Powerful

[Anonymous No.5213973]

Powerful

[Anonymous No.5213976]

>>5213973
That apple still looks pretty good for being 200 years old desu

[Anonymous No.5213985]

>>5213973
its funny cuz 1917 painting looks the best, and 2017 apple looks the best visually. cope harder.

[Anonymous No.5213991]

I'm not gonna pretend I think the 2017 painting is good, but the 1817 one is fucking boring. If I passed it in a museum I wouldn't give it a second's thought. But it has le correct anatomy so of course /ic/ must defend it.

[Anonymous No.5213995]

>>5213985
Yeah, the 1917 painting looks the best

[Anonymous No.5214007]

it’s kinda amazing that you can perfectly tell what 2017 is, isn’t it
the human mind is just so good at recognising patterns or whatever is at work here
makes me wonder how far you’d need to shit on accurate portrayal of a human in order for the brain not to pick it up immediately

[Anonymous No.5214096]

>>5213973
all 3 are fucking boring tho

[Anonymous No.5214146]

>>5213991
if I saw the 1917 or 2017 one in a museum I wouldn't give a second thought either faggot

[Anonymous No.5214167]

>>5213991
>>5214096
Go play videogames if you want some fun

[Anonymous No.5214174]

>>5214146
>if i saw the 1917 one in a museum I'd nervously walk by it because it's skill intimidates me
that's unfortunate anon, just accept that there are better artists than you

[Anonymous No.5214191]

>>5214167
are you implying that art as to boring?

[boxman No.5214194]

art history is a conversation

If all of art history, was classical, it would be boring. Conversations change topics, change focus, and contributions are considered meaningful if they are on topic.

anything looks stupid and autistic when you pose it this way like OP did.

WHY ARE WE TALKING ABOUT THE WEATHER TODAY WHEN YESTERDAY WE
WERE TALKING ABOUT ANIMALS

because the topic has shifted you shitstain, whatever is popular ultimately dominates, our topic of conversation is currently ANIME.

please make posts relevant to the topic.

[Anonymous No.5214622]

>>5213973
The only issues you could find there are that:
- Due to the internet and communication in general improving, more people can dabble into art, and also showcase their creations to a wider audience than artists back then
- Due to photography becoming a thing and postmodernism (which is a devil in and of itself)'s influence, many artists now pursue to depict abstractions and subjective things, not explicit and objective things like people, landscapes or what have you
Neither mean that the kind of art made on the left (or in the middle for that matter) stopped being made. Hell, look at Proko, or the Watts Atelier, they're making academic knowledge more accessible than it ever would've been one or two hundred years ago. If you're looking for art with that kind of technical rigor, it's out there, you just have to know where to look. But if you just wanna bitch about how all art nowadays isn't like atelier art, I can't help you there.

[Anonymous No.5214636]

>>5214194
every time I here an explanation of something from a fine arts perspective it always just sounds like a massive cope.

[Anonymous No.5214843]

>>5213973
hot take:
they're all trash because they're just a dude sitting there doing nothing

[Anonymous No.5214859]

>>5214174
Begone, cumfarti!

[Anonymous No.5215715]

>>5213991
Leave this board than ngmi

[Anonymous No.5215729]

>>5213991
I would give it a second thought because of the colors. It has that quake mood in the coloring and I am currently working on a project inspired from quake and taking note of how the texturing is made in the painting might help me be inspired outside of quake while maintaining the same feel. My point is if you only view art through the lens of "le correct anatomy" you might miss details that could be usefull.

[Anonymous No.5215762]

>>5214174
ahooooooooooga

[Anonymous No.5217089]

>>5213973
the latter two should be photographs

[Anonymous No.5217117]

>>5213973
How did that apple last for 2 centuries?

[Anonymous No.5217144]

>>5217117
that's how long apples lasted before artificial fertilizers

[Anonymous No.5217351]

>>5214194
are you making the point that context make the pieces more interesting? which I agree it does, but it is possible for a work to be interesting even without context.

[Anonymous No.5217699]

>>5213973
>muh realism best
we have cameras for that now retard

[Anonymous No.5217753]

>>5213973
seems like u need this bro

[Anonymous No.5219169]

>>5214174
lol, whatever helps you sleep at night bro

[Anonymous No.5219181]

powerful

[Anonymous No.5219192]

>>5213973
>1817
well done, but boring and forgettable
>1917
wonky, but interesting
>2017
straight garbage

[Anonymous No.5219202]

>>5214194
your post is too high effort for a board full of coomers and boomers

[Anonymous No.5219235]

>>5214194
Are you actually trying to suggest the artistic topic of conversation of our current cultural epoch is anime? If you're just talking about just 4chan then fair enough, but if you're talking more generally, I think you need to wake up and smell the coffee...

[Anonymous No.5219237]

>>5214194
Are you actually trying to suggest the artistic topic of conversation of our current cultural epoch is anime? If you're talking about just 4chan then fair enough, but if you're talking more generally, I think you need to wake up and smell the coffee...

[Anonymous No.5219995]

>>5213973
This stuff annoys me because I was in an art school and no one would take me serious if I painted like in the middle and the right

[Anonymous No.5220514]

>>5213985
>its funny cuz 1917 painting looks the best, and 2017 apple looks the best visually. cope harder.

kek

[Anonymous No.5220572]

>>5213985

[Anonymous No.5221099]

>>5213973
from souless to soul

[Anonymous No.5221977]

>>5213973
GREAT AND POWERFUL TRIXIE!!!

[Anonymous No.5222603]

>>5213973
Looks like 1867 looks the best.

[Anonymous No.5222610]

>>5213991
are you retarded