/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

[Anonymous No.6668611]

Is it worth learning anatomy and composition just so I can create things to put in img2img with AI? AI is extremely limited in this regard and making any sort of specific pose or framing is nearly impossible with text only

[Anonymous No.6668613]

I'm so tired of AIcucks.

[Anonymous No.6668614]

>>6668611
>Is it worth learning
Do you want to read the sticky? Yes or no?

[Anonymous No.6668615]

ban op

[Anonymous No.6668616]

>>6668611
Drawing on the left is better. If you can draw, there's no reason to use AI. It will only homogenize the personality out of your work while introducing errors and distortions. AI is for people who want to press a button and see a pretty picture, not actually create something.

[Anonymous No.6668618]

>>6668616
But I can have both, I can make the awesome drawing on the left and still have the cool fully finished brightly colored artwork on the right

[Anonymous No.6668620]

https://www.artstation.com/artwork/46b0W

[Anonymous No.6668623]

>>6668620
yep that's what I took it from, I just googled 2 girls and it made me want to get into it more and make my own because it was great

[Anonymous No.6668627]

>>6668618
Indeed, you can have both. But you wouldn't want the one on the right if you could make the one on the left. And if you wanted a finished version of the one on the left, with your style, costuming and posing choices intact, and no extra fingers, you would just finish it yourself. That would be easy for you if you could draw the one on the left.

[Anonymous No.6668629]

>>6668618
Doubt it since you're another retarded AIcuck

[Anonymous No.6668632]

>>6668611
Or you learn how to draw art so that you can draw art.

[Anonymous No.6668634]

>>6668611
Hand isnt doing the right gesture, character on the left is looking the wrong way, character on the left's pose is wrong, arm isnt even wrapped around, right doesnt have the seductive look...

This artwork barely resembles the original way the drawing was meant to be portrayed

[Anonymous No.6668636]

>>6668611
Ban all AI posters. Force them to migrate to /a/ (because all they really want is create anime titties) or /v/ (because ai art, fundamentally, is a video game for weeb coomers).

[Anonymous No.6668638]

>>6668636
I agree with /v/. Keeps them off /vg/.

[Anonymous No.6668674]

>>6668611
neck yourself

[Anonymous No.6670040]

>>6668636
Don't fucking send them to /a/, we have enough retarded mongrels there already, just send them back to /g/

[Anonymous No.6670045]

>>6668623
So the AI cuck doesn't even draw. Stick to AI and don't come back to this board.

[Anonymous No.6670046]

>another pleb thinks generic rendered>sketch
it's all so tiresome

[Anonymous No.6670047]

>>6668636
/g/ is the techjeet containment hole, they all should go there.

[Anonymous No.6670050]

>>6668636
This. I'm so tired of AI not because I'm scared of them "takin' muh jerb!" but the utter trash that everyone creates constantly along with the redundant retarded convos. Instagram #chararacterdesign #illustration etc. Hashtags are destroyed by these idiots Artstation had the right idea by forcing you to put a tag on them and giving them their own kiddie pool to play in.

[Anonymous No.6670166]

>>6668611
What would you do the day AI won't be available?
You can use whatever you want as a statement but don't fool yourself.
>>6668616
>AI is for people who want to press a button and see a pretty picture, not actually create something.
People said the same about photography back in the days.

[Debater No.6670174]

>>6670166
Its also placed in its own category has its own board too my nigga

[Anonymous No.6670186]

>>6670166
>Photography

More photobashing. Which AI will be used for in the industry, when speed is king concept artists probably will start learning to prompt to get ahead, there would probably be tons of artists using it like OP wants to.

[Anonymous No.6670189]

>>6670166
>People said the same about photography back in the days.
people said that about camera pictures, then the art of photography was developed. it was clearly define how it was art. you niggers try to use it as justification, skipping the defining process

[Anonymous No.6670207]

>>6670189
Can't you uderstand that the art of AI goes on the precise prompt way? It will need visualization and trial, anon just acept it.

