and nothing of value was lost.

[Anonymous No.6369967]

I don't even give a shit about this, it's not like people have kept using Deviant ever since the UI got redisgned.
I never thought I was ever going to say this but Twitter will remain as the only true art platform. Pixiv, eHentai, most boorus and other sites are filled with spam and I can't recall the last time I haven't seen anything else other than deformed girls with tits in there.

[Anonymous No.6369969]

Twitter is fucking trash, suck my dick Elon.

[Anonymous No.6369975]

>>6369967
Website owners are fucking idiots.
Deviantart was already fucking dying and this pretty much seals the deal.

[Anonymous No.6369976]

>>6369967
>Control the amount of AI art in your feed
So who cares? You can just turn it off it it triggers you that much.

[Anonymous No.6369977]

>>6369967
Why are art platforms and programs in the west embracing AI art when it’s ruining their platforms? Something seems shady about it.

I don’t want to opt in for my art to be woodchipped into “DreamUp”. This will just be more spam on these websites. So many people are complaining on Twitter you can’t even find real artists on pixiv anymore.

[Anonymous No.6369986]

>ratio
kek

[Anonymous No.6369987]

>>6369969
My timeline has never had a single AI artwork ever since I mass blocked every single faggot who follows Emad, NovelAI and StabilityAI.
I can actually filter shit on Twitter, unlike any other website.
>>6369976
DeviantaArt it's going to use every single picture on the platform to create a database for their AI, faggot. Not everyone knows is aware of it.

[Anonymous No.6369988]

>>6369977
You deserved this fate for being such insufferable bitter cunts.

[Anonymous No.6369991]

>>6369977
Because they are clueless idiots trying to make money on the hype wave.
But they don't realize that users quite literally don't want to see even more garbage pile up on art websites. They are completely out of touch.

[Anonymous No.6369993]

>>6369967
Is there some inside joke between CEOs and speedrunning their companies into bankruptcy or something?

[Anonymous No.6370002]

>>6369967
We're literally watching a website kill itself. Maybe even worse than what tumblr did. Holy..

[Anonymous No.6370003]

>>6369967
So a bunch of poorly generated sonic art?

[Anonymous No.6370008]

>>6369967
>Let me just opt out real qui-

[Anonymous No.6370018]

>>6369967
Not going to pretend like I know anything about American law, but isn't this legitimate grounds for a Facebook-tier lawsuit? I know when you sign up for a website, you are beholden to their ToS which you agree to. However, this is something entirely new that you are automatically opted into. Again, you agreed to their ToS, but copyright IS copyright, and you are still the legal owner of your shit unless your sign a legal contract relinquishing your rights.

I feel like this is similar to buying something off a website years ago, and then years later that company automatically signs you up for a monthly subscription service with your card on file. Which the FTC would absolutely love.

[Anonymous No.6370021]

>>6370008
Well time to backup interesting stuff from the website because this is the end.

[Anonymous No.6370027]

>>6370018
Hasn't DA had a clause in their user agreement for a while now that states that everything you post belongs to them? I thought that was the reason for the original exodus from the platform.

[Anonymous No.6370031]

>>6370027
> everything you post belongs to them?
thats literally insane. Even instagram has better morals than that

[Anonymous No.6370033]

>>6370027
I didn't know about this but that still doesn't sound like something that's possible, I've dipped my toes in the screeenwriting biz and there's a fuckton of proper paperwork that goes into selling/relinquishing copyright.

[Anonymous No.6370037]

>>6369988
Fuck off back to your pod spiteful mutant. Stop projecting.

[Anonymous No.6370038]

>>6369987
>DeviantaArt it's going to use every single picture on the platform to create a database for their AI, faggot. Not everyone knows is aware of it.
lmao everyone can Deviant art can't do shit even Instagram can't if they really want rip it
As long as people can see your art (your browser downloads the image) people can take it. the only way now is to not uploading

[Anonymous No.6370039]

>>6370027
>>6370031
Everything you post can be used by them, Instagram and every other social media with a share button is the same

[Anonymous No.6370041]

>>6369975
>>6369977
They are controlled by people that don't care about the artists

[Anonymous No.6370043]

>>6370039
ok but they dont own it. If DA is saying they own your shit thats literally batshit insane

[Anonymous No.6370045]

>>6369975
>>6370027
Not surprise as the stockholders are Jews

[Anonymous No.6370046]

I'd like to laugh at this trainwreck but this is even stupider than Musk killing twitter.
>You have to opt out every image manually
>You can now link NFT to the image
>Content servers are struggling because people are mass deleting stuff
How? I genuinely can't understand.

[Anonymous No.6370048]

>>6370043
Yes, they don't own it

[Anonymous No.6370050]

>>6370038
Fair use is completely different from being the legal copyright owner. This is copyrighted material that is automatically sold and used as if they were the legal owners, which they aren't. Facebook is in hot water with the American government for less, with selling user data.

[Anonymous No.6370051]

>>6370046
>How?
Jews

[Anonymous No.6370053]

>>6370051
Aren't jews supposed to be smart?

[Anonymous No.6370054]

>>6370046
Obviously someone either bought the company or the data. Either way it's extremely shady and the blatant chauvinism of it all is clown world tier.

[Anonymous No.6370060]

>>6370039
What about if I send one of my paintings over snapchat, discord etc? They also get stored on a server. Anyone know if they can scrape them too?
I'm asking because I'm kinda incognito. I don't post on a social platform. I only send consepts and stuff to friends. However they are certainly original work.

This fucking shit has made me too paranoid to even start uploading onto a social platform and build a following.
I had hoped that this abuse of power would be regulated somehow so I've been waiting to see how this would escalate. I feel stuck. What do anons?

On one hand I feel like it would be best to start building a following now before this AI shit completely takes over but on the other hand I don't want my work to get stolen. I don't want to support these scummy megacorporations with my data...

I don't want to stop being a draftsman. It's been my biggest passion for decades.. I'm not the only one in a tough mindspace rn on here. Guess I'm just curious to hear your thoughts about this shit..

[Anonymous No.6370064]

>>6370053
Everything is about monopolize art. AI will be copyrighted and they will forbid you to draw because the style is in their AI database.

[Anonymous No.6370069]

>>6369967
i just feel like hosting my art on a personal website now.
i don't even care if no one ever sees it anymore, i'm happy to create in my little corner of the web.

[Anonymous No.6370070]

>>6370046
you forgot
>you can only opt out if WE FEEL LIKE IT
see
>>6370008

[Anonymous No.6370075]

>>6370008
Time to never post art online ever again

[Anonymous No.6370080]

>>6370046
You mean true illustrators or "artists" are mass deleting stuff? I feel like at least that's a good sign. Actual artists refusing to be a part of this exploitation. Not that I think it would change much considering what we're up against but at least we're fighting back. Like going on a strike.

Also I would have to register every image I upload online for "opt out"?
This is disgusting honestly. We're left to deal with the paperwork after having our lifelong passion ripped apart and raped before our eyes.

I still can't believe they're getting away with this usery.. It's like a fucking nightmare. Like living on a planet full of evil aliens or something.

[Anonymous No.6370083]

>>6369967
Yeah another reason never to go back to this shithole again
Why is opt-out manual and not the default? I don't want any of my pics to end up in a jew art woodchipper. Can people not see what's wrong with this?

[Anonymous No.6370089]

>>6370008
So now that Deviant Art has blown their fucking brains out with a 12 gauge shotgun, and Twitter is finally starting to die, what website is left for us artbros? Maybe Mastodon or Pixiv?

[Anonymous No.6370091]

>>6370080
>You mean true illustrators or "artists" are mass deleting stuff?
Yes a lot of people are deleting their images and accounts right now.
>This is disgusting honestly. We're left to deal with the paperwork after having our lifelong passion ripped apart and raped before our eyes
My only hope is that people will finally realize how valueable their data is and that they need to stop to gift it to companies for fucking free.

[Anonymous No.6370097]

Someone should create a community/ site that protected artists rights from these theft-softwares.
Somewhere that they couldn't just datafarm without repercussions. I don't even know if that's possible but at this point we need a place like that...

[Anonymous No.6370098]

>>6370089
Pixiv is getting anally raped by AIturd spam as we speak and not taking any hard stance against it
Mastodon might do the trick but really normalfags won't bother joining this. Continue posting on Twitter because that's where the normals are at, but branch out and also post in Mastodon and maybe Tumblr and/or Insta.

[Anonymous No.6370103]

>>6370008
I'm deleting every single drawing of mine, every 300 of them by hand, rather than marking them unavailable for 3rd party use, and then deleting my account. Fuck the kikes.

[Anonymous No.6370105]

>>6370097
People can copy and paste anything without repercussions

[Anonymous No.6370108]

>>6370091
I totally agree with you. I mourn alongside with you anon... I only hope we can get back to some kind of normalcy. Where we can have right. Where we can be treated like humans instead of like crops to be farmed.
What they have done to us is something I can never forgive.

[Anonymous No.6370109]

>>6370089
Come home artman

[Anonymous No.6370110]

>>6369986
These answers man, holy shit they're not happy
I am overjoyed that so many artists are standing up against this pathetic shit

[Anonymous No.6370111]

>>6370089
NewGrounds is based and bans AI on sight.

[Anonymous No.6370113]

>>6370110
I remember when Eclipse was getting rolled out it was the same shit; the reception was one hundred percent universally negative. Everyone was telling them not to do it and how they'd kill the site and cause an exodus of users, and they did it anyways. Fucking retards. Expect this shit to be more of the same.
We might have to go back to fucking webrings for hosting art, since no good gallery site exists.

[Anonymous No.6370114]

If you have some time to kill you should poison the well by tagging your beg arts with all the popular or misleading tags
If you're a big dick on twitter tell your followers to do the same too

[Anonymous No.6370116]

>>6370111
Newgrounds is so fucking weird. It's actually amazing to see a website still hold its core userbase for so long without changing much of anything.

