[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports / report a bug ] [ 4plebs / archived.moe / rbt ]

2022-11: Warosu is now out of maintenance. Become a Patron!

/ic/ - Artwork/Critique


View post   
View page     

[ Toggle deleted replies ]
File: 1.43 MB, 1343x1140, Character_symbol_01_Large.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6289391 No.6289391 [Reply] [Original]

Hi, im sitting for an art test - designing sybols for poker machines, this is one symbol part of my art test - what do you think

>> No.6289403

>>6289391
What's your reference(s)?

>> No.6289407
File: 368 KB, 512x512, Canned_Ham_Chinese_empress_face_royal_83075fdb-1ede-4ca7-a876-133af38924d5.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6289407

>>6289403
a bunch of different stuff , first time using ai to assit,(picrel) ai ref to get the ball rolling

>> No.6289411

>>6289407
>using ai to assit
:facepalm: please leave

>> No.6289413

>>6289411
lol, it's a tool. look at my art compared to wath the pc shat out.

>> No.6289415

>>6289391
wow it looks great, good job anon!

>> No.6289418

>>6289415
thx!

>> No.6289421

>>6289415
>>6289418
meds

>> No.6289422

>>6289421
toxic

>> No.6289424

the gene is already out from the curry sirs

>> No.6289525

>>6289391
From the thumbnail, I thought it was a midjourney face. midjourney faces all share that characteristic lip/nose/eye ratio.

>> No.6289526
File: 316 KB, 463x557, 1646556144201.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6289526

Looks like generic AI art, but, since it's for a soulless scamming game, I don't see the issue.

If all you need are Photoshop retouching tips, go to >>>/gd/

>> No.6289527

>>6289525
>midjourney faces all share that characteristic lip/nose/eye ratio.

you mean how a face looks?

>> No.6289530

>>6289526
but its not generic ai art. i spent 12 hours + drawing this and painting it

>> No.6289533

>>6289530
and still looks like a generic Al stuff.
see the problem here?

>> No.6289537

>>6289533
yeah (you) can u even draw cunt lol

>> No.6289538

>>6289537
no, i just prompt

>> No.6289540
File: 269 KB, 720x404, download.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6289540

>>6289538

>> No.6289543
File: 144 KB, 1024x1024, 1 9wYsawK-sO7-VTgEl_q0gQ.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6289543

>>6289527
Don't be disingenuous. All female midjourney faces look related. Unless you really push the prompt away from it, but nobody seems to do it...

>> No.6289548

>>6289543
looks worlds apart from mine - but what ever bud

>> No.6289549

>>6289548
You might have Prosopagnosia

>> No.6289553

>>6289540
seen so much of it, yours looks like one of the generated shits from the thumbnail
maybe i should stop prompting

>> No.6289556

>>6289553
amaybe you should fucking neck ya self cunt and learn to draw and paint for 20 years before you give an opinon.

>> No.6289558
File: 53 KB, 862x485, 53f1b82772d4f8006f9f6a5f6be757b7.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6289558

>>6289391

Hi Anon,

It is with careful consideration that we have told the hiring manager to disqualify you because we don't use AI art in production. We feel that AI despite its capabilities cannot replace real human connections with the client. I'm sorry but you don't seem to fit the vision we in the company are trying to achieve. Good luck in your future endeavours in AI technology.

Sincerely,

Karen

>> No.6289560
File: 38 KB, 346x361, 1654994536920.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6289560

>>6289558
kekers

>> No.6289562

>>6289556
or maybe change your style a bit, so it doesn't look like a generated image
or the pose, idk
use your 20 years experience to avoid getting called Alfag you twat

>> No.6289563

>>6289556
nta, but chill bro. AI has poisoned your art. You are now wrestling with the sunk cost fallacy.

>> No.6289569
File: 1.12 MB, 1920x640, Untitled-1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6289569

>>6289563
because i used an ai as a tool to shit out an image for reference. origonal pic is 10% from ai ref 90% me.

Pic rel) examp of art

>> No.6289570
File: 269 KB, 1200x566, Mechanic redesign01.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6289570

>>6289569

>> No.6289572
File: 10 KB, 1326x86, sfdsdfsfd.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6289572

>>6289543
why do all these AIs make the pupils so big and the sclera non existent?

