[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

View post   
File: 254 KB, 1920x2025, 1671163632002620.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6423465 No.6423465 [Reply] [Original]

Don't care I will still save your files and train my models with them and you can't do anything about it.
Try not uploading them to the internet at all, the moment you upload them to the internet they are mine and I will do whatever I want with them - even if you don't upload them maybe someday you'll get hacked because artists are not very tech savvy and they will leak to the internet. It's over for you. Excellent artists will adapt, always have a demand and survive but you (the 90%) will not.

>> No.6423469

In fact the first ones to backstab you will be your industry bosses to save a few bucks.

>> No.6423472
File: 1.93 MB, 1000x1351, SweetDoughnuts.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6423472

>>6423465
Just try remove these watermarks. Hint, you can't, they have random gradients within the text. I am safu.

>> No.6423481

>>6423465
I will also save your goyslop and repost it as my own and there is nothing you can do about it Pajeet.

>> No.6423484
File: 1.11 MB, 766x777, weird eyes but okay.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6423484

>>6423465
like 99% sure the art used in your pic is AI gen'd, not sure what your optics are?

>> No.6423487

>>6423465
why are you freaking out you can't scrape their work? just scrape your own drawings anon.

>> No.6423491

>>6423465
OK but why do you feel the need to make a thread about it

>> No.6423503

>>6423491
It's the same literal schizo discord tranny who thinks his little community is part of some movement.

>> No.6423513

>>6423465
That's cool. Any AI you generate is non-copyrightable anyway. We can just slap it all on Redbubble and make some extra bucks. Thanks!

>> No.6423516

>>6423472
actually pretty neat and cyperpunk-esque. might try something like this

>> No.6423521

>>6423465
>the moment you upload them to the internet they are mine
lol, lmao

>> No.6423524

>>6423521
you know there are a lot of countries that will tell you to fuck off or just don't care if you try your western copyright shit there

>> No.6423523

>>6423465
Why bother scraping beg or woke trash when you can scrape like cowboy bebop or something and make some sakuga. Go ahead anon I believe in you

>> No.6423534

>>6423521
>>6423524
russia for example is currently displaying avatar 2 for free on russian cinemas, what are you going to do about it?

>> No.6423543

>>6423534
They're getting raped sideways by terrible policies, at the very least they get to see a shitty James Cameron movie.

>> No.6423564

>>6423465
I wish you /g/uys would generate a personality and get a life

>> No.6423567

>>6423465
>you can't own your art and I can steal it and do whatever I want with it FUCK YOUR COPYRIGHT LET ME STEAL YOUR SHIT I WANT IT I WANT IT I WANT IT AAAARGHGAHRHAGHR
>immediately turns around and expects to make a profit off of the back of stolen work and have a job making it somehow
laughing out loud
laughing my ass off, even

>> No.6423578

>>6423567
Not even old-school tracefags were this unhinged about their bullshit.
Granted, OP is probably falseflagging, but still, it seems to be common sentiment.

>> No.6423603

>>6423465
Some pretty high-strung moralistic values aside, there's not really a convincing argument why AI shouldn't be used and why AI is theft. It might have been more blatant theft at first, much as the way a budding artist too closely copies what inspired them in the first place, but with time as what has happened here, the sources are so well hidden through an amalgamation of influences that you can't really pin point any particular artist that was copied, it's all over the place.

If these artists want to be paid, and paid well, they'll have to give a compelling reason for that happen.

>> No.6423604

>>6423603
>he made it through a post without referencing Lor of the Rings this time
You're making good progress, anon. I'm glad the autism treatments are working

>> No.6423610

>>6423604
You're a clown. AI art is advancing at a ridiculous rate and you're replying to an anon about some LOTR references. This board won't be around much longer to be honest (probably a good thing, really). The jannie trannies seem to have given up on erading the AI thread stoo.

>> No.6423616
File: 88 KB, 720x1195, ai artist honour among thieves.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6423616

>>6423465

>> No.6423650

>>6423603
>anthropomorphizes the machine
>believes that it's an all powerful tool that can do anything and everything

>believes that in that future he will be needed, have a job, and be paid

kekking extreme keks
rolling on the floor, perchance

>> No.6423658

>>6423650
Artists, prior to this year, were the most vocal proponents against the corporate hegemony of copyright law because, while good in theory, copyright law favors corporations with more legacy IP and lawyers, and screws over the "little guy".

Now they've become the most ardent supporters of a degree of intellectual ownership far more encroaching than anything any legal theorist has ever attempted to try justifying. They're arguing that every brushstroke, every minor accoutrement of style, no matter how minor or derivative, is entitled to lifetime copyright protection just because a "human" made it.

The real source of all this angst is narcissism. Most artists are naturally narcissists. They want to believe their creative vision is inexorably tied to the golden nugget of "self" that only they possess, like the One Ring in Lord of the Rings.

They want to believe that there is something so special, unique, unquantifiable about their creative vision that anything they produce will be forever unique. The fact that all the apparent creativity of most artists can be easily replicated by AI art engines, and the fact that those engines can clearly and transparently spell out the exact things that they used to generate the art. strikes at the core of this artistic narcissism. These artists realize their creative output is no greater than the sum of their influences, so they will perform the classic tactic, accuse their opponents of doing what they themselves are doing, not realizing the irony.

>> No.6423660
File: 120 KB, 1000x1000, lagomorphic_diffusion16.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6423660

>>6423658

>> No.6423667

>>6423658
This tactic is well-covered in a book/autobiography of a fighting game champion, called “Playing to Win,” which boils the charade down into how short of cheating, any thing you do within the boundaries of what the game allows you to do to win is fair game, and it doesn’t matter how cheesy it is, a win is a win.

The worst is the avalanche of advancement that these AI tools have made in a relatively short period of time, and equally the responding butthurt. I don’t think it’s just narcissism. I think it’s fear and loss of identity in a dramatically changing world. There are no masters of fate in this arena.

>> No.6423669

>>6423472
how do i do this but not have the text over it, we must break the AI's pattern recognition

>> No.6423675

The AI Gofundme is at $105k!!!

>> No.6423676

>>6423472
artists name plsu

>> No.6423707

>>6423465
No one loves you kill yourself so we can piss on your grave