What are your thoughts on pro artists who incorporated AI into their worklow?

File: 2.44 MB, 1375x2100, mystery_cover_1_reward_is_live__by_secretstashstudios_dfjws7h.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

Anonymous Sat Dec 10 03:01:10 2022 No.6409138 [Reply] [Original]

What are your thoughts on pro artists who incorporated AI into their worklow?

>>	Anonymous Sat Dec 10 03:02:32 2022 No.6409139 >>6409138 idc

>>	Anonymous Sat Dec 10 03:08:18 2022 No.6409143 >>6409138 They're genericizing their art and contributing to the acceptance of something which will inevitably hurt their business, especially since they themselves have become part of the slop which aims to drown them out.

>>	Anonymous Sat Dec 10 03:08:21 2022 No.6409144 >>6409138 Another SecretStashStudios thread? Is this some marketing ploy?

Anonymous Sat Dec 10 03:11:14 2022 No.6409147

>>6409138
About the same as artists who incorporate photos into their drawings. Don't really care and I'm not really interested in it.

Computer generated art is about the same as computer generated music. If it can manage to sound great then great but it usually can't.

>>	Anonymous Sat Dec 10 03:11:50 2022 No.6409149 >>6409144 do the needful and use the in-built function for that type of behaviour, sir.

Anonymous Sat Dec 10 03:12:32 2022 No.6409150

>>6409144
I had no idea who this was and had to look them up. The cover screams AI, and he's fooling himself if he thinks his touch ups mattered. Once you embrace the AI slopper, just go whole hog. You've already sacrificed your integrity and no matter what touchups you do the end piece will still have that uncanny look.

>>	Anonymous Sat Dec 10 03:16:03 2022 No.6409151 >>6409138 Again this same guy? Is this paid advertisement?

>>	Anonymous Sat Dec 10 03:17:20 2022 No.6409154 >>6409138 I'm gonna have a A.I baby.

Ai posted this Sat Dec 10 03:20:31 2022 No.6409159

I love seeing these older artist pros loose their shit over the fact that AI is exposing a lot of the bullshit in the art industry.

Yo finally have a tool that can give you almost a perfect 4K hodgepodge of an idea and youre seething over it because you realize you can charge a client for the time to price anymore.

These same guys were stealing images with photobashing and didnt give a fuck. But now this solution thats 1000x better is a problem? Just lol
Also artists a pretty stupid. This poses no threat at all. People will always value storytelling and execution over a pretty image. I’d by AI art from james jean because of his ability to storytell. I wouldnt buy the same image from some rando because it means nothing.

>>	Anonymous Sat Dec 10 03:21:36 2022 No.6409161 File: 116 KB, 768x768, 1670627610014374711863760683433.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] What are your thoughts on pro artists incorporating poo into streets?

>>	Anonymous Sat Dec 10 03:34:02 2022 No.6409169 >>6409138 I would immediately dismiss all their future work as entirely AI generated. They would be completely dead to me. I'd be forever second guessing them, so I'd prefer to never see anything created by them again. Tainted meat.

>>	Anonymous Sat Dec 10 03:37:14 2022 No.6409172 >>6409144 Yes and you are clearly in on it. fuck off.

>>	Anonymous Sat Dec 10 03:38:05 2022 No.6409173 File: 156 KB, 768x768, 16706428450461786559828094368381.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Sat Dec 10 03:40:44 2022 No.6409175 >>6409138 People already developed a natural aversion to this goyslop. It's over.

>>	Anonymous Sat Dec 10 03:42:10 2022 No.6409177 >>6409169 This. SecretShartStudios = dead

>>	Anonymous Sat Dec 10 03:49:19 2022 No.6409182 File: 122 KB, 827x1167, F6A2C686-E570-405F-8485-A2B57DE48791.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6409175 It’s not even close to the ideal, that’s why it’s important to keep talking about AI and always show things like this (pic related)

>>	Anonymous Sat Dec 10 03:53:22 2022 No.6409186 >>6409182 I'd have zero qualms about putting a bullet in that "person's" head.

>>	Anonymous Sat Dec 10 04:14:26 2022 No.6409200 >>6409138 > artists putting work and effort into their art Based > pajeets thinking typing big breasts and masterpiece into a text box and then spamming art sites for clout Not based

>>	Anonymous Sat Dec 10 04:27:57 2022 No.6409213 >>6409138 disgusting degenerates, feed them to a wood chipper

>>	Anonymous Sat Dec 10 04:37:09 2022 No.6409220 File: 562 KB, 812x1240, rat01.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6409138 their interiors are garbage >broken goose neck kek

>>	Anonymous Sat Dec 10 04:39:12 2022 No.6409221 >>6409220 Is that the artist who generated the cover in the OP? If whatever you generate is going to be in such a vastly different style from what you actually draw, why would you bother?

