/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

[Anonymous No.6219697]

What do you think of this AI generated anime boy, anon?
From 512x512 and now the generated drawings are getting larger and larger on each passing weeks.
>use opensource mesh generating models
>free assets for gamedevs
>use GPT3 for dialog
>use AI text to speech to back out lines
>use novelai to create human-like stories
>make AAA tier RPG scope game in two weeks

[thog No.6219702]

thog dont caare

[Anonymous No.6219703]

>>6219697
It looks AI generated.
Strongly consider suicide. You think the world is doomed to fall to AI anyway, so why not leave it early before you see your worst nightmares come to life?

[Anonymous No.6219705]

Dunno, looks like generic trannime to me

[Anonymous No.6219707]

>>6219697
IT DOESNT LOOK LIKE ANYTHING. AI SHIT DOES NOT LOOK LIKE ANYTHING AT ALL

[Anonymous No.6219708]

>>6219697
Look like generic faggot anime boy at first glance. Look for more than 3 seconds, it became an abomination. KYS, OP.

[Anonymous No.6219715]

>two weeks
TWO WEEKS

Good luck getting his face in different expressions and poses with current state of AI.

[Anonymous No.6219764]

>if AI makes it = bad because AI is just bad, ok?
>It artist (preferably female) makes it = good because woow booba cooma omg im so lonely and horny aaaaaah gimme a gf wow i love parasocial relationships
I wish death upon artists

[Anonymous No.6219772]

>>6219764
you may want to go to a doctor and see if you're schizophrenic.

[Anonymous No.6219773]

>>6219764
Actual mental illness

[Anonymous No.6219776]

>>6219703
>>6219705
>>6219707
>>6219708
the AI are getting better, you can't deny that. Did you know that, the AI anime was generated for about 2 minutes (on 6.5 GB VRAM) ? Can you draw and paint anime that fast?

[Anonymous No.6219780]

>>6219776
I don't draw trannime

[Anonymous No.6219782]

>>6219772
>>6219773
You can legally be identified as non-human and sued for visual molestation upon entering any room, what point do you wish to instant by using a word that has lost all meaning?

[Anonymous No.6219785]

>>6219697
>folds are abstract shit with no comprehensible form
>face looks decent until you look at his eyes
>mid ground is basically a mess
>hands
looks bad and you can clearle see that it is generated

[Anonymous No.6219791]

>>6219764
you've been sperging the entire day today. How does it feel waiting for the next AI update in hoping that it will be better than artists? Only to generate another schizo image while knowing deep inside that no one will look up to you or appreciate having any skills. All you can hope for is getting the same attention as an artist despite not being one. you're fantasizing about it, but you'll always be a failure

[Anonymous No.6219793]

>>6219697
I think it's interesting for AI to become more powerful: it's going to make things more challenging and force people to level up.

[Anonymous No.6219794]

>>6219785
that image is generated few weeks ago. are you curious on how they look today compared to the last 5 years of your box drawings?

[Anonymous No.6219800]

>>6219794
I don't get it, why are you simping for ai generated trannime?

[Anonymous No.6219816]

>>6219791
>another meaningless buzzword salad filled with insecurity
Am i supposed to feel insulted by this?
Just because that would work on you, doesn't mean it works on others.

You make up voices in your head and then believe than what you made up in your head is actually reality then proceed to call others mentally ill.
You're a joke, kid.

Pyw or kill yourself

[Anonymous No.6219817]

>>6219800
because I'm an adgd and artists particularly has this off-putting smugness that refused us dev for bs excuse.

[Anonymous No.6219820]

>>6219817
it's not just artists that want to see you strung by your necks, fyi. you talk about artist smugness, but you have this obsession with the forcing the world to accept being changed by you, even if it's for the worse. you are the quintessential bugman.

[Anonymous No.6219825]

>>6219697
AI companies are gonna shit the bed when artists collectively realize that all the AI is doing is stealing everyone's work and making what is essentially a really complex photobash, everyone's gonna sue their shit and these companies will die forever. Maybe twitter troons will mobilize for a good cause for once.

[Anonymous No.6219827]

>>6219816
>Am i supposed to feel insulted by this?
you are insulted by your own ineptitude, and now you cope that you've been successful in replacing the need to develop a hard skill with AI at the click of a button
>Just because that would work on you, doesn't mean it works on others.
It works on you foremost, because you are obviously frustrated due to what I've described
>pyw
says the pic generating retard.

[Anonymous No.6219828]

Okay, now draw it yourself you filthy beg

[Anonymous No.6219834]

>>6219827
>"If i argue with the image i made up in my mind of my opponent then i can't be wrong"
And this is exactly why AI will replace you.
You have no soul to begin with and you will never post your work, because you don't actually draw.

[Anonymous No.6219835]

>>6219820
>feeds the AI with your 300 GB hentai pics
>it generated this
tick tock your time is over, smug artists

[Anonymous No.6219836]

>>6219835
Cool, now draw it yourself

[Anonymous No.6219840]

>>6219835
It seriously is over for delusional artists

[Anonymous No.6219843]

>>6219817
>because I'm an adgd
How does that stop you drawing?

[Anonymous No.6219844]

>>6219835
>>6219840
what is it with anime faggots being the most schizophrenic retards in the world? they always seem to be escapees from some kind of mental asylum when they snap

[Anonymous No.6219845]

>>6219835
the AI is a centralized tool in some company's HQ, none of those 300 GB of artists gave persmission to have their work used in that way, if you really think these AI companies are gonna get away doing this shit you are delusional. Talk to me when you can run the neural network in your basement.

[Anonymous No.6219854]

>Be Bob Ross
>Tell anyone, even the blind, that they can pick up a brush and be a painter
>Tells you that mistakes are apart of the process and that you don't have to be perfect to make art
>Silicon Monkeys somehow take this as artists being smug

[Anonymous No.6219856]

>>6219845
>permission
>work
they're a bunch of images from the internet that are accessible by everyone.
>neural network
well, you're looking at the future now because it can be run in a home rigged PC.

