[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/ic/ - Artwork/Critique


View post   

File: 685 KB, 3520x2903, A82C1195-A610-4468-83EE-2518C408E1D1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6598348 No.6598348 [Reply] [Original]

Even pros have off days.

>> No.6598350
File: 1019 KB, 1920x2304, 64BC4EDF-673B-4487-9F06-198893E8775C.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6598350

>> No.6598354

>>6598348
where's the mistake?

>> No.6598356
File: 327 KB, 1863x2096, 676F93CB-855C-46A5-97B4-8DA824B320CE.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6598356

>> No.6598357

Oh, I see it

>> No.6598358
File: 595 KB, 1494x2000, DF484EF2-F851-4C38-8335-2DB45D79FBCC.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6598358

>> No.6598361
File: 129 KB, 900x1200, 92009663-92D8-4B94-AB35-5588DDCAAF1A.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6598361

>> No.6598367

>>6598354
The composition is godawful. Look at all that unbalanced blank space.

>> No.6598372

>>6598348
haha wow, imagine fucking up something so subtle yet vital. ?Did he re-up a fixed one or just own it?

>> No.6598373

>>6598367
i thought it was the neck placement being way off to one side

>> No.6598375

>>6598367
It's obviously balanced by the text.

>> No.6598378

>>6598375
Not even close

>> No.6598380

>>6598378
And you are?

>> No.6598387

>>6598348

I hope she gets some urgent medical attention for her dislocated shoulder

>> No.6598388

>>6598367
>>6598375
Post how you would fix it. Legitimately curious.

>> No.6598391

That's the problem with this forum, it's full of narcissistic losers who think they know about art but have never created any.

>> No.6598392

>>6598367
It's the large cranium

>> No.6598393

>>6598348
>>6598350
>>6598361
The mistakes are all in their shoulder, right? Or am I am ngmi?

>> No.6598394

Still living in mom's basement... not going to make it.

>> No.6598395

>>6598361
>>6598348
>>6598356
>>6598358
I don’t see what’s wrong with any of these pictures. So clearly it’s not a big mistake and nobody actually cares since it’s only viewed for 0.1s as we scroll through it on social media.

>> No.6598398

>>6598395

You don't see the issue with the left leg in this one?
>>6598356

>> No.6598399

nobody itt pointed out the actual mistake yet.
ngmi, the lot of you.

>> No.6598401

>>6598399
The mistake is that you weren't aborted.

>> No.6598403
File: 3.17 MB, 500x282, 1547175727144.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6598403

>> No.6598404

>>6598399
The more people that post and don’t see it, the more of a retard you become. You should realize that with your big art brain. How much time do you waste trying to get stuff 100% correct when 99.999% of all viewers EXCEPT FOR JUST YOU don’t care. Think about how much of your life you have wasted. And how nobody cares about what you care about. Think about how sad your existence is. That you see something that nobody else sees or cares to look for. You’re so alone in your journey in art. You think you see an injustice that few other savants can see. You want to pride yourself in identifying its subtlety. But you just look like a fucking retard autist. The greatest thing you will accomplish is making this thread and getting anonymous people to respond to you because nobody cares about your art. You probably don’t even draw.

>> No.6598407
File: 128 KB, 684x1000, 1573219675583.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6598407

when you see it...

>> No.6598408

The big mistake is that all of this stuff is digital.

>> No.6598416

>>6598407

>AI hands

>> No.6598422

>>6598404
Fine, you win. The mistake is the sphenoid wing of the sternomastoid is upside down.

>> No.6598473

>>6598395
You'll garner more long term attention from making music than you ever will from any piece of art you'll create. Any artist should know this. Unless you make smut, no one cares about your art.

>> No.6598510

>>6598391
Purpose of the thread is to show even great art has mistakes in them. We aren't always perfect and that's ok. The final image can still be appreciated.

>> No.6598513

>>6598407
Sakimi is low hanging fruit but she's the best example of
>>6598510

>> No.6598533

>>6598407
lmao

>> No.6598545

If only these artists had posted these as WIPs on here asking for feedback and critique...

