img2img, the various prompts you use, and so on. I'm slowly coming around to it, I have to admit.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 02:05:19 2023 No.6675098 >>6675093 have you tried butt chugging bleach?

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 02:05:27 2023 No.6675099 >>6675093 back to your circlejerk shithole where nobody gives a fuck about your generated shit pa/g/eet.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 02:08:45 2023 No.6675101 >>6675093 Have you tried drawing?

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 02:09:44 2023 No.6675103 >>6675101 It's too hard

Anonymous Sat May 27 02:10:55 2023 No.6675104

>>6674777
>He thinks that art comes only from bashing together art that you like.
This is why nothing worth remembering will come of using AI exclusively.

>"I take this chance to impress upon you, my reader, how important you really are in the whole art procedure. You, your personality, your individuality come first. your pictures are your by-product. everything about your pictures is, and should be, a little of you. They will be a reflection of your knowledge, your experiences, your observation, your likes and dislikes, your good taste, and your thinking. So the real concentration is centred on you, and your work follows along in the wake of what mental self-improvement you are making."

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 02:13:52 2023 No.6675110 >>6675093 I used to not mind ai, but the crossboard spamming is just plain tiring. It's been 8 months of this and you already know the type of reaction you're going to get on /ic/. Why continue this unless you're just trolling?

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 02:16:15 2023 No.6675113 >>6675110 They desperately want to fit and be accepted in art spaces lol

Anonymous Sat May 27 02:18:57 2023 No.6675116

>>6674834
Literally what is the societal good of being able to mimic somebody's voice with a pprogram. Are the "funny memes" and "dude they got the dead guy to voice the character again!" worth the endless potential for scamming, fucking people over, and general distrust that it will breed?

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 02:19:41 2023 No.6675118 >>6675113 They have entire threads on 10 different fucking boards dedicated to ai. /ic/ is literally the only board on 4chan that doesn't want to see it.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 02:21:47 2023 No.6675120 >>6675118 No one wants to see it besides to coomer boards. Even /g/ rebukes it, thats why the spam /ic/

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 02:22:52 2023 No.6675121 >>6675118 Should we make a containment thread? These endless threads about ai are boring.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 02:23:24 2023 No.6675122 Post your "art". Let's compare. Can you beat AI?

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 02:24:25 2023 No.6675123 >>6675121 >These endless threads about ai are boring. You guys love it, you watch like a hawk and comment every thread.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 02:24:50 2023 No.6675124 >>6675121 it will never stay contained. They need to shitpost about it in every thread to raise awareness to investors and grifters. /g/ has a general and they spam their garbage pretext and basic income bullshit all the time

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 02:26:10 2023 No.6675126 >>6674341 >cytus >a game about how technology and AI completely remove the emotion and soul of music >replaces their artists with AI it literally does not get more ironic than this. shame, i liked the cytus games too, they were good rhythm games.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 02:27:06 2023 No.6675127 /ic/isters...are we actually being replaced?

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 02:27:34 2023 No.6675128 >>6675126 Rayark has in been decline, they had a lot of bad press and this is a gamble to avoid bankruptcy. It will kill them, their success is only due to the art and music of their games and now they are killing it. Such is the fate of mobile

Anonymous Sat May 27 02:31:04 2023 No.6675133

>>6675128
still a shame
althought cytus 2 is what killed them for me
>buy to play mobile game
>99% of the content is locked behind song backs and paid content that isn't even remotely reasonably priced
fuck em to be honest, but the games still had a good core.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 02:31:11 2023 No.6675134 >>6675124 Yeah, I can see that happening. >>6675123 I literally just got here from the front page, schizo.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 02:32:59 2023 No.6675138 >>6675133 I dont have a say in this because I pirated Deemo and Cytus, but in hindsight, I guess it was deserved

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 02:35:34 2023 No.6675143 >>6675028 this guy made me want to get into copics badly but they're so damn expensive. im not confident in the things i draw yet to spend that much.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 02:39:21 2023 No.6675153 >>6675143 Use watercolor. Before copics mangaka mostly used watercolor when it came to colored pieces, copics are just quicker and easier but yeah they're expensive.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 02:42:25 2023 No.6675157 >>6675121 There's two containment threads on /aco, but they still spam it in other threads. When people call them out, they either ignore it or just give "u mad?" types of responses.

Anonymous Sat May 27 02:52:31 2023 No.6675181

Choose your violently anti-AI opinionated fighter

epik newgrounds meemer

toonboom tranny

c̵͈̥̝̃͐h̸̯̤͍͍̳̖͔̭̼̒̐̌̕̕͠į̴̣͕̖͓̪͂͆̎̏l̶̨̻̘̰̱̪̣̥̬͓̳͎̈̿̆̓͂̽͜͝͠d̴̡̼̫͔̟̞͚̎̌ ̸͉̮̣͕̤̪̰̼͈̣̀͆̄̂̒͐̄̕͘͘͜͝p̵̨̩̮̗͚͔͎͎͓͉̘̻̦̈͗̈́̈́̀͂͜ͅō̷̫͑̈́͘r̶͖͓̝̞̜̫͚͒̽̇̔̍̈́̒͌̃̑̎͑͠n̵̢͓͉̜̖̘͙̟͎̿͐̔̈́͗̐̋̓͆̚͝͝ ̴͈̮̠͚̠̠̐̌̃̂͂̋́̽̄͘̕͘͝͝t̷̞͙̯̼̟͚̼̜̥̟̀̈́̀̎̌̍̍́͝ͅͅͅr̶̨̨̮̖̣̠̪̮̭͍͂̎́͑̇̈́̒͝ą̵̧̳͕̟̗̼̳̖̮͆̎̾̈́͌͌͗͐́̕͜c̶̛̝̠͇͔̖͖͜ͅḙ̵̢͕̦͋̾͆͂̕͜͝ř̴̡̡̛̦̰̹̪̯͓̖̝̰̹̆̒͆̿̀͐̓̾̈́͛́̆