>> No.6289575

>>6289572
eyes are windows to the soul anon

>> No.6289576

>>6289569
Next time, just use a photo for reference. There is probably enough Chinese empresses photos in the public domain.

>> No.6289586

>>6289569
Is this recent work? The style difference between this and OP is quite big.

>> No.6289587

>>6289586
it shows that AI is not a tool and will cripple your skills

>> No.6289589

>>6289586
that image is collection of a bunch of random images, probably from 3 years ago or there about. the top pic of this post was completed yesterday. I have different styles i like to draw in

>> No.6289590

If you've been doing it for 20 years why are you asking the opinions of permabegs who don't even draw?
Anyway, take a look at the shape language on the hair. Bust out your golden ratio measure, I'm sure you can make it more appealing.

>> No.6289593

>>6289589
>because i used an ai as a tool to shit out an image for reference. origonal pic is 10% from ai ref 90% me.
>Pic rel) examp of art
>>6289586
i am op

>> No.6289594

>>6289590
because its pokie art - thats why im asking these degens

>> No.6289599
File: 691 KB, 885x584, Illustration2.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6289599

>>6289594
>pokies
you are definitely aus/kiwi
anyway it's too late to start from scratch but the combo of western apparel + hair style and asian features looks very weird, something like pic rel would look more cohesive rather than looking like a hapa queen
altho i have friends who have worked on pokies and i dont think they give too much of a shit for quality

>> No.6289600

>>6289594
It looks gaudy, like an airbrushed face on a van in the 80s. Probably in keeping with pokie art.

>> No.6289607

>>6289569
oi Dazza! you still owe me a cold one mate!

>> No.6289610

OP here, there is no art test bs I was just looking for an excuse to post my AI art and have you turds rate it thanks for validating me lol

>> No.6289612

>>6289391

Very uncanny valley and unappealing. If that's what you're going for, well done. If not, you should scrap it and try again.

>> No.6289614

>>6289610
>I was just pretending to be retarded

>> No.6289617

>>6289612
suck my nuts faggot
>>6289607
i owe you shit cunt
>>6289610
fuck off faggot u aint op

>> No.6289619

>>6289617
You're an aussie... so... translation: I love you bros!

>> No.6289626

Strayan time 4chan truly is the worst

>> No.6290536
File: 905 KB, 640x640, 1663881881440063.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6290536

>>6289537
>This food suck 1/10 -customer
>Can you even cook? cunt XD -cooker

>> No.6290546

Is no one going to bring up that this isn't a symbol but a portrait?

>> No.6290571

>>6290546
in the art test , the character symbol has to mainly be a face with boarder

>> No.6292874
File: 1.32 MB, 1330x1154, 1661305332548.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6292874

Someone posted this on another thread and HEH, that face in the middle is identical to "your" "art", OP.

>> No.6292914
File: 1007 KB, 1024x1024, 1637182297857.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6292914

>>6289391
THIS IS NOW A /g/ BOARD!
THERE ARE CURRENTLY 14 AI THREADS UP ON /ic/!
BUMP! LOOK AT THIS AMAZING AI ART I FOUND!

14!

FOURTEEN!

XIV!

十四!

I HAVE REPORTED ALL OF THEM, YET JANNIES DO NOTHING ABOUT IT!
ONLY WHEN THERE ARE 20+, THEY DELETE ONE OR TWO TO PRETEND THEY'RE WORKING!

>>6292878
>>6292843
>>6292660
>>6291749
>>6291690
>>6291073
>>6290073
>>6289391
>>6289237
>>6289199
>>6289098
>>6286753
>>6278246
>>6273432

>> No.6294075

>>6292874
no, it's not lol are you blind bruh

>> No.6294077

>>6292914
but this isn't AI generated art

>> No.6294078

>>6289558
based karen filtering the AIjeets

>> No.6294130
File: 719 KB, 708x584, 1636767489790.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6294130

>>6294075
>>6294077
Anon, who do we think we're fooling?
Go back to drawing your own stuff, at least it feels like you had a personality before.

