Comic made with AI (Midjourney)

[Anonymous No.6275606]

https://twitter.com/UrsulaV/status/1568685612168892423/photo/1

[Anonymous No.6275613]

>>6275606
>it took me a couple months
It took him a couple months to generate that forgettable thing even with the help of AI... GPT can do a better story

[Anonymous No.6275614]

This is the extent of your imagination? This is what you wanted to usher forth from the deepest crevices of your subconscious thoughts? You’re given a tool to make any image you want and…that’s it?

[Anonymous No.6275618]

>>6275606
there's been so many of these and they all look the same

[Anonymous No.6275626]

>>6275618
They haven't fed the AI enough comics for it to learn how to make anything else. I'm waiting with baited breath for they let it absorb everything on the internet, thus unintentionally making it only capable of producing Sonic and Undertale porn. No matter what prompt you give, you will get Sonic porn every time.

[Anonymous No.6275630]

>>6275626
>making it only capable of producing Sonic and Undertale porn
Well that'd take out half the artists' jobs out there.

[Anonymous No.6275641]

im going to cry

[Anonymous No.6275643]

>>6275606
This feels like a comic you would find on the floor in a obscure 1$ walking sim game on steam made by a single developer.

[Anonymous No.6275646]

>>6275606
All style no substance, as usual.

[Anonymous No.6275655]

AI will never produce this.

[Anonymous No.6275656]

[Anonymous No.6275664]

>>6275630
You greatly underestimate how much porn Sonic fans consume. They’ll need both humans and A.I. to produce it constantly just to make through lunch.

[Anonymous No.6275665]

>>6275655
>>6275656
Promt?

[Anonymous No.6275668]

>>6275606
Yeah its pretty dull

[Anonymous No.6275679]

>>6275606
Why do these all have the same weird theme/story? Also I keep noticing people saying about the great leap in recent months. That's bullshit Discodiffusion on google colab was able to produce good coherent stuff. Did a few panels with it. It's just you couldn't be a complete brainlet to operate it.

[Anonymous No.6275700]

>>6275655
>>6275656
Even from a purely technical point of view, clean lineart like this is impossible for an AI to reproduce.

[Anonymous No.6275710]

>>6275606

yikes

[Anonymous No.6275718]

Oh no no

[Anonymous No.6275722]

The images were heavily retouched and worked on.
https://twitter.com/UrsulaV/status/1568685991145213953

[Anonymous No.6275735]

>>6275606
>taking two months to create a bland comic that any average comic/manga artist could've written and drawn in 2-3 weeks or less
As usual, AIfags are counterproductive retards with no imagination.

[Anonymous No.6275739]

>>6275679
The people making them are consoomers who couldn't put effort to get any original ideas before AI. Everyone has a big microphone now, but they only use it to say worthless shit. I personally am looking forward to all the immoral uses that come from AI, it's where it's utility will shine

[Anonymous No.6275760]

>>6275735
So far we've seen idiot twitter NFT grifters uploading raw, unedited outputs, and braindead failed writers without an ounce of taste or creativity trying to make graphic novels or whatever with AI.

Kek it really is not looking good for AI bros. "AI will unleash human creativity!!!" and it ends up in a deluge of retarded shit. Where is the groundbreaking AI art made by super epic hyper creative people who just can't draw? It's all NFT grifters who suck each others cocks.

[Anonymous No.6275783]

>>6275760
I've been thinking, /ic/ should make its own publishing circle to step above these absolute bottom of the barrel uninspired people that are now given free alleyway to publish visual imagery on the internet. People will refer to groups and big names to curate their content instead of individuals in the future.

[Anonymous No.6276243]

>>6275783
The issue is the public has a negative image of 4chan, plus a publishing circle would need be managed.

[Anonymous No.6276281]

>>6276243
>Katawa shoujo

[Anonymous No.6276299]

>>6276243
As stupid as it seems, the Call of the Crocodile fiction author got rich and famous to the point that Goodreads freely advertises him just because he had his book related to 4chan by buying an ad here once. I guess polemics sell

[Anonymous No.6276310]

>>6275618
They all look like shit because they're made by writer who think the AI enables them to make comics without an artist.
The meta for making GOOD comics will probably involve AI in some capacity, yeah, but you'll still need an art guy. As well as a real writer.

