/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

[Anonymous No.6413359]

Is animation worth studying now?
Will ai be able to create animations from scratch any time soon?
Maybe stop motion is the future...

[Anonymous No.6413361]

>>6413359
It's over

[Anonymous No.6413368]

>>6413359

Yes and no. If you ever plan on working on Japanese animation you need a 4 year degree in anything. Then you need to know the language. Unless you’re one of those Gods on Twitter that studios in Japan beg for your semen (extremely unlikely) for freelance work your chance of getting in anime are low. You’re competing with Chinese and Japanese talent.

[Anonymous No.6413379]

>>6413361
The individual images look good but there's no actual animation there.
When will it be able to do stuff like this?
>>6413368
I'm just trying to think ahead to when 2d digital painting stuff is just completely dead in a few years - maybe internet artists will all have to shift toward the creation of sinple fluid animation over highly rendered single images? The inherent storytelling aspect of animation seems a lot harder for people to just desire to do away with, as well

[Anonymous No.6413389]

>>6413359
You know anon, I used to get tired of people replying to these threads with "yes, stop asking the same fucking questions that have been answered more than 10 times now in this board in the span of 3 months", but seriously, this is a borderline retarded question.
You draw because YOU WANT to draw, you animate because YOU WANT to animate, did you know there's a lot of artists that just do art for the sake of doing it? Just to express something onto the world? As a hobby? Only later is that they pursue this "more symbolic and deeper meaning" to their craft, which is honestly the only thing I can think people who are unable to do art want to accomplish with AI, they want to illustrate their "complex story" without the fun in drawing or modeling and putting in motion their ideas manually.
So yes anon, it is worth it, but only if you have an artistic mindset, doesn't matter how pretentious that reads. If you just want to bring your big brain ideas to the material world without the effort of learning the craft, then no anon, just wait 2 or 3 years and start prompting your way into the field of animation.
I thought we were into this because it was fun, just like nips customize their kits, just like teenagers learn to play guitars and pianos or learn to code to develop videogames and therefore didn't need to know if it was "worth it". I tell you this from the perspective of someone who used to make tons of stop motions of Halo Mega Blocks as a kid and just recently got into it again.

[Anonymous No.6413407]

>>6413389
I'm talking from a sort of game-theoretical point of view, as in how the work-meta is shifting within art, for the funsies of the conversation
But I get the point you have.
Thanks anon

[Anonymous No.6413412]

>>6413361
This is ai? Humans have literally been Ginny pigs for the future ai

[Anonymous No.6413417]

>>6413359
We probably have a year. The problem with making a good AI model for animation and live action is that they could run into the same problem as Disco Diffusion, they can't use copyrighted media. The best animation and film comes from companies, not indies unlike art and I don't think. Disney and Gihbli would be particularly happy if they found entire movies in the dataset. Maybe Google can because they own YouTube and thus have the most material to train on but they might have to put in an opt out feature and it definitely won't be open source meaning no porn for a while.

[Anonymous No.6413423]

>>6413379
>maybe internet artists will all have to shift toward the creation of sinple fluid animation over highly rendered single images?
Yeah, and as long as they aren't stupid enough to post every single thing they make there won't be enough data to scrape. Really hoping artists learned their lesson the first time.

[Anonymous No.6413427]

>>6413361
What is this supposed to convey

[Anonymous No.6413436]

Maybe small time artists should try to start forming small indie animation studios and pumping out a lot of small projects that way, having copywrite protections under a company would be very advantageous
Taking advantage of the western boom in interest in anime could prove lucrative
Just throwing ideas out there

[Anonymous No.6413444]

>>6413423
>Dont post your stuff on the internet if you dont want it stolen reeeee
Ok, then why even make it in the first place? Are you just gonna show it you your closed friend group of 5 people? Also, if you are not going to show it on the internet or in any commercial project (will inevitably end on internet), then why even fear the AI? You can still do it for yourself, AI wont steal away your ability to make it. Your friends will still be impressed if you show them that you did that yourself. If you are not going to post it on the internet and share it with the rest of the world, then why fear AI that will take away your spotlight? Your argument is as dumb as saying that if you dont want your dick to shrink, dont have sex and dont masturbate. Ok, but those are the only two things that you can do with a dick, and where dick size even matters. You can still piss with the dick, but the fact that your dick was shrunken does not affect your ability to piss, just affects your ability to get hard, which you dont use because you are scared of your dick shrinking.

[Anonymous No.6413452]

>>6413436
Fantastic idea. I've tried wrangling together other animators for this before but it's like pulling teeth. Idk maybe I'm off-putting or something but it seems like everyone wants to be a one man show rather than collaborate and become something bigger than ourselves. Which does not work in something as ambitious as animation. I'm going back to school next year so hopefully that will be my key to meeting motivated people who arent holding out for that offer from Disney.

[Anonymous No.6413454]

>>6413436
Would require some people to manage the finances, the marketing, being managers that make sure some loser wont just join and then do jack shit while promising to finish part of some project. How is this different from any other company? Also
>Implying AI faggots care about copyright unless it is with music
All the opt out images that are in all the datasets that artists are complaining about are copyrighted. The legal talk currently regarding the models is if the AI devs are allowed to train on copyrighted images in the first place, not that the artists should get copyright to get protected. Once AI video starts booming in quality, they will train it on the entire Hollywood catalogue from the past 40 years, as well as every youtube video ever.

[Anonymous No.6413456]

>>6413427
Cunny

[Anonymous No.6413461]

>>6413379
I feel very optimistic when someone uses that show as the container for that question.

[Anonymous No.6413468]

Fundamentally its the end for digital artists.
But you can still do it because you like it.

[Anonymous No.6413474]

>>6413461
It's just the animation I'm talking about, not the show or it's writing.
>>6413454
>Would require some people to manage the finances, the marketing, being managers that make sure some loser wont just join and then do jack shit while promising to finish part of some project. How is this different from any other company?
It's not, I guess the difference here would be to either join a large corpo or to through your hat in the ring and try to work at some sort of small startup that has proper ideals in mind ( Gearing themselves not toward being outright full of disdain for their artists and animators ) . The profit incentive would probably be hard to rangle with though, it's hard to talk of any of this while dealing with the necessary consequences of capitalism. Indie game studios are able to be successful by leveraging people's hatred of triple A while putting out simple games people enjoy, and while I think indie animation studios could leverage the disdain a lot of people have for big animation companies, people aren't going to be sitting down paying $5 a pop on steam to watch a 10 minute short-film. It might just be doomed.
>>6413468
return to TRADition, maybe?