>> No.6598550

If you’re going to make a retarded thread like this at least point the mistakes, don’t just post the pics

>> No.6598605

>>6598550
That ruins the point.

>> No.6598625
File: 312 KB, 1400x1100, 30D6E3BA-74B5-4DD7-9CEC-D07F60D988F7.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6598625

I got one.

>> No.6598630
File: 93 KB, 800x1588, EF7361B6-8FFF-4CB0-A32E-8D8B9B420AFF.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6598630

Another

>> No.6598632
File: 10 KB, 240x240, f55016792f418582c788e46acbefc17a.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6598632

>>6598625
>Ruan Jia if he wasn't Asian, but really wanted to be.

>> No.6598645

>>6598632
This dude looks like the guy from Blood on the Dancefloor. The one who groomed kids. I didn’t know that hairstyle was still in use.

>> No.6598697

>>6598354
Neck is placed on top of the left shoulder and the fingers are all of the same size.

>> No.6598715

>>6598367
Getting your panties in a twist over that is like saying a drawing of a character with a white background sucks compositionally.
Get a life man, or better yet go draw you filthy ngmi

>> No.6598755
File: 133 KB, 736x1086, 78c63bd8fdb73be393728f21ab022773.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6598755

Its important to wait some time to see your work with fresh eyes otherwise you would end up with something like this

>> No.6598768

>>6598755
that is quite hard to look at. Remember, clear silhouettes. Shape meld if you must, but be careful.

>> No.6598775

>>6598755
natty?

>> No.6598789

>>6598768
yes, and proportions are all fucked up, long torso, short legs

>> No.6598812

>>6598354
There's a misalignment between her left arm, her head+neck and her torso+rest of the body. Her left arm and neck imply we're looking at her from the side, while her body says 3/4. Since the body is 3/4, the neck should come out of the in-perspective middle of her torso, aka be moved more to out left. Either that or redraw the whole body to be rotated so we see more of the left side of the torso and less of the front.

>> No.6598883

most of these are still great imo
the concept is more important than perfection

>> No.6599067

>>6598348
>>6598350
>>6598407
>>6598625
>>6598755
all these and how ell A.I art has taken off has made me realize how much normies are more forgiving than crabby art fags are.

>> No.6599082

>>6598358
it would look worse if it wasn't "wrong" tho

>> No.6599141

>>6598348
>>6598350
>>6598356
>>6598358
>>6598361
>>6598407
>>6598625
>>6598630
>>6598755
now post your work^_^

>> No.6599146

>>6598812
That's a lot of words to say "I don't understand anatomy".

>> No.6599156

>>6599141
you first <3

>> No.6599164

>>6598755
the issue I have is that it takes too long to really start noticing the flaws. I have to not look at something for a real long time before I get the effect where I can notice flaws in my art

>> No.6599885

How many of these are actually mistakes?

>> No.6599901

>>6598354
A 'mistake' should be glaringly obvious to anyone the moment their eyes hit it, even at a distance or smaller image.
Most people here however are 'eye trained' to look specifically for increasingly small mistakes over time, and they often have to search for about a minute or so, for most people this pic would look fine at a distance or normal eye view.
Pro Tip, if it takes you more than five seconds to see the 'offness' of an image, it will at least pass most people's inspection who aren't artists or designers.

>> No.6599957

>>6599901
This kinda proves the point. Artwork with minor mistakes don’t need to be glaringly bad. And even pros make beg mistakes at times. There’s no reason to cry over your art not being perfect, because even mistakes can make a piece more enjoyable.

>> No.6599960

>>6599164
just flip your canvas bruh

>> No.6599970

>>6598348
Yours is just a coping mechanism for making yourself feel better about the fact that you suck at drawing.
Instead of wasting your time with this,

JUST

FUCKING

DRAW

>> No.6600030

>>6599970
I am drawing. What about posting great art with mistakes is a coping mechanism faggot?

>> No.6600145

When is it ok to break anatomy like this? Sakimi does it often and she get scathing for it. Why is that different from OP?