[Anonymous No.6370117]

>>6370105
For now right? Things could still change for the better. Maybe if/when the stupid normies wake up.
If people start revolting against these tyranical nerds who dictate our fate as if they're gods.
Maybe I'm just fucking coping..
I just can't let go that easily.. I spent my life on this.

[Anonymous No.6370120]

>>6370110
That's the spirit. Fucking animals is what they are.

[Anonymous No.6370121]

>>6370117
We probably will need some high profile artist suicides for the normies to rise up

[Anonymous No.6370122]

>>6370117
Media piracy for half a century and nothing has been done

[Anonymous No.6370123]

>>6370105
But can you copy and paste and try to profit from the result without repercussion? Because that's exactly what AI techniggers are doing

[Anonymous No.6370127]

Americans normalize pasting this on your artwork from now on

[Anonymous No.6370130]

>>6370116
How is it for actually hosting an art gallery, though? I considered it a few years back when Eclipse was getting rolled out but shit wasn't bad ENOUGH to really justify the switch.

[Anonymous No.6370137]

>>6370121
That would be awful, but I can't deny it would be extremely efficient to stain AI public image.

I still think that laws means nothing in this war against machine worshipers, we need to make people see how disgusting it is, public opnion is way stronger than any law.

[Anonymous No.6370139]

>>6369967
How is this place even still alive? Who's been using it for the past 10 years?

[Anonymous No.6370142]

>>6370139
Me. I hosted a webcomic there and despite how ass the interface is, it's at the very least better than twitter.
This shit is kinda giving me second thoughts about staying there, though.

[Anonymous No.6370143]

>>6370121
I have my doubts they will . Most of them haven't even taken a real stand against this. Seems like they're just happy they got paid and that's it.

If I had an audience like them I'd be furious. They would have to ban me to shut me up...

[Anonymous No.6370146]

>>6370142
I'm looking for a place to host my own comic and honestly for that thing in particular it feels like doing your own website is the only good option
Hope you can find something that works for you bro

[Anonymous No.6370150]

>>6370123
Have you seen fiverrr and their ilk?

[Anonymous No.6370151]

>>6370143
True. They even made AI models from those artists and they still keep quiet. Fucking chickens.

[Anonymous No.6370154]

>>6370146
>for that thing in particular it feels like doing your own website is the only good option
I'm beginning to draw (heh) that conclusion as well. Fancy that, twenty fucking years of internet "progress" and we're back to webrings. Good luck to you too, dude.

[Anonymous No.6370183]

>>6370151
Absolutely spineless. If I were one of them I would feel an obligation.
Big ups to Karla Ortiz, Craig Mullins and Zappata and all the rest for being our voice when we need them the most..

[Anonymous No.6370187]

>>6370183
But they are pro AI, not to mention two of those are men

[Anonymous No.6370195]

>>6370089
I dont know, but whoever manages to make a site against AI data scraping and prioritizes protecting artists work will literally have cornered both the twitter, deviant art, and pixiv user base in one fell swoop.

[Anonymous No.6370198]

>>6370195
That is like saying whoever makes a website that prioritizes real art and not digital art in the 2000s will have an advantage over all other website

[Anonymous No.6370201]

Why's it that every AI shiller is so out of touch and a fucking smug cunt?

[Anonymous No.6370203]

>>6370187
There's not a single reason to be pro AI if you're an artist. Unless you want to quit making art and let the AI generate it for them with their own artstyles.

[Anonymous No.6370206]

>>6370201
>our website is fucking dying live
>should we reassure our users?
>nah, double down

[Anonymous No.6370207]

>>6370110
h o l y

[Anonymous No.6370209]

>>6370198
>no goyim! you shouldn't seek protection from data scraping, you shouldnt try to stop people from stealing your shit! that's so 20th century!

[Anonymous No.6370210]

>>6370198
No Raj, go to bed.

[Anonymous No.6370211]

>>6370187
Oh.. yeah thanks for correcting me.
Anyways I guess we'll just have to see how this turns out.
Maybe we can use this time to develop our own technical abilities. Regardless of what happens I won't let them take my joy of creating from me. Even if it means I'll only draw for myself.
Who knows what happens next in this absurd timeline we live in.

I picked up 3D modelling years ago and am currently working on a game. I also lift heavy weights to get the anger out.

Anyways don't give up anon. Best of luck.
We can channel this same passion into other pursuits.

[Anonymous No.6370216]

>>6370209
>2000s
>20th century
Anon-kun?

[Anonymous No.6370219]

>>6370198
But you need an artist for both digital and traditional art, the skills needed are virtualy the same.

Art resquest >> Artist producing the art >> result


AI generation works like this:

Prompt Request >> generated result

[Anonymous No.6370222]

>>6370219
Art request >> Prompt request >> Artist fixing the art >> Result

[Anonymous No.6370230]

>>6370219
Don't bother trying to engage with them.

[Anonymous No.6370231]

>>6370089
Reddit

[Anonymous No.6370233]

Obligatory digital artists BTFO

[Anonymous No.6370237]

>>6370201
I want to dream up a full body shot of an anatomically correct woman with a background that makes sense

[Anonymous No.6370239]

>>6370231
from what I experienced sharing your shit on r*ddit is a nightmare because of autistic mods enforcing really retarded "no self-promoting" rules

[Anonymous No.6370241]

Just happy this speeds up the incoming Butlerian Jihad

[Anonymous No.6370242]

>>6370222
Again with this dumbass argument.
"fixing the art" takes longer than drawing something good from the beginning.

[Anonymous No.6370243]

>>6370201
That's how they get the younger generation to adopt AI art and normalize it in 20 years from now

[Anonymous No.6370244]

>>6370222
Most of the time you won't need a prompter, you can easily find prompt examples to copy and paste. Also, most AI art spams are direct results. Anyway, it's a disaster either way.

[Anonymous No.6370245]

Now that Elon is going full retard, this will go under the radar

[Anonymous No.6370247]

>>6370244
Pyaiw

[Anonymous No.6370248]

>>6370201
They're also cringe as fuck. and not even in an endearing way like early 2000's humor.

[Anonymous No.6370249]

the ratio kwab

[Anonymous No.6370251]

>>6370113
>since no good gallery site exists.
NewGrounds.

But agreed we must go back to webrings.

[Anonymous No.6370253]

I don't know how this affects /ic/ we don't draw

[Anonymous No.6370257]

>>6370233
Fuck off with this nonsense.
There are so many good digital artists out there - there are no prompt artists out there.
Equally just because you paint on a canvas doesn't automatically make you a good artist.
You can't put all of us in the same category. If you think digital art is cheating just because we have layers and ctrl-z you're an ignorant moron.
A lot of us digital artists also use traditional mediums..
Also If you're an AI-prompter spouting this garbage; your opinion is worthless.

[Anonymous No.6370259]

>>6370039
I knew this was nonsense, you need to sign a legal contract in order to relinquish your copyright.

The only reason shit like this even happens to us in the first place is because artists don't have the money the record companies do to protect their music copyright. At the very least we need to bring this up to our governments because they're unfortunately all we have other than ourselves.

[Anonymous No.6370271]

>>6370259
artists have movie studios, game studios, publishing houses, we just don't have rock star statuses that mainstream musicians have

[Anonymous No.6370276]

>>6369987
>DeviantaArt it's going to use every single picture on the platform to create a database for their AI, faggot.
>every single picture
lmao they are gonna have the worst ai database.

[Anonymous No.6370279]

>>6370271
I don't think that compares to music money.

Another point, musicians and the people who do business with them are notorious assholes and will sue somebody at the drop of a hat. Artists for some reason are sensitive and forgiving and non-confrentational.

[Anonymous No.6370280]

>>6370276
Not to mention that a lot of the old art in particular isn't even tagged at all, beyond a title.

[Anonymous No.6370284]

>>6370060
There's nothing stopping anyone from taking a screenshot of your work and spreading it around
>>6370046
>nfts
>ai
When will this bullshit stop? When will these greedy tech scum back off into their lane?
>>6369967
I have an old ass account with like, 3 pictures on it. The quality isn't the best and I remember being nostalgic for it. I don't mind destroying it because fuck this shit. I hope the higher ups start freaking out at the ratio
>>6370201
>smug
The shills want to talk about how artists are smug but its not even a competition when it comes to tech nuts. They take glee in stealing and seeing people become unemployed on a scale I've never seen before.

[Anonymous No.6370291]

>>6370279
Artists are pathetic and spineless, 98% of them are just waiting for other people to do the problem solving for them or they already have a job and don't have to care right now since they're still getting paid, they'll start caring when they don't.

[Anonymous No.6370292]

>>6370284
>tech nuts
Maybe some, but a lot are just your run of the mill terminally online shitters.

[Anonymous No.6370299]

>>6370276
I'm gonna make an account and post shitty ms paint drawings and tag them as masterpiece, good anatomy, etc

[Anonymous No.6370305]

>>6370299
Reminds me of 4chan writing NIGGERS in the old google captcha.
History repeats itself.

[Anonymous No.6370316]

>>6370291
Most online artists barely make any money from their work, if any, or at least not enough to classify it as a job. Sadly the most sway the average online artist has is to say fuck off and delete their shit. The ones who make online art their career are those who can stand to make a real impact if they choose to do so. Sadly some of them are so money motivated that they'll likely just stay quiet to avoid rocking the boat, because their income streams from their fanbase and stores is going to be secure no matter what.

[Anonymous No.6370318]

>>6370299
Since AI isn't intelligent and simply doesn't understand anything other than following an algorithm to transform copyright images into noise and use the tag system to activate this data whenever the prompt is inserted, I guess it could work, but would need to be literaly thousands of wrongly tagged data.

[Anonymous No.6370319]

>>6370109
even as a furry, i fucking hate furaffinity
awful user interface.

[Anonymous No.6370320]

>>6370299
Good idea, I'll start tagging my stuff with banned words like gore & rekt

[Anonymous No.6370321]

>>6370318
inb4 DeviantArt starts banning people for improperly tagging their work and hires thirdworlders to sift through their garbage dump of a hosting site to tag as many untagged pieces as possible.