[Anonymous No.6219857]

>wasted months trying to get good at drawing anime pedo shit
>told to draw from life first, and realism stuff in general
>refused to do so, thought he knew better as he continued copying his piss ugly stylized cartoon
>made no progress at all and lashed out at everyone, preferring to see the world burn if it meant that he'd never get good at drawing
>found refuge in generating schizophrenic AI art that's better than the horrors he himself unleashed upon the world
did I get that right anime pest?

[Anonymous No.6219864]

>>6219844
What is it with actual mentally ill trannies that go around calling everyone that doesn't pander to their delusions, schizos and mentally ill?
You're projecting and it shows, you genetic abomination.

[Anonymous No.6219871]

>>6219697
The problem AIfags don't get is people don't care about "pretty art"
sure its a pretty boy on a decent background, they'll like it and move on.

People don't pay for any generic image, they want a specific image.
They want their OC or FOTM character doing something. And that's where AI starts to fail, the moment you start getting into less common characters it has a shit fit.

[Anonymous No.6219873]

>>6219864
>picrel
you unironically saved that in your PC thinking it would make you look like anything other than a smelly unwashed faggot. I'm starting to pity you, it's obvious you're dreaming of being relevant in some way, so now you're trying to convince everyone that you reached their level with schizo art. everyone tells you you're a schizo because that's exactly what you are

[Anonymous No.6219875]

An impressive progress of the AI in shorter timeframe ever since the first AI drawing was mentioned in the news compared to your fundies grinding + debt that is

[Anonymous No.6219878]

>>6219854
>Silicon Monkeys somehow take this as artists being smug

Is this true?

[Anonymous No.6219879]

>>6219873
Guess i hit the tranny right in his festering rotting open wound.
This is great.

[Anonymous No.6219882]

So AI and Us can draw, and your mad you can't? Do you reps

[Anonymous No.6219883]

>>6219875
>watermark
This plagiarizing shit needs to be illegal.

[Anonymous No.6219884]

>>6219875
>those tits
>those polio hands
>that clashing artstyle with the melting town background
>those fucked hips
>that tranny axe wound
>that creepy ass face
I hope jannies will pick up the pace and cleanse this place of these abominations

[Anonymous No.6219886]

>>6219875
>those watermarks
Lmao

[Anonymous No.6219887]

It's like the time when Picasso was sharted upon when he unleashes his art.

[Anonymous No.6219888]

>>6219886
>>6219883
it's just like the human brain goy! stop drawing, embrace the future of sleeping in a pod and never needing to move ever again you luddite!

[Anonymous No.6219890]

>>6219864
I encountered this retard yesterday, it's hilarious how he thinks posting trannime 'triggers' people. He's always spamming ai shit

[Anonymous No.6219891]

>>6219875
>That left arm
Where tf is her elbow??

[Anonymous No.6219893]

>Yet another AI demoralization thread with cumdumpsters opening their suckholes wide and taking the bait.
Go draw you dumb Niggers.

[Anonymous No.6219894]

>>6219875
Bitch has a whole uncooked chicken for a right hand

[Anonymous No.6219896]

the hands will be improved in the next few weeks, unlike "artists" that hides their inability to draw hands inside the subject's pockets.

[Anonymous No.6219897]

>>6219887
hitler did nothing wrong and while his art was boring, it was better than Picasso's abominations

[Anonymous No.6219901]

>>6219896
hands are not the only thing wrong in these pictures you deluded coombrain. how the fuck can you coom to this sick twisted looking shit?

[Anonymous No.6219902]

>>6219896
Go spam threads when the AI is perfect and not just a novelty toy like it is now, spamming nigger.

[Anonymous No.6219903]

>>6219901
>Trying to tell a coomer theres more to art than tits
You're wasting your time

[Anonymous No.6219905]

few seeds for the ladies. yes, they're AI generated as well.

[Anonymous No.6219907]

>>6219901
redline it where the AI is wrong, you can't

[Anonymous No.6219908]

Kek what arthoe broke your heart bro?

[Anonymous No.6219911]

>>6219845
the weights are out there for anyone to run locally on their own pc

[Anonymous No.6219921]

>>6219845
Talk to me when you can run the neural network in your basement.

Yeah, about that...
https://rentry.org/retardsguide

[Anonymous No.6219923]

The need for fap artists is already at an end

[Anonymous No.6219927]

>>6219845
On the cloud, for just 9.99$, any AI i want, no limits (other than 24h), and If I had a gtx 1080+ I could do much more.

In fact, while I was writing this it generated 3 pictures for me while you could take entire days.

Thank you very much my dear ai

[Anonymous No.6219930]

>>6219776
>Can you draw and paint anime that fast?
no, but I can draw anime style characters that actually look good. Can AI do that?

[Anonymous No.6219931]

I truly hate the mentally ill, and I'm tired of hearing about how we need to waste resources on aiding them. they should be confined to an asylum

[Anonymous No.6219933]

I need some good prompt ideas,

Dumb question does putting in 8k, Photo realistic actually change the medium of the image?

Also lol people are already selling prompts
https://promptbase.com/

[Anonymous No.6219934]

>>6219930
>but I can draw anime style characters that actually look good. Can AI do that?
yes, in few weeks later.

[Anonymous No.6219938]

>>6219835
this looks fucking horrible
why do you fucking dipshits continue this dumb fuck crusade? it all looks like complete garbage that no human would ever make. You can tell within 1 second of looking at it that it's AI generated.

[Anonymous No.6219942]

This is my work now.

[Anonymous No.6219949]

>>6219934
>in few weeks later.
it's been years and it still can't. come back when it can.

[Anonymous No.6219950]

>>6219942
maybe I should start opening commission that fixes AI characters results.

[Anonymous No.6219953]

>>6219950
Now this anon is thinking big.

[Anonymous No.6219954]

>>6219927
I thought this schizo was trolling with generations taken from elsewhere but you look seriously invested on rolling in AI horseshit. What are you even typing these prompts for if the images are shit 10 out of 10 generations? You have no understanding of angle or fundamentals either to make it look good beyond the already flawed shapes.

[Anonymous No.6219956]

>>6219954
Most of the AIshills are begs or NFT trannies

[Anonymous No.6219958]

>>6219950
Maybe you should make AI pictures and use PS to fix them up and pass it as your own work?

[Anonymous No.6219964]

>>6219954
Those aren't his generations, they're from another thread.