2HB pencil portrait guy

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 02:58:55 2023 No.6675192 >>6674506 >F-Droid Any nice drawing programs for Android? I was considering Ibis Paint X. Might get a new phone soon, so I would like to get pen as well and use the old one for sketching.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 03:02:53 2023 No.6675197 >>6675127 yes but there will still be value in people who can clean up extra fingers and weird eyes in photoshop

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 03:04:11 2023 No.6675198 >>6675197 third worlders can easily do that for cents

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 03:04:14 2023 No.6675199 >>6675034 Mixing styles would required deliberate work to pick certain traits of the styles, but AI can't do that.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 03:11:14 2023 No.6675202 >>6675181 playable boss: coom renderer pinoy

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 03:14:26 2023 No.6675204 File: 878 KB, 1197x1617, 279dc13a-5239-4baf-b3e0-37dd943d4e72.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] Guess what, inkcels? It doesn't need to be perfect. It doesn't even need to be as good as you. It just needs to be good enough to get the job done.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 03:20:20 2023 No.6675209 >>6675127 In 10 years we will be (who can draw) in same league as theater actors, orchestra musicians while AI generated content will be for faggots who watch Netflix and listen K-POP.

Anonymous Sat May 27 03:27:30 2023 No.6675215

To those who are saying, "Oh, but the art is stiff," "the face is wonky," "the anatomy is this and that," don't you realize we are literally in year 1 of this journey? You are all witnessing the outcome of a child's effort and evaluating it as if it were the work of a master with 10,000 hours of experience. Just wait a few more years when it will be possible to create an entire manga based on your own art or someone else's, or even animate your own anime. The future is shit but this will be great.

Anonymous Sat May 27 04:17:19 2023 No.6675252
File: 142 KB, 1283x933, promptcuck.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>6675215
>>6675204
AIcucks not only not understand how this technology is at the very core completely dependent on inputted human art to shit out new concepts, they keep memoryholing every time they get BTFO and repeat their NPC script and shitty techfag marketing over and over and over again

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 04:20:17 2023 No.6675253 >>6675122 >Post your "art". Let's compare. Can you beat the artists whose work was stolen

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 04:22:01 2023 No.6675254 But what AIcucks don't realize is that I can draw doodles on whiteboards and stickynotes that entertain girls and as a result get my dick sucked

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 04:23:43 2023 No.6675255 >>6675122 Nobody here draws.

Anonymous Sat May 27 04:43:36 2023 No.6675268

>>6675198
>>6675197
What a Wonderful future, real artists post their work so civitai and huggingfarts retards can use their art as data to push out a new picture shitters that thirdworlders will use to churn out $2 commissions, while the original artist will get nothing.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 04:44:29 2023 No.6675269 >using inkcel as a insult on /ic/ hilarious obvious bait

Anonymous Sat May 27 04:45:21 2023 No.6675270

>>6675192
I use Artflow and Medibang, myself. Artflow because tge interface is goid and the brush engine does what I need, Medibang for the 8-bit and 1-bit layer modes (which includes the ability to paint in halftone/screentone).
I keep Medibang gated behind a firewall to block their stupid ads that you can only get rid of by paying a monthly subscription. Used to be you could pay them once to get rid of ads and unlock certain features like the file browser but not any more. I'd get a cracked .apk if I knew where to get one that wouldn't give my droid devices AIDS. Screw that monthly subscription garbage.
My best bit of advice: get the Rethink DNS + Firewall app, it lets you keep other apps isolated so that they can't connect to the internet or even know that the internet's on to begin with.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 05:01:15 2023 No.6675281 >>6675093 i tried it and got bored of it really quickly. went back to drawing.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 05:06:00 2023 No.6675283 >shitty mobile game company uses AI >no one cares >will probably go bankrupt after this because not even mobilefags wanna pay for AI shit How is this a loss for us?

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 05:53:56 2023 No.6675317 >>6675093 cannot in good faith post something built upon stolen effort. The most moral way to use it would be to create a lora with my works but that's objetively asking for stagnation

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 05:59:56 2023 No.6675325 File: 376 KB, 1080x1377, Transart.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 06:07:44 2023 No.6675329 >>6675325 What's even funnier is that AI troons try to pass as actual artists lmao.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 06:07:56 2023 No.6675330 >>6674359 >and virtually no one knows who the fuck they are huh?

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 06:22:05 2023 No.6675344 what's the fun of things if computers are doing it? i can't even put into words how soulless it is to let bots and programs do music, art, and writing for us.

Anonymous Sat May 27 06:27:34 2023 No.6675348

>>6675344
In business perspective, It's always better if they can reduce fund while increasing quantities. As long as there are a product, they can find a way to sell it.
This same mentality that led to the history of Black Friday
They forgot the purpose of their product. It's like hosting a game tournament and let bots compete with each other.

Anonymous Sat May 27 06:34:44 2023 No.6675354

>>6675348
>They forgot the purpose of their product.
This is so on spot. Their first success on mobile was literally known for good art and music.
They fucked the recent releases because they went full mobile garbage and its fully showing now.
Its a desperate CEO buying nfts to keep a sad company afloat.