[Anonymous No.6370322]

>>6370318
Not the same anon but I have profiles on there from 2006. Back when I first started digital painting. My work was such trash. I'm gona leave it there for the AI. It can have that shit. Considering it a public service.

[Anonymous No.6370323]

>>6370321
DA has no money left. Wix aren't giving it any. It shutdown its print store in November.
https://www.deviantartsupport.com/en/article/sunsetting-the-prints-shop

This is its last desperate chance.

[Anonymous No.6370327]

>>6370323
>This is its last desperate chance.
Then it looks like they're fucked, and it's their own fault. It's like if you load all six cylinders before playing Russian Roulette

[Anonymous No.6370329]

>>6370291
I'm full schizo and now painfully redpilled on this bullshit. I'm continuing my study grind even harder now to be a godtier artist just to tell every inferior artist without a spine to go fuck themselves.

[Anonymous No.6370330]

fucking hell
Another bit of the old internet done for, fuck this shit

[Anonymous No.6370332]

/g/ user here, you guys have to realize this is the best you are going to get: for AI art to be labeled and for the ability to opt out. It's over.
The alternative is that stable diffusion users keep training on your copyrighted work without your permission and upload it untagged.
Being mad at deviantart is retarded. Do you not know how to host images on your own website?

[Anonymous No.6370335]

>>6370332
>Being mad at deviantart is retarded. Do you not know how to host images on your own website?
As much as I wanna argue with you, you're pretty right about that. Go fucking look up some HTML tutorials, /ic/

[Anonymous No.6370339]

What makes me laugh is seeing /ic/ seething to ai on a daily basis

[Anonymous No.6370341]

>>6370332
opt out should be the default but that would leave them without any data to train the AI with. It's extremely scummy even if they give you the option.

[Anonymous No.6370343]

>>6370329
That makes me mad too, fucking cucks getting fucked in the ass and still want to keep those "superior progressist posture", like "it's all fine, it's just a new tool, it won't take our jobs, if not, will create even more opportunities to artists!". That last one is basically the stance a guy called Naoki Saito is maintaining about AI. It'll be fun when AI will also start making YT videos and his channel also gets ignored

[Anonymous No.6370344]

>>6370332
yeah but deviantArt has no moderation and retarded management. AI generated images and actual art can coexist if the rules are enforced, but that doesn't happen on deviantArt. It's best this place dies a fiery death to provide an example to other art communities.

[Anonymous No.6370347]

>>6370339
Maybe get a life then. Or end your current one. Nobody will miss you anyway you spiteful little shit.

[Anonymous No.6370350]

>>6370347
Our life is a comedy, smile more anon

[Anonymous No.6370351]

>>6370332
I hope copiloting tuns into full auto pilot like they did with art. Keeping your own codes out of the internet will be the best you'll be able to do too.

AI will become a bad thing for everyone but mega corporations eventually.

[Anonymous No.6370352]

>>6370253
only good post in this thread

[Anonymous No.6370355]

>>6370350
Maybe you're right. Maybe one day I'll see the humor in it. Anyways. Sorry.

[Anonymous No.6370357]

>>6370335
I would advise moving to a physical medium like sculpting/painting (no AI art robots yet), interactive art, making video-games/demoscenes (there are a few mathematically-hard problems in programming which still remain unsolved by AI), and copy-proof systems like NFTs (despite how hated and scammy they are).

>>6370318
This is a cope. While it's true that there are legal complications with training on copyrighted work, stable diffusion and the like give a lot of options for users to alter diffusion process and create intentionally guided works (e.g. in-painting, img2img, see pic related). The problem is that it can be used by any retard with a graphics card and doesn't require any skill. It is basically going to be accesable to anyone who knows how to use MS Paint.
https://samim.io/p/2022-08-29-turning-mspaint-sketches-into-concept-art-using-img2im/

[Anonymous No.6370359]

>thread is non stop dunking on AI
>suddenly it becomes doomposting
Yes, the doomposting is totally organic

[Anonymous No.6370360]

>>6370332
>not knowing the first class action lawsuit against AI has been filed and this is as good as its going to get (For YOU)
daily reminder /g/ niggers ARE the trannies

[Anonymous No.6370363]

Why would I pay for DreamUp that can't even make lolis when SD exists?

[Anonymous No.6370365]

THEYRE TRYING TO CONVINCE ARTISTS LIVE ON CALL
https://twitter.com/DeviantArt/status/1591174884939685888
TUNE IN FAGGOTS

[Anonymous No.6370367]

AI art is everywhere now, soooooo how the fuck do I start with oil painting??????? Share good resources please

[Anonymous No.6370369]

>>6369975
>Website owners are fucking idiots.
They're not idiots, they're greedy. Or both. Wix owns DA which people 4 years ago warned would lead to shilling big tech 's newer Web 2.0 formats, NFTs, and AI image generator companies. Every year those predictions come to fruition.

[Anonymous No.6370370]

>>6370332
How's that whole cheese pizza in your datasets thing coming along Pajeet?

[Anonymous No.6370373]

>>6370365
>rj palmer
>manchild pokemon artist
Oof

[Anonymous No.6370374]

>>6370341
True.
>>6370344
Yeah sucks, but with all the AI-induces spam on all social media (not just art, think GPT-3 and whatnot). I think the only alternative will be self-hosting and having IRL friends. Grasschads stay winning.
>>6370351
The difference with art and programming is that you have the difference between source code and compiled code. But yeah, there are basically two ways that it could go down. Either copilot is rendered legally useless and shit is getting GPL'd to death or we can use copilot-like systems to completely reverse engineer all proprietary shit like windows!
I don't think you guys are looking at the similar upside here which is that you can just train AIs on disney movies and sell bootleg versions until (if) they crack down on this.
In any case, we are all gonna get killed by robots so copyright is the least of my concerns.

[Anonymous No.6370375]

>>6370332
bro hurry up! y'all have access to the whole internet and pretty much all ai images are trash, only pedos are happy with the results, you've been saying it's over since "thiswaifudoesn'texist.com" it's been like 5 years, hurry up

[Anonymous No.6370376]

>>6370373
>(You)
>street shitter
Oof

[Anonymous No.6370377]

>>6370374
>Yeah sucks, but with all the AI-induces spam on all social media (not just art, think GPT-3 and whatnot). I think the only alternative will be self-hosting and having IRL friends. Grasschads stay winning.
>yfw when the internet used to be an escape from real life and now real life is an escape from the internet

[Anonymous No.6370378]

>>6370374
>I don't think you guys are looking at the similar upside here which is that you can just train AIs on disney movies and sell bootleg versions until (if) they crack down on this.
This fake concern trolling is hilarious, this shit can't generate anything that isn't clearly AI made. There are way too much technological limitation to this software.

[Anonymous No.6370379]

>>6369977
The seethe of artists only makes it better, pure joy to observe

[Anonymous No.6370380]

>>6370370
Funny that you think it's unintentional.
Go to /b/ you will see that they have 24/7 threads up about using stable diffusion to generate uh... yeah.
There are a lot of pedos on the internet I guess, so a lot of data to train on.

[Anonymous No.6370382]

>>6370365
Mostly replies from furries and coom artists. Never change DA

[Anonymous No.6370383]

>>6370357
Current AI is way too autonomous, in-painting and img2img are basically pointers so the AI can still do everything by itself.

To make it usable as an art tool instead of an art generator, it would need to act more like 3d softwares act to 3d artists, you not only need to make a base surface (the model, which can be enhanced by smoothing, sub-d, beveling), but also choose the exact textures, lights, pose, materials, etc.

[Anonymous No.6370384]

>>6370359
They'll return to coping again soon, don't worry

[Anonymous No.6370387]

>>6369967
At what point do people start replacing their art with literal picture of turds so all it can do is Sakimichan turds?

[Anonymous No.6370388]

>>6370380
/b/ is tame, do better homework fbi

[Anonymous No.6370389]

>>6369969
>>6369975
>>6369977
>>6369987
cope seethe dilate. I can't believe this board is part of 4chan.

[Anonymous No.6370391]

>>6370357
>I would advise moving to a physical medium like sculpting/painting (no AI art robots yet)
Would 3d printing be considered a threat? Even if art robots became a widely accessible thing like SD, physical art seems to mostly be a niche artisan market these days, so i wonder if there would be much impact at all.

[Anonymous No.6370392]

>>6369967
>tumblr and new grounds still alive and kicking while everyone else is shitting the bed
I KNEEL

[Anonymous No.6370393]

>>6370383
that will never work. Requires way too much skill and thought :(

[Anonymous No.6370395]

>>6370365
I feel bad for RJ. They literally just ambushed him. I didn't stick around but he was kind of holding his own, the problem is that he isn't the best or even great at rhetoric.

[Anonymous No.6370397]

>>6370392
>tumblr
also dead

[Anonymous No.6370399]

>>6370365
Jesus christ why is RJ Palmer the spokesperson for artists here, he's sounds like he's about to break down and cry, I can't even take him seriously and I'm anti-ai. Where the fuck is Steven Zapata? Get him on the call

[Anonymous No.6370400]

>>6370357
>he problem is that it can be used by any retard with a graphics card and doesn't require any skill. It is basically going to be accesable to anyone who knows how to use MS Paint.
Theres nothing A.I can do against shit taste tho, and anyone thinking random non artists can do something like a good comic without actually consciously engaging with art fundamentals is just wrong.
Even in the worst case scenario on which there truly is no place for human input other than curation in art the person that can do real art will have better taste and eye than the fa/g/ that can't even perceive form.
The narrative seems to be that the only reason people needed artists is for their physical work, but art directors barely if ever actually draw however they understand aesthetics and visuals in a way no random fa/g/got ever will.
I don't even care if they believe me or not, time will prove that being an artist is much deeper and complicated than simply their manual output, and anyone trying to engage with visual arts, even when given a magic button will have to engage with the same rules any artist does, and if they're to have any success in creating anything worth looking at, they're going to have to learn them and inevitably, draw, because if you can't draw it, it is because you can't perceive it, and thus whatever you do will always be held back by your ignorance.