>>	Anonymous Sat Dec 10 04:40:19 2022 No.6409223 >>6409138 i guess it's only a matter of time, they're all horribly mistaken however

>>	Anonymous Sat Dec 10 04:42:21 2022 No.6409227 File: 1.88 MB, 1113x1440, Page 1.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6409221 Some of their interior needs that AI upgrade. >hyperextended hips

>>	Anonymous Sat Dec 10 04:44:53 2022 No.6409228 >>6409138 holy shit I incorporated AI in my workflow and I would not do something like this. what the fuck is wrong is always the fucking hands.

>>	Anonymous Sat Dec 10 04:46:22 2022 No.6409230 Stop shilling your shit on here, Ryan. Your interiors are disgusting, implement more AI in your crap.

>>	Anonymous Sat Dec 10 04:46:41 2022 No.6409231 >>6409227 >>6409220 >thinking normal comic artists don't do this shit

Anonymous Sat Dec 10 04:48:07 2022 No.6409233

>>6409227
As far as western coom art goes, that looks more than fine. I prefer cartoonier shit, but I guess it was working for him. But hey, I guess sacrificing whatever originality and style his art had to create some generic anime blobified version was worth saving all that effort it would've taken him to actually draw it from scratch

>>	Anonymous Sat Dec 10 04:50:20 2022 No.6409234 >>6409231 >stating the obvious Your point, weeaboo?

>>	Anonymous Sat Dec 10 04:50:52 2022 No.6409235 >>6409220 >incel, an artlet at that so double the shame, has never seen a woman so they project their broken anatomy onto the characters in the story. >that neck >that stance >that "movement" Too many cases of this.

>>	Anonymous Sat Dec 10 04:51:36 2022 No.6409236 >>6409233 Well, at least we agree that OP sucks.

>>	Anonymous Sat Dec 10 04:52:37 2022 No.6409237 >>6409235 No complaints from me. I'm just the messenger.

>>	Anonymous Sat Dec 10 04:55:51 2022 No.6409242 >>6409138 Another one to get reported and removed from that site.

>>	Anonymous Sat Dec 10 04:57:09 2022 No.6409244 >>6409237 I got complaints, all of them, so you don't have to. Sorry friend, just amazing how slop this all is.

>>	Anonymous Sat Dec 10 04:58:07 2022 No.6409245 >>6409220 >lettering by ryanc >adds word balloon to talking tit in second panel KEK

>>	Anonymous Sat Dec 10 05:00:19 2022 No.6409247 >>6409245 In this particular fetish that is not a surprising turn of events.

>>	Anonymous Sat Dec 10 05:03:52 2022 No.6409249 File: 26 KB, 400x315, 1628725661455.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6409247

>>	Anonymous Sat Dec 10 05:37:57 2022 No.6409257 >>6409138 Who?

>>	Anonymous Sat Dec 10 05:51:06 2022 No.6409267 File: 93 KB, 768x768, 16706267318628618035242526286283.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6409228 >holy shit, I encorporated AI into my workflow

>>	Anonymous Sat Dec 10 06:13:42 2022 No.6409277 >>6409159 But it looks bad and generic.

Anonymous Sat Dec 10 06:26:58 2022 No.6409282

Sellouts will be sellouts. Their prime goal is to make money in their field, and do not have any standards, ethics, or morals standing in their way(unless, of course, it helps them generate more clout/income.) That’s why their art styles are often so similar at the top end - it’s what sells best. It should come at no surprise that those who trace 3D models and photobash backgrounds regularly will use AI to even further remove their hand from working.

Anonymous Sat Dec 10 06:30:42 2022 No.6409287
File: 239 KB, 1024x1625, anime_horizons__cloud_city_by_shin500_dfjgq27-fullview.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

They're obvious trash under any inspection. All the "pro artists" I've seen incorporate it are usually shit tier. I just recently checked out DA and this was a featured on the front page. https://www.deviantart.com/shin500/art/Anime-Horizons-Cloud-City-939685615
It's featured and has a high view count but the favorite ratio is low, and their DA and Artstation galleries show extreme mediocrity. Also, like all AIfags trying to get a leg up, he didn't tag his pic as AI generated despite it obviously being so.