Anonymous Sat May 27 07:58:49 2023 No.6675415
File: 47 KB, 655x227, 12385091415.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>6675116
There is nothing to be gained except dynamic NPC voices in vidya.
All AI faggots found so far was memes, scams and pissing on people's tombs. Wow! You can have a digital skincrawler emulating your loved ones soon! We can emulate celebs for ever!
It's obvious that nothing good will ever come out of this garbage.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 08:05:13 2023 No.6675422 >>6675415 Are AIschizos even human? I'm fully convinced theyr are some species of bug people that have learnt to pretend like they feel or have values.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 08:20:37 2023 No.6675435 File: 57 KB, 450x675, 159487.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6675344 the fun is in the enjoyment of the things you actually see and hear coming out of AI, something that's instantly obvious to everyone except /ic/ cope spiraling

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 08:25:02 2023 No.6675439 I don't even like AI all that much but the cope from artists is pathetic such arrogant pride at being ignorant/tech illiterate

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 08:26:31 2023 No.6675441 >>6675439 It's funny because tech ni/g/g/ers don't know shit about what art is all about.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 08:27:50 2023 No.6675443 >>6674516 you idiot think AI can't replicate any other style. This shit will literally kill art

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 08:30:19 2023 No.6675448 >>6675435 >doing gacha rolls is fun

Anonymous Sat May 27 08:31:20 2023 No.6675450

>>6675443
Nearly every single time an AIfag showed me an example of AI "replicating a style" I could almost tell from the thumbnail alone that it was done by AI, the sterile white light always gives it away even in pieces that are supposed to look warmer. It's always mixed with diffusion vomit. Even the more decent looking ones like that trash posted earlier falls apart upon closer inspection.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 08:33:28 2023 No.6675452 >>6675439 You guys act like tech is something beyond our capabilities to ever understand. You literally sound like a 16yo who insists that his poems are 2deep4u.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 08:34:21 2023 No.6675453 >>6675448 Seeing something looks good is fun.

Anonymous Sat May 27 08:36:16 2023 No.6675455

>>6675439
>implying promptniggers know anything about actual machine learning
Only the people who develop the models have any technical know how. Promptniggers pay a subscription to commission an algorithm to draw pictures for them. Anyone who is employed in the actual making of AI art and not the models is the most talentless, low skill and replaceable worker in existence. The fact that actually think they are ahead of the game somehow is embarassing. They are not artists. They are not programmers. They are lower than Indian call centre workers since at least they have to communicate with people.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 08:36:55 2023 No.6675457 File: 220 KB, 297x363, 40109310698.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6675453 (you) must not be having a lot of fun then

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 08:39:52 2023 No.6675459 >>6675455 yeah I'm not reading all that

Anonymous Sat May 27 08:41:03 2023 No.6675461
File: 159 KB, 1024x1536, 05395-549310520-1girldeathreaperweapon2b64941e57c46647aef1d1bb8989ecf199b498b0.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>6675457
here comes the cope spiraling, "AI Art doesn't look good" even though artists are literally shitting themselves saying they'll be replaced because it looks too good

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 08:43:00 2023 No.6675463 >>6675453 cuck mentality

Anonymous Sat May 27 08:44:42 2023 No.6675464

>>6675453
Something only a zoomer with fried dopamine receptors could say. Pressing generate over and over is the most mind-numbing shit I have ever experienced in my life and I can’t fathom how anyone can spend more than 5 minutes on this shit if they’re not severely autistic or needing the dopamine hit like an addict.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 08:45:05 2023 No.6675465 >>6675461 Counterpoint: the vast majority of people have subhuman taste and are willing to settle for "good enough". You're the living proof of that!

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 08:46:01 2023 No.6675470 >>6675459 >AIfags can't focus enough to read three lines Literally cannot make this up

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 08:48:19 2023 No.6675475 >>6675470 >artist sees no value in saving time because he's unemployed Of course

Anonymous Sat May 27 08:49:47 2023 No.6675480
File: 309 KB, 637x367, Screen-Shot-2019-06-17-at-4.18.28-PM.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>6675465
Wow dude, stunning and brave. I'm sure you must have drawn some very abnormal things that really push the boundaries of art, care to share with the class?

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 08:49:54 2023 No.6675481 >>6675475 Yet here you are on 4chan on /ic/ of all places

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 08:51:56 2023 No.6675482 >>6675475 I'm literally a Comp Sci major who is studying machine learning. I know how promptniggers function. Don't pretend like you bring any value whatsoever to the market. You are the modern equivalent of a janitor.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 08:52:29 2023 No.6675483 >>6675482 Sure sure, keep being a smug little bohemian layabout, things will work out

Anonymous Sat May 27 08:59:14 2023 No.6675490
File: 18 KB, 600x450, 72c.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>6675483
I have the skills needed for the modern market and the intelligence to know that people who need my skills are soulless bugmen. I will thrive and be able to pursue my passions. You, my promptnigger friend, will be lucky to find a minimum wage job touching up AI gachashit.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 08:59:45 2023 No.6675492 >>6675490 >I actually happen to be an expert in this field I got mad about few posts earlier Nobody is buying this shit.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 09:00:51 2023 No.6675493 >>6675435 Holy shit, those legs are grotesque.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 09:02:40 2023 No.6675494 >>6675439 >How do you do fellow artists?

Anonymous Sat May 27 09:02:42 2023 No.6675495

>>6675492
My father has the business sense to put me in a profitable field even though I hated it. I'm thankful in the long run. I believe AI Art is an impressive feat of programming. But I also believe those who use it are retards inclined to the lowest level of goyslop.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 09:03:46 2023 No.6675497 >>6675495 that doesn't explain your meltdown from earlier

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 09:04:46 2023 No.6675498 >>6675480 >posts something an actual artist made What's wrong? AI not good enough?