[Anonymous No.6413476]

>>6413454
>The legal talk currently regarding the models is if the AI devs are allowed to train on copyrighted images in the first place, not that the artists should get copyright to get protected. Once AI video starts booming in quality, they will train it on the entire Hollywood catalogue from the past 40 years, as well as every youtube video ever.
If that's the case then everyone is fucked

[Anonymous No.6413478]

>>6413452
I'm taking my animation hobby further by going back to school for it next in January, too, anon. May god have mercy on our souls. Maybe I can find some cool people to form some sort of indie collective with to make sovlfvl, albeit completely unprofitable work with.

[Anonymous No.6413485]

>>6413417
>a year
Blatant shill posting in an AI troll thread.
Imagegen is, effectively, a glorified automated photobasher. I highly doubt we'll get anything beyond being able to generate generic pinups and simple compositions out of this thing, let alone comics, let alone ANIMATION, which has the highest base level requirements of draftsmanship to be able to do. A year? You can, with a straight face, quote us a YEAR for your meme machines to do that? You have to be kidding. You might be able to photobash pinups, you are NOT going to photobash animation. Imagegen's design will have to be fundamentally changed from the ground up for you proompters to have even a snowball's chance in hell of making animation of even remotely acceptable quality, ever, let alone a year.

[Anonymous No.6413492]

>>6413478
I wish you luck anon. I find that life has a way of rewarding me for not giving up.

[Anonymous No.6413504]

>>6413485
Thank you for another fortune telling there Ms. Cleo. Another jinx certifying the opposite happening next year.

[Anonymous No.6413518]

All the AI animation I've seen has been pretty bad.

[Anonymous No.6413524]

>>6413485
Theres already that manga. Thats been published.
This is cope, AI has taken huge fucking leaps in a few months. And animation is just another step away.
I hate it as much as anyone, but ignoring it will do you no good.

[Anonymous No.6413530]

>>6413504
The way that the technology works makes it fundamentally unsuited for animation. Actually, makes it unsuited for anything more demanding or focused than random pretty pictures and pinups.
Can it think in three dimensions? Can it even do something as simple as FOTM fanart accurately? If it can't do that, lol and lmao at the very thought of being able to do animation with it. You have no idea what you're talking about.

[Anonymous No.6413534]

The industry is permanently changing. Animation would be the logical next "victim".
This is happening.

[Anonymous No.6413538]

>>6413524
>that manga
Hmm, yes, "that" manga. Yes, yes, I see, that makes everything so much clearer now.

[Anonymous No.6413552]

>>6413538
Fucking I cant remember what retarded title the manga had, I saw it, and moved on.
If you've been paying somewhat attention on whats happening in the art world you should know what Im talking about.
But you're clearly not since every post you do here is cope and denial.

Ofcourse A.I comics will be a new thing. Like, are you kidding me. Basic 2D animation is not as far away as you thing either.
Open your fucking eyes.

[Anonymous No.6413555]

[Anonymous No.6413557]

>>6413530
>now revealing our never before seen AI animation model ready to go!
Okay and Russia will never attack Ukraine and Ai will never touch art because Columbia research said so 8 years ago. It's just a question of does Disney and its monster AI team get to it first.

[Anonymous No.6413571]

>>6413552
AI art looks like shit.

[Anonymous No.6413597]

>>6413571
Well yes, we all know that.
It wont stop existing tho, the tech will filter out all of us eventually.

[Anonymous No.6413602]

>>6413597
Back to driving a bus I guess.
Atleast I wont have to try so hard anymore.

[Anonymous No.6413606]

>>6413476
Yes, literally everyone, not just the creatives. This is why AI art is pivotal moment in AI development and in human history as a whole. This current AI art debacle either turns into fad too derivative to be used anywhere seriously, and will change the artistic landscape, or it will be the year when humanity finally found the first moral roadblock around AI and decided to let AI development loose, cursing all future jobs and the fate of humanity itself to be in the cold hands of ASI.

[Anonymous No.6413617]

>>6413417
Again, copyright is not the issue. AI bros use copyrighted pictures all the time without any shame. The reason that music gets pass is because there is less amount of frequencies in a song then there is pixels in picture. And there is way less desirable combinations of sound then there is combinations of shapes and colors. Most human music follows few sets of tempos that align with our biological mechanisms like breathing or heartrate. Instruments can only do so many sounds, and the same is for electro dubstep. If you let AI loose on music, it would start creating almost the exact copies of songs that listener would not be able to tell apart when listening to them for comparison. With Ai pictures and videos you cant say the same. Ask Ai to generate some public domain painting like the Starry Night from Vincent. It will give you blurry meshes that have incorrect number of clouds, some stars different and so on. Now if you listen to the music, it will become way way harder to notice, especially when the Ai is trained on certain human tempo that funnels certain sounds into their specific holes. If you looked at the diagram of the sound, you could easily see the differences, but when hearing it, not so much. This alone is enough to discourage the AI trainers from putting there copyrighted music, not because music copyright has privilege, but because they are too scared of overfitting that is much easier with music then with pictures.

[Anonymous No.6413623]

>>6413359
learning animation is still extremely important. the platforms available now can barely grasp a coherent image. Temporal anticipation, physical properties, environmental conditions, luminosity constituents and a series of other basics are out of reach for now. It will probably be some time before you find yourself prompting "walk cycle, my favorite waifu, cfg scale:9001, duration:00.10.00, frames:120" and then expecting a .mp4 to pop out.

[Anonymous No.6413629]

>>6413602
Just become cyborgs. /ic/ didn't think it could have humanism without eventually being dragged kicking and screaming into a post epoch did it?

[Anonymous No.6413631]

>>6413602
>self driving bus

[Anonymous No.6413633]

>>6413602
Make them pay or die trying.
Don't be a weakling.

[Anonymous No.6413672]

>>6413629
1. Yes, cyborgs over AI any day. Make humans better instead of making nonhumans better
2. Becoming cyborg wont help you animate. Putting animation diffusion inside your brain would make you no better then the average prompter that nobody would pay to (unless they lie about prompting)
>>6413602
>>6413631
Ironic how artists were replaced before self driving cars. And it took people like 5+ years of seriously working on self-driving cars, while artists were done by far more simpler AI in matter of just half a year. Maybe AIs are better at creativity then they are at calculating stuff. Wonder how people would react if you told them few years ago about this. The saddest thing is that artists got 0 warning that their carriers might be in danger, while truckers were being warned like 6+ years ago, enough time to change your carrier.

[Anonymous No.6413695]

>>6413617
>Again, copyright is not the issue. AI bros use copyrighted pictures all the time without any shame.
Law is slow but eventually we will see if they can get away with it Scott free. Napster was able to get away with violating Copyright for 2 years and it took 2 years before YouTube implemented copyright ID system. I assume it'll be a year before we get to see what the courts think of this technology and prehaps another before there is regulations.