Anonymous Sat Dec 10 06:41:18 2022 No.6409290

>>6409287
If AI conartists love their new "tool" so much they should be openly tagging it as such and not be ashamed. But they know its like tagging it "traced" and wont reel in the compliments. People are so desperate to feel like they're good at something and get attention.

>>	Anonymous Sat Dec 10 06:47:47 2022 No.6409293 >>6409287 Is that pic ai? It looks very good to be it

>>	Anonymous Sat Dec 10 06:51:52 2022 No.6409295 >>6409143 >>6409147 >>6409150 >>6409169 >>6409290 At what point is it AI art or art that was traced over AI work or used as reference or underpinning. I can easily see AI being use to generate backgrounds for example on the fly.

>>	Anonymous Sat Dec 10 06:51:57 2022 No.6409296 File: 662 KB, 1095x616, 1670559843530348.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] im a simple man, i see Al slop on social media i leave bad comment and thumbs down if youtube

>>	Anonymous Sat Dec 10 06:54:07 2022 No.6409297 >>6409295 >Bargaining

>>	Anonymous Sat Dec 10 06:54:16 2022 No.6409298 >>6409293 It's hard to tell, but I bet no only becuase currently AI cannot do Text on its own without another model done trad in post >>6409295 Forgot add the artist cope is insane.

>>	Anonymous Sat Dec 10 06:54:27 2022 No.6409299 >>6409295 Backgrounds are often my favorite part of a piece. It's sad that so many people don't want to put effort into them and only care about drawing animu characters.

Anonymous Sat Dec 10 06:55:00 2022 No.6409300
File: 530 KB, 837x1433, real artists btw.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>6409182
>look at comments
>see this gem
>I'm a real artist BTW, but I use AI for good purposes
>you know, actually real artists are the plagiarists
>check their profile
>literally nothing art related until AI image generation
Why do they lie like this? It's always so transparent.

>>	Anonymous Sat Dec 10 06:56:51 2022 No.6409302 File: 110 KB, 768x768, 16706536657481043465895443569779.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6409300 >other artists copy and steal, which is bad, but it's ok when I do it

>>	Anonymous Sat Dec 10 07:18:52 2022 No.6409313 https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/unstablediffusion/unstable-diffusion-unrestricted-ai-art-powered-by-the-crowd More monetization of AI art. They're adding back all the artists that were taken out.

>>	Anonymous Sat Dec 10 07:19:59 2022 No.6409314 >>6409300 I love how they compare fake iPhones to AI art. Kek. Deep inside they know they are just a fraud fishing for compliments.

Anonymous Sat Dec 10 07:22:53 2022 No.6409317

>>6409313
>(yes, Greg Rutkowski will be back in your prompts)
Is there anybody involved in this who isn't an abject piece of shit? Seriously, I've yet to see one AI artist who isn't a pompous douche whose primary interest seems to be rubbing his new toy in the face of artists

Anonymous Sat Dec 10 07:29:22 2022 No.6409321

>>6409313
>With $25,000 in funding, we can afford to train the new model with 75 million high quality images consisting of ~25 million anime and cosplay images, ~25 million artistic images from Artstation/DeviantArt/Behance, and ~25 million photographic pictures.
Wipe your galleries now

>>	Anonymous Sat Dec 10 07:30:19 2022 No.6409322 AI shitters speak badly about artists but still use them to develop new models/embeddings/hypernetworks and use their names in prompts. it's like a parasite.

>>	Anonymous Sat Dec 10 07:37:04 2022 No.6409326 >>6409321 Torn between wiping my gallery and leaving it as proof if my shit gets swiped. Not that I had a lot on there. I was always bad about updating my socials and now I am grateful for that.

>>	Anonymous Sat Dec 10 07:41:04 2022 No.6409329 >>6409326 Probably best to just wipe it, especially if you still have the original work files or physical pieces. Screencap it if you wish.

