[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/ic/ - Artwork/Critique


View post   

File: 54 KB, 639x480, images (51).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6271203 No.6271203 [Reply] [Original]

Can we have a conservative art inspo thread?

>> No.6271206
File: 448 KB, 989x1280, 3902A880-7EE2-46DD-A29A-F3DF8F6FC2CA.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6271206

>>6271203
Sure I’ll start

>> No.6271211

>>6271203
conserve what? Profits for multinational corporations who push racist propaganda like the coca cola ad you posted? Or do you mean conserve tax payer money for invading sovereign nations who oppose the global banking cartel? Or conserve the “right” to consume poisonous goyslop?

>> No.6271214

>>6271211
well OP your thread is over next time don't word in a way that sends trannies into a frothing rage, enjoy your single picture of a man's ass

>> No.6271216

>>6271203
Isn't all art pre 1900's conservative?

>> No.6271221
File: 140 KB, 900x670, A2B558F4-8D37-47DF-9669-973C178DAA0F.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6271221

>>6271216
No, actually. I see why you might think that, but Toulouse Lautrec didn’t spring forth from nowhere, he was cut from a cloth of artists that dates back to Raphael.

>> No.6271226
File: 86 KB, 570x741, 5a563e4b00773ed26ab11c00c5f40c86abd34e757bdfeac06d6429a05757aee8.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6271226

>>6271203
all i have is this

>> No.6271227

>>6271211
Conserve traditional values like freedom strength, discipline, etc

>> No.6271228

>>6271227
What does the post above yours have to do with freedom strength and discipline?

>> No.6271231
File: 110 KB, 600x634, 143e01bdd40376c27157e357da4f6fb0fc3291c451b574298d7a50319d91edd5.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6271231

>> No.6271233
File: 25 KB, 334x351, 1661805534791273.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6271233

can you stop posting this thread every few weeks?

>> No.6271234

>>6271233
Why

>> No.6271235

>>6271226
so cute I'm in love

>> No.6271236
File: 424 KB, 2000x1458, C90E122D-9661-49A5-8A73-AD51CDA1AED6.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6271236

>>6271231
Always with the same faux-Norman Rockwell 50s magazine illustration style. Is that all you people mean by “conservative”? Why would anyone take this poorly drawn paint by numbers garbage over Degas’ ballerinas?

>> No.6271243
File: 47 KB, 658x466, images (54).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6271243

>> No.6271244

>>6271236
so funny that you two fags are gonna have this pretend fight about shit no one cares about just so you can waste more time posting on 4chan instead of drawing

>> No.6271253
File: 210 KB, 1068x1200, Christmas Gift.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6271253

>>6271203
How exactly do you define "Conservative art" OP? Modern Conservative values in art? Or conservative in painting style? Or do you just mean old ass paintings?

>>6271236
I don't care much for the other painting, but your painting is at least equally shit. What is that troglodyte in the centre of the room?
Try acting smug and cultured somewhere else.

>> No.6271259

>>6271253
>liking good art is smug and cultured
>hehe the girl has unappealing face I win
>if I made this I’d make all the girls naked hehe
Autistic

>> No.6271260

>>6271259
>Insults one person's tastes
>Cries when his tastes get insulted
Cry more faggot.

>> No.6271268
File: 59 KB, 463x577, E0DC139B-EA47-4141-8E14-48FBDF0E2A23.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6271268

>>6271260
“Degas is a bad painter” isn’t quite the based take you think it is anon.

>> No.6271271
File: 217 KB, 1100x1200, B44FEC5A-8D19-4F65-9798-10BFF8194DD4.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6271271

Eugene Boudin is peak conservative art

>> No.6271272
File: 43 KB, 548x400, EEBC9658-2D83-46A2-BDC5-B4D7D1228406.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6271272

>>6271271
As was Camille Corot

>> No.6271273

>>6271268
>“Degas is a bad painter” isn’t quite the based take
Based take? I said I didn't like a painting? I don't give two shits if it's "based". Could you be more fragile?

