/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

[Anonymous No.6637841]

Sirs... It's overed.

[Anonymous No.6637862]

>>6637841
bump
Fill me in on this. What do they mean by "advance notice of revision"?

Also post link, faggot

[Anonymous No.6637919]

>>6637841
Explain in English

[Anonymous No.6637924]

>Japanese announcement
I speak Japanese and I'm telling you it's a waste of time to read all of it, please find the two lines in the Bible they will write where they slightly hint at the new guidelines.

[Anonymous No.6637984]

>>6637841
it's about AI flooding the site? most people knows it's a bunch of ccp slaves posting ai shit mixed with cp to damage the site

[Anonymous No.6637992]

>>6637862
>>6637919
>https://www.pixiv.net/info.php?id=9522
Seems to me that if you say you're using an artist specific model (or it's too obvious) they'll ban you.
Seems based but they aren't going far enough.

[Anonymous No.6637993]

Ban art? No thanks ! Go back to China or Russia if you are into this kind of stuff.

[Anonymous No.6637999]

>>6637841
It's fine, they'll prohibit ai fugas to use fanbox. A few days ago there was some drama when some Ai retard posted how much he was making on fanbox using certain artist style. The original artist found out, tweeted about it and a horde of other jp artist followed.

Guy literally killed free AI cash farming for everybody kek

[Anonymous No.6638000]

>>6637993
You're not even trying anymore huh

[Anonymous No.6638002]

>>6637992
Just ban all fucking AI shit already. Nobody wants it on there anyways.

[Anonymous No.6638004]

>>6637999
>some Ai retard posted how much he was making on fanbox using certain artist style
how much was he making

[Anonymous No.6638005]

>>6637999
The more AI troons clown themselves the merrier.

[Anonymous No.6638006]

This is what originated it. People can be retarded sometimes, they literally had a gold mine and had to throw it away. Good, fuck them

[Anonymous No.6638013]

>>6637999
>>6638006
>hate ai
>become successful with ai and use position to be as annoying as possible
>ai removed

[Anonymous No.6638016]

>>6637992
DLsite had the same TOS, thought it was very based. Westoids(jewoids) literally don't give a shit about copyright.

[Anonymous No.6638017]

>>6638006
Honestly it’s not even sustainable it’s the same shit as nftbros. People arbitrarily pad the numbers to make it seem like the next big thing before everyone realizes it’s going nowhere and backs off.

It’s literally fake shilling. Just like how 99% of NFTs didn’t even make a dollar

[Anonymous No.6638036]

>>6638017
Remember how half the profit people were making off NFTs was just the Creator of said NFT buying them themselves to make it look like there was a financial interest in it?
The internet has made people bigger grifters then before

[Anonymous No.6638048]

There is zero positive argument for shitters trained directly on an existing artist's style. The only reason they exist is to either harass the target artist, or to otherwise try undermine their value as a creator.

[Anonymous No.6638089]

>>6637984
I didn't know about this. Are you sure it isn't glowies? I can see that being an angle to take down tech companies.

[Anonymous No.6638097]

>>6637992
Why the fuck not ban it altogether and threaten legal action against ToS breach? Newgrounds is still the most based art site in this shitshow.

[Anonymous No.6638101]

>>6638089
tech companies and big corpos are the ones most interested in AI, that's why they're pushing that shit so much, even using stupid /pol/tard rethoric to get idiots to support them
The ccp, as all the chink regime is obviously looking to take down anything japanese, so the easiest way to do that is by flooding the site with cheeze pizza shit

[Anonymous No.6638102]

>>6638036
Its just obvious in this case because not even the actual artists make that much money, and that's with them selling tutorials and other perks as marketing.

AIfags have nothing to offer people who'd buy into a patreon.

[Anonymous No.6638105]

>>6638097
If only newgronds wasn't complete dogshit as a website...

[Anonymous No.6638108]

>>6637999
Imagine once the FTC acts on this. They already recognized the sheer scam potential of algorithm tech from day 1 and have been basically signaling threats on their blog posts. I don't know how the government operates in Japan but action in the US tends to enable a domino effect.

[Anonymous No.6638110]

>first step into copyrighting styles
Bros...

[Anonymous No.6638115]

>>6638101
>so the easiest way to do that is by flooding the site with cheeze pizza shit
I mean it's evil but smart. Would be funny if it ever leads to a whole site takedown, I'd certainly like to see it happen with artstation.

[Anonymous No.6638120]

>>6638105
It's really not, the ui is just outdated. And that's part of the reason zoomers are attracted to it. That and oldskool humor isn't shunned like it is everywhere else.

[Anonymous No.6638124]

>>6638006
Yep. All the AI shit is what made Fanbox pull the plug on AI shitters who spammed the site.

[Anonymous No.6638134]

>>6638115
CCP chinks & western poos are to blame for pixiv's downfall.

[Anonymous No.6638133]

>>6638120
The ui isn't just a little outdated its absolutely horrible and fails to function as a decent art gallery, its somehow worse than twitter.

[Anonymous No.6638137]

>>6638134
Pixiv has fucked itself repeatedly for years.
Letting AI in at all solidified its downfall.

[Anonymous No.6638139]

>>6638133
At least it HAS a gallery. Twitter doesn't catalog shit.

[Anonymous No.6638140]

>>6638137
>It's over for the hundredth time
>This time is different!
Two more weeks, right inkcels?

[Anonymous No.6638143]

>>6638140
ok aicel

[Anonymous No.6638147]

>>6637841

[Anonymous No.6638150]

>>6638140
Shut up, pAIjeet. You're the reason why they are enforcing censorship in the first place. Had you simply follow the guidelines of the site this shit wouldn't have happened. Fucking curry munchers need to be deported back to the ganges.

[Anonymous No.6638156]

>>6637992
I wonder if I will get banned for my kamepan and massakasma gens. Not that it matter I just liked having a place to post.

[Anonymous No.6638157]

>>6638006
I called it months ago they were going to hit the wall with imposter syndrome. They want all the fame and money with no work or skill to show for it, so their next step in desperation is to harass genuine hardworking people.