Anonymous Sat Dec 10 07:44:11 2022 No.6409336

>>6409313
>Ethical concerns: AI technology raises a number of ethical concerns, and the project may need to address these issues in order to gain the trust and support of the broader community. We are committed to ethical usage of the technology and have some of the strictest rules regarding deepfakes and other illegal use cases. We will be discussing with ethicists in the field to see how we can better address these concerns, while staying true to our mission of expressive and creative freedom.
They refuse to mention anything about trying to fuck over artists.
>Join us in our mission and let's double down on our attitude of pushing the boundaries of what is possible.
>double down on our attitude
They know you know exactly what they mean

Anonymous Sat Dec 10 07:49:54 2022 No.6409340
File: 58 KB, 769x935, unknown.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>6409138

AI art will be the new paradigm that turns the mainstream art scene from extreme left wing to a more conservative golden age, and I am extremely thankful for it.
Many people are going to realize how vile and inhuman leftie-tech fetishists genuinely are, which are the same people promoting the usual liberal suspects.

The pendulum swings.

>>	Anonymous Sat Dec 10 07:51:01 2022 No.6409341 >>6409329 Good idea. It's bad enough that AI will rape our job prospects and now it's killed the online community too. What is left for us other than dragging down AI conartists with us.

>>	Anonymous Sat Dec 10 07:52:27 2022 No.6409343 >>6409341 Childish as fuck

>>	Anonymous Sat Dec 10 07:53:34 2022 No.6409347 >>6409340 You won't be thankful when you're homeless because of AI/robotics and your republican overlords tell you it's your fault.

>>	Anonymous Sat Dec 10 07:53:35 2022 No.6409348 >>6409343 >j-just shut up and take it!

>>	Anonymous Sat Dec 10 07:54:57 2022 No.6409349 >>6409343 Deal with it Rajeesh. It's called karma.

>>	Anonymous Sat Dec 10 07:58:53 2022 No.6409352 >>6409347 I disagree, kek. By the way, you'll never be a real artist

>>	Anonymous Sat Dec 10 08:01:14 2022 No.6409354 >>6409293 >It looks very good to be it I hope this post is sarcasm. Every object and body part is blurry and randomly disconnected or deformed.

>>	Anonymous Sat Dec 10 08:03:36 2022 No.6409355 >>6409348 >can't compete >chimpouts and opts for the slander/defamation route You're not fit for the modern world. Learn to accept that your time is over and move on

>>	Anonymous Sat Dec 10 08:04:17 2022 No.6409356 >>6409352 AI will never make you a woman

>>	Anonymous Sat Dec 10 08:07:28 2022 No.6409360 >>6409355 >nooo leave your art on the internet, we must use it to train our models, if you don't that's uhhh slander! ???

>>	Anonymous Sat Dec 10 08:10:30 2022 No.6409364 >>6409356 I hope so, kek

Anonymous Sat Dec 10 08:41:08 2022 No.6409398

>>6409290
>>6409300
I've noticed the same thing too. I looked through those threads and found this.
https://www.reddit.com/r/StableDiffusion/comments/zfsu8o/the_first_custom_ai_model_trained_on/
>guy claiming to be a traditional artist says that artists should be embracing AI
>claims that he trained the AI on his own art
>prompts shows he's lying and is imputing names like Dore, Lyendecker, Beksinski, etc.

>>	Anonymous Sat Dec 10 08:44:56 2022 No.6409403 File: 30 KB, 875x423, SIRS pls donate.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6409313 >>6409313 It's unironically a poopjeet begging for money

>>	Anonymous Sat Dec 10 08:49:49 2022 No.6409405 File: 179 KB, 972x1727, Dis nigga in community College lel.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6409403 >he's in community college lol

Anonymous Sat Dec 10 08:58:51 2022 No.6409410
File: 19 KB, 576x432, 27 - Hercules And The Dream Date - Геркулес и Девушка Мечты.avi_snapshot_05.27_[2016.08.27_05.32.42].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

This is basically a thread where we post crazy ai fags claiming to be professionals we've come accross, huh?
https://nitter.it/ClaireSilver12/status/1600538570430640128
https://nitter.it/ClaireSilver12/status/1600561380297351169#m
>went to that pretentious Miami Basil event
>claims to be making enough rent off of selling AI pieces for a Miami beach house
>has an NFT profile and buys NFTs
>religious transhumanist
For those last 2 things, it's unsettling how the most adamant ai promoters consistently end up being spiritual religious transhumanist NFTfags.

>>	Anonymous Sat Dec 10 09:00:45 2022 No.6409414 >>6409405 >Arman Chaudhry AAAAAAAAAAAAH, SER PLEASE DO NOT REEEDEEEM

>>	Anonymous Sat Dec 10 09:00:54 2022 No.6409415 >>6409313 >deepfakes and porn bad >art theft good Ok so they are in fact not autistic, just evil and resentful.