[Anonymous No.6413703]

>>6413672
GANs have been in work for over 10 years.
>AIs are better at creativity
kek
they are good at pasting pretty color gradients in grids. The underlying structure and creativity of AI art is often child tier.

[Anonymous No.6413723]

>>6413672
>The saddest thing is that artists got 0 warning that their carriers might be in danger, while truckers were being warned like 6+ years ago, enough time to change your carrier.
That's really one of the worst parts about it. We could have already retrained for another field and had a few years of working under our belts.

[Anonymous No.6413726]

>>6413695
>2 years
Yeah, with the speed of AI research, I dont think there is enough time left for lawyers to fix this. Plus it would need to require brand new law since as far as I know, machine learning is not violating any copyright so far, so there will need to be some case made.

[Anonymous No.6413742]

>funded by koch and other major VCs partnered with Wal-Mart as well
It's over class 3 truck bros

https://electricautonomy.ca/2022/10/05/loblaw-driverless-trucks-gatik-toronto/

[Anonymous No.6413747]

>>6413742
Soon we will be free from this mortal coil

https://news.cornell.edu/stories/2022/06/technology-helps-self-driving-cars-learn-own-memories

[Anonymous No.6413757]

>>6413747
You say free but we all know how this ends.

[Anonymous No.6413788]

>>6413672
>artists
>replaced
Lol
Lmao even
Nobody wants your AI generated garbage and public perception of it gets worse by the day
Absolutely delusional

[Anonymous No.6413791]

>>6413788

[Anonymous No.6413795]

>>6413791
I have yet to see proof, just anecdotes.

[Anonymous No.6413798]

>>6413788
First of all, public perception of processes hardly ever matters in business, otherwise Apple wouldn't be making their phones in incredibly questionable locations
But hey, maybe if you keep telling yourself that noone wants the AI and whatever other coping, maybe it'll become real one day?

[Anonymous No.6413805]

>>6413788
Disney and Microsoft are pumping out tools and going hard on research to replace everyone. All you have is "LOL" and "LMAO" which may make you of use for their child sex trafficking rings.

[Anonymous No.6413818]

>>6413359
Is it worth studying if endgame is making amusing youtube animations for fun

[Anonymous No.6413819]

>>6413788
>saying this in a world where most beloved films are Marvel Goyslop Capeshit
ai will win because people are tasteless filth plebeians who will always choose flashy quick cheap garbage, ai will just replace those art whores churning out soulless shit with mindless machines

[Anonymous No.6413820]

even if ai takes over.
even if 2d art is dead.
i will still draw.
even if i'm homeless and poor.
i love it. ai will not take that away.
when the job of professional artists is to fix ai slop artifacts.
what kind of a filthy job is that? be a robots little bitch slave. i'd rather be a hobbyist for a rest of my life.
i will only follow people i know to be real and true artists.

[Anonymous No.6413823]

>>6413359
>Is animation worth studying now?
yes
>Will ai be able to create animations from scratch any time soon?
no
animation is not a single person art, unless you want to make cute 30 seconds clips on youtube, you will need a team. no ai will not fix this anytime soon

[Anonymous No.6413825]

>>6413805
Who the fuck cares about Disney and Microsoft as an artist anyway? lol They are long gone corporate machines that no longer have any semblance of soul or autonomy. If you strive to work at a place like that you should end yourself. Indie scene for art is always much more fulfilling anyway.

[Anonymous No.6413827]

I'm getting sick of these thinly veiled AI troll threads. This isn't the only board they're popping up on either, I've seen them on /co/ too. These retards are actively trying to destroy our boards. Get these shitheels contained already.

[Anonymous No.6413829]

>>6413827
Hiro should update the rules and make these threads against the rules.

[Anonymous No.6413830]

>>6413623
>>6413361
Are these two just img2img over video?

[Anonymous No.6413831]

>>6413820
>le humanity
People have and always will draw, paint and create.
Will my brushes and paints magically disappear every-time a weeb poops out an ai waifu???
Why do you cunts keep getting hysterical falling over each other to get on that lofty pedestal to declare your noble humanist manifestos???

Digital art was a mistake as big as social media and ai.

[Anonymous No.6413833]

>>6413827
Nobody cares about their random generated trash, so they have to resort to concern trolling now
>YWNBAA

[Anonymous No.6413835]

>>6413830
1st is just regular rendered, 2nd looks like a paint over, most "impressive" ai animations right now are just paint over, don't buy the hype, techs not even close to being mature yet

[Anonymous No.6413839]

>>6413827
Blame yourselves, you fucking ngmi crabs, clearly you love doom-posting over ai more than any other topic, lmao.

[Anonymous No.6413851]

>>6413839
We aren't the ones making these damned threads. The AI faggots are obvious nodraws that don't know a single thing about drawing. Except for maybe mikufag, who may or may not be joining in on this because he's always been a perpetually buttfrustrated crab angry because people keep dunking on his badly drawn beach ball head yuri tranny coomshit.

[Anonymous No.6413911]

Tradcucks are more annoying than AI shills.

[Anonymous No.6413921]

>>6413851
I literally don't have to make threads anymore. I just have to convince everyone that OP is a /g/ shitposter sliding /ic/ and source it back to a falseflag post on /g/. So far its worked out, since these threads tend to repeat themselves. If anything I'm getting AI threads cleaned up.

[Anonymous No.6413928]

>>6413911
crab hands typed this post, learn to draw faggot

[Anonymous No.6413939]

>>6413359
no, AI can draw animated art now. it's over

[Anonymous No.6414004]

>>6413361
That's not even all that impressive. Check this out.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CBZbf6cBqRg

[Anonymous No.6414015]

>>6414004
this is img2img isn't it?

[Anonymous No.6414034]

>>6413359
We have years (my estimation around 10) before AI even gets close to attempting Disney tier 2d animation.
I have not seen any AI animation that has impressed me or had me worried about my future.
The AI would have to keep track of stuff like tails, loose clothing, hair etc. along side the body which would be tough. The AI would have to be trained to know the 12 princibles of animation and how to properly impliment them. Also I've seen AI's have trouble with smears and basic shit like arcs. And inbetweens done by machines also are very evenly spaced which comes off as unnatural and stiff when compared hand drawn inbetweens.

If you are really worried then yeah, go for stop motion. That type of animation will only ever be able to be done by hand.

Just stop worrying about AI. Draw and animate because you want to. Even if AI somehow manages to take over all art related industries there will still be people like me who draw because they love it.