Anonymous Sat May 27 09:07:04 2023 No.6675500
File: 283 KB, 598x568, 1675889541615231.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

why are you guys wasting your time replying to this tranny
over at /g/ they have threads to make fun of "artfag cope", they're tourists only here to get a rise out of you to troll or fuel their schadenfreude complex. the Ai shit he posted probably isn't even his
they are only pretending to act retarded and if they're not acting then it's even more pointless to argue with brainwashed NPCs on 4channel of all places
if you're going to do anything more then call them a trannoid then don't bother

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 09:07:19 2023 No.6675501 >>6675497 You didn't even read what I said. Its three fucking lines. I don't think that's a shockingly large amount to type or read. But I'm dealing with an AIschizo so who knows maybe you need some Subway Surfers gameplay to get through it.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 09:10:04 2023 No.6675504 >>6675475 >t. watches TV shows sped up three times

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 09:11:34 2023 No.6675506 >>6675504 >my sissified angry outburst at internet anons have as much value and merit as TV shows Lol

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 09:13:15 2023 No.6675508 >>6675506 >didn't even deny it

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 09:13:27 2023 No.6675509 >>6675501 >>6675508 >arrogantly proud for not understanding computers >arrogantly believing his words are too important to ignore or glaze over There's no reason for you to be this stuck up

Anonymous Sat May 27 09:15:29 2023 No.6675510

>>6675508
You: claim that skipping posts is the same as speeding through shows
I respond by saying your posts aren't as fun as watching shows.
There is therefore an obvious implication that I don't speed through shows.
You don't catch this implication, proving that you are retarded.
You also thought this is a critical blow, proving that you're angry and also deeply invested in this little spat. That's pretty funny

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 09:16:28 2023 No.6675511 >>6675509 Tranny.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 09:17:37 2023 No.6675512 >>6675511 and I'm Anon nice to meet you

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 09:18:35 2023 No.6675513 >>6675510 You are the very same kind of bug person who would speed watch shows given the chance.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 09:18:53 2023 No.6675514 >>6675509 If you can keep this argument going you can read three lines, you ADHD promptnigger. You can spare half a minute of your day that you use to generate cuckold hentai

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 09:19:06 2023 No.6675515 >>6675513 Your words and assumptions mean nothing, and I'm sorry I upset you this much

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 09:19:35 2023 No.6675516 >>6675512 You will never be a woman.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 09:20:22 2023 No.6675517 >>6675514 What makes you think I prompt? Literally the first words in the thread (that you got mad at) was that I don't like AI all that much. You got this mad over me saying that artists cope too hard which only proved my original point lmao

Anonymous Sat May 27 09:20:38 2023 No.6675518
File: 350 KB, 1280x897, 00022-1804971930.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>6675498
if an AI made this your responses would be:

>AI doesnt even know cats don't have eyeballs in their mouth
>AI had to interpolate it between and infinite number of pictures of cats and eyeballs
and
>Actually, it doesn't look creative, lol, it's just eyeballs in a cat

it's a choose your own cope adventure

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 09:21:13 2023 No.6675519 >>6675515 You can make it up to me by killing yourself. Maybe you can do it in a creative way for once like drowning in a tub of s.oylent.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 09:22:09 2023 No.6675522 File: 35 KB, 500x432, 1666653033910519.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >I don't like AI but artists are retarded about it >HOW DARE YOU SAY THAT meltdown wew

Anonymous Sat May 27 09:23:30 2023 No.6675523

>>6675517
That seems like a pretty obvious lie and even if it wasn't I'm simply asking you to understand how low the position of promptniggers in the future market would actually be. Using AI Art isn't a sign of technical know how its just a sign of laziness and having no talent.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 09:23:40 2023 No.6675525 >>6675518 >I could never match the skill and creativity of Junji Ito Admission is the first step.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 09:24:41 2023 No.6675527 >>6675517 You're a lying faggot false flagger and you know it.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 09:24:57 2023 No.6675528 >>6675523 You know what's an obvious lie? >actually I'm a software engineer with 300 confirmed softwares and I know everything about machine learning (in this thread about machine learning where I got mad at)

Anonymous Sat May 27 09:27:26 2023 No.6675531

>>6675518
Those are all good arguments. If an AInigger made it there is no absolutely no value in it because the technical skill that made it impressive is non existent. Those careful ink lines the number strands of hair the look in the cats eye. They all happened to be shat out by a program. It's the same way a photo of a cat is not as impressive as a drawing of one. AIfags are like photographers who are too lazy to even leave their home and find something pretty looking.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 09:28:40 2023 No.6675533 >>6675525 What if a person came up with the exact image, theme, and composition, but used AI to create the picture? What would your cope be?

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 09:29:42 2023 No.6675534 >>6675531 >the only, sole value in art is the technical skill required I guess giant minecraft builds are peak art

Anonymous Sat May 27 09:31:58 2023 No.6675535

>>6675528
I am mad at people who use machine learning in art and think they bring anything of worth. And I never claimed I was some expert software hackerman. All I said is I'm a Comp Sci major who takes courses in machine learning since you are suggesting I'm only worried for my profession.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 09:33:14 2023 No.6675536 >>6675535 actually I was just mocking you for getting angry for not reading your gay post

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 09:33:33 2023 No.6675537 >>6675533 >what if next you gonna say 2 more weeks >>6675534 better art than ai slop

Anonymous Sat May 27 09:34:58 2023 No.6675538

>>6675534
Minecraft builds do not require the most amount of technical skill so I'm not sure what you mean by this. They are time consuming sure but most of them are just recreating existing photographs and tracing over them. It still takes a decent amount of skill though and they are leagues and bounds above even many low tier artists much less AIfags.

Anonymous Sat May 27 09:40:27 2023 No.6675543

>>6675533
They are admitting they are too lazy to actually learn to express this with conventional tools and therefore have no talent. I'm not sure what point you're trying to make here. If I say "Hmm a drawing of Tomie with her hair stretched out like a cylinder of tentacles with her shadow looming over a kid in the centre would look really cool." that does not mean I have talent. That means I had an idea. If I cannot express an idea without commissioning someone else then I am a hack.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 09:43:03 2023 No.6675546 >>6675536 You've switched what you were actually doing apparently like thrice already. Though I guess its likely you forgot what you were discussing yourself given your attention span.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 09:44:51 2023 No.6675547 File: 565 KB, 512x512, ywon9584i8g91.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6675537 >Another "It doesn't look good" argument it never ends

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 09:46:36 2023 No.6675549 >>6675077 Independent artists who do their own business and marketing will do better but wagecucks who beg for companies to hire them will do worse. You can't get fired if you're your own boss.