[Anonymous No.6638158]

>>6638140
dumb cuck, you retards have turned the internet into a shitpile and because of you, we'll need IDs to even browse it in the first place. you deserve to have your heads lobbed off your shoulders, to not even mention that it's because of those "inkcels" you get to generate your filth in the first place.

[Anonymous No.6638159]

>>6638097
Newgrounds is cucked just like DA.

[Anonymous No.6638162]

>>6637992
This is one step closer to banning AI spam, which I welcome.

[Anonymous No.6638181]

>>6638159
One banned goyslop while the other made an in-house model and almost forced everyone to participate.

[Anonymous No.6638246]

>>6638108
I just hope they don't do something stupid like try to copyright "style" cause that opens a whole nother can of issues if someone like disney or nintendo can start suing people for drawing characters too close to canon styles.

[Anonymous No.6638251]

>>6638181
Here's the deal: If I'm not allowed to be edgy, draw tits, draw pussy, draw ass, draw NSFW, & draw attractive females, then your site is shit & not worth my time. IDGAF if I am labelled racists, homophobic, etc. My cooming & banter powers overpower the PC culture that exist in those sites.

[Anonymous No.6638260]

>>6638246
And we'd have AIniggers to "thank" for it

[Anonymous No.6638261]

Just specify that your platform is for drawn art and not synthesized or generated artwork. It's not that fucking hard.

[Anonymous No.6638272]

>>6638101
why the fuck would I want curryniggers and apefricans to have access to anything at all ever?
fuck emad what a dumb faggot
TAID

[Anonymous No.6638289]

>>6638272
>to have access to anything
slave workforce that'll work for pennies a day
That's how chinkland and pedocuba survived beign commie shitholes, communism turns countries into slave factories

[Anonymous No.6638296]

>it's not about restricting lolicon again
Good. I can sleep.

[Anonymous No.6638297]

>>6638101
>retard thinks we're hoarding up knowledge
Yes, that's why there are free drawing tutorials on youtube

[Anonymous No.6638301]

>>6638156
post more

[Anonymous No.6638303]

>>6638301
anon, this is an art board I'm not gonna fill it with my ai images

[Anonymous No.6638306]

>>6638303
post an account where you post them then, i just want to see

[Anonymous No.6638315]

>>6638246
Styles are technically already copyrighted. It depends on how much legal muscle you're able to hire.

[Anonymous No.6638325]

>>6638306
Most of my massakasama stuff uses a few more artist loras to mess with the style because massakasma already knew about my model and lora of his work, I already removed them form civitai at his request, so I didn't want to poke a hornets nest. As far as my kamepan stuff goes it looks boring. My gens are shit, do you still want to see my pixiv?

[Anonymous No.6638334]

>>6638325
sure

[Anonymous No.6638341]

>>6638334
fuck it here:
https://www.pixiv.net/en/users/88479747

[Anonymous No.6638370]

>>6638097
>Newgrounds is still the most based art site in this shitshow.

Fur Affinity and e621 banned AI goyslop too.
Turns out furries are based.

It's funny how even Redditors hate AI art.

[Anonymous No.6638381]

>>6638004
1/36 of what low tier ai whores make at onlyfans

[Anonymous No.6638383]

>>6637841
Basically Pixiv is btfoing people saying AI can't create new styles lol.

[Anonymous No.6638386]

>>6638315
They aren't even remotely copyrightable.

[Anonymous No.6638387]

>>6638156
keep that garbage to yourself. stop spamming art sites with slop

[Anonymous No.6638389]

>>6638297
>Yes, that's why there are free drawing tutorials on youtube
And even with all of those tutorials and years of practice most people are shit artists. But if you use AI you can make great art after a couple of days or less. See the discrepancy here?

[Anonymous No.6638407]

>>6638389
>See the discrepancy here?
That you're a dumb faggot and no one should ever take you seriously?

[Anonymous No.6638412]

>>6638407
He's talking about the shitty or bitter artists trying to delete AI art. AI being the thing that lets you create good art like a good artist with knowledge.

[Anonymous No.6638417]

>>6638006
LMAO dude is earning 10 times more than any of you can ever dream of earning AND he spends like 100 times less time on it, what a fucking chad

[Anonymous No.6638423]

>>6638017
You don't make any sense. It's an emerging art form that will improve dramatically. At the current pace in a couple of years people will be able to make entire movies and video games by themselves with AI. It will lower the value of these things but you seem to be implying something else entirely.

[Anonymous No.6638425]

>>6638006
what is the point of giving money to this guy? feeding a leech instead of feeding someone who will grow from your contribution?

[Anonymous No.6638427]

>>6638425
Both produce something you want more of, what's the difference really?

[Anonymous No.6638428]

>>6637841
they're not actually doing anything because management would be dumb to cut off a source of revenue

[Anonymous No.6638430]

>>6638428
They'll stop people plagiarizing IE impersonating artists. Or perhaps if they're just outright ripping them off to a high degree. Not much will change though since not many, if any, people are doing that.

[Anonymous No.6638435]

>>6638427
One gets better because you support them, the other stagnates until big corp drop an update. Plus you know, empathy.

[Anonymous No.6638438]

>>6638435
Both of them get better and you can empathize with either person just fine, they're both just people making stuff for you. One is more talented and works slower, the other works REALLY fast. The quality of their outputs is subjective too but I've seen plenty of examples of AI "impersonating" art being better than the source which is another reason people might prefer to pay the AI artist. Obviously a lot of people prefer to pay the real artist.

[Anonymous No.6638439]

>>6638427
I want the actual thing, not the shitty Temu knockoff.

[Anonymous No.6638440]

>>6638439
Others just want the thing they like. Some want both.

[Anonymous No.6638441]

>>6638438
>One is more talented and works slower, the other works REALLY fast.
One works, the other does no work. Give him money because he bought a gpu and you didn't is retarded beyond belief.