[Anonymous No.6414053]

why arent ai creators automating shit that would actually benefit people instead of going after creative works? i swear this shit has to be a conspiracy to force us all to work for Amazon and live in pods

[Anonymous No.6414061]

>>6414053
>capitalists seek what is best in terms of making money, not in terms of social benefit
WOW THAT IS SO CRAZY
Making you live in the pods is built into the cake, if it is most profitable for companies. Why would they care about anything else?

[Anonymous No.6414062]

>>6413359
That’s a future I can live with.

[Anonymous No.6414097]

>>6414053
>going after creative works
the tech is out there and is being applied to any all areas, you just thought you were special and immune, turns out it was a lie

[Anonymous No.6414116]

>>6414015
I feel IMG2IMG could actually help turning 3D anime models into 2D making it easier for animators to be painting the inconsistencies frame by frame.

a shit? yeah, but still a lot of manual animation and hard work involved.

[Anonymous No.6414124]

>>6414097
Why didn't you use an ai created reaction image instead?

[Anonymous No.6414127]

>>6414124
I don't have any

[Anonymous No.6414132]

>>6414124
he uses ai to make cp, not to waste it on board shit

[Anonymous No.6414136]

>>6414127
Why not?

[Anonymous No.6414137]

>>6414053
to be fair it benefits a lot of people, far more than artists who are a rather specialized niche, of course these people will just use it to make waifu garbage, but I guess that's also what a lot of artists draw too these days

[Anonymous No.6414139]

>>6414136
>because it's soulless.

[Anonymous No.6414147]

>>6414136
Because you can't monetize it.
Some anons are making good money on pixiv making cp for japs, if he's a 4chin doing ai, he's likely a pedo too.

[Anonymous No.6414197]

>>6414124
nta, but I made some laughing elves with SD ~month ago, I used them on /g/ for a time, it's ok

[Anonymous No.6414200]

https://youtu.be/3K25VPdbAjU

[Anonymous No.6414226]

>>6414200
demonic video
>maybe it'll like kill all of us or something lol let's just see what happens kek
what the fuck?

[Anonymous No.6414272]

>anons unironically thinking AIshit will somehow get to animation at some point
>not even realizing automation has been in the fucking animation pipeline for the past 22 years

literally if anyone here had any moderate 2d/3d anim experience would realize this. Anything with a rig has some sort of autotween and 90% of the time it's still shit even when given a strict amount of parameters from both the artist and program itself without major tweaking

>inb4 AIgen animation would be like 2000% better!!!!

[Anonymous No.6414293]

>>6413361
I don't get it

[Anonymous No.6414297]

>>6413827
Most posts are borderline copypaste. It's especially bizarre to see the "fuck artists lol" posts on /co, where they worship even the C-list drawfags and almost invariably have every thread devolve into jerking off over cartoon characters or gossiping about creators.

[Anonymous No.6414310]

>>6414297
/co/ is nothing but pedos and furries no one should care about them

[Anonymous No.6414356]

>another AI thread filled with shillbots

[Anonymous No.6414361]

You can tell this is an AI drone thread because everybody who knows basic shit about animation tech is aware that the best AI animation tech has been available to Pixar and ILM since the 80s and they still never use it because it always turns out like garbage. Also, yet again AIfags prove they're retards who think art subjects are just 2 things. They think character illustrations is just people standing or sitting, and they think character animation is just walking or turning.

[Anonymous No.6414373]

Is AI frame interpolation something reliable as of right now?

[Anonymous No.6414387]

I never thought China of all countries would take the first step in regulating image generation. Of course for self serving purposes but it is what it is.
Exciting times.

[Anonymous No.6414395]

>>6414387
America is too cucked and has been for decades

[Anonymous No.6414402]

>>6414373
no

[Anonymous No.6414423]

>>6414395
>>6414387
chink actually care about their ppl (at least controlling them)
those who control the US just wants to burn it all down

[Anonymous No.6414427]

So far the only thing I'm convinced of AI replacing is the standard /ic/ shitposts that used to make up 90% of the catalog for the past year or so. All of those retarded threads made by anons who don't even draw about things like construction being a meme, Asian jeans, and Ruan Jia crabbing disappeared literally overnight only to be replaced by pajeet Shadman coming to take over your furry commissions.

Makes you think.

[Anonymous No.6414482]

>>6414387
Yesterday I thought this was based but today I just realized AI could pose a threat to the CCP. So it makes sense to ban it.

[Anonymous No.6414549]

>>6414116
What we need is an AI that can generate clean and on model inbetweens that will save us time and effort. Also it would also be great if it can clean up without any issues.

[Anonymous No.6414553]

>>6414004
Holy fuck, this should be illegal.

[Anonymous No.6414556]

>>6414553
lol, why
it's an ai paint over of MMD dance referenced from kpop
are you high again gramps?

[Anonymous No.6414613]

>>6413359
My buddy sent me this the other day.
AI can easily make art in the stop motion style, in fact its a really fun thing to add to prompts (claymation, stop-motion, etc.)

[Anonymous No.6414796]

can you even tell an AI to generate an animation in certain size, frames, timing and consistency?

but if you're that fucking paranoid, just go the game dev route. these guys are a fucking monster though and requires crazy work ethic because you're expected to be knowledgeable and at least decent of every single 2D art shenanigans while having a basic idea on how to code, 3D and whatnot.

[Anonymous No.6414802]

>>6414387
if you look at all the chinkware AI apps, they can detect most Xi images and refuse to make a waifu version of him.

[Anonymous No.6414836]

>>6414387
>In recent years, deep synthesis technology has developed rapidly. While serving user needs and improving user experience, it has also been used by some unscrupulous people to produce, copy, publish, and disseminate illegal and harmful information, to slander and belittle others' reputation and honor, and to counterfeit others' identities. Committing fraud, etc., affects the order of communication and social order, damages the legitimate rights and interests of the people, and endangers national security and social stability.

>The introduction of the "Regulations" is a need to prevent and resolve security risks, and it is also a need to promote the healthy development of in-depth synthetic services and improve the level of supervision capabilities.

AI Faggots have until Jan 10 2023!! ITS OGRE BOYS

[Anonymous No.6414852]

>>6413359
>Will ai be able to create animations from scratch any time soon?
Meme animations, youtube animations, commercial animations,...? Where things dont have to stay on model and janky shit is tolerated? Yeah sure
Good animation, as in Ghibli, old Pixar/Disney quality? Never.

[Anonymous No.6414856]

>>6414852
Hes talking about in the future, like 2 or 5 years. Not current tech

[Anonymous No.6414860]

>>6414856
What part of "humans are lazy" do you guys not understand?