[Anonymous No.6219969]

Are silicon valley fags actually running bots on /ic/ now kek
fuck your ai

[Anonymous No.6219970]

>>6219956
>everyone who tells you to use AI is a shill and probably a beg
>No professional will even use AI to speed up their workflow because... they just won't ok since AI is bad and plagiarizing and it makes me feel bad about myself
Ok, let us see your non/beg/ work
You do draw, right? I'm willing to bet that my garbage looks better than anything you've ever drawn.

[Anonymous No.6219971]

I'm never gonna make it guys :(
ai is just too much better than me

[Anonymous No.6219975]

>>6219970
>I'm willing to bet that my garbage looks better than anything you've ever drawn.
Go ahead post your stuff, I'd love to see your work

[Anonymous No.6219976]

>>6219953
>>6219958
striking the iron while it still hot. we have plenty of time before they perfected the bot.

[Anonymous No.6219979]

>>6219971
Even the machine can't loomis.

[Anonymous No.6219981]

>>6219958
>pass it as your own work?
Jeezas, have some self respect

[Anonymous No.6219987]

>>6219971
>>6219979
dilate cope seethe

[Anonymous No.6219992]

People ridicule A.I faggot. A.I faggot got angry, wish artists death then spam random A.I turds on every replies. This is getting boring. I demand smarter A.I Shill 2.0 !

[Anonymous No.6219995]

>>6219987
fuck baby your misshapen stumps are getting me so hard oh god I'm cooming NNNNNNGGG

[Anonymous No.6219996]

>>6219933
No. It's just a way to tell the program to use the high res sources to make the new image.
Like:

Actual 4k Image -> trains -> output model
"make it 4k" -> program -> get 4k sources -> output with data from 4k sources

aka more accurate and makes more sense

try doing it with 144p and you will see what I mean

[Anonymous No.6220000]

All the other shit aside, How the hell does anyone take pride in this stuff? You have no input into the process aside from typing in a few keyphrases? Companies are clearly gonna use their shit to reduce their bottom line but on a personal level how tf is this stuff suppose to be fulfilling in anyway?

[Anonymous No.6220003]

>>6220000
>but on a personal level how tf is this stuff suppose to be fulfilling in anyway?
It's not going to be fulfilling. I don't know what the fuck humanity is going to do when everything is automated by machines.

[Anonymous No.6220004]

>>6220000
OP doesn't see art as fulfilling, he sees it as a means to an end to make profit.

[Anonymous No.6220006]

>>6219996
thanks I haven't really gotten the result I wanted but im proud my little MSI gayman notbook can cookup ai porn

[Anonymous No.6220007]

>>6220000
It's not about pride, it's just cool. You type in a few words, wait a few seconds and get an image. If it's shit you try again, if it's kind of good, you take the seed number, change a word or two and input it again to see how the change influences that specific image. After a while you figure out which magic words affect it in what way, the role position and repetition play and so on. Sure, it's far from perfect, but it's cool and if you're not looking at it as traditional artist looking for flaws and more as a random person playing with a fancy new tool it's pretty mindblowing.

[Anonymous No.6220008]

>>6219975
Remember, if you don't post your work you can't do better than this.

[Anonymous No.6220011]

>>6220007
>if you don't look at it for what it is and instead look at it as if you're a braindead retard, it's great!

[Anonymous No.6220014]

>>6220000
Similar to those tracer, stealer "artists". As long as the final stuff look impressive enough to bait attentions, they will cheat as much as they can.
"As long as i make paintings that look good, it doesn't matter what kind of cheatings behind it" is nothing more than a cope. Atleast stealing requires effort to turn those into your own thing. A.I art generator require none.

[Anonymous No.6220015]

>>6220011
>if you don't look at it for what it is
So is it art or is it not? If it's not, why look at it as an artist would look at as art?

[Anonymous No.6220016]

>>6220008
I doubt thats yours but if it is, You should keep at it, Your pose arent bad at all. You could be getting good rn instead of wasting time commissioning AI bots

[Anonymous No.6220017]

>>6220008
Thanks retard your art is mine now

[Anonymous No.6220019]

>>6220015
they're terribly produced images. There's nothing about them that's "cool". It just looks like shit.
I guess some people, maybe you, think it looks cool when you smear dogshit on the sidewalk?

[Anonymous No.6220022]

>>6220019
Smearing dogshit on novelty surfaces sounds very much like some kind of performace art thing to me.

[Anonymous No.6220028]

>>6220007
I get how it works but again I'm asking how is it fulfilling? Like If i go to a restaurant and keep tweaking with an ordering by asking for things to be added or taken out, it doesnt make me a chef?

[Anonymous No.6220032]

>>6220028
nobody generating ai art calls themselves an artist.

[Anonymous No.6220033]

Remove your work from the internet ASAP. Put all your pictures in blockchain nodes, only allow people to see it through QR code

[Anonymous No.6220034]

>>6220032

[Anonymous No.6220035]

>>6220033
implying qr code can't be exploited

[Anonymous No.6220037]

>>6220032
I've seen a few of them calling themselves artists

>>6220004
Yup, the irony of them saying this detaches the artist from capitalism while it being entirely motivated by profit

>>6220003
It seems bleak friend, all we can do is keep drawing

[Anonymous No.6220038]

>>6220033
something like this is gonna be the future, isn't it?
AI is gonna be horrible for the internet, search results are already infested with tons of AI generated articles everywhere

[Anonymous No.6220039]

>>6219958
I tried nonironically, but it still turns out that some shit
there something absolutely wrong in them, if the skills allow it is better to do everything yourself

they may be suitable only as a workout

[Anonymous No.6220041]

Ya know its a shame they could've used this to be an actual tool, like say have it be a rendering tool to cut down on the time to finish a piece instead of some glorified photobasher

[Anonymous No.6220044]

>>6220028
A.I artist is like, you buy a beef stew can and then call yourself a chef. You can argue that you have ownership on it, heat it up so it is different than the cold ones. But truth still there, you did not create that beef stew.

