Portrait references

[Anonymous No.5189819]

Fuck it, portrait thread
Post refs, share works, fuck bitches, get money

[Anonymous No.5189821]

[Anonymous No.5189823]

[Anonymous No.5189826]

[Anonymous No.5189828]

[Anonymous No.5189830]

[Anonymous No.5189833]

[Anonymous No.5189834]

>>5189819
this thread is going to die almost immediately
I tried doing one of these years ago and the same shit happened
everyone here draws anime shit and skips portrait studies

[Anonymous No.5189837]

[Anonymous No.5189838]

>>5189834
youve gotta have faith anon

[Anonymous No.5189839]

[Anonymous No.5189840]

[Anonymous No.5189842]

[Anonymous No.5189844]

[Anonymous No.5189846]

[Anonymous No.5189850]

[Anonymous No.5189851]

>>5189819

[Anonymous No.5189852]

[Anonymous No.5189853]

[Anonymous No.5189854]

[Anonymous No.5189855]

[Anonymous No.5189856]

[Anonymous No.5189857]

[Anonymous No.5189858]

[Anonymous No.5189862]

[Anonymous No.5189863]

[Anonymous No.5189864]

[Anonymous No.5189865]

[Anonymous No.5189868]

[Anonymous No.5189870]

[Anonymous No.5189872]

[Anonymous No.5189875]

[Anonymous No.5189879]

[Anonymous No.5189882]

[Anonymous No.5189885]

[Anonymous No.5189888]

[Anonymous No.5189891]

[Anonymous No.5189892]

>>5189853
>necc

>neeeeck

[Anonymous No.5189894]

[Anonymous No.5189896]

[Anonymous No.5189899]

[Anonymous No.5189903]

[Anonymous No.5189909]

[Anonymous No.5190016]

[Anonymous No.5190022]

these posts would be better if you were only allowed to post a portrait with a study with it on the side

[Anonymous No.5190085]

[Anonymous No.5190244]

[Anonymous No.5190555]

>>5189834
I only draw anime portraits. I've been Procrastinating doing real ones because google only shows shit portraits but i think I'll do some now because of this thread so thank you op and every one who posted. If this thread is still alive when I'm done I'll post my work.

[Anonymous No.5191513]

>>5189819
Guess I'll go first then, did these today,
Also fuck you anon >>5189834 you got me to post out of spite

[Anonymous No.5191527]

So what is your endgame if you're a portraitfag? I'm only ever interested in drawing heads and at most shoulder/neck and that's all. The human body is uninteresting. However, what is the peak of portrait drawing in your opinion? Drawing from imagination, drawing from ref but in your own style, caricatures? etc

[Anonymous No.5191573]

>>5191527
having sex and then cumming

[Anonymous No.5191576]

[Anonymous No.5191577]

>>5191576

[Anonymous No.5191579]

>>5191577

[Anonymous No.5191581]

>>5191579

[Anonymous No.5191582]

>>5191581

[Anonymous No.5191583]

>>5191582

[Anonymous No.5191584]

>>5191583

[Anonymous No.5191585]

>>5191584

[Anonymous No.5191586]

>>5191585

[Anonymous No.5191601]

>>5189819
>fuck bitches, get money
what are you on about faggot

[Anonymous No.5191662]

>>5191527
building a mental familiarity with the head and it's many shapes and forms it can come in

[Anonymous No.5191933]

[Anonymous No.5191955]

>>5191527
Producing a work that has more visual appeal than your reference while maintaining accuracy. It's easy to make mediocre drawings/paintings of cute pinterest girls, but how often can you do that and confidently say "Yep, my version is definitely better."? For me, the answer is almost never.

[Anonymous No.5192015]

>>5191601
Fuck bitches. Get money.

Does it really need to be spelled out for you?

[Anonymous No.5192467]

>>5189819

[Anonymous No.5192508]

[Anonymous No.5194673]

[Anonymous No.5196028]

[Anonymous No.5196568]

>>5189833

[Anonymous No.5197125]

>>5189839
Mulattos are the most attractive race.

[Anonymous No.5197136]

>>5189833

[Anonymous No.5197616]

>>5191513
good ones, I liked.