[Anonymous No.6414865]

>>6414852
The way things are going politically, probably not. I can see websites bending the knee for China over >>6414387 alone.

[Anonymous No.6414869]

>>6413379
You mean like how sculpting is completely dead now that 3d printing exists?

[Anonymous No.6414871]

>>6414856
Yes. Machine learning getting portraits right is one thing, but it can't actually understand anything that goes into good animation, even the very basics: tempo, forms being deformed by action, skipping or adding frames,...
Simple object movements aside, people are already trying to use AI in animation to generate inbetween frames to increase the FPS count and it fails miserably at it. All it can manage to do is ruin good actions. Or generate blurry diarrhea like this >>6414004 by overlaying pics over frames of already existing animation.
That's why I think that maybe we'll see AI made globohomo corpo animations sometime, because its very simplistic and little more than slideshows. More than that with the current machine learning tech? No.

[Anonymous No.6414984]

>>6414871
>it can't actually understand anything
Could have stopped here.

[Anonymous No.6415373]

>>6414836
>in china

[Anonymous No.6415466]

>>6413389
We were raised by the wasteland and still found happiness. Ruin will return and ruin will also one day fade.

[Anonymous No.6415766]

>>6413359
lmao

[Anonymous No.6415871]

>>6414061
>if it is most profitable for companies
which is why capitalists will never want you in a pod. houses are a capitalist dream with all the extra upselling potential and the demand they generate for furnishings and maintenance, not to mention the space for other goods.
pods are pure commies bullshit, the final form of state issued housing.

[Anonymous No.6415980]

>>6413571
I think a large part of why it seems super shitty it is it's mainly flooded with shitty techbro and coomer prompts. I've seen some good stuff in a variety of styles

[Anonymous No.6415986]

>>6413823
What? Animation is one of the most likely industries to be AI driven, it's extremely repetitive and draining work that is largely based off just keyframes. Hell interpolation is already similar even though it looks weird. I imagine the day where an AI can interpolate and look normal between keyframes isn't too far away. It's unironically the best usecase for AI in the art field aside from concept art.

[Anonymous No.6415997]

>>6415986
>Animation is one of the most likely industries to be AI driven
No it's not you know nothing retard.

[Anonymous No.6416011]

>>6415997
good counter argument, animation has always been heavily tech driven and regularly takes shortcuts when they can. Why do you think everything is done digitally now? Why do you think studios use 3d models and cgi for environments and complex machinery? Scenes are already dictated almost entirely by the keyframe animator. An AI that could replace the repetitive tweening would be a godsend and allow animation to have more impressive scenes by allowing animators to actually spend time on the overall picture instead of doing repetitive work.

[Anonymous No.6416017]

>>6416011
>An AI that could replace the repetitive tweening would be a godsend
Already exists and already looks fucking horrendous.

[Anonymous No.6416042]

>>6416011
>An AI that could replace the repetitive tweening would be a godsend and allow animation to have more impressive scenes by allowing animators to actually spend time on the overall picture instead of doing repetitive work
In an ideal world, sure. In goyslop world they'll make the same bad looking shit with far less people.

[Anonymous No.6416155]

>another AIfag thread that thinks putting deformed anime faces on existing videos equates to animation
AIfags continue to prove they are mentally handicapped loons who have no idea how ANY technical process works.

[Anonymous No.6416316]

>>6414061
but surely there's gotta be more profitable applications to ai than trying to replace artists which its incredibly shit at (ask any ai to draw hands well lmao)

[Anonymous No.6416339]

>>6416316
>technology doesn't improve
Lol

[Anonymous No.6416345]

>>6416339
Why would you want it to "improve", though? The fucked up hands and shit are the only things that make it interesting

[Anonymous No.6416599]

>>6415373
>even the country with the most IP theft is banning AI
Not a good look for you pajeets

[Anonymous No.6416797]

>>6416599
>putting a watermark on the art
>banning
Lmao you non-AI artists are getting desperate. Now is not the time for fear. That comes later!

[Anonymous No.6416803]

Animation costs a lot of time from multiple
Kind of insane to think nobody wants to replace it with AI

[Anonymous No.6416853]

>>6416803
Oh its coming

[Anonymous No.6416867]

>>6416853
I'm comimg to
WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

[Anonymous No.6416890]

>>6416316
Replacing artists is just a secondary consequence. Image diffusion AIs were funded with the intention of deepfake propoganda. Things are going to get so bad that art will be the last thing on our minds.

[Anonymous No.6416911]

>>6416797
>Now is not the time for fear
That comes now! For (You)!

[Anonymous No.6416938]

>>6416345
Agreed. People who want to actually go anywhere with AI art would benefit from understanding this fact. The real art world doesn't care about pretty pictures and good anatomy regardless of if an AI did it or a human put 100 hours into it.

[Anonymous No.6416941]

>>6413359
>Will ai be able to create animations from scratch
No.
Compare the works of Yutaka Nakamura or James Baxter to the average img2img "animation" and you will see why

[Anonymous No.6417014]

>>6416911
>let's ban cars to keep the horseshoe industry around

[Anonymous No.6417018]

>>6417014
Except cars do their job better than horses.

[Anonymous No.6417030]

>>6417018
They didn't when they were first being developed. Do you not grasp that technology improves over time? And it's improving at an increasingly rapid rate. A year ago I could only make comical melty puppies with AI. Today artists are in a schizophrenic panic over the shit you can make in 10 seconds with a decent prompt. A year from now you'll be in a deep depression if you don't accept the future now and adapt

[Anonymous No.6417048]

>>6417030
>Today artists are in a schizophrenic panic over the shit you can make in 10 seconds with a decent prompt. A year from now you'll be in a deep depression if you don't accept the future now and adapt
But according to AI enthusiasts it takes way more than 10 seconds to make good AI art, actually as many or more hours as real art. And "adapt" is just a shitty way of saying "have fun flipping burgers and giving up on your dreams". Unless you think artists should all go for MFAs and switch to performance art and installation, which I doubt you think is real art anyway.

[Anonymous No.6417063]

>>6417048
Thats my whole point. With current AI, you can make something in ten seconds that drives non-AI artists into a schizophrenic meltdown. Spending a few hours will produce results that makes them all but put a gun in their mouths.
By adapt I mean learn how to use AI as a tool instead of burying your head in the sand. If you want to practice art as a career. That or get used to sucking old Jewish cock in the literal sense.
Its not about winning an argument or rubbing it in your face, its about saving the lives of these aspiring artists who are planning for a future that won't be there. I don't want large swathes of the artistic community to commit more suicide than they already do. At the very least make sure your fellow non-AI artists know about and aren't afraid to use resources like suicide hotlines and therapists. A lot of these people might have a lot of potential if they choose to embrace technology instead of going the luddite route and ending up artistic Amish people at best and another statistic at worst

[Anonymous No.6417114]

If your goal of studying anything was to compete with a machine, you have already lost before you even started.
That's not to say I believe you ever were interested in this, I'm convinced you're just shitting up the board like a thousand other retards yearning for any kind of social interaction.