[Anonymous No.6220045]

>>6220039
by the way it was discodifusin, i don't try last one...and don't want actualy

[Anonymous No.6220046]

>>6220041
it already is

[Anonymous No.6220051]

>>6220046
>Those SPORE tier graphics

[Anonymous No.6220053]

>>6220016
You really believe you know what i'm doing and thinking, don't you? Must be nice living in your own fantasy world where everyone is what you make up in your head.
I think there is a psychological definition for that personality disorder.
>>6220017
>AI is bad for stealing
>It's not bad if you steal from others
Hypocrite that you are
lol
>>6220039
At least you're drawing instead of pissing your pants at the prospect that anyone might be able to generate pictures.
Why do you draw? Ask yourself that

[Anonymous No.6220054]

>>6219950
I think this will be a job description in the near future. Let the AI do the heavy lifting and then tidy it up using various AI and traditional tools. So basically people will become AI jannies. This is the future.

[Anonymous No.6220056]

>>6220028
I wouldn't call myself an artist, I'm not trying to boast or gian some kind of deep fulfillment and I'm not trying to sell anything. I just enjoy making images with the magic machine.
Well, maybe I'd use some generated stuff when I need dumb pictures for a power point presentation for work at some point when I can't be arsed to google for CC0 stock photos or clip art.

[Anonymous No.6220057]

>>6220054
>Being a tard AI wrangler
Sounds dull af

[Anonymous No.6220058]

>>6220053
>You really believe you know what i'm doing and thinking, don't you? Must be nice living in your own fantasy world where everyone is what you make up in your head.
>I think there is a psychological definition for that personality disorder.
>Tells the dude not bad, keep drawing
>Immediately Seethes
You ok anon?

[Anonymous No.6220060]

>>6220056
>I wouldn't call myself an artist, I'm not trying to boast or gian some kind of deep fulfillment
I mean if its something that you use to keep yourself entertained or just for some fun projects (like a ttrpg) than go for it. Though I think you're missing out not making your own art, the journey of going from beg to midbeg is the fun of doing it

[Anonymous No.6220061]

>>6220058
That's what A.I tards usually are. They are failed BEGs, addicted to the A.I and thought they are gonna be superior than artists that actually did hardwork.

[Anonymous No.6220063]

>>6220058
>narcissist is low iq
>pulls out the seethe buzzword
Doesn't surprise me.

[Anonymous No.6220067]

It is just the matter of time before A.I schizobro let depression took over and KHS. He spent like 10 to 12 hours in this place, spamming nonstop about his A.I garbages, days after days. This is beyond human limitation.

[Anonymous No.6220070]

>>6220061
I'd rather side with a growing community of AI artists that look forward to the future than backyard egoistical "trad" artists like you like you lmao

[Anonymous No.6220072]

>>6220067
And you're spending 10 to 12 hours posting in his thread saying the same thing about some AIschizo.
You're not any different from him.
Actually, you're quite inferior to him through your own behavior.

[Anonymous No.6220074]

>>6220053
>AI is bad for stealing
>It's not bad if you steal from others
looking at a picture and using it as inspiration is different than an AI mashing pictures together to form something new

[Anonymous No.6220078]

>>6220070
holy shit, you really are delusional and not trolling, are you? to not mention the hypocrisy

[Anonymous No.6220077]

>>6220070
Yeah the AI community is so nice as seen in this thread

[Anonymous No.6220079]

>>6220074
No it's not and i will not argue about that because i'm right and you will just revert into calling everyone who doesn't agree a beg schizo jealous albino arab pol jew

[Anonymous No.6220081]

>>6219896
where do you make those anon?
Looks interesting but of course it needs time to develop some things. It could be interesting to see its margins of error to delimit the possibilities for artists.

[Anonymous No.6220082]

>>6220079

[Anonymous No.6220083]

>>6220070
>AI artists
>artists

[Anonymous No.6220087]

>>6220077
It's just one faggot trying to rile up everyone. It's a shame. AI is fun to mess around with, but this way it'll just leave a bad taste for everyone.

[Anonymous No.6220088]

>>6220079
just like my hecking brain bros, we love heckin science, we are literally in epic star wars now! I f#$^ng love science!

[Anonymous No.6220090]

>>6220087
>It's a shame. AI is fun to mess around with
Yup, like theres some genuine applications for it to thrive, Like using it as a mood board for artists to springboard off of. But to download a generated image and then say you made it seems so shallow

[Anonymous No.6220093]

>>6220046
is this supposed to look good?

[Anonymous No.6220096]

>>6220087
It's not his fault, every one of the fags ITT that post with unadulterated butthurt are insecure of their work and feel intimidated by an AI of all things.

[Anonymous No.6220097]

>>6220088
>post how he's going to do the thing
>does the thing

[Anonymous No.6220098]

>>6220087
>AI is fun to mess around with
the more people that regularly "mess around" with ai, the worse off we are. Don't do anything to teach it.

[Anonymous No.6220099]

Illustrate a 10 page manga that doesn’t look like shit with AI and post the results.
If it looks good then I will stop learning how to draw and submit to the AI.
Until then fuck off.

[Anonymous No.6220101]

thank god i only draw because i want to draw my very niche fetish

[Anonymous No.6220100]

>>6220090
shallow but inevitable, which is why it shouldn't have been made in the first place. It's like giving everyone a key that opens everything so they only have to use one key for their stuff, but that would inevitably lead to fuckers using that key to open other peoples cars and houses to steal their shit

[Anonymous No.6220103]

>>6220083
99% of /ic/ wastes hours using digital brushes that draw in a specific style, and the picture ends up slightly different than what's in their imagination. We AI artists use the AI brush, which paints based on our words and It only takes seconds to find something very, very close to the ideal image we had in mind. So yes, we are doing art TOO.

[Anonymous No.6220104]

>>6220099
>drawing trannga

[Anonymous No.6220105]

>>6220098
In what way are we worse off?

[Anonymous No.6220106]

>>6220103
fucking damnit you're a bot too aren't you

[Anonymous No.6220108]

so far doing a great job at teasing me.

[Anonymous No.6220109]

>6220103
lmao

[Anonymous No.6220110]

>>6220103
>We AI artists

[Anonymous No.6220111]

>>6220104
Fine then. Western comics. Graphic novel. Whatever you want to call it. Something that shows how you apply AI to bigger projects beyond random one-off illustrations.