>>	Anonymous Sat Dec 10 09:09:16 2022 No.6409419 File: 80 KB, 1280x640, s.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6409410 >https://nitter.it/ClaireSilver12/status/1600538570430640128 This nigga thinks he's respecting his dead grandma with a horrific piece of art generated by a tranny(?)

>>	Anonymous Sat Dec 10 09:10:59 2022 No.6409420 >>6409410 >https://nitter.it/LinusCaldwell5/status/1599987831035895809 This nigga thinks he's respecting his dead grandma with a horrific piece of art generated by a tranny(?) (fixed link)

Anonymous Sat Dec 10 09:14:56 2022 No.6409426
File: 651 KB, 1093x621, Untitled.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>6409410
>#AIartsociety tag
>a bunch of profiles posting of nft titty pinups while calling others "neo-luddites"
These people actually think they're part of a revolution or something.

>>	Anonymous Sat Dec 10 09:17:48 2022 No.6409430 >>6409426 >patreon I thought this was supposed to democratize art and stop people from making money off art? What happened AIsisters?

>>	Anonymous Sat Dec 10 09:19:30 2022 No.6409432 File: 71 KB, 417x376, 1658376980955999.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6409426 >AI bro is complaining about how one of their pals had their AI pic drawn over by an amateur artist https://nitter.it/Kw0337/status/1594106576008364032

>>	Anonymous Sat Dec 10 09:25:33 2022 No.6409439 File: 427 KB, 593x531, lol its a butterfly i guess.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6409420 kek

Anonymous Sat Dec 10 09:30:02 2022 No.6409442
File: 1.56 MB, 891x2331, screenshot-nitter.it-2022-12-10-04-23-56-907.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>6409432
Found this on there.

>>6409300
Fucking hell, it's always the same shit.
>As a fellow artist...
>As an artist myself...
>As someone who also draws...
They always say this and yet they don't post any illustrations on their profiles or social media. Just generated images.

Anonymous Sat Dec 10 09:41:52 2022 No.6409448

>>6409326
I’ve been posting cropped screenshots and watermarking everything. Normal images are only posted on private discords or patreon.
I used to dislike putting art behind a paywall but if ai niggers are going to steal it otherwise I don’t see an alternative.

>>	Anonymous Sat Dec 10 09:48:04 2022 No.6409455 >>6409448 I'm pretty much going to route of only sharing with other artist friends or commissioners.

>>	Anonymous Sat Dec 10 10:24:02 2022 No.6409473 File: 290 KB, 1400x1632, told.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6409448 >stole It's for your remedial lesson if you're going to win your lolsuit

>>	Anonymous Sat Dec 10 10:27:38 2022 No.6409475 >>6409473 oh wow code ni/g/ger is here. How your coding job goin.

>>	Anonymous Sat Dec 10 10:30:43 2022 No.6409476 >>6409473 And tracing is a "shadow" of the art that was traced, and yet it is still art theft. Get fucked, wagie.

Anonymous Sat Dec 10 10:34:22 2022 No.6409478

Is there anything posted anywhere in the non-AI art community that isn't just cope and seethe?

I'm not even trying to bait here, like what's the plan? Just praying that the speed of litigation will be faster than the speed of AI progress?

Because that seems like turbo-cope.

And it's not like visual artists have record labels that can slap these devs with their money schlong.

Again, honestly not trying to bait but isn't it just over? AI is gonna look as good or better and is infinitely cheaper. What hope is even left?

>>	Anonymous Sat Dec 10 10:40:15 2022 No.6409481 File: 325 KB, 1416x1082, FjgDJ5nXoAEpi4L.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] is this the thread?

>>	Anonymous Sat Dec 10 10:45:32 2022 No.6409487 >>6409478 To stop posting free art to be fed to their goysloppers. >inb4 but how will you make money I'm not a wagie like the average AIshitter. Imagine having to work for money.

>>	Anonymous Sat Dec 10 10:48:17 2022 No.6409488 >>6409487 it's am idea but not a workable one, most everyone draws for social media now

>>	Anonymous Sat Dec 10 10:50:10 2022 No.6409490 File: 3.90 MB, 1408x2048, 1383183788.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6409138 Smart, why wouldn't you do it for commercial art?

>>	Anonymous Sat Dec 10 10:50:27 2022 No.6409491 >>6409473 If you want images to feed into your data sets you can always commission some. I’ll even give you a the discounted price of 10k usd per sketch. Sorry I don’t know the conversion rate for rupees ;)

>>	Anonymous Sat Dec 10 10:52:37 2022 No.6409492 >>6409473 >its just links bro then remove them >nah lmao its permanently trained so suing for permanent damages it is then whats there not to get Raj?