>> No.6600227

>>6599960
I know to flip my canvas dude, it doesn't always help

>> No.6600370

>>6600227
Just flip your eyes then bud

>> No.6601381

>>6600145
Sakimi gets more shit because of many reasons. But the only issue is sometimes her mistakes are really noticeable. Even to non artists.

>> No.6601498

>>6598407
This one made me laugh. I was looking at all the details, thinking it might be in the shoulder or maybe she has three arms or something. Eventually I started thinking that maybe this picture is a prank and there’s not actually something wrong with it…

>> No.6601548
File: 69 KB, 471x720, EPqqfgzU4AYbqqY.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6601548

>>6598407
sometimes I look at my hands and get the dreadful feeling that I used to have or should have more fingers, ever happens to you guys?

>> No.6602291

>>6601498
It’s a Sakimichan post 2015. Of course there’s something wrong with it.

>> No.6602297

>>6598883
Why even try if you ain't gonna be perfect?

>> No.6602698

>>6602297
Because perfection is not achievable. Unless you’re drawing straight from reference.

>> No.6603037

>>6599141
>Thinking OP even draws.

>> No.6603048

>>6598755
Still looks kino

>> No.6603241

>>6603048
So does everything else in this thread.

>> No.6604162
File: 593 KB, 1752x2000, 26AE256B-BCBF-4971-AB4E-837117345786.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6604162

This is gorgeous but there’s little anomalies that can be easily ignored.

>> No.6604163
File: 366 KB, 1920x2530, 5C3DF222-DBF2-4511-BFC6-DBAD968032B7.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6604163

>>6604162
Again little stuff but the overall image is beautiful.

>> No.6604165
File: 73 KB, 631x893, 446965DB-7832-4C15-BC37-8A8BC7CB952E.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6604165

This guy has amazing greyscale and I use him as a study.

>> No.6604372

>>6604165
i'm scared of colour too bro

>> No.6604552
File: 252 KB, 1440x1600, 272C7FAC-0FCC-4652-83FC-064247FB42E2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6604552

It’s weird because it’s kind of a stylistic choice but also wonky.

>> No.6604565

>>6604552
This is disgusting, not just the fucked up face but the tiny palm and long ass fingers too

>> No.6604612
File: 196 KB, 900x1200, 1680931175363352.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6604612

>>6598393
hey anon. not an artist as I'm only a beginner, but regarding >>6598361 I see this mistake a lot in general, and it's a hip issue that keeps killing my boners in coom art. it's an anatomy mistake, because it's like the hip extends into the a thigh-like formation and then the full leg with another thigh is attached to that formation. try to imagine how this character would look like from behind, it would have a massively huge and deformed left glute (from her perspective). her right hip is fine, but her left hip makes no sense. tl;dr this is why you should not skip bone structure when learning anatomy, at least that's my 2 cents. lines should convey a general idea of what I mean, obviously i didn't align everything properly

>> No.6604617

>>6599141
Bruh the posters are literally implying that these are great artworks with one big mistake and arent making this grand harsh criticism to warrant them to somehow be master artists. Are you fucking stupid?

>> No.6604623
File: 1.88 MB, 1890x723, 5803.245000000061_image.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6604623

>>6604612
here's another example of what I mean. pardon the furshit, but correcting this image to convey my message is easier. I see this mistake all the time, and it never stops making me seethe

>> No.6604624

Mistakes give it soul though

>> No.6604634
File: 131 KB, 900x1200, seems fine?.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6604634

>>6604612

>> No.6604642

>>6604634
das it mane, thanks.

>> No.6604763

>>6604165
Who's this guy??? I love it... :o

>> No.6604766

>>6604165
Nvm.. found it. I'm a moron. Tim Liu for anyone else who's wondering...

>> No.6605075

>>6598473
Agree, I recently started with music production, it's quite tough though, but I feel like just about anyone can make decent music with the computer if they try for x amount of years but I don't necessarily think everyone will achieve success with music after x amount of effort (same for visual art)

>> No.6605084

>>6604623
Are you sure that's correct?