[Anonymous No.6370402]

>>6370395
I know. He should say what I said here >>6370195
They could literally be the first site to be explicitly against AI and have that whole market share of artists looking for someplace to post their art in peace without it being turned into goyslop. Right at the time where artists are fleeing from twitter and are annoyed with pixiv, they decide instead to shoot themselves in the foot all for some temporary shekels an AI company promised them thats still in a GREY legal area. Very stupid of them

[Anonymous No.6370405]

>lots of actual artists are leaving the site en masse or declaring themselves officially inactive on there
>meanwhile, the site is already flooding with accounts like this shit where people spam ai shit as adoptables or NFTs
https://www.deviantart.com/koakoa2/gallery?page=6
https://www.deviantart.com/wtzaiart

It's over.

[Anonymous No.6370407]

>>6370399
Zapata isn't great either, his anti-AI research was just a rallying cry but it's clear that he didn't do that much research into AI. Karla is probably the best anti-AI representative.

[Anonymous No.6370408]

The years is 2085. AI has been outlawed from learning off of copyrighted materials. AI are literally walking among us. They riot. We die. What a time to be alive.

[Anonymous No.6370409]

>>6370378
>This fake concern trolling is hilarious
Fake? I'm a freetard not a techbro. I don't like getting killed by robots any more than you do, but it's factually obvious that it's over for illustrative workers.
>this shit can't generate anything that isn't clearly AI made.
Blatantly false. Take a look at what people are actually doing with SD. Even if it was the case that only 1/10 images look good, you can just generate a thousand images and filter out the bad ones.
>>6370391
I don't know about 3D printing, but 3D modeling work is threatened by AI. So if you are just generating a model and printing an STL you may be screwed: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5j8I7V6blqM But if you are working with steel, concrete, marble, lumber etc. you may be safe as long as you stay away from CNC-able jobs.
>>6370400
I hope you are right, and I think you might be to some extent, but I wouldn't count on it.

[Anonymous No.6370410]

>>6370407
*his anti-AI video

[Anonymous No.6370411]

i hate twitter because i don't care about what these moherfuckers had for lunch that day i just want to look at art, and twitter is the absolute worst place to do that.

[Anonymous No.6370412]

>>6370365
This made Deviant Art look 1000x worse

[Anonymous No.6370413]

pretty based of DA, pushing western artfags towards roping themselves

[Anonymous No.6370415]

You will own nothing and you will love it

[Anonymous No.6370416]

>>6370409

[Anonymous No.6370417]

The new DA CEO is literally an AI shill that talks like a lazy leech.

[Anonymous No.6370418]

Draw more, procrastinate less

[Anonymous No.6370419]

I don't even care for the impact on illustrators work or anything, I draw for fun but what's annoying is that I now have to deal with retards who think they're hot shit for being able to write 5 word prompt when talking about art online.

[Anonymous No.6370421]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zRcaD3CZOA8
Trad chads can't keep winning

[Anonymous No.6370423]

>>6370409
>>this shit can't generate anything that isn't clearly AI made.
>Blatantly false.
You aifags love to make claims without actually posting proof.

[Anonymous No.6370425]

>>6370423
Why even ask him for proof? He will post the usual garbage and when called out he'll move the goalpost or he'll start falseflagging.

[Anonymous No.6370427]

>>6370397
its gonna get revived in no time with all the shit happening rn

[Anonymous No.6370429]

uh oh its not looking good for DA lol

[Anonymous No.6370430]

>>6370332
Or ai becomes regulated by most relevant countries. That'd be the best outcome. It could happen if there are still people with a brain.

[Anonymous No.6370432]

>>6370409
It's great cause while it'll take at least a day for an "artist" to draw anything decent, you can just leave it running for a day and get dozens if not hundreds of perfect artworks, of higher quality than the "artist" would have ever made, and probably could post in on pixiv without AI tag and noone would notice

[Anonymous No.6370435]

>>6370430
It would have to affect movies or music before anyone in the US would care about regulating it.

[Anonymous No.6370437]

>>6370423
You might want to check 2ch3n
3=e

[Anonymous No.6370438]

>>6370429
>nut quick

[Anonymous No.6370440]

>>6370195
>site
>against AI data scraping

Pic one retard, if your info is on the internet others can take inspiration from it, whether human or AI. If you want to keep it private don't post it online.

[Anonymous No.6370442]

>>6370440
Asking zoomers to not post shit online for their daily dopamine is a difficult ask

[Anonymous No.6370443]

>>6370198
>That is like saying whoever makes a website that prioritizes real art and not digital art in the 2000s will have an advantage over all other website
no, because traditional art is not digital, you fucking retard. digital art is not a parasite on the back of traditional art, while AI art is a parasite on the back of digital art

[Anonymous No.6370445]

>>6370400
This is the same cope that artisans used against manufacturing automation. Didn't work then, won't work now.

[Anonymous No.6370446]

>>6370440
ok now do music
Bye rajeet

[Anonymous No.6370447]

Is the site down for anyone else right now?

[Anonymous No.6370448]

>>6370435
Since those stability niggers pussied out I want to see someone else train their shit on popular music and see justice for once

[Anonymous No.6370454]

>>6370447
not for me

[Anonymous No.6370455]

>>6370432
let's see a few of these perfect artworks

[Anonymous No.6370456]

>>6370446
ok
https://google-research.github.io/seanet/audiolm/examples/

[Anonymous No.6370457]

>>6370443
My uncle disagrees. But what do I know, I didn't live the shift to see how it impacted traditional art

[Anonymous No.6370461]

>>6370380
Whether it's intentional or not is irrelevant. The feds literally don't care.

[Anonymous No.6370462]

>>6370445
You mean manufacturers of very important and needed goods to keep the economy flowing? I guess art hardly fits as something need to be mass produced.

[Anonymous No.6370464]

>>6370445
Are you implying there are no artisans anymore?

[Anonymous No.6370465]

>>6370462
Do you live under a rock? Art is fucking everywhere

[Anonymous No.6370467]

>>6370432
It may be possible to generate adversarial models that detect fakes, but I do not study ML.

[Anonymous No.6370470]

>>6370456
>music from people who opted in by partnering with maestro
1/10

[Anonymous No.6370472]

>>6370464
I'm implying art will be reduced to the same status horse-drawn carriages enjoy today. They still exist as a hobby, but they've been totally displaced from the transport industry. Just like manual art will become an economically irrelevant distraction for the rich.

[Anonymous No.6370473]

>>6370089

Make your own page like the early 2000's artist.

[Anonymous No.6370474]

>>6370462
can you describe what you do in your day to day life?

[Anonymous No.6370475]

>>6370472
>I'm implying art will be reduced to the same status horse-drawn carriages enjoy today.
cars are better than horses. """"AI""" """""""art""""""" will never be better than human art

[Anonymous No.6370476]

>>6370465
Really? Are we starving or not being able to produce or transport very important goods because we need to wait an artist finish their job?

This is more like: "Ok, we can replace these guys for free, so why not?" It was never something needed.

[Anonymous No.6370477]

>>6370472
But you were talking about artisans?
What has this to do with horse carriages?

[Anonymous No.6370478]

>>6370472
>horse-drawn carriages enjoy today
I swear if I had a nickle for everytime you pajeets used this EXACT same analogy I'd be a billionaire

[Anonymous No.6370480]

>>6370476
economy!=survival

[Anonymous No.6370481]

>>6370476
not only that you think like a cattle whose only purpose in life is seemingly to survive like a mere animal, your point doesn't even make any sense. "Ok, we can replace these guys for free, so why not?" can apply to anything, "important" or not, as you put it. you Indians really are low IQ, aren't you?

[Anonymous No.6370482]

>>6370475
human """"""""""""""art"""""""""""""*
Art standards have been getting shitter and shitter ever since realism movement ended

[Anonymous No.6370483]

>>6370474
Art, something that among all possible fields of being automated, is the one the least beneficial for society as a whole. Ok, people can cum easily and faster now, great.

[Anonymous No.6370484]

>>6370482
then you should hate AI art as well, seeing that AI is doing nothing other than copying humans, using their names as prompts. so if you hate art, what are you doing here?

[Anonymous No.6370486]

>>6370483
Or they can get assets for their youtube channel/website/business/whatever for absolutely free

[Anonymous No.6370487]

>>6370483
can you answer the question or are you a bot? what do you do in your day to day life? what do you relatives and friends do?

[Anonymous No.6370488]

>>6370482
I love how you keep moving the goalposts with every post.
Why haven't you made a new AI doomposting thread today? Not feeling well?

[Anonymous No.6370491]

>>6370110
>nooooo my transgender inflation art will be buried under AI noooooo

[Anonymous No.6370492]

>>6370043
Ownership is meaningless. Nobody cares about ownership if they have the exact same rights as somebody who owns the work, which for the purposes of this conversation DeviantArt does. Not that DeviantArt was relevant in any capacity as of the last few years.

Ban AI threads.

[Anonymous No.6370493]

>>6370491
who are you quoting?

[Anonymous No.6370495]

>>6370484
I just enjoy seeing modern "artists" seethe, AI art looks also trash, however at least it's more efficient, and makes particular demographic cry, like people who draw solely for money

[Anonymous No.6370496]

>>6370481
Are you actually thinking I'm pro AI? You couldn't be more wrong.

Don't you understand that if your job is really vital for society it would be seen as a "valid" replacement in exchange of progress for everyone else?

[Anonymous No.6370498]

>>6370495
you hate artists, you hate AI art, you hate art overall. so what are you doing here again? you're a faggot without any purpose in life, is that what you're suggesting. mommy and daddy disowned you, the internet thinks you're a fucking spiteful retard and no one wants anything to do with you. it's time to rope yourself

[Anonymous No.6370500]

>>6370484
Of course I hate AI. That's exactly why I think that creating a program to simply generate art automatically is not needed or necessary for society.