[Anonymous No.5197795]

>>5189899
>>5191933

[Anonymous No.5197829]

Tfw you are an incel coomer and just get boners just by seeing foids pics

[Anonymous No.5197835]

cool idea. didn't knew you could shitpost like that here

[Anonymous No.5198250]

[Anonymous No.5198251]

[Anonymous No.5198532]

[Anonymous No.5198692]

>>5197829
Do you ever take a break from being bitter?

[Anonymous No.5198800]

[Anonymous No.5199080]

>>5189819
Kawai

[Anonymous No.5199097]

>>5191581

[Anonymous No.5199122]

>>5197136
nice, do you trace the reference from the program or do you actually draw it?

[Anonymous No.5199126]

y'all uploading faces without expresion, everyone in this thread is going to end up samefacing every portrait they draw

[Anonymous No.5199131]

>>5198800
oh god she is so beaiful i want to make babies with her

[Anonymous No.5199198]

>>5199122
i draw it.
I have the reference inside the file, right next to where I'm drawing and draw it using the sight-size method.

[Anonymous No.5199211]

>>5199097
very cool

>>5189909
>>5197835
>>5198800

[Anonymous No.5199244]

[Anonymous No.5199317]

>>5199131
Summer de Snoo was 9 yo when posted that pic. But don't worry, she's already 11 yo

[Anonymous No.5199430]

[Anonymous No.5200505]

>>5197795
you did it, bro

[Anonymous No.5200508]

>>5199317
Noooo, she is getting ugly

[Anonymous No.5200673]

[Anonymous No.5200979]

>>5200508
heh. but unironically, this

[Anonymous No.5201138]

>>5200508
kek, you are not wrong, I did save the first ref but not the second

[Anonymous No.5201577]

>>5190085
giraffe

[Anonymous No.5201596]

[Anonymous No.5201598]

[Anonymous No.5201600]

[Anonymous No.5201601]

[Anonymous No.5201602]

[Anonymous No.5201607]

[Anonymous No.5201786]

>>5189865
ended up missing the mark a bit but it was fun

[Anonymous No.5201804]

>>5201600
to imagine she is probably dead of old age, aah but the innocence of a child is eternally captured in that moment

[Anonymous No.5201964]

>>5201786
really nice work dude, that was actually one of the ones i wanted to do too

[Anonymous No.5201970]

>>5191576
>>5191577
>>5191581
>>5191582
>>5191584
>>5191586
what the fuck man I just started watching this series

[Anonymous No.5201981]

Reminder: none of these references are drawable without an intimate knowledge of FACIAL ANATOMY and MALE/FEMALE DIMORPHISM, unless you enjoy wasting your time to create uncanny valley caricatures

Put in the hours anon, do it for yourselves!

[Anonymous No.5201988]

>>5201981
it depends on what kind of results are you going for. eg. photorealism requires ZERO anatomy knowledge, but a ton of autism. normies seem to love it

[Anonymous No.5202901]

>>5189855
Wtf is that Morshu

[Anonymous No.5203877]

>>5189839
>>5192467
>>5199317
it seems i'm the only one doing this but okay

[Anonymous No.5204787]

...

[Anonymous No.5204806]

ngmi thread

[Anonymous No.5204840]

>>5191513
>>5199244
>>5200673
>>5204787
get a tablet

[Anonymous No.5204985]

>>5199131
She is ugly anon

[Anonymous No.5204987]

>>5204840
I'm not a brainless consumer, tablets are so overrated and useless

[Anonymous No.5204990]

>>5204985
>>>/hm/
>>5204987
ngmi

[Anonymous No.5204992]

>>5204990
pyw, i know u wont

[Anonymous No.5205021]

>>5204987
tradchad

[Anonymous No.5205166]

>>5204840
I have one.

[Anonymous No.5205330]

>>5205166
then use it, for fuck's sake
no client is gonna pay you for ballpoint drawings on an old notebook

[Anonymous No.5205340]

>>5205330
>he doesn't know

[Anonymous No.5205343]

>>5191662
This desu

[Anonymous No.5205349]

Also thanks OP I lost my previous portrait collection I got from ic back in 2018

[Anonymous No.5205772]

>>5205330
Who says I don't?

