/aag/ -AI ART GENERAL

[Anonymous No.6291749]

>Local install
GPU: https://rentry.org/voldy | https://github.com/AbdBarho/stable-diffusion-webui-docker
CPU: http://rentry.org/cputard

>AMD GPU Guides
Native: https://rentry.org/sd-nativeisekaitoo
Docker: https://rentry.org/sdamd
Onnx: https://rentry.org/ayymd-stable-diffustion-v1_4-guide

>Cloud Hosted Install
Colab: https://colab.research.google.com/drive/1Iy-xW9t1-OQWhb0hNxueGij8phCyluOh
Paperspace: https://rentry.org/865dy

>SaaS Sites
txt2img: https://huggingface.co/spaces/stabilityai/stable-diffusion | https://beta.dreamstudio.ai | https://dezgo.com | (NSFW) https://pornpen.ai
img2img: https://huggingface.co/spaces/huggingface/diffuse-the-rest
inpainting: https://huggingface.co/spaces/fffiloni/stable-diffusion-inpainting | https://inpainter.vercel.app/paint

>Krita Plug-ins
https://github.com/sddebz/stable-diffusion-krita-plugin
https://www.flyingdog.de/sd/en

>Other Guides
Inpainting/Outpainting: https://rentry.org/drfar
Upscaling images: https://rentry.org/sdupscale
Textual inversion: https://rentry.org/textard

>In-Depth Usage Info
/g/ wiki: https://wiki.installgentoo.com/wiki/Stable_Diffusion
SD Akashic Records: https://github.com/Maks-s/sd-akashic

>Tools & Resources
Big index: https://pharmapsychotic.com/tools.html
Artist styles: https://rentry.org/artists_sd-v1-4 | https://www.urania.ai/top-sd-artists | https://sgreens.notion.site/sgreens/4ca6f4e229e24da6845b6d49e6b08ae7
Prompt sharing: https://lexica.art/ | https://krea.ai/
Dataset: https://rom1504.github.io/clip-retrieval/ | https://laion-aesthetic.datasette.io/laion-aesthetic-6pls/images

>Finetuned Models
https://rentry.org/yrpvv
https://github.com/eyriewow/merge-models

>Related
/h/ /sdhb/: >>>/h/stable
/vg/ /aids/: >>>/vg/aids

Official: discord.gg/stablediffusion
Previous: >>6286892

[Anonymous No.6291754]

>A collaborative baroque ink wash painting by HR Giger and Zdzisław Beksiński of a gold cyborg monster on a violet biomechanical background

[Anonymous No.6291759]

Art made by literal robots shouldn't be on /ic/.

[Anonymous No.6291766]

LONG LIVE EMAD

[Anonymous No.6291774]

>>6291759
yeah but it's inevitable that they'll keep shitting up the board, keeping them in this thread will at least contain some of them

[Anonymous No.6291783]

>>6291759
>Art made by literal robots shouldn't be on /ic/.

[Anonymous No.6291794]

>>6291783
fuck off to your containment board consoomtard
>>>/g/

[Anonymous No.6291800]

>>6291783
but pic related is you anon. we are the reactionaries

[Anonymous No.6291804]

>>6291783
Is that your face when you see emma watson bob and vegana

[Anonymous No.6291806]

>>6291759
Do you also think that guns kill people, not the person who pulls the trigger?

[Anonymous No.6291807]

>>6291806
>be american
>get shot

[Anonymous No.6291838]

>>6291759
Honestly you make an interesting point, because 100% of the AI art posted here, is not made by a human, and was instead made by a machine, it would technically count as "Do not claim authorship of works you did not create" and would therefore be against the rules.
https://www.4chan.org/rules#ic

I hope, the Jannies add a a rule that bans it, seeing the techies get assmad over it would be hilarious, but unfortunately I cannot see that happening, until then we'll just have to live with the 24-7 low quality AI spam. From people, who didn't even know our board existed, 3 months ago.

[Anonymous No.6291851]

>>6291774
Nice try shill.
This thread doesn't belong on /ic/, just like how threads about photography and 3D modeling don't belong on /ic/. Not all types of art belong on /ic/.

[Anonymous No.6291877]

All graphic design that relies purely on software rather than hand skill belongs to >>>/gd/

[Anonymous No.6291891]

AIbros, realistically how long do we have before the copyright troons strike us down?

[Anonymous No.6291895]

>>6291749
Dalle-2 mimicking paintings always looks so gross. It's the combination of grain and sharp gloopy "brushstokes". The fact someone looks at that and think it looks good... lmao

[Anonymous No.6291974]

>>6291891
not an AIfag but prob as soon as someone trys to blatantly sell copy written big industry stuff. Hell so how fucked up youtubes copyrights are for music
I don't particular care for AI except for the annoying spam but holy shit if you guys believe this will end copyright think again
>best thing to say for "AI" is to call it transformative or a kin to photoshop

[Anonymous No.6292297]

You can only visit three. What will your choice be?

[Anonymous No.6292299]

>AI generated image
>AI generated post
I should stop wasting their gray matter. These are tools of distraction set to alienate oneself

[Anonymous No.6292315]

>>6291759
everyone was always an artist, they just got the right tools now

[Anonymous No.6292319]

>>6292315
>tfw I've been prompting for 8 years but nobody cares about my work in the slightest because I let a computer do it all for me.

[Anonymous No.6292340]

>>6291806
guns are still aimed by a human hand and they don't just randomly decide to shoot at some different target on their own.

[Anonymous No.6292356]

>>6291877
design fulfills a function and solves a problem - generative stuff is not graphic design especially if its abstract or painterly.

face it these things created an entirely new, very accesible 'artform' overnight

[Anonymous No.6292361]

>>6292356
Photobashing existed since before you first came here tourist, and we don't host photobasbing generals either

[Anonymous No.6292363]

Accessible
Democratized
Safe and effective
By the people for the people
Not a single living artist in the dataset
Sirs i present to you AI

[Anonymous No.6292375]

[Anonymous No.6292387]

>>6292375
you know nigga not everyone in the world can afford the internet still

[Anonymous No.6292391]

>>6292297
kind of bizarre how there are so many images but its actually all practically the same woman with the same body type

[Anonymous No.6292393]

>>6292391
Um, sweaty, are you suggesting they arr rook same?

[Anonymous No.6292400]

Art is a quality of life thing. Ai images just make it so that you don't have to, for example, eat to gain nourishment. It's 'superior' yes but humans are enjoying themselves a lot less. Creating art and having it be part of an economic/public ecosystem is like enjoying your food. It's an important part of our world and human experience, and if AI gets to where it can generate wholesale plots without the needed training or do all of our works for us then we're losing something really enjoyable.

Yes, the acts can still be performed, with little way to verify it's us and without the rewards. The game is still playable; the health bars just don't measure how many hits you've taken or given. It's like this.

[Anonymous No.6292442]

All fear the Prompt Artists. The new cutting edge modern artists, hated by all.
>I could do that!!
But you can't.

[Anonymous No.6292494]

>>6292442
wtf is it, even

[Anonymous No.6292495]

>>6292442
it's like this image is trying to create a scene but the more i look at it the less anything actually makes sense.