[Anonymous No.6417115]

>>6417063
>By adapt I mean learn how to use AI as a tool instead of burying your head in the sand

Why is this so hard for twitter users to understand

[Anonymous No.6417117]

>>6417115
Because you shitposters don't understand there's no value in using this tech for making art.
You gain absolutely nothing, zero, nada.

[Anonymous No.6417122]

>>6413359
https://makeavideo.studio/
It's over...

[Anonymous No.6417124]

>>6417117
Except cool fuckin art. Thats what I care about, not being a pretentious pseud and getting attention for being the best cross-stitcher lmao

[Anonymous No.6417126]

>>6417115
Because it won't make a difference unless you're a fiverr Indian. No one in a 1st world country will ever be able to have a creative career ever again no matter how fast you can proompt.

[Anonymous No.6417136]

>>6417124
>Except cool fuckin art
>AI
Pick one. Even for inspiration is garbage. Look at actual art, not the garbage the goyslop machine generates, and get real taste.

[Anonymous No.6417145]

>>6417136
I love the stuff that I made just by myself. The best of galleries for midjourney are fucking incredible. Non-AI art seem boring and simple now

[Anonymous No.6417154]

https://youtube.com/watch?v=YxmAQiiHOkA

You've got 2 years at best before AI obsoletes animators.

[Anonymous No.6417156]

>>6417145
It's literally the same as every artstation slop that was fed into the algorithm.

[Anonymous No.6417173]

>>6417156
Not even close. Its leagues better. Try having some intellectual honesty

[Anonymous No.6417182]

>>6413359
Relax. It will only be used for porn and huge titties.

[Anonymous No.6417183]

>>6417145
pyp

[Anonymous No.6417184]

>>6417173
>Try having some intellectual honesty
Lmao the irony.

[Anonymous No.6417221]

>>6417154
So google is just gonna have a multi-billion dollar video AI that creates animation from literally one API
I love "capitalism" :)

[Anonymous No.6417332]

You should try to get into a good engineering undergraduate program
Research which field is most relevant to your country or country that you wish to work in and work hard
There's other fields that are worth studying ofc

[Anonymous No.6417532]

>>6417332
Why? To help Zuckerberg construct the pod city? I think I'm fine.

[Anonymous No.6417541]

>>6417532
You don't want to help build the comfy cities that jews and their black pets will live in while they rule over you?

[Anonymous No.6417673]

>>6417030
>They didn't when they were first being developed
Yes they did.

[Anonymous No.6417706]

>>6417673
No they didn't they were malfunctioning death traps. By all means, dont prepare for the future. Just don't complain when you're out of work and every successful artist uses AI heavily

[Anonymous No.6418070]

>>6414871

Lmao

Get back to me on this in exactly 1 year, delusional drawfag. It's over for you, get a real job bitch

[Anonymous No.6418078]

>>6415997


Skeletons, rigging, modeling, it will all be heavily AI-assisted very shortly (within literally a year or two). Most animators will be as useful as punch card operators.
Buhbye faggot!
I heard Walmart was hiring!

[Anonymous No.6418094]

>>6414387
>ArtStation is owned by Epic Games
>Epic games owned by TenCent
>TenCent not only owns Epic Games but 40% shares in every major Western gaming company
>China bans AI art and acknowledges it as evil
>All the media in the West is owned by China
>China has decided to target useless AI thieves for organ harvesting
>they have until January 10th
This is not the ending I was expecting for the ArtStation drama, but knowing they will be literally ripped apart is very funny.

[Anonymous No.6418098]

>>6418078
ywnbaa

[Anonymous No.6418111]

>>6418094
Unrelated but it's kind of scary how fucking big Tencent is as a company.
>approx. 3.05 trillion HKD
>(392,219,935,000.00 USD)

[Anonymous No.6418118]

>>6418070
Nah, I think I'll go NEET and live off your wagie tax dollars

[Anonymous No.6418127]

https://imagen.research.google/video/
https://makeavideo.studio/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YxmAQiiHOkA

[Anonymous No.6418196]

>>6416938
Yes, but AIjeets will still copy your style, your colours, and partially your ideas, and give them some AI spin on them. If you didn’t know AI can do all kinds of art styles.

[Anonymous No.6418203]

>>6418127
???

[Anonymous No.6418206]

>>6417030
By adopting you mean stopping doing your hobby? Because promoters aren’t going to be the future. AI is already automating your job.

Also the reason cars were adopted over horses was not the cost, or speed. It was because cars don’t shit on streets like horses. Don’t forget this important fact next time you bring up your car analogy.

[Anonymous No.6418301]

Do it for yourself

[Anonymous No.6418314]

>>6418127

[Anonymous No.6418317]

>>6418127
corridor digital would have a field day with this tech

[Anonymous No.6418496]

this is (you) /ic/?
https://www.patreon.com/posts/75837486

[Anonymous No.6418645]

>>6413444
Good dick analogy

[Anonymous No.6418782]

>>6414387
>Survallience state that sends its people to death camps or prison for the smallest of thoughtcrimes (Xi is Pooh, anti-CCP protests, etc) """"""cares""""""" about its people
Artfags real do deserve to be replaced. I'd even extended this punishment to programmers. Both of these camps create some of the most undeserved, grandoise egos known to planet Earth.

[Anonymous No.6418785]

>>6418782
>tfw my only two skills are in art and programming
>both sides hate each other and both are getting automated

[Anonymous No.6418787]

>>6418496
>AI removes watermark
>Continues with business as usual
Feels like conquering injuns at this point

[Anonymous No.6418796]

>>6418127
>youtube vid
Why are computer freaks and science geeks unable to express any genuine joy in their voices. Like anytime they talk of a topic they're "passionate" about it sounds forced and dry as they recite the subject's world salad.

Was Feynmann really the only cool scientist?

[Anonymous No.6418803]

>>6418094
>China is the first country smart enough to see how much of an economic shitfest AI-image generation is
Holy shit I'm moving to china and giving chinese christmas cakes a chance, the propaganda worked

[Anonymous No.6418805]

>>6418785
>ebony smug samus
I never knew i needed something so bad before i got it

[Anonymous No.6420361]

>>6413359
if by studying you mean doing it in your free time as a hobby for free then yes
if by studying you mean pay for school in the hopes to get paid for animation one day then its too late

[Anonymous No.6420413]

>>6413389
Art isn't a real job, now go learn how to be a plumber so you can unclog my toilet you fucking loser

[Anonymous No.6420457]

>>6420413
I'm an engineer student lmao. Of course art isn't a real job, it's not even a real career path. Art is something you do out of a need to express.
>>6415466
Dafuk?