[Anonymous No.5205926]

Lazy freehand

[Anonymous No.5205927]

>>5205926

[Anonymous No.5207003]

[Anonymous No.5207005]

>>5205927
stop leaving cum in ur papers

[Anonymous No.5207113]

what's a good source to learn facial anatomy from?

[Anonymous No.5207320]

>>5205926
being lazy won't make you improve at anything

[Anonymous No.5207437]

>>5207005
I draw by dipping my prince albert in an inkwell. The occasional splash of semen upon a stroke of the penis just a bonus.

It's coffee you dumbass

[Anonymous No.5207441]

>>5207437
coffee is plant cum

[Anonymous No.5208504]

[Anonymous No.5208913]

>>5189834
not everyone posts their shit, we're here to collect the references or share pretty images we found

[Anonymous No.5209248]

[Anonymous No.5209428]

>>5204840
GeT A TaBlEt!!!!!
faggot

[Anonymous No.5209430]

>>5205330
cry more

[Anonymous No.5210910]

[Anonymous No.5210916]

>>5210910
let it die already

[boxman No.5210920]

>>5189850
>>5189837
>>5189823
>>5189857
>>5189858
>>5190016
>>5191581
>>5191933
>>5201607
10/10 will draw

[boxman No.5210966]

[Anonymous No.5210977]

>>5210966
get a tablet

[boxman No.5210982]

>>5210977

que veux-tu dire?

[Anonymous No.5210987]

>>5189819

[Anonymous No.5210991]

>>5210982
get gud

[Anonymous No.5210994]

>>5210987
Juli3p

Se taringueo el asunto

[boxman No.5210998]

>>5210977
non peut-être, c'est vous qui devriez arrêter de forcer un mème. traditionnel et numérique vont de pair, l'un complimente l'autre, seul un vrai professionnel qui maîtrise les deux esthétiques traditionnelles peut maîtriser le numérique. alors arrêtez de dire "allez acheter une tablette" vous êtes de la racaille.

[Anonymous No.5211009]

>>5210994
storm of facha

[Anonymous No.5211071]

>>5210916
youre right man lets get another 10 asian jeans threads going

[Anonymous No.5211659]

>>5210998
wow look at you, so smart and special for speaking french on an English board

[Anonymous No.5211828]

>>5189850
>>5192467
>>5201601
>>5208504

[Anonymous No.5211937]

>>5210998
You're not even french stfu

[Anonymous No.5211957]

>>5211828
it looks like you put a lot more effort into white girls

[Anonymous No.5212182]

>>5211957
you think? He shaded the black girls and not the white ones.

[Anonymous No.5212482]

[Anonymous No.5212494]

>>5212482
no idea how faithful are the portraits, but it looks very cool. even in the thumbnail

[Anonymous No.5212502]

>>5212482
i really like this, good job anon!

[Anonymous No.5212764]

>>5208504
i'll struggle to get time in on this for a couple of days so i'll post now, see if i can finish before thread 404s
>>5199097
Beautiful!

[Anonymous No.5213360]

>>5212764
looks great so far

[Anonymous No.5213369]

[Anonymous No.5213470]

>>5189855
wide man

[Anonymous No.5214827]

bump to help the guy that promised to make every photo posted itt but spends like 3 days per portrait

[Anonymous No.5214860]

>>5205330
>He only thinks about getting paid when drawing
ngmi

[Anonymous No.5214900]

people need to stop with these fucking pretty pinterest reference photos, they're terrible for learning, they all look the exact same and have no expression
if you want good portrait reference take screenshots from a movie or youtube video where they're not trying way too hard to pose for the camera

[Anonymous No.5214902]

>>5205330
uuuuuh...

[Anonymous No.5214907]

>>5214900
the people who post this shit constantly are practically npcs who will always make bad art using pinterest as ref. every ref thread is stupid. i don't get what compels people to spam the same shitty threads with the same shitty images. all their work ends up looking exactly the same. artists don't need help collecting their own reference, in fact i don't want reference that other people collected. i think these threads are another variation on the "please validate my taste" theme like the "post artists that influenced you" threads.

[Anonymous No.5214920]

>>5214907
at least there are a few people making studies itt
but yeah, it should had been only 1 photo, rest is useless filler

[Anonymous No.5214925]

>>5201988
kek, thats how i do it.