[Anonymous No.6638442]

>>6638417
too bad it's over

[Anonymous No.6638443]

>>6638370
>It's funny how even Redditors hate AI art.
Until THEY are the ones trying to scam people out of their money, like every aicel here

[Anonymous No.6638446]

>>6638441
They both work.
>Give him money because he bought a gpu and you didn't is retarded beyond belief.
If you ask me, giving ANYONE money for pictures is retarded beyond belief. I always scratch my head when people give me money.
And you're ignoring that some people use that GPU better than you, just like some people use pencils better than you.

[Anonymous No.6638449]

>>6638389
>AI you can make great art
100% of what ai makes is literal trash worse than the most beg of begs here, try again

[Anonymous No.6638450]

>>6638446
>If you ask me
No one did, bugman

[Anonymous No.6638451]

>>6638438
Imagine working for years on your skills, only for some AInigger to spend an afternoon tagging and throwing your works together to "make" a picture shitter, declare himself better than you, and then trying to steal away your patrons and future potential patrons, not to mention stalking your uploads for img2img fodder that he can "improve" and try to render your gallery "obsolete."
I'd gladly take on somebody like that in a game of Minecraft.

[Anonymous No.6638452]

>>6637841
You Can (Not) Redeem

[Anonymous No.6638453]

>>6638412
>trying to delete AI art
no one's doing that, aicels started it, they should have shut up a long time ago

[Anonymous No.6638454]

>>6638442
He can simply create a new account? Also god knows how many people like him are there

[Anonymous No.6638455]

>>6638449
Keep telling yourself that while crying yourself to sleep.

>>6638451
>seething grasping strawman argument

[Anonymous No.6638456]

>>6638449
If it's so bad it's worse than a beg, how come it gets so many likes on twitter and wherever? Don't tell me literally every AI post has botted likes or I'll laugh at you

[Anonymous No.6638457]

>>6638412
You're bad at false flags.

[Anonymous No.6638458]

>>6638438
>plenty of examples of AI "impersonating" art being better than the source
never happened

[Anonymous No.6638459]

>>6638453
What are you even taking about? That is literally what he was talking about.

[Anonymous No.6638461]

>>6638455
cope

[Anonymous No.6638463]

>>6638458
Happens 24/7. The best example of this is in human portraits, 3DPD style. No living woman can even remotely compete with the AI sluts with gigantic tits that people generate. It happens with pretty much every art style though.

[Anonymous No.6638465]

>>6638456
>likes are a measure of quality
Fuck off back to r*ddit

[Anonymous No.6638466]

>>6638465
AHAHAHAHa the seethe is strong with this one!

[Anonymous No.6638467]

>>6638455
>strawman argument
>I've seen plenty of examples of AI "impersonating" art being better than the source which is another reason people might prefer to pay the AI artist.

[Anonymous No.6638469]

>>6638467
Yes. Who do you think you are talking about? You're just making up a fictional story with made up characters.

[Anonymous No.6638471]

>>6638463
ai always makes shit, keep believing people has 7 fingers or 5 legs

[Anonymous No.6638474]

>>6638456
nazis, commies, feminazis and all kind of idiots get tens of thousands of likes for their stupid takes

[Anonymous No.6638475]

>>6638469
You dumb nigger, I was describing the situation alluded to in more detail as opposed to glossing over the logistics of it.

[Anonymous No.6638476]

>>6638465
Says the faggot white knighting a machine.

[Anonymous No.6638477]

>>6638471
Projection.

[Anonymous No.6638479]

>>6638455
>y-you are a strawman! you are totally crying while I'm the chadest and basedest of the chads!

[Anonymous No.6638481]

>>6638465
It's proof people like something...

[Anonymous No.6638482]

>>6638475
You are making a strawman argument to make yourself feel better. You're a schizo though so it came off as completely retarded.

[Anonymous No.6638483]

>>6638477
>Projection
ok aicel

[Anonymous No.6638484]

>>6638483
Prove me wrong posting your masterworks. You don't always make shit, right?

[Anonymous No.6638508]

No draw tourist fucks always wanting people to post their work.

[Anonymous No.6638510]

>>6638006
Found that tweet, and there's some quote tweets from nips saying it's that jcom is the artist himself falseflagging gathered from the wierd evidence of the jcom twitter and fanbox that made in April without any history and the evidence of the fanbox revenue being edited
https://twitter.com/demabuster/status/1653554379201585152

It might be wrong though, not to attack the artist but there used to be a trend on twitter involving artist making a throwaway twitter account to attack his real account by using AI, it used to done by img2img or whatever it's called on his own image and post it on the main account. After that the artist make a new post to fan the drama further.
This is done to genererate the traffic from drama resulting in more followers and more favored by algorithm

[Anonymous No.6638522]

>>6637992
Just shadowban all common easily accessible AI generated pictures (like novelAI's with their own Metadata for example), maybe program random bookmark/views/like counter for the shadowbanned posts to fool the jeets. At least cjts down on AI spammers who kept on posting multiple posts for variation of the same goddamned image.

[Anonymous No.6638536]

>>6638510
The Japanese wouldn't do that, right? Unlike westerners they h-have h-h-honor... right?

[Anonymous No.6638541]

Since the faggot jannies deleted this, I guess it's true... you can trust nobody anymore, not even your heroes

[Anonymous No.6638547]

>>6638102
It was exposed that the number was faked.
https://twitter.com/demabuster/status/1653554379201585152?t=OHfJ4QC1Tjquu8V3XgMT-w&s=19

[Anonymous No.6638577]

>>6638454
Not on Fanbox now lol
All of them are going gone by the end of this year

[Anonymous No.6638580]

>>6638577
2 more weeks

[Anonymous No.6638581]

>>6638580
Account already got banned lol

[Anonymous No.6638583]

>>6638006
why would anyone pay for that shit? it isnt even showing tits or vegana

[Anonymous No.6638585]

>>6638583
People are already saying it's fake
Just a ploy to make you buy their models so you can also be like them

Exactly like how scammers always give you pictures after pictures of the money that they claim to have made easily

[Anonymous No.6638586]

>>6638583
it's a nice picture

[Anonymous No.6638590]

>>6638389
well, you don't make anything with AI

[Anonymous No.6638592]

>>6638590
If AI chads weren't making art you wouldn't be so upset right now. Stop deluding yourself.

