>>6489029
>Everyone, and I do quite literlaly mean everyone, told me you don't really have to be good to draw porn. You're basically cheating the system by doing it, because coomers are an easy audience to cater.
>I don't want to hear anything about "oh your work just isn't good enough"
You are both right and wrong. You need talent regardless, because if you didnt need talent, your job would be filled by more less skilled retards, this works not just for porn, but in basically every aspect of our society. Just look at AI slop, it has its audience and yet most AI troons are not nearly as successful as the average artist that draws, because their job is easy so their market gets oversaturated much easier. Yes, coomers have generally lower standards then people searching for art that is not coomery, but to be successful coomer artist you still need at least some talent and make your pictures at least somewhat appealing. If you were not doing coomer art, you would get 0 or 2 followers instead of 50, your art just sucks ass and making the competition easier wont lift you from the bottom of the barrel. You have to either grind, use tricks, be creative with fetishes, give your characters lot of character, or some other stuff. Coomers might coom to bad art, but if there is somebody who draws the same stuff as you but better, they will prefer to spend time watching their coom, hence why your only followers are coomers that favourite every single picture they click on that does not kill their boner.