Anonymous Sat May 27 09:50:08 2023 No.6675552

>>6675547
This image is uncanny as fuck. Therefore it would only be impressive if an actual artist had the skills to draw those super uneven ugly strokes that perfectly replicate the half formed draftsmanship of an AI. If an AI made this then the impressive thing about it is gone.

Anonymous Sat May 27 09:54:48 2023 No.6675555

>>6675547
Neverending is your thirst for yous, so I'll feed you some more.
It doesn't matter how it looks. It doesn't matter how fast it's made. It's not made by human. It will never be an art. And you can dance around playing with terminology and rhetoric, with your le smart le trolling reasons and arguments about muh prompt muh words input. A lie will always remain a lie.
Bon appetite, don't choke on it.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 09:56:02 2023 No.6675557 AItards said they don't need validation yet still come here everyday like a starved whore. Did circle jerking with your fellow bugmens is becoming too stale?

Anonymous Sat May 27 10:05:23 2023 No.6675562
File: 158 KB, 870x1044, 00018.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>6675552
>>6675555
This is a fun idealistic view and all but most people don't actually think in terms of what about the effort, the humanity, the etc etc external factors, they think about the art and how appealing it is overall.

If all you have is "it's made by humans, therefore better", and don't have quality or soul or appeal or at least SOME reason to be liked, you will get replaced

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 10:10:26 2023 No.6675564 File: 60 KB, 598x228, 56789786234456.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6674341 that's it folks... I'm going back to the countryside and farm onions

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 10:20:43 2023 No.6675575 >>6675518 my response is: your art gacha machine can only work stealing the effort of millions of artists dead and alive so i can just call you a thieving parasite and you'll know deep down in your goy cattle soul that it's true.

Anonymous Sat May 27 10:37:27 2023 No.6675589

>>6675562
i'm sure many have told you before that its soulless, but you dont have a soul to understand it.
If all I have is "A human made it", its already leagues better than whatever machine vomit you generate.
And thats why you will fail and nobody is getting replaced except the bottom of the barrel, no matter how much you fix your uncanny interpolation machine, because all you see colored pixels and a product to be sold.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 10:43:48 2023 No.6675594 File: 189 KB, 1024x1536, 00106-509893955.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6675589 >If all I have is "A human made it", its already leagues better than whatever machine vomit you generate. Source: Your opinion have fun being replaced

Anonymous Sat May 27 10:48:13 2023 No.6675597
File: 82 KB, 149x203, 1682989208122411.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>6675594
Source: You are banned from and all legit art sites have filters to ignore your trash. The fact that you try so hard to dodge those filters tells a lot about your "art"

Have fun coping and posting more garbage nobody gives a shit about
I'm giving you free (you)s for your retardation because thread is dead, but this is the last

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 10:50:02 2023 No.6675598 >>6675594 nta but you are deluded if you think the perceived value of an AI piece drops when someone learns it is. >have fun getting replaced AI is stacking up Ls lately, only bug companies try to exploit it, most deem it too toxic to risk

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 10:51:16 2023 No.6675599 >>6675594 lol hands & eyes

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 10:52:51 2023 No.6675603 >>6675598 It definitely does, but I don't think most people care enough for it to be anything dealbreaking or enjoyment ruining in even close to the level the soul-soulless crowd thinks it does

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 10:58:15 2023 No.6675607 >>6675603 >but I don't think most people care enough for it to be anything dealbreaking or enjoyment ruining you'd be surprised. it's already been spammed too much

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 11:00:05 2023 No.6675608 >>6675594 Aitards keep screaming adapt or die but keeps making fake wips trying to pass as a real artist. you fuckers are so fucking retarded that you can't even admit that you do use image generator.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 11:03:23 2023 No.6675612 >>6675564 >>6675605

Anonymous Sat May 27 11:03:24 2023 No.6675613

>>6675607
That just sounds like art fatigue to me, I dont think you can keep browsing pixiv or your twitter feed even for a top tier manga artist for hours and hours and not get bored at some point. The only thing that prevented that was that artists have long schedules and upload occasionally.

Maybe your engagement with it should be occasional instead of "more art more art I want to see more more more more AI all the time" and instantly burn yourself out

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 11:09:08 2023 No.6675620 >>6675613 >art

Anonymous Sat May 27 11:12:11 2023 No.6675622

>>6675612
until any westerner can take your manga/anime, run it through an AI and sell it for pennies. thinking it brings nothing but unhealthy competition is stupid. and by unhealthy I mean a bunch of backstabbers who will jump and exploit whenever someone makes a modicum of effort, it's parasitic

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 11:12:51 2023 No.6675623 Can you retards stop replying to bait? Let these retards falseflag at each other and leave it at that.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 11:16:47 2023 No.6675626 >>6674632 Nice bait

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 11:19:39 2023 No.6675628 File: 327 KB, 701x782, 7203B99D-C2A8-4D46-8516-4595CC59A330.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

Anonymous Sat May 27 11:23:18 2023 No.6675632

How would you feel if you played and enjoyed a game, then later found out the art was 80% AI?

Would it bother you, like you were tricked into looking at it? Or it wouldn't, because you enjoyed the game?
I'm a gamedev, right now I'm not saying anything about my use of AI art while things are unsettled.