[Anonymous No.6292505]

>>6291759
Cope and seethe

[Anonymous No.6292512]

>>6292494
Pretty obviously a bunch of cars that are sitting in a room, cyberpunk art by James Gilleard, cgsociety, retrofuturism, sci-fi, greeble, sketchfab

[Anonymous No.6292513]

>>6292400
>you will eat the bugs
>you will own nothing
>you will be happy

try to be more subtle next time globohomo cocksucker

[Anonymous No.6292530]

>>6291759
Surely jannies will do something right? Otherwise the line is blurred and we can post shifty memes or scat and claim its "art"

[Anonymous No.6292536]

>>6292530
Jannies only go after jailbait, feel free to flood the catalog with infinite AI imagedumps (as long as you say you prompted it), 4chan was long overrun by bots to keep the poster count up artificially

[Anonymous No.6292764]

Started playing with this a few days ago and I'm in awe of this tech.

[Anonymous No.6292846]

>>6291806
in this case it's both the gun and the person killing people
fuck off shitty hand pajeet, there's already a containment board for you
>>>/g/

[Anonymous No.6292848]

>>6292764
This has to be a bot, you all sound fucking identical

[Anonymous No.6292860]

>>6292846
>a containment board for you
on even on /g/ are the ai pajeets welcome, all ai shitters are universally seen as mere insects

[Anonymous No.6292888]

Parasites.

[Anonymous No.6292916]

If I could draw this well I would, but I can't, so I proompt

[Anonymous No.6292928]

>>6291749
THIS IS NOW A /g/ BOARD!
THERE ARE CURRENTLY 14 AI THREADS UP ON /ic/!
BUMP! LOOK AT THIS AMAZING AI ART I FOUND!

14!

FOURTEEN!

XIV!

十四!

I HAVE REPORTED ALL OF THEM, YET JANNIES DO NOTHING ABOUT IT!
ONLY WHEN THERE ARE 20+, THEY DELETE ONE OR TWO TO PRETEND THEY'RE WORKING!

>>6292878
>>6292843
>>6292660
>>6291749
>>6291690
>>6291073
>>6290073
>>6289391
>>6289237
>>6289199
>>6289098
>>6286753
>>6278246
>>6273432

[Anonymous No.6292940]

I feel bad for regular /ic/fags having their board so shit up, but this reminds me of photography. Photography shitters were like "look at me I can make a realistic picture by pressing a button". But most photographs were artistically shit. Now it's "look at me I can make a picture by typing words" but once again most pictures are artistically shit. Photography and AI help produce certain things easily, but ultimately being an artist isn't the technique, it's in what guides it, and both photography shitters and AI shitters are more limited due to have less control than drawfags over the image they produce.

I'm still gonna proompt though, but just like photography it will remain pretty much a non-art.

[Anonymous No.6292964]

>>6292940
It reminds me more of the 3D gold rush in the early 90s when everyone with an Amiga rendered floating golden face masks in nebulas while pretending to be "artists". Which lasted until real artists stepped in and blew everyone else's efforts out of the water.
A lot of people posting half-assed "AI art" not realizing how much they are embarrassing themselves.

[Anonymous No.6292976]

>>6292964
True, but you're saying that AI "art" can become real art like 3D CGI art? I think that at the highest levels it could be true (let's say high effort well controlled inpainted composition), but low effort mid reward AI is a thing whereas the same wasn't true with 3D, unless you count the easy "make your own landscape in 10 clicks" programs like Bryce 3D.

I think it might come down to what AI devs do. As long as it's all "type some words and a picture comes out and if you want to fix it well tough luck", but if they give us an editor to edit the compositing steps (because basically AI is like "is this a nipple? this looks like a nipple so I'm gonna accentuate it as a nipple") and give us detailed control over the decisions that define the composition then that could work as a close analogue to 3D.

In the meantime I think that while the pictures produced by AI fall short, they can be a good source of inspiration for ideas or design, because unlike an image editor or 3d editor which don't give you much to inspire you AI pretty much brings up its own ideas and designs (like you type 3 words to vaguely describe clothes and it gives you an elaborate costume design). It's pretty much the perfect generator of ideas, you only need a very vague idea of what you and it just suggests things. Then you can be inspired to draw something the traditional way.

[Anonymous No.6292977]

>>6292940
I think it's different. Photography still requires artistic intent. AI shit is more like telling a photographer to go out and take some pictures of stuff for you, and then digging through his SD card when he gets back to pick your favorite and post online for asspats.

It's a really cool tool to play with, but it was rapidly ruined by retards who don't seem to realize that talent and artistic skills aren't just innate qualities that people have from birth.

[Anonymous No.6292983]

>>6292976
>but if they give us an editor to edit the compositing steps (because basically AI is like "is this a nipple? this looks like a nipple so I'm gonna accentuate it as a nipple") and give us detailed control over the decisions that define the composition then that could work as a close analogue to 3D.
There's an editor, it's called Photoshop.

[Anonymous No.6292989]

>>6292976
>can be a good source of inspiration for ideas or design
You really think that randomly put together and selected by tasteless uneducated larper is going to be inspirational just because he gasped once saw the image? I saw guys trying to poop something on /fa/, they've got btfo instantly

[Anonymous No.6293015]

>>6292977
>Photography still requires artistic intent
I don't think it's that different if you look at basic photography shitters, like >>>/p/. Like people who go out in the streets, shoot awkward sudden portraits of random people while tilting their camera, then make it black and white and add grain to make it more artsy. This or the "I took a picture of a random door" shitters are those on the same level as the AI shitters who make prompts like "Emma Watson ((((((enormous boobs)))))) naked doggystyle by greg rutkowski". And even if you look at the most expensive photographs you'll find that they're artistically utter shite, and yeah there's an element of money laundering but the artistic intent is still pretty minimal. It's another matter if we're talking about studio photography where everything is tightly controlled, but then that's arguably beyond mere photography.

>>6292983
That's a post-hoc raster editor, we'd need something to edit what goes into the AI picture before it gets done, as in "put face here, make eyeballs point there, make skin this shiny". We'd rarely know how to fix a mangled hand in Photoshop keeping in the same style.

>>6292989
Inspiration can work in funny ways, you can draw a blank because you have nothing to start from but then you see something that evokes a whole bunch of concepts. You might see an AI pic and maybe the face will inspire you something, or the shading, the overall colour palette, the background, the fabric or textures, It just takes a spark. Going through /ic/ most of the drawings really lack in inspiration, a lot of it is "I drew something that's just like the cartoons I watch", which might be decent for technique practice, but lacking as art.

