teal line guy

[Anonymous No.4780499]

post simon

[Anonymous No.4780501]

[Anonymous No.4780504]

>>4780501
This webm is definitely one of my favorites, really cool to see his workflow like that

[Anonymous No.4780509]

>>4780504
literally just fundies.

[Anonymous No.4780510]

[Anonymous No.4780511]

>>4780501
unironically just round brush bro

[Anonymous No.4780515]

>>4780511
especially 0:00-0:12

[Anonymous No.4780525]

living proof that fundies are all when comes to art.
also
>tfw Simon follows you on pixiv

[Anonymous No.4780532]

>>4780499
Are those supposed to be bad examples or good examples?

[Anonymous No.4780534]

[Anonymous No.4780539]

[Anonymous No.4780542]

>>4780532
*snips fedora*

[Anonymous No.4780545]

>>4780542
I honestly couldn't tell, since you're calling me a crab then I guess they're meant to be good examples

[Anonymous No.4780548]

>>4780539
Meant for fucking ants to read or something?

[Anonymous No.4780551]

[Anonymous No.4780553]

>>4780545
shoo shoo brainlet

[Anonymous No.4780559]

>>4780499

teal lines guy is not very good with anime or stuff drawn from imagination is he...

his re-draws for the cartoons look like a 14 year old westerner trying to draw anime. why did his anatomy suffer so much in the redraws when that timelapse video looks great? was he reffing a photo in that one?

like the limps look like sausages and noodles with none of the muscle or bone structure that's structurally supporting it.

[Anonymous No.4780561]

>>4780559
he was reffing a photo in the webm, it was from a study thread maybe two months ago. all the rest of these redlines/guides/tutorials/whatever are from around 2016 I think, so he's improved a lot since then

[Anonymous No.4780564]

https://twitter.com/simon_7617118/media Here is his current art.

[Anonymous No.4780575]

>>4780559
I'm pretty sure most of his work is actually construction-based imagination drawing.

[Anonymous No.4780577]

>>4780564
>when you’re worse than teal, but have a larger following
Based

[Anonymous No.4780582]

>>4780577
he tries to fly under the radar iirc, and i think he's purged his account a few times when people have found him. he does some lolishota shit iirc and got btfo about it before

[Anonymous No.4780583]

the ammout of crabbing is this thread makes me sick

[Anonymous No.4780589]

>>4780583
same dude, Simon is cool

[Anonymous No.4780590]

>>4780561
oh kek, no wonder.

>>4780564
that's definitely much better.

[Anonymous No.4780601]

why are these in low res

[Anonymous No.4780645]

[Anonymous No.4780658]

>>4780601
Here's a less dogshit one

[Anonymous No.4780659]

>>4780658
>THAT FACE IN THE RIGHT
YIKERONIS

[Anonymous No.4780662]

>>4780659
Na Simon is based
Keep crabbin tho I bet it's getting you really far anon

[Anonymous No.4780672]

>>4780659
pyw

[Anonymous No.4780684]

>>4780645
>Change gesture
>Draw the rest of fucking owl
>Still look shit and flat
What the fuck is wrong with this guy?
Why do he think he's qualified to correct/teach anybody?
Fucking dunning kruger fucks

[Anonymous No.4780742]

[Anonymous No.4780764]

>>4780501
This was done in just a single layer?

[Anonymous No.4780765]

[Anonymous No.4780774]

>>4780742
>>4780765
based Simon, these are awesome, and really good to watch to understand his construction and the fundamentals under what he does.
Does he work from reference or imagination mostly, for poses?

[Anonymous No.4780788]

[Anonymous No.4780798]

Whenever I see tealguys crits I'm always impressed at his ability to word such abstract qualities in art so definely. I could never explain what I find wrong with my shit like that in words. At best it's "not 3D enough" or "stiff". I guess that makes the difference in a good vs bad teacher.

[Anonymous No.4780804]

>>4780798
Teaching and drawing are different talents, anon, and you don't always need one to have the other. Lets see your work! I bet it's pretty decent.

[Anonymous No.4780814]

[Anonymous No.4780831]

[Anonymous No.4780832]

>>4780804
Sadly I checked my stuff for the past months and it's just embarrassingly rough stuff below the level of studies. Been in a rut lately trying to fix big issues in my figures. Maybe next tealguy thread I can post some more finished work for you

[Anonymous No.4780838]

>>4780764
It's not a single layer, but not many.
>>4777483

[Anonymous No.4780850]

>>4780832
Aw, you can show us, this is a comfy friend thread, anon

[Anonymous No.4780893]

>Gesture Envelope instead of "CSI"

The former felt so much better, cool to see other artists employ it.

[Anonymous No.4780897]

>>4780893
I agree completely, fuck CSI, teal line chan knows what's up. It's always felt way comfier to me to do the former.

[Anonymous No.4780914]

>>4780893
what is "gesture envelope"

[Anonymous No.4780920]

>>4780893
What

[Anonymous No.4780959]

Based Teal Line Guy, this guy’s got the fundies down. I’d love to hear from him how he studies to get to where he is now.

[Anonymous No.4780966]

>>4780914
>>4780920

Quick and dirty reference. Basically instead of flowing line an straight you describe the gesture with 2D Shapes. I find it's easier to see tilts and perspective on the figure with the envelope and to build construction on top of it

Mind you, I learned it both ways and both can work equally well, and learning the envelope actually helped me understand CSI more, but I feel like "CSI" is closer to Vilppu's approach to figure drawing (feel the form), which is intuitive and may not work for everyone, rather than say Hampton's approach with is more construction based.

[Anonymous No.4780973]

>>4780966
Honestly "envelope" from what i'm gathering seems more like step2 construction and like you've internalized the gesture, which is CSI step

[Anonymous No.4780976]

>>4780966
Now that I look at I fucked up the left most legs' gesture, but hope it's still helpful.

>>4780973
I'm not a teacher, and I most likely haven't conveyed everything as it was taught to me, all I can say is that starting with 2d shapes helped me understand gesture more than traditional gesture lines

[Anonymous No.4780987]

>>4780966
I'm not far into Vilppu but I'm sure he states you should understand the shapes and use the gesture as a guide on how they're twisting, moving, and interacting to each other

[Anonymous No.4780989]

>>4780987
Yeah this is kinda how I was understanding also
>>4780966
>>4780976
Ironically your "shitty CSI" doodle has the most life out of all of this

[Anonymous No.4780990]

>>4780499
Dunno this guy, but is this head supposed to be a good example or bad?

[Anonymous No.4780992]

>>4780990
(you)

[Anonymous No.4780997]

>>4780992
Have a (you). But is that head his “good” example?

[Anonymous No.4781000]

>>4780997
>>4780561
>>4780564

[Anonymous No.4781002]

>>4781000
Thanks for handholding me anon when I didn’t wanna TLDR this thread. Luv u

[Anonymous No.4781004]

>>4781002
love u too boo

[Anonymous No.4781037]

>>4780987
>>4780989
Vilppu deals with shapes too, he just didn't "connect" for me personally. Honestly not shitting on him, just it took perspective from somewhere else for him to really make sense to me.

>Ironically your "shitty CSI" doodle has the most life out of all of this

Thanks, I just find it a little cumbersome to add forms on top of it.

[Anonymous No.4781052]

>>4780966
...
so what i've been doing the entire time?
nice

[Anonymous No.4781141]

>>4780684
T. Beg

[Anonymous No.4781284]

>>4780684
T. Fucking moron

[Anonymous No.4781382]

He's based

[Anonymous No.4781406]

>>4781382
Ugh western anime