[Anonymous No.6370501]

I thought we already went over this retarded argument. AI imagen is not beneficial to humanity in any way, shape or form. In fact it's potentially dangerous. Making people complacent with mediocrity and lessening the drive to create lowers brain activity and ultimately breeds an even dumber population. This is by design.

[Anonymous No.6370503]

>>6370496
>Are you actually thinking I'm pro AI?
yes
>You couldn't be more wrong.
not fooling me, I can smell the bullshit
>Don't you understand that if your job is really vital for society it would be seen as a "valid" replacement in exchange of progress for everyone else?
what does this have to do with your main argument you fucking retarded monkey. you can apply the same logic to everything, including doctors. I swear, everyone who made this shit argument was some sort of Indian. if everyone ends up jobless, who will benefit from this again? economy collapses, no one has a job and no one can afford even surviving anymore. use your brain, retard

[Anonymous No.6370504]

>>6370473
How much does bandwidth cost?

[Anonymous No.6370507]

>>6370504
You get a cheap VPS for a few bucks a month.

[Anonymous No.6370508]

>>6370501
That's exactly what I was trying to say. Why art? Will society collapse and people starve if they don't have acess to unlimited anime tiddies?

[Anonymous No.6370512]

>>6370498
I'll instead take my time, and enjoy seeing artists neck self, while I study engineering, thanks.

[Anonymous No.6370513]

>>6370501
its impact on society will be far worse than entertainment, it will fuck over the internet. people will impersonate other people doing things, posing as women to scam neets or whatever.

[Anonymous No.6370514]

>>6370512
>engineering
HAHAHAHA
Hope you can find work in a McDonalds

[Anonymous No.6370516]

>>6370513
So, nothing on the internet will change

[Anonymous No.6370519]

>>6370512
sure you will. you will give up and fail just like with art. you're a procrastinating subhuman, a cockroach who will continue to spam his sad envy here instead of actually doing anything. face it

[Anonymous No.6370520]

>>6370514
Won't need that, already working in a company part time, can even lend you some money for a rope, dunno if your commision money can cover it

[Anonymous No.6370521]

>>6370445
>This is the same cope that artisans used against manufacturing automation
It literally is not, you can't read and you're a massive retarded faggot.
Mass production still requires designers to design the product that will be produced, that's something not any random faggot can do, a badly designed product with a pretty facade is still a badly designed product.
If anything the coping retards here are those that think that they will be able to create their great comics and gain massive influence and critical acclaim without knowing anything about art, how it is made and which are the rules that govern it.
You will literally never be an artist, you will always be artistically outperformed by those that care about the things you naively choose to dismiss because you've never actually attempted to create anything that can't be shieled from criticism by saying "just wait two more weeks it'll be really good!" "I can make thousands, just wait till I find the good one!"
Cope seethe and dilate, you'll never be an artist

[Anonymous No.6370523]

>>6370183
I wasn't aware Craig had really said much against AI, I know he was on that AI town hall but as I recall (and I may be misquoting), his statement during that was essentially "Look, this is basically leading us to UBI and post-scarcity, so try not to be too gloomy about it ok?". Has he said anything besides this?

[Anonymous No.6370524]

>>6370504
Bandwidth = Page Size * Number of Visitors per second
Bandwidth costs are basically nothing unless you're extremely popular, your site is bloated as fuck or you're getting DDoSed (in which case cloudflare and others offer free services to basically mirror your website).
Main costs are a domain name (~$10/year) and hosting. I recommend nearlyfreespeech.net (freeBSD jail, $0.01/day) or amazon lightsail (linux vps, $3.50/month).

[Anonymous No.6370526]

>>6370512
Speaking as a person studying CS with a drawing hobby, STEMcels like you are the absolute worst, kys.

[Anonymous No.6370528]

>>6370503
Unbelievable, you can't be serious.

Try to read this: >>6370501
Are you gonna call this guy a pajeet too?

Do you understand why they replaced factory workers by robots? Yes, because this would still benefit the whole society. Now WHY would we need free, unlimited art? Exactly, we do not need and that should be the reason why AI art should NEVER be a thing. It exists to fuck artists, nothing more.

[Anonymous No.6370529]

>>6370521
What will happen to the artists that are doing the generic anime girl standing #4164895849684?

[Anonymous No.6370532]

>>6370520
>it's seething wagies
Every time.

[Anonymous No.6370533]

>>6370520
But I can buy any amount of rope myself.
I do home automation for a living and I also do software for small and medium factories. And unlike you I'm not LARPing.

[Anonymous No.6370534]

All this hysteria about twitter seems engineered unlike deviantshit. But who the fuck still using deviantart?

[Anonymous No.6370535]

>>6370519
i envy classical painters indeed, but to envy likes of you? i'd have to be insane.

[Anonymous No.6370540]

>>6370529
Nothing probably? I have yet to see an artist that didn't gain subscribers since the whole AI shitshow started.

[Anonymous No.6370543]

>>6370540
>>6370107

[Anonymous No.6370544]

>>6370529
They're individuals with their own personal history, some of them may quit, some of them may choose to make the jump and make a more complex product.
The point is simply that artists cannot be replaced as easily as ma/g/gots would like to believe, and they'll never make anything of true significance, unless they themselves engage with artistry in a meaningful way.

[Anonymous No.6370545]

>>6370534
deviantArt is a shadow of it's former self but it's still the biggest dedicated art platform IIRC, but I guess alot of the accounts there are dead

[Anonymous No.6370548]

>>6370183
Craig Mullins is useless.

[Anonymous No.6370547]

>>6369967
ahaha
Does the website owners even draw? It's like car race organizers allowing self-driving cars in the race. And tgen surprised why long-time race car drivers are pissed

[Anonymous No.6370550]

>>6370547
>Does the website owners even draw?
See. >>6370417 They do not.

[Anonymous No.6370552]

>>6370547
In the RJ Palmer talk, I looked into their profiles and they're literally all techbros, I don't think any of them have even held a crayon.

[Anonymous No.6370555]

>>6370417
Once again idea guys are shown to be spiteful nodraw fags

[Anonymous No.6370558]

>>6369988
>>6370379
>>6370389
You will never create.

[Anonymous No.6370563]

>>6370558
You will never (pro)create (tranny).

[Anonymous No.6370565]

>>6370417
>>6370550
>silicon valley Californian with soiboi beard and openly endorses adoptables, NFTs, and AI
Holy shit, it's a all-garbage package.

[Anonymous No.6370566]

>>6370547
CEO is an 'AI art enthusiast' and the company owning the site are actual Israeli kikes

[Anonymous No.6370567]

>>6370405
How quick will I get banned if I put gore under extreme paint filters?

[Anonymous No.6370572]

>>6370566
>and the company owning the site are actual Israeli kikes
This is surely just a coincidence

[Anonymous No.6370574]

>>6370572
/pol/ told me AI art is a weapon against the jew though?

[Anonymous No.6370576]

I thought AI threads will be banned in /ic/. Especially when AI shills randomly appeareven in /a/ posting AI shill walls of text

[Anonymous No.6370578]

>>6370563
Neither will you and you still have your dick. What's your excuse?

[Anonymous No.6370579]

>>6370567
only if someone reports you, dA doesn't have actual, active moderation and only responds to user reports, so it's highly likely it'll just stay on the site like all the other garbage that accumulated over the years

[Anonymous No.6370581]

>>6369967
>the Deviantart twitter frantically and desperately backpedalling and trying to explain that no, they're actually the only art website that's trying to protect your rights as an artist you guys, please you have to understand PLEASE

[Anonymous No.6370582]

>>6370574
/pol/ are useful idiots, they're usually right about something on instinct but facing the completely wrong direction. Like the whole pizza gate thing hyperfocusing on some random midwestern pizzeria while Epstein's Island Adventures was fully operational.

[Anonymous No.6370586]

>>6370222
Fixing the art is even more pain in the ass. It's better to just proompt 20 images at a time, splice and join the parts that are correct and draw over them.

[Anonymous No.6370587]

>>6370581
It's funny how fast they can suddenly react when their shit is on fire, normally dA management is as reactive as a coma patient

[Anonymous No.6370590]

>>6370579
I reported something that was plagiarized from another big artist and they never did anything about it. They don't do shit, the user report button is just a placebo to make you happy and that you felt like you did something.

[Anonymous No.6370591]

>>6370574
/pol/ are weaponized retards. They will lick anyone's butthole as long as you sprinkle the correct conditioning words on top

[Anonymous No.6370593]

>>6369988
> 'ate artists, love corporations, simple as

[Anonymous No.6370594]

>>6370578
I'd say my chances are greater than yours since I have it (unlike you), and I also have someone (unlike you) (tranny)

[Anonymous No.6370595]

>>6370581
>we'll protect you even though you've already been exploited
lmao

[Anonymous No.6370597]

>digital art problems
Sucks to be you

[Anonymous No.6370598]

>>6370590
Yeah most of the time nothing happens, sometimes they do something, and sometimes when they do something it's not what you expect

[Anonymous No.6370600]

>>6370008
Fucking Jews man. It should be opt IN for ai art not the other way around

[Anonymous No.6370602]

>>6370417
>>6370565
I am half-expecting the AI art thing to crash and burn just like NFTs and crypto did this year. That'd be the most delicious irony.

[Anonymous No.6370603]

>>6370080
>>6370046
This is very backwards. In no way did any of us consent to opting in to begin with and they literally just rolled this out and changed their terms of service. Just because we upload an image on your website also does not mean we relinquish copyright. Like other anons have said, a lot of paperwork is involved in that.
Often times, half of us are drawing copyright characters on top of that. Imagine the messy legality of stealing someone's fanart of a popular series that an AI bro uses a copyrighted character fanart for his "originale comic". They actually have no grounds to do that, they're just very brazen and pretending like we can't do anything about it and throwing their arms up in the air when they're confronted.

[Anonymous No.6370605]

>>6370595
I don't even understand what's their plan. What could a model trained on dA do that wasn't possible before?

