This is what AI art is all about

[Anonymous No.6644161]

This guy creates new meme shit, he combines AI with photbashing, and editing, adding his own backgrounds and details etc, I love it.

Do you still hate AI art when it is something like this? With a lot of work put in?

[Anonymous No.6644167]

That goyslop collage is not art. Fuck you for making me see this garbage.

[Anonymous No.6644169]

>>6644161
well its definitely more creative than most ai art.

[Anonymous No.6644179]

>a lot of work put in
no work was put in
sageru

[Anonymous No.6644181]

>"THIS IS WHAT AI IS ABOUT! LOW HANGING MEMES AND PORN! I LOVE IT! WOW!"

>consumercattle still doesn't get it that most art is worthless trash and the slop the new thing shits out is even more worthless, because most artists are worthless consumers who only want to consume and get rich and famous
Most artists are afraid to draw a stick man because
>"golly gee! wouldnt want people to think i suck at art! i must be good! praise me! love me! worship me!"
I lol and i lmao

[sage No.6644193]

why care if /ic/ hates ai or whatever

[Anonymous No.6644238]

>>6644161
Looks uncanny. >>6644167

[Anonymous No.6644244]

>>6644161
this looks spastic

[Anonymous No.6644262]

>>6644193
AI is based because of the people who hate it.

[Anonymous No.6644285]

>>6644161
Sorry, but I'm only interested in real artists. I just... I just can't get it up for transartists. I can't help it, I was born this way, I'm sorry.

[Anonymous No.6644288]

>>6644285
B-but who is gonna pay for maintaining my open maggot infested rotten axe wound?

[Anonymous No.6644306]

>>6644161
I've seen good examples of AI with Actual creative input, so why choose this bottom of the barrel dogshit compared to those?
I'm with >>6644167

[Anonymous No.6644393]

>>6644161
The idea is there, but the execution not so much. The background art it's all wonky and fucked up. It needs more tweaking. Asuka's left arm needs lot's of work, and shinji looks too strong, he should be skinnier.
That's the probelm with AI little details mess an overall ok image

[Anonymous No.6644397]

>>6644161
god I wish that were me

[Anonymous No.6644407]

>>6644161
I am rather indifferent actually.
I keep finding the works of AI to just be... Impressively generic.
I can't see anything in them that sparks anything in me.

Still, that's just the tool - it's good in producing on it's own generic stuff, rather good molds and concept bases.

An artist can add the personality to it by polishing, adding stuff manually and giving life to the calculated result.

Once all the legal issues and regulations will be resolved, I think the AI will just be used as another tool, and like always, only artists will use that tool effectively, the rest will just spawn more generic empty nonsense.

[Anonymous No.6644415]

>>6644161
Look at the lines. He didn't put much effort . This is collage poorly done. I did many of this shit myself and it's not for me. I feel like a clown and by the way I got kicked out from a subreddit because of it. Kek

[Anonymous No.6644419]

>>6644161
You are a faggot.

[Anonymous No.6644429]

>>6644419
AI is low effort, it's worst than photobashing. Only retards use it.
Op ypu are a faggot looking for validation.
/ic/ is high IQ high art only, you bitch, yourvquestion offends me.

[Anonymous No.6644432]

>>6644161
Looks more soulful than anything modern anime industry has produced.

[Anonymous No.6644453]

>>6644161

remove all the data that you don't consent on from the dataset and train a fresh model using only public domain image.

lets see you people try to produce pretty pictures

[Anonymous No.6644469]

>>6644161
>With a lot of work put in?
I proompted all night sirs

[Anonymous No.6644476]

>>6644453
we can now

so keep seething

[Anonymous No.6644519]

>>6644181
like 99% of what gets drawn on 4chan art, the most contrarian art site that talks about creativity and le soul, is anime girls, not even comics of anime girls just plain anime girls, most of these guys would probably stop and consider themselves gods at being sakimichan.

Creativity and ambition is not that common even among artists if you stop looking exclusively at mangaka and comic book makers, most artists on the internet wont even make an animation.

[Anonymous No.6644529]

>>6644476
Why is this such a huge downgrade?
I can understand the hand not being expressive, but everything else is just flat.

[Anonymous No.6644542]

>>6644181
>Most artists are afraid to draw a stick man because

this is me right now

can intrinsic motivation be learned?

I recognize that there are no shortcuts and anything worth doing takes a lot of effort and time. After all when you consume something you want to hear how it has been in development for years and made by a craftsman with 20+ years of experience and not shat out in an hour by someone after a 1 week crash course.

But without getting any dopamine whatever during the study process it's hard to keep myself motivated.

[Anonymous No.6644544]

>>6644519
>say whatever you want
>when given evidence this is wrong simply deny it
>claim the other person is mad
rinse and repeat. instead of posting ideas contrary to the OP i know just call them a retard, scroll for a bit to see if there are any good pictures then leave.

the entirety of this site is made of people not worth conversing with, just chuckle at something funny occassionally and move to a different thread

[Anonymous No.6644548]

>>6644161
>tranime
No thanks

[Anonymous No.6644589]

>>6644548
anime*

[Anonymous No.6644591]

>>6644589
Tranime*

[Anonymous No.6644629]

>>6644453
So when is /ic/ going to remove the video course general?

[Anonymous No.6644631]

>>6644629
Hopefully today

[Anonymous No.6644639]

>>6644519
most fags here also dont care about art or drawing, besides it being something to earn money with so they dont have to get a job, that is why all they do is porn since that is the niche that has high probability of making them money.
It's also a consumer demographic issue; most art consumers and buyers are porn addicts and teenagers. Porn addicts share and buy art and teenagers share porn art everywhere.
Why do you think those guy would stop at Sakimichan level? Because that makes money i.e. they dont give a shit about art as an expression, but they use art to offer a service purely and solely to make money off.
They've got no integrity, no ambition and no personality. Which is reflected by the state of the board as this anon said >>6644544
>>6644542
Literally use any excuse to draw. Make your own reaction drawings and use that at least as a warm-up.
Get creative, draw badly, go out of your comfort zone, make mistakes, test new shit, try new shit, draw whatever the fuck you want but most importantly; have fun.

Motivation is a meme for fake gurus that want to sell you their online video courses.
>you want to hear how it has been in development for years and made by a craftsman with 20+ years of exp
Consumercattle only cares about the result, not if it was eaten, digested and shat out by a golden cow, and boiled in holy water while Jesus himself came down from the heavens and nutted all over it.
Who do you need to prove your worth to anyway? A bunch of trannies who want to desperately collect imaginary internet numbers because they believe their lives will finally be worth something and that all those people following them actually will give a shit about their existence except for being a coom printing machine, while they will still keep screaming into the void?
Doing meaningless pretty pictures isn't the endgoal of art because if it were, then no one would need to pursue art anymore due to AI being able to do the pretty pictures.

[Anonymous No.6644690]

>>6644529
The involvement of AI simply sucks the emotion and appeal out of a drawing.
>>6644476
The drawing on the left isn’t the most impressive one in the world, obviously. Generic. Ugly. Boring. You can say all the bad things you can say about a piece of drawing and they’ll all apply to it to some degree.
But despite all that, it’s endearing. You know there’s a person out there, who, in a random day of 2008, invested his limited time on earth and his limited knowledge of how to draw to make this thing. It’s a nice fact to think about, and that fact alone make it worthwhile to look and appreciate it, even for a very short moment.
The picture on the right, on the other hand, definitely looks cleaner, more modern. But it’s also just an end result of machine processing. I have no desire or reason to be emotionally affected by it.
The idea that there’s someone’s time, effort, and idea behind it is what gives drawings their worth. If the AIbro who posted this pull the biggest plot twist of 2023 and say “HAHA YOU DUMB DRAWKEK! BOTH THE LEFT AND RIGHT DRAWING WAS AI GENERATED!”, I’ll probably immediately lose my emotional connection I felt to the left drawing as well. Because it became clear that it was just yet another meaningless result of an algorithm.

[Anonymous No.6644827]

>>6644161
>being proud over this
lol
lmao even

[Anonymous No.6644833]

>>6644161

This is possibly the worst picture ever made.

[Anonymous No.6644926]

>>6644161
>a lot of work put in.
Would've been put to better use actually learning how to draw

[Anonymous No.6644958]

>>6644519
>>6644639
To each and their own. You're not dictating anyone's lives other than your own. Sone artists are fine plateauing at a certain point, some just like the process and are okay being a wagie for someone else's vision while some would carry on improving their craft even if they happen to make a ton of money. More often than not money is simply there as a means of sustencance considering art is not an easy career to get into.

Tldr just draw lmao

[Anonymous No.6645008]

>>6644958
Hi I'm the first poster, I'm genuinely fine with that, I like having artwork just be there to look good or be fun fanart of an anime you recently watched or something you like.