[Anonymous No.6420473]

>>6417063
Based adaptoor, going to spend time developing my style and make the AI pump heaps of generic poses and scenes out for me to paint over.

[Anonymous No.6420475]

>>6415766
She had a seizure and changed artstyles 5 times in one segment of this.

[Anonymous No.6420573]

>>6414053
Most people just want content to consume and AI will allow it be delivered to them in more abundance than ever before. This stuff greatly benefits the 99.9% of humanity that doesn't give a shit about "muh art".

[Anonymous No.6420580]

>>6417063
I just like to draw. I don't wanna proompt. If being if art as a job is reduced to typing prompts and fixing whatever the AI shits out then maybe those jobs just aren't worth it anymore.

[Anonymous No.6420940]

>>6420573
you already had more content to consoom than you could fit in your life, retard. You're literally the consoomer meme personified

[Anonymous No.6420948]

>>6420457
Everything you consoom had the hands of career artists in it retard. The movies, the images, the musuc you listen to, the labels enveloping the products you buy, those were made by paid artists

[Anonymous No.6420969]

I would like to see an AI created Dungeon crawler game. If it can produce 3d models on the fly,and make the screenshot look hand drawn, then it could theoretically build a world for you to explore. Seamless map generation, randomized personality and agendas for NPCs,story paths all over the place. Like you are exploring ruins and see pic related when you turn the corner. Everyone's playthroughs entirely unique. Can this be done now?

[Anonymous No.6421916]

>>6420969
character.ai has some that do that. but they are using like, 5 steps or something, to spit the image out as fast as possible, looks pretty basic. someone could rig up a good* one right now.

*image gatcha gods willing.

[Anonymous No.6421936]

Just use AI to generate "matte painting" style backgrounds for your animation projects and save yourself a shitload of time. Can also use it for other elements, so you can focus on the character animation. If it has no dialogue you don't even need to pay VAs.

Embrace the shit and leverage it to get your projects done faster and within your meager student budget.

[Anonymous No.6422265]

>>6420940
And now we don't need to you to make content for us

[Anonymous No.6422344]

It could be a fun hobby but I don't think the future job prospects are going to be there.

It could be a fun spectacle, like being able to do a backflip, that could impress some people in a "guy who has a room devoted to a city made from lego" sort of way.

[Anonymous No.6422831]

>>6420948
STEM lords can't fathom art. I know because I took meds that made me into one. Nothing exist except immediate logic. Concepts and feelings are beyond them and only available in individualist sensationalism

[Anonymous No.6422881]

>>6420948
Art is subjective, is it not? Then, for me, those artists working under another person's vision are not making art from my own perspective. Thus, the work from concept artists is not art work, is illustration work made for a greater purpose that could or could not serve the arts.
I'm not gonna dwell a lot into music because this is mainly a drawing-painting board, but even then, the music career is not a real career because...Could you tell me how many who try to make one fail? I mean, yeah, there's a lot of artists out there doing fine music, but do they live off of it? Of course not, you can look at many other musicians 'careers', they always start doing it as a side thing or go into institutes with a very low percent chance of actually living from their own art and only break even because of very rare luck or because they are actual geniuses.
Now, with painting and drawing. I draw, I paint digitally and I can color with trad pencils in what I'd like to think of a mid-tier skill (enough for /ic/ snobs I believe). I can compare both the STEM and the art world and without hesitation I can tell you one requires for your brain to properly function, one requires you to put in all your life effort into learning the thing and has factual objective consequences to your actions.
Have you ever talked to art directors? Like from videogames or movies? The guys are always talking with "I want something more like..." "That makes me feel..." "more obscure, somber" "vivid, splendid", "I want to see what you can do, I want your style, your essence". They are always talking in vague terms and because it's 'art' you can get away with results that are not precise. For example, you can produce a piece of concept and think to yourself "man, this is some piece of shit I just did" but your boss is gonna say "Oh yeah, this is amazing".

Art doesn't require your full brain capacity into it, it doesn't require for you to concentrate, it doesn't expect precise results.

[Anonymous No.6422888]

>>6422881
>and because it's 'art' you can get away with results that are not precise
This is basically why AI was able to perform art before anything else. The actual results don't have to be totally accurate to be "good." But for other fields if something is even a little off it could cause people to actually die. Or at least lose a fuckton of money/resources.

[Anonymous No.6422918]

>>6422881
Perhaps it's just that I feel art isn't hard enough for me to give it 'the place it deserves' in the society hierarchy. I mean, if I sit down for a season and just...draw? I make lots of advancements without even studying or 'practicing'. Perhaps this thing just comes off naturally to me. The 'hard work' artists supposedly put in into their 'art careers' doesn't compare in the slightest to the one from a stemfag. 'Hard work' for an artist means sitting down with a pencil, grabbing a reference book, a guide book or a well lit picture and try to decompose the elements, to 'study' the flow of the subject, to 'interpret' colors. Then, after """da grind""" their artwork receives a buff.
Honestly, the two things I haven't broken down to it's core is appealing and balanced coloring and composition, and curiously enough, I don't even have to go too deep into the later because is not a precise matter, just balance the elements, try to make sense of the spacing, whatever, get a vague sense for the feeling you want to portray. The former though, if you want some nice tones you got to do your optics homework, as basic as it is for art. I'll play guilty and say that I put more effort into the values rather than the tones, not having a precise palette has affected my quality and that's because I don't sit down and place core tones in the digital canvas to grab from.

>>6422831
Believe me anon, I know how a stemlord's brain operates, and mine isn't one of them. I think I have the 'muh artist' brain, but I'm a pragmatic person, got the best grades on math from elementary to high school and so I decided to play it safe with engineering.

[Anonymous No.6422999]

>>6422918
>art isn't hard enough for me to give it 'the place it deserves' in the society hierarchy
Becoming an artist as your main profession always puts you at least 1 economic class lower than you were born into. That's why so many artists are terrible with money, they're used to a lifestyle that they cannot afford.
The stress of that also means if they accept the downgrade they have to also accept a lower social status which is why a lot neck themselves.

Art doesn't actually have a high place in social hierarchy. Middle class white collar workers see artists as "quirky and somewhat similar but beneath them." Lower class white collar and blue collar workers of all types see us as deadbeats who don't have "a real job".