[Anonymous No.5214927]

>>5214900
actually true, there's no way to learn expression with this kind of shitty Pinterest portraits.

[Anonymous No.5214936]

>>5214927
there's much more than expression in drawing compelling faces. studing faces you find attractive is the only way to getting better at that

[Anonymous No.5214939]

>>5189853
That is indeed a succulent neck.

[Anonymous No.5215325]

>>5214900
You could lead by example instead of sperging out

[Anonymous No.5215434]

>>5210910

Thanks for the ref

[Anonymous No.5215471]

>>5214907
This. Reference threads are inherently nonsense
Pretty sure retards that make them don't even draw

[Anonymous No.5215703]

>>5201601
A failed piece. Too many mistakes.

[Anonymous No.5215865]

>>5214936
these faces are all photoshopped, terribly lighted for artists and no, you do need to learn expressions or all of your faces will come out looking like the exact same shitty tumblr art bullshit, stop making excuses for wanting to stare at pretty women. if you want to draw attractive people then fine, but why don't you get good photo reference for it?

[Anonymous No.5215868]

>>5215325
>well lit
>actual expression
>face isn't polluted by obvious makeup and permed hair that doesn't reflect reality in the slightest
>interesting facial fetures that expand your visual library
>hayao miyazaki

[Anonymous No.5215895]

>>5189819
i enjoyed these refs but now they are harassing me

[Anonymous No.5215908]

>>5197125
t. amerigoblin

[Anonymous No.5216068]

Terrible references, a large amount are front view (boring/ flat), and many have boring/uninteresting lighting.

[Anonymous No.5216109]

>>5215868
I've posted several references that fit this criteria (I'm OP btw), but I wont argue that people generally gravitate towards 'pretty girl with default expression' images, which I'm trying to alleviate.
Be the change you want to see and help fellow artists by providing more images, or be like the other shitposters just flooding the thread with useless complaints

[Anonymous No.5216120]

>>5216109
fair enough

[Anonymous No.5216122]

[Anonymous No.5216123]

[Anonymous No.5216124]

[Anonymous No.5216125]

[Anonymous No.5216450]

>>5215865
> terribly lighted
that's how i know you don't even take photos, retard
>tumblr
>tumblr
>tumblr
you're obsessed

if they look appealing to ME then that's precisely what i will study

Also, I don't want your shitty pictures, i can find whatever i want pretty easy and this whole thread has ZERO value and is not even /ic/ related
>>>/p/
>>>/b/
>>>/trash/

[Anonymous No.5216532]

>>5216450
they're terribly lighted if you want to learn how to draw, they're fine as photographs but won't translate well into illustrative art. and no one's telling you to use my shitty pictures I'm telling you if you want to improve you need to stop using images that won't aid you in how lighting works

[Anonymous No.5216541]

>>5216532
so much bullshit. if (You) wanna improve better stop smelling your own farts

[Anonymous No.5216577]

>>5216541
but I just gave you a clear explanation how it would be helpful and you're getting pissed off because I told you your art reference isn't good. there's a reason professionals like proko don't use a fuck ton of different light sources and neon colours in their anatomy packs

[Anonymous No.5216583]

>>5216577
>a clear explanation
no you didn't. and you can't, cause you're talking out of your ass
sorry if i hurted your feelings, but your thread is trash

[Anonymous No.5216587]

>>5189896
gotta love dolly

[Anonymous No.5216610]

>>5216583
I did. a clear light source makes it so one plane is a certain shade, and if your light source is consistent then every plane that is that particular shade is clearly facing in that same direction. you can see this in most technically competent works by professional artists (pic related by david finch). if you have no clear light source you have no clear form, you just have a mess of shadows. this is a fundamental art rule. if you don't have a clear light source you have a flat looking mess

[Anonymous No.5216617]

>>5216610
>pic related
kek. just like your explanation
no idea who told you that bullshit about ONE (1) light source, but real life doesn't work like that

[Anonymous No.5216633]

>>5216617
shit forgot to link pic
>no idea who told you that bullshit about ONE (1) light source, but real life doesn't work like that
no. it doesn't. that's the entire point of drawing. that's like saying line art is stupid because real life doesn't have lines everywhere. how retarded are you?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V3WmrWUEIJo&ab_channel=Proko
why don't you watch this tutorial from a renowned teacher who knows way more than you and is way better at art?