[Anonymous No.6670212]

idk

[Anonymous No.6670227]

>>6670207
telling someone or something to do something for you is not manipulating the medium, try again. 3d printing a chair doesn't make you a woodcarver or a sculptor.
>just accept it
down to bargaining, eh? the answer is no.

[Anonymous No.6670256]

>>6670227
>doesn't make you a woodcarver or a sculptor
yes they arent, are they claiming that?
>telling someone or something to do something for you is not manipulating the medium
And just clicking a button (camera) is?
>down to bargaining, eh?
>try again
I'm trying! Dude, i'm a fairy, let me in!

[Anonymous No.6670264]

>>6670256
>and just clicking a button (camera) is?
no, because that's not what photography is. you fail with a false equivalency.

[Anonymous No.6670269]

>>6670256
okay then. go to a photograpy art contest just clicking on the camera prompt monkey, then come back and tell us how humilliating was your experience.

[Anonymous No.6670273]

>>6670264
Ah but it was an apropriate comparation to what you said "telling someone or something to do something for you", prompting on AI will develop you will see, it has it's fun on telling the more detailed stuff and getting the more unique stuff. Picking the light, hour of the day, etc. a photographer do can also be done in the form of prompts. Dude don't fight it, embrace it.

[Debater No.6670277]

>>6670273
Honestly shill more and see why people despise you, for acting like a fag every waking day

[Anonymous No.6670293]

>>6670273
you will never get a 1:1 transition to the medium, you'd need to draw for that or a neural link. again, your example is not applicable, I don't have the camera create the photography, only take the picture.
>don't fight it
why does it upset you so not to be considered an artist?

[Anonymous No.6670299]

>>6670277
Wowow, ouchies dubs. Just take the commertial end off, dude, it will sound fun doing crazy stuff just for the sake of it! But i need to be real with you, you got this straight: just one thread of AI a day is good enought on /ic/, its too much spammed here.

[Anonymous No.6670311]

>>6670293
nonono, prompting is more fun than clicking button, ok? And the entitlement "artist" is that important? Fun is more. But your definition "1:1 to the medium" can also be atained on prompting, wasnt the tutorial one on ST the "asuka prompt" that is meant to be very similar/equal?

[Anonymous No.6670322]

>>6670311
*SD, also full of typos, i'm sleepy.
Dude, i gonna be serious, i didn't even used AI (yet) but i have read about it, my GPU isn't stronk enough. But the possibilities seem just very interesting to just close the eyes to. I will stop trolling you guys so, stay sharp, fren, the avant garde is beside uns.

[Anonymous No.6670323]

>>6670311
>(You)

[Anonymous No.6670470]

>>6668611
Usually I'd say people in this thread are coping when they say the drawing is better. But this is one of those exceptions where the drawing is actually much better than the AI.

[Anonymous No.6670636]

>>6668618
The drawing on the right isn’t even the same picture, it didn’t even keep the same pose.

[Anonymous No.6670644]

>>6668616
No it's not, retard.

[Anonymous No.6670714]

>>6670644
yes it is. don't sign your posts.

[Anonymous No.6670718]

>>6670644
what zero fundies do to you

[Anonymous No.6670742]

>>6668611
nigger simply can't tell why right picture is infinitely inferior to right picture

[Anonymous No.6670755]

>>6668613
But it's the luddites who are the cucks

[Anonymous No.6670852]

All the eroticism and interest completely gone from the image. It’s like replacing great steak with Walmart ground beef.

[Anonymous No.6670944]

Everyday I come onto this board and a nigger is posting an AI bait thread. And you fuckers are gobbling it straight up like carp.

[Anonymous No.6670947]

>>6668616
I would never pay even $5 for the left chicken scratching shit

[Anonymous No.6670975]

>>6670944
Most people on /ic/ ironically don't actually want to talk about art and improving on this board. They want to bitch and make excuses as to why they aren't improving. It's always been doom posting even before AI.