The coomer market is the only place where artists are generally respected.

[Anonymous No.6423548]

>>6422918
>I mean, if I sit down for a season and just...draw? I make lots of advancements without even studying or 'practicing'.
Huge difference between saying it and doing it
Just making that claim shows how much of a disconnect there is between you and people who actually draw

[Anonymous No.6423892]

>>6422918
pyw

[Anonymous No.6424387]

>>6423548
I'm not talking out of my ass.
>>6423892
One year of difference between these two pictures, an actual time of 3 to 4 months of actual work, more or less the vacation period I get from university.

[Anonymous No.6424389]

>>6424387
And I got more if you are not satisfied.

[Anonymous No.6424391]

>>6424389

[Anonymous No.6424396]

>>6424391
Look at my """"study"""" guys, I'm putting all the effort in.

[Anonymous No.6424432]

>>6422831
>STEM lords can't fathom art.
>Nothing exist except immediate logic.
Oh yeah? Here's the logic you fucking nigger

You worried about AI? Guess what P means in GPT (and yes this is the real name of this so called "AI") spoiler: its PRE-TRAINED you dumbfuck, no training data no glorified AI bc its not an AI to begin with, are you still afraid of it? Lets think again for one second and not be a fuckwit, AI art is not art since art is made by an artist, when you see some nice natural composition you dont scream OHGH THATS ART OMG MOTHER NATURE IS AN ARTIST well I wouldnt be surprised if your brain damaged enough to actually do it but POINT IS, art is made by an artist and artist defines art, communicates through it puts feelings and intent in the very process of creating it, and you cant replace them

Take a nigger prompter and blow their brains out, then hit enter with their prompt still typed it guess what you'll see, you'll see you made the same fucking pictures as them BECAUSE IT WASNT YOU WHO MADE THEM IT WAS AN AI if you replace an artist and tell the other one to give you a 1 to 1 copy they wont be able to do it even if they try, thats why neither prompters nor so called AI are artists or create art why would you be afraid of that then, oh right its the fear of the unkown innit, have you even got anything up there in your thick fucking skull to grasp the idea of it before shitting out another AI thread screeching AI GON REPLACE MEH NAAAAAAAAAAH *crying nigger gif*

Im going to get banned for this, I hope you're smart enough to realise this is a shitpost although the logic here is still valid

[Anonymous No.6424725]

>>6424389
based ikarichad

[Anonymous No.6424798]

[Anonymous No.6425059]

>>6424432
Prompters are the same as trannies, except instead of LARPing as women, they LARP as artists

[Anonymous No.6425887]

>>6425059
Cant blame any of them though, trannies just normies brainwashed by (((them))), prompters are just normies brainwashed by AI companies, basically by (((them))) too, there truly is no difference

[Anonymous No.6426589]

>>6414004
it's over...

[Anonymous No.6426630]

>>6413361
I have fans on /ic/!!! :) This is txt2img when I first started!

>>6414004
img2img is too easy, I want to prompt my shit! No 3D allowed! Ok, maybe sometimes, I found some techniques to blend some stuff but haven't given it a go. I fell down a rabbit hole of wave functions to make this shit even crazier!

[Anonymous No.6426631]

>>6426630
>forgot webm, drunk again lol

[Anonymous No.6426649]

>>6426631
>human animation will be replaced
>her face changes art styles every frame
>her leather jacket changes styles every frame
>the legal liability of all these being stolen assets very obviously from Pixiv
Why is this shitty animation demoralization/bait thread still up? Mods explain. Every thread like this kills an actual art critique thread. These faggots are already on every board and they don't need to be here.

[Anonymous No.6426657]

>>6426649
>>6426649

Oh! I'll get to specific model training after pose to pose is perfected. Won't be too long. I don't even use hypernetworks, embeddings, or fine-tunes! Figured it would be like a training chute for when the time comes to get super accurate! :) besides, the industry will have artists forcibly use AI to clean up by poop frames so I don't mind.

[Anonymous No.6426658]

>>6426649
unless you have the lifespan of a mayfly you will live to see this technology improve to a point where it can replicate whatever skills an artist has spent years developing.

[Anonymous No.6426672]

> ...technology is developing at such a rapid rate that automation will progress to cybernation, and cybernation probably to technocracy. If the ruling circle remains in power it seems to me that capitalists will continue to develop their technological machinery because they are not interested in the people. Therefore, I expect from them the logic that they have always followed: to make as much money as possible, and pay the people as little as possible - until the people demand more, and finally demand their heads.

>If revolution does not occur almost immediately, and I say almost immediately because technology is making leaps (it made a leap all the way to the moon), and if the ruling circle remains in power the proletarian working class will definitely be on the decline because they will be unemployables and therefore swell the ranks of the lumpens, who are the present unemployables. Every worker is in jeopardy because of the ruling circle, which is why we say that the lumpenproletarians have the potential for revolution, will probably carry out the revolution, and in the near future will be the popular majority. Of course, I would not like to see more of my people unemployed or become unemployables, but being objective, because we're dialectical materialists, we must acknowledge the facts.

>Today's capitalist has developed machinery to such a point that he can hire a group of specialized people called technocrats. In the near future he will certainly do more of this, and the technocrat will be too specialized to be identified as a proletarian.

t. Huey P. Newton (November 18 1970)

Do not make the mistake of thinking this is static technology.

Do not make the assumption that litigation will save you from corporate interest.

[Anonymous No.6426849]

>>6426657
>>6426658
do you think my girl is beautiful?

[Anonymous No.6426862]

>>6426849
only a newfag would think this is disturbing or upsetting.

[Anonymous No.6426876]

>>6426862
didn't ask lmaoooo.

[Anonymous No.6426965]

>>6414272
>Techtard's think they created the wheel again

More at 11

[Anonymous No.6427141]

>>6424387
>>6424389
>>6424391
Neat.

[Anonymous No.6429523]

>>6413359
if it's not well tagged or easily describable ai can only take guesses at making it such as hands guns a whole animation made by ai will have appendages appearing and disappearing morphing and flipping inside out and this will be something simple like making a fist just fucking going from open hand to fist

[Anonymous No.6429714]

>>6427141
Thanks.

[Anonymous No.6429900]

>>6429523
>if it's not well tagged or easily describable ai can only take guesses
>stop excessively tagging your art so AI can't do a good job with it
Holy shit, galaxy brained idea anon

[Anonymous No.6429924]

>>6413723
Fuck man, my carrier is in danger? Better make sure I forward that message to my battleships and ensure my men are at high alert.

[Anonymous No.6430006]

>>6414004
I prefer the one where the cloths change each frame.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=imeYzkUmLG8