[Anonymous No.6638593]

>>6638592
If you are making it, then why don't you have copyright over it

[Anonymous No.6638595]

>>6638592
aicucks don't make any art, it's a fundamental misconception. the ai generate a picture for them

[Anonymous No.6638596]

>>6638593
Because boomers don't understand what Stable Diffusion is.

>>6638595
They do.

[Anonymous No.6638597]

>>6638596
Not your art, no copyright
Enjoy getting banned, prompter

[Anonymous No.6638598]

>>6638597
Enjoy staying mad for the rest of your life.

[Anonymous No.6638599]

>>6638598
I am celebrating right now lol

[Anonymous No.6638600]

>>6638599
But nothing has changed. What you're doing is coping, a small respite from the past half year of seething.

[Anonymous No.6638601]

>>6638600
>already banned
>nothing has changed

[Anonymous No.6638602]

>>6638601
>one person who was a falseflagging artist got banned
Uhh..

[Anonymous No.6638603]

>>6638596
>They do
no but they sure like to pretend and larp as artists

[Anonymous No.6638604]

Remember when they flooded everyone calling artists obsolete?

Good times, good times

[Anonymous No.6638605]

>>6638602
>i-it's not real we would not get banned

[Anonymous No.6638606]

>>6638603
If you make art you are an artist.

[Anonymous No.6638607]

>>6638606
that's the funny thing, they don't make it

[Anonymous No.6638608]

>>6638607
Yes they do.

[Anonymous No.6638609]

>>6638608
No copyright is no future

[Anonymous No.6638610]

>>6638609
You're one of those tards huh. I guess every work pre-copyright wasn't art.

[Anonymous No.6638611]

>>6638609
breaking news: someone using a printer is now a calligraphist

[Anonymous No.6638612]

>>6638610
Whatever helps you sleep ;)
NO COPYRIGHT, BABY

[Anonymous No.6638613]

>>6638611
meant for >>6638608

[Anonymous No.6638614]

>>6638611
Printers only copy.

[Anonymous No.6638618]

>>6638610
nta but the ruling does explain why they are not elligible for copyright and by extension explain why they aren't artworks.

[Anonymous No.6638623]

>>6638618
It also misunderstands the process of creating art using AI. There's a reason this entire month they're discussing it with artists. I actually kinda agree that Midjourney works should be exempt because it's not the same kind of black box you can mix yourself, but as it stands their arguments do not apply to what people get up to with Stable Diffusion. It can get far more involved and complicated than drawing.

[Anonymous No.6638626]

>>6638623
Yaaaaaaawn

[Anonymous No.6638629]

>>6638006
>$1257.77

[Anonymous No.6638631]

>>6638629
Like for what? 2 seconds entering prompts, 10 minutes waiting for the pic to be done? Literally free money

[Anonymous No.6638632]

>>6638626
Don't forget to cry. It's not healthy bottling it all up.

[Anonymous No.6638634]

>>6638632
Crying with laughter right now lmao

You guys were soooooo haughty 6 months ago

[Anonymous No.6638637]

>>6638623
kekimus maximus

[Anonymous No.6638657]

It would continue to improve, they said
Artists are obsolete, they said
Everyone would use it, they said
You are all Luddites, they said

Today:
We would not be banned, they say

Meanwhile, every single thing I predicted is happening right before our eyes
It cannot be copyrighted
It is spam and would be deleted
You will all be banned

[Anonymous No.6638663]

>>6638657
you are genuinely a sad person

[Anonymous No.6638670]

>>6638663
Eat shit, baby

[Anonymous No.6638675]

>>6638670
deluding yourself and coping is unhealthy

[Anonymous No.6638677]

>>6638675
heh

[Anonymous No.6638687]

i never understand why you retards reply to pajeets
also lol @ the jeet calling someone a sad person when he's been furiously responding to every post in this thread

[Anonymous No.6638698]

Pixiv was dead when they tried to censored my porn. I'm in america. Fuck you chingchongs. Your laws do not "appry" to me.

[Anonymous No.6638701]

am i banned

[Anonymous No.6638704]

>>6638701
yes

[Anonymous No.6638728]

>>6638541
>leads to ai getting banned
based as fuck. I already loved ogipote but now i like him even more

[Anonymous No.6638735]

I just returned home from work and the shill is still at it?

[Anonymous No.6638761]

>>6638296
Sweet dreams loli bro

[Anonymous No.6638773]

>>6638698
>Pixiv was dead when they tried to censored my porn
They had to start enforcing it because credit card companies & Japanese government started complaining. A bunch pAIjeets & CCP chinks were uploading shady shit with the AI that were violating pixiv's TOS. Reminder the enforcing of censoring genitalia didn't start until AI shitters flood the site with shady shit.

[Anonymous No.6638779]

>>6638592
The art was never yours to begin with, pAIjeet

[Anonymous No.6638782]

>>6637841
Does pixiv support uncompressed full res uploads

[Anonymous No.6638832]

>>6637841
If the removed Ai art they wouldnt be in this mess. they deserve to die

[Anonymous No.6638846]

>>6638832
Ai trolls just need to just spam loras on their most popular tags, the amount of moderation needed will probably force a blanket ban or kill the site altogether lol

[Anonymous No.6638854]

>>6638832
>>6638846
It's the future of art. Deal with it.

[Anonymous No.6638875]

>>6638423
Yeah but it will just be another stupid thing people do on their phone apps to waste time. No one will care about the "artform" and it will be something that is taken for granted.

[Anonymous No.6638877]

>>6638854
There is no future of art. It's only mindless consooming from here on out.

[Anonymous No.6638892]

>>6637992
nice AI translation

[Anonymous No.6638893]

>>6638875
No one cares about any art form by your logic. It's just a stupid thing people do on their phones or paper.

>>6638877
So nothing changes.

[Anonymous No.6638898]

>>6638522
This is a bandaid and real artists will get in the crossfire.

[Anonymous No.6638900]

>>6638604
Within a month there will be many that easily get around this little problem. Spammers aren't representative of what can be done with these tools. You're funny.