[Anonymous No.6671026]

>>6670975
>It's always been doom posting even before AI.
This
it has always been the crab mentality board

[Anonymous No.6671030]

>>6670975
So you're saying we should just use AI and make art

[Anonymous No.6671037]

>>6670975
>they want to bitch and make excuses as to why they aren't improving
So they've turned into /ic ?

[Anonymous No.6671079]

>>6671030
Frankly I think you can use anything to make art. I am a huge supporter of transformative work and fair use and I believe AI falls under that. That being said relying too much on handicaps and shortcuts will not make you improve. It's like using bots in a game. You might score higher but you aren't actually better at the game.

That being said I don't believe AI belongs in this board. If you aren't interested in learning and improving the skill of hand making a piece of art there isn't any point in you posting here. Topics about utilizing AI to create an image aren't relevant to hand drawn art and would get a better and more comprehensive response in /g/ anyway.

[Anonymous No.6671116]

>>6671079
You still can use your hands to generate AI art and traditional art doesn't require hands either

[Anonymous No.6671130]

You use your brain to make art.

[Anonymous No.6671137]

>>6668611
Thanks OP for illustrating how shot AI is at showing intention/story

[Anonymous No.6671138]

>>6671137
/ic/ isn't any better kek

[Anonymous No.6671183]

>>6671116
Was this supposed to be a meaningful response in any capacity because it's entirely irrelevant.

[Anonymous No.6671231]

Inevitable

[Anonymous No.6671281]

>>6670975
>>6671026
This is common everywhere where art is involved unfortunately, the admins at r/artistslounge had to put out a statement saying "please stop telling us how much you hate art and how you want to kill yourself while you're making art" and one of the replies to a positive post about art was "holy shit finally someone who doesn't hate art?!"

[Anonymous No.6671305]

>>6671281
I get it because art can be a painful hobby but for a board that is supposed to be focused on crit and improvement it's frustrating that the majority of conversation is largely off topic.

[Anonymous No.6671311]

>>6671305
the board is newfag city, 80% of the time I try to discuss something on a level greater than skimming baby’s first art manual, I get assaulted by DK retards parroting something retarded they were told by another retard
it’s basically impossible to have a discussion outside the trad threads, and even then half the posts are brian

[Anonymous No.6671317]

>>6671311
most people leave once they reach beyond /int/, meanwhile /beg/s and tourists come everyday and perma/beg/s never leave

[Anonymous No.6671321]

>>6671317
Where do they leave to? I find it hard to discuss and critique art almost anywhere especially if it's not anon because then it typically becomes a circle jerk hugbox.

[Anonymous No.6671338]

>>6671321
Where to? No particular place, but anywhere is better than this shithole. The only way to talk to other /int/s is to befriend them first or join one of those inner circles. Discord has been the only place I've been able to have discussions beyond surface level babby stuff /ic/ over focuses on.

[Anonymous No.6671357]

>>6671338
See Discord is exactly what I am talking about by hugboxes I find so often that Discord servers end up having an issue where people don't want to offend anybody so the critique gets watered down and sometimes just not even offered because everyone is friends and they don't want to start shit. Perhaps some servers are better but I've yet to find one that works for me.

I do agree though that /ic/ often is very VERY surface level on it's critique though.

[Anonymous No.6671395]

>>6671357
>hugboxes I find so often that Discord servers end up having an issue where people don't want to offend anybody
That's just an issue in those bigger servers where nobody knows anyone. It's also an issue when you're too /beg/ and people can't be arsed to give you proper critique. If you want get roasted just tell people to.

[Anonymous No.6671432]

>>6668611
>Is it worth learning anatomy and composition just so I can create things to put in img2img with AI?

yes, see pic related, just draw regardless of the quality, then the A.I. will do the rest

[Anonymous No.6671460]

blatant bait, not worth the (you), try harder next time

[Anonymous No.6671472]

>6668611
>Is it worth learning anatomy and composition just so I can create things to put in img2img with AI?
Why are you asking people on a board about art if it's worth learning about art? It's really obvious it's another shit AI thread anyway, but do you ever ask yourself what you could have accomplished if you actually applied yourself instead of begging for attention online?

