Does this look like a tractor to you?

[Anonymous No.6125130]

I am trying to learn to draw vehicles in perspective, the teacher says to do simplified block-like drawings to start getting it.

This is meant to be a tractor, does it read like so?

[Anonymous No.6125134]

I guess, but nowadays I'd expect a tractor to have a covered cabin

[Anonymous No.6125136]

Your teacher sounds like a brainlet fuckwit because thats what every aphantasia NGMI says to do
No it doesnt look like a tractor it looks like constructoid cope

[Anonymous No.6125138]

negative soul...

[Anonymous No.6125141]

>>6125130
I mean Kind of. Once you get the wheels in there and remove the squares around them, then it'll start to look more like one.

>>6125136
>Your teacher sounds like a brainlet fuckwit because thats what every aphantasia NGMI says to do

Every teacher says to start off with simplified shapes when doing vehicles and other machines. It helps you plot out where to start laying everything in even if OP's doesn't look the best.

This is pretty basic stuff when you get to this point.

[Deus Vult No.6125147]

>>6125136
You will never gonna make it. Loser.

[Deus Vult No.6125148]

>>6125130
Based Robertsonpilled OP.

[Anonymous No.6125153]

>>6125130
yeah. I didn’t even read your post and my mind fill in the gaps for me

[Anonymous No.6125160]

>does it look like X?
Here's a better exercise: copy a picture of a tractor.
Then draw the same picture again, but using these cubes instead of detailing the forms.

Now you know how to construct a tractor.

[Anonymous No.6125162]

>>6125141
Of course every teacher says to do it, because theyre a fucking teacher, they failed at art and that was their only option left
>>6125147
The truth will set you free even if at first it makes you seethe

[Deus Vult No.6125163]

>>6125162
Never

[Anonymous No.6125165]

>>6125130
draw through

[Anonymous No.6125166]

>>6125130
Making that would take you 5 minutes in sketchup.

[Anonymous No.6125169]

>>6125162
>Of course every teacher says to do it, because they're a fucking teacher, they failed at art and that was their only option left

So then why shouldn't someone listen to a teacher on this especially if they show they have the ability to draw the subject matter?

[Anonymous No.6125170]

Is this a bit more presentable? I am struggling with the exercise ngl, I got 4 more of these things to make

>>6125148
>>6125141
>>6125134
Thanks guys
>>6125136
Why is that, what'd you recommend instead?
>>6125138
Yeah, I guess

[Anonymous No.6125171]

Oh Deere!

[Anonymous No.6125172]

>>6125169
If you really need it explained to you, you wouldnt get it anyway, constructoid

[Anonymous No.6125175]

>>6125166
>Deere!
Yeah, I am thinking the same but the teacher insists this exercise is a core fundamental that is too valuable because of being able to free hand or use it when designing

[Anonymous No.6125176]

>>6125172
So you have no actual answer then. Okay.

[Anonymous No.6125177]

>>6125170
use a real tractor reference
nothing about what youre doing makes any sense
real objects arent perfect boxes

[Anonymous No.6125178]

>>6125177
Yeah I know, but thats what the teacher wants rn, just basic, box like vehicles and nothing else, says the priority is learning construction and understand orthographics
it has 3 phases
1. Box like
2. More complex forms
3. Detailed
I am progressing through these phases each week, so next week it'll start looking more complex

[Anonymous No.6125180]

>>6125170
Because it is immediately obvious every single time without fail when a vehicle was drafted by a constructoid. All of the smaller details, the wheel hubs, the lights, windows, doors, trim and so on are drawn to fit inside the shitty disproportinate little boxes you drew, instead of being properly spaced . Also, it looks soulless every single time. My recommendation is to just draw the fucking tractor and quit being an autistic robertson about it, youll get there

[Anonymous No.6125182]

>>6125176
>why shouldnt you listen to someone who receives a paycheck based off your inabillity to draw
>why shouldnt you listen to someone who couldnt make it as an artist and had to teach instead

[Anonymous No.6125184]

>>6125182

You realize if you're a concept guy when your short little 3-month contract ends and you have no other skills you're finished, right? Do you know what some of these industry guys do in the meantime to make ends meet? They teach until they find something else.