I meant my comment more against humancels that think art has to be super aspirational and meaningful and convey a story and tell you about the author, sometimes something just looks pretty or is fun to see

[Anonymous No.6645041]

>>6644690
I'm not an AI fag but you are at unbelieveable levels of cope

[Anonymous No.6645043]

>>6645041
Many such cases

[Anonymous No.6645057]

>>6645008
>humancels
You should end your life just for typing this shit unironically

[Anonymous No.6645093]

>>6645008
>humancels
It's like you pajeets are bound by a contract to always give away what you are in your posts, almost had me comvinced you were a real person

[Anonymous No.6645111]

Everyone who is against AI art is just a bad artist who only got by as an "artist" by the fact that a lot of people need images for their own reasons and don't really have an eye for what's good or not. I wouldn't take anything they say too seriously. Anyone who is actually talented and has good and interesting ideas to put on paper has no reason to be threatened.

BTW Rebuilds do suck, thank you to whoever made OP image

[Anonymous No.6645131]

>>6645111
This

[Anonymous No.6645160]

Fuck your thread OP but has anyone started to notice how AISlop has been shitting up google images too? How can one make a filter to get rid of this garbage?

[Anonymous No.6645185]

>>6645160
>Fuck your thread OP

Based

[Anonymous No.6645197]

>>6645160
Why so angry anon? It's all gonna be OK, don't worry

[Anonymous No.6645201]

>>6645197
No no, FUCK you AND your punkass, bitchass, scuff-ass thread you cocksucker.

[Anonymous No.6645202]

>>6644161
God imagine the smell, I want to be cut by two anime mommys so bad bros....

[Anonymous No.6645206]

>>6645201
Not my thread brother, hope you feel better <3 Life's too short

[Anonymous No.6645209]

>>6644161
the rebuilds do suck tho

[Anonymous No.6645239]

>>6645111
Not everyone is a cuck like you, I do not wish for my art or anyone elses to be swallowed by a data wood chipper and spit into shitty derivatives again, it is disgusting on a fundamental level.

[Anonymous No.6645272]

>>6645239
It is gratifying and you know it.

[Anonymous No.6645288]

>>6645008
Judging by your reply, you just consoom art and see no value to it other than being pretty etc. Merely a means to an end. God I hope the world isn't filled with the likes of you in the future because that's a recipe for societal decay.

Humans make art because it's always a form of communication. Its for conveying whatever they feel like conveying (for instance, a desire for cute anime girls, a peculiar curiosity with morbidity, a fascination with the anatomy of a hand etc.)

Generated art will always be soulless for all eternity because there's no human effort placed into it even if you happen to make a bajillion artworks with SD/Midjourney/whatever tech is in the future. It may communicate, but it will always be a compromise, just like having some guy speak for you in a different language instead of you learning the language and speaking directly.

But sure, let's just let thing go haywire. I'm sure the internet will find bajillions of generated images more useful than something that is actually real. It will have absolutely no consequences in the future yeah totally

[Anonymous No.6645343]

>>6645239
post your art

[Anonymous No.6645360]

So AI art thread? Here's some things I proompted a while ago, I think they look pretty neat. Can you figure out the artist names I used? There's 3 of them!

[Anonymous No.6645367]

>"I will not let AI steal my art!"
>Furry babyfur artist
>Picrel is what AI is good at
Yeah buddy, I don't want your shitty "art" infecting my weights either

[Anonymous No.6645371]

I like messing with colors, some aesthetically pleasing results for "black and white and [color]" (in this case gold)

[Anonymous No.6645376]

Mashine anime and realism models together gives some nice results, surprisingly

[Anonymous No.6645378]

Pink as a theme also has some nice results

[Anonymous No.6645385]

And with this red one I'm gonna stop, don't wanna flood a perfectly good thread. Keep proompting anons! Some great art to be generated out there

[Anonymous No.6645390]

>>6644161
Fucking kill yourself nigger
LMFAO even

[Anonymous No.6645396]

>>6645360
none asked
kill yourself

[Anonymous No.6645400]

>>6645360
>>6645367
>>6645378
Beautiful work fren.

[Anonymous No.6645407]

>work

[Anonymous No.6645414]

For me it's generating elves especially using FFT styles. I also love the random stuff on /g/, the hentai on /h/, and the weird shit on /b/.

[Anonymous No.6645415]

>>6645414
Moron

[Anonymous No.6645418]

cannae wait for the day all promptfaggots end their miserable lives after their dopamine receptors finish drying up, what a massive waste of oxygen they are

[Anonymous No.6645424]

>>6645415
What do you mean?

[Anonymous No.6645426]

>>6645424
You're 'tarded.

[Anonymous No.6645431]

>>6645426
Prove it.

[Anonymous No.6645433]

>>6645424
yeah, im going to need an upscaled version of all the images in this set

[Anonymous No.6645434]

>>6644958
>To each and their own.
I have no gripe with them pursuing art simply for money. I could not care about ai pictures more than just calling it for how it is.
The issue i have is when they clearly impose their shallow mentality upon everyone by flooding communities with the goal and only meaning to talk about and pursue art only for money and drowning out any other artistic talk, while attracting more of their kin which in turn further brings down the decline of any community, much like we have seen in the last year with anons mostly having actual discussions and engaging somewhat seriously when it's about social media and how to get followers and by extension, this is what art then became about; not to actually create but a tool to amass a following to then receive money and any piece of art that doesn't fit the "specific criteria" for making money in the current consumer climate, isn't worth anything because the average anon is here to just market himself and "network", not to actually engage and learn about art.
This is much like ai posters flooding the board with their shitty threads spamming how it makes artists mad that they generate meaningless images of nude anime women, whereas it just annoys everyone who just wants to draw and talk about art.
Those other anons who also produce nude anime women, don't give a shit either since they're too busy networking and marketing themselves but with shit like this you're only inviting non-artists on the board who give even less of a shit about art.
Not to mention that every ai thread is bait and trolling while they samefag hard.

tldr don't come here if you actually don't give a shit about art and learning; only autistic retards with lots to say like me will ever respond in your shitty threads

[Anonymous No.6645458]

>>6645431
>likes AI
>posts AI
>proompts instead of doing literally anything else with his time
he doesn't need to prove anything

[Anonymous No.6645461]

>>6644161
I usually always prefer human-made, BUT, I can respect when AI art is heavily edited and had clear user input in it. I'm almost 100% sure Zumi uses AI art in his artwork today, but you can obviously tell there's still his own input taken into the artwork. HOWEVER, who knows how long it'll be 'till you can just use AI and get a perfect result. At that point, it'll truly just be easily made slop and then 2D art on the internet will have even less value than it already has today.

[Anonymous No.6645464]

>>6645458
>>6645433
You realize sperging at random people that use SD or midjourney is just going to make regular people resent us more? Take your anger out on the people that made this shit, not the ones that use it, otherwise, don't be surprised when everyone is cheering for our death.

[Anonymous No.6645467]

>>6645434
>This is much like ai posters flooding the board with their shitty threads spamming how it makes artists mad
They only say that because artists, or whoever, are actually and unironically mad and express it as much as they can. There would be zero mention of such a thing if people weren't flipping their shit whenever they see an AI image. In a perfect world it would just be art, like it is, and people wouldn't start freaking out at the mere hint of AI. I've seen people get mad at human made art because they thought it was AI. This is spastic behavior and it does get fun to goad such people.
>tldr don't come here if you actually don't give a shit about art and learning
I'm not him but I come here for art and teaching. AI is a cool new form of illustration and you all need to realize that already. It's not going away.

>>6645458
>has good taste
>produce good stuff
>has a hobby
So I'm based?

[Anonymous No.6645485]

>>6645467
>invade art spaces everywhere
>keep spamming everywhere
>always go out of you way to bother people with ai
>be retarded
>never make an insightful intelligent post
>get called a retard
>"people are just mad and jealous and sperging wow epic troll gottem checkmate"
>implying the sperging isn't all samefagging and falseflagging
Bruh, this shit is just the other side of the same retarded coin.

No one wants to learn ai since it defeats the purpose of drawing and learning to draw.
You should bother people on twitter since you can have public reactions saved and linked to actual people and potentially get rich and famous instead of having follower bots and further beating the dead horse that is this board.

[Anonymous No.6645495]

>>6645485
>posting art in art spaces
>bad
Stopped reading here.

[Anonymous No.6645496]

>>6645485
>ai since it defeats the purpose of drawing
AI is a new kind of drawing. You draw with your mind. This is just a new tool that has a major learning curve. It's prompt engineering, model selection, fine tuning, post processing.

[Anonymous No.6645499]

>>6645485
Don't bother replying to the obvious troll. It's sad the nigger janny won't do anything about it though.

[Anonymous No.6645504]

>>6645496
This. Prompting is an intermediate until people have brain chips sucking art right out of their minds.

[Anonymous No.6645507]

[Anonymous No.6645508]

>>6645461
If "AI" gets so good that it can shit out high quality pictures, videos, text, speech...
the Information Age will be fucking over and humanity will enter the Information Dark Ages. Word of mouth will become the essential (and inapt) conductor of truths because all forms of digital communication will be filled with fake information.
It would be great if AIdiots would understand that not all technological progress is good. There is a moral line which should not be violated.

What good is this AI stuff really? To consume, consume, consume, to ever greater heights? To escape, escape, escape, farther away from reality? Is that why you would willingly take the chance of a dystopian future? Doesn't this seem counter-productive? Why have you given up on life?
Don't.

