Anons?

[Anonymous No.6148420]

What do we think?

(Mods pls leave these up let's critique and discuss this artwork/artist)

[Anonymous No.6148425]

>>6148420
for what reason?

[Anonymous No.6148428]

>>6148425
Boota

[Anonymous No.6148433]

>>6148428
it's ugly and unappealing to anyone that's not overly enriched with melanin.
I'm confused why this deserves its own thread

[Anonymous No.6148434]

>>6148420
Niggerlips.

[Anonymous No.6148440]

>>6148433
Yep.

[Anonymous No.6148447]

>this thread again

[Anonymous No.6148453]

>>6148433
>>6148434
How do you improve it? Is it the colorscheme that is unappealing or the style?

[Anonymous No.6148454]

>>6148420
Could you draw her naked? I know you're just making these threads to shill yourself.

[Anonymous No.6148455]

>>6148447
Each and every time I want to discuss the art or the artist further it gets 404'd, this is a critique thread, pls give criticism on said art.

[Anonymous No.6148459]

>>6148420
Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. Anyone who tells you otherwise has no idea what they are talking about, and cave men from 1000+ years ago understand more about life than them.
This topic is useless.

[Anonymous No.6148461]

>>6148454
I'm not the artist, she has been drawn naked before but the kemono hasn't been updated in months.
https://kemono.party/patreon/user/11788774

[Anonymous No.6148465]

>>6148461
It appears I'm retarded and do not know how to spoiler tag but you get the point.

[Anonymous No.6148466]

>>6148453
>>6148455
>>6148461
I'm not spoonfeeding, you wanted an opinion and I'm telling you your art looks like garbage, past that it's your problem Mr. not the artist-kun.

[Anonymous No.6148467]

>>6148453
giant asses
giant lips
wide noses
freckles
very clearly referencing draenei and not giving them goat legs

[Anonymous No.6148473]

>the "OOOOHHHH JUST LOOK AT MY ASSSSSSEEEEETS" kind of character design
Im tired of this bullshit, it's shit for that reason alone, dont make me go discuss the color scheme, the bland, obviously-aligned-to-hedonism design choices and the art style not helping at all.
>b-b-but I want to discuss character design
Make it to the usual advice-seeking generak like fucking /beg/-/int/ and stop fucking spamming your shit as if it deserves it's own fucking thread ffs.

[Anonymous No.6148475]

>>6148466
>>6148473
Those are the other two forms, sorry I'm new are those colors better?

[Anonymous No.6148481]

>>6148475
I imagine this artist jerking off to jawbreakers or the spray can tool in ms paint.

[Anonymous No.6148487]

>>6148481
What's jawbreakers?

[Anonymous No.6148491]

>>6148487
my balls

[Anonymous No.6148498]

>>6148491
Now that you mention it tho there is quite a bit of freckles all over this OC and others he has

[Anonymous No.6148502]

>>6148498
they look awful and make the picture look flatter than it already looks without them.

[Anonymous No.6148504]

i don't know what you expect besides the "uuuh its bad because cooomer uuugghh, im such a anti-coomer ugghh" type of comments from election tourists

[Anonymous No.6148505]

>>6148502
So less freckles and less bad color variation

[Anonymous No.6148508]

>>6148475
>the same "look at my assets" character design on all of them
Are you really going to make me explain you what is so wrong about this design?
Colors arent much of an issue except for the right one since the presence of blue so abundant it lacks harmony. Art style is a debatable matter, but you can say it compromises the overall presentation to a considerable degree.

What really kills off all three designs are the design choices. Not only they show generic and bland that do little to nothing to portray whatever the character she is supposed to be, but the fact everything previously mentioned is foreshadowed and alineated by hedonistic design choices such as showing off her disproportionatedly huge asses and thighs, which really paints this designs as a very poor attempts to be something interesting hampered and sabotaged by pure hedonism coming from the author. I'd be forgiving if the characher's evident design choices were hedonistic for the sake of a good character design (like a seductive succubus for instance), but in this case, it is hedonistic for the sake of hedonism.

[Anonymous No.6148510]

>>6148504
What do you think of them anon #9?

[Anonymous No.6148514]

>>6148420
>What do we think?
i think this 'artist' is a nigger.