Anonymous Sat May 27 11:35:13 2023 No.6675634

>>6675632
People would be angry being lied too. A pizzeria lying about making their pizza from scratch and using pre cooked shit from a super market, a tranny lying about being trans or hiding it at the last second when dating, being lied to about eating food that’s not vegan, etc. People don’t like being lied or tricked and no surprised you will get shit for it, ai shitter

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 11:39:12 2023 No.6675636 >>6675623 > he said replying to another pepe-thread

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 11:44:22 2023 No.6675639 >>6675632 I would be super happy, progress is the only way forward, enough of these "people" holding us back, stand tall and proud and use AI art publicly without fear for you're on the right side of history.

Anonymous Sat May 27 11:54:14 2023 No.6675649

>>6675632
It would definitelly challenge my preconceptions.
But that's a hypotethical question, because I do not think anything worthwile will ever be made with AI. If I see anything in the trailer or shop page of that game featuring your typical pinup AI trash then I will not even play that game. If the person behind it used AI to make visuals, what tells me he didn't also use AI for writing? I don't want to engage with bootleg art, I want to see someone's vision come to life. And I mean their own vision, tempered through the creativity required to make things work under the limitations they have to work with, not filtered through computer vomit.
>I'm a gamedev, right now I'm not saying anything about my use of AI art while things are unsettled.
I'm assuming you're indie. Everyone is jumping on the bandwagon. I think it could be useful for you to make generic backgrounds if you need some for example, but if you use it for the majority of your game art then you'll just get lost in the sea of slop that everyone is already pushing. Think of all the indie games that blew up, they all have a distinct visual style that isn't necessarily technically advanced. Despite what /g/trannies wish you to believe, AI cannot do that, at most you can make bootleg of another game's style and that's what your own game will come off as.

Anonymous Sat May 27 11:55:03 2023 No.6675650

>>6675632
The most important thing to understand is that if you haven't broken any laws, you don't have to defend yourself. If someone asks if you used AI art, you ignore them. If someone blames you for using AI art, you ignore them. The only way this thing escalates is if you admit guilt (even though you haven't done anything wrong), or if you start to argue with these people. You are not legally obligated to disclose trade secrets or what tools you used to make your game. If people see AI art, a small portion of them may choose to not play your game, but it will not escalate into a woke twitter cancelfest.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 12:02:58 2023 No.6675657 >>6675270 Thanks!

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 12:06:18 2023 No.6675658 >>6675415 >record your relatives >glownigger backdoor is used to steal the data >someones pretends to be your relative to scam you nice

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 12:06:32 2023 No.6675659 File: 315 KB, 586x634, 1551691506708.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6675650 >you haven't broken any laws yet tick tock, AI tranny

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 12:20:02 2023 No.6675670 >>6675632 >then later found out this is "what if you date a tranny and later found out its a guy" energy. Everyone can tell you're a tranny IRL.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 12:37:32 2023 No.6675680 >>6675670 No one's mentioned AI so far, and I've even gotten some compliments on my art :)

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 12:38:55 2023 No.6675683 >6675680 >my art (You)

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 12:42:24 2023 No.6675686 >>6675680 Ai shitters support ai shitters. if you’re who i think it is, then you have no real followers, just bots.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 12:45:39 2023 No.6675691 >>6675680 >and then I woke up :)))

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 12:56:38 2023 No.6675698 >>6675632 The fact that you use AI will certainly come out in review pages. People will feel scammed if you don't disclose it.

Anonymous Sat May 27 13:32:32 2023 No.6675727

>>6675698
>The fact that you use AI will certainly come out in review pages.
If people want to try and slander me, they can come up with proof. Otherwise, sounds like some free drama publicity to me.

>amateur dev target of AI witch-hunt, cancel-culture strikes again

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 13:50:07 2023 No.6675757 >>6675727 You’re going have to come up with proof that you didn’t use ai, pajeet shitter. Good luck with that

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 13:50:47 2023 No.6675759 >>6675727 Selling people AI generated assets without disclosing it is an act of scamming by itself. Is not free publicity, you will get refunded genius.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 13:57:48 2023 No.6675771 >>6675757 I have no reason to prove myself against random wild accusations. Prove I used AI. Oh, except you can't. :)

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 14:02:06 2023 No.6675779 >>6675632 I would get a refund.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 14:09:39 2023 No.6675785 >>6675779 >>6675698 >>6675670 >>6675634 If you had a good time and didn't notice the art was AI until you were told, what's the real problem?

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 14:16:56 2023 No.6675789 >what if (insert fantasy scenario here) ok

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 14:24:04 2023 No.6675793 >6675785 Aight anon but real quick >pyw

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 14:26:42 2023 No.6675798 File: 151 KB, 960x983, D_x-hTuX4AMIzmM.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6675785 >and didn't notice We always notice. You do not pass.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 14:32:20 2023 No.6675807 >>6675439 See >>6674916 If anything, it's the AIggers who are ignorant if they attribute magical and humanlike qualities to an algorithm.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 14:35:08 2023 No.6675810 >>6675785 If I ate the /k/ brownies and thought they tasted good, whats the problem right?

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 14:40:14 2023 No.6675815 Fear of the new or penis envy?

Anonymous Sat May 27 14:43:19 2023 No.6675816
File: 25 KB, 465x291, Water is a luxury.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>6675680
>6675785
You know anon I too was able to get compliments reposting "AI" art back at /sdg/ from less than a thread ago just to see if they would notice
>I could ask why are you think that's an accomplishment

Anonymous Sat May 27 14:50:42 2023 No.6675831

>>6675816
because the fact that some can be spotted and some can't means 1) prompt engineering is legitimate, 2) my prompt engineering and workflow is superior
The more people I get to admire my AI Art without them knowing it's AI, the more I win, plain and simple.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 14:56:50 2023 No.6675836 >>6675831 People that watch movies don't worry about what camera was used or lighting techniques of if it's CGI or some other technique People don't care if it's AI or not.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 15:00:17 2023 No.6675839 File: 54 KB, 1080x767, 8xldct3f2p951.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >6675831 So when I add literal phone filters to random pictures and get likes or just repost the same picture is also valid workflow

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 15:44:08 2023 No.6675873 >>6675831 Post your art. You do not pass. + Not your art. You mad?