[Anonymous No.6125185]

>>6125180
>All of the smaller details, the wheel hubs, the lights, windows, doors, trim and so on are drawn to fit inside the shitty disproportinate little boxes you drew, instead of being properly spaced
I think thats the point of the exercise tho, just to teach you how to move around in perspective axis in 2D
I can tell by the homework for next week that things start to look more complex and difficult, and week 9 they are making really cool looking and detailed stuff

[Anonymous No.6125187]

>>6125184
>>6125182
That Anon is right by the way, the teacher is Charles Lin and actually works in the industry

[Anonymous No.6125203]

>>6125187
I dont give a fuck who it is, these lessons are pure garbage dragged out to fit a semester

[Anonymous No.6125205]

>>6125203
Dragged out?
Bro, I am struggling to get all the work done week by week, I have to finish by the 28th and I am not even 30% done with all the workload, gotta figure out how to render spheres, and do like 5 A3 pages of sketches for clothing/fashion plus like 40 perspective thumbnails of environments

[Anonymous No.6125208]

>>6125203
You’re right about it being garbage but you’re wrong about those who can’t do, teach boomer logic. Such a concept doesn’t apply in the arts when your employment depends on how useful you are in each pipeline of the product.

[Anonymous No.6125218]

>>6125130
Don't listen to the guys telling you construction is bad, they're just butthurt because someone told them they should practice construction in an argument once and sometimes they spam the board with anime-themed anti-construction threads. Drawing from reference is also a good option, and you could try doing both and see which one you like more.

>>6125170
I like these ones, they're like little animals.

[Anonymous No.6125223]

>>6125218
Thanks Anon, I appreciate it
I'll try to make the next ones better

[Anonymous No.6125241]

>>6125187
just saw his artstation, he's... not good

[Anonymous No.6125255]

>>6125130
I was thinking more an old-timey racecar but sure

[Anonymous No.6125258]

>>6125177
>real objects arent perfect boxes
Nobody says they are
but any object has only 3 dimensions and therefore can be enclosed in a box

[Anonymous No.6125264]

it perfectly reads tractor to me op.

[Anonymous No.6125269]

>>6125241
Maybe one step up from the drawabox guy.

[Anonymous No.6125341]

>>6125269
>>6125241
I mean, he is a concept artist not an illustrator, the stuff he makes might not be the most polished stuff but the design is there and looks pretty rad

[Anonymous No.6125664]

>>6125182
>why shouldnt you listen to someone who couldnt make it as an artist and had to teach instead

This doesn't make sense because a lot of good artists do teach. Where do you think all of these courses /ic/ hoards come from? Even then OP is most likely taking a class where a teacher that didn't actually have any practical knowledge on the subject they teach wouldn't get hired for it.

[Anonymous No.6125673]

>>6125664
Its the same teacher from Feng Zhu's School of Design, or used to be

[Anonymous No.6125797]

>>6125134
Ye aint knowing what em tractor is son, ye should come to t'farm more often son

[Anonymous No.6125850]

>>6125673
So this is the power of FZD

[Anonymous No.6126589]

>>6125850
FZD CONSTRUCTOID CHUDS BTFO
How will they ever recover?

[Anonymous No.6128459]

Some more, gonna try to get Page 3 Done today. I can now see grids when I close my eyes

[Anonymous No.6128559]

>>6128459
And done, no more toy vehicles for me

[Anonymous No.6128724]

>>6128559
gimme the tractor images your using for and I’ll take a stab at drawing it too. I’ll post what I make and we can learn together

[Anonymous No.6128727]

>>6128724
I mean gimme the tractor references your using

[Anonymous No.6128733]

>>6128724
Sure, bro that sounds sick
I don't have any pics in particular tho, what I am doing rn if going on google and typing ''Wooden Toy vehicles/truck/jeep..etc'' having a look at the proportions of any that catches my eyes, then drawing it on paper and pen to figure out a simple shape that looks acceptable to me with squares, then doiing it on photoshop

Here, like these images for example
https://i.pinimg.com/564x/3a/2f/e6/3a2fe60793b91440cd9a196783dcd7dc.jpg
https://cdn.shopify.com/s/files/1/0373/7341/1467/products/TV427-fire-engine-truck-full-collection-parts.jpg?v=1628078923

[Anonymous No.6128736]

>>6128727
>>6128724
https://cf.ltkcdn.net/antiques/images/orig/272739-1600x1066-antique-tractors.jpg

[Anonymous No.6128760]

>>6128736
thanks. i have to go but i will deliver on my proposal and post what i draw some time later

[Anonymous No.6128761]

>>6128760
Sounds great, if you get lost or something let me know

[Anonymous No.6128765]

>>6128559
So this is the power of FZD I have been hearing so much about. Huh.

[Anonymous No.6128785]

>>6128765
Oh shit, CONSTRUCTOID CHUDS BTFO!!!
You've done it bro, you and your big brain, you've decimated the whole FZD Charade and the entirety of the concept art industry
There's literally no way to recover from this, you are a genius dude! Holy shit, You've made it!

[Anonymous No.6128791]

>>6128785
Thanks Brah. Took me 3 minutes.