>6670755
>But it's the luddites who are the cucks
Yet the AI morons somehow want to be them.

Ban AI threads.

[Anonymous No.6671474]

don't bump AI threads
don't reply to AI niggers
report off topic threads

[Anonymous No.6671504]

>>6671474
test

[Anonymous No.6671551]

>>6671432
don't you think the artist of pic left could do pic right 'le modern anime style' after a week or two of deliberate practice?
they can't because they gave up irrc. don't let ai cuck you.

[Anonymous No.6671553]

>>6671504
you can reply without bumping by putting sage in the options. sage comes from the japanese sageru which means bring down

[Anonymous No.6671692]

kek

[Anonymous No.6671694]

>>6671692

[Anonymous No.6671739]

>>6671551
You can do whatever style you want with AI.

[Anonymous No.6671788]

>>6671739
No, you can let the AI do it. but that's cuck behavior.

[Anonymous No.6671791]

>>6671788
How's your log cabin doing?

[Anonymous No.6671796]

>>6671791
I used chatgpt to give me instructions. It's done and I rent it out. I'll move in when the drone swarms come.

[Anonymous No.6671799]

>>6670227
>3d printing a chair doesn't make you a woodcarver or a sculptor.
Sure, it makes you a 3D printer. And you clearly need some knowledge to correctly 3D print anything. A knowledge that even the best woodcarver won't have just by mastering woodcarving.
>>6670174
3D has its own board too but I don't see many people complaining about 3D on /ic/. Now don't get me wrong : I despise AI art for many reasons but let's accept it's just a tool nonetheless.
>>6670186
>when speed is king concept artists probably will start learning to prompt to get ahead, there would probably be tons of artists using it like OP wants to.
Yes sure, as most concept artists shifted from traditionnal to digital mediums. Or even engineers shifted from blueprints to Autocad. But the more people will rely on machines the more we'll get closer to some energy production limit. For the machine is immortal (as long as you have enough petrol/coal/nuclear power to feed it).
>>6670189
>people said that about camera pictures, then the art of photography was developed.
But we still do "camera pictures" nowadays. Exact reproductions of faces or landscapes without any artistic value added are still being made and masses and critics aren't complaining about it. It's just a tool and it hasn't killed painters.

[Anonymous No.6671822]

>>6671799
a lot of meaningless arguing that in no way validates AI users as artists or AI as merely an artistic tool. shame on you for bumping

[Anonymous No.6671877]

>>6668611
If you're going to shill AI, at least try to make it *somewhat* resemble the sketch.

AI still looks like shit without corrections, though.

[Anonymous No.6671884]

>>6671877
>"hands were solved months ago"

[Anonymous No.6671899]

>>6671692
xDDD hahah artists are so retarded

[Anonymous No.6671932]

>>6671877
That's decent honestly, the problem is that the only way to get it to stick to the original concept is to make it copy the sketch very very rigidly, at which point it becomes very difficult to change any other part of the drawing.

So you end up needing to actively redraw the rest of the drawing to fit your vision and at that point you need to learn art.

[Anonymous No.6672131]

>>6671877
>the hand on the right is STILL wrong, AND the facial expressions on both of them is wrong

god I hate it

[Anonymous No.6672188]

>>6671899
i know right?

[Anonymous No.6672290]

>>6671884
They were. It's anon's fault for not using control net.

[Anonymous No.6672297]

>>6671877
>AI still looks like shit without corrections, though.
Yeah that’s the thing. In the end, I feel like correcting AI would take me more time than making the art from a scratch.

[Anonymous No.6672323]

>>6668611
Kill yourself retard. If you learned how to draw you could just make the right image anyway.

[Anonymous No.6672334]

>>6672297
It removes the passion out of drawing, which is the reason artists do it in the first place.

No artist wants to spend three hours "not drawing" a picture, it gives you zero sense of accomplishment.

