2022-05-12: Ghost posting is now globally disabled. 2022: Due to resource constraints, /g/ and /tg/ will no longer be archived or available. Other archivers continue to archive these boards.Become a Patron!
It's not real art, is it?It's just existent art and photos put together.I could do that even without AI, and it would take me just a few minutes.Why are artists losing their minds over that crap? Normies can't take advantage of AI art without artistic theory, they aren't real artists after all.
>>6289237>without artistic theoryThey don't know anatomy, perspective, composition, color theory, value, lighting, etcTheir "art" will always be crap, and limited because of it.
>>6289237>it's not real artKeep coping
>>6289283Did you intend to have her blend into the chair/wall?
>>6289238cope and seethe artgroid
>>6289287You never know what an artists' intentions are
like it or not the genie is already out of the bottle
>>6289237If you’re given a tool to make anything you want and the result is subpar then I have to wonder if that is the extent of one’s imagination.
>>6289301These AI images are far from subpar and will only get better over time Also art is subjective anyway
>>6289237AI's gonna make you obsolete, buddy.
>It's not real art, is it?Anything that has an expressive component to it is art.>It's just existent art and photos put together.No, the generative models don't have any photos stored inside them, they use probabilistic methods to associate keywords with pixels.>Why are artists losing their minds over that crap? Which artists? Most people who don't make kitschy, hackneyed, repetitive images don't really care. Even those whose output is cliched can rely on the human appeal of their output. Most people shitposting on /ic/ either praising AI or freaking out about it are mentally ill and want attention.>Normies can't take advantage of AI art without artistic theory, they aren't real artists after all.Correct, now stop making threads about AI.
>>6289335Finally someone sane
Ai art are like dildos, they're just like a normal penis would feel, but it's not the same.
>>6289337Keep on seething.
>>6289348Those are funny, good job anon.Now do monalisa but she's a pink haired anime cat girl, she's naked, and there's a dick on her mouth, plenty of saliva too. Thanks in advance.
the masala has been cooked sirs
>>6289348>>6289393>monalisa but she's a pink haired anime cat girl, she's naked, and there's a dick on her mouth, plenty of salivaAI art is the future, please put a bushy penis with leaking cum, and huge bazonkas too, also give me a furfag variant, thanks in advance anon.
>>6289393>>6289399I'm waiting for that amazing AI art on my desk by 17:00
AI art is the bestBtw anon, put some animal patterns on her skin in the furfag variant, and make her tail around 1 meter long, and make her balls huge :D
I want her fur species to be neon pink colored, a black panther, and some purple gradient skin fur.Please make her height exactly 155 cm
>>6289283>>6289330>>6289348So it's perfectly fine if we go on /g/ and say the same thing about your programming skills?Noted, in a couple of years when AI coding get's better, we'll make sure to do the same with you guys :). Really looking forward to making my own programs or video games even though I have no idea how to even install Python!
>>6289283it is real art But do not for a second think you are the artist, the machine was the one who sorted through countless images, referenced and mixed them all into a single image. all you did was give orders roll for your gacha art and then take your pick.it is art, but if you call yourself the "artist" then you are a bum, you aren't the one who did the work and tried to express a message you're just the commissioner giving orders.
>>6289417Not a programmer, I'm an artist like you fags. AI is already better at rendering than anyone here and this shit is still in it's infancy. It's only gonna get better at making art. It's striking a nerve with you but that's the truth. You're gonna have to learn to embrace it.
>>6289435realistic face again on an styled piece>the, no trust me it's getting better meme at this point>hhmmmmmmmmmm
yes sirs, the cat is already in the curry sirswe have to push more sirsits infancy stage sirs
>>6289237No. It's not "novel" art either but its not photobashing. Its just hype, the next thing for cryptobros and adjacent parties to latch onto now that they're lost all their money and have to go back to working at McDonald's. Novel art generation will take actual intelligence, not just a souped up pattern matching algorithm, the input has to be understood, interpreted.
>>6289455>cryptobrosThe retard Emad genuinely believes AI art will bring about a new age of NFTs for his crypto cultist followers. Doesn't he realise that infinite supply = zero value? Pajeets never cease to amaze me
>>6289487I don't think Emad cares nor intends to use Stability AI for NFTs. There's far more money to be made with custom AI models and Deep Learning services.Also algorithmic generators (while technically not Neural net AI) were used en mass for NFTs.
>>6289237you can do it once it can do it all day and night and faster the more money you throw at it
>>6289348Now you fuckers have gone too far
It's real art in the hands of a real artist.Just like a pipe.Or a urinal.His points were poignant and hold up today.The Grand Selectors remain, I should know, I'm one of them ;)
>>6289678Yet mass produced AI pictures will never be able to reach the level of a pipe or an urinal. It is less than a fucking urinal kek
>>6289330the most creative use of the AI art is the thumbnail memes, which is something
>>6289426I'd say that its more creative illustration that 'art' really, but desu I don't think the word art even means anything anymore.