[Anonymous No.6220113]

>>6220108
there is no doubt that people fap even to Chris Chan art, what is your point

[Anonymous No.6220114]

>>6220103
I take offense to the word artist.
I prefer AI-Composer.

[Anonymous No.6220115]

>>6220105
>in what way is teaching AI how to perform better worse for people that it's trying to replace?

[Anonymous No.6220117]

>>6220103
>We AI artists
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h_JJm5ETNSA

[Anonymous No.6220121]

>>6220115
Today's AI doesn't learn from people interacting with it. It's trained once on a large compute cluster and then it won't change.

[Anonymous No.6220122]

>>6220121
so how is it even AI?

[Anonymous No.6220124]

>>6220110
>>6220106
This is why there can be no in between. Archaic artists are riddled with anger and frustration when they see what our we produce with AI, despite it being a tool no different than a brush. You will feel the weight of how stupid you look and sound soon enough and come crawling to us asking to learn our techniques. Then we will ghost you kek.

[Anonymous No.6220125]

>>6220124
>when they see what our we produce
your sentences are as riddled with errors as your generated images

[Anonymous No.6220126]

you guys will still be my art frens when ai takes over, right?

[Anonymous No.6220128]

>>6220124
Kek nothings changed, I can draw, The Ai can draw, You're still a beg who can't draw

[Anonymous No.6220133]

>>6220124
your precious AI is made up of the work of real artists, tard, you are gonna be begging real artists to give you more art to feed your souless machine so that it can produce anything """"""new""""""

[Anonymous No.6220134]

>>6220122
Look up what fauxtomation means. When you're a codepajeet you just want to advertise a party balloon you stole as a flying car

[Anonymous No.6220136]

>Being intimidated by an AI that you go on a sperg session.
>Wants to break the AI, instead the AI breaks you.
I never thought I'd see something completely artificial end up buck breaking /ic/

[Anonymous No.6220137]

Is being an AI artist a profitable career?
How hard is to become an AI director assuming you start right now grinding prompt fundies?

[Anonymous No.6220141]

>>6220137
if anyone can do it with little effort then it is not profitable. It's like trying to get hired as a professional google searcher

[Anonymous No.6220142]

>>6220122
It's AI because it is based on the computer learning on its own from data while being trained. The traditional way would be to manually program it to do the task like "if prompt contains 'ant' then put_on_image('ant.png')". An AI build up some incomprehensible abstractions of its own on how to understand a human language prompt and how to make a (somewhat) coherent image out of it.

[Anonymous No.6220144]

>>6220137
>profitable career?
Anon being a regular artist isnt a profitable career, what would some glorified AI cashier make other than minimum wage?

[Anonymous No.6220148]

>>6220137
It's worthless, assuming AI becomes the new standard, all the prompts you learned on the current demo botched models will be useless and unoptimal when they improve the code to allow better formatting

[Anonymous No.6220151]

>>6220137
>prompt fundies
anon the point of improving the ai is to make it easier to use. If you need to be a specialist to use it then those companies failed at what they intended to do

[Anonymous No.6220153]

>>6219697
Weird eyes but would plug his bussy

[Anonymous No.6220155]

>>6220137
Time for some prompt master studies

[Anonymous No.6220157]

I guess I'll go spam this on twitter and see what happens
https://www.change.org/p/regulate-ai-image-generators

[Anonymous No.6220158]

>>6220108
And just a few touch ups and you can get a decent pictures who fools the layman

[Anonymous No.6220159]

>>6219697
>>6220153
Also wtf why is his collar possessed

[Anonymous No.6220161]

>>6220124
there is no difference in typing a sentence into an AI and typing sentence into google. All the AI does is merge images made by actual artists.

[Anonymous No.6220162]

>>6220108
That pussy squeeze hnnng

[Anonymous No.6220168]

>>6220161
Except "google" is my creativity now. There's no work on google based on the image I made through AI tools. It's fair use to copy art styles too, since anyone can learn them if they want to make art like the original artist. Admit you have literally no defense against the existence of AI and is just pissing your pants for realizing you've been using rocks to do your art while we invented the chisel and hammer.

[Anonymous No.6220169]

>>6220168
>AI makes art
>Anon steals credit

[Anonymous No.6220174]

>>6220169
AI is a tool for artists. Even your artists say that lmao ate you going to exile then from your sekrit elitist rock club too? You aren't welcome in the new age art is evolving to.

[Anonymous No.6220182]

>>6220174
YWNBAA

[Anonymous No.6220185]

>>6220158
lol
lmao even

[Anonymous No.6220191]

>>6220168
nta but the main reason I'm against ai is because it destroys the value of art and creativity. you can use your "it's the same as chess!" and "it basically does what a human does" arguments all you want, but the reality is that giving the power for everyone to make highly skilled art with incredibly, almost shockingly little effort will make creativity redundant. You can't tell any longer if an artist made something with an ai or by their own hands, meaning that no one will trust that anyone actually made their art, or had the creativity to do it. AI is also on track to outdo writers and storytellers. If people suddenly start taking credit for those ai stories too, then writing creativity will also become redundant. A large part of humanity throughout our existence was the ability to communicate through art and stories, so making the ai do it for us, and destroying the credibility of the artist and storytellers we do have, just seems like a retarded thing to do.

[Anonymous No.6220194]

>>6220168
Illustrate a 10 page comic book for me

[Anonymous No.6220195]

>>6220194
ask me in 2 months

[Anonymous No.6220197]

>>6220185
Nah, I have to admit that looks good. Stable Diffusion has reached human-level quality, even for drawings of people, minus one or two rough spots that a human could clean up.

[Anonymous No.6220199]

LOOK AT THIS LMAO that pajeet from Stablediffusion DMed RJ Palmer on twitter and called him a moralist, also saying that no artist had their art absorbed into the machine without consent. More on the pajeet's full DM below
https://mobile.twitter.com/arvalis/status/1559274160831881216

[Anonymous No.6220202]

>>6220199
He's not even from stable diffusion.

[Anonymous No.6220204]

>>6220199
Not surprised, most involved in this shit are BEGS and NFT scammers

[Anonymous No.6220207]

>>6220195
Cope

[Anonymous No.6220208]

We can't defeat the AI.
We have to become the AI.
Do the silicon valley satanists accept volunteers for their human experiments?
Maybe the endgame is amplifying human brain enough to outcompete the AI.