[Anonymous No.6672410]

>>6672290
totally solved, yep, you're ready for aaa

[Anonymous No.6673925]

>>6668636
>Force them to migrate to /a/
They very much often try to infest it
/a/ is so tired of their shit they've managed to unionize them against their slop, their threads get bullied into either an early bump limit or just deliberately sinked to death

[Anonymous No.6673929]

>>6670975
>Most people on /ic/ ironically don't actually want to talk about art and improving on this board. They want to bitch and make excuses as to why they aren't improving. It's always been doom posting even before AI.
Do you realize these threads get bumped by the AIshitters themselves and the mods don't give a shit either, right? There's literally no way of winning in that game of yours.
If the threads are left untouched then they just keep spamming more demoralization threads and if they get the obvious negative response they crave or they get bumped by the same bad actors, then everyone is a "crab that took the bait" for posting on them.

[Anonymous No.6673933]

>>6672290
do that with your own hand right now and note the differences. it's fucking horrid.

[Anonymous No.6673937]

>>6670975
It went from 3 ai shitter threads to 5 in the span of a few months. I’m expecting it will become 8-9 in the near future. Ai cock suckers are subhuman roaches, no matter how much you btfo’d or swat away them away, they will keep on coming. They will parrot the same “arguments” like a fucking robot and I won’t be surprised if half their post are written by fucking chatgpt.

[Anonymous No.6673954]

>>6671799

[Anonymous No.6673961]

>>6673954
there is a random button on some character creations in video games. Some people press it for an hour just to get the perfect character. Clearly this is art.

[Anonymous No.6673970]

>>6673954
I looked at his twitter for this supposed 4 hour prompted "perfect shot" image and I don't think it's possible to tell when an aifag spend more or less time. every image just looks identical to the rest of the stuff coming from mid-journey. you can't tell these fools apart. what a retarded way to spend your time.

[Anonymous No.6674058]

>>6673954
there's no human context, be it 4h or 400

[Anonymous No.6674111]

>>6673933
Ok. I did. It looks great. You're just a schizo.

[Anonymous No.6674152]

>>6674111
not anon but youre blind

[Anonymous No.6674175]

>>6674152
The only mistake is this shading error. That's it. But it can still be passed as a groove. But if you really hate it, you can easily remove it through in-paint, or just plain old photoshop. Everything else looks great, and easily a better hand than anyone /ic/ can draw, including me.

All of you anti-AI schizos are in a superposition between "it looks awful" and "it's gonna take our jebs!" Those are two mutually exclusive positions.

[Anonymous No.6674179]

>>6674175
The proportions are all fucking wrong, retard. It's like you've never seen a hand.
>All of you anti-AI schizos are in a superposition between "it looks awful" and "it's gonna take our jebs!" Those are two mutually exclusive positions.
Those aren't mutually exclusive, retarded nigger.

[Anonymous No.6674183]

>>6668636
No thanks, both /a/ and /v/ similarly reject AI niggers. When it doesn't get outright ignored, AI posting just dooms the thread to turn into a fight between jeets and people spitting on the garbage they post.
Last AI thread I saw on /a/ actually had a janny deleting all the posts shitting on AI though, it was pretty funny to observe how hard he was seething.

[Anonymous No.6674184]

>>6674175
virtually all automation resulted in shit tier quality and replaced tradesmen regardless

[Anonymous No.6674188]

>>6674175
Look at the attachment of the index finger to the palm; also, the index fingernail, and how the tip of the index finger seems to pass behind the hair. The pinky is atrocious and that is more than a "shading error." It's way too thick, especially at its base where the AI apparently smooshed two fingers together. See also the attachment of the ring finger to the palm (that weird dovetailing), and the groove that seemingly encircles the entirety of the digit at the last phalange. The lengths/thicknesses of the fingers are also fucked up, so that the ring finger appears longer than the middle finger, etc.

Not solved, by a long shot, even with the extra work of using control net. An artist could just draw the hand in a few minutes.