[Anonymous No.5216649]

>>5216633
of course you need to use the simplest lighting to explain the most BASIC lighting principles. it doesn't mean that's the end of it, imbecile

[Anonymous No.5216671]

>>5216649
pyw show us you know basic lighting principles

[Anonymous No.5216680]

>>5216649
having a clear light source IS a basic lighting principle

[Anonymous No.5216705]

>>5216680
lolno, you got it all backwards

[Anonymous No.5216710]

>>5216705
show one professional art education source where it says that

[Anonymous No.5216726]

>>5216710
no u
the weight of evidence lies on the part making retarded claims

[Anonymous No.5216774]

>>5216726
I provided evidence of my claim>>5216633
you did not provide evidence of your claim>>5216705
you clearly have no evidence whereas I do

[Anonymous No.5216792]

>>5216774
again, you got your "evidence" all backwards cause you're either a retard, or intentionally misinterpretating a basic tutorial. stop being so boring, give me something to discuss at least

[Anonymous No.5216894]

>>5216792
taken from robert beverly hale's 'drawing lessons from the great masters

[Anonymous No.5216897]

>>5216894

[Anonymous No.5216908]

>>5216897
>it doesn't say anywhere that you MUST use only ONE light source
let me spell it for you: if a girl looks cute in a picture is only because the lighting is effectively enhancing her most appealing features

[Anonymous No.5216972]

>>5214900
>>5215865
>>5216532
>>5216577
>>5216610
>>5216633
You are correct, but you could have worded it better.
>>5216450
>>5216541
>>5216583
>>5216617
You are an idiot, and probably a beg.

Almost all pictures in this thread are from front view, bad or too soft lighting, no expressions, uninteresting features.
There is nothing to learn from here, stop thinking with your dick and start learning.

[Anonymous No.5216975]

>>5216894
>>5216897
Should have started with this.

[Anonymous No.5216981]

>>5216972
not that guy, but literally the opposite.

[Anonymous No.5216983]

>>5216981
>not that guy
Ok, we have 2 begs then.

[Anonymous No.5216988]

>>5216983
not that other guy, but you're a sad, resentful, sore loser, besides being a dunning kruger eternal beg

[Anonymous No.5216994]

>>5216988
>not that other guy, but you're a sad, resentful, sore loser, besides being a dunning kruger eternal be
No, I'm aware of my abilities and what I need to improve, thankfully I already passed my dunning Kruger phase 2 years ago.
But even if all of what you said was true, that wouldn't change the fact that the references in this thread are shit and won't teach you anything.

[Anonymous No.5217007]

>>5216994
>references in this thread are shit
agree. whole thread is shit, and all reference threads are inherently shit

[Anonymous No.5217876]

>>5211828
blog?????????

[Anonymous No.5218641]

>>5214900
>muh optimized study materials
i can't stand cunts like you, instead of contributing references yourself or godforbid actually drawing something you come in here trying to dissuade people from studying as if a one time sketch of some touched up pinterest model is going to have a profound negative effect on their ability to improve as an artist. fucking faggot. do you even draw, or do you just jerk off to your collection of complex references?? have you ever considered for one fucking second that not everyone has the same goals as you artistically? or that you have plenty of time to learn all the disciplines with the immense amount of work required to make it in this field? we got /beg/'s out here who can barely construct a face and here you are complaining about lighting and angles

[Anonymous No.5218695]

>>5218641
the lighting is literally to make it easier for you to draw it you presumptuous dipshit

[Anonymous No.5218705]

>>5218641
worst part is, it's not even a valid critique
any photo posted itt is as good/bad as the ones that preachy, dense /beg/ thinks everybody needs

[Anonymous No.5218718]

>>5218641
>>5218705
https://youtu.be/LrHfrncvODQ?t=183

[Anonymous No.5218733]

>>5218641
>instead of contributing references yourself
why do people have to spam images? this is the fucking ARTWORK AND CRITIQUE board. if you want to spam images in other places there are plenty of boards for that.

>>5218705
it is a valid critique because most of the lighting in this thread is flat as fuck with no discernible forms.