[Anonymous No.6128805]

>>6128791
You are a amazing bro, fuck this shit. I am taking the 3DChadpill asap
Who the fuck needs to learn this outdated 2D piece of shit anyway! Its not like learning perspective by heart would help you sketch and design anyway, that's for F.A.G.S

[Anonymous No.6128812]

>>6128805
You are seeing the light now. Proud of yah.

[Anonymous No.6128816]

>>6128765
The fact I got a similar result to a 3D modelling software by hand/photoshop actually makes me happy
Next week we are doing some weird organic modelling thing, you'll see me posting about it

[Anonymous No.6128834]

>>6128816
Yes, that's a good thing. It just means when you decide to take shortcuts you know what to look for.

[Anonymous No.6128859]

>>6128834
Thanks, bro
Gonna go learn to render spheres now, then sketch 5 pages of fashion/clothing so I can finish before the 28th

[Anonymous No.6128865]

>>6128791
I love that stupid picture so much, makes me kek everytime

[Anonymous No.6128873]

>>6128816
I honestly think yours look better. More appealing light and camera angle.

[Anonymous No.6128879]

>>6128873
>camera angle

Not a problemo.
>lighting
Blender takes care of that.

[Anonymous No.6128880]

>>6128879
But you didn't. I don't even think you can because I have the impression that despite you know how a 3D software works you really can't use it.

[Anonymous No.6128887]

>>6128880
>But you didn't.
Because that wasn't the point?
>I have the impression that despite you know how a 3D software works you really can't use it.
I'm using it right in your face right now.

[Anonymous No.6128889]

>>6128887
So you are going to copy him? I think you are missing the point of what I'm talking about here.

[Anonymous No.6128904]

>>6128889
based retard

[Anonymous No.6128905]

>>6128904
does this make you happy ? add more?

[Anonymous No.6128923]

>>6128905
>>6128904
You just prove my point even more. You know how a 3D software works but you can't use even if your life is on the line. You can only copy it and try to hide behind 100 layers of irony, but actually do something superior to what OP did? I don't see it. Pathetic.

[Anonymous No.6128927]

>>6128923
Literally what? I did as you asked, idiot. Are you asking me to sit here and replicate what the OP did 1:1? I can do that, too, clearly. But what would I win? Internet points? The original point was a quick mock-up that looks similar in nature that can be made in 5 minutes or less.

[Anonymous No.6128948]

>>6128927
I didn't asked you to do anything. If I remember correctly this all started when I said I like OP better and you tried to copy him to prove something, I have no idea what, and I brought it up that if you can only copy him and not do something better you have no idea why I liked OP better. I honestly have no idea why you are wasting your time doing all this, and failing I mind adding since OP still superior, do prove something to someone who doesn't really care and never really showed any interest.

I don't know with who you are talking to or what kinda of conversation you are having inside your head, but if you really think I asked you do something I would take a few steps back re-read this whole thread and stop and think about exactly you are doing here. Is almost creepy in my opinion, this is a 20 min conversation, I really don't know how you can distort your memories in such short period of time.

[Anonymous No.6128951]

>>6128948
okay, whatever.

[Anonymous No.6129004]

>>6125130
Is it at Brainstorm ? Keep it up

[Anonymous No.6129028]

>>6128873
Thanks, Anon
>>6129004
Nah, just doing it on my own with pirated vids, scott Robertson's books, Peter Hans stuff, Charles lin vids from patreon..etc
Basing my schedule off Iris Hoppers (some chick that went to FZD and let us look into the entire 3 terms homework, god bless her).

https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/0Bz2oiGlP6fo2ekZfTXJQem9ZVDQ?resourcekey=0-Ka2lyItTJcp35l46Mb35Ag

[Anonymous No.6129167]

constructoid shit always looks so fucking bland boring soulless. good thing these eggheads are being replaced by AI. only real artists with actual souls and something to express will survive. good luck paying back those student loans you racked up at some art school when your heartless overly technical drawings are being shit out by a computer LMAO

[Anonymous No.6129244]

>>6125341
It's 98% 3D btw.

[Anonymous No.6129313]

This is the crabbest /ic/ thread in a while

[Anonymous No.6132439]

>>6125130
yes. good proportions anon

[Anonymous No.6132501]

>>6125180
pyw retard

[Anonymous No.6132570]

>>6125130
Yes it does look like a tractor.

[Anonymous No.6134066]

>>6132570
>>6132439
Thanks guys
Trying to figure our spheres atm, you guys these think like spheres? feel like something is missing

[Anonymous No.6134077]

>>6134066
>Think like spheres
Damn brainfarts. I meant ''Look like spheres''