>>	Anonymous Sat Dec 10 10:55:34 2022 No.6409495 >>6409478 >honestly not trying to bait but isn't it just over? You suck as false flagging, pajeet.

Anonymous Sat Dec 10 10:56:54 2022 No.6409496

>>6409487
>To stop posting free art to be fed to their goysloppers.

so basically never share your art again and only draw to look at it yourself or print it out to show your friends?

also break their phone in half every time they take a picture of it i guess.

>>	Anonymous Sat Dec 10 10:57:32 2022 No.6409497 >>6409492 >>6409491 they put back most of the artists they took out from 2.0 in 2.1 https://www.reddit.com/r/StableDiffusion/comments/zfmvfs/artists_are_back_in_sd_21/ when's the lawsuit?

>>	Anonymous Sat Dec 10 10:57:50 2022 No.6409500 >>6409481 So it's really a /g/ raid thread

>>	Anonymous Sat Dec 10 10:58:28 2022 No.6409501 >>6409497 >whens the lawsuit nigger there already is one

>>	Anonymous Sat Dec 10 10:59:04 2022 No.6409502 >>6409496 it would be truly based, but unlikely for someone posting on 4chan, I'm sure a bunch of old artist who still paint in oils won't care... digital art was a mistake

Anonymous Sat Dec 10 10:59:29 2022 No.6409503

>>6409473
>What Does Content Scraping Mean?

>Content scraping is an illegal way of stealing original content from a legitimate website and posting the stolen content to another site without the knowledge or permission of the content's owner. Content scrapers often attempt to pass off stolen content as their own, and fail to provide attribution to the content’s owners.
>Content scraping can be accomplished via manual copy and paste, or may use more sophisticated techniques, such as using special software, HTTP programming or HTML or DOM parsers.
>Much of the content that falls prey to scraping is copyrighted material; reposting it without the copyright owner’s permission is a punishable offense.

you really thought you were saying something here

>>	Anonymous Sat Dec 10 10:59:36 2022 No.6409504 >>6409501 where, link?

>>	Anonymous Sat Dec 10 11:00:03 2022 No.6409505 >>6409495 >asking for literally any viable argument >getting called false flagging pajeet damn, if it's that easy now i guess it really must be over

>>	Anonymous Sat Dec 10 11:01:42 2022 No.6409506 >>6409500 >>>/g/90195284 it's from this thread, it's frankly a better one than the 5 or so ai threads that keeps on rotating here created by shills and shitposters

>>	Anonymous Sat Dec 10 11:01:42 2022 No.6409507 >>6409504 >w-wha? L-Link? These are the low iq street shitters that are trying to FUD us with AI spam. So coombrained on spamming that they don't realize whats actually going on

>>	Anonymous Sat Dec 10 11:03:13 2022 No.6409509 File: 40 KB, 454x458, 1667196106823.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6409507 are you for real? seriously

>>	Anonymous Sat Dec 10 11:04:03 2022 No.6409512 >>6409506 /g/ Is more obssessed about artists than /ic/ Is about ai art. Pretty sad honestly

>>	Anonymous Sat Dec 10 11:11:24 2022 No.6409523 File: 46 KB, 640x773, 1657343718659.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6409227 This is AI? It's good enough to fap to

>>	Anonymous Sat Dec 10 11:11:33 2022 No.6409524 >>6409512 it's where it belongs, it's tech, not art

>>	Anonymous Sat Dec 10 11:12:25 2022 No.6409527 >>6409523 no

Advanced search
Text to find
Subject [?]Search by post subject. Leave empty for any.
Username [?]Search for user name. Leave empty for any user name.
Tripcode [?]Search for tripcode. Leave empty for any.
Email [?]Search by email. Leave empty for any.
Filename [?]Search by image filename. Leave empty for any.
From Date [?]Enter what date to start searching from. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
To Date [?]Enter what date to start searching until. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
Image hash
Search in	All Posts OPs Only
Deleted posts	Show all posts Show only deleted posts Only show non-deleted posts
Internal posts	Show all posts Show only internal posts Show only archived posts
Order	New posts first Old posts first
Capcode	All Posts Only by Users Only by Mods Only by Admins Only by Developers
Results	Posts Threads
Action	[ Simple ]

/ic/ - Artwork/Critique