>> No.6271275
File: 437 KB, 1280x1043, ACE54DCC-AF3F-4AD9-A65F-E69AD49175D8.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6271275

>>6271273
Stfu nobody cares fag

Millet was good too

>> No.6271276
File: 241 KB, 1200x789, F5627D05-16CC-47E8-A624-509DAF4DA5FD.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6271276

>>6271275
Van Gogh was quite conservative ironically

>> No.6271278
File: 282 KB, 1200x1758, 31730B74-FFB3-4AB2-8502-D23E0C2022EC.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6271278

>>6271276
Arguably the greatest piece of conservative art

>> No.6271279

>>6271275
>NOOOO STOP REPLYING TO ME WHEN I ADDRESS YOU
Jesus Christ you're a bitch.

>> No.6271280

>>6271227
ah yes, the freedom to dress in the same 5 societally-approved outfits, the freedom to have the exact same lawn and house as everyone on your street, the freedom to conform to the same family unit as everyone else at threat of death, etc etc
the strength to boldly go where literally everyone else has gone. the strength to protest and flood the record company phone lines because elvis gyrated his hips on that goddamned television. the strength to grow up and become whatever is the least offensive to your masters.
the discipline to obey every order you're given. the discipline to never deviate, to always consume the same trite as all the other good little patriots. the discipline to stop thinking and just do as you're told.
god I fucking love conservative values

>> No.6271306
File: 384 KB, 2522x1838, Herbert Paus' date night.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6271306

>>6271203

>> No.6271310
File: 99 KB, 903x550, Just Me n the Boys Hangin.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6271310

>>6271227
Freedom to take a bath with your strong and disciplined friends? Conservatism is more open minded than I thought.

>> No.6271315

>>6271310
Oh my shoulder!

>> No.6271361

>>6271203
>conservative art
>loli midriff

>> No.6271373

>>6271280
You're a degenerate. Keep coping AIDS ridden tranny

>> No.6271377

>>6271211
Conservative as in based right wing art. Traditional family values

>> No.6271379

>>6271211
I feel sad that you've never had a normal family with a mom dad and siblings having fun grilling like a traditional family

>> No.6271381

>>6271280
Freedom as in small government you retard. Actually read about conservatism

>> No.6271382

>>6271361
Get your eyes checked, that's part of her dress... Would you call that a belt?
Anyway, I'm sure you'll appreciate this piece anon : >>6271226

>> No.6271385

>>6271236
Yes Norman Rockwell is what people mean by conservative art. Good ol positive slice of Americana. The baby boomer era. When the economy was good for the last time ever

>> No.6271387
File: 224 KB, 1800x1020, 43C5B830-CC19-4837-B02E-314B8E746995.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6271387

>>6271382
you better check yours, retard

>> No.6271398

>>6271387
The top's shape is perfectly combined with the "belt/midriff" so to me it still looks like a belt, BUT the bigger image does show shadow of overlap from the bottom dress... I guess I'll take the L on this one? I mean I still think it's a belt, but it's debatable enough where I can see where you're coming from now.

>> No.6271405

>>6271398
she literally has the side planes of the rectus painted, are you genuinely blind?

>> No.6271410

>>6271203
there is no conservative art. The conservative art you get so nostalgic by are Commissioned paintings by White supremacists or Commercial art from 1950s aka sellout art for white people

>> No.6271412

>>6271405
No, I see it, but it just looks like a shadow of the fabric to me. I already said I'd take this L anon, why are you still arguing about it? Do you want to change my personal opinion too?

>> No.6271415

>>6271410
Christ, it's like with every word written here you become more and more of a faggot. Keep your dumb shit takes on twitter with the rest of your like minded mob.

>> No.6271416
File: 645 KB, 543x800, 541B377F-B27A-4B59-8F84-51BCD6A7F7C8.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6271416

>>6271412
you are a dumb fucking faggot and going “hurr it’s a belt and it’s debatable but I guess I’ll magnanimously concede because durr” doesn’t cut it after going full fucking retard

>> No.6271423

>>6271203
You know a happy family isn't as conservative a concept as you think it is.
Also what a stupid fucking thread considering it will just get dumb replies from red-in-the-face angry retards like >>6271310 or >>6271206
An otherwise good idea for a thread killed by the need to be edgy. You could've just requested 50s art or vintage art

>> No.6271427

>>6271203
We have this stealt pol thread every month and every month /pol/fags get outed as tourist and nodraws who think that serveral hundred year old European and early 20century american ads some how represented modern conservatism.
>>6271423
These thread is for midwits to yell about politics while never producing a single shred of original art work. You should make a vintage art thread on your own.