[Anonymous No.6674192]

>>6674175
>easily a better hand than anyone /ic/ can draw, including me
of course it is, it is created by data of countless pros. Also it is still fucked up. The pinky finger is higer than the ring finger, which you should see why this is wrong if you just look at it and the nail on the pointing finger is a whole different thing.

But you wouldnt see that because you never even tried to draw a hand and need to commission a database.

[Anonymous No.6674193]

good effort but why are you guys even attempting to explain to an AI using faggot what a hand is even supposed to look like, it's not like you're convincing him to stop using his goyslop generator
just leave him to wallow in his eternal sub-permabeg state
any second spent trying to analyze machine vomit is wasted

[Anonymous No.6674196]

>>6673937
>>6673929
Yeah and it used to be muh non-asian genes threads and muh aphantasia and muh adhd and any other bullshit excuse you can think of.

Realistically the only thing we have to ignore these threads Sage em and contribute to the other threads harder. Reply to everyone actually drawing not BS like this.

Now yes, I will shut up here and take my own advice.

[Anonymous No.6674222]

>>6674175
At this point people aren't really concerned about getting their jerbs terken, because AIslop is uncopyrightable and it's not really good for anything but semi-random pwetty pictuwes.
The most damning thing is that, by design, imagegen algos are designed to exactly recreate data that they're trained on and associate tags to it. This data is "remembered" as coordinate points within the dataset's latent space. As a side effect, when you pick a point between the points associated with "originals", you'll get an interpolation of them. When you prompt, the image generator will pick points associated with the words and generate them- like an image search. Datasets are basically the biggest libraries of photobashing resources ever made. Also child porn, but that's neither here nor there.
>inb4 b-buh how can a b-bajillion images f-fit in such a small size, haha checkmate
The same way that Minecraft can "fit" a near limitless number of worlds each weighing in at around 50k TB each, or the game .kkrieger can fit an entire fully 3D FPS game into a file smaller than most .jpegs- procedural generation. Like I said already, image generators are trained to recreate input exactly- except since there are so many of them, the sea of interpolation space is so vast that the originals are almost impossible to find by chance, which is what the creators want. In fact, being able to find coordinates corresponding to an original is considered a problem.

[Anonymous No.6674224]

>>6674183
got a thread number?

[Anonymous No.6674247]

>>6674179
>>6674188
>The proportions are all fucking wrong
different people have different proportions. You're one of those niggas who say it's wrong because it's not like in the book.

>The pinky is atrocious and that is more than a "shading error." It's way too thick
See the above. It's a burly man with burly proportions. The pinky is thick because it fits the character.
Everything else you say it's either nitpicking or straight up wrong.

>>6674222
lmao. Every time one of you tries to argue about the inner workings of AI, it's like watching a caveman trying to explain why it rains. There's no photobashing, don't be retarded. It learns a probabilistic distribution when denoising an image. That means they learn how likely it is to observe certain patterns, features, colors, shapes, etc. There's no copying, there's no pasting. And the rain isn't caused by you rubbing rocks together, Ugg.

Here's a paper on it. Have a fun read.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2006.11239

[Anonymous No.6674255]

>>6674247
We all know it's a probabilistic photocopier. This already has been established, disingenous nigger.

[Anonymous No.6674257]

>>6674247
good thing legislators are fellow cavemen then. gruk together strong

[Anonymous No.6674260]

>>6674255
>https://arxiv.org/abs/2006.11239
Did you read the paper? What's your take on it?

[Anonymous No.6675638]

>>6674152
We are artist not biologist

[Anonymous No.6675734]

>>6674247
>Everything else you say it's either nitpicking or straight up wrong.
the cope lol. accept the loss.
>ring finger with the foreskin rolled back
>"nitpicking! maybe it's just a scar."
lmao
>index finger poking out the side of the hand, off angle with the rest of the fingers
>"nitpicking! maybe he just broke his finger when he was young and it healed wrong."
guffaw

[Anonymous No.6675844]

>>6674247
Why the mental gymnastics?

Why cannot you people just admit that AI would be shit without pre-existing art works?

