[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/ic/ - Artwork/Critique


View post   

File: 197 KB, 828x876, 9302D4E3-68A6-4EA0-A1CD-904DE3DAAC3D.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6564648 No.6564648 [Reply] [Original]

Why aren’t you doing this new trend /ic/?

>> No.6564653

>>6564648
>new
this is already old

>> No.6564660

>>6564648
Dude this was popular on tumblr before they banned porn what do you mean new?

>> No.6564662
File: 564 KB, 704x729, MM.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6564662

I don't want people on Twitter to think clicking the like button accomplished something. Like my account was some sort of place for a community to form instead of the unhinged ramblings and sketchbook of some random guy.

Also I'm /beg/ as shit and have no fans, the only way I'm reaching the second or third stage is to have goals in the single digits. and that's just pathetic

>> No.6564664

>>6564648
man why do people do this? I hate it so much and the art is usually not interesting either

>> No.6564665

>>6564648
Because it wouldn’t work unless you have a lot of people who want to retweet you in the first place. I have like 2-3 people who will retweet me and that’s on a good day at peak hours. You need at least like 50 consistent people to rt in order to snowball something like picrel.

>> No.6564669

>just attract more bots and kids on your porn account
>just brand your account as some like/rt whore
Dont work if you don't have people boosting your account anyway.
What are you really accomplishing by collecting meaningless numbers from people who really don't give a shit?

>> No.6564678

>>6564648
it didn't work when i did it, what pipe line are these /beg/s in that gets their shit retweeted so fucking hard?

>> No.6564680

>>6564648
>How the fuck did this gets 25k likes?

>> No.6564686

>>6564648
>>6564669
Would it surprise you if I told you most of these big twitter artists purchase likes/retweets to artificially boost their engagement? Would it surprise you if I told you it’s dirt cheap to buy retweets? Would it shock you to know that these fake retweets actually affect view rate of these posts, causing more people to see them and even engage with them whereas they would not have otherwise done so? Sound fair? Sound natural?

It’s all fakery smoke and mirrors shit. Quit posting this bullshit. It doesn’t do anything on the same level that posting regularly and using ‘smart’ hashtags doesn’t do anything. Cheat to get ahead or accept it’s all rigged. Either way, no one will ever care about your work apart from a few people. They’re just manufactured, artificially inflated numbers on a screen. Nobody actually cares, no one is actually watching. Even big celebrities artificially boost their stats. Jay z or some big rapper was caught doing it on some music streaming app a few years back. None of it is real you retards.

>> No.6564695

>>6564686
Are you the
>why won't you just retweet people what does it even cost you
anon?

>> No.6564713

>>6564686
I guess you could pay pajeets to do it

>> No.6564778

(you) will never get 25k likes
ever

>> No.6564779

>>6564778
Honestly? Who cares.
Internet points doesn't mean jack

>> No.6564782

>>6564778
Speaking from experience?

>> No.6564785

>>6564779
T. Coping shitter that gets no likes

>> No.6564799

>>6564785
No likes, yes.
Coping no, lol
I haven't uploaded anything in 3 months because I'm grinding sketches

My satisfaction is more important than internet points

>> No.6564835
File: 31 KB, 450x600, 1652044515241745.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6564835

I don't know, OP.
Why am I not wearing panties and posting pictures of my manly, shaved ass online for old men to throw money my way?

>>6564662
Is that your art?
It's not pretty, but it's well-rounded, it has a personality.

>> No.6564843

>>6564648
These retweet games just feel so uncouth.
I can understand enjoying the dopamine of big numbers, but begging for them like this just feels pathetic.
When I need a dopamine fix is just draw a vtuber getting fucked by the last animal they mentioned on stream

>> No.6565008 [DELETED] 
File: 149 KB, 1176x1974, FrYiH8OaIAAx6Ll.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6565008

>>6564648
i am

>> No.6565011

>>6564648
I do!
>>6564664
>>6564669
Its fun

>> No.6565214

>>6564686
nah you're a retard. there's like 25k hearts and 2k retweets - if it was purchased from SEO hacker it would be much closer BUT the only ones who do use SEO hacks are those fucking "elon musc crypto giveaway" scams or other crypto scams.

if you make a new art-based account the stuff you'd see are still good art either way and it's not like that artist is bad. it's still true you can manipulate the numbers with some money but that's also not good since you want actual people looking into your art and then do real commissions - boost/sponsoring your posts is much better but also building your own reputation.