Put another way, for most people inspiration from nothing, it's triggered by external stimuli. So your inspiration can come your Japanese cartoons like everybody else, or maybe it can come from something that generates sources of inspiration from whatever you vaguely have in mind

[Anonymous No.6293024]

>>6293015
>Inspiration can work in funny ways
but taste don't, shit images - shit taste - shit art, also inspiration is not looking over a shitton of images and trying to figure out from them, whatever is the shit you smoking - ai is dead end

[Anonymous No.6293032]

>>6292848
nope, though I could understand your concern, seeing what AIs are capable of now

[Anonymous No.6293066]

>>6292916
was this your prompt:
generic beautiful woman, wearing a crown-looking thing made from yellow roof shingles, brown hat-thing that melts with her hair, ((((really thick neck))), absolutely soulless look in her eyes, ((((like she's been lobotomized)))), mutated hand, nonsensical clothing, tastless, cheap airbrushed look, background that looks like a vomit-covered photographer's backdrop, nonsensical details, ((((gaudy)))), hideous, trending on artstation 4k by greg ratkowsky and a bunch of actually good artists, please make it good stable diffusion, i'm begging you.

[Anonymous No.6293088]

>>6292964
holy shit that's awesome and 100% absolutely has more soul than ai art

[Anonymous No.6293093]

>>6293024
Well then look at it another way, lots of people who draw people use reference photographs, quite often shitty ones, like the ones in the stock photography section of deviantart. AI can give you more references that are easily obtainable and tweakable to use as it can make interesting faces among other things (probably best to avoid AI images to get correct body proportions for now though).
>nooo it's shit everything is shit nothing good can ever come out of AI because... it just can't
oh ok
>also inspiration is not
inspiration is whatever inspires you to create something. The more inspired people are the most easily inspired. Looking at what /ic/ does I'm not sure many people here know what inspiration is, yet when it comes to AI you all talk like hot shots who are too good to let the computer give them ideas.

>>6293066
lmao, imagine typing all of this out of sheer AI butthurt

[Anonymous No.6293101]

/ic/ doesn't understand the AI-fag. They criticise us as wannabe artists. We're not artists, we don't want to be artists, we're patrons, the AI is the artist, we're the patron who enjoys the result.

[Anonymous No.6293135]

>>6293093
>>6293066

Honestly, it was pretty fun to type out, good exercise to analyse what's wrong with it. Picrel is what that prompt actually produces.

[Anonymous No.6293149]

>>6292940
>but just like photography it will remain pretty much a non-art.
photography IS art nigga, stop trying to gatekeep the word and learn to enjoy shit people create
also post some good twitter accs that post cool ai art, idc you can shill yourself

[Anonymous No.6293192]

>/ic/ jannies nuke my threads
>they let this AI shit stay up
Jannies are stupid

[Anonymous No.6293223]

>Dalle inspire me!

[Anonymous No.6293362]

>>6293101
true

[Anonymous No.6293372]

what's the name of that sotuh korean company that's trying to automate webtoons? I remember that it was also funded by the korean government

[Anonymous No.6293385]

>>6293101
>Look, reddit, at what *I* made with the AI!
Then stop saying shit like this

[Anonymous No.6293386]

>>6293372
They already may as well have, they all look the fucking same.

[Anonymous No.6293401]

>>6293101
>We're not artists, we don't want to be artists, we're patrons, the AI is the artist, we're the patron who enjoys the result.
no aifags ever talk about it this way, you are making shit up

[Anonymous No.6293405]

>>6293101
the ai-fag is nothing but a filthy consoomer

[Anonymous No.6294333]

so how does /ic/ feel about some coomer dev's AI being better at drawing art than 99% of you

[Anonymous No.6294335]

>>6294333
I mean people have made better stuff with lower drawing skills like one punch man
>then again that would require fa/g/s to actually think about what they're doing instead of throwing shit on the wall

[Anonymous No.6294344]

>>6294333
No different than x artist being better than me. I can draw hands and feet though, so I feel superior to ai for now.

[Anonymous No.6294352]

>>6293101
>If I pretend I'm not a smug asshole, flooding ic with ai art as an attempt to demoralize young artists, maybe they will stop calling me names
Would you kindly do the needful

[Anonymous No.6294378]

>>6294352
>demoralize young artists
more like giving egotistic attention whores a reality check. unless you're at the top 5% of artists, you're completely disposable now, and it's only gonna get worse as this tech improves

[Anonymous No.6294384]

>>6294378
>Attention whores on an anonymous board
Take your shitty opinions to twitter

[Anonymous No.6294387]

>>6294378
This
renderfags, backgroundshitters and conceptards are utterly obsolete now
in a few months, unless you already have 100k followers meaning you scrape by with branding alone, no one's gonna bother with your /beg/ or even /int/ 'art'.
Just look at how fast silicon intelligence has advanced - a few months ago it could only do random color blobs.

[Anonymous No.6294399]

>>6294387
>Just look at how fast silicon intelligence has advanced - a few months ago it could only do random color blobs.

[Anonymous No.6294403]

>>6294387
Seconding this.
In two weeks ai will be doing hands and feet, if you though you were safe, think again. Praise lord Emad

[Anonymous No.6294438]

I'm banned from /g/ for shitposting, am I really stuck with you niggers right now?

[Anonymous No.6295478]

[Anonymous No.6295499]

>>6291774
Shut your faggot shill mouth like there still arent 8 other AI threads shilling your piece of garbage software

[Anonymous No.6295500]

>>6294438
No get the fuck out, you arent welcome here

[Anonymous No.6295501]

>>6291749
I don't come here for two weeks and there is now an AI General, crazy how things change fast.

[Anonymous No.6295503]

>>6291838
Its not the "machines" artwork either. Its literal photobashing software. The art straight up belongs to another human, now all the fags get to spend even less effort than tracing yet now they pretend like they are participating in the creative process

[Anonymous No.6295516]

[Anonymous No.6295554]

>>6295503
Artists git gud by copying and using reference. AI applies the same process but you get the results directly from digging inside its mind.

[Anonymous No.6295555]

>>6295501
more like spam general

[Anonymous No.6295557]

>>6295554
>When I use google images, I'm probing the mind of the google.
It's basically an interpolative google image search.

[Anonymous No.6295558]

>>6295554
>applies the same process
>it tries to draw a signature because it cannot even comprehend what a signature is in the first place

[Anonymous No.6295567]

>>6295516
seeing people unironically liking highly rendered distubring shit like this made me view humanity in a different like. it made me realize half of humanity if not more are actually demented or possessed by some demonic forces. not just because it's "ugly" in fact that's not the worst crime here. but they like this uncanny lifeless weird shit. it's like someone entering a room full of rotting, contorted and dismembered corpses and calling it beautiful. it's like viewing the world through the characters from House of 1000 Corpses, or someone who has been lobotomized and stripped of all emotions. it's an uncanny aspect of its own, like I've just entered the twilight zone.

[Anonymous No.6295573]

>>6295516
seeing people unironically liking highly rendered distubring shit like this made me view humanity in a different way. it made me realize half of humanity if not more are actually demented or possessed by some sort of demonic forces. not just because it's "ugly" in fact that's not the worst crime here. but they like this uncanny lifeless weird shit. it's like someone entering a room full of rotting, contorted and dismembered corpses and calling it beautiful. it's like viewing the world through the characters from House of 1000 Corpses, or someone who has been lobotomized and stripped of all emotions. it's an uncanny aspect of its own, like I've just entered the twilight zone.

[Anonymous No.6295595]

>>6295573

[Anonymous No.6295610]

>>6295595
the monkey coomer felt attacked. should you even be called a human?