[Anonymous No.6638901]

>>6638728
You can already almost produce this with what's available, soon you won't even need to edit. I see why people were shitting on /ic/.

[Anonymous No.6638906]

>>6638900
They will adapt within a day and off you go searching for another way

Follow the rules dumbass
We don't want it so leave

Go make your own website where it's nothing but AI art. But we all know that you don't want it either LMAO

[Anonymous No.6638920]

>>6638900
you're not wanted. AI shit will be appreciated only by tech obsessed NPCs who want to hype and consoom next product, so make your own community

[Anonymous No.6638924]

>>6638900
All spammers get the Range ban
Good luck

[Anonymous No.6638935]

Hey hey hey...hear me out...how..how about we use AI to detect AI generated art? Shouldn't thab e possible? Like a plugin that checks your uploaded picture for similarities to AI art. And if it's suspicious you have to proof with screenshots or a video that it's really real.

[Anonymous No.6638937]

>>6638935
That's been done for a while. The problem is that it's an arms race between a bunch of retards with money and fewer retards with less money.

[Anonymous No.6638942]

>>6638935
Already done
>https://huggingface.co/saltacc/anime-ai-detect
>https://hivemoderation.com/ai-generated-content-detection

[Anonymous No.6638979]

>>6638935
>>6638937
If humans can do it by thumbnails alone, surely machine learning can

[Anonymous No.6638981]

>>6638979
I mean look at pic related, at first glance I didn't knew it was AI

He added a lora of a electrical fan to his normal model

[Anonymous No.6638982]

>>6638981
lmao

[Anonymous No.6638988]

>>6638981
Looks more AI in thumbnail vs medium res, of course full res reveals everything kek

[Anonymous No.6638995]

>>6638156
>Not that it matter I just liked having a place to post.
You have Twitter.

[Anonymous No.6638998]

>>6638981
Only coomers use ai, oyoyoy, kek, lmao...
Stupid ass idiots.

[Anonymous No.6639004]

>>6638893
>So nothing changes.
for your consoomer coomer brain, certainly. i don't understand your broken subhuman species myself, how you can look at the same anime girls in the same poses and never get tired of it. there's more porn than you can consumer already in a lifetime, so it's incomprehensible to me. i have this feeling of pity, and the urge to put you out of your misery

[Anonymous No.6639008]

>>6638979
no, humans have soul, that's why they can tell, it takes soul to know soul, that's why aijeets think their ai shit passes. that's why!

I actually am hopeful AI gets this figured out soon, I made some actual passing AI stuff when testing it out(but not typical ai imagery)

[Anonymous No.6639010]

>>6638981
>Mutant fan
>Deranged navel placement
>Nonsense hair underglow/glowthrough
>Scene disconnected from reality; no creator input, vibe, tempo, or tidbits. No feeling for the setting in what should be an immersive picture
AI bros reek of more desperation than humanity

[Anonymous No.6639019]

>>6639008
Also AI shit is so incredibly personalized and generative that the only person who are impressed are the person who generated the work. People are more likely to fawn over the generator itself rather than the works generated. I worry we lose IP fanbases and communal engagements with media because of hyperpersonalized realities but that's a worst case dystopian scenario.

[Anonymous No.6639030]

>>6639010
The average normie would never care about these things and you know it.

[Anonymous No.6639031]

>>6639010
Yeah, like if this was an actual artist's work it would be completely nonsensical for the subject to cool her underside with a fan while her back is facing sunlight. Also why the fuck do it in front of a doorway leading outdoors? Why not a window? It's all fucking compromises

[Anonymous No.6639041]

>>6639030
>>6638370

[Anonymous No.6639092]

>>6639030
Beep boop- random words.
Ai brainlet gtfo.

[Anonymous No.6639094]

>>6639030
That's right, anon. Strive for mediocrity.

[Anonymous No.6639096]

>>6639030
... Are you proud of yourself? Did you ever thought about it? Can you?
You are on current neural network`s level of intellegence- non existent. All like`s of you should never even come close to anything artistic and you newer will.

[Anonymous No.6639097]

[Anonymous No.6639111]

>>6638981
I honestly figured it out at the thumbnail alone
I figured it out because it's so similar to every other AI art.

And by similar, I mean, it uses the same color contrast, bad shading, and worst of all, the uncanny combination of 3D, realistic texture, and 2D

Shit is a compete mishmash everytime, all the time

[Anonymous No.6639113]

>>6639030
You said that from the very start and look.
Those normies are sick and tired of it. Everyone's already demanding proper tag filters if not outright calling for its ban

And that's just for the first 4 months

[Anonymous No.6639123]

[Anonymous No.6639124]

>>6639041
>feels like you didn't make it
>it was premade
hmmmm

[Anonymous No.6639138]

>>6638998
I'm a coomer, I hate AI images too.

[Anonymous No.6639162]

>>6638900
Fuck off to civitai / sdg pajeetkun

[Anonymous No.6639244]

>>6637841

[Anonymous No.6639253]

Why the fuck would anyone pay for someone to make an AI picture? The entire point of AI is that the layman can make decent pictures with it without needing any skill. Literally why pay someone to generate an image for you when you can do it yourself without spending anything?

[Anonymous No.6639258]

>>6639253
This is why there is still a decent amount of for this shit, because they are literally subhumans

[Anonymous No.6639259]

>>6639258
Support*

[Anonymous No.6639344]

>>6639253
Same reason you pay someone to paint for you, takes too long to do it yourself. Now to learn how to paint to a high level maybe takes 10 years so you'll pay a lot of money for a high quality painting, but even the AI will probably take the average joe a week to figure out so why not just pay someone $5 and get it done immedietly?

[Anonymous No.6639349]

>>6639344
because it's not worth anything above 10 cents

[Anonymous No.6639369]

>>6639349
Your opinion is irrelevant, It's worth as much as someone is willing to pay.

[Anonymous No.6639378]

>>6639369
It's a matter of time until normies realize how worthless and easy AIshit is to make, and it'll get even easier. AI scammers have no future.

[Anonymous No.6639382]

>>6639378
At some point the AI will be so good you'll get exactly the image you want on the first few tries and everyones phone will have the capabilities, but who knows when that will be.