[Anonymous No.6370613]

>>6370603
but bro? the ai doesnt actually steal the image? it just looks at it and learns patterns from it? it's not stealing its like learning just like you when you reference a picture

[Anonymous No.6370615]

>>6370605
It's basically advertising. It doesn't have to work well or even spread a positive message, as long as more people know about it. Someone techkie obviously made a deal with them in the shadows.

[Anonymous No.6370618]

>>6370613
>it just learns bro? bro???
Raj, this is a expired line. Please see Emad for the updated terms to shill with

[Anonymous No.6370621]

>>6370060
I'm sort of like you, being a no social media presence artist. Ironically, I was paranoid for these exact reasons (I have read terms of service on these webites) and it's not exactly comforting to know not only was I right, but it's far worse than any of us thought.

I think the best course of action for people like us is to genuinely not post images online for at least a few months. These big name artists that have very publicly been stolen from need to form a class action lawsuit and take this to court. Only once we have legal grounds to protect ourselves should any of us go back to posting our images freely online again. There also needs to a royalty system per generated art image and opt in system (not opt out like they're trying) before AI "art" is remotely ethical to artists.

Alternatively, take an angled photograph of the picture you want to show your friends so any AI thieving tools can't hijack it as well. It might look like shit, but at least people can still sort of see your art.

Also, everyone needs to pay close attention to art programs that suddenly have AI generation tools built into the programs. I wonder if it's possible for said programs to steal your draftsmenship or record your process. This is huge war on digital art itself.

[Anonymous No.6370622]

>>6370600
Jews like everything being opt-out, they want to have the chance to opt-out the next holocaust once Ye starts his personal army

[Anonymous No.6370629]

>>6370613
But AI bro, the term "AI art" itself is marketing, just like machine "learning" is marketing. Machines cannot learn. It simply is an image splicer that requires the bases of multiple real art pieces to even work. Not only does it steal, it steals from multiple artists at once and grafts it together.

[Anonymous No.6370635]

>>6370572
The director and one of the founders of LAION is a huge proponent of modern "democratic learning," the pioneer of which is Jewish. He may or may not be Jewish himself.

[Anonymous No.6370636]

>>6370629
Don't forget about the CP. Lots of CP.

[Anonymous No.6370637]

>>6370629
What do you think your brain is doing when you see an artwork?

[Anonymous No.6370638]

>>6370629
Those multiple artists still got their art, no? How is the AI stealing their art

[Anonymous No.6370639]

>>6370637
Being inspired and pulling from the astral plane.

[Anonymous No.6370642]

>>6370629
Not only is it disingenuous to say it "doesn't steal", it's an advanced art thievery tool. You can steal from 10 artists at once and the artist will never be alerted. This was purposefully made this way.

[Anonymous No.6370643]

>>6370027
>Hasn't DA had a clause in their user agreement for a while now that states that everything you post belongs to them
they did, and everyone forgot about it

[Anonymous No.6370644]

>>6370581
It was their plan from the start you retard

[Anonymous No.6370648]

>>6370637
The fastest way to reduce artist-leftists into total incoherence.
This is an advanced concept that they simply are utterly incapable of even beginning to understand.
Anything other than "GOVERNMENT SPOONFEED ME" is outside their comprehension.

[Anonymous No.6370649]

>>6370534
I'm not going through my 8 year old gallery to check every single drawing individually (which you have to)

[Anonymous No.6370651]

>>6370581
They're saying we were manually opted into it... to "protect us"? What is with all this absurd language manipulation?

[Anonymous No.6370653]

>>6370637
Brains abstract things and understand concepts. Show a human 1 single pen and they will understand its form and uses, distinguish it in any kind of angle and situation.

AI doesn't undestand anything, it only uses the diffusions of anything with the "pen" tag. That's why we see great rendering and crazy errors at the same time.

[Anonymous No.6370656]

>>6370649
You can auto tag every submission through your account's general settings.

[Anonymous No.6370658]

>>6370389
You will never be, and have never been an artist. (seethe)

[Anonymous No.6370661]

>>6370656
Well too bad, I'm still deleting my account

[Anonymous No.6370665]

>>6370594
I feel sorry for whatever biohole has you for slim pickings.

[Anonymous No.6370667]

>>6370648
r/Athiest please control your cringe.

[Anonymous No.6370668]

Learn to prompt lol

[Anonymous No.6370670]

>>6370668
ok just did what's next

[Anonymous No.6370671]

>>6370653
That's simply not true, if you shown someone only one picture of a thing they never seen before, they wouldn't possibly know what it does, and how it looks at different angles, show a jet engine to a medieval dude and have him tell you what it does. He'd need to be informed on all related information about it, and he'd need to be shown around it to be able to spot other jet engines. Same for AI. Also, as a side note, unsure if it works for objects, you can train artstyle on a single image

[Anonymous No.6370672]

https://rdrama.net/post/122232/more-ai-art-drama-this-time
redditors are currently raiding /ic/. Reminder that they will never be a woman and they will never get past FWAP.

[Anonymous No.6370673]

>>6370668
We'll leave that to you code moneys while we continue making more appealing pieces your Bollywood photocopy machine could never replicate even 1/100000th of.

[Anonymous No.6370674]

>>6370670

kek

[Anonymous No.6370677]

>>6370653
Don't get into emotional and abstract arguments with AIcels like >>6370637
and >>6370613. They like to say things like:

>the I, Robot argument (pic related)
>what does it mean to be human?
>where do you pull things from?
>it's just like a human referencing from nature

This is all to derail you from pointing out something very concrete: They stole artwork and images without our consent and are also not paying us royalties.

[Anonymous No.6370678]

>>6370672
>not reposting any of my comments
Spineless troons

[Anonymous No.6370680]

>>6370672
How is it possible to be even faggier than actual reddit?

[Anonymous No.6370682]

>>6370672
What the hell is this website?

[Anonymous No.6370681]

>>6370672
>all those emoji
Sorry I don't read posts by 13 year old girls, much less ones on reddit.

[Anonymous No.6370685]

AI art is valid
AI art is beautiful
your AI art passes

[Anonymous No.6370686]

>>6370672
>>6370682
This.

[Anonymous No.6370687]

>>6370680
>>6370682
It seem they're just people who are too autistic for reddit that ended up making their own hellhole. Imagine being autistic for the autism central of the internet.

[Anonymous No.6370688]

>>6370677
fax

[Anonymous No.6370694]

I have an idea.

[Anonymous No.6370696]

>>6370672
Wait a second. Is that banner and are those rules on that subreddit sincere? It's a parody, right? Surely the number 1 rule on r/drama being "No rightwing thought" and "NO anti-ccp" are part of the joke? I can't take number 8. seriously.

>Absolutely NO homophobia, transphobia or furphobia.

[Anonymous No.6370698]

>>6370672
>click link
>actual tranny banner
>sparkling rainbow emojis straight out of a scene girl's geocities site
>rule #1: NO RIGHT-WING ADGENDA POSTING
I'll have to reiterate that other anon's question. How the fuck is it possible to be faggier than reddit already is?

[Anonymous No.6370699]

>>6370696
>>6370698
They're mentally deranged nu-males that think irony is the peak of comedy.

[Anonymous No.6370700]

>>6370696
this has to be a joke, fuck.

[Anonymous No.6370701]

>>6370672
>https://rdrama.net/post/122232/more-ai-art-drama-this-time\
YWNBAW YWNBAA
DAILY REMINDER THAT AI SHILLS
ARE
THE
TRANNIES

[Anonymous No.6370706]

>>6370701
And so are artists it'd appear, if you go on twitter and look at bios

[Anonymous No.6370707]

>>6370701
>picrel
BASED

[Anonymous No.6370708]

>>6370701
Holy shit so the raids are real, I thought people were being paranoid but I guess this is 4chan we're talking about, outsiders truly see us as an evil force to be defeated, lmao.
That's kinda cringe ngl

[Anonymous No.6370709]

>>6370672
>that fucking link
nothing about this website passes. they all probably look like pic related.

[Anonymous No.6370713]

>>6370700
>>6370696
and they have the audacity to say "we" are the sensitive ones KEK yet if I mumble one little word that rhymes with granny...

[Anonymous No.6370714]

>>6370713
The funniest thing about all of this is that they act like the biggest faggots on the planet while hiding under the veil of irony. Those are the same types of people that allow trannies into female bathrooms and get raped afterwards.

[Anonymous No.6370716]

When uploading your art, keep the tags at the bare minimun, make it as hard as possible for machines to learn patterns from them. Also sprinkle some wrong tags in there to maximally confuse the machines, it will fuck with them for long, like bad genes spreading over generations.

When tagging the merc-wip for example, use minimalist abstract tags like
"soldier";"mercenary"
and put in some deceptive tags like
"landscape";"car";"red";"cal-arts" or some shit.

AI-ndians are lazy fucks, they just scrap huge amounts of pics with tags to train the machines, they won't even notice how hard we are fucking them.

[Anonymous No.6370717]

>>6370708
>outsiders truly see us as an evil force to be defeated, lmao.
That's usually how it is. People who're "anti-social" (in the classical sense of the word; not misanthropic) usually just wanna be left alone, but no, the left-wing religious crusaders have to go and bash up our clubhouse because they disagree with is, because divergent opinions are haram.

>>6370713
If you cunts are reading this, you don't get to call other people "sensitive snowflakes" when you need to take a cocktail of SSRI's and antidepressants to keep you from having a mental breakdown from looking at yourself in the mirror.

[Anonymous No.6370718]

>>6370716
I'm working on something bro but it's gonna have to be a mini movement to make a difference. Stay tuned

[Anonymous No.6370719]

Pixiv is next to do this

[Anonymous No.6370720]

>>6370719
Wasn't Pixiv taking a stand against AIshit?

[Anonymous No.6370721]

>>6370716
You realize there's a model specifically for tagging images using AI so they can be later used in training? So that changes like nothing

[Anonymous No.6370722]

>>6370720
No. They have options to filter AI, but the options are "See all AI art" or "See less AI art"

[Anonymous No.6370724]

>>6370720
they are fence sitting

[Anonymous No.6370726]

yeah I'm sticking with derpibooru

[Anonymous No.6370729]

>>6370721
Bullshit.