[Anonymous No.6645509]

>6645496
>AI is a new kind of drawing. You draw with your mind.
The entire appeal of man-made art is that it's made with human hands.
>6645504
>Prompting is an intermediate until people have brain chips sucking art right out of their minds.
Misidentifying the craft of drawing as art is the one confusion prompters and /ic/ beginners have in common.

Ban AI threads.

[Anonymous No.6645513]

>>6645509
>The entire appeal of man-made art is that it's made with human hands.
Which AI art still is. Keep in mind "hands" is a metaphor, you can use your feet, voice, mind, or legs to create art too.
>Misidentifying the craft of drawing
I agree here. Art is a product, the craft is just a craft.

Stop being retarded.

[Anonymous No.6645516]

>>6645508
>NO YOU CAN'T JUST MAKE AND ENJOY THINGS YOU LIKE STOP IT AHHHHHH BAD THINGS WILL HAPPEN
Nothing bad will happen, only good things are coming. People will keep on living. Except the delirious troons like you, they won't make it.

[Anonymous No.6645520]

The amount of salt in this thread is insane lmao artcels on suicidewatch

[Anonymous No.6645522]

>6645513
>Which AI art still is. Keep in mind "hands" is a metaphor, you can use your feet, voice, mind, or legs to create art too.
It isn't because it's not your hands doing the drawing. If you tell someone to sing a song and they do, you didn't sing it. If you use your foot to direct someone to sculpt, you didn't sculpt with your foot.
>Stop being retarded.
Stop arguing in bad faith, it's really obvious that you're trolling. Just seek whatever psychiatric help you need for whatever disorder makes you beg for attention online in such a pathetic way.

[Anonymous No.6645529]

>>6645496
you're just a low effort commissioner consuming fast food computer imagery. You're not doing shit with your mind unless you can use it to set the finest detail as you want it. Drawing with the mind is exactly what actual artists do

[Anonymous No.6645530]

>>6645508
Chill dude, I was just saying if human craftsmanship is involved then it's fine. Yes, I agree that not all progress is good progress. Yes, AI is more than likely going to be used to just consume to greater degrees. I'm aware of all of that, what do you want me to do about it? Sperging on basket-weaving forums wont help your or my case. I still draw and do the shit I want because I know the only thing that changes is me, the rest of the world goes on irrespective of what I want it to be.

[Anonymous No.6645531]

>>6645516
innit
just consume, never question anything and be happy

[Anonymous No.6645536]

>>6645513
sure, and the commissioner is an artist, not the painter who follows the request right?

[Anonymous No.6645537]

>>6645516
Yeah, people like me will be dead because we won't willingly get that "fashionable" brain chip implant. Is that the future you wish for?

[Anonymous No.6645538]

>>6645520
ywnbaa

[Anonymous No.6645541]

>>6645495
>posting art
>its all the same anime grill floating in a void looking at the viewer
>doesn't bother actually giving the "art" narrative
>"just look at the pretty pictures WOW!"
>implying
There are other boards where you can just spam pictures.
>>6645496
Ai doesn't teach me the basics or teach me the skills to draw.
There is no purpose in just creating finished artwork with it's only merit being that "it looks good, rendered well and appealing to consumers so that they might give me money".
If you want to be cattle, good for you, but please go be a goy somewhere else.
>>6645499
Who do you think might be replying to them, Anon-kun?
It's either me or they're samefagging.
I get to post my art and they get to out themselves as unthinking animals.

[Anonymous No.6645543]

>>6645522
It metaphorically is your hands, you're operating a computer and software. Just like any digital artist but it requires a higher intellect opposed to dexterity. AI is not a person, it's a tool.
>Stop arguing in bad faith
You first. Stop making baseless attacks like a child. You're so angry that you're wasting your time messing up your hyperlinks lol.

>>6645529
And what are you doing? You're no different, you just have more shallow taste and act out emotionally.

>>6645536
Read above.

>>6645537
>schizophrenic poltard nonsense
Why are brain chips being developed? To save lives firstly, secondly they're to improve lives. I won't get one myself but be reasonable.

[Anonymous No.6645546]

>>6644161
You don't get to draw 10000000000 windows by hand lmfao

[Anonymous No.6645547]

If our appearances were based not on physical characteristics but on our souls, as in not the visual but the way we think act and communicate, then AI troons would be the ugliest motherfuckers on the planet.

[Anonymous No.6645548]

>>6645541
>literally bragging that your tastes in art are shallow and that you can't appreciate the beautiful female form
>doesn't like anime, posts on 4chan
Yikes!
Also you don't understand the process of creating AI art, it can take you as long to finish as you want it to.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K0ldxCh3cnI

>There are other boards where you can just spam pictures.
Who is spamming pictures? lol

[Anonymous No.6645552]

ai art is boring

[Anonymous No.6645557]

>>6645548
>"coom is the epitome and peak of art"
>implying
>"WOW YIKES GOTTEM CHECKMATE"
>"you just dont understand automated photoshop that has a a library of tagged pictures which then takes those tagged pictures based on the commands it gets and repixelates them into endless variations! WOW!"
>wow is spamming images lol u are lmao
Now let me see how you draw

[Anonymous No.6645560]

>>6645400
Thank you fren! I love making these. Spend way too much time calibrating

[Anonymous No.6645561]

>>6645557
>more strawman arguments from an art hater
You couldn't be more pathetic.

[Anonymous No.6645562]

I want ONE of the people that is losing their minds over AI art to post ONE piece they have drawn. They never seem to do so, do they? Not even on twitter or reddit or wherever... I wonder why hmmmm

[Anonymous No.6645565]

>>6645561
That would imply that i care what a waste of oxygen and megabytes like you thinks.
>>6645562
Maybe because no one is actually losing their minds over ai and the outrage is all fake and transsexual?

[Anonymous No.6645566]

>>6645565
>Maybe because no one is actually losing their minds over ai and the outrage is all fake and transsexual?
sanest person itt

[Anonymous No.6645572]

>>6645565
this nigga again

[Anonymous No.6645573]

>>6645562
In my experience they're usually faggots or troons and I wish I was exaggerating. They always draw homo shit and that's it. Zero finished works, absolutely nothing impressive, evocative, or aesthetic. Even if you get them to simply post works they like because they're ashamed of their own work, it's almost always just garbage. They're spiritually dead people that viciously hate anything beautiful or better than them.

>>6645565
This anon is a rare example, he doesn't seem to be a literal faggot he's just a salty child that draws like he's in the third grade.

[Anonymous No.6645576]

>>6645548
i knew it was the vox video before i even opened the link lmao. He's just photo bashing AI images....and that makes him an "AI" artist somehow. wooo who the fuck cares?

[Anonymous No.6645577]

>>6645565
>sperg keeps sperging

keep seething

[Anonymous No.6645578]

>>6644161
>do you still hate
Yes. Fuck you.

[Anonymous No.6645579]

>>6645573
why do AI cucks ask others to post their drawings? shouldn't you ask people to post their copy pasted prompts?

[Anonymous No.6645580]

>>6645579
axing the real questions

[Anonymous No.6645583]

>>6645565
You know that by drawing badly you're not impressing anyone?
I am not impressed no one is.
Keep seething.

[Anonymous No.6645584]

>>6645576
He's making art. The means never mattered.

>>6645579
They don't. Why are you acting so defensive?

[Anonymous No.6645589]

>>6645565
based

[Anonymous No.6645591]

>>6645485
I guarantee you, AI hating spergs are a billion times worse and more annoying than AI users.

AI users are just posting good art they liked from generating with this new novel technology and seeing how it goes or what you can create with it and in every thread and twitter comment about AI you get spergs like (you) saying ree it's not real art AI should be banned REAL art is when you need 5 paragraphs to explain it and also soul and also human experience and other giga autistic shit.

You probably don't even draw more than anime girls, if you even draw.

[Anonymous No.6645600]

>>6645591
AI hating spergs don't exist, it's all (you) trannies.
Pic related took me like 5 minutes and purely from imagination.
>Inb4 waaaaah u lie beg schizo
I am superior, even to a machine.
You transartists need every bit of tech to mimic a fraction of my autistic power.