>> No.6565246

>>6564686
why manipulate numbers though? What good does it get the artist? They dont make money off of this shit and they wont make money off of bots? For an ego boost? Who would feel an ego boost knowing their followers are bots?

>> No.6565253

>>6564779
>not drawing for likes and twitter followers
this is when you know someone's NGMI

>> No.6565254

>>6564648
this isn't new

>> No.6565281

Most of my OC's are underage.

>> No.6565323

>>6564648
That seems very pathetic

>> No.6565575

>>6564835
>Why am I not wearing panties and posting pictures of my manly, shaved ass online for old men to throw money my way?
Because you're not doing it.

>> No.6565605

>>6564648
If you're smart, you create one OC that you essentially write off to be whored out for clicks.

>> No.6565865
File: 43 KB, 517x597, shitpost.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6565865

>>6565323
it is but it also seems to work. I'm sure some of these numbers were paid for but you'd have to be insane to buy this many on an account this small.

>> No.6565868

>>6564648
I'm not a third worlder you cunt.

>> No.6565879

>>6564648
Because I don't draw for horny people for free

>> No.6566003

>>6564648
idk it's kind of creepy. If anything I would do it the other way around and dress someone up.

>> No.6566005

>>6565865
It's getting real pathetic

>> No.6566022

>>6566005
Welcome to social media. Don’t do shit like this, you won’t thrive

>> No.6566026

>>6566003
Or do one with different outfit variations

>> No.6566055

Honestly this is how you market your shit. Hop on trends, create a following, maybe start making things you like and hope someone bites. Being a clout chaser may seem pathetic at first but its a much faster way of being a GMI. If you're an artist and you want to have some semblance of financial success, you are going to need some form of attention.

>> No.6566063

this is just the evolution of Curtain Call

>> No.6566074

>>6566063
yeah, but it encourages retweets. so its more clout for you

>> No.6568164

a better stripgame would be using patreon/subscribestar numbers and retweets/reposts instead of just likes

>> No.6568168

>>6568164
This assumes twitterfags have money, and which most dont. And those who do are probably already patrons

>> No.6568173

>>6565865
The art is ugly as fuck. And no, I will not post my work, it is not any better.

>> No.6568177

>>6564678
I think it's either because the algorithm boosted their post or they are friends with some prolific ppl

>> No.6568192

>>6568173
Coombait, the bar of entry is lower

>> No.6568326

>>6564664
Drives interaction. A number-chasing game, that's literally all it is.

>> No.6568358
File: 109 KB, 828x556, 851D19B8-81C0-4A00-85F5-6ED4991F2B9F.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6568358

>>6564648

>> No.6568411 [DELETED] 

>>6564648
Because I don't self-insert and girl is not my girlfriend faggot

>> No.6568477

>>6564648
I like her clothed

>> No.6568545

>>6566003
I know, right? this poor unsuspecting real girl is being stripped of her clothing for views.

>> No.6568551

>>6564648
The attention whore festival
Anyone who does that goes on the blocklist

>> No.6568555

>>6568551
>blocked by a literal who with no money
Oh the horror

>> No.6568556

>>6568551
At some point I’ll consider going on /g/ and telling the AI shitters to train their AI on artworks of retards that do that to spit in their faces

>> No.6568595

There's lots of fart-sniffing art fads on twitter in general at the moment ('What's my most iconic drawing', 'Draw this in your style'/give me fanart, etc)

>> No.6568625

>>6568358
Hot...

>> No.6568976

>>6564680
If you have lot of followers its easy. Same reason why dogshit video from youtuber with millions of subs gets more views then objectively better video from few thousand subs channel

>> No.6571668

>>6565865
how do coomers have such strong libidos?

>> No.6571779
File: 62 KB, 1200x1000, yep.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6571779

>>6564648
my oc doesn't wear any clothes.

>> No.6571784

>>6571779
this is avatar fagging, right? boards wide?