[Anonymous No.6276333]

>>6275606
>midjourney
A better workflow already exists.

[Anonymous No.6276337]

>>6276333
yooooo that is fucking cool

[Anonymous No.6276422]

>>6276333
Software?

[Anonymous No.6276447]

>>6275606
did the Ai write it? thats the most retarded opening line ever and i think a 5 year old could do better.

[Anonymous No.6276483]

>>6276447
People who use AI are not creative or skilled? Say it ain't so!

[Anonymous No.6276493]

>>6275606
kek, looks like those porn games that run porn screenshots through photoshop’s painting filter

[Anonymous No.6276770]

>>6275606
sage ai spam
hide ai spam
report ai spam

[Anonymous No.6277058]

>>6275606
It looks bad. I wouldn't buy this comic even if I had no idea an AI was involved. I am annoyed by people who parade these AIs around like this is the death of artistry when these AIs at best are just remix mashers. I have seen these programs make good art, but all it is a feat of software engineering, not an artistic endeavor.

[Anonymous No.6277265]

>>6275783
someone will just publish racist shit and then no one will want to touch it

[Anonymous No.6277269]

>>6276333
either fake gay and aids or whatever literally what did you do

[Anonymous No.6277270]

I swear where could he possibly be

[Anonymous No.6277271]

>>6277269
>reeeee

[Anonymous No.6277278]

>>6275606
>https://twitter.com/UrsulaV/status/1568685612168892423/photo/1

blech i glazed over ... everything?

seriously its like... clickbait fucked a angsty teen

ughhhh its literally missing all human touch, i couldn't paint a better picture of what's wrong with zoomology and NFTers

this encapsulates everything wrong with this generation...

[Anonymous No.6277282]

>>6277270
>why isn't a low priority board with >100 active users not getting constantly swept
This board clearly doesn't have a dedicated jannie

[Anonymous No.6277339]

>>6275626
it's already scraped billions of images including comics and manga that are illegally uploaded, it won't get better, the "rapid progress" you're seeing is the devs intentionally hamstringing it for hype generation and cpm marketing to pump their commercially unviable nutech shitcoin

[Anonymous No.6277358]

>>6277339
Keep coping
SD was trained on pics with NSFW score smaller than 0.5 and aesthetic score bigger than 0.5, excluding nearly all comics pages and anime pics

[Anonymous No.6277567]

>>6275722
Yet it still looks like utter shit

[Anonymous No.6277577]

>>6277282
No it does. Anons get bans for Ted posting in AI threads long before those threads get deleted. I wouldn’t be surprised if the /ic/ janny is another /g/ tranny.

[Anonymous No.6277583]

>>6277567
this is why I'm saying it's worthless even as a tool

[Anonymous No.6277660]

>>6275739
This, the flood of photo-realistic cheese pizza is going to be insane.

[Anonymous No.6277666]

>>6277358
We speak english here Pajeet

[Anonymous No.6277712]

>>6275665
Nice try

[Anonymous No.6277731]

>>6275606
>the collapse

[Anonymous No.6277736]

Ai fags bury me everyday thinking I'm Jesus or what? How can you fear a men with a pen so much?

[Anonymous No.6277766]

Why are all comics made with Ai post apocalyptic?

[Anonymous No.6277773]

>>6277736
cringlelord lmao

[Anonymous No.6277777]

>>6277766
It's a freudian slip

[Anonymous No.6277791]

/ic/ is where gpt-3 discusses midjourney and stable diffusion

[Anonymous No.6277794]

>>6277777
good numbers for a good post

[Anonymous No.6277826]

>>6277731
it's not a coincidence that these people have a post apocalyptic fetish and romanticize the destruction of humanity so much

[Anonymous No.6277830]

>>6275606
>ai generated shit
Has no value. I won't read a single line of it.

[Anonymous No.6277833]

>>6275606
The writing is very self indulgent. Couldnt read past 2 pages so i just started looking at the panels.
Theyre purdy enough, but theyre basically all establishing shots and photos.
Still, this is one hell of a tool, going to use it for my stuff.