[Anonymous No.6645603]

>>6645600
i forgot pic lmao

[Anonymous No.6645606]

saving this for posterity

[Anonymous No.6645608]

>>6645603
based
>>6645606
cringe

[Anonymous No.6645609]

>>6645600
>>6645603
based and artpilled
aishitters btfo

[Anonymous No.6645611]

>>6645603
Damn dude you absolutely obliterated my anus with your merc_wip

[Anonymous No.6645616]

>>6645579
I just think it's weird, I literally am simply curious about what the art of the people that hate AI's with a passion is. Is it technically good? Is it soulful? Is it cartoon piranha flowers voring jojo characters? I JUST WANT TO KNOW
Btw here's the prompt I used for this:
>(((Black and white and gold))). Ink drawing of a (naked) ((girl)) with (detailed face), [smiling]. (((Pale))) skin. Exposed midriff. Short ((blonde)) hair. (Bangs). ((Jewellery)). Greg Ratkowski, Alphonse Mucha, Moebius.
>Negatives: (frame), (border), ((psychedelic)), (((text))), ((signature)), ((geometric shapes)), (((abstract))), (((halo))), (((duplicate))), ((morbid)), ((mutilated)), [out of frame], extra fingers, mutated hands, ((poorly drawn hands)), ((poorly drawn face)), (((mutation))), (((deformed))), blurry, ((bad anatomy)), (((bad proportions))), ((extra limbs)), cloned face, (((disfigured))), gross proportions, (malformed limbs), ((missing arms)), ((missing legs)), (((extra arms))), (((extra legs))), (fused fingers), (too many fingers), (((long neck)))
Seed is in filename but the model is one I've made by mashing a bunch together, try it out on anywhere else though <3

[Anonymous No.6645617]

>>6645543
>Why are brain chips being developed? To save lives firstly, secondly they're to improve lives. I won't get one myself but be reasonable.
You do know what the super-rich that are funding all of this are talking about ever other week, right? They are obviously batshit insane with delusions of grandeur but many people love them because they are rich. The rich don't care about saving or improving anyone's life but their own, and they will do anything for it. Be reasonable.
Would it be ok to implant chips into babies to increase their IQ? Just in case I'll tell you that this is a rhetorical question and the answer is "no".
>>6645591
>also soul and also human experience and other giga autistic shit
Artists actually care about other things than only consuming, like creating and thinking. AI users equate humans with machines and only care about consumption.

[Anonymous No.6645618]

>>6645617
You are schizophrenic and need help.

[Anonymous No.6645620]

>>6645603
nice
>>6645611
merc_wip is all ai shits out

[Anonymous No.6645623]

>>6645617
The problem with anti-AI sentiment is that it is a paradox. On the one hand "art cannot be made by a machine!" but on the other, "Artists will starve because they will be replaced!" So which is it? If it's not art, how will it replace it? The truth of the matter is AI isn't replacing anything, it's only a new kind of art and idiots are losing their minds because they want to pretend they're "real artists" concerned with "real artist issues", instead of just getting good enough at their craft that they don't have to feel insecure by anything.

[Anonymous No.6645624]

>>6645603
blog?

[Anonymous No.6645626]

>>6645618
Why do you think so? At least give reasons if you're going to internet-diagnose someone.

[Anonymous No.6645629]

>>6645600
>Pic related took me like 5 minutes and purely from imagination.
x to doubt

[Anonymous No.6645631]

>>6645603
How about a finished piece you lil rascal

[Anonymous No.6645632]

>>6645603
based

soul

ai btfo

[Anonymous No.6645636]

>>6645565
>fake and transsexual
Just like the people commissioning art from the Rick And Morty Interdimensional Cable box who, much like trannies, cannot simply be their "true selves" but must also force the entire world to validate their mental illness.
You guys already have your TransAIrtist safe spaces yet you constantly come here to try to convince us that you are, in fact, a real girl. Curious!

[Anonymous No.6645638]

>>6645603
I'd rather have this than whatever you do
keep being mad, sperg

[Anonymous No.6645639]

>>6645603
See what I mean? They always draw gay shit and they can't finish a single work. These people aren't artists and that's why they seethe at AI. All the people praising this post are no different.

[Anonymous No.6645641]

>>6645623
>On the one hand "art cannot be made by a machine!" but on the other, "Artists will starve because they will be replaced!" So which is it?
It's both. It just shows artists' angst and that you don't comprehend basic logic. Even if society decided to label AI image generators as "artists" and their output as "art", it does not become so.

[Anonymous No.6645642]

>Post your art
>Fine! Here it is! Heh blown away yet?
>It's literally a 5 minute sketch of some muscles
do artcels really, how about something actually finished that your ability can be judged on lmao

[Anonymous No.6645643]

>>6645641
So what you're essentially saying is
>Non-art will replace art
Yeah, people are suddenly going to stop enjoying meaningful and soulful art because AI's can technically outperform your typical furry twitter artist. Makes perfect logical sense

[Anonymous No.6645644]

>>6645636
How does AI make better coomer art than 99% of anime artist? Like you rarely see them draw boobs that don't look like bolt ons and any kind of muscle definition. The coomer art most people make is so flat and boring. There are barely any anime artists who draw athletic women who have abs but aren't muscular freaks. AI is my savior for coomer images.

[Anonymous No.6645645]

>>6645638
>>6645639
A little in awe at this schizoid artcel thinking without a hint of irony his shitty boring drawing absolutely dumpstered and btfo AI art

[Anonymous No.6645646]

>>6645636
I like your picture very much and you have high IQ. Cheers.
6645639
6645642
>waaah post your work
>waaaah post your finished work
>waaaaah you only draw men and ur gay
>waaaaah you only draw anime girls just post your social security number
>waaaaah ur so mad soooooo mad sperg lol schizo waaaaaaah STOP PRAISING IT WAAAAAAAAH I DONT LIKE IT I CANT CONSUME IT WAAAAAH
>YOU ARE SEEETHING WAAAAH
All you're doing is giving me an excuse to post my drawings.
I don't really give a shit what you think and say when in fact you're only going out of your way to show how much YOU are the ones seething and coping

[Anonymous No.6645647]

>>6645616
>art of the people that hate AI's with a passion
Surely you've heard of Karla Ortiz?

[Anonymous No.6645648]

>>6645647
*And shit, you can't deny you've heard of Greg rutkowski.

[Anonymous No.6645649]

>>6645603
>the drawing that made ai trannies lose their collective shit

[Anonymous No.6645652]

>>6645600
>>6645603
holy based

[Anonymous No.6645653]

Why do people here keep thinking that anyone with an interest in new technology is on "team AI"? It's not that deep. You can be interested in AI without making it your core identity.

[Anonymous No.6645656]

>>6645603
this is really not that impressive

post your actual work instead of some beg drawing

[Anonymous No.6645660]

>>6645647
>>6645648
Not him but those people hate AI art because they have low IQs, their arguments are completely retarded. And they're drops in an ocean of people seething about AI.

[Anonymous No.6645667]

>>6645660
That doesn't seem right. I know Greg hates it because it is drowning out his actual art online.

[Anonymous No.6645673]

>>6645646

[Anonymous No.6645674]

>>6645645
Yet you need a whole army of fuming discord trannies to damage control my shitty boring drawings

[Anonymous No.6645676]

>>6645653
Because AI """artists""" are really shallow people? You see it in the spam that they generate, you read it in the repetitive arguments that they use.

[Anonymous No.6645677]

>>6645674
I dont know what to tell you, man

take your meds or something

[Anonymous No.6645678]

>>6645673
Now do this, promptmonkey >>6645674

[Anonymous No.6645679]

>>6645667
No one has ever produced art that looks like his, using his name. His name being used in prompts was a meme that came from a bot. It made him very famous and took nothing from him, that he hates it is completely and utterly moronic.

[Anonymous No.6645681]

>>6645673
why did you paste a vectored generic anime face on anon's doodle

[Anonymous No.6645685]

>>6645677
>"trannies are not real and if you say so...
>...LOL LMAO TAKE UR MEDS SCHIZO"
I'll take this as yet another absolute win, tranny.

btw this is a schizo board
you're free to leave if you don't want to around schizos

[Anonymous No.6645686]

>>6645679
Nigger his name turned overnight from the name of an artist to a proof of concept that Emad Mosque's image melting toy is a force to be reckoned with.

[Anonymous No.6645692]

>>6645679
>>6645686
I think the issue was that a lot of his art was part of a free-to-use library, had anatomically correct humans and was also very well-tagged by him because he has a hard-on for disabled people or something

[Anonymous No.6645694]

>>6645686
Learn to read you idiot.

>>6645692
His name was in most of the millions of prompts from Lexica, which used a bot to produce images as advertising. Lexica was not a site you could upload prompts to but you could copy the prompts. None of the art looks like Greg's because his style isn't even in the system, because like you say it was well-tagged for random shit.
So basically Greg is retarded. Karla even more-so, she's a woman first off.

[Anonymous No.6645695]

>>6645679
>It made him very famous
Not really. I bet 99% of people using his name in prompts never look at his work.

[Anonymous No.6645697]

>>6645681
I thought it would be fun.

[Anonymous No.6645699]

>>6645697
right hand is floating, but otherwise cool pic

[Anonymous No.6645700]

>>6645694
His name was the default suggestion prompt for one of the generators prior to sd, disco diffusion.

[Anonymous No.6645701]

>>6645695
Sympathetic artists followed him like crazy.

[Anonymous No.6645702]

>>6645694
>millions of prompts from Lexica, which used a bot to produce images as advertising.
Lexica scrapped the stable diffusion discord for all it's prompts.(mostly from the closed beta). Not bot generated.

[Anonymous No.6645705]

>>6645702
>>6645700
Thanks for informing me.

[Anonymous No.6645706]

>>6645695
Reminds me how /g/ used Bach as a prompt to produce stuff similar in style to Bach's most well-known portrait instead of the name of the artist of said portrait.

[Anonymous No.6645707]

>>6645603
How will AIniggers ever recover from this?

[Anonymous No.6645708]

>>6645701
He only have 29.8k followers, that's nothing given the scale of the situation. How many did he gain since ai blew up? 5k?

[Anonymous No.6645709]

>>6645697
Do this now.

[Anonymous No.6645713]

>>6645708
Over 100k on artstation. Also
>only
How many do you have?