>> No.6271432

>>6271416
>Still trying to change my mind
Maybe I am retarded, but you're clearly autistic to get so bent out of shape over someone not seeing something exactly as you see it. I've conceded that the belt could totally be midriff.
>doesn’t cut it after going full fucking retard
And what the fuck would cut it moron? I conceded. I took the L. You won. The fuck more do you want you fuck wit?

And since it'll get your dick hard, yes I see both of those as midriffs.

>> No.6271445

>>6271432
not him but it does make my dick pretty hard yea

>> No.6271447

>>6271423
>dumb replies from red-in-the-face angry retards like >>6271310
I mean, I was just having fun with that, and it seemed like it fit well in the thread since it's literally a piece of art full of strong handsome men painted in a classic detailed way - it's just kinda gay.

as for >>6271206 , it could be conservative art, depending on how OP defines it... which he doesn't really. It's just like >>6271253 asked :
>How exactly do you define "Conservative art" OP? Modern Conservative values in art? Or conservative in painting style? Or do you just mean old ass paintings?

>You could've just requested 50s art or vintage art
And don't both images fall into that category?

>> No.6271448

>>6271432
Those midriffs definitely get my dick hard

>> No.6271451

>>6271445
Then that's the perfect ending to the discussion. Thanks Anon.

>> No.6271460

>>6271451
discuss deez nuts

>> No.6271462

>>6271451
No problem
>>6271460
You're not me.

>> No.6271681

>>6271203
Why does conservative art get people so mad

>> No.6271694

>>6271681
Because Americans can't shut up about their political beliefs - and have now conflated a differing political view from their own, no matter how mild it is, as being morally wrong and evil.

>> No.6271807

>>6271681
Half the shit posted ITT isnt even conservative its just happy families vintage ads and painting made in another lifetime. Also noone ever posts work nor do you see anyone on ic drawing like this so what's the point.

>> No.6271819

>>6271807
What a retarded argument. So we shouldn't even talk about stuff that isn't regularly posted here (trannime, pedophile shit and furry)?

>> No.6271867

>>6271819
These threads only ever amount to people pointing and laughing poltards for their victim complex, extreme ignorance about history in general, and their consistent inability to ever post work.

>> No.6271874

>>6271867
No, not really

>> No.6271878

>>6271807
What do you mean by "conservative" exactly?

>> No.6271881

>>6271878
Art that displays conservative, traditional values like strength, health, discipline, family unity, respect to our heritage, etc. You know typical conservative stuff

>> No.6271883

>>6271211
Family, history, patriotism, religion, and respect for the community. I believe all the corporate interests (which is as much a leftist thing btw) are a psyop by the Right against the Right. It’s hard being a Right winger trying to convince my fellow chuds that opposing corporatism isn’t an attack on capitalism. Leftism is just a cult of cummies and violence apologists tho.

>> No.6271896

>>6271211
>Profits for multinational corporations who push racist propaganda like the coca cola ad you posted?
Do you prefer fat trans niggers for sponsoring a shitty hyperglycemic soft drink?

You're right.

>> No.6272438

>>6271315
C'mon college boy!

>> No.6272498

>>6271881
>our heritage
White america was Anglo-saxons second attempt at creating a meaningful culture outside of imperialism and serfdom and they managed to do it again, only this time with cheeseburgers and facebook. How many tries do these retards need

>> No.6272507

>>6271203
The coca-cola made me kek. God bless america

>> No.6272530

>>6271203
America in the 50s was literally a utopia

>> No.6272534

>>6272530
Except you know the constant threat of nuclear winter

>> No.6272545

>>6272534
Most people didn't really care

>> No.6272554

>>6272545
My dad is much happier in 2022 than he was in 1950-2010. Boomers lived through a lot of miserable decades. The middle class was a very small number of people in the 50s most people were rich or dirt poor this suburbia image was for very few Americans. It’s fantasy

>> No.6272587

Basically any of the art scenes in most of the watchtowers and books by Jehovah's Witnesses are about the most conservative art you can get. From a JW here.