[Anonymous No.6277836]

>>6277833
very organic post pajeet

[Anonymous No.6277842]

>barely started feeling the form
>some fa/g/: HEY GUYS I INVENTED AI FOR ART
>mfw

[Anonymous No.6277884]

the real black pill is that your high effort not only that it won't even be really appreciated, but this has been the case for a long, long time. normgroids look at random mushes of nonsensical colors and think "wow, that's fucking gorgeous, amazing, this is so impressive". but this has always been the case. all that detail you cared about was mostly for yourself and other artists who view art very critically, an extreme minority of people. it is lost on everyone else. i even have the perfect example of this with music
>https://old.reddit.com/r/Eldenring/comments/v3huj4/say_what_you_will_the_godskin_apostles_theme_with/
here you have redditors and other fantards of Elden Ring getting tricked by someone shoving fake lore relevant lyrics into a song with sampled sounds and eating it up instantly, because no one bothers to analyze what they hear at the most minuscule, base level. only a handful of people realize the bullshit, everyone else is impressed by the cool "latin".

[Anonymous No.6277902]

>>6277842
Same here, but there isn't the road to back now, only draw and improve.

[Anonymous No.6277925]

>>6277884
your ire is better aimed at those who seek to commodify the lowest common denominator for quick bugman ingestion, to cement this degenrate zeitgeist where being a manipulative psychopath makes you an influential and successful member of society that is not only capable, but actively encouraged to shape society in their image
michelangelo would literally behead you if you told him that he should be concerned about the shit eating, cow fucking peasantry being unimpressed with his work
“The greater danger for most of us lies not in setting our aim too high and falling short; but in setting our aim too low, and achieving our mark.”
AI didn't invent it, it's been happening for 200 years, it's happening all around you at all times, and all forms of culture, civics, academia, science and politics are being undermined and subverted by collectivist consumer worship
the person that writes "AI is a mortal threat to me, the artist" is the same person that writes "how do i get more twitter followers so that i can become famous, make money and achieve the career of artist" because they are the same person, and i would slit each and every one of their throats myself, even if it took me the rest of my life
don't worry though, entertainment media really is the least of our concerns

[Anonymous No.6277969]

>>6277925
Chad.

[Anonymous No.6278003]

>>6277666
Says ESL who can't even read English lol

[Anonymous No.6278004]

>>6277925
too long didn't read

[Anonymous No.6278066]

>>6277925
12yo shouldn't have access too the internet.

[Anonymous No.6278958]

The AI knows of the coming collapse. I think these ai generators have some kind of sentience.

[Anonymous No.6279692]

>>6275606
Did he credit the artists he stole from? He should have....

[Anonymous No.6282264]

>>6275655
do you not remember a few years ago when AI couldn't even make the simplest image? Even text (which is much easier) was pathetic.

[Anonymous No.6282266]

>>6282264
Do you remember 50 years ago when they made rockets that could send men to the moon?

[Anonymous No.6282275]

>>6282264
Years ago it was the same ugly shit we're seeing now. 7-8 years ago were were getting shit like this where, just like now, it would look OK as a thumbnail at a quick glance but looking at it for more than 2 seconds shows how fucked up and weird it is.
You AI shills are such bad liars to think nobody remembers things or can't look things up.

[Anonymous No.6282279]

>>6282264
The individual lines in professional, clean lineart can describe outline, cross-contour, boundaries between light and dark, or between hues of colours, surface texture, material, repetitive patterns, shading, gesture and motion, or any combination of them. On top of that, the lines have to be arranged in a way that looks clean, and aesthetically pleasing.
The AI will never learn to reproduce it, because it looks for visual patterns and there is no none in the lineart that it can recognize. To the AI it will always look like a bunch of lines, sometimes vaguely in the shape of objects, sometimes seemingly random, some areas more dense with lines, some sparse. A human looking at the lineart can see the intention very clearly, a machine cannot.

[Anonymous No.6282313]

>>6275679
>Why do these all have the same weird theme/story?
They can't really draw people so the story has to take place in an empty post-apocalyptic setting.

[Anonymous No.6282567]

>>6282279
Maybe render in grayscale then run something like this:
http://www.flamingpear.com/india-ink.html
But to get results even close to an actual comic page it would take years and years in the future and it would still look phony and artificial.

[Anonymous No.6282636]

>>6282279
>A human looking at the lineart can see the intention very clearly, a machine cannot.
The humans training it can.