I would be a bit more respectful if you at least admitted that fact

[Anonymous No.6675963]

>>6668611 commit sudoku please

[Anonymous No.6676173]

>>6675844
>Why cannot you people just admit that AI would be shit without pre-existing art works?
no shit? No artist would be shit without pre-existing art. That doesn't mean it's photobashing, retard.

[Anonymous No.6676179]

>>6676173
Just because it's not pasting pixels it doesn't mean it's not copying. Fuck off greedy jew.

[Anonymous No.6676686]

>>6668611
just fix this and you'll be fine

[Anonymous No.6676700]

>>6674247
Explain this then
PROTIP: You can't (without incriminating yourself)

[Anonymous No.6676838]

>>6676173
Taking artistic inspiration and learning human to human is worlds apart from a machine doing it and yet you people keep bringing it up as if its a valid argument. Either you don't really understand nor appreciate art or you're being maliciously disingenuous. Its photobashing with a convenient few extra steps so you can feign innocence while robbing the art community wholesale. Also we'll read your little paper if you draw us a passable hand :)

[Anonymous No.6676865]

>>6676838
>Taking artistic inspiration and learning human to human is worlds apart from a machine doing it
no it isn't

[Anonymous No.6676875]

>>6676865
the very fact that you need to actually tell the machine which type of image you want, and guide it even more so is why it's different from a human taking inspiration and having the agency to do so for whatever they'd like. I don't know why you'd go so far as to say AI models somehow have sentience all of a sudden to learn and take inspiration, but this is like the most basic of shit arguments that doesn't make sense that have been brought up months ago.

[Anonymous No.6676876]

>>6671877
still completely lost the look of the original

[Anonymous No.6676952]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HCEoUkeoDOY

[Anonymous No.6676963]

>>6676876
well the original kinda sucks

[Anonymous No.6677306]

>>6668611
Look at the expressions of the first one and then the second. Both are entirely different and serve completely different messages. It's clear you retarded 3rd worlder bugmen can't understand human emotion or expression, this is why we hate you. The tech just sucks on principle.

[Anonymous No.6677395]

>>6671877
lost the style, lost the gesture, what are we trying to achieve here again? generic garbage?

[Anonymous No.6678598]

>>6674152
>>6674179
>>6674188
>"Thank you for the feedback, we will fix it in the upcoming update"
This is what you get, you could have written an article telling people how AI will affect the artist community, the direction of the arts, and many more, but you chose to aggressively find flaws in the AI tech that is currently under development, acting like a beta tester
Yes you regain your artist's dignity for weeks, but you will lose it all in 10 years.

[Anonymous No.6678603]

>>6678598
>in 10 years.
The 2 more weeks cope keeps increasing. It was 2 years, now its 10. We are reaching for decades now.

[Anonymous No.6678619]

>>6678598
That fool claimed hands were solved, confidently presented his "solved" hand. it was not solved. artists showed him what he couldn't recognize himself.
>you chose to aggressively find flaws
aggressively? these things stick out like a deformed thumb to trained artists.
>but you will lose it all in 10 years.
in ten years I hope AI can take my drawings and bring them to life on my page through AR. prompting drawings of characters on screen and doing it that way is not as magic. seeing MY drawings live, that's a whole 'nother level to seeing my "prompts" live, you get that right? I will step into MY paintings as fully interactive VR worlds. real artists win in the end.

[Anonymous No.6681619]

>>6668611
I'd at least make the head a bit bigger desu

[Anonymous No.6681635]

>>6668636
They will need their own board.

[Anonymous No.6684520]

>>6668616
why not learn how to colour and shade yourself? its really not that hard (especially if your goal is this generic anime style). put enough effort into it and you will be able to second nature it

[Anonymous No.6684522]

>>6670947
I would never pay even $5 for some Ai shit I can do myself by pressing two buttons

[Anonymous No.6684578]

>>6670755
most of the people here are literally digital artists and have no problem with any (actual) tool
learn what words mean