[Anonymous No.6645714]

>>6645713
24k, on insta though, probably a lot are bots, I only get about 500 likes per pic

[Anonymous No.6645716]

>>6644161
I like AI art. And I hope you find success in it, but you will never get an honest answer because /ic/ is contrarian and will eternally seethe at the mere mention of it.

[Anonymous No.6645720]

>>6645716
Do you like AI art for it's artistic qualities or just the fact it's AI art?

[Anonymous No.6645722]

>>6645716
>contrarian
Sure that, and it's a board for artists. Ai artists are not real artists no matter how much hrt you take.

[Anonymous No.6645724]

>>6645720
I don't even look at it for more than a second, I like it because of the seethe it generates.

[Anonymous No.6645725]

>>6645720
Technology is cool and is a massive step forward for mankind. It can look very good with enough editing too.

[Anonymous No.6645726]

>>6645720
im not even that guy but I think it's wild that anyone would think AI art is only liked for contrarian reasons when there's a ton of pretty good AI art floating around the internet now

[Anonymous No.6645733]

>>6645697
Nice one anon! Here's my attempt, not as good as yours but I tried

[Anonymous No.6645735]

You are not an artist. I will never accept you as an artist. You are a commissioner pulling up images from the Rick And Morty™ Interdimensional G***le Search™, nothing more and nothing less.

To put it quite simply, we are nothing alike. We have nothing in common. You do not even exist on the plane of reality that I inhabit.
I am a creator. You are a consumer. No amount of distorted big titty anime girls that you churn out of your machine learning models like the Federal Reserve prints money will ever make (You), or your "art", worth anything. You didn't create it. You don't own it. You have no rights to it. There is no place for you anywhere, in any art community, and you will not create your own because deep down your "art" is born of idle thoughts and no effort, then just as quickly discarded in equal fashion, and it does not satisfy you.
At the end of the day, this "democratized"- or should I say, "socialized"- McArt™ leaves you completely undifferentiated from everyone else.
You own nothing, and you are not happy.

[Anonymous No.6645740]

>>6645733
That glow effect is really cool, how'd you do that?

>>6645735
>>6645722
Cope and seethe.

[Anonymous No.6645741]

>>6645735
your post made me seethe like never before. give me a minute to calm down before I rebuke it.

[Anonymous No.6645744]

>>6645740
Dialate

[Anonymous No.6645747]

>>6645740
The model I use (0.7 anythingv4.5 and 0.3 f222) tends to be pretty glowy. I think maybe it's because of the VAE I have to use with it? Not sure since I'm not even sure what the VAE does lol, but without it everything is gray and matte.

[Anonymous No.6645750]

kek

[Anonymous No.6645751]

>>6645458
Starve

[Anonymous No.6645752]

>Most people hate AI art (even non artists)
>Any company that has tried to get involved with AI art has instantly been shit on
>More regulations are coming for AI soon

This shit died faster than NFTs. Give it a few months and the only people who will have any interest in it are schizos like this: >>6645733

I've seen this guy spam his shitty prompts on multiple boards and the saddest thing is I think he replies to himself when the thread begins to die down

[Anonymous No.6645754]

I'm a fan of ai art myself. i don't think it's a bad thing. It's cool. I tried so hard to draw this style for so long. I had so many references on my computer. I would try to break them own into proportions and measure out the head, and i would zoom in on the lines to try to figure out what the artist to get their lines nice. i would draw pages of just eyes, pages of just mouths. it was never good. so once ai came out i took those references and i trained a model, and now i can prompt thee characters. it's fine.

the problem arises only because this is an artwork critique board. you're supposed to be on /ic/ posting your artwork and looking for critique to help you improve.

when you generate ai artwork, that's not something that artists are going to give you critique on. we can't tell you what sliders to adjust or what prompts to try. there are other places for that.

i recommend /g/.

but this board is for drawing and painting.

[Anonymous No.6645756]

>>6645752
>I've seen this guy spam his shitty prompts on multiple boards and the saddest thing is I think he replies to himself when the thread begins to die down
I hope you're trolling because otherwise you really need your meds

[Anonymous No.6645757]

>>6645747
Thanks. You can learn more about VAEs here.
https://rentry.org/sdvae

[Anonymous No.6645759]

>>6645754
>but this board is for drawing and painting.
It's for Artwork/Critique.

[Anonymous No.6645760]

>>6645752
Cope&rope.
AI shits out far better images than (you).

[Anonymous No.6645761]

>>6645504
ftfy

[Anonymous No.6645762]

drawing cute dogs is fun :3.

[Anonymous No.6645763]

>>6645733
>>6645740
look at this cute little artist roleplay
>we're artists supporting each other just like real artists

[Anonymous No.6645764]

>>6645761
based

[Anonymous No.6645767]

>>6645761
>hand drawn booba
unacceptable

[Anonymous No.6645766]

>>6645763
are u ok?

[Anonymous No.6645768]

>>6645766
he's right. your larping and trying to seem as if you're putting effort at "improving" is fucking cringe.

[Anonymous No.6645773]

>>6645766
I'm coping and seething, all night long, sweet Suzie.

[Anonymous No.6645774]

>>6645768
I hope you feel better anon and you find a cool artist with which you can support each other <3

[Anonymous No.6645777]

>>6645774
stop making me cringe! I'm about to slip a disk in my back.

[Anonymous No.6645778]

>>6645768
>>6645773
there there
>actually getting mad that two artists just supported each other

[Anonymous No.6645781]

>>6645752
Actually malding. AI is the future old man.

[Anonymous No.6645783]

>>6645778
>that two artists
kekeekekkeekek

[Anonymous No.6645786]

>>6645774
>>6645778
>>6645781
>>/g/

[Anonymous No.6645789]

Art is theft.

[Anonymous No.6645791]

>>6645752
>most people don't care about ai art
>aitrannies keep pushing it and call you mad, salty cope seething when you tell them to take it on the appropriate boards
Well, they did out themselves as nothing but consumers like other anons have said.
Let's analyze these derivate copies:
>>6645733
>>6645697
>>6645673
All these did is apply a filter and add some colors and highlights.
The worst thing is that they didn't even bother to correct the actual mistakes in the original drawing, such as the gloves and the ghost writing and drawing in the picture.
Not to speak of why the original picture was made, and even if it is some big titty anime girl, it has context and a narrative, basically elevating it above any generated derivative picture of the original.
On the surface and without context, even the original is kitsch, thus the derivative copies are worse than the original since they aim to improve on the original by virtue of adding a new coat of paint, since they show that all they care about is the technical expression of a piece.

This is why aitrannies will never be real artists; they don't think, they don't express anything, they just want to consume the pretty pictures.

And not to mention it took me less that 5 minutes drawing that from imagination as well because you really don't need a machine to do such simple work.

[Anonymous No.6645792]

>>6645789
beautiful. who's stolen signature is that?

[Anonymous No.6645794]

>>6645464
Nah, it has the sole purpose of keeping retards in their place, aka not here.

Nobody cares about the spam shit you prompted, and making more spam doesn't makes it more valuable, it makes it even less valuable than before.

[Anonymous No.6645801]

>>6645792
It's no one's signature, it's just noise emulating a signature because the AI thinks that's what it should do. AI doesn't copy anything, it only generalizes from data and somehow makes a model of the world based on that (no one really knows how), it's not like it mashes together a bunch of stored pictures lol. That's why it's ridiculous to claim it copies anything, it really is imagining things on its own. Not in the same way as humans do, obviously, but still.

[Anonymous No.6645802]

>>6645794
You clearly care and the only retard in any room is you.

[Anonymous No.6645805]

>>6645801
complete and utter bullshit, as a lot of these AI images have signatures of artists I recognize
>That's why it's ridiculous to claim it copies anything, it really is imagining things on its own. Not in the same way as humans do, obviously, but still.
it's ridiculous to claim it imagines anything. it really is copying things, not in the same way as humans do obviously, but still

[Anonymous No.6645811]

>>6645805
>complete and utter bullshit, as a lot of these AI images have signatures of artists I recognize
Post one.

[Anonymous No.6645813]

>>6645801
>somehow makes a model of the world based on that (no one really knows how)
>That's why it's ridiculous to claim it copies anything
That's why it's ridiculous to claim it doesn't steal anything.

[Anonymous No.6645814]

Shit is painfully generic.

Drawings are imprinted with life, but all AI art looks dead like the corpse of zombies.

Dead looking pictures, all of them a bit repulsive to look at.

[Anonymous No.6645817]

>>6645811
>HURRR POST ONE
god I fucking hate AIroaches. why are you so despicable in your denial?
>https://i.imgur.com/aKIyrRh.jpg

[Anonymous No.6645821]

Let AI art die a natural death anon, no point in trying to force it to be a thing... It's time to let it go, metaverse and NFTs are calling, let AI art go towards the light and find peace.

[Anonymous No.6645825]

>>6645756
>>6645760
>>6645781

>Not a single point refuted

Just admit that you guys lost. Artstation doesn't want you, twitter doesn't want you, /ic/ definitely doesn't want you and places like pixiv have literally banned you. Nobody will ever hire you to "prompt" for them (lmao) and artists keep getting hired everyday.