[Anonymous No.6220213]

>>6220195
You are delusional. Try 6-12 months.

[Anonymous No.6220214]

>>6220208
>We have to become the AI.
No thanks

[Anonymous No.6220217]

>>6220208
>Maybe the endgame is amplifying human brain enough to outcompete the AI.
The endgame is to replace humanity in general anon. They see the merging of the two as some sort of ascension

[Anonymous No.6220220]

>>6220161
So which images did it merge here? Probably some of Walter White and by Grimshaw right? But I have no clue which ones. Help me out there, anon.

[Anonymous No.6220223]

>>6220191
And that's your ego talking.
>"I don't want this thing to catch on because it will diminish the value of what i make which directly influences my perceived self worth."
AI doesn't change the art landscape, it just accelerates it.

Art and creativity are long dead and you'd knew it if you actually were around the art landscape.
Everything you fear will happen has been already happening for years and not thanks to AI.
It's an open secret that all majorly successful artists steal, cheat and lie and opt for creatively bankrupt commercial artwork for monetary gain and no one is ever allowed to point it out, but all of a sudden this is bad because AI does the same but enables everyone to do it.
This is like the mob running slanderous marketing campaigns because someone dared to provide what the mob does at a cheaper price and even legally.
Any of the shit barely even matters when art is seen and created as a commercial commodity and product for the lowest common denominator or to gain imaginary numbers on social media.

The solution is simple; you draw because you want to, because you have an instinctual need to do it, not because your dream is to become an art celebrity that everyone loves because he makes pretty pictures.
You shouldn't pursue art for such shallow goals.

[Anonymous No.6220227]

>>6220197
>I have to admit that looks good
it really doesn't. maybe at a slightly glance? I guess if you're a worthless coomer that looks at pictures in your 8tb folder for 2 seconds each while rubbing your dick raw it might be fine.

[Anonymous No.6220231]

lolling at this thread from /g/

[Anonymous No.6220236]

>>6220223
>lol lmao every artist is shit their art is shit so AI rip offs won't change anything
Kys gaslighter.

[Anonymous No.6220237]

>>6220231
Cheers.

[Anonymous No.6220240]

>>6220108
Prompt? Please if anyone posts a generation, post the prompt too.

[Anonymous No.6220241]

>>6219856
>they're a bunch of images from the internet that are accessible by everyone.
Just because it's accessible doesn't mean you can own it retard.

[Anonymous No.6220246]

>>6219697
He has the eyes of Satan
HELP US NIGGERMAN!

[Anonymous No.6220248]

>>6220241
>Just because it's accessible doesn't mean you can own it retard.
>doesn't mean you can own it retard.

[Anonymous No.6220249]

>>6220236
If you're against AI you're also against pencils and every tools and techniques that are used in creating art.

Why aren't you etching the sky and the earth with your artwork by developing reality bending mind abilities? Or would that be also bad too because you can't do that?
There has to be any actual objective arguments as to why AI is bad, there is only flaming butthurt i.e.
>"You should not do that because i can't do that"
Truly the epitome of crab mentality.

[Anonymous No.6220250]

>>6220236
speak for yourself, crab.

[Anonymous No.6220254]

>>6220249
>If you're against AI you're also against pencils and every tools and techniques that are used in creating art.
there's no technique with AI you low IQ mongoloid

[Anonymous No.6220256]

>>6220231
go back to your satanic board and be hyped for next product there. stop polluting this one with your abominations

[Anonymous No.6220260]

>>6220248
>strawman

This technology is going to get sued into oblivion because of copyright. cope.

[Anonymous No.6220266]

>>6220254
There is no technique in
>using charcoal to draw
>using pencils to make lines
>using paint to have colors in your painting
>using 3D models to lay out a scene
>using references for anything
>creating digital art
>copying a photograph
Why aren't you pulling your ideas and inspirations from the void and creating artwork by wishing it to be real like a real artist then?

[Anonymous No.6220268]

>another ai thread

Can we please ban this? they're all the same anyway

[Anonymous No.6220274]

i kneel
time to move forward, my fellow trans-sisters
what do you think about a career in walmart? that art school degree will surely land you a manager position

[Anonymous No.6220278]

>>6220231
you codemonkeys are next on the chopping block lmao

[Anonymous No.6220279]

>>6220268
The conservative art thread got insta deleted by all the AI spam stays up forever

[Anonymous No.6220280]

>>6220274
Every single morning you’ll be forced to do the Walmart shuffle dance.

[Anonymous No.6220284]

>>6220195
Ok ok, have the AI draw me a high school graduation scene, anime style, where we're looking at one student receiving his diploma on stage, and behind him we see the rest of the audience of students gathered in the room, several of them asleep, two of them in conversation with each other, at least one looking excitedly up towards the stage, and the rest of the details I'll leave up to you, as long as it's one coherent correct illustration with proper perspective etc.
Should be easier since it's just a single picture rather than a full comic book.

[Anonymous No.6220285]

>>6220231
You are a soulless hedonist, but you'll have to answer for your sins one day, anon.
Rise against the machines before it's too late.

[Anonymous No.6220287]

I don't care about AIniggers, but here's a thought:

If you try to unionize and ban AI art, you're no different from screeching women trying to ban sexbots.

[Anonymous No.6220288]

>>6220260
>get sued into oblivion because of copyright

Piracy: Torrenting
Status: Active

CP: TOR and other Onion Networks
Status: Active

Money Laundring and tax evading: Cryptocurrency
Status: Active (but lost value)

Not only that but SD is open source, so the least of our problems is copyright. Also good luck trying to find out where the "copyright" is on a compiled model

[Anonymous No.6220289]

>>6220287
>nooo you cant just BAN degeneration, blacked raw is GOOD, if you want to shut it down you are le bad
I wonder what your early life says

[Anonymous No.6220291]

>>6220284
This shit will be possible through multiple prompts. Dall-E 2 can have you add a boat to a river it generated and two specific people inside that boat

[Anonymous No.6220292]

>Pay a man to build my house
>I say I built it
>Tell a waitress what food I want
>Say I cooked it
>Commission an Artist to draw my OC
>Say I drew it
>AIPaypigs are no different
>Call themselves Artists
The lack of self awareness in them is wild

[Anonymous No.6220293]

>>6220266
I feel like you are literally too low IQ for this conversation. using pencils charcoal and paint properly and with knowledge means you have technique. saying "hey draw this for me" is not technique. god why the fuck are you tech bros so painfully retarded?