>>6148504
dornild grompf won 6 years ago, lost the second run and you shitlibs are still not over it. amazing.

[Anonymous No.6148518]

>>6148508
This is a good reply anon, thank u
>>6148514
I don't believe he's ever said his race specifically, in the vids he speaks tho it's a nasally white voice
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=-t-saBjWYbM

[Anonymous No.6148522]

>>6148505
personally I don't find extremely exaggerated proportions attractive and think the not-draenei would look better with a more realistic sized ass, or at least more realistically drawn. her ass looks fake, like she got really cheap ass implants with how they hang over her legs in every picture.

freckles are fine, hers are just overly done and very obviously placed without any thought put into where they should go. The only thought put into it was
>my have freckle fetish, put freckles on big round booty
It's rare for someone to have a fuck ton of freckles on their body, and if they do, it will be all over, not just heavily concentrated in small areas. She would have freckles on her back and a lot on her arms as well.

[Anonymous No.6148524]

>>6148510
too many freckles anon #10

[Anonymous No.6148527]

>>6148508
>hedonistic
So you're advocating for art that is not pleasing to look at? Probably not the word you wanna use there

[Anonymous No.6148535]

if you want (realistic) ass freckles, just do full body freckles.

[Anonymous No.6148544]

>>6148535
Just browse images here if you want a better idea of common freckle placements to make them look more realistic.
https://www.reddit.com/r/SexyFrex/

[Anonymous No.6148549]

>>6148527
maybe "hedonism" is not the best way to word it, though to be honest I cant quite find a more proper word. More or less what I mean by "hedonistic design" is that it's only real purpose seems to be to cast "lustful arousal" to the viewer and nothing more rather than conveying a message to the viewer about this character overall while being visually pleasing in any way it's supposed to be.
I dont mean the art is not supposed to be pleasing to look at, I mean that the character design shouldnt be *just* pleasing to look at, but also try and be a story of it's own. This is why I call it "hedonistic design", then again it may not be the best word.

[Anonymous No.6148550]

>>6148527
I don't think you know what hedonism is

[Anonymous No.6148555]

>>6148522
>>6148549
I think I understand what you're saying anon. The weird thing is that she wasn't always like this, the sexuality got amped over time just because he felt like he wasn't getting enough clicks otherwise. It's really pathetic to seem him post these webcomic update posts between the cheesecake drawings and seeing them get less than 1/20th the traffic, but at the same time he gets actively mad that people don't read his comics but then proceeds to lean into the sexuality. I think you're right, he can't have it both ways.

[Anonymous No.6148558]

>>6148549
Yeah I understand. I'll definitely have to keep this in mind when developing characters, even for coom

[Anonymous No.6148561]

>>6148555
she looks really frumpy. why would some overweight not-draenei get attention?

[Anonymous No.6148575]

>>6148561
Couldn't tell you, the dress one above got 10k and the one at the top of thread nearly 1k after an hour, I think he just gets shilled by popular artists, all it takes to get the ball rolling is re-tweets. What's frumpy mean?

[Anonymous No.6148628]

>>6148420
>What do we think?

this is fucking gross

[Anonymous No.6148639]

>>6148467
>draenei
poor anons forgot what game warcraft was based off of....

[Anonymous No.6148679]

>>6148555
>The weird thing is that she wasn't always like this
Damn, seeing the pic is kind of painful because this rendition actually lacks most, if not all issues I mentioned earlier. You can actually tell better what is she supposed to be as a character both on occupation/roles and personality.

>the sexuality got amped over time just because he felt like he wasn't getting enough clicks otherwise.
Such a shame, but I believe that only shows a poor handle of the character and the project the author is showcasing. The way I see it, he wasnt making his project any engaging to his audience and decided to attempt to lure them with the easiest of eye catchers: Coombait.
>but at the same time he gets actively mad that people don't read his comics but then proceeds to lean into the sexuality.
This only proves his way into luring his audience was a complete fail as his audience only wants to see his coom and nothing more.