[Anonymous No.6639385]

>>6638608
You don't make art. The computer is making it for you. You don't know how to draw. You are pathetic. Learn to draw brown nigger

[Anonymous No.6639387]

>>6638663
You're a sad person who can't make any art and had to have it generated for you

[Anonymous No.6639389]

>>6638687
India needs to be fucking bombed and all Indians killed

[Anonymous No.6639390]

>>6639344
why buy ai art when you can learn how to do it in a week and make profit from it. if a skill ceiling is so low that it can be reached within a week then everyone and their mom is going to do it, once people find out how short time it takes to reach it compared to college degrees its going make everyone ai artists

[Anonymous No.6639395]

>>6638854
The future of art is people being lazy fucks and not learning how to do art? Sounds horrible curry nigger

[Anonymous No.6639401]

>>6639369
and that will decrease over time.

[Anonymous No.6639422]

Lads how hard will Pajeet seethe when he realizes there's Zero (0) money to be made from AI shit, that no company on earth will hire him for anything other than janitorial services and that he was better off reselling Bored Apes?

[Anonymous No.6639427]

I sincerely wish all indians a very happy nuclear holocaust.

[Anonymous No.6639490]

>>6639369
>Your opinion is irrelevant
>says the AI cuck
you have no skills
you have no toilet
you have no giftcards to redeem

[Anonymous No.6639513]

>>6639490
I'm not an AI cuck, just an ammoral capitalist.

[Anonymous No.6639516]

>>6639513
> just an ammoral capitalist.
That’s every single ai cuck, dumbfuck

[Anonymous No.6639537]

>>6639516
Not all rectangles are squares friend.

[Anonymous No.6639541]

>>6639513
I'm just as ammoral to do whatever it takes to get rid of the competition, which in this case is the aicucks

[Anonymous No.6639570]

>>6638854
Just like how microtransactions and live service is the future of gaming?

[Anonymous No.6639573]

>>6638900
Proompters are the trannies of the art world.

[Anonymous No.6639809]

>>6638979
>>6638935
Neither humans or AIs can tell. It's just a guessing game.

[Anonymous No.6639810]

>>6639570
No and you need to stop acting like a panicked goy. It's the future of art and it will make art completely free. And that's a good thing.

>>6639573
Most of the people against AI art are literally trannies.

[Anonymous No.6639824]

>>6639810
>Most of the people against AI art
Bruh, that's all artists worth their salt. gtfo with your bullshit.
>AI artist are real artists
lol, don't you get it?

[Anonymous No.6639830]

>>6639824
Most artists aren't against it though.

[Anonymous No.6639831]

>>6639830
they are

[Anonymous No.6639842]

>>6639809
I can tell

[Anonymous No.6639876]

>>6639830
Only sellout grifters aren't against it, which is a small minority.

[Anonymous No.6639880]

>>6639830
Get out of /sdg/ for once.

[Anonymous No.6639889]

>>6639876
Most artists are fine with it because it makes the creation of art more accessible and it produces great work. Anyone can use it, it's objectively a good thing and most welcome it.

[Anonymous No.6639893]

>>6639889
bad bait

[Anonymous No.6639897]

>>6638995
why would I want to use that

[Anonymous No.6639905]

>>6639889
false pajeet narrative

[Anonymous No.6639925]

>>6639893
>>6639905
It's only seething trannies and grifters who hate it because it threatens them.

[Anonymous No.6639927]

>>6639925
AI is precisely for use by disabled trannies.

[Anonymous No.6639940]

>>6639927
>i smashed my hand and fingers with a hammer
>it actually made sense but now it SEEMS irrational
>im mentally ill
>cheers
>40k followers
>averages 30-50 likes
>begs for money
>pls buy my merch
>basically and definitely some autstic edgy coomer codemonkey tranny with a botted account
And now realize that people like this are allowed to use social media, vote and are left on their own

God really makes the funniest jokes.

[Anonymous No.6639977]

>>6639889
Source: Your ass.

[Anonymous No.6640383]

>>6639925
>>6639889
>this fucking cope
hory shit

[Anonymous No.6641265]

>>6638981
>at first glance I didn't knew it was AI
shiiiet man i can usually tell from the thumbnail with like 95% accuracy i don't even know how

[Anonymous No.6641326]

>>6638854
>>6639810
>>6639830
>>6639889
>>6639925
samefag
ai is worse than the stupid bored monkeys and deserves a worse fate

[Anonymous No.6641341]

>>6638013
200iq take

[Anonymous No.6641353]

>>6638006
Imagine spending hours upon hours trying to perfect your artstyle only to have some AI shitter steal your artwork then make profit off of your artstyle. Yeah, I can't really blame the art faggots for being pissed about this.

[Anonymous No.6641358]

>>6638981
that fan looks like shit, it has no motor and it's crooked, damn it still doesn't know how to create coherence in the images ignorant pajeets.

[Anonymous No.6641359]

>>6638920
AI is already being is used in a lot of office jobs. I predict officewagie might end up being out of jobs because of AI within the end of the decade. We've seen what ChatGPT can do. It can replace writers, programmers, paper pushers, etc. I mean it does a lot of stuff. Art & music chads however will still be around.

[Anonymous No.6641360]

>>6639940
for a reverse trope, check this out
>guy stabbed his own hand to please "certain people"
https://www.patreon.com/jephjacques

[Anonymous No.6641361]

>>6638451
Artlets thinking people are img2img their art.
When in reality its training LORAS and finetune models on pretty much anything.
I'm sorry but the amount of artist/creatives seethe is just too much to not laugh at. The sad fact is you directly put yourself in competition with AI. You have no one to blame but yourselves.

Anyway I'm wayy beyond creating coomer art with AI which to me is only a novelty, I find it far better for conceptual/architectural art.
Not sure how pixiv is going to enforce "style protection", I do imagine the shenanigans from people bitching about stolen "styles" be it AI or not will be hilarious.

[Anonymous No.6641364]

>>6641353
If your style and idea is so easily replicated by an AI, to me that would be the point I would seriously consider reevaluating your art and maybe realizing it's not quite as unique as you think it is.
Getting pissed at someone making money over copying a style is like getting pissed at someone copying "cubism, anime, impressionism" if that was your medium.