Anonymous Sat May 27 15:44:11 2023 No.6675874
File: 1.45 MB, 1280x768, airef.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>6675093
I don't know why hobbyists are so mad about it, I get pros being mad about potentialy getting a pay cut but it certainly has it's uses. You can get some good light, color palette, shading references fast and easy. I'm sure there's much more you can do but even just that is already a cool little tool.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 15:47:32 2023 No.6675876 The burden of proof is on you. I will never admit to using AI.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 15:48:50 2023 No.6675878 >>6674632 >she

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 15:49:15 2023 No.6675879 >>6674341 Colleagues wonder why I started working faster and still retain my art style. Gotta love being able to train your own model

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 15:51:35 2023 No.6675884 >>6675874 You will never be an artist

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 15:53:11 2023 No.6675888 >>6675879 I'll take things that never happened for 200 Jim

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 15:54:48 2023 No.6675891 >>6675876 *uploads your image to a free AI detection service > AI use 99.999% > Model: Stable Diffusion 1.5 Orange Mix Eerie 1.5 > generation settings: 1024x1024 ; denoiser strenght 0.6; solver: DPM Karas + > proompter a faggot: true

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 16:01:57 2023 No.6675902 File: 131 KB, 1280x510, FuPLpC5WIAIcqC8.jpeg.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6675891

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 16:04:28 2023 No.6675906 File: 289 KB, 500x500, 125340798.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6675884 I just do this for fun, not trying to be a pro.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 16:22:02 2023 No.6675930 >>6675876 I thought you ai shitters are proud of using ai? Oh wait, you aren’t because deep down you know you will never get the attention you oh so desire, kek. Also that’s how you get sued, shitskin

Anonymous Sat May 27 17:22:17 2023 No.6676018

>>6674391
It's generic either because it's being done by a cryptobro or someone who barely passed drawing 101. Still, professional artists will slowly bite the bullet and will be able to churn good material ridiculously quick.

IC should put cryptobro "artists" in their places and claim the tech for themselves. Also, stop with the wagecuck mentality and take advantage of the tools to create your own small studio.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 17:25:32 2023 No.6676025 >>6675891 Lol the very idea of finding an "inverse" in this way shows that you have absolutely no idea how any of that actually works, good job on remembering some words though.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 17:27:11 2023 No.6676029 Photobashing will never be art. Even if you do it with a database of a trillion images.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 17:29:10 2023 No.6676037 Inevitable

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 17:43:46 2023 No.6676059 >>6675093 It’s about as fun as google searching for wallpapers.

Anonymous Sat May 27 17:52:17 2023 No.6676075

>>6675632
It’d definitely lose its luster. A great deal of what makes me enjoy something creative is imagining the person and thought process behind it. It’s inspirational. Remove the human, remove the inspiration, it just becomes a dull mash as no shapes have intent behind them. It’s just a product at that point.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 18:01:41 2023 No.6676094 >>6676075 >Remove the human, remove the inspiration That's still there though.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 18:32:21 2023 No.6676152 >>6674363 That looks on par with character art on the iOS and Google play store. Yea korean/chinese game artists are obsolete.

Anonymous Sat May 27 18:38:16 2023 No.6676162

>>6675270
> I keep Medibang gated behind a firewall to block their stupid ads that you can only get rid of by paying a monthly subscription. Used to be you could pay them once to get rid of ads and unlock certain features like the file browser but not any more. I'd get a cracked .apk if I knew where to get one that wouldn't give my droid devices AIDS
Lmao, I bought the premium pack just before they went all in on the subscription stuff.
> I'd get a cracked .apk if I knew where to get one that wouldn't give my droid devices AIDS
Those cracked apps are fine, it is just that none of the MediBang paint cracked apks work well. Cracked apps are a mixed bag nowadays due to apps always needing to be online and anti piracy measures, though I guess it is a good thing, people are way too cheap.

Anonymous Sat May 27 18:42:11 2023 No.6676171

>>6675632
> How would you feel if you played and enjoyed a game, then later found out the art was 80% AI?
Cool job, especially if it is an indie developer. Not only making it but making it not look like ai is one hard accomplishment.
>>6675634
Fuck off gay faggot, people reuse assets all the time in game developers and use Unity marketplace stuff. Even popular games use assets, PUBG was an asset flip when it came out. This is just another form of that which is a lot cheaper then spending gorrilions on artwork.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 18:44:13 2023 No.6676177 >>6675759 > Selling people AI generated assets without disclosing it is an act of scamming by itself. Developers use asset packs all the time. Not really scamming.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 18:50:47 2023 No.6676199 >>6674341 >Taiwanese company Fake country, fake art

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 18:53:29 2023 No.6676205 >>6675874 The internet is flooded with AI. Hobbyists want to learn real skill, not fake shit. Similar to hobby gamers love to watch pro gamer, not bots playing with each other.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 19:02:32 2023 No.6676223 >>6676205 So? There's no reason to be mad about it, just do your thing.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 19:06:42 2023 No.6676226 >>6676171 Fuck off you retarded chink. There’s a reason why people don’t like your indie shovelware trash.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 19:32:36 2023 No.6676269 it doesn't matter what you say AI Art is here to stay

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 20:01:28 2023 No.6676310 >>6674346 I think it's most of the Korean studios who did alot of "Amerianime" back in the 2000s.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 20:03:42 2023 No.6676314 >>6674377 >>6674363 This shit isn't even very good. Those hands & everything melting into each other makes it look awful & generic.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 20:06:07 2023 No.6676318 >>6676314 not to put too fine a point on it, but pyw

Anonymous Sat May 27 20:07:12 2023 No.6676319

>>6674501
>Remember that time when discord degenerates were blackmailing dumb kids into taking hormone pills and posting erotic photos of themselves?
They were all Discord trannies. Grooming children into posting erotic photos of themselves then convincing them to take estrogen pills is right their alley.