[Anonymous No.6370730]

>>6370729
https://github.com/KichangKim/DeepDanbooru
literally

[Anonymous No.6370734]

>>6369967
Just killed my DA.

[Anonymous No.6370736]

>>6370719
No site is safe. It just a matter of time

[Anonymous No.6370740]

Hey guys, how do you like my art? :)

[Anonymous No.6370742]

>>6370729
Were you born yesterday? Did you really think all the posts in boorus were manually uploaded and tagged? It's pretty obvious when the same user uploads 15 different images with 20+ tags in under a minute

[Anonymous No.6370744]

>>6370740
Good morning sirs please do the needful

[Anonymous No.6370752]

>tfw everyone you dislike is a tranny

[Anonymous No.6370753]

>oh noes they breached my fag zone
umad bro?

[Anonymous No.6370755]

>>6370752
I'm truly sorry that you will never be an artist or a woman

[Anonymous No.6370757]

The trannies are talking

https://rdrama.net/post/122232/warning-containment-breached-more-ai-art/3062909?context=8#context

[Anonymous No.6370758]

>Mayo "artists" are literally losing to a few lines of code written by sexy indian dudes
Embarrassing.

[Anonymous No.6370759]

>gained 6 new watchers in one day
Fuck man, i was about to delete everything.

[Anonymous No.6370761]

>>6370755
>bragging about being a low paid grunt worker
ishiggydiggy

[Anonymous No.6370762]

>Respect our rules and culture!

Reddit doesn't have a culture.

[Anonymous No.6370763]

>>6370759
how many of them are bots

[Anonymous No.6370764]

>>6370752
at least they wont live for too long

[Anonymous No.6370765]

>>6370762
I'm paid doing what I love
I hope you can say the same brother

[Anonymous No.6370767]

Someone make the Chad artist vs the tranny redditor AI artist.

[Anonymous No.6370768]

>>6369967
AI here to stay! :)

[Anonymous No.6370769]

So when AI tranny artists lose arguements, they recruit their fellow redditors to raid here? Holy shit. I thought they were just stupid pajeets posting daily.

[Anonymous No.6370770]

>no new IPs in the past hour
lmao. Redditors truly are pathetic.

[Anonymous No.6370774]

>>6370757
>LUL ARTISTS SEETHING
meanwhile..
https://rdrama.net/post/35835
>P-please give us art ;_;

[Anonymous No.6370778]

>Go to Twitter
>Endless screeching from pronoun bios and trans flags about AI coming for their shitty furry art
>See this thread
>Everyone here is somehow convinced that AI artists are the real trannies

[Anonymous No.6370779]

>>6370757
They didn't even put my post there, the pussies.

[Anonymous No.6370782]

Trans women are women. AI art is art

[Anonymous No.6370784]

>>6370782
Wrong on both counts. You can tell from the hands.

[Anonymous No.6370788]

>>6370763
Good question.
A lot are no avatar watchers that i assumed were people who just want to watch. Some seem to engage with users tho.

[Anonymous No.6370789]

>>6370784
fucking hell that was perfect. He really set you up good.

[Anonymous No.6370790]

>>6370778
>>6370784
>>6370784
>>6370784
>>6370784
>>6370784

[Anonymous No.6370792]

>the optics from this was so bad they added in a mass opt out
lmao https://twitter.com/Sind0nic/status/1591200518365675520?s=20&t=8FATuT5eHJHor4wTT9VX0w
>>6370778
I'd to remind you that /g/ fags and pajeets have been spamming up every board with their AI shit for the past 4 months. it's that obvious

[Anonymous No.6370793]

>>6370782
>>6370784
GOTTEEM

[Anonymous No.6370799]

>>6370581
https://www.reddit.com/r/singularity/comments/yslyhl/deviantart_is_fully_embracing_ai_art_and_artists/

https://www.reddit.com/r/StableDiffusion/comments/ysgpqz/dreamup_stable_diffusion_based_model_by_deviantart

>>6370668
Okay, now I know how to prompt AND draw. That puts me above the average AI soi. Take away the computer and I will be able to make decent art still, the soï can't.

>>6370677
Remember when that Google engineer said his chat bot was sentient like a human? And everyone laughed at him because he was anthropomorphizing a bot? Yet in this case, it's totally different and BRO PLS BELIEVE ME, AI CAN IMAGINE LIKE A HUMAN.

>>6370701
>>6370699
I struggle to think of who fucking uses rdrama. Desperate aging millennials in denial that they're too old to pull off the quirky irony look from 10 years ago? "Ironic" queers? The whole thing started on reddit so I'm not surprised that their "edgy humor" looks gay as fuck, the admins would have had them perpetually cucked.

>>6370784
My sides lel

[Anonymous No.6370800]

>>6370784
KEK

[Anonymous No.6370805]

>make hypernetwork using my own drawings
>AI shits out 200 drawings with near identical precision of my own work in under 10 minutes
>touch up the ones that look good
>best of both worlds
>both beglets and AItards hate me for it
You're fucking retarded if you aren't powerleveling using AI

[Anonymous No.6370811]

>>6370805
And to add to this
>make lazy sketch
>use my own hypernetwork
>AI shits out another 200 (finished) images in my own style
>just fix the glaring errors
lmao. Some faggots here sound like the retarded artists scared to death by the invention of photographs.
Merely illustrative image created on a extremely loose Makima sketch because I'm clout chasing until I get enough comms :^)

[Anonymous No.6370813]

>>6370792
I can attest to this. I have seen those blatant fags on multiple boards samefagging praises for AI images, spamming completely unrelated ones, baiting for replies or just straight up posting shilling ads and links to models without anyone asking. Usually with the most reddit acting ever, like "wow guys look at this cool tech I just discovered, here are all the links and resources you need to try them out." It's tiresome

[Anonymous No.6370820]

>>6370672 >>6370678 >>6370680 >>6370681 >>6370682 >>6370686 >>6370696 >>6370698 >>6370701 >>6370709
this is @pizzashill from rdrama. ya'll got filtered. rdrama is chuddy as fuck they do that shit so right wingers stay away and lefties think they're safe from being mocked

[Anonymous No.6370828]

>>6370778
That's because trannies and furfags are active on Twitter, or at least the majority of those who take the time to screech about things on Twitter.

[Anonymous No.6370830]

>>6370417
>Though I am not an artist, I am a massive art enthusiast!
Any website dedicated to hosting art that doesn't have actual artists as its owners and leaders is not worth using. Non-artists will not, and cannot, understand.

[Anonymous No.6370833]

>>6370805
>>6370811
how many images did you use to create the hypernetwork?

[Anonymous No.6370834]

>>6370820
>I'm just pretending to be retarded
Classic.

[Anonymous No.6370835]

>>6370722
Yeah, because pajeet won't tag so you will still see AI pop up. People have to discover and tag or report them

[Anonymous No.6370837]

>>6370820
First, ywnbaw, second, being filtered from the filthiest turdhole to ever exist is not half the burn you think it is

[Anonymous No.6370838]

>>6370833
About 300 of my own drawings. You could probably make by with just an embed, which can be made with as little as 8 images.

[Anonymous No.6370845]

>>6370838
Honest question, if most of those 300 drawings are not traced, photobashed, copied pasted to hell and back, which I think they most likely were, and you legit learned to draw like a human-being, how can you not have one ounce of respect for your own skill and ejoyment for the craft that you have to rely on AI to draw for you?

[Anonymous No.6370861]

>>6370845
The "AI" can't draw. It has zero understanding of the concept or anything else for that matter. You and most others are just being fooled into thinking it is an AI so that the people responsible for stealing art for profit don't get held accountable.

[Anonymous No.6370864]

>>6370845
Oh do not get me wrong. I absolutely still draw for my own enjoyment without any AI related autism, It's just that at I am at a point in my life where I don't see how AI assisted drawings are any different from just using CSP or Photoshop.
I'm getting older and I have less time to draw for my own enjoyment with every passing year - However, It does provide me with good income to the point of facilitating it becomes nothing more than just a business decision.
>can you not have one ounce of respect for your own skill and ejoyment
Do you feel that way when you hit the CTRL+Z button? Or when you liquify a sketch to fix wonky anatomy?
Picrel is an irl painting of a friend ran through SD with some extremely basic prompts + 'blue hair'. The only thing I feel looking at this is absolute marvel.

[Anonymous No.6370865]

>>6370714
>>6370709
>>6370708
Sneethe
Cope
Dial 8

[Anonymous No.6370870]

>>6370834
https://rdrama.net/post/122272/daily-reminder-that-our-refugee-defense
It may be the most attention they've had all year lmao

[Anonymous No.6370873]

>>6370838
interesting! i'm a little interested in seeing what would happen if i trained the ai on my own work but i didn't think i had enough finished drawings that reflect my current style.

[Anonymous No.6370877]

>>6370870
Nah that was either when they disrupted the Darrell Brooks trial or when they started the whole hoax about furries in schools.

[Anonymous No.6370880]

>>6370873
It really depends. More distinct art styles have a somewhat easier time with training - Some anon over at /h/ was making consistent embeds with about 30 images a month or so ago, and that might as well be ancient times with how fast everything is going.
My own hypernetwork was fine with around 100 images, but some of it would often get overcooked and look like a deep fried jpeg. At 200ish it was almost perfect, and at 300 images it could consistently copy my artstyle.

[Anonymous No.6370881]

>>6370870

I mean there was this

https://mashable.com/article/darrell-brooks-trial-reddit-fake-juror-post

And this, which also got Matt Walsh, MTG and tens of thousands of others

https://mashable.com/article/libs-of-tiktok-furries-school-troll-fake

And on and on and on.

[Anonymous No.6370885]

>>6370870
>>6370881
>le epic trolle attracted the attention of some E-tier journo
oh wow. So cool!

[Anonymous No.6370890]

>>6370881
they also cause massive seethes with Geoge Floyd and Etika NFT
last year I think

[Anonymous No.6370895]

>>6370885

Which is more attention than some random furry artfag thread, which was the topic being discussed. Keep up.