[Anonymous No.6641374]

>>6641361
Why are AI nigger parasites like this so confrontational and aggressive?

[Anonymous No.6641375]

>>6638981
anon I can tell you probably gen'd that yourself via the file name. few people save other's gen's while keeping it's file name.

[Anonymous No.6641377]

>>6641374
Partly because even before AI /ic/ was in a state of self-defeat, pedantic, ngmi mental state. AI just pushed everyone into full on panic mode because it not just the job but the identity of being an artist that AI destroys.
I also legitimately think there are a small yet vocal minority of artists here and elsewhere that are mad their hard trained skills can now be outdone or met at parity by anyone with access to a modern graphics card.

[Anonymous No.6641448]

>>6641361
>>6641377
trying to rewrite history now, are we?

[Anonymous No.6641479]

>>6638892
le epic own xD
le false equivalency!!?

[Anonymous No.6641482]

>DUKAT: I know you find this to accept, but I believe that in some ways the Occupation actually helped Bajor.
>KIRA: Which part? The massacres or the strip mining?
>DUKAT: I have no desire to debate the merits of the Occupation with you. I'm even willing to admit that perhaps we were a little harsh in our methods. But the fact is, the Bajoran people are stronger now than they have been in centuries. When we arrived, you were a weak, contemplative race, choking on your isolation. And now you have a new confidence, a whole new sense of purpose, not to mention a key role in the future of this entire quadrant.
>KIRA: All of which Bajor achieved in spite of the Cardassians, not because of them.

[Anonymous No.6641498]

>>6641374
Because they can't get punched through a screen

[Anonymous No.6641505]

>>6641374
A mix of ones who think they're being le epik troll, and ones who think they've somehow won something because they feel like they've gone from being a person who's never made anything of value to a master artist who can "improve" any artist's style with the click of a button.

[Anonymous No.6641510]

>>6641505
The dumb kid who acts smug after acing a test because he copied the answers off another kid's paper.

[Anonymous No.6641520]

>>6641361
>>6641377
YWNBAA. and you will never be a part of the artist community.
>a small yet vocal minority of artists here and elsewhere
sure sounds like coping to me

[Anonymous No.6641661]

>>6638417
nigga, that’s like 1k

[Anonymous No.6641945]

>>6641520
>Consentual training
You do realize this is a courtesy to artists and is not any form a legal or contractual obligation. Nor is there any mechanism that would prevent me or literally anyone from training ML/AI on available data.

But please continue to seethe about how AI is "stealing" your work. It's as retarded as trying to prevent other artists from using your work as a reference or imitating your style.

[Anonymous No.6641958]

>>6641661
That’s a lot of money to pajeets, anon

[Anonymous No.6641961]

>>6641945
Just because this shit is to new to have a legal precedent it doesn't mean it's not stealing. Can't wait until the ai parasites get what they deserve

[Anonymous No.6641977]

/pol/ meme for every AI thread.

[Anonymous No.6641981]

>>6641945
>it learns like a human gaiz

[Anonymous No.6641992]

>>6641359
>It can replace writers
I hope not, the output is just as garbage.

[Anonymous No.6642019]

The reality is if you're a good artist there's nothing to worry about.

[Anonymous No.6642024]

>>6641945
>prevent other artists from using your work
Tell that to the guy who got fired from Wizards of the Coast and lost thousands of $$$ for "imitatingusingreferencelearning" lmao

[Anonymous No.6642026]

>>6641359
>programmers
This guy actually thinks an AI is going to do all the programming work for him lmao

[Anonymous No.6642038]

>>6642026
NTA but i can see big companies needing only a team of 5 programmers instead of 100 thanks to AI, i work for Amazon and the higherups are trying to implement AI in the process as much as possible to save every single penny they can.

[Anonymous No.6642048]

>>6642038
Most of the coding is already automatized by simply copying and pasting modules, frameworks and program segments that have been already developed, you don't need to write from scratch an engine to display a window with a message when there's over a thousand you can choose from.

The actual problem with programming comes with debugging, anyone who's done coding knows that's the part that takes most of the time in software development, specially when the errors come from using the wrong variables, a mistake in an operation or a letter missing from a database calling, which sometimes don't even make the program to crash but simply throw botched results since the computer thinks that nothing's going wrong with the code.

[Anonymous No.6642096]

>>6642026
ChatGPT can write out whatever code you ask for. There was a software guy who used it in his job before he was caught. It's already happening. Creative jobs like arts & music will still be around, but officewagies will be suicide watch because of AI. Google has already taken the AI-pill. Their search engine is already gone full AI. I predict other tech companies are gonna do the same.

[Anonymous No.6642100]

>>6641361
AI shitter doesn't understand how img2img works. It's literally traces art of existing images.

[Anonymous No.6642214]

>>6642096
>ChatGPT can write out whatever code you ask for.
Now make it debug the code, with 100% surgical precision, leaving the complete program absolutely free of bugs.
Over half of the development process time is invested in debugging, and with the amount of error, glitches and bugs current software (applications and games) have, there'll be work for code monkeys for a LONG time.

[Anonymous No.6642236]

>>6642214
code monkeys don't debug code

[Anonymous No.6642252]

I

[Anonymous No.6642526]

>>6641374
>>6641498
>calling people niggers and threatening them with violence
If anyone is being aggressive it's you lol. Literally no self-awareness.
>>6641505
But they did win. AI exists and nothing is going to change that. They're simply stating that, nothing more, and people are mad about it.
>>6641961
Nothing is being stolen so it's not stealing.

[Anonymous No.6642701]

Honestly, if you buy AI shit, you deserve to get scammed out of your money.
Good on pajeets for being able to make some cash

[Anonymous No.6642764]

>>6642526
>y-you are aggressive!
way to miss the point, moron

[Anonymous No.6642765]

>>6642526
>Nothing is being stolen so it's not stealing.
The fuck you talking about? AI runs on stolen assets, that's why it can't be copyrighted and devs are staying the fuck off it

[Anonymous No.6642798]

>>6642765
Nothing is being stolen, so it isn't stealing. It can't be copyrighted because the law hasn't caught up to the technology. Devs(talking about vidya?) are using it regardless though.