[Anonymous No.5218736]

>>5218705
This

[Anonymous No.5218809]

>>5189857
shit like this is the epitome of ngmi

[Anonymous No.5218851]

>>5218733
>why do people have to spam images?
Because that's the express purpose of this thread?

[Anonymous No.5218885]

[Anonymous No.5218892]

>>5218885
based ref

[Anonymous No.5218950]

>>5218851
this board isn't for "ref".

[Anonymous No.5219270]

[Anonymous No.5219322]

>>5218950
But this thread is
I haven't got a clue what you stand to gain from being a pedantic child, but I doubt you're going to stop any time soon so I'll stop engaging you from here on out.

[Anonymous No.5220316]

>>5218641
Beg
>>5218705
Beg

[Anonymous No.5221060]

[Anonymous No.5221093]

I love drawing good looking people as much as anyone else but there's just something off about drawing fashion models and instagram thots that makes the art weirdly dated and fake.
It's probably the makeup and hairstyles.

For example thick angular eyebrows on women has been a thing for the last few years and it instantly dates the art as during this period and associates it with social media models.

[Anonymous No.5221186]

>>5199097
nice

[Anonymous No.5221189]

>>5204987
no, not really

[Anonymous No.5221191]

>>5213470
I like it

[Anonymous No.5221416]

>>5211828
The White ones look great. Maybe you need a little more practice drawing the non-White ones?

[Anonymous No.5221561]

>>5199097
>>5203877
>>5212764
What programs are you guys using. What brushes? I've been trying Krita but I can't really get it to look good and smooth. Just using a standard brush and smudge tool obviously doesn't work. How do I do this digital shit

[Anonymous No.5221975]

>>5221561
Photoshop hard round brush everything

[Anonymous No.5222013]

[Anonymous No.5222015]

[Anonymous No.5222018]

[Anonymous No.5222029]

>>5212764
Very nice. How long did it take you to get this far in your portrait?

[Anonymous No.5222247]

>>5215868

[Anonymous No.5222538]

>>5191579
thank you for the refs, anon! Here's my best shot

[Anonymous No.5222577]

>>5213470
pure soul

[Anonymous No.5222613]

>>5212482
i like this

[Anonymous No.5222704]

>>5189857
I tried

[Anonymous No.5223116]

>>5222247
because of the black eyes he looks friendly yet mischievous at the same time. in the ref there are still some specks of whites

[Anonymous No.5223472]

[Anonymous No.5223692]

>>5223472
This makes me uncomfortable

[Anonymous No.5223706]

[Anonymous No.5223761]

>>5222704

[Anonymous No.5223767]

should i learn to draw the planes of the skull or the anatomy of the skull first?

[Anonymous No.5223770]

>>5222013

[Anonymous No.5223804]

>>5222704

[Anonymous No.5223815]

>>5223761
>>5223804
What the hell

[Anonymous No.5223821]

>>5223767
learn how to draw the basic forms and then slowly refine what you see to be more complicated and accurate

[Anonymous No.5223823]

>>5223821
i understand the basic forms

[Anonymous No.5223827]

>>5223823
Learn skulls first then muscles.

[Anonymous No.5223871]

>>5223767
I don't get what you mean by planes and anatomy, isn't learning anatomy just knowing what a skull looks like and being able to draw it? and aren't planes just sides of a basic form?

[Anonymous No.5223988]

>>5211071

[Anonymous No.5224019]

>>5223706

[Anonymous No.5224039]

[Anonymous No.5224060]

>>5201786
I think the biggest detrimental factor of this drawing is actually the tiny inaccuracies of the teeth. It's such a small thing that seem to matter a lot. Even in high end cg game characters this is what people often talk about. That the teeth don't look good/real.

[Anonymous No.5224086]

>>5198692
that would increase his chances of succeeding and being happy massively, so of course he doesnt, incel mindset has self sabotage as the core

[Anonymous No.5224181]

>>5223871
anatomy is learning the skull then all the face fat and muscles
planes is like being able to draw the asaro skull

[Anonymous No.5224973]

.

