/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

[Anonymous No.6134785]

>Finally read the guide in the sticky
>6 gorillion of AI will replace artists threads on the catalog
Haha You guys are just...shitposting... Right?

[Anonymous No.6134792]

That should only affect you if you are one of those retards thinking you can make a career out of art (lol)

[Cope, you will never be AN ARTIST No.6135253]

>>6134785
5% is shitposting 95% scared that ai will rape them.

Yep op, read the sticky. Dont listen to ic, most retarded(braindead) board.

[Cope, you will never be AN ARTIST No.6135256]

>>6134792
If you cant even do this, what a loser.

[Anonymous No.6135275]

>>6134785
Honestly, the only people I could see it replacing are photobashers, or very, VERY generic artists that create a lot of incredibly samey stuff, *at best*. Or those people would use the AI to do their shit for them.
The thing about a neural network like DALL-E is that they're good to train at doing specific things with limited rulesets, but for something so general and with such a nearly infinitely broad range of rules (and rules breaking rules breaking rules) to the point that the existence of rules are basically nebulous guidelines, as art and design is, it would legitimately have to become a true general intelligence (or in other words, achieve sentience and sapience) to be able to create in the same capacity as a human can. It can't create at all, in fact, it can only mash together preexisting data it's already been trained on. The thing about art is that art has a voice, the voice of another being speaking its intent and feeling and personality to you through the things it creates. An AI can only splice together voice recordings semi-randomly and play them back at you.
Asking a neural net to replace an artist would be nearly as difficult as asking it to live in the real world as a human being would. There are simply too many parameters, too many variables to account for.

[Anonymous No.6135302]

AI will replace most of us someday, who cares. I personally tripled the female unemployment rate in some areas of the third world by making robots.

But you'll still get jobs, people want to hire specific artists for the prestige of it and weird parasocial relationships. If the field was that soulless we'd just have drawing farms in Vietnam with two hundred dudes hunched over cheap tablets in a basement drawing your commissions and photobashing concept art all day the same way Korean slaves do pretty much every animation since the 90s.

Plus I doubt the boomers in charge can tard wrangle the AI into drawing the very specific thing they want, we're talking about people who need help using PowerPoint.