In a few months all you'll be doing is spamming art communities like /ic/. I suppose for now you can still post on DeviantArt. AI art is on the same level as diaper stuff anyway

[Anonymous No.6645828]

>>6645805
>it's ridiculous to claim it imagines anything. it really is copying things, not in the same way as humans do obviously, but still
The difference here being that I base my statements on the facts of the nature of AI and you are just repeating what I said but in reverse
>>6645813
>That's why it's ridiculous to claim it doesn't steal anything.
Only in the same way that looking at a bunch of pictures and then drawing in that style is "stealing".
>>6645817
It's not impossible to see actual signatures with AI. It depends on the model. If you train a model specifically on one artist's pictures (which many people do) then it can become a part of it.

[Anonymous No.6645831]

>>6645825
You can't "ban AI".
All the places that try, are only banning themselves from being competitive.

[Anonymous No.6645833]

>>6645817
They aren't the same.

[Anonymous No.6645835]

>>6645821
There are literally millions of AI artists... It's not dying, it's getting more popular.

[Anonymous No.6645838]

Midjourney 5. You have never made anything this appealing, and you never will.

[Anonymous No.6645840]

>>6645825
No one fucking cares about artstation. I guarantee you don't even post your work there, you're probably a twitter troon anyways.
>art communities like /ic/.
LMAO, the only communities akin to /ic/ were the drawthreads on differing boards, all of which hate the /ic/ fanaticism artists and have dedicated AI threads within the boards. Literally one of the most popular technological advancements of the new decade, you've already lost.

[Anonymous No.6645841]

>>6645828
>Only in the same way
same way? come the fuck on bro

[Anonymous No.6645844]

>>6645833
pure fucking copium

[Anonymous No.6645845]

>>6645831
>You can't "ban AI".
>All the places that try, are only banning themselves from being competitive
Why not? Plenty of art places before ai banned other types of art, you don't post a pencil sketch to a pixel form and you don't post western art to an anime only boorus and this was fine. So why is AI magical enough to get an exemption?

[Anonymous No.6645847]

6645838
Are we just bored artists trolling each other itt? or are there real ai trannies amogus?

[Anonymous No.6645852]

>>6645838
why don't you ask the artist whose coat tail you're riding? what would he think about that statement. it is after all him who you're comparing yourself with

[Anonymous No.6645853]

>>6645825
Artstation wants AI artists. Pixiv didn't ban me and more AI art gets posted there than human art. Twitter wants me too, Elon Musk likes AI art.
AI is being adopted by all the big players too. Blizzard, Nvidia, Adobe, Shuttershock, Getty, etc.

[Anonymous No.6645856]

>>6645838
The teeth in this one is really good. Pic related was an older generated skelebro. Good to see some progress.

[Anonymous No.6645857]

>>6645853
>sucking Tim Sweeney's dick dry
holy fuck lmao. why are you rooting for this and corporations though? you went from larping as an anarchist to sucking corporate dick

[Anonymous No.6645860]

>>6645841
Of course in the same way. It really escapes most people how this type of AI works and how scary it actually is. Because it does the same thing a person does, only in a completely different and alien way, with backpropagation. Which could easily surpass what we do and probably will in any way that matters (and I'm not just talking about art here). But I digress, my point is it really doesn't store any pictures whatsoever, it genuinely is creating these images out of noise, "hallucinating" them if you will.

[Anonymous No.6645861]

>>6645856
fantastic progress AI sister. you should place it in a "terminator if it was an 80's fantasy movie" compilation on YouTube

[Anonymous No.6645862]

>>6645844
This one isn't even similar...

[Anonymous No.6645863]

female scene cat drinking appie juice
- Leonardo Da Vinci, 2023

[Anonymous No.6645864]

>""artists"" have to rely on censorship and platform banning to have even a sliver of a chance to remain relevant
It's actually over.

[Anonymous No.6645866]

>>6645860
true. just like CPU's are basically just human brains bro
>and how scary it actually is
are you a literal redditor or twitterfag?

[Anonymous No.6645868]

>>6645857
>holy fuck lmao. why are you rooting for this and corporations though?
I'm helping you cope with reality. Nothing regarding AI will ever go your way. Get over it.
>you went from larping as an anarchist to sucking corporate dick
Who are you talking about, schizo?

[Anonymous No.6645872]

>>6645860
>Because it does the same thing a person does, only in a completely different and alien way
Ok, lets imagine for a minute it is an alien, and it does work in the same way. What makes this acceptable? I reject alien art from my human art communities. it has no right to the images it learned from, it is not human.

[Anonymous No.6645874]

>>6645866
Just watch any interview with one of the creators of AI or anyone with any programming knowledge analyzing it for the layperson. It's pretty interesting

[Anonymous No.6645876]

>AI cucks think that everyone will love their thieving slop and safeguarding your work from parasites is a sign of that
I'm surprised AIroaches didn't come out of the woodwork to deliver their hot takes about how artists are wrong to demand their work not be used to sell merchandise by others

[Anonymous No.6645878]

>>6645872
No one cares what a random sperg rejects. And it isn't alien, it's human built to create art better than you.

[Anonymous No.6645880]

>I'm helping you cope with reality. Nothing regarding AI will ever go your way. Get over it.

[Anonymous No.6645881]

>>6645861
on it! I might do a balenciaga one too. what if terminator balenciaga?! holy shit this is gonna be great lmfao

[Anonymous No.6645882]

>>6645872
I don't know if it's acceptable, or art, or whatever. I just think it's pretty cool and am excited to see what more it can do

[Anonymous No.6645885]

sad bnuuy -
Michelangelo, 2050

[Anonymous No.6645887]

>>6645831

Who are you competing against? I know you're too retarded to read my whole post but actual art sites do not want you

>>6645840

You're using dumb coomers on /g/ as porn board for reference that AI art "is one of the most popular technological advancements on the new decade"?

>>6645853

Artstation was literally spammed with anti-AI images for several days. I go on there and AI art is still met with constant criticism and always will be because real artists see it as lazy and worthless.

You can no longer make money from pixiv with AI art and people hate the fact that AI images get spammed on there.

Twitter has constant hate threads against AI art and if you post AI art the only people who will like your posts are other AI "artists".

Big companies are not replacing artists. I have not seen a single company do this. Some may be incorporating AI into their workflow but they know if they replace their artists they will get shit on so hard and their product will also suffer due to the mediocrity of AI art.
Like I said, more dead than NFTs

[Anonymous No.6645890]

>>6645853
>Artstation wants AI artists
Art Station wants traffic. Allowing roaches like yourself is a great way to accomplish their goal

>>6645868
>Get over it
That will never happen. Ai roaches will be harassed for eternity.

[Anonymous No.6645891]

>>6645845
Cause ot cam be generated at an unlimited pace, with unlimited quality, beating your shitty drawings.
Time to dig ditches, faggot

[Anonymous No.6645892]

>>6645887
I was going to read your post, but I then I saw all the reddit spacing and decided not too.

[Anonymous No.6645893]

>>6645878
>No one cares what a random sperg rejects
I speak for the whole human art community
>And it isn't alien
It was a though experiment, you failed the experiment.
>it's human
what did retard mean by this?

[Anonymous No.6645894]

>>6645887
>actual art sites do not want you

Then they will fade into obscurity compared to sites featuring superior AI art.

[Anonymous No.6645897]

>>6645878
>it's human
What redditors unironically believe

[Anonymous No.6645898]

>>6645887
>Big companies are not replacing artists. I have not seen a single company do this. Some may be incorporating AI into their workflow but they know if they replace their artists they will get shit on so hard and their product will also suffer due to the mediocrity of AI art.
AI cucks don't realize that in the industry even if AI would be used as a tool, you still need an artist who knows how to make a beautiful picture. it's not like random fucking retards will replace programmers for the very same reason.

[Anonymous No.6645900]

>>6645897
Redditors are going the way of the Dodo lmao.
Actual luddites throwing a helpless tantrum against machines

[Anonymous No.6645901]

>>6645891
>with unlimited quality
what the fuck does this even mean? you sound like you're trying to sell your shitty product here, Rajesh

[Anonymous No.6645902]

>>6645894
ahahahah

[Anonymous No.6645904]

>>6645887
>Artstation was literally spammed with anti-AI images for several days. I go on there and AI art is still met with constant criticism and always will be because real artists see it as lazy and worthless.
And the owners laughed and told them to shut the hell up because they are autists.

>You can no longer make money from pixiv with AI art and people hate the fact that AI images get spammed on there.
Yes you can and no one cares about what autists think. Pixiv especially, they already told them to stop crying.

>Twitter has constant hate threads against AI art
"Troons and shitty artists cry, professionals fear their replacement" in other words water is wet.

>and if you post AI art the only people who will like your posts are other AI "artists".
An ever increasing number of people. AI art interest has been quickly catching up to "traditional" digital art.

>Big companies are not replacing artists. I have not seen a single company do this. Some may be incorporating AI into their workflow but they know if they replace their artists they will get shit on so hard and their product will also suffer due to the mediocrity of AI art.
Whatever helps you sleep at night mate. I'm positive corporations will favor loose ends over profit.

