[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

View post   
File: 171 KB, 746x937, 3683891748_1879824a35_b.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6397015 No.6397015 [Reply] [Original]

Where is the border between coom and art?

>> No.6397016

>>6397015
I don’t know stop asking me

>> No.6397022

>sees breasts
>immediately twitches to say his favourite buzzword
tiddies have been venerated for the entire time we've been here dude we just love those big milk bags and have been making tributes to them forever.
if your question is somehow legitimate, how long is a piece of border? that's entirely subjective. you want to spark another pointless debate on here? you do? well have fun, have it, fuck it, what else should we do in this brief tiddy worshipping life

>> No.6397085

>>6397015
“art” was always a scam to bang stupid whores that fall for it

>> No.6397121

>>6397022
>tiddies have been venerated
*tips fedora*

>> No.6397155

when you're asexual it's all just the same

>> No.6397250

>>6397015
Drawings of tiddies and schlongs has been around ever since human has existed

>> No.6398979

>>6397015
sauce?

>> No.6398992

>>6397155
>asexual

A term pushed be people with either non-existent libido, mentally ill women/faggots, or those who have lost all prospects of finding a partner.

>> No.6399001
File: 166 KB, 874x768, crumb big healthy.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6399001

>>6397015
>Where is the border between coom and art?
Robert Crumb

>> No.6399028

>>6398992
>asexual
>A term pushed by people with non-existent libido
I think that's the idea, yeah

>> No.6399171

>>6397015
if the intent is to make something to assist in masturbation its porn
If the intent is exploring human experience and you jackoff to it, then its not porn.
Cranking one out to the sears catalog doesn't doesn't make Sears perverts.

>> No.6399181

>>6399028
he should've said deviants with non-existent libido. deviants.

>> No.6400325

>>6397015
Art is a meaningless and arbitrary term. The term "skilled work" should replace it in pretty much all contexts.

>> No.6400419

>>6397015
There isn't a border. They're just two sides of admiration.
Ideally, one should feel exhilaration whenever they make or enjoy "art." If you don't, you're being too intellectual or pretentious. Even when you admire something "for the craft" you're still being excited, feeling passion for, the hard work and skill that went into something.
Conversely, some porn sparks admiration (leading to arousal) on its own. It's just that too often, people settle for material just because its in front of them instead of seeking porn that actually reaches them, that they wish to engage with.

>> No.6400537
File: 363 KB, 536x531, Screenshots_2022-04-09-16-05-13.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6400537

>>6397015
How big the boobies are

>> No.6402311
File: 351 KB, 579x813, shading_exercise6.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6402311

>>6397015
Border?

>> No.6402670

>>6402311
Very nice, anon.

>> No.6402841

>>6399181
How is it deviant when I’m specifically declaring I don’t like anything deviant?

>> No.6402843

>>6397015
>made by males
coom
>made by women
art
/thread

>> No.6402851 [DELETED] 

>>6402843
it's usually the opposite, most artists earning money are men becuase of this, and most of their work is just nude women to jack off to.
if people know you're female, people usually generally refuse to engage with anything you do, no matter how complex your work is, unless its coom or something.
but with men its more like
>scribbles 3 penises on a white canvas
>"omg, it's le deep existentialism!!! truly a philosopher of our time, cutting political commenta"-
you get the gist.

>> No.6402854

>>6402843
it's usually the opposite, most artists earning money are men because of this, and most of their work is just nude women to jack off to.
if people know you're female, people usually generally refuse to engage with anything you do, no matter how complex your work is, unless its coom or something.
but with men its more like
>scribbles 3 penises on a white canvas
>"omg, it's le deep existentialism!!! truly a philosopher of our time, cutting political commenta"-
you get the gist.

>> No.6402900

>>6402854
PYW femanon, I want to see it.

>> No.6402922
File: 544 KB, 692x898, candlegirl_s.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6402922

>>6402900
>"frogs are generally green"
>"oh yeah?? post YOUR frogs anon!!!"
i don't do fine art, anon. for obvious reasons listed above. my parents do have a few of my paintings (mostly oil) in their bedroom though, but i cannot currently procure them for your viewing pleasure, because i do not live with them. i'll instead attach an illustration i made for fun, if that makes you happy.

still, i can talk about things happening in the sphere of fine art either way, regardless of that, just like you who, has not posted his art at all before demanding mine, if i may remark.

it's almost like you expect to be taken seriously without backing anything up, but i on the other hand need to provide additional material just to have my point considered. not particularly surprising and kind of precisely what i'm talking about. have a good day.

>> No.6402980 [DELETED] 

>>6402900
to add on, i'm not accusing you of being evil or anything, just want to express that it's annoying to always be under a special, additional layer of scrutiny and bias (besides the one that already exists when you present your personal work that is tied to you, a person) and bad faith, but also have to convey your worth to some board of gallery curators, not to mention the amount of sucking up/""building business connections"" you have to do.
and also have your livelihood depend on it, all the time. it's just not worth it...

>> No.6402990

>>6402900
to add on, i'm not accusing you of being evil or anything, just want to express that it's annoying to always be under a special, additional layer of scrutiny and bias (besides the one that already exists when you present your personal work that is personally tied to you, a person) and bad faith, but also have to convey your worth to some board of gallery curators, not to mention the amount of sucking up/""building business connections"" you have to do.
and also have your livelihood depend on it, all the time. it's just not worth it...

...and before you all unsubscribe to my blog, here's my take on op's question:
it obviously lies in the eye of the beholder. "art" and "coom" are not opposites, but rather different facets under which the same thing can be experienced.

>> No.6403058

>>6402922
Very cute, nice work

>> No.6403062

>>6397015
The proportions and level of development. Artist have been drawing attractive women since forever. A lot of the time they use a model and idealize the form but coom artists straight up reject reality and give women fuck huge miraculously perky breasts, narrow waists, hips twice as wide as the shoulders, and an ass that you can see from the front.

>> No.6405502

>>6397015
The same border as coom and tiles.