>I think you're right, he can't have it both ways.
I dont know about that, anon. This stunt is something the artist had coming because of poorly handling his works. I believe there is a difference between "I want to see more of this character" and "I want to see more of this character's ASS", the artist wanted the former, but his methods only were going to assure the latter. You can actually make people genuinely engaged into your stuff, but that takes effort on making your works (art, story, character design, etc, layouts...) stand out on their own in a way people feels interested, with the occasional spicy thing as an easy "eye catcher" for good measure. This way assures people will come for the kinky shit, and stay for the actual content.

[Anonymous No.6148690]

>>6148639
elaborate what that's supposed to be if not a draenei.

[Anonymous No.6148787]

>>6148690
A regular ass tiefling?

[Anonymous No.6148802]

>>6148787
thanks, I never gave a shit about d&d really

[Anonymous No.6148827]

>>6148420
Why do you keep bringing this guy up? This is like the third thread about him (and Penny of the Dumptruck Ass) in about a week.

[Anonymous No.6148839]

>>6148827
Because as stated, nobody would respond but we got a good discussion going rn

[Anonymous No.6148840]

>>6148555
That's actually pretty sad. I read the comic. It's decent, but not great. It is in a very early stage, not much meat to really sink one's teeth into yet. I think it could be pretty good, given enough time, but the setting, story concepts, characters, and art aren't eye-poppingly, attention getting-ly amazing right off the bat. For all intents and purposes it's a fairly generic DND-esque setting. Penny herself as a main character is a somewhat standard plucky wide eyed youngster heroine whomst'dve wants to do the right thing and beat the big bad evil, and there really wasn't a whole lot of emotional impact put into the plot hook that kicks off the story. If he had put in more than just the absolute bare minimum of groundwork to really sell the story to the reader and make them care about what was happening, he might have gotten a stronger reception. Trying to lure in readers with Penny's dumptruck ass when the story has absolutely nothing to do with that just makes the situation worse. I'm supposed to actually care about Penny and her story, right? So why would shamelessly whoring her out with mediocre cheesecake accomplish that in any way?

>>6148679 has it right. If he wants us to fall in love with Penny as a character and the rest of the story by extension, the focus should be on improving the comic itself.

[Anonymous No.6148867]

>>6148839
>no responses
There were plenty enough responses, but it's clear that most people don't find it all that interesting, besides that one /pol/ack sperging out about niggers and race mixing because the freckles on Penny's ass triggered him.

[Anonymous No.6148870]

>>6148840
Excellent point other anon. I tend to agree that drawing a comic where the main protagonist, her sister, and one of the antagonists all rub each other down in OIL while at the same time attempting to establish the purple dude as a villain in the comic probably isn't the right call either? Funnily enough, the fact that he's getting with her like this here just implies that he's gonna turn good or join their party, imagine spoiling story elements through an ass massage comic.

[Anonymous No.6148892]

>>6148870
LMAO
Honestly, though, I got the vibe straightaway that Mr. Purpleguy was either not a full-fledged villain or would be a future party member just from reading the comic itself. He was strangely sympathetic, he never commits any really evil acts (minimizing bloodshed, punishing the demon for destroying the town, not killing Meg when he could have very easily done so) and struggles just as much as the MC does in accomplishing his goals. His portrayal was rather attractive and heroic from the get go.

[Anonymous No.6148917]

>>6148892
Which is exactly why Not Makoto exists, just to prop up the purple dude but making him look that much better by default, dude murders a family within the first 3 pages. "Gee, I wonder if he's evil."

[Anonymous No.6149424]

>>6148420
Kanekuo stop shilling your art here, you got your ass kicked out of /aco/ for the same reason.

[Anonymous No.6149426]

>>6148420
gave me a boner so pretty decent

[Anonymous No.6149427]

>>6149424
link to thread?

[Anonymous No.6149428]

>>6149427
Not anymore, but there were like threads almost on a daily basis "casually discussing" Kanekuo and it's shit.

[Anonymous No.6149438]

>>6149428
>search “kanekuo” in the /aco/ archives
>90% of the results are just begging for the paywalled porn and every image post has the same iphone filename like OP
Kek I bet those posts are by OP as well

[Anonymous No.6149462]

>>6148420
stop shilling your art here
you're retarded to trying to make artists your audience

[Anonymous No.6149572]

>>6148420
Stop those stupid bullying vendetta threads.