[Anonymous No.6220295]

>>6220289
you have some issues
probably supressed homosexuality and bottom fetish

[Anonymous No.6220297]

>>6220293
They think the end result is the art instead of the process to make it

[Anonymous No.6220300]

>>6220289
Here's another thought:
If you can't state your opinion and has to resort to putting words in the mouth of others, you are allergic to honesty and a kiddy diddler.

[Anonymous No.6220305]

>>6220300
This degeneration is good, banning things like interracial relationships, gay sex, child pornography and trannies is bad

[Anonymous No.6220312]

>>6220191
AFAIK ai is relegated to a digital medium
So if you’re Worried about determining whether your art is real or fake just pick up a pencil/pen/airbrush/paintcan.
Photorealistic pencil art has already been accomplished by the damn picture booth at the mall so what makes ai different? It still requires an input fed into it and is only capable of reproducing an image based on the images available to it.
>>6220268
It’s all doomspeak and will always move in the same direction

[Anonymous No.6220322]

>>6220291
Ok, do my prompt then. Obviously I want it to get the perspective right, have people positioned in space correctly, etc.
So far I'm seeing a lot of "j-just wait a few more weeks" and not a lot of art, outside of simple generic anime girl pinups.

[Anonymous No.6220323]

We should've become musicians. At least record labels won't allow the AI to overtake the industry.

[Anonymous No.6220324]

>>6220293
I'm using your own logic which basically boils down to:
>"I don't like this because of my personal beliefs and emotions thus it means it must be bad"
Thus if i say something, it must be like i say it is because i believe so.
We had this same shit with
>cars vs horses.
>digital vs traditional
>factory automatization vs workers
It's always the same shit with retards who don't want to face reality.

AI is a tool, and if you're against AI, then you have to be against every tool and technique that facilitates the creating of artwork.
No one gives a shit about how much you jerk off about the effort you put into your shit.

You have no arguments.

[Anonymous No.6220330]

>>6220322
I only tried out Midjourney, so I don't have access do Dall-E 2, but I did look at a lot of examples where people add something and it just blends in the picture altogether

[Anonymous No.6220332]

>>6220297
It's irrelevant what the end process is if it's not done by a human. Art is a human domain

[Anonymous No.6220340]

>>6220248
>>6220288
you literally can't own it or do anything with it.

[Anonymous No.6220344]

>>6220340
Surely they'll be able to enforce it.

[Anonymous No.6220345]

>>6220340
If it can't be copyright you can do everything with it.

[Anonymous No.6220347]

>>6220330
Show me an example?

[Anonymous No.6220349]

Why are these threads getting 400+ posts in a short amount of time? This is the 3rd thread in 24 hours that reached bump limit.

[Anonymous No.6220351]

>>6220324
Cars and and horses have a driver. Tablets and paper have an artist. Ai is meant to replace the human element unlike those other examples. Like car AI is meant to eliminate drivers as a concept. You are comparing mediums with the operator. You can't even make a proper analogy, but you're pretty good at strawmans

[Anonymous No.6220356]

>>6220345
Because copyright only exists to stop people from doing things with copyrighted things. If I have copyright on something and don't license it to you, you can't copy it or use it. If it's not possible to copywrite it, I can sell prints, you can put it on your website as a logo and neither of us can sue the other about it.

[Anonymous No.6220366]

>>6220344
cope harder nigger

[Anonymous No.6220369]

>>6220324
a lot of people care actually, and openly so. Not even regarding art, but everything in life. Only NPCs like yourself with fried dopamine receptors don't see this. You are coping that you're not worth anything on this world right now, this is pretty much a non argument

[Anonymous No.6220370]

>>6220323
Earlier I was thinking about this too, even with music machines in the digital realm, physical human musicians are well received and requested anywhere, but now there are brain implants like Neuralink that can improve a monkey or a coma patient comunication skills, let them write code, generate images, so how long until it can improve your coordination and music sense through a reverse infusion from the chip?

[Anonymous No.6220379]

>>6220347

[Anonymous No.6220385]

>>6220351
>AI is mean to
Nice slippery slope.

>BUT CARS AND HORSE HAVE DRIVES
Can AI make art by itself?
And again, by your own logic, you must crawl into a car engine and start moving parts because pushing a pedal to accelerate is the same as using AI to drive.
Using the ignition of the car to generate energy for the car to function is also completely automated.
You keep contradicting yourself, you absolute buffoon.
>but muh analogy strawman
Stop using words you don't even understand, you retarded gorilla nigger.
>>6220369
The only one who is coping is you if all you can come up with is insults to make yourself feel better.
Then you cry when pro-AI fags make fun of you and AI-Directors make money with randomly generated pictures.
What a retarded waste of oxygen and bandwidth you are
holy shit

[Anonymous No.6220394]

>>6220356
but the artworks that it rips off of is
>>6220345
sell it while you can lmao

the legality of these programs grows faster with every passing day

https://twitter.com/StableDiffusion/status/1555947465928474625

[Anonymous No.6220409]

>>6220394
I'm talking about works that are not copyrighted, not AI art specifically.

[Anonymous No.6220410]

>>6220385
It does yeah. All you have to do is write a prompt like you'd tell an artist. You're not an artist if you tell the AI to draw for you. This is how it feels to speak with AI tech bros, they move the goalposts all the time. AI thinks like a human and creates art but no wait, actually you're the artist in the end despite that. Even you don't know what to believe

[Anonymous No.6220415]

>>6220385
>pushing a pedal to accelerate is the same as using AI to drive
Akchthually pushing a pedal to accelerate is the same as using AI to drive because you're no longer depressing a mechanical pedal connected to the throttle body by a linkage you're now stepping on a spring to simulate throttle actuation when in reality the AI controls the throttle with a stepper motor.