[Anonymous No.6282649]

>>6282275
this isn't the correct argument
AI can and will be able to do those things, but the only way for it to do so is by sorting billions of illegally obtained images that already exist, infringing the property rights of tens of millions of people, similar to how people laughed at the karens on facebook posting about how mark zuckerberg and bill gates are turning your face into their property, shortly before face creation AI hit the scene, similar to how we all type captchas and click on images of bicycles and street signs "for our own security," which have taught AI how to read and have taught self-driving cars how to drive; this AI can already read and speak, what you're seeing is extra code being put on top of it to prevent it from saying that vaccines cause heart attacks
big tech has turned us all into slaves, but it only takes a handful of orbital missiles and an EMP to make it all go away forever in the blink of an eye
not to mention that once you have an AI that can deterministically create any image, creating an AI that can deterministically delete every one of those images like an ad blocker is far easier to make, because this is not AI, it is procedurally generated through a rigid, deterministic algorithm, and true randomization does not exist
this is absolutely an era of great danger for humanity, but for the art industry this is a nothingburger: there is already not going to be an art industry where we're headed and as i've said before, the communist left will completely drop troons and niggers and the environment for this, i naively said it would begin next year but it's already happening now

[Anonymous No.6282663]

>>6282264
in the end it doesn't matter for me, even ignoring the fact that AI will always look soulless. I couldn't stomach having no art progress, no looking back at my achievements. i couldn't stomach having collective progress with literally everyone else, and me "being" good means dependency on software updates, and database enlargement with stolen work. there would be no "me" in there, no individuality, no self improvement. I'd rather not do it at all. even using it on my own work would be hollow

[Anonymous No.6282684]

>>6277925
Based. Schizos and autists will save the world.

[Anonymous No.6282843]

>>6282649
I love you and think you’re really smart

[Anonymous No.6283883]

>>6282649
>>6277925
Fuck off ESL

[Anonymous No.6283901]

>>6277358
so you're saying that once the devs allow the tidal wave of low quality coom art to influence the ai algorithm, that's what will bring in the fabled golden age of ai that's always just two weeks around the corner?

[Anonymous No.6284113]

>>6283901
AI art is already higher quality than 99.9% of /ic/

[Anonymous No.6286637]

>>6276333
whoooaaaaaaa, it's the photoshop autofill tool, this was amazing in 2008!

[Anonymous No.6286648]

>>6284113


>>6275606

yikes

[Anonymous No.6286695]

>>6275739
What kind of immoral uses?

[Anonymous No.6286706]

>>6283883
Good post ser

[Anonymous No.6287186]

>>6275679
Because it's made by uncreative bugmen incel neets from /g/

[Anonymous No.6287286]

>>6286695
Instantaneous Emma Watson nude pics are just a microscopic sample of what's to follow, past week a video AI transformed african little mermaid into white on motion and caused all sort of outcry from media outlets. Imagine if you merge these two concepts into an AI-assisted camera/glasses

[Anonymous No.6287292]

>mogs your tranime and capeshit

[Anonymous No.6287308]

>>6284113
Merc WIP is unironically better than AI. Street shitters and late NFT adopters can fuck off now, no one's buying your narrative. The only good thing to come from AI so far is Dalle Warwick memes.

[Anonymous No.6287326]

>>6275606
>tacky backgrounds with shit composition
>inconsistent art style
>human characters are reduced to flat black silhouettes

You realize in order for AI to be a threat it needs to be able to not only do human work *competently* but also BETTER. Forget the "in 5 years" projections, I feel like I'll be waiting longer. Just like how there's no self-driving cars, still no kiosks fully replacing retail work, still no journeys to Mars, all this future hype shit is blabbered out by I HECKIN LOVE SCIENCE dorks. Not educated nerds, retards who didn't finish school but think because they have a hand computer they're the forerunners of future society.

[Anonymous No.6287343]

>>6287326
In september 30 "Tesla AI day" Elon Musk will finally reveal his catgirl AI robot the world, whether it fails or succeeds will be decisive insight of this technology potential for the current decade

[Anonymous No.6287362]

>>6287343
Oh the guy who promised self-driving cars and Mars voyages? The things that were supposed to happen 5 years ago?