>> No.6272735

Happy families are against the wishes of the Left. The Right champions the nuclear family. Happy family art, by syllogism, is Right Wing art.

>> No.6272738

>>6272498
Unlike you I’ve never had dysentery

>> No.6272758

>>6272554
this
almost half the country had no indoor plumbing back in the 40s nor stable connection to electricity. my 90 yr old grandpa rambles all the time about how much of a shithole america used to be when he was younger

>> No.6272978

>>6271432
>admitting defeat in the most passive-aggressive way possible

maybe you're French

>> No.6273010

>>6272978

>>6271398
>I guess I'll take the L on this one? I mean I still think it's a belt, but it's debatable enough where I can see where you're coming from now.
Doesn't seem very passive aggressive to me?

>> No.6273035

>>6273010
>I *guess* I'll take the L
>I still think I'm right
>but it is ambiguous enough that you think you're right

you don't notice the pattern of evasion and insincerity? notice the waffling and qualifiers intended to dilute the emotional cost of admitting something detrimental to him.

>> No.6273064

>>6273035
Wow, when you emphasise random words and completely re-write things in that way, it totally does make it seem like you're correct here anon. Here I was thinking that if you read things in a certain way, anything can appear negative to you. What a fool I was!

>> No.6273131

>>6273064
>evasion and insincerity

you can't help it

>> No.6273147

Wow not much conservative art here, but the Coca Cola ads are sorta neat.

>> No.6273174

>>6273131
Alright I'll be more blunt and straight forward; you rewrote the words and emphasised one particular part to make your point. I don't read it like that at all. The fact that you take my reply as "evasion and insincerity" just goes to further demonstrate the point I was making: you are reading negative things into these statements. Sure I was being sarcastic and insincere, but evasive? What did I avoid?

I could take what you've written and assume you're being "evasive and insincere" because I can't really believe you didn't understand the point I was making and just didn't want to address it.

>> No.6273500 [DELETED] 

>>6273147
This is why a vintage would be so much cooler than retards coping over not being about shit by fawning over an America that was inaccessible for the general population because they were fucking poorass dirt farmers, unenployed gutter trash, immagrants, and factory workers living in perpetual serfdom.

>> No.6273503
File: 77 KB, 1200x800, 1200x0.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6273503

>>6273500
This is why a vintage thread would be so much cooler than retards coping over not being about shit by fawning over an America that was inaccessible for the general population because they were fucking poorass dirt farmers, unenployed gutter trash, immagrants, and factory workers living in perpetual serfdom. Again these threads had nothing to do with art.

>> No.6273506

>>6273503
Meant for >>6273147

>> No.6273541
File: 83 KB, 500x708, Laughter.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6273541

>>6273503
>This is why a vintage thread
Or even just a thread on well illustrated or designed ads honestly.

> that was inaccessible for the general population because they were fucking poorass dirt farmers, unenployed gutter trash, immagrants, and factory workers living in perpetual serfdom.
America bashing aside, this was the case for most everyone in most points of history, so getting cross at America for being a better example that was closer to equality is silly. Which part of the world was doing better during these times?

>> No.6273629

>>6273174
In every reply in this thread after it became clear that your position was weak, you tried to have it both ways. "Maybe you're right, but I still think I'm right."

wtf grow up

>> No.6273653

>Maybe you're right, but I still think I'm right."
At no point have I said anything like this - the post we're discussing sure, but us right now?

>>6272978
>>6273010
>>6273035
>>6273064
>>6273131
>>6273629

Anyway, you're retarded anon, life isn't a game with constant winners and losers, and though in this case there is no winner, you're definitely a loser.

respond however you want, I'm done replying to someone so "evasive and insincere".

>> No.6273668

>>6273653
>At no point have I said anything like this

>I mean I still think it's a belt