[Anonymous No.6295612]

>>6295610
you're projecting

[Anonymous No.6295620]

>>6295557
Google images, pinterest, etc. is how artists receive inspiration and find reference. With AI you're essentially eliminating the drawing stage and go straight to the conceptualized image stage.

[Anonymous No.6295634]

>>6295612
you're a louse

[Anonymous No.6295640]

>>6295634
I'm generating funny images with my GPU because I have no trouble accepting reality for what it is

[Anonymous No.6295646]

>>6295620
But when an artist uses reference, it is filtered through that artists sensibility, their soul. "AI applies the same process" is bullshit and you know it.

[Anonymous No.6295647]

>>6295595
The fedoras are the ones who love AI art you retard.

[Anonymous No.6295687]

[Anonymous No.6295693]

>>6291749
>Krita Plug-ins, https://www.flyingdog.de/sd/en, Google Colab
>2. Add Model as SD model file as "model.ckpt" in main Google Drive folder
I don't get this step

[Anonymous No.6295723]

>>6295693
>>>/g/ you fucking parasite. ask those subhumans

[Anonymous No.6295773]

[Anonymous No.6295831]

i was trying to make a cool metal gear rising-esque character, but the ai just cant draw a man holding a sword for some reason. ran out of free renders on midjourney

[Anonymous No.6295886]

>>6295501
it's more of a containment thread tbf

[Anonymous No.6295942]

I'm a win7 purist, can I run Stable Diffusion?

[Anonymous No.6296115]

>>6292442
no one will stand and stare at that and take in the details because there are none. u will look at it for 3 seconds and see its all mush

[Anonymous No.6296291]

>>6295831
Cool

[Anonymous No.6296294]

>>6295831
>boss battle cutscene
>robot walking towards you
>two swords come out
>boss title comes out with a lightning strike
>lightning strike takes the shape of a letter in the boss' name

[Anonymous No.6296326]

>>6295773
The heads being cut off like simply ruins it. Doesn't seem to bother normies though.

[Anonymous No.6296395]

>>6291754
>>6291749
Hey computer, make an artwork >>>in the style of<<<

What was that about ai art taking over real art again?

[Anonymous No.6296397]

>>6291749

[Anonymous No.6296503]

>>6293101
I bet you have onlyfans account

[Anonymous No.6296505]

>>6296326
It's one of the things that are so easy to fix even with the default tools the software gives you (outpainting) but these people just don't bother

[Anonymous No.6297227]

I've got GeForce RTX 2070 but when I run webui it says in cmd Torch isn't able to use the GPU. Is that not enough?

[Anonymous No.6297333]

>>6291895

[Anonymous No.6297337]

[Anonymous No.6297340]

[Anonymous No.6297345]

so it can make perfect furry shit now?

[Anonymous No.6297346]

[Anonymous No.6297368]

>>6297345
hnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnngggggg

[Anonymous No.6297503]

>>6291759
stop using photoshop then

[Anonymous No.6297510]

[Anonymous No.6297532]

>>6292315
Jesus.. what a shit take.

[Anonymous No.6297533]

>>6292442
Uh.. yes I can ty.

[Anonymous No.6297537]

>>6291838
They're just trying to trick you into advocating for robo rights so fuckable androids don't become a thing. That's roborape.

[Anonymous No.6297542]

>>6292393
But ehy ARR rook same!!

[Anonymous No.6297547]

>>6292916
>If I could draw this well I would, but I can't, so I proompt
You very easily could draw this well, anon.

[Anonymous No.6297551]

>>6297345
yes but you can't post furry smut here.
The furry models are probably the best tuned models on the internet at the moment.

[Anonymous No.6297925]

>>6292297
If you really wanted to ruin the thread you would have put numbers on them and said roll

[Anonymous No.6297930]

>>6295646
the soul isn’t real stop coping. Like it or not the entire human brain will be simulated eventually. They’ve just gone straight to the important part. The soul is the flaws. Just because they didn’t dive directly into simulating the flaws of the mind and body don’t think they won’t. They are simulating learning and creation. It just hasn’t got as far as you’re talking yet

[Anonymous No.6297934]

>>6297227
I’ve got a 1070 and like 3000 images at this point after a few days

[Anonymous No.6297975]

If the other AI thread just got deleted then this shit should get deleted too

[Anonymous No.6297976]

[Anonymous No.6297978]

>>6297975
It can stay as a containment thread I guess.
Also it's pretty funny coming here and seeing shills embarassing themselves.

[Anonymous No.6297982]

>>6297978
It shouldn’t be allowed even as a containment thread. It’s like photography or VFX. Yeah sure it’s “art”, just not the kind of art that this board is about.

[Anonymous No.6297983]

>>6293066
kek

[Anonymous No.6297986]

>>6293101
It's also kind of funny how starved of real art people are now a days that as soon as something moderately replicates the masters, people flock to a machine rather than the hack artists who have been flooding the market with Calarts bullshit at worst and concept art sketches at best
Everyone here was so focused on skill that they forgot vision. As soon as the waters rises most modern artists will be swept away. Leaving only people who are actually creative enough to innovate and survive.
>Bros look at this butt I spent an hour rendering
>Bros I grinded fundies for years so I can recreate a photorealistic arm
>Bros I have a Shexyo style mixed with a Frank Cho flare
LMAO
Everyone had years to figure themselves out, corner a niche, or garner a style and now they are going to suffer for it.

[Anonymous No.6297990]

>>6297930
>the soul isn’t real

[Anonymous No.6297993]

>>6297982
You underestimate how much work goes into this.
Inpainting and some people fix things by hand, or they paint something and then use AI to touch up a few fine details.
Sure you can sometimes generate something just from text and it looks good, but also generic without more work.
It's a tool. If you ban AI art you might as well ban photoshop and using the computer at all.
If you're not painting by hand you're making real art!

[Anonymous No.6298003]

>>6297993
>AI art is super easy
>AI art is actually hard
So what is it?

[Anonymous No.6298005]

>>6298003
>So what is it?
Just like drawing, it depends on your IQ.

[Anonymous No.6298007]

>>6297986
Literally nobody considers calarts to be art. It’s a goofy cartoon style. You don’t see a lot of people prompting Disney either except to make porn of the characters

[Anonymous No.6298016]

There's a special place in hell reserved for the ignorant and dishonest.

[Anonymous No.6298036]

>>6297930
>the soul isn’t real stop coping
an NPC like you would say that. a being that cannot see the color red has no concept of the color red.

[Anonymous No.6298037]

>>6294333
It's just pretty pictures. I'm waiting for the mad man who can make an AI waifu that has an actual character to them.lile the kind that has people make fan art of them.

[Anonymous No.6298049]

>>6298036
Why are artists clearly so scared and seething about AI if le soul can’t be replicated? Shouldn’t you just have full faith that god won’t allow robots to take your job? Or would that just be “one of gods trials”. Do you unironically believe in ghosts?