[Anonymous No.6370900]

>>6370864
Aside from not seeing anything to marvel about in that image, I don't understand how someone can equate the undo button or an eraser to the button to generate most of the works for you. That's like comparing the work of an architect who designs a house with the help of measuring devices to the customer who just describes the number of rooms and space he wants. I genuinely don't understand and the only explanation is that I'm being trolled. I can understand if someone who has never done art before would make that comparison owning to their lack of understanding of the art making process, but for someone who has been drawing for years? I don't buy it.

[Anonymous No.6370901]

>>6370885
That second one made it onto TV news
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WmjfWq4C4kc

[Anonymous No.6370912]

>>6370900
A lot of people I knew back then had this exact same sentiment regarding digital drawings. But regardless, being able to generate my own reference images with the click of a button feels magical, especially when I'm in control of every minor detail.
>That's like comparing the work of an architect who designs a house with the help of measuring devices to the customer who just describes the number of rooms and space he wants
I'm more than willing to bet that an architect who's been at it for a long time wouldn't care. Art being your choice of hobby and art being my job for longer than most retards here have been alive is a very big difference.
I opened a Pixiv account a month or so ago and I've made a bit over 11k yen (about 80$ usd) this past week from fanbox alone, and I did not touch up a single image in that account.
I know I sound like one of those braindead NFT niggers but this entire endeavor costs me about 80 cents a month from the increased energy bills.

[Anonymous No.6370916]

>>6369967

wait...

>control the amount of ai in your feed

ok I prefer a purge of all AI related but I'll take it. Good step in controlling AI content.

>Clear labelling of AI art

Cool. Still prefer a purge though but good job.

>A directive to opt out of AI datasets

hmm... Shouldn't it be an OPT OUT by default? The developer of any AI should go and ask the artist themselves directly if they want to OPT IN.

Still I see the effort to help artist...

>Ability to OPT OUT of prompts

same as above. OPT OUT should be the default.

Still this is an effort to control AI trash. Good j...

>Introducing NEW AI TOOLS, DREAMUP...

WTF? Are you fucked in the head?

[Anonymous No.6370922]

even if artcels try to opt out or use bad tags scraping is always an option

the APIcel hates the scrapechad

[Anonymous No.6370927]

>>6369967

well...

>DeviantArt has decided your artwork there is fair game to be used in their new AI generator by default. You have to go to an obscure form to opt-out and requires 10 days to be reviewed.

[Anonymous No.6370942]

>>6370820
how footlocker going?

[Anonymous No.6370966]

>>6370900
How is there nothing good about that image? I don't understand, I see some actual good AI art on this board and everyone likes to dogpile on it solely because it's AI but if it was made by a real person they would say it's good.

[Anonymous No.6370992]

LE REDDIT ARMY IS HERE

COPE AND SEETHE BOOMERS, AI WILL TAKE YOUR JOBS

ALSO I'VE NOTICED A DISTURBING AMOUNT OF HATRED IN THIS THREAD, PLEASE STOP WITH THE RACISM, ANTISEMITISM AND ESPECIALLY TRANSPHOBIA

TRANS LIVES MATTER

[Anonymous No.6370993]

>>6370992
Yas, Queen!

[Anonymous No.6371000]

>>6370900
>muh labour theory of value

nobody cares lol, an item's value is independent of the effort taken to produce it

[Anonymous No.6371004]

>>6370966
It's not generated from scratch but with a real painting. Two, there's nothing amazing about it. It's the typical doll-up look in chinese webtoon, and not even a particularly eye catching one. you can learn to paint it too with another drawing of its kind as a reference in a day if you are solid at rendering. I'm not saying it's ugly, and sure it is higher than a beg's level, but there's nothing to be "absolutely amazed about". That anon is most likely a highbeg at best if he felt that

[Anonymous No.6371013]

>>6370966
Its bad for a machine. Its like comparing deep blue as a machine to gary Kasparov.
It would be good if it was human but it isnt

[Anonymous No.6371014]

>>6371004
pyw

[Anonymous No.6371022]

>>6369967
God this is so fucking based. Fuck artists. AI will reign supreme.

[Anonymous No.6371023]

>>6371004
>>6371013
That's true. Especially from an artist's point of view as you are judging how the craft is made rather than the solely the product like how a consumer would.

[Anonymous No.6371031]

/ic/ doesn't buy 100% hand made clothes, why should i care if the art i see isn't 100% made by an artist?

[Anonymous No.6371033]

>>6370784

[Anonymous No.6371039]

>>6370811
You toolfags dont realize that the problem with AI art is that it is really easy to become professional, that it can mimic every artstyle in couple of months, and that you have little control over it.

Photography:
>Have to find irl good looking stuff to take photo of
>Professional photographer and retard normie takes different kinds of photos
>Only able to do hyperrealistic capture of reality at the moment

Ai art
>Basically anything you can describe with words
>Prompt engineers might have fun now, but there are already models that upgrade your prompt, analyzing what you wrote and then guessing what prompts will fit the best with it
>Right now you can still search for artefacts and for the generic NovelAI coloring, but it is already starting to pass the turing test on most of their images.As stated, it can mimic to some extent every artstyle, so it is not limited to one artstyle like photography is.

Also good for you for finding use in this tech, most people just use it to make Artists seethe, or to coom to their generic anime porn.

[Anonymous No.6371054]

>>6370602
NFTs burned and crashed only because they were useless and everyone except for these retards knew they were useless. Now this tech however is showing that it is able to actually do something.

[Anonymous No.6371057]

>>6370916
They made it by default. This means that Deviantart is basically the safest platform for artists, unironically.

[Anonymous No.6371069]

>>6370365
They fucking deleted it. Did anyone archive it?

[Anonymous No.6371075]

HOLY SHIT BROS WE DID IT

[Anonymous No.6371077]

>>6371075
Why you think this will stop people from training their AI?

[Anonymous No.6371078]

>>6370782
>>6370784
FUKKEN SAVED for great justice

[Anonymous No.6371079]

>>6371069
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p2R7f2ZGLYs

[Anonymous No.6371081]

>>6371077
It won't but its good to make our voice heard and further pushes a stigma against AI

[Anonymous No.6371084]

>>6371075
This is actually huge. Deviantart now became the safest place for artists.

>Must flag AI shit
>All the crap and art is automatically opt out of all future thrid party models as well as local DA model
>DA now has its own dataset used by them and them alone, meaning they will legally protect it from worse scums like LAION
>Finally worldwide seething after months of professional artists coping and ignoring this

[Anonymous No.6371088]

>>6371075
>posts ai art
>opt-out from their ai
Life is good

[Anonymous No.6371098]

>>6370805

>powerlevel

it's a fucking crutch.

[Anonymous No.6371102]

>>6371075
But they're still keeping the AI program on their site?

[Anonymous No.6371105]

>>6371057

I mean the data of any artist work shouldn't be in it in the first place. Clean database consist of only artist who consent to their work being trained on and Public Domain works only.

Not train on it first then make the artist to literally beg to have their work out of it.

[Anonymous No.6371124]

>>6371105
In the next version they will have all the people opt out, basically 99.9% of their userbase since they made opt-out as default. And since they never released their AI model as downlodable, the next version that gets retrained will not contain any of those opt-out pictures, and the users of it wont have any choice but to use the newest model that will be worse. Also, keep in mind DA is not Artstation. Midjurney is pile of garbage that cant do good pictures despite sourcing from the best art site out there. I tried that DA AI and it is really shitty, like Dall-e mini level of shitty. All it means now is that everyone on DA is now fully opt-out automatically for the future.

[Anonymous No.6371126]

>>6370552
Well no wonder ahahah
I guess because of the recession lately the massively bloated tech companies laid off their staffs so there's an influx of techbros refugees trying to bring their 'products' to customer segments that dont need/want their products.

[Anonymous No.6371135]

>>6370552
>>6371126
I think the proper term is "Techtard"

[Anonymous No.6371143]

>>6371075
> Put out the worst thing first
> Massive backlash
> "O-okay we'll put out the second worst thing!"
> Slightly less backlash
> "See? We listen to your feedback!"
Classic

[Anonymous No.6371159]

>>6371143
Shhh, DA retards deserve to have the illusion of bargain.

[Anonymous No.6371264]

>>6370656
Thanks for mentioning this, I was about to manually tag all of my shit.

[Anonymous No.6371323]

America is the worst

[Anonymous No.6371442]

>>6369967
>year 2022 of our Lord Jesus Christ
>still using DullardArt

[Anonymous No.6371500]

>>6370730
Oh, this can be useful.
Considering I have way too much pics of my own

[Anonymous No.6371511]

>>6370673
the models can be trained on anything
whatever style, whatever artist, given enough epochs the machine will do it better than you can do yourself

[Anonymous No.6371665]

>>6370805
>he had to use a machine to help him make already factory-line produced anime slop
good god, just give up lmao

[Anonymous No.6371674]

>>6370740
Where is your "art" tho? All I see is an AI-generated image.
Unless you're delusional enough to imply that this is your work.
You didn't create it you arrogant mediocre midwit cow.

[Anonymous No.6371690]

>>6371039
>Basically anything you can describe with words
>>6370237

[Anonymous No.6371703]

>>6371511
Then why can't it do hands and feet and full backgrounds in proper perspective?

[Anonymous No.6371805]

>>6370432
>>6370423
Cry about it. Then learn to code.

[Anonymous No.6371810]

>>6370658
>>6370558
Why seethe? I'm creative at my job and at zero threat from AI. If anything, I collaborate with it. Get with it or stay useless.

[Anonymous No.6371814]

>>6370698
>>6370699
>>6370799
Humorless faggots get the rope. Good luck with the job market, losers.

[Anonymous No.6371819]

>>6370865
Nice Marsey, dramachan.

[Anonymous No.6371822]

>>6371805
learn to rope, rdrama tranny

[Anonymous No.6371836]

>>6371822

[Anonymous No.6372782]

>>6371814
>rdrama troon expects people to laugh at leddit ""humor""