>> No.6605089

>>6604634
So wrong it hurts

>> No.6605995

>>6604565
But it’s technically amazing. Of course you can call it render monkey but he makes drawings like this all the time. Like anime mouths on realistic characters.

>> No.6606002
File: 422 KB, 1920x2133, 7DB7337D-3CE7-4128-BD57-80A4F6BEEFED.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6606002

>>6605995
Example

>> No.6606007
File: 171 KB, 1440x856, C977AA2A-2B7F-45AC-BEC7-40351359A7D2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6606007

>>6606002
And here’s a less stylized piece from him.

>> No.6606788

>>6606007
This is way better. >>6606002
This one is uncanny.

>> No.6606791

>>6598354
It's all AI art.

>> No.6606793

>>6606002
Yikes. This is why we need AI.

>> No.6607190

>>6606791
>>6606793
Samefag kys.

>> No.6607193
File: 60 KB, 1200x676, 1658075873444306.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6607193

>> No.6607216
File: 1.02 MB, 1192x675, Screenshot 2023-04-14 203727.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6607216

>>6607193

>> No.6607219

>>6607216
lel, it's also not as much as a mistake as it is a fuck you to the commissioner for ripping him off but still really funny i just wanted to post it

>> No.6607224

>>6607219
Qrd?

>> No.6608025

At the end of the day good art doesn’t need perfect anatomy or perspective. But you should aim for it if you can

>> No.6608029

>>6606007
I don't understand why they put that shit horns on everything, it looks horrible.

>> No.6608034
File: 3.34 MB, 200x200, michael-jordan-laughing.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6608034

>>6606007
what the hell is that coming out of his ass????

>> No.6608621
File: 1022 KB, 1335x1920, 8BE71FE6-1FDD-4AB1-8363-D9DC69D186F2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6608621

>> No.6609415

>>6608621
What's wrong with this?

>> No.6609520

>>6609415
Leg

>> No.6609527

>>6609415
pelvis

>> No.6611755
File: 1.18 MB, 3520x2903, 1680930504334590_FIXED.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6611755

>>6598348
yup, they can fuck up too

>> No.6611764

>>6611755
looks worse. If you could keep the gesture while fixing it it might look better.

>> No.6611766

>>6611764
>looks worse

put your glasses on grandpa

>> No.6611775

>>6611766
Ok dunning krugersan

>> No.6611908

>>6611764
It looks fine to me.

>> No.6611931

>>6598407
So, this was drawn by AI and she just sign it, right?

>> No.6611936

>>6611931
ya she had secret early access in 2018.

>> No.6613802

>>6611931
If AI was only trained on Sakimichan’s rush pieces I would be concerned for the AI.

>> No.6614585

>>6613802
She used to make really good shit though.

>> No.6616324

>>6606002
Style doesn’t need to follow anatomy.

>> No.6616776

>>6611764
>looks worse
you are outta your damn mind
although i would have left the rim lighting on the shoulder alone

>> No.6616804

>>6611755
Yeah this is better
though I'm surprised that nobody has pointed out how her right eye (the far eye) appears lower than the left.
You could say that the right eye is just slightly closed, but I can't help but feel that it looks strange.

>> No.6617588
File: 471 KB, 748x1080, 8DB3DE31-B9BC-424C-91B5-83FBC320AB73.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6617588

Asian genes.

>> No.6617894

>>6617588
I have seen 12 year olds draw like this. Kishimoto didn’t draw this.

>> No.6619572

dunning kruger thread

>> No.6619576

>>6598407
im retarded, point out the issue for me

>> No.6619584

>>6606002
>HEY, HEY APPLE

>> No.6620190

>>6611755
>remove all stylistic element for the sake of "correct anatomy"
>think it's better
/ic/ fags in charge of critiquing pros.

>> No.6620838

>>6619572
>>6617588
This is good?

>> No.6620905

ITT:
>fags with shit eye become aware of the fact
>gets defensive and calls non-shit eyed anons crabs

>> No.6621133

>>6599141
why

>> No.6622022

>>6620190
Think this >>6606002
looks good?