[Anonymous No.6645905]

>>6644476
lmao you again.
it was shit then, it's still shit now. lazy faggot

[Anonymous No.6645906]

>>6645901
You cannot make anything remotely competitive against what current AI spits out within 5 seconds. Even if you took days and weeks to try.

[Anonymous No.6645907]

>>6645900
luddites were based, but you don't know what a luddite is anyway so this conversation would be pointless

[Anonymous No.6645908]

>>6645901
perfect skin perfct hair perfect boobies perfect vagina perfect hands perfect eyes perfect feet
perfection at 8k

[Anonymous No.6645909]

>>6645864
>ai "artists" have to rely on spamming the internet on masse and organize on their discord servers with bad faith arguments, insults, projections and strawmen to even have their existence acknowledged
>"if you kill your enemy that is disrupting public discourse and art out of clear ill-intention and attention, you lose"
Book burnings will happen again but this time it's going to be people.

[Anonymous No.6645910]

emo wolves
- Raphael, 2864

[Anonymous No.6645911]

>>6645898
Most of the millions of AI artists make beautiful pictures. What the hell is this post?

[Anonymous No.6645912]

>>6645906
I'm envious towards the artist you stole from, not your McSlop :)

[Anonymous No.6645914]

>>6645906
>You cannot make anything remotely competitive against what current AI spits out

I can draw a skateboard. I can draw scissors.

[Anonymous No.6645916]

>>6645911
>>6645902

[Anonymous No.6645919]

>>6645916
https://civitai.com/

[Anonymous No.6645920]

>>6645919
a perfect deluge of shit that all looks the same. I like how you thought you were proving a point. nothing, absolutely nothing can save your shit tastes. it's like looking at brutalist commie blocks for 5 hours, and thinking they're beautiful

[Anonymous No.6645922]

>>6645919
and they say ai artists are not artists...

[Anonymous No.6645923]

>>6645904

Can you tell me what your goal with AI art actually is? You seem very desperate for prompters to take over artists even though the past year has shown that nobody wants you.

Are you actually one of these people hoping to get hired as a prompter? Word of advice: look elsewhere. Art is cheap and AI art is worthless. You're better off taking a course on machine learning in another field

[Anonymous No.6645924]

>>6645920
Art that is far better than any feed on any other art site. Cope, seethe, and dilate.

[Anonymous No.6645928]

>>6645924
it's worse than ArtStation before AI

[Anonymous No.6645929]

>>6645923
>You seem very desperate for
Stop projecting. Calm down and check yourself before asking stupid questions. You already know the answer to why and artist makes art.

[Anonymous No.6645933]

hot topic fox -
Salvador Dali, 2000

[Anonymous No.6645934]

>>6645645
That image looks okay, but the perspective is so, so fucking wrong.

[Anonymous No.6645935]

>>6645928
Artstation improved thanks to AI that's why you're so triggered even 6 months later.

[Anonymous No.6645937]

>>6645935
>site for skilled professionals dumbed down into a dumpster for worthless Ai ejaculations

[Anonymous No.6645939]

>>6645600
>>6645603
>anon does in 5 minutes and from imagination what ai """bros""" need a whole pc and already existing artwork to even attempt
mega based

[Anonymous No.6645940]

>>6645937
AI prompters are more skilled than you will ever be and their art is great. COPE.

[Anonymous No.6645941]

>>6645603
>>6645939
>anon creates something infinitely worse than prompters who have access to the internet
mega sad

[Anonymous No.6645942]

>>6645940
You need to work on your trolling skills mr (you) fisherman, you're making it too obvious

[Anonymous No.6645943]

>"AI ARTISTS R BETTER THAN U COPE SEETHE UR MAD"

Even their posts are prompted, repetitive and soulless
lmao

[Anonymous No.6645945]

blue blur
- Rembrandt, 2014

[Anonymous No.6645946]

>>6645603
incredible how a single actually hand drawn piece has managed to send ai shills into a furious meltdown

[Anonymous No.6645949]

>>6645943
You are literally seething

[Anonymous No.6645950]

>>6645942
I'm not trolling. I am just making you face reality. AI has made me a better artist than every artist before me, and I'm only going to improve from here, this is the worst I'll ever be.

[Anonymous No.6645951]

>>6645600
>>6645603
>You transartists need every bit of tech to mimic a fraction of my autistic power.
kek

[Anonymous No.6645953]

>>6645929

I mean, you made the bold claim that professional artists will get replaced by AI, retard. Speak to me again in a year when you're still spamming this board with naked anime ladies and artists still have their jobs

[Anonymous No.6645954]

>"YOU ARE SEETHING"

[Anonymous No.6645956]

>>6645939
>need a whole pc
he says posting from his pc/phone
curious

[Anonymous No.6645957]

>>6645943
says the guy posting a basedjack

[Anonymous No.6645958]

>>6645949
Lmao, you can definitely tell, especially if he's breaking out the wojacks.

[Anonymous No.6645959]

>>6645953
>back peddled
It isn't a bold claim though. AI will replace people's jobs, you are completely delusional and haven't been paying attention if you believe otherwise.

[Anonymous No.6645962]

>>6645953
just give me 2 more weeks

[Anonymous No.6645963]

This is one embarrassing thread.

[Anonymous No.6645964]

>>6645957
>>6645958
>WOJAK BAD
But it's literally (you).

[Anonymous No.6645965]

>>6645959
>AI will replace people's jobs
It will. writers/programmers mostly.

[Anonymous No.6645966]

Love
- Jesus, 1945

[Anonymous No.6645968]

>>6645965
Artists too.

[Anonymous No.6645969]

>>6645603
>3 hours later this post is still making ai pajeets seethe

[Anonymous No.6645970]

>>6645968
after writers/programmers, and after the majority of humans live in pods and eats ze bugs

[Anonymous No.6645974]

>>6645970
It's been happening for months already just like writers.

[Anonymous No.6645976]

>>6645950
Taking credit for Ai's work isn't very nice anon. Show some respect for your robot overlords.

[Anonymous No.6645977]

Ai artists taking credit for AI's work is like a car driver claiming he can run fast because he drives a car.

[Anonymous No.6645985]

>>6645974
I've seen a couple of instances of it, those artists are still working though. just not at the mobile company that cut staff(including programmers)

[Anonymous No.6645988]

>>6645977
rickshaw drivers in shambles

[Anonymous No.6645998]

This is such an abstract chimp out.
Art lovers hating art because random reasons.

[Anonymous No.6646017]

>>6645998
>random reasons.

[Anonymous No.6646020]

>>6645998
AI "art" is not art just like trans rights are not human rights, troon.

[Anonymous No.6646023]

>>6645603
based
look at all the pa/g/eets trying to raid /ic/, again

[Anonymous No.6646048]

>>6645591
>harass artists
>shit up websites to the point they are unusable
>steal convention spot that could have gone to an actual artist
>caused a magazine to suspend submissions because they are swamped with AI spam
>img2img plagiarism
Fuck off and kill yourself

[Anonymous No.6646052]

>>6646048
In reality:
>make and post art
and then you go ballistic like you are right now

[Anonymous No.6646056]

>>6646052
>in reality
point out what part of his post is not real.

[Anonymous No.6646059]

>>6645801
>it's not like it mashes together a bunch of stored pictures lol
That's exactly what it does, el oh el.
https://towardsdatascience.com/understanding-latent-space-in-machine-learning-de5a7c687d8d
It's amazing how you faggots anthropomorphize and pretend that these machine learning models are magical and somehow actually learning and interpreting rather than crunching numbers in a completely predictable manner. These things were designed by human hands, they are not mysterious magical ancient artifacts from an advanced civilization. You're either lying to make image generators look better than they are, or you're actually pathetic enough to be getting high off your own supply.
Literally all that these things do is Encode image to latent space + associate with words -> use input words to search for points on the latent space and decode an image from it. The latent space contains nothing more and nothing less than the images that the ML model was trained on, and all the space between the points in the latent space corresponding to the originally trained-upon images are interpolations between them. Essentially, n-dimensional animorphs. This is the paradigm that all ML imagegen models are built upon. The only true breakthrough for Stable Diffusion was figuring out a method of doing so that was extremely efficient, since they performed the encoding (via the diffusion method) upon a latent representation (i.e. a highly compressed representation of the original data). So yes, those signatures are not because the machine "thinks" it should be there, but because it is a garbled interpolation of a (or many) signatures.

By the way, would anyone happen to have that one image of sad keanu reeves on a bench in a suit of armor generated by Midjourney? That one really makes the AI niggers seethe.

[Anonymous No.6646062]

>>6644415
Getting banned from that subreddit is probably god's way of blessing you

[Anonymous No.6646066]

>>6645467
>it does get fun to goad such people.
You just admitted that you do this to be an annoying faggot.

[Anonymous No.6646067]

Cool art, too bad you didn't draw it

[Anonymous No.6646072]

>>6646059
>sad keanu reeves

[Anonymous No.6646074]

>>6646059
>By the way, would anyone happen to have that one image of sad keanu reeves on a bench in a suit of armor generated by Midjourney? That one really makes the AI niggers seethe.
Explain.

