[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

View post   
File: 78 KB, 850x400, interestingartquote.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6076925 No.6076925 [Reply] [Original]

Found this interesting coming from a master like Ingres

>> No.6076929
File: 109 KB, 961x1177, FRY7FFcVEAAEbDK.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6076929

>>6076925
its retarded, old masters would have been making digital art alongside trad if they lived in our current day, and there are complex nuances to learning both trad and digital. some of you trad fags need to drop this superiority complex and embrace new ways of creating art.

>> No.6076931

>>6076925
HOLY SHIT INGRES PREDICTED DIGITAL
also no, not true. learning art traditionally vs digitally takes about the same amount of time. The only time it really deviates is learning the tools of the trade, such as the different types of paints or pencils for traditional, or how a software works on digital

>> No.6076932

>>6076925
you and everyone else who says this shit can't make appealing paintings even if your lifes depended on it, 2 completely different things retard

>> No.6076935

It takes 10 seconds to learn Dall-e 2 or Imagen.

>> No.6076942

>>6076925
if that's true how come no one here can draw?

>> No.6076960

>>6076925
Didn't he live in the 1500s or something? I don't think they had digital back then

>> No.6076963
File: 14 KB, 255x247, 1604202341398.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6076963

>>6076960
HAHAHA GOTCHA YA FELL FOR IT YA BUM

>> No.6076965

>>6076925
Trad takes skill, digital takes time. - Leonardo of Vinci

>> No.6076968

>>6076960
nah he was from thr 1800s. They had digital by then.

>> No.6076981

it's true
https://youtu.be/NtCPfIU1wH4

>> No.6077009
File: 583 KB, 1047x658, file.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6077009

>>6076981
this guy is better than 100% of /ic on his first attempt at digital wtf
I'm feeling weak digitalbros

>> No.6077015

>>6077009
>asian jeans

>> No.6077021

>>6077015
unironically asian genes, the guy is one foot in the grave can't even hold the pencil steady anymore and still able to paint that well

>> No.6077845
File: 1.35 MB, 2047x3364, Ingres,_Napoleon_on_his_Imperial_throne.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6077845

>>6076932
>you and everyone else who says this shit can't make appealing paintings even if your lifes depended on it

is this not appealing?

>> No.6077848

>>6076929
they'd be rolling in digital like pigs in mud

>> No.6077885

>>6076929
Old masters would be working at a Mcdonalds, doing something totally unrelated to art and commissioning furry art or browsing /ic/ trying to learn art without having the time and resources to do so.

>> No.6077936

>>6077845
composition is boring and everything color related is worse

>> No.6077974

>>6077845
the head looks like it was just photoshopped on. The pose is also really boring. This looks like a portrait that was commissioned by the king that would've just been a picture using the best camera quality in today's age. There's nothing creative about it, nor does it have a statement.

>> No.6078089
File: 267 KB, 1200x640, file.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6078089

>>6076925
Sorry I think I subscribe more to Michelangelo's school of thought

>> No.6078094

>>6078089
this was uncalled for!

>> No.6078133

>>6078089
That quote... No idea how people can understand italian, looks like a difficult language to learn.

>> No.6080000

>>6077845
as someone who draws 2 hours every 6 months i can tell you that this painting is stupid, dumb, and stupid and i could easily make something better in 2 minutes, trust me folks

>> No.6080005

>>6080000
I was actually wondering if anyone else was going to pick up on that it looks gay and permabeg and stupid before I said something!

>> No.6080687

>>6080000
quads don't lie

>> No.6080762

>>6076960
ofc they did. Why would he say that if digital didnt exist?

>> No.6081660

>>6076960
>realism is the highest form of art
get better taste and kys normalfag

>> No.6082158

>>6076929
No, it is more like others back then who could not become artists in their time could be artists today. While old masters would not be supported to pursue art. Artists today are of very different temperament to most of the old masters.
And even if they would be seasonal trend-hopping, anime-watching, game-playing digital artists on twitter, how does that have anything to do with something taking more time to learn than another?