>>6289435Ok now draw sonic fanart AI kun :)
>>6289678>Just like a pipe.>Or a urinal.stopped reading therefuck your post-modernism and fuck your ai
>>6289348need moar nao
>>6289670You call that ugly mess a hand?
>>6289283Friendly reminder to artists to always steal AI art and make it your own.
>>6289859Idk man, that image seems to confuse technological advancements with class exploitation
>>6289237It analyzes pieces and generates its own. It’s doesn’t photo bash, keep coping
>>6292514its a glorified photobasher, cope
>>6289237>I could do that even without AI, and it would take me just a few minutes.>few minutesNigger that's hundreds of seconds. In other words hundreds of times longer than AI.
>>6292524Yoooo does that mean we also need to find a way consume a hundred times faster to catch up with the AI? Sick
>>6292529Yes it does and I am more than willing to up my consoomption to match
>>6289237THIS IS NOW A /g/ BOARD!THERE ARE CURRENTLY 14 AI THREADS UP ON /ic/!BUMP! LOOK AT THIS AMAZING AI ART I FOUND!14!FOURTEEN!XIV!十四!I HAVE REPORTED ALL OF THEM, YET JANNIES DO NOTHING ABOUT IT!ONLY WHEN THERE ARE 20+, THEY DELETE ONE OR TWO TO PRETEND THEY'RE WORKING!>>6292878>>6292843>>6292660>>6291749>>6291690>>6291073>>6290073>>6289391>>6289237>>6289199>>6289098>>6286753>>6278246>>6273432
>>6289237It's not real art. There is no soul in it. There is no intelligence. There is no lifetime of practicing how to draw, how to paint. There is no suffering and struggle and self-doubt and all the other infinite complexities that make the artist's work special and unique. All those things which used to make an artist and their art special have been reduced to a dozen or so words in a text box.Techfags have effectively killed one of the most unique, human things in existence. For what? Emma Watson, naked, sexy, 8k, award winning, realistic photography, portrait.
>>6289417average (human programmer) or (average human) programmer?Because the (average human) artist is shit
>>6289295I can track you through the archives>>6289237Yes, it is photobashed
>>6293153>soulSshhh! The techfags hate the S word
>>6293153What I hate most about it all is their presumptuousness. There's a shitload of mouth breathing techfags who say>the smart artists will use it to their advantage! it's a tool! you can just skip the process now! :)when the process is the heart of art making. They act like they've just done the equivalent of replacing our horses with cars, but it's more like giving frozen pizza to a deer hunter with the expectation that he'll put down the gun and go home. Also look at all the assumptions they make about subject matter. For many artists the subject is reached unconsciously while drawing - you can see this quite clearly with Claire Wendling and Moebius. Sitting on your ass and thinking of prompts doesn't involve the imagination in any such way.
>/ic/els still coping that they're going to be irrelevant in a few years
>>6293897if we are irrelevant, why do you still care anon?why do you even come here on this irrelevant board?
>>6293897that wont make you relevant tho.
>>6289237you tell me
>>6289283>>6289426>sirs i promise it real>>6293216
>>6289238Your art will always be crap too if all you know is how to do things "correctly" according to some old academic standards.
>>6293153>There is no suffering and struggle and self-doubt and all the other infinite complexitiesMost art isn't about suffering, struggle and self-doubt though. That's just leftist bullshit romanticism.
>>6294231>Most art isn't about suffering, struggle and self-doubt though. That's just leftist bullshit romanticism.The point wasn't about art literally depicting those things. Those are life experiences which shape the artist as they learn how to draw.
>>6294245Yes I know what you meant. Have you ever studied art history? Most artists weren't some sort of romantic suffering figures but just your basic craftsmen, not so much different from a carpenter for instance. The suffering artist is just a meme from the 19th century.
>>6294251You're getting caught up on the suffering aspect, which isn't necessarily even present. It can be one of many potential elements which are present and define an artist's personal identity, their learning process and their work. There's a reason every artist paints or draws differently.
>>6289441It's called art nouveau, faggot.
>>6294332Most I know prob calls that style CGI in animation and you be surprised how many people have picked up on when its used
>>6294332that or mo-cap if y'all ni/g/s even remember ImageMovers always doing semi realistic stuff
>>6289237Why don't real artists use AI as a tool? >>6293153>B-but I'm a nice guy
Reminder that this is what AI shills think is the future.
>>6293153Artists are now like LotR's elves in third age. Our time is at an end. Only unfortunately, we don't have a Valinor to sail to.