[Anonymous No.6298073]

>>6298049
No one who knows their shit is scared of AI replacing artists. There's /beg/ doomposting and nondrawing pre-/beg/ demoralization attempts, but fundamentally AI image generators are just a niftier pinterest. Decent AI results still require basic artistic knowledge, and the polishing of AI drawing tools like img2img will bury any arguments directed against artists in the future. There's more serious things to worry about like excess in easily available hedonism dumbing down societies and turning people en masse into thoughtless bots at best and manipulative sociopaths at worst, which AI will have a hand in but otherwise has been happening even before AI entered the scene.

[Anonymous No.6298096]

>>6298073
>basic artistic knowledge
that’s exactly the point, basic. Art just became immeasurably more accessible. It’s not the end of days but art was hardly a profitable field as it is. This is to art what torrenting, streaming and widespread access to DAWs was to music. Oversaturation is an understatement. Learning to use SD and the level of technical skills required to make phenomenal art is laughably easy comparatively. Not only that but these new artists will become actual artists and develop their skills. I’m glad but I’m glad I don’t depend on art for money because those dudes are f u c k e d

[Anonymous No.6298105]

>>6298096
Man I'm glad you decided to come back with your retarded takes, I was missing you the last few days.

[Anonymous No.6298110]

>>6298105
meds, I used to browse /ic/ years ago but left because it’s full of cucks. Came back to discuss the biggest game changer in art since digital. If anything there are more cucks here than when I left lmao.

[Anonymous No.6298113]

>>6298110
Dude not only the IP counter didn't increase when you started posting. But it's obvious it's the same guy. Your style of posting is always the same, you have a complete lack of understanding of both AI and Art. And when you get called out you always call schizo or meds. But don't worry I pretty much read this threads just to laugh at your stupidity.

[Anonymous No.6298129]

>>6297993
>Inpainting and some people fix things by hand, or they paint something and then use AI to touch up a few fine details.
you are literally describing photography
where the fuck do you think inpainting comes from?

[Anonymous No.6298141]

>>6291749
I don't imagine this shit will remain legal in the long term aifaggots think only in accelerationist terms so they cant understand that building a future on a foundation of abuse and halftruths can only create a world of misery they think gorvernments will start handing out ubi(gibs) which is less likely than jesus himself coming down to piss on the oval office t

[Anonymous No.6298146]

>>6298141
>he doesn't know abou the Jesus incident

[Anonymous No.6298152]

>>6298113
m80 it’s not me, you’re being paranoid but go off. If thinking every cunt you disagree with is one guy makes you feel better then I’m glad we had this exchange. feel better pal

[Anonymous No.6298174]

>feel stuck in the mud with my sketchbook
>go to craiyon ai
>type in prompts for different flavor anime girls
>draw results as best as possible
>output increases tenfold
Than you based bots I might actually fill the book before January

[Anonymous No.6298181]

>>6292976
>>6295687
>>6297551


Which generators would you recomend I use for something of similar quality to these? And how easy are they to use or install?

[Anonymous No.6298204]

Starving artists rejoice! The A.I. revolution has burned and looted the old capital. The power and ease of use of A.I. has won. You can now make A.I. movies : https://makeavideo.studio/

Art has taken a quantum leap.

[Anonymous No.6298205]

Is there an AI art generator of producing NSFW art ?

[Anonymous No.6298209]

>>6298204
>shilling for Zuckenberg
>for free

[Anonymous No.6298213]

>>6298209
>>for free
top keke

[Anonymous No.6298217]

>>6298209
https://makeavideo.studio/
And next week someone will come up with something better. Like chess, humans used to be the best. Now computers are.

You'll hook your skull up to some brain sensors and think through a work of art and it will be rendered.

[Anonymous No.6298220]

>>6298217
>next week
Dude that's quite literally only a paper.
It's pretty much stuff to trick investors.
>You'll hook your skull up to some brain sensors and think through a work of art and it will be rendered.
Did I end up in Reddit?

[Anonymous No.6298237]

Anyone know how to fix this? P-please help, I want to make my obscure fetish art.

[Anonymous No.6298240]

[Anonymous No.6298241]

>>6297993
1) Lmao.
2) I don’t care how much work goes into it. Photography and 3D modeling take a lot of work. They also have their own boards separate from /ic/.

[Anonymous No.6298245]

>>6298237
Install proper CUDA driver for your GPU.

[Anonymous No.6298246]

>>6298245
Cuda toolkit yeah? I did that, nothing.

[Anonymous No.6298258]

Make sure cuda driver is intalled. It is not a "toolkit". Got to GPU manufacturers website for help installing or updating to latest drivers. also, try adding the --skip-torch-cuda-test parameter to your command.

[Anonymous No.6298259]

[Anonymous No.6298261]

Any gimp plugins?

[Anonymous No.6298262]

It's over for artists, isn't it?

[Anonymous No.6298264]

>>6298240
>>6298262
kek

[Anonymous No.6298266]

>>6298258
>cuda driver
I can't find any mention of cuda besides the toolkit. I should already have updated drivers for my RTX 2070

[Anonymous No.6298267]

>>6298262
>It's over for artists, isn't it?
Good artists will learn the new methods.

[Anonymous No.6298271]

>>6298205
Bump>>6298209

[Anonymous No.6298272]

>>6298266
>RTX 2070
Press Windows + X and select Device Manager to open Device Manager on your Windows computer. Expand Display adapters, right-click your Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 graphics card, and select Update driver. Then select Search automatically for updated driver software. It will automatically download and install the latest driver for your PC.

Also check by doing this:

python -c 'import torch; print(torch.cuda.is_available())'

[Anonymous No.6298276]

>>6298271
Stable diffusion NSFW : https://www.mage.space/
Unstable diffusion: https://unstablediffusion.net/

pic prompt is "naked man and woman embracing"

[Anonymous No.6298278]

AI can now accurately illustrate stories in anime style

[Anonymous No.6298282]

as you can see early on people will straight repost since "the original poster didn't draw it" leading to dislinked commments without some kind of central AIbooru, hopefully one day we'll have some kind of metadata system including software version and parameters

[Anonymous No.6298288]

>>6298282
>central AIbooru
The central albooru will solve the problem.

[Anonymous No.6298301]

>>6298217
>You'll hook your skull up to some brain sensors and think through a work of art and it will be rendered.
If that was possible, all non-artists could produce would be trash.

You can already use a pencil to materialize what's in your head. If your drawing looks like shit, that's because what you have in your head is shit too.

[Anonymous No.6298302]

>>6298301
A.I. is the new pencil.

[Anonymous No.6298306]

>>6298302
No. With a pencil you have to use your brain, and at least there is a possibility that what comes out actually looks good.

[Anonymous No.6298333]

the more AI "art" I see, the more I like pieces made by humans. This pathetic shilling campaing has failed

[Anonymous No.6298351]

>>6298272
Thank you anon, I'm not sure why the drivers weren't already up to date, if not for you I would have given up entirely I think. Thank you.

[Anonymous No.6298353]

>>6298351
Have fun!

[Anonymous No.6298354]

>>6298353
My first waifu loosely based on a sketch I made years ago. She's perfect.

