[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

View post   
File: 557 KB, 924x612, 1675362232852291.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6506764 No.6506764 [Reply] [Original]

AI "art" and NLP at the moment is just iterative if-else markov chains doing applied statistics on a given dataset, which means it follows patterns other AI designed to find said patterns can and will pick up on. No many how many ways they try to hide them, a new discernible pattern will ALWAYS form. It also means artists can cloak their work with "junk data" imperceptible to humans to fuck up any model that tries to steal their work.

All social/art platforms have to do is introduce account termination for the use of AI in ToS. When they sweep through their image library and detect the use of AI in them, they can disable your account, your """artist""" handle is lost forever, you get exposed as a talentless proompter for all to see, and then you're fucked.

AI shitters get the rope.

>> No.6506770

>>6506764
>It also means artists can cloak their work with "junk data" imperceptible to humans to fuck up any model that tries to steal their work.
Fascinating, but the last attempt at this I saw seemed like a sketchy cash-grab.
What prevents a redditor from screenshotting your work to make it readable by AI again? Like they’d have to be a very dedicated and persistent sperglord but AIfags tend to be one-note autists anyway.

>> No.6506772
File: 136 KB, 820x791, anon seething.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6506772

>>6506764
> NOOO you can't simply make better art than me anonnn!!
> You wi- will se- see! They're gonna ban AI images, they're bad!

>> No.6506811

lmao

>> No.6507271
File: 390 KB, 1202x1212, 1673729735340322.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6507271

>>6506772
One day it will be your turn to cope n' seethe.

>> No.6507325

I dont even know how to make ai art, i tried once and it just came up with globs lol

>> No.6507338

Is it rerun thread and reply day?

oh. it's /ic

>> No.6507347

>>6506764
>28
>looks in his late 40s

>> No.6507608

>>6506772
Art proompt? More like dog poopmt hsha gottem

>> No.6507956

>>6506772
>better
>coping this hard

>> No.6508020
File: 32 KB, 640x480, czqqnk5rlt0a1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6508020

>>6506764
Aifags unironically look like that

>> No.6508157

>>6508020
you can smell this stinky techfag from here

>> No.6508656

>>6506764
You're saying you would add some invisible watermark to your image that would show up in AI from it trying to recreate your style? Unfortunately that's not really how it works. The dataset contains billions of images. Even a few million images adding this watermark would do nothing because there are an immeasurable amount of other factors in the noise. I don't know why you care anyway. If AI art is ugly and easily identifiable then why are you so worried about it not being identified. Plus the models are already trained. The cat isn't going back in the bag.