[Anonymous No.6287463]

>>6287292
I fucking hate white people

[Anonymous No.6287474]

>>6287326
i used to be excited for humanity expanding to the stars, but in the last 8 years or so, I've grown to want it remain stuck on this shithole as the sun swallows it whole, partly because of these dystopia loving bugmen. and it makes me happy to know that humanity will never leave this planet

[Anonymous No.6287477]

>>6287292
I love that every single panel in this "comic" is either an empty landscape or a front facing portrait shot.
And I guess the only way to get vaguely consistent characters is to literally just put in the name of a celebrity, huh?

[Anonymous No.6287500]

I tried to ignore it at first with these AI comics, but man these are some ugly text and speech bubbles. Not terrible but it distracts me sometimes

[Anonymous No.6287677]

>>6287500
AI artists need an AI that generates fitting text bubbles to truly democratize comics

[Anonymous No.6287757]

>>6275700
“Pencil sketch of a Squirrel reading a book”:

[Anonymous No.6287848]

Ai will never be good at writing stories or comics. At best they'll just be good at producing soulless images. AI is useless and will not exist in the future.

Where was AI a couple of years ago? Producing images from a library.

Where is AI now? Producing images from a library slightly better. pathetic. AI idiots cope harder.

[Anonymous No.6287856]

>>6287757
It's not a terrible picture, but, there's no lineart there.

[Anonymous No.6287884]

>>6287856
The genie is out of the bottle and its not going back in.

[Anonymous No.6288209]

>>6287884
fa/g/gots try using any other metaphor other than "genie is out the bottle" or "pandora's box is open" challenge (IMPOSSIBLE)

[Anonymous No.6288397]

holy shit we're safe

I still expect the whole webtoon industry to use AI generated backgrounds because the workload there is fucking insane

[Anonymous No.6288409]

>>6277339
How do you like this AI generation?

[Anonymous No.6288413]

>>6288409
not ai, but ok

[Anonymous No.6288432]

>>6288409
What's impressive about it?

[Anonymous No.6288436]

>>6288432
No idea, looks like the usual incoherent garbage to me.

[Anonymous No.6288440]

>>6288436
If I were you I'd make the images even smaller I can still see the artifacts.

[Anonymous No.6288444]

>>6288440
They're not mine.

[Anonymous No.6288450]

>>6288413
It's AI. Might be the waifudiffusion model? female anime faces haven't been a challenge for over a year. When did thiswaifudoesntexist come out?

[Anonymous No.6288455]

>>6287477
Better than Greg Land lmao

[Anonymous No.6288456]

>>6288450
It's NovelAI shilling on his twitter.
>>6288450
>thiswaifudoesntexist
2019
But we had publicly avaiable anime face generation since 2016

[Anonymous No.6288472]

>>6288456
This one is from shilling on /aids/ instead of twitter.

[Anonymous No.6288487]

>>6288472
Will he ever realase or will he keep posting "examples" twitter?

[Anonymous No.6288496]

>>6288472
what do they even do in that general?

[Anonymous No.6288502]

>>6288496
It's originally about using AI to generate adventures and stories, but mostly it's text porn.

[Anonymous No.6288506]

>>6288496
A cycle of:
>hype up new AI software/creator
>get let down
>shitpost
>>6288502
And this sprinkled in

[Anonymous No.6288511]

>>6288472
How the fuck is this so much better than SD?
This is mind-blowing.

[Anonymous No.6288513]

>>6288506
>>6288502
do they read one another's stories? or is it like RP or something? weird

[Anonymous No.6288517]

>>6288513
It's kind of like RPing with the machine. Some people post their stories, but nobody reads those. Sharing is mostly limited to prompts, which are a setup for a story you can then put in the AI and steer to go where you like by adding and changing text.

[Anonymous No.6288521]

>>6288511
Considering most of his images have perfectly intact watermarks he's probably doing a lot of post processing to get better results.

[Anonymous No.6288537]

>>6275614
To be fair, we are at the very beginnings ng of a several decade odyssey of people using these tools. Be patient

[Anonymous No.6288690]

Someone in another thread pointed out that the people who are most impressed by the AI might have aphantasia. I think that’s probably right.
They think that if they say the words “big tiddy waifu with purple hair” and the AI does indeed draw that, then the AI has drawn “what they imagined”. The idea that someone could be after a very particular image that they have in mind, let alone an image that is difficult or impossible to put into words, is beyond them.