[Anonymous No.6646078]

>>6646066
no he didn't

[Anonymous No.6646088]

>>6646059
what mental illness is this

[Anonymous No.6646100]

>>6646059
No one said it's magic other than you right now. And what you just described (well, half-described, if that) proves that the AI is generalizing data and recreating concepts based on these generalizations. Of course it uses data to MAKE those generalizations. You seem to mistake that for actually using them in the output. But I guess you're too bent on proving a point to even understand what the little actual information you provide amidst the insults and attacks even means.

[Anonymous No.6646103]

>>6646078
lol, can't even pretend not to be a samefag correctly.

[Anonymous No.6646105]

>>6646052
>in reality
give up AI tranny, you didnt draw, you are here just to start your petty flamewar over the fact that you are a con artist.
And thats the only type of artist you are.

[Anonymous No.6646118]

>>6646100
You, you're doing that thing again. That one where you use human terms to describe a mathematical operation. Your tendencies of cargo cultism and anthropomorphization of algorithms is altogether disturbing, and indicates that you need help of a professional sort. Perhaps even medication. Immediately.

[Anonymous No.6646119]

did this thread really reach over 300 replies? don’t you folks have hobbies?

[Anonymous No.6646122]

>>6646103
he clearly said you were the annoying faggot and it's fun to goad you

[Anonymous No.6646124]

>>6646105
You don't have to draw to make art anymore. How much coping will it take for you to understand that?

[Anonymous No.6646126]

>>6646074
>>6646072
You know, sad keanu?
... holy shit this is 13 years old. I guess I should stop being surprised when teens on the internet don't know memes.

[Anonymous No.6646130]

>>6646124
shitty bait, here's your last pitiful (you) on a dying thread

[Anonymous No.6646132]

>>6646130
It's a fact you autist.

[Anonymous No.6646133]

Sad Keang Reevthur Bleeding On A Battlefield rides again

[Anonymous No.6646144]

>>6646133
looks nothing alike

[Anonymous No.6646149]

>>6646144
:)

[Anonymous No.6646156]

>>6646100
>No one said it's magic
Many things are not said but the intent is clear from analyzing the text. Unfortunately too many people today believe in "humans becoming gods" or "humans being meat machines". The belief in the inherent and incomparable value of life is dwindling. Too many don't care about the person on the other side of the planet that has to do hard work 12 hours daily for 7 days a week just to survive. Too many don't care about the billions of cows, pigs and chicken being abused and slaughtered each year. Some people seem to care more about "AI rights" and "colonizing space" and "attaining immortality". It's a rather sad display of humanity.

[Anonymous No.6646161]

>>6646144

[Anonymous No.6646165]

>>6646161
>>6646149
mental illness

[Anonymous No.6646168]

>>6646124
I'm pretty sure their many ways people made art that didn't include drawing but not like you spastic retards to think on stuff unless it practically spoon feed to y'all

[Anonymous No.6646176]

>>6646122
Try reading the post, ESL dipshit.

[Anonymous No.6646179]

>>6646124
Pushing a slot machine button and hoping for the best doesn't make you an artist just like cutting off your dick doesn't make you a woman.

>>6646126
No, I mean, why does it make them mad?

[Anonymous No.6646180]

>>6646165
:))

[Anonymous No.6646182]

>>6646119
Making /ic/ mad is my hobby.

[Anonymous No.6646188]

>>6646182
pretending to be mad on /ic/ is mine

[Anonymous No.6646190]

>>6646179
Making art makes you an artist. The means do not matter.

[Anonymous No.6646191]

>>6646179
See >>6646165 >>6646144
FAIggots will tie themselves in knots trying to deny that MidJourney did not in fact pull up Keanu Reeves and photobash armor onto him (metaphorically speaking), and that image generators REALLY SQUEALY don't copy images THEY ACTUALLY LEARN LIKE A REAL ARTIST AAAAAAH
Honestly, it's a reaction not unlike how trannies react to being asked what a woman is, kek

[Anonymous No.6646197]

>>6646191
it's quite literally nothing alike aside from him vaguely looking like keanu.
you have autism.

[Anonymous No.6646201]

>want to ignore ai spammers
>he keeps replying to himself anyway
All this talk about how AI is the future, but they're still trying to bother real people with this trash.

Is violence really the only solution here?

[Anonymous No.6646206]

>>6645794
Oh stop it, I don't prompt. Never have, hopefully never will. The point I'm making is that consistent outrage on these boards and at random people using AI is doing jack shit. You're the lolcow. THEY ARE LITERALLY LAUGHING AT YOU. You know how you make that stop? Stop replying to AI posts and threads about AI. Keep up the outrage and soon everyone is just going to see us a internet karens ruining their fun. Most people never cared about art before AI, and people don't care now. All your raging is just going to make normies hate us more. I understand you're mad, I was there too at one point until I realized it wasn't worth it. I'm not saying don't stand your ground, but know when to pick your battles. You probably wont read this, but if you do, thank you.

[Anonymous No.6646208]

>>6646206
>concern trolling
>astroturfing
You ain't slick

[Anonymous No.6646210]

>>6646206
>"ur mad ur mad ooooh ur so mad"
Fine, i am mad now.
Ready yourself to accept the consequences.

[Debater No.6646214]

>>6646206
Neat but why do come here to sperg about and complain when get upset. DESU I say I encourage to people to be retarded if they want to post retarded or racist stuff outside of here that's their problem. Many here would rather stay anonymous or have degree of separation from here but y'all AI niggas and spammers want show y'all gaping assholes to world and if people retaliate back so be it. It's fault if it's gets directed at you or them

[Anonymous No.6646227]

>>6646197
>quite literally nothing alike
go on...
>aside from
oh ok, aside from...
>vaguely
more than vaguely, admit it.
here's more. notice the negative space under his arm, and the park bench poking out? see that square shape on the AI image in the gap under his arm? too many coincidences at once. you could be fooled into thinking it's img2img, but not, it's midjourney with over-training due to the popularity of the meme, like afghan girl)
I rest my case.

[Anonymous No.6646228]

>>6646227
genuine schizophrenia

[Anonymous No.6646230]

>>6646228
You don't believe that. You are just coping now.

[Anonymous No.6646232]

>>6646206
Chris-chan has a more convincing disguise than you do.

[Anonymous No.6646327]

>>>/g/
Can jannies do their fucking job and rangeban the faggots spamming this trash already

[Anonymous No.6646335]

Do you think the roaches who come here to pollute this board are the same who keep spamming the "artfag seethe" shit on /g/?

[Anonymous No.6646354]

>>6645008
it's always coomers clapping to this AIshit huh

[Anonymous No.6646358]

>>6645801
>That's why it's ridiculous to claim it copies anything
the "art" LITERALLY only exists because of real art made by real artists. if that's not copying/stealing I don't know what it is my dude

[Anonymous No.6646363]

>>6646358
that goes for any art except the first artist, we all copied him

[Anonymous No.6646372]

>>6646214
Don't respond to me with that nigger speak.

[Anonymous No.6646374]

>>6646208
>>6646210
>>6646232
Alright guys, you got me. all the AI troll posts are me. I guess I'll go kill myself now.

[Debater No.6646375]

>>6646372
honestly it my speech is what you deserve if you keep coming here why do you respond back nigga

[Anonymous No.6646377]

i dont know what i hate more, the artfaggots crying nonstop for the ai boogeyman or the aifaggots constantly trying to fit in and cash in with their lazy shit

its just a fucking tech novelty stop going crazy about it, what kind of fucking schizo psyop is this

[Debater No.6646386]

>>6646377
I could say the same for your bitch posting since all the you want to do is that but you apparently expect to hear something different

[Anonymous No.6646442]

>>6646363
You know theres an obvious difference between the two you disingenuous nigger

[Anonymous No.6646554]

>>6646442
The only real art is from someone that spends his entire life in a black room, drawing only from his own imagination and having never seen the real world or other peoples art

[Anonymous No.6646584]

Art is just re-arranging stuff people already did. AI makes it faster.

[Anonymous No.6646618]

>>6644161
>uh crop some clonky ai renderings
>uh its new meme shit with waifus
fucking gay

[Anonymous No.6646683]

>>6644161
this would have been funny if it was in mspaint hell getting a imagen gen to to use beginner mspaint style would still work.

[Anonymous No.6647025]

>>6644476
every fucking ai picture has this blur/interpolation on it and its always the first thing i notice. annoys the shit out of me

[Anonymous No.6647053]

>>6647025
I wonder if there's a way to solve the blur menace. Some AI art doesn't have it but it's kinda rare.

[Anonymous No.6647679]

>>6644476
???????????????
the pic on the left is literally infinitely better than whatever is on the right.

[Anonymous No.6647682]

>>6645360
>>6645367
>>6645371
>>6645371
>>6645376
>>6645378
>>6645431
>>6645467
>>6645495
>>6645543
>>6645638
>>6645697
>>6645922

the same hair highlights every time
fucking hell
learn to draw you worthless bland faggots.

[Anonymous No.6647762]

>>6644476
im so glad that AI is mostly replacing tranime art. nothing of value is lost

[Anonymous No.6647795]

>>6647762
Won't change the fact nobody will ever give a shit about your art.

[Anonymous No.6648040]

>>6647682
>the same hair highlights every time
Your point...?