[Anonymous No.6298368]

>>6298306

[Anonymous No.6298375]

>>6298181
These were all done with stable diffusion. If you're after furshit specifically then you'll wanna go to >>>/trash/sdg and pull the models from there.

[Anonymous No.6298379]

I keep getting massive breasts when I type a small breast prompt, is waifudiffusion baised? Is it mocking flat chests?!

[Anonymous No.6298386]

Any tips on in-painting? Every time try it the ai completely changes the art outside of the black masked area.

[Anonymous No.6298508]

ai chads i kneel

[Anonymous No.6298509]

>>6298508
i for one welcome our skynet overlords

[Anonymous No.6298545]

>>6298509
Prompt?

[Anonymous No.6298555]

>>6298262
>that arm/elbow
>more generic sameface shit
how can you fucking render monkeys be so tasteless lmao

[Anonymous No.6298566]

>>6298096
>Not only that but these new artists will become actual artists and develop their skills.
lol, you are one deluded motherfucker

[Anonymous No.6298571]

>>6295640
you do it because you're a worthless skilless retard and nothing more than a consoomer for the rest of your life

[Anonymous No.6298579]

https://dreamfusion3d.github.io/
They just solved 3D

[Anonymous No.6298597]

>>6297510
What model?

[Anonymous No.6298599]

>>6298597
Looks like img2img

[Anonymous No.6298600]

>>6298599
img2img isn't a model, that's a feature. It still needs a model to generate the picture from the noise pattern of the image and the prompt.

[Anonymous No.6298605]

Girls are cute.

[Anonymous No.6298615]

>>6298262
yes, absolutely

[Anonymous No.6298621]

Google, Microsoft, Meta, Apple own the future of art.

[Anonymous No.6298629]

>>6298508
>>6298509
>Type large breasts in prompt
>AI immediately goes for anime tier tits

wtf kind of data is the AI being feed on???

[Anonymous No.6298632]

>>6298629
We should have cleansed the world of inflation fetishists and their ilk long before we made A.I. generators.

[Anonymous No.6298653]

>>6298621
not only art.
This is the real problem.

[Anonymous No.6298666]

>>6298509
>AI watermark

[Anonymous No.6298667]

>>6298629
I think that guy specifically is using the waifu model which trained on Gelbooru and anime tits

[Anonymous No.6298775]

>>6298509
Pretty sure that's some form of demonic language bottom left.

[Anonymous No.6298801]

>go to text-speech.net
>copy + paste every shill post
>select "Madhur Online (Natural) - Hindi (India) (hi-IN)"
>press play
>enjoy my beer

[Anonymous No.6299094]

>>6292297
arr rook same

[Anonymous No.6299127]

[Anonymous No.6299129]

[Anonymous No.6299189]

>>6297986
>real art

[Anonymous No.6299223]

[Anonymous No.6299240]

>>6299189
>posts cal arts

[Anonymous No.6299250]

>>6292940
>>6292976
What people are missing here is why art is created in the first place.
Yes, an AI can create a painting that looks appealing and technically impressive, but it cannot develop new rendering techniques or styles unless it is some rare and unintentional mistake.
AI by design does not make mistakes. If, for example, the "anime" aesthetic did not exist in our reality, an AI could never create it.
Art is created as a means of personal expression, which the AI is incapable of doing.
AI art is the art of the mindless postmodern consumer.

[Anonymous No.6299276]

With art creation becoming more accessible to the average person I can see more people taking an interest in art and actually wanting to learn how to draw manually thus creating a resurgence in traditional art the same way chess saw a resurgence despite AI "solving" it years ago.

[Anonymous No.6299279]

>>6299276
Shitposting aside, did chess really have a resurgence? I honestly didn't know if that's the case.

[Anonymous No.6299282]

>>6299279
It's become pretty big on twitch the last couple of years
https://www.chess.com/article/view/why-is-chess-so-popular-right-now

[Anonymous No.6299285]

>>6299276
Traditional art and art communities.
Good luck making a bot that can believably draw and communicate live on the go on places like flockdraw or aggie.io.

[Anonymous No.6299287]

i'm quite impressed by some of the visually engaging images ai comes up with, from a composition and design perspective

[Anonymous No.6299290]

>>6297930
>the soul isn’t real stop coping.

[Anonymous No.6299319]

What does it mean no kernel image is available for execution on the device?

[Anonymous No.6299379]

>>6298262
why is it always this style? is it people always using the same settings / prompt or what?

[Anonymous No.6299382]

>>6299287
almost like its using other people's composition and design, weird

[Anonymous No.6299395]

>>6299276
There are important differences between chess and art though.
Watching high level chess tournaments is 100% about the storylines and the spectacle. It doesn't matter that AI can play perfectly - you're there to watch the human players struggle and you want to see them win and lose and it's impossible for AI to provide a substitute for that. Chess is also very easy to jump into and have fun at a low level, so anyone who hears about chess on the news can go try it out right away.
Art is WAY more focused on the finished product than chess, for most purposes. Yes the process is important, yes the life of the artist is important, but at the end of the day for most commercial contexts, the client wants a piece that looks like X and if they get the desired output then they're not too concerned with how it was made. There's nothing in principle stopping AI from replicating that. It only needs to mimic the output, it doesn't need to mimic the performance.
If AI gets good enough then some artists might put more of a focus on livestreaming, to provide something that can be distinguished from pure black box AI output. But that will be a much smaller and more niche market than the existing commercial art market.

[Anonymous No.6299452]

>>6299287
I saw a cloud that looked like Godzilla, I was so impressed by natures ability to come up with compositions like that.

[Anonymous No.6299463]

You will never be a real artist
You will always be a talentless STEM bugman
All your AI’s good for is pilfering actual artwork, mangling it together and presenting as its own
Your uncanny generic blurry garbage will never pass as real art

[Anonymous No.6299467]

>>6299382
>almost like its using other people's composition and design, weird
i think for the composition it generates some random shapes based on the seed number, i don't think it directly lifts compositions from other people as such

[Anonymous No.6299472]

>>6299452
>I saw a cloud that looked like Godzilla, I was so impressed by natures ability to come up with compositions like that.
yes, that's along the lines i'm thinking, the clouds might have formed randomly to look like that but it takes a human to see it and take note of it, if you'd taken a photo of the clouds you could say the resulting image was both nature's and your creation by virtue of you choosing it specifically as being distinct and special over and above the other clouds in the sky that day

[Anonymous No.6299504]

>>6299250
>but it cannot develop new rendering techniques or styles
i'd say it seems to be capable of combining existing styles to create new styles, isn't that what people do mostly anyway?

[Anonymous No.6299543]

>>6299395
>Art is WAY more focused on the finished product than chess, for most purposes.
Art is also WAY more than just images.
And that's all AI art is — just images.

[Anonymous No.6299550]

>>6299395
>Art is WAY more focused on the finished product than chess, for most purposes.
Art is also WAY more than just images.
And that's all AI 'art' is — just images.

[Anonymous No.6299556]

>>6299467
it doesn't, it generates random noise based on the seed
then it performs a search of de-noising weights based on the prompt keywords in the condensed (latent) weight space
since the condensed space is lossy, we can't know how much of the composition is straight up lifted from the original pieces

[Anonymous No.6299652]

>>6299556
Well of the thousands and thousands of pictures created in yet to see a single person say they recognise something from somewhere else so does it really matter? Rip someone off by hand and watch how quickly you get called out online.