[Anonymous No.6642837]

>>6642798
It's stealing the images "source code".

[Anonymous No.6642846]

>>6642837
No it isn't retard.

[Anonymous No.6642878]

>>6642846
why not?

[Anonymous No.6642891]

For third worlders, the AI fanbox flipping is """good money"""

For everyone else, it's not even minimum wage. It's not worth the electricity or the time. It's just ugly shit you see clogging up art sites.
>guys, look at my meme fetist, only interpreted for me by some shitty language model attached to a diffusion model and a dozen others!
This is all so obnoxious, lmao

[Anonymous No.6643119]

>>6642100
No it fucking doesn't you tech illiterate idiot. It's also not the same thing, not even close to creating a LORA/Fine Tuned model of a specific artist and/or style which is what the people on twitter and Pixiv were complaining about.

img2img believe it or not literally just uses an existing image in lieu of the random "noise" that is generated when you you start generating from a basic prompt. So instead of sampling and building upon random noise the AI instead has existing image to work with. How much of the original is changed or altered is dependent on the prompt, interpretation Scale and de-noising strength (i.e De-noising set to 0 does nothing, max nothing of the original exists).

[Anonymous No.6643181]

>>6641361
kek, you're showing your low IQ. You can't create concept art with AI. Do you even know what concept art is? And if that picture you posted is the best you can do, then I'm sorry but I can only laugh. It looks like absolute shit, no company would ever use that shit. Concept art needs to be clear and realistic. Look at your shit, now imagine giving that to a 3d artist, he will kill you. Pic related can NEVER be replaced by AI.

[Anonymous No.6643183]

>>6643119
It seems to me that you're...

https://i.4cdn.org/wsg/1682988764553416.webm

[Anonymous No.6643184]

>>6642096
chatgpt can’t even do a word count lmao

[Anonymous No.6643186]

>>6641520
>consenting training
why would anybody consent to having their work jammed into some soulless AI, for no monetary compensation on top of that?

[Anonymous No.6643187]

>>6643183
it seems to me that artists are in full defcon 4 seethe mode because a LITERAL child can now create art that is at above parity of most average artists.

[Anonymous No.6643188]

>>6642765
and pirating isn't stealing yet you can get your ass fucked for it
retarded pajeet nigger

[Anonymous No.6643190]

>>6643188
meant for >>6642798

[Anonymous No.6643193]

>>6643187
Again, it's all the same, it all looks the same, feels the same, has the same soulless looks and scenes, there is nothing organic, human or soulful about it. Humans have a sixth sense for that stuff. I don't know what your endgame is here, is it trolling? Or do you think you will make money with it or something and see real artists as your enemy now because we do all what we can to stop AI art becoming a thing? Seems to me that you're the one seething here anon or else you wouldn't come to a board dedicated to drawing.

[Anonymous No.6643202]

>>6642798
>Nothing is being stolen, so it isn't stealing. It can't be copyrighted because the law hasn't caught up to the technology.
No, it can't be copyrighted because it's working on stolen shit and it's just an automated plagiarizing machine
If this guy >>6642024 got kicked for plagiarism, the same applies to any AI pic made "in the style" of anyone who didn't give his consent

[Anonymous No.6643203]

>>6643187
>it seems to me that
No

[Anonymous No.6643224]

>>6643187
>a LITERAL child can now create
this the pure cope right here. you targeting the top artists of the world and creating cheap imitations of their images doesn't make you anything other than a mere commissioner. i know you've been told this a million times, but it won't stop being true no matter how many times you try to deny it. the artists you're scraping tell you to fuck off because you're a worthless shitbag with no skill. you're gonna have to deal with this being a fact for the rest of your life

[Anonymous No.6643234]

https://twitter.com/tadanojako/status/1654676274089197568

[Anonymous No.6643749]

>>6643119
StableDiffusion states on their site that the AI uses a web crawler to get the images, then copies those same images into a dataset. The end result is usually something that looks similar to the original image. How the hell is that not considered tracing?

Look up any retro anime generated with AI. Guarantee you it is AI traced.

[Anonymous No.6643912]

>>6643193
I get the feeling he's trying to delude himself that he's now somehow superior to us "artlets" yet he is everything described by this anon >>6643224

And he's right in every word. We all know it. He's just an oportunistic parasite trying to take credit for what he's comissioned from a plagiarism-AI handed to him by greedy megacorporations.
I'm happy we're finally seeing some sanity again with these new laws making it harder for these bugmen to make money of off this exploitation.

Regardless the whole gig has been properly fucked and we might not ever see it become lucrative for REAL creatives ever again. Although I don't know. Just speculating on that one.

What I do know though is that no buttonpushing bugman is above me in terms of creativity. No amount of crying, whining and bitching will ever change that fact.

[Anonymous No.6644205]

>>6643224
Unlike him, a literal child can create.

Even toddlers that shit themselves can pick up crayons and make art, something AI flags are too mentally challenged to do.

[Anonymous No.6644211]

>>6643186
Five people did apparently.

Five (5), as in five fingers, five out of 42.7 million that is.

[Anonymous No.6644212]

>>6643202
>No, it can't be copyrighted because it's working on stolen shit and it's just an automated plagiarizing machine
Not true at all because you can train your own models with uncopyrighted work and they'll still reject it according to their current rules.
It will change though, cope and seethe all you want.

[Anonymous No.6644213]

>>6643749
Tracing is copying 1:1 or close to it. AI is creating something entirely new.

[Anonymous No.6644504]

>>6639111
>And by similar, I mean, it uses the same color contrast, bad shading, and worst of all, the uncanny combination of 3D, realistic texture, and 2D
Thank you. Had the exact same issue looking at the current state of DeviantART, all AIshit looks exact the same, it's worse than modern moe anime at this point

[Anonymous No.6644525]

>>6643119
>Aixels

[Anonymous No.6644735]

>>6643119
I see 7 hands