[Anonymous No.5225346]

post faces & ignore text

[Anonymous No.5225348]

[Anonymous No.5225353]

[Anonymous No.5225357]

[Anonymous No.5225360]

[Anonymous No.5225361]

[Anonymous No.5225363]

[Anonymous No.5225365]

[Anonymous No.5225367]

[Anonymous No.5225368]

[Anonymous No.5225369]

[Anonymous No.5225373]

[Anonymous No.5225374]

[Anonymous No.5225375]

[Anonymous No.5225381]

[Anonymous No.5225383]

[Anonymous No.5225389]

[Anonymous No.5225406]

[Anonymous No.5225592]

[Anonymous No.5225593]

[Anonymous No.5225595]

[Anonymous No.5225597]

[Anonymous No.5225600]

[Anonymous No.5225601]

[Anonymous No.5225602]

[Anonymous No.5225603]

[Anonymous No.5225605]

>>5189857
Fuckin ayy lmao

[Anonymous No.5225742]

>>5222704
simp ass zoomer identified....

some e-girl somewhere on the planet posted her narcissistic photo, and you being the easily manipulated simp that you were willingly used your artistic power to immortalize her.

this is why women do not respect men because men are desperate and easy to trick

[Anonymous No.5225767]

>>5225742
I'm a girl though, I just drew her because I liked her eyebrows and expression. Nice job projecting your insecurities on to me instead of critiquing my portrait, it was super helpful buddy

[Anonymous No.5225799]

>>5225767
post face, it isnt a projection. i dont draw vain looking women. I would prefer to draw a dignified or beautiful MILF.

[Anonymous No.5225804]

>>5225600
this guy is handsome but also pretty, what is it? what a unique face.

[Anonymous No.5225884]

>>5225799
Incel detected.

[Anonymous No.5225902]

>>5225884
im an incel because i think older women have more interesting personalities and faces? that they have real hobbies and lives? through college and my personal life I have had sex with over 20 people, im hardly an incel, many of them people i wish i didnt because they were self absorbed like most young women in the social media generation. art hos are a cancer.

Sorry that milfs or girls who dont live for social media are superior human beings. nu-goth is just corporate approved homogenous alternative(tm). They arent real people. And only zoomoids cant see through the veil.

[Anonymous No.5225910]

>>5225902
Thanks for the copypasta but you have to go back.

>>>/r9k/

[Anonymous No.5225924]

>>5225910
kek you really must be a zoomer simp with cognitive dissonance, or some girl as you (claim) who is butthurt because what i said hit close to home.

Nothing i said is hard to believe, if you have experience through dating a bunch of people in a certain demographic you are going to become intimately aware of their common shortcomings. its common sense.

[Anonymous No.5225928]

>>5225924
buddy
this is a portraiture thread
calm down

[Anonymous No.5225935]

>>5225928
post someone who isnt a manufactured egirl then or prepare to have people comment on the subject matter.

[Anonymous No.5225944]

>>5225935
>people
just you
just you being crazy

[Anonymous No.5225952]

>>5225944
post face simp or post someone who doesnt make pee pee go boing boing

[Anonymous No.5225956]

>>5225924
Nothing you said got to me, I just don't like milfsimps shitting up the portrait thread with unrelated babble.

Go on, shoo. Back to your little hobbit hole.

[Anonymous No.5225960]

>>5225956
im not a simp, zoomer. I was under the impression this was an art board. Not something for horny boys to immortalize their favorite e-thots on because they are pathetic.

[Anonymous No.5225967]

>>5225902
>WAAAAH PEOPLE ARE DRAWING THINGS I DONT LIKE WAAAHHHH THIS THREAD IS FULL OF WOMEN I DONT LIKE
Then post references you do like or draw things you like??? Nobody is forcing you to step into this thread, retard. You can leave at any time.

[Anonymous No.5225980]

>>5225967
sorry i just think its next level degeneracy for people to waste their artistic ability immortalizing their favorite only fans e girl when they can pick anyone or anything else to depict. All it does is boost their already legendary narcissism to even greater heights. the fact you lied about being a woman because of it makes it even worse. its not just simp or simp squared its simp to some power i cant even describe. they could power the hadron collider of that energy.