>> No.6294369

I can't wait for artfags to instinctively start calling out human art as AI art. this place is gonna be an amazing salt mine.

>> No.6294380

>>6294369
Not gonna happen. Every time it has happened as been by by people pretending to be retarded. I think you'll find artists distancing thier styles away from commonly used ai art styles(like clean, airbrush rendered anime) as they become increasingly kitch due to extreme oversaturation.

>> No.6294386

>>6294380
>I think you'll find artists distancing thier styles away from commonly used ai art styles(like clean, airbrush rendered anime) as they become increasingly kitch due to extreme oversaturation.
sounds like the start of a cat and mouse game since these ML models can always be fine tuned on new styles with little to no effort if you have a few high end GPUs

>> No.6294391

>>6294386
Can you post an example?

>> No.6294393

>>6294386
I expect artists putting "Not for AI training" watermarks on all their public work and paywalling the clean versions. It'll be epic.

>> No.6294397

>>6294386
Styles specifically designed to fool ai might pop up. My work from here on out will be hidden in magic eye art. Good luck getting ai to copy that.

>> No.6294406

>>6294391
textual inversion is the poorfag method and only requires a single 3090 and 5 images
https://towardsdatascience.com/how-to-fine-tune-stable-diffusion-using-textual-inversion-b995d7ecc095
you get better results if you actually fine tune the model, like waifu diffusion
>>6294393
kek, watermarks can be trivially removed by (different) AI models

>> No.6294411

>>6294406
Can you post an example?

>> No.6294414

>>6294411
just scroll down till you see the images it's not hard

>> No.6294415

>>6294414
But I want an example from you anon

>> No.6294416
File: 2 KB, 92x125, 1663579995092359s.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6294416

>>6294406
Trivial, yet the ai failed to remove Getty images from it's dataset.

>> No.6294421

>>6294406
Holy kek. The results are worse than I could have predicted. The most basic panda cartoon turns into complete mush with this. This is your trump card?!?! Hahahaha

>> No.6294425
File: 266 KB, 1300x891, textual-inversion-examples.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6294425

>> No.6294426

>>6294421
AI pajeets are fucking delusional. What were you expecting? AI hasn't replaced anything but pajeets drawing for cheap on fiverr.

>> No.6294434

>>6294425
see >>6294415

>> No.6294476

>>6294421
>>6294426
Here you go faggots >>6294425, and that's mediocre even by SD standards. Remember, these AI models only get better with time. Just a few months ago we were stuck with DALLE-mini which was only good for screwing around

>> No.6294485

>>6294476
Am I supposed to be impressed? lol.
>Just a few months ago we were stuck with DALLE-mini which was only good for screwing around
That was just the result of some pajeet spending some couple hundred thousand dollars for better training. And it already reached diminishing returns. You won't see any improvement in months, or even years if you don't include closed stuff like google's image.

>> No.6294495

>>6294485
ultimately I don't care if you're impressed or not, the only thing that's relevant is that artfags market value will plummet across the board, and it's simply gonna get worse with time as you all get replaced with farms of retards and coomers bruteforcing prompts. the top few percent will survive but it'll be a bloodbath

>> No.6294500

>>6294495
why exactly are you excited for the art world to be flooded with AI trash?

>> No.6294503

>>6294495
Cool delusion, maybe in 40 years. Nothing's happening right now and the copyright issue has yet to be solved so I don't care.

>> No.6294511

>>6294476
Retard, I was using dalle-2 in April, before that various colab gans, all superior to dalle-mini. Not to mention years ago we had thispersondoesnotexist, this waifudoesnotexist and art breeder, stop the bullshit.

>> No.6294515

>>6294495
That's not how art fandom works. AI work gets no love, because it was made with none. It's a novelty for the time being.

>> No.6294519

>>6294511
>proprietary shit
>non-general purpose shit

>> No.6294525

>>6294519
>Shifting goalposts

>> No.6294528

>>6294519
A pajeet training a model for NPC coomers is not technological progress.

>> No.6294912

>>6294130
wow. you are fucking dumb and dense to see an relation to that.

>>
Delete posts
Password [?]Password used for file deletion.
Captcha
Action