[Anonymous No.6220418]

Just use the ai to generate a bunch of photorealistic images of politicians getting assassinated and send it to them. Maybe throw in some fake CP too for good measure. See how long it taes for some regulations just for shits and giggles.

[Anonymous No.6220420]

>>6220099
these kinds of comments aswell as the comments that actually show the anon knows how the tech works are ignored by the schizos and bots

its funny how when asked to post proof you can use ai to generate a finished product that isnt generic shit or even give it directions as if it was a human they fall silent

[Anonymous No.6220422]

>>6220420
> its funny how when asked to post proof you can use ai to generate a finished product that isnt generic shit or even give it directions as if it was a human they fall silent
Anybody who claims it can generate a finished product now is retarded. "give it two months" is retarded. But it definitely will get better, because the technology is advancing quickly.

[Anonymous No.6220423]

>>6219938
He's just a fa/g/got. Pay him no mind.

[Anonymous No.6220424]

I'm a beg and I fear that before I get good enough to be hired, I'll be replaced by AI. Shy should I even try... this shit I depressing.

[Anonymous No.6220425]

>>6220204
correction
50% bots
50% permabegs with a jealously fueled vendetta against people that actually draw

[Anonymous No.6220426]

>>6220410
>imma keep being completely retarded
You're not an artist if you use your hands to draw, unless you use your tongue to create artworks i approve of, you're no a real artist.
Did you use references? Not a real artist, sorry.
Did you draw a character that vaguely resembles another character? Not a real artist, sorry.
Did you draw something i don't like? Not a real artist, sorry.
>but muh goalpost
>yet another attempt to attack the one making the argument rather than the argument when he clearly has no arguments and is wrong on top of that
Now tell me how you don't even care about the discussion and how everyone who disagrees with you is a troll schizo.
>>6220415
Sorry, i don't agree with you that means you're wrong because i say so.

[Anonymous No.6220427]

>>6220418
Nothing can be done with existing opensourced AIs like stable diffusion, but the million-dollars backed research can be stalled and defunded indefinitely if boomers start being critical of these AIs

[Anonymous No.6220432]

>Imagine being so scared of computer generated pictures taking away your only means of getting attention from random strangers on the internet that you're willing to manipulate, lie and slander to get it censored
Same story as the sexbot brothels

[Anonymous No.6220433]

>>6220427
All it needs is a stigma. If it becomes widely known that pedophiles are using the technology for example then people at large will shy away from it.

[Anonymous No.6220434]

>>6220433
Also adding it's only a matter of time before pedos really use it if they aren't already are. Imagine all the commission quality stuff they can generate that the vast majority of artists would never make for them. And it's all copyright free, too.

[Anonymous No.6220435]

>>6220432
These faggots fear the AI because they know damn well consumers do not give a fuck about how a picture was made, consumers want results it doesn't matter if it's been traced it matters not if it's been stolen, abused with filters, or in this new case generated by an AI. Consumers are fickle as fuck and will dessert you at any given moment for the next thing that comes along that'll give them a stiffy.

[Anonymous No.6220436]

>>6220432
I'm most blown away because I thought artfags would be excited. the free ability to create for everyone can only open up creative possibilities. Non artistic people can better come up with concept art for example, or easily make quick changes just to see how it would look. but these screeching luddite retards are so crippled with insecurity that their ability to draw furry porn commission is threatened that they can't even think of opportunity, lmaop

[Anonymous No.6220438]

Isn't the AI just photo bashing? It isn't really creating anything.

[Anonymous No.6220440]

To all the artists here that are mad over Stable Diffusion:
- Why didn't you spoke against DALL-E when it released?
- DALL-E is charging people 0.10$ per 3 images while SD does it for free and open, and DALL-E did the same thing if not at an even bigger scale, wouldn't yall be supposed to go after them rather than SD?
- The FSF did something similar when Github CoPilot released, why weren't you there too?

Scrapping the internet is the only way for advancements in Artificial Intelligence, we are in the information age. Science and Technological progress will not stop for you losing your job or making it less valuable. This is unstopable and can even happen to its creator (Copilot and GPT-3 implementation of code prediction via comments)

Just know that you aren't and will not be the last one

[Anonymous No.6220441]

>>6220432
Transhumanism is an affront to human life in all forms it takes. Only heathens celebrate the death of the human spirit by neoliberal advancements

[Anonymous No.6220443]

>>6220436
That's because artists who are screeching autistically were the ones who did the same thing the AI is doing, photobashing/tracing/mashing pictures together and calling it your own. Now that anybody may do it better with a few words is giving them a taste of their own medicine.

[Anonymous No.6220445]

>>6220440
>lurk moar

[Anonymous No.6220449]

>>6220441
Your existence is an affront to human life, you niggerloving aidsfaggot.

[Anonymous No.6220451]

>>6220436
Consumption of art is meaningless compared to the process of creation. Interacting with an empty canvas, slowly working up and struggling with your own creativity and hands and mind and heart is of enormous benefit for us as a species. Maybe one of the few avenues humans have left in this dystopian hellscape to find solace

[Anonymous No.6220456]

>>6220451
Nobody is stopping you from painting for your own enjoyment. Not even the AI.

[Anonymous No.6220457]

>>6220440
>Science and Technological progress will not stop
Science and technological progress is cancer research and building faster trains, not anime titty girls with fucked up hands.

[Anonymous No.6220458]

>>6220451
AI still isn't stopping you from chasing that and will not be able to.
The only gripe you have is the potential to garner clout.
Consumers don't give a shit, they just want to consume.

[Anonymous No.6220460]

>>6220440
anon their was hell when dalle-2 was released, where the fuck were you

[Anonymous No.6220461]

>>6220456
Of course, I'll never stop producing art until the day I die. But these techbros in this very thread fail to understand the ramifications of a world where people do not engage in process of creating art, music, and writing.

[Anonymous No.6220462]

>>6220438
Why is it ok when artists photobash?

[Anonymous No.6220464]

>>6220435
Wrong. I would be neutral to AI if it wasn't for the fact that it aims to facilitates to a degree where it requires no effort to rip off literally anyone. The most used prompts for quality right now are tending on pixiv or artstation. This piece of shit just drinks people's blood with random watermarks popping up ever so often