[Anonymous No.5225987]

>>5225980
this unironically boils down to 'i hate women and the attention they get'
seek help

[Anonymous No.5226018]

>>5225987
i dont hate women, women are great. I hate false idols and weak people who support and idolize shitty people. There is nothing wrong with women. Many of the smartest people and inventors have been women. The problem is that e girls are not women, ethots are not women. They are people who never mentally matured or grew up, because they didnt have to.

They get to sit in their room all day on twitter, dressing up as their favorite cartoon network character they built their personality around, getting more and more detached from real life each year that men send them money for feet pictures.

They never become the people they could have been and become weird fucked up distorted versions of themselves. Imagine thinking that eyebrows makeup black clothing, and copying the political opinions of people prettier than you is a personality.

[Anonymous No.5226042]

>>5226018
genuinely psychotic man
people are having fun and doing what they want with their time and its sending you into a tizzy
and youre airing all this out in a fucking portrait thread on 4chan dot com slash eye see

[Anonymous No.5226045]

>>5226018
you went off on a tangent because some anon drew some girl in portrait reference thread, reevaluate your life

[Anonymous No.5226051]

>>5226018
you are unhinged

[Anonymous No.5226071]

>>5226042
>>5226045
>>5226051
nice samefag, anon said i hate women because he thinks the only way you can be critical of any of them who live unhealthy lifestyles is if you hate all of them. its pathetic.

zoom zoom zoom maybe i will come back to this thread later and there will be an actual counter argument to this and not the desperate gaslighting of a zoomer coomer

[Anonymous No.5226134]

>>5226071
there isn't a 'counter argument'. you are steeped in a worldview that has little or no correlation with reality. you think that if a woman wears a style of makeup+clothes and take a picture of themselves they are evil and childish. you think you can extrapolate their entire character & lifestyle from how they wear their makeup. your "milfs" would be wearing exactly the same thing and taking selfies if they were 18 years old.

[Anonymous No.5226176]

>>5226018
They hated him because he told them the truth

[Anonymous No.5226186]

[Anonymous No.5226235]

>>5189857

[Anonymous No.5226406]

>>5226018
Kek, this is some next level incelposting.

[Anonymous No.5226544]

https://www.bodiesinmotion.photo/expressions?per_page=15&page=1&keywords=&isFree=true

[Anonymous No.5226584]

>>5226134
>little or no correlation with reality

you think i got these opinions regarding e-girls after dating or fucking just a few people? this is after probably 2 dozen people and noticing patterns through observation. the internet brings out the worst in peoples personalities and the more involved people are in social media shit the crappier they get. I have watched it happen 100 times.

Egirls are vapid shitty people. Women are great, you tried conflating the two earlier for some reason because you had some weak argument that someone who hates e girls hates women and it isnt the same thing.

E girls get their opinions and their style and music tastes from other e girls that they follow and idolize in a pyramid scheme ponzi network. In the past, subcultures at least grew organically through face to face interaction, and varied by town to town. but this has changed in the last decade with social media hitting a boiling point with how much it influences people. even a decade or two ago, there were discernible differences between alternative music cultures, today no longer.

>milfs

i brought up milfs for two reaons
1. this is an art thread, women in their late 20s and up have more interesting faces with more character in them, more personality. its up to interpretation which one you like more, but redrawing the same generic e girls with round soft pudgy faces has little to no artistic merit when they all look the same and copy eachothers look.

2. if you have to immortalize some stranger at least make it someone who is their own person, with their own personality, not a carbon copy e-girl who is the 10 or 20th generation copy from some earlier e-girl. it doesnt have to be a milf just fucking anything but an e-girl would be respectable.

>>5226406
nah what is incelposting, is people thinking only an incel can have these opinions. tells me that either
A. you are an incel with no experience in life
B. you are one of these E-girls and your ego is protecting itself

[Anonymous No.5226640]

>>5226584
where do you people come from

[Anonymous No.5226693]

>>5226640
handsome

also fuck you refute my argument or forfeit

[Anonymous No.5226756]

>>5226693
i forfeit i guess
+1 on your internet arguments won tally

[Anonymous No.5226759]

[Anonymous No.5226832]

>>5226756
its not the same.

[Anonymous No.5227396]

>>5191581

[Anonymous No.5228329]

need more threads like this

[Anonymous No.5228493]

>>5189834
i wrote this reply and now i kneel and stand corrected
can't believe you people actually went past the image limit