>> No.6623265

>>6622022
No but that's not the one I replied to. 90% of images ITT have no visible flaws let alone "big mistakes".

>> No.6623298
File: 163 KB, 1024x693, 1910CastleBattlements.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6623298

>> No.6623427

>>6598358
Can't unsee it but can't imagine it fixed either.

>> No.6623430

>>6598630

>> No.6623431
File: 21 KB, 739x415, images-1.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6623431

>>6623430
>>6598630
Fuck. I was laughing and forgot to attach the image.

>> No.6623936

>>6598407
>AI can't draw hACK!

>> No.6625146

>>6623265
All of these have visible mistakes. Use your eyes lmao.

>> No.6625158
File: 367 KB, 1305x1552, 3EA324FE-0A82-451D-99BF-E0F7B0AF4351.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6625158

>> No.6625166

>>6625146
I have human eyes, not crab eyes.

>> No.6625169

why the fuck hasn't this thread been deleted yet
it's literally a not-so-subtle "crab on someone who's miles ahead of you" thread

>> No.6625178
File: 466 KB, 1920x2918, 93EDAB10-0D9C-4A3E-9257-7B63904D4C21.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6625178

>>6625169
Because no one thinks these artists are bad but they recognize that sometimes artists even pros make mistakes and it’s fine to appreciate great art with noticeable issues.

>> No.6625179
File: 702 KB, 1705x2237, 5915B01E-195F-42AE-BDB6-044A58C2CF39.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6625179

Your art doesn’t need to be perfect to be good.

>> No.6625193
File: 761 KB, 1920x2864, D858CC2C-90D4-4466-B807-F3514F07FF51.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6625193

This artist was trying something new.

>> No.6625196

>>6625178
stupid nigger crab bitch
sage

>> No.6625203
File: 252 KB, 787x1200, A48A7EF4-874F-42C4-BB94-E79AF8083457.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6625203

>> No.6625204

>>6625158
>Great Artwork

>> No.6625205
File: 282 KB, 1200x921, F051377E-58BB-4472-B874-BF6217573516.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6625205

>> No.6625226
File: 1.71 MB, 1920x2918, kaochicchai.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6625226

>>6625178

>> No.6625231
File: 263 KB, 1920x684, pavel-hristov-the-convert-process-2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6625231

>>6625226
so I made this edit, but I reverse searched the OG now and found his sketch, and I see what he was going for(which I unknowingly removed). Something was just lost in translation when he rendered it.

>> No.6625267
File: 738 KB, 1360x1150, take2.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6625267

aimed somewhere between the rough and clean lines.

>> No.6625858

>>6625178
>>6625226
>>6625231
>>6625267
What’s wrong with it? And what were they aiming for?

>> No.6625930
File: 199 KB, 300x348, comp.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6625930

>>6625858
Just uncanny, not exactly wrong, I've since seen their other art and don't think my "fix" really applies to their work, almost all their characters have odd proportioned faces for effect.
I thought they were aiming for rugged/slightly masculine female/big nose etc, my first edit just shrunk the features to more average proportions.

>> No.6626344

>>6625930
That’s a girl?

>> No.6626355

>>6626344
per the artist, pv_hristov, on instagram

"Just a nice young lady."

>> No.6626386

>>6625858
Literally nothing wrong with it. Just some guy "fixing" a face cause he doesn't like the artist's style. This kind of weird mentality seems to be this thread's theme actually.

>> No.6626399

>>6626386
I like his style, But seeing it out of context of the rest of his work, and in this thread instead for the first time, I thought it may have been a mistake(initially), the kind artists make when you get used to odd proportions as you paint, and don't realize until you see it with fresh eyes.

>> No.6626920

>>6619576
You are not retarded, anon, you good. It's the amount of fingers

>> No.6627330

>>6626399
I don't get what he's going for it looks bad.

>> No.6628849

>>6623936
Using Sakimi as your excuse is pathetic.

>> No.6629884

>>6625205
What's wrong with it?