Anonymous Sat May 27 20:09:56 2023 No.6676326

>>6674530
Alot of office jobs are going to be replaced the technology. It's already happening with script writer, & now it's happening to artists. Programmers will be the next thing on the chopping block. The days of working in the office are slowly coming to an end, & that's a good thing!

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 20:12:17 2023 No.6676328 >>6674594 Not my problem. The sooner you parasites are removed from the industry, the better.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 20:27:23 2023 No.6676343 >>6675810 Kek underrated

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 20:28:29 2023 No.6676346 >>6676223 you've missed the part about being flooded

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 20:54:53 2023 No.6676400 >>6676346 I didn't miss it but it's kinda irrelevant, digital art was already flooded way before AI.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 21:19:10 2023 No.6676455 >>6676400 >irrelevant neck yourself

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 21:22:28 2023 No.6676465 File: 6 KB, 400x400, 1523574653795.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6675810

>>	Anonymous Sat May 27 23:01:32 2023 No.6676628 AI art will be as quickly forgotten as fidgetspinners also ted was right https://i.4cdn.org/wsg/1685228469883377.webm

>>	Anonymous Sun May 28 08:27:09 2023 No.6677158 >>6674822 nobody thinks that's creative they think it's cute, retard

Anonymous Sun May 28 11:15:32 2023 No.6677307

>>6676400
Sure, but you could at least get some diversity in the styles and there was also the idea that you knew the art was man-made. AI usually looks even more cookie cutter than industry art. It's why most people can detect AI art rather quickly. The way it does clothing, hair, and hands are usually pretty telling. To each their own I guess. I just miss when I could go on AS back in 2017 and look at all the art on there from time to time. All this shit makes me wish I spent my time on that site more often.

>>	Anonymous Sun May 28 14:16:35 2023 No.6677467 >>6674377 The motion/action that's supposed to be expressed in this piece makes no fucking sense.

Anonymous Sun May 28 14:24:05 2023 No.6677470
File: 1.64 MB, 221x244, 1629175326174.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>6674632
>Art is limited to white people who can afford it
>AI art relies entirely on parasitising real art
>AI is thus white man's burden.
Wow I never thought of it like that, anon.

>>	Anonymous Sun May 28 14:48:09 2023 No.6677484 So many seething is this thread, artists btfo by a piece of copper

Anonymous Sun May 28 17:15:41 2023 No.6677592

>>6674372
Except artists don't use this shit. It's primarily being used by a bunch of autistic technerds. We create. That's what artists do. Ordering a robot to create something is not creating anything. It's not creativity; It's akin to ordering a comission.
You bugmen will never understand.. So don't speak for us.

Anonymous Sun May 28 17:26:16 2023 No.6677602

>>6674372
And on top of that this so called "tool" is exploiting countless artists in the process. Some of which you share apreciation for, respect as a peer and possibly even inspired you to start drawing/painting in the first place. Only to know that in the end who benefits are exploitative, greedy, parasitical, corporate scum.
No, us artists are definitely not using this so called tool. We are vehemently against this. Equally so their right hand henchmen too dumb to realise they're being used to do their bidding; the low iq, ignorant bugman helping this new hellscape/ feverdream become a reality for artists worldwide.
You do not speak for us.

>>	Anonymous Sun May 28 17:37:18 2023 No.6677615 >>6677602 >You do not speak for us. Good, smart artists see it as an opportunity.

Anonymous Sun May 28 17:46:23 2023 No.6677630

>>6677615
Smart artists see this as what it is; exploitation. You are the henchman I previously mentioned. You trying to make me out to be the idiot is both ironic and pathetic. It's your last resort when being confronted by a wall of facts. To belittle, mock, antagonise, project and provocate some sort of reaction.
And you wonder why you're universially hated. Respected by nobody.
You will never be an artist. Parasite.

>>	Anonymous Sun May 28 17:53:20 2023 No.6677636 >>6675252 >I don't like working hard This is the reason why prompters will always be hated. Dedication to a craft is a universally admired trait. They are left with nothing when the power goes out.

Anonymous Sun May 28 18:07:27 2023 No.6677662

>>6677630
>>6677602
>another guy uses a computer, can make art like me
>"REEEEEEEE EXPLOITATION"
lol
lmao

>>6677636
>This is the reason why digital artists or people who use power tools will always be hated. Dedication to a craft is a universally admired trait.

>>	Anonymous Sun May 28 18:40:50 2023 No.6677701 Sounds like limited skill set folks are having a hard time with innovation.

>>	Anonymous Mon May 29 05:51:57 2023 No.6678506 >>6675810 kek

Advanced search
Text to find
Subject [?]Search by post subject. Leave empty for any.
Username [?]Search for user name. Leave empty for any user name.
Tripcode [?]Search for tripcode. Leave empty for any.
Email [?]Search by email. Leave empty for any.
Filename [?]Search by image filename. Leave empty for any.
From Date [?]Enter what date to start searching from. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
To Date [?]Enter what date to start searching until. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
Image hash
Search in	All Posts OPs Only
Deleted posts	Show all posts Show only deleted posts Only show non-deleted posts
Internal posts	Show all posts Show only internal posts Show only archived posts
Order	New posts first Old posts first
Capcode	All Posts Only by Users Only by Mods Only by Admins Only by Developers
Results	Posts Threads
Action	[ Simple ]

/ic/ - Artwork/Critique