[Anonymous No.6299656]

>>6299504
Usually yes, but AI is less spontaneous. It can only imitate, but it wont reach new conclusions unless by a mistake.
AI art can look nice, but comes of as strangely inauthentic (at least for me).
I've anticipated stable diffusion and got it the first day it became public, but I barely use it.
Making prompts takes no effort, so I don't get the same sanctification as from drawing something by myself.
I believe that AI art can be used for color study or potential inspiration, but that's about it.

[Anonymous No.6299703]

>>6299463
How/where would I go to make something like this? I keep seeing these Giuseppe Arcimboldo type memes and I want to know how to make my own! Do I really have to waste space on my SDD for a novelty app?

Also side note, half the links lead to 404.

[Anonymous No.6299705]

which AI is used to create images like this? i know >redditfrog but its the only example i have saved right now

[Anonymous No.6299758]

>>6299652
it happens, it's referred as 'over-fitting' and there are mitigations against it
but you can't never be sure you're not straight up lifting shit wholesale

[Anonymous No.6299768]

human artists BTFO

[Anonymous No.6299772]

>>6299768

[Anonymous No.6299808]

>>6299772
>man-made horrors beyond your comprehension

[Anonymous No.6299809]

5 threads on the front page are fucking AI. We need a containment thread.

[Anonymous No.6299818]

>>6299656
>It can only imitate
if that were true it wouldn't be such a threat

[Anonymous No.6299827]

>>6299809
…on every board
just make /ai/ fagjannies

[Anonymous No.6299830]

>>6299809
I want an AI animation thread but they keep deleting them, is it not a topic to discuss in a separate thread? meta just showed off "the impossible" and I want to bring fence sitters over to the side of artists, not corpos. They will take everything from you. Don't run and hide. fight.

[Anonymous No.6299833]

>>6299656
>AI is less spontaneous.
t. has never even tried it. This is the last thing I would say about SD

[Anonymous No.6299842]

>>6299705
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CqdsVVyTyIU

[Anonymous No.6299845]

>>6299833
>t. has never even tried it.
Dude, that Balloonhead is literally AI generated.

[Anonymous No.6299848]

>>6299395
Simple, turn art into a competitive sport

[Anonymous No.6299849]

>>6299845
And it is the result of over training on Magritte.

[Anonymous No.6299851]

>>6299845
>>6299849

[Anonymous No.6299853]

>>6299842
thanks anon

[Anonymous No.6299859]

>>6299849
It was actually based on Zdzisław Beksiński's style.
I've trained it mostly on Frazetta and Whelan.

[Anonymous No.6299860]

>>6299556
>then it performs a search of de-noising weights based on the prompt keywords
i don't think it's directly lifting compositions of existing works though, i can guess where the big white circle in >>6299287 comes from and it's not from a specific artwork which includes a fat man standing inside a big circle, you can see some small white circles in his eyes too, these are compositional elements but seemingly relating to a word in the prompt rather than a pre existing design, whatever it's doing it appears to be transformative enough to be creating something which is entirely new, in my opinion, more so than andy warhol making screen prints of campbell's soup cans for example, or roy lichtenstein directly copying existing comic strips and using projectors to paint them onto large canvases

[Anonymous No.6299866]

>>6299859
You can prompt what you will, but The AI will use whatever it has to build your image. in this case margrittes work was a good fit for an orange balloon head.

[Anonymous No.6299867]

>>6299849
i got nothing at all magritte like when i prompted 'balloon head' so i'm guessing there was something else in his prompt which resulted in a magritte looking image

[Anonymous No.6299868]

>>6299859
>I myself am stealing from Frazetta and Whelan to train my theft box

[Anonymous No.6299869]

>>6299868
not him but check out this monstrosity

[Anonymous No.6299873]

>>6299869
The future is bleak

[Anonymous No.6299874]

>>6299869
Okay, you've got me there.
Now, I'm obliged to post this abomination.
BEHOLD!

[Anonymous No.6299876]

>>6299874
that's nothing, look at my melon lord

[Anonymous No.6299880]

>>6299869
>Not Aoc
Worthless

[Anonymous No.6299881]

>>6299867
It was probably img2img with the Magritte as the input.
My result with that, and frazzetta and beksinski in the prompt.

[Anonymous No.6300007]

>>6299869
ronnie Coleman’s mom

[Anonymous No.6300069]

>>6299880
>Not Aoc
>Worthless

[Anonymous No.6300074]

>>6299880
aoc thick juicy latino booty shot (unrequested by myself but thoughtfully provided by the ai nonetheless)

[Anonymous No.6300075]

>>6299880
not quite sure what's going on here

[Anonymous No.6300077]

>>6299880
ai gone full retard now

[Anonymous No.6300078]

>>6300007
yes

[Anonymous No.6300079]

>>6292387
good. it's unfortunate that "people" like you can

[Anonymous No.6300080]

>>6298555
Congrats you discovered anime

[Anonymous No.6300103]

>>6300069
>>6300074
>>6300075
>>6300077
shameful wish I hadn't said anything

[Anonymous No.6300116]

>>6300077
Impressive, looks just like her.

[Anonymous No.6300137]

[Anonymous No.6300163]

Is this the thread where i can redeem my busty dark elf with short hair?

[Anonymous No.6300165]

>>6300163
Seconding this but also have her in a gangbang with orc warriors

[Anonymous No.6300166]

>>6300165
No. No gangbangs. I just want that image as a dark elf. Should be simple enough.

[Anonymous No.6300208]

[Anonymous No.6300210]

>>6300208
No.

[Anonymous No.6300240]

>>6300210

[Anonymous No.6300249]

[Anonymous No.6300267]

>>6300240
>>6300249
delete these

[Anonymous No.6300276]

>>6300163
>>6300267
Give me a sec. I'm not that guy or the other who does the original elves, but I'll give it a whirl

[Anonymous No.6300295]

>>6299833
You might be confusing surprise (or immediacy) for spontaneity.
That element of surprise is one of the reasons AI can be so addicting. The randomization is the hook. Refining your prompt gives some level of control, but there's still (currently) that element of getting lucky.
This is different from the spontaneity of drawing. As one masters their medium, impulses can lead to more experimentation. It's much like the jazz musician improvises once they master their instrument. It's also addictive, but also more enriching.

[Anonymous No.6300303]

>>6299830
You know I was just thinking, artists bitch about how AI is ripping their style, but AI right now trains on the work of artists not the artist themselves.
But what if if we could take the "essence" of a particular artist and basically concentrate that into an AI. Obviously this would require a neural interface or some means of flash copying an entire brain although both likely have fatal results for the og artist.
But think about it, and artist that died could still continue his work, hell even his own consciousness and personality could be preserved into an AI. People could sell and trade the AI models that were flashed from these artists.

[Anonymous No.6300437]

>>6300267
Dark elfs have white hair right?