[Anonymous No.6288695]

>>6275606
>Comic made with AI

It looks like shit, and I could do something better just putting a filter over a photo on those shitty websites with photo editors.

[Anonymous No.6288700]

>>6288695

Here's a pro tip for the AI art fags on this board:

>You don't need AI to draw garbage for you

>Just learn Photoshop, and some Photobashing

>It'll look a lot better, and it's free, no need for subs.

[Anonymous No.6288705]

>>6288690
That argument has a certain appeal, but I don't think that's all there is to it. People commission artwork from artists and probably also have a decent idea of what they want. Maybe they'll ask for revisions. With image generations, you can try to find an image that is somewhat close, then keep the seed fixed and try to get it closer to your idea. It's not fully luck based.

[Anonymous No.6288718]

>>6288705
>With image generations, you can try to find an image that is somewhat close

AI art is straight up retarded, picrel is one of the funniest things that someone did with this crap.

>AI please draw animu waifu named Subaru

>AI draw a car

[Anonymous No.6288748]

>>6288690
They're verbal thinkers.
Their idea of what an artist is seems to be something like a writer or a film director who just comes up with big ideas and either let the theatre of mind or a studio full of other people handle the details.
I don't deny those are also worthy forms of art. But these people don't seem to really understand what the traditional arts of draftmanship and painting and sculpting are about. They don't have respect for the detail-obsessed process that these arts require.

[Anonymous No.6288758]

>>6288700
Stable diffusion is also free and has no subscriptions.
Photoshop, on the other hand...

[Anonymous No.6288760]

>>6288690
>Someone in another thread pointed out that the people who are most impressed by the AI might have aphantasia. I think that’s probably right.
no anon, they're fucking retards. they don't sit to ponder about things, they think that "imagining things" refers simply to random ideas. they probably never even tried to have mental images

[Anonymous No.6288763]

>>6288748
It's a good possibility.

If they have trouble with the visual processing part of their brains, they will never think like an artist to begin with.

Niggas have slow brain GPUs.

[Anonymous No.6288764]

I'm starting to appreaciate AI threads, they pretty much took all the shitposting outside of discussion threads.
This board feels pretty nice to use lately, you can post your stuff in a thread and laugh at AI retards in their containment shitposting thread.

[Anonymous No.6288765]

>>6287757
>retard doesn't even know what lineart means
pajeet, learn to draw. it would make you at least somewhat human

[Anonymous No.6288771]

the curry has been cooked sirs
no art buzzword pls sirs
me not understand

[Anonymous No.6288865]

>>6288758
>Photoshop, on the other hand

Anon, I...

[Anonymous No.6288936]

>>6276333
This is illegal. Make your own work first than autofill in the rest faggot.

[Anonymous No.6288953]

>>6282649
Just say AI bad already you fucking pollack. I don't give a shit about conspiracies, humanity was doomed from inception there's no point acting like you're above it.

[Anonymous No.6288987]

Just imagine every book, every painting, every drawing, every game, and every creative job, is done by AI, if I knew a book was made by an AI, I would not read it. What a depressing world we live in.

[Anonymous No.6289005]

It's over.

[Anonymous No.6289024]

>>6289005
I see that ignorance of how copyright works abounds. Neat.

Ban AI threads.

[Anonymous No.6289074]

>>6289024
I'm pretty sure that the Copyright Office understands it better than you.

[Anonymous No.6289086]

>>6289074
I'm pretty sure you have no clue what I was even alluding to, so just stop digging yourself in.

[Anonymous No.6289087]

>>6289074
The copyright office can assign a number to anything at all, that doesn't make you immune from lawsuits later on once someone finds you plagiarized their work, it just means there are no current claims against it.

[Anonymous No.6289114]

>retarded ic niggers think they can fight Microsoft (government) through government means
hahahahah

[Anonymous No.6289309]

>>6289005
this particular case doesn’t solve the issue of whether AI art can be copyrighted, since it’s a comic book where a human wrote the text. Anthologies which include cc0 or non copyrightable images can also file for copyright even if the images themselves aren’t. So we still don’t know if the art itself is property of the author or if any rando can take their AI images and put it on a t shirt on redbubble.