[Anonymous No.6300446]

>>6300303
ah, so this timeline is going down the "hell on earth" route then. That tracks.

[Anonymous No.6300485]

this board is coping so fucking hard that they can't handle the most pressing topic in the art industry

pic related thread was deleted because I don't konw

[Anonymous No.6300489]

>>6300485
DO NOT DELETE THE THREAD MA'AM

DO NOT DELETE

[Anonymous No.6300491]

>>6300489
this board has that "don't look up" mentality about what's going on, people should be panicing because shit's actuallly going to change the whole industry fundamentally

[Anonymous No.6300492]

>>6300491
Stop spamming /ic/, faggot.

[Anonymous No.6300496]

I like AI art because its alot easier than photoshop

[Anonymous No.6300498]

>>6300492
I don't even frequent this board, it's insane how hard people want to avoid the topic, when it's obviously really fucking imporitant to what's going to happen to the whole industry, are people only avoiding the topic because they don't want to face the potential that most artists are going to be replaced, and I'm not talking about some high art oil painting but industry art, like patreon shit or video game conept art etc.

[Anonymous No.6300500]

>>6300498
Read on 5 stages of grief, forums didn't like people seeing discussion about whether digital art is art way back when

[Anonymous No.6300501]

>>6300500
I know, that's the first thing that pops into my mind but it's insane seeing a whole board being so agressive towards this shit when they should be taking it really seriously

[Anonymous No.6300505]

>>6300498
I see people avoid the topic here because most of the time they waste time arguing with a coomer spamming and idolizing AI generated crap with no idea of the consequences of this tech besides making him infinite nsfw

[Anonymous No.6300507]

>>6300505
coomer art is a huge part of the industry and how a large portion get into art in the first place, I know it has a stigma and isn't considered actual art by many or whatever but the reality is that a lot of people actuall don't give a fuck about anything other than being good at drawing coomer shit

[Anonymous No.6300511]

Cope.

[Anonymous No.6300523]

>>6300485
This actually puts pornography for debate more than AI creations. Because pornography is either a pseudo-art or the most utilitarian art form there is.
It's funny that most of /ic/'s userbase, driven by the lust for capital, has chosen to focus solely on it.
The age of AI will teach them the lesson they always deserved.

[Anonymous No.6300526]

>>6300523
most of the art industry is not art gallery painting stuff but meant for consumption

[Anonymous No.6300531]

>>6300498
Artists are bad at confrontation. Would rather dismiss AI and it's current flaws than consider taking up the real fight. If you do perceive it as a threat you are shouted down by other artists for being a doomer. Imagine if we united and fought back against the AI? meme it to death idk

[Anonymous No.6300532]

>>6300507
I don't give a damn about the question of profits, self publishing art was never very profitable. What I'm saying is that most coomers are now spiteful of human artists and side with AI in these threads with bait OPs like this thread's and provocations carrying off to even spamming other boards >>/pol/397728344 like go to the archive and search "AI art" you will see 5 OPs shitting on artists the AI drones made there.

These consoomers are short sighted because they're paving the road for a hell where everything from online discussions to human expression can be completely generated by AI pass off as a real people and no one has the drive to do anything. /ic/ actually did discuss and dug up lot of of information on the intent of the AI devs, but there is no discussion to be held with the misanthropes who believe human brain is just a "flesh machine" to be automated.

[Anonymous No.6300534]

>>6300507
I don't give a damn about the question of profits, self publishing art was never very profitable. What I'm saying is that most coomers are now spiteful of human artists and side with AI in these threads with bait OPs like this thread's and provocations carrying off to even spamming other boards >>>/pol/397728344 like go to the archive and search "AI art" you will see 5 OPs shitting on artists the AI drones made there.

These consoomers are short sighted because they're paving the road for a hell where everything from online discussions to human expression can be completely generated by AI pass off as a real people and no one has the drive to do anything. /ic/ actually did discuss and dug up lot of of information on the intent of the AI devs, but there is no discussion to be held with the misanthropes who believe human brain is just a "flesh machine" to be automated.

[Anonymous No.6300537]

>>6300534
well coomer art is straightforwardl, it's not usually trying to be anything but arousing, which is why it's directly threatened by AI shit because coomer art doesn't need some deep meaning behind it so it's ideal for AI to generate

personally I don't think there's nothing patricularly wrong with aproaching art as a challenge to create the most beutiful shit you can

[Anonymous No.6300546]

>>6300526
Pornography is postmodern precisely because most of its viewers do not bother to study the creators involved or the production process behind it.
It is consumed at lightning speeds, to the point where even the most bland artistic intent is still goes over the heads of the target audience.

[Anonymous No.6300550]

>>6300546
it's not pretentious is another way to put it, it's just someone who wants to create the most nice looking engaging shit wihtout having to make it deep

[Anonymous No.6300558]

[Anonymous No.6300559]

>>6300558
what software do you use to generate this? is it really just stable diffusion with some waifu pack or something more powerful?

[Anonymous No.6300561]

>>6300534
Are these faggots actually praising a tool made by the same jews they were bashing non-stop for almost two years just because it lets them pump out endless trite garbage.

[Anonymous No.6300563]

>>6300561
some people droning around it is not very important compared to how this shit will develop and take over

[Anonymous No.6300564]

>>6300559
Gitgud promptlet

[Anonymous No.6300565]

>>6300564
I've only tried some furry models so far, I gotta get the waifu ones because they seem to generate nicer shit

[Anonymous No.6300571]

>>6300550
To some extent you are right. I always come to remember that Belladonna of Sadness film, a movie that was explicitly advertised as pornographic, but became debated later on by critics on whether it fits that category, because the conceptual and intellectually challenging writing was such a big part of its appeal.
However, this makes very little difference from the perspective of the actual viewer (especially in the modern sense), for whom pornography is just like junk food.

[Anonymous No.6300572]

>>6300571
yeah porn is meant to be consumed, but I don't it's that bad that some people want to make the most pleasing shit, they just look at art in a completely different way, not that they don't appriciate shit like technical skills and making engaging shit

[Anonymous No.6300575]

one of the oldest sculptures was coom shit to remind us we are just horny monkeys

[Anonymous No.6300581]

>>6300561
A large share of /pol/fags ironically believe the AI backed by UN and Starlink will free them from the shackles of globohomo. When its spread will without a shadow of doubt be used as the foremost motive to moderate the internet even more as to prevent bots from raiding tranny twitter accounts. That board has always been easily misled and subverted by shills though so it doesn't matter

[Anonymous No.6300602]

>>6300581
As an addendum, you have to keep in mind that people like them are almost entirely NEETs, the moment they're given enough distractions and toys they might as well forget about what political ideology they railed for and obsess over this world of endless consumption. AI has a never before seen potential of consumerist maximization by making the people who push the big generate button eternally excited for whatever it will show them next

[Anonymous No.6300603]

>>6300581
It's been like that for a long time. They dont even understand that any post about some eceleb like jordan peterson is astroturfing to get poltards to consoom whatever they're grifting. If moot never sold out we would have had "eceleb spam" as a global rule by now.

[Anonymous No.6300650]

>>6291759
All digital art is made by computers