/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

[Anonymous No.4696117]

>Da Vinci and Michelangelo were being paid for their art
>I draw furry porn for money, so I'm just like them!

[Anonymous No.4696125]

>>4696117
Yes

[Anonymous No.4696127]

>>4696117
Could've just left it at porn

[Anonymous No.4696137]

Yes, and?

[Anonymous No.4696139]

>>4696117
A thread died for this. Imagine making a whole another thread for your seethe.
Why couldn't this just be continued this in the old thread? Did you want to erase the previous conversation to muddle up the context?
You were originally saying
>Believe it or not, the best artists draw as a hobby.
When you were told that the Sistine chapel was painted for money, you got mad.

[Anonymous No.4696144]

>>4696139
Yeah, and it would've looked even better if it was made for free.
My point still stands.

[Anonymous No.4696155]

>>4696144
>yeah the sistine chapel could've been better
Listen to yourself. You are doubling down. Weren't you supposed to respect the old masters?
Btw, nowhere in the original conversation was furry porn mentioned. You were simply saying that artists who draw as a hobby and spend their days working in an unrelated profession are better than artists who are trying to make a living off their art. That's a much broader category than just furry porn.

[Anonymous No.4696161]

>>4696155
>Weren't you supposed to respect the old masters?
I respect them, but even more so do I respect skilled people who don't sell their art, for their ideas aren't inhibited by the buyer's preferences.
>Btw, nowhere in the original conversation was furry porn mentioned.
That's why I made a separate thread, dumbass.

[Anonymous No.4696166]

>>4696155
>>4696139
he's just larping, you don't have to respond

[Anonymous No.4696171]

>>4696117
>i spend my days making coffee because i can't sell my art
>i'm holding on to my principles like real artists in the good old days
>i'm just like them
"Actually, the old masters made money with their work."
>t-the sistine chapel is overrated!!

[Anonymous No.4696176]

> commercial artists comparing themselves to the traditional masters

[Anonymous No.4696178]

>>4696171
That's right, good job quoting me.
Though I still believe that the most powerful and sincere statements are expressed through art when there is no money involved, and you are yet to provide a single counter-argument to that.

[Anonymous No.4696181]

Commercial digital art is like pop music, tasteless bland and reduced.

[Anonymous No.4696185]

>>4696181
Begone Cumfarti

[Anonymous No.4696187]

>>4696185
You know its true, keep seething faggot.

[Anonymous No.4696190]

>>4696187
Don’t worry, I will

[Anonymous No.4696200]

>>4696161
>thinking restrictions and inhibition aren't great for genuine creativity
Clueless hedonist.

[Anonymous No.4696206]

>>4696200
okay, gimpy
don't lose the key to your chastity cage

[Anonymous No.4696208]

>>4696206
>bitches about porn
>is a braindead coomer upset that he doesn't have a fraction of the "ideas" found within Michelangelo's commercial work

[Anonymous No.4696213]

>>4696117
>>4696144
Stupid fucking faggot, you are so insincere I'll rephrase your thoughts for you. You do not think that "true art is made for passion", you simply think art isn't worth any money. You put so much importance on money that you think artists are greedy if they want to make a living for their passion. You are in FACT legitimating the furry porn artists who draw shitting dick nipples for money. By negating the right of the artist to being paid, you are actually putting the mercenary on a pedestal.
You are a fucking massive brainlet.

[Anonymous No.4696220]

>>4696208
I'm not bitching about porn. I'm bitching about people who make porn and think too highly of themselves.
And not just porn. Pic related is what kills the modernist.

[Anonymous No.4696223]

>>4696220
Do you not understand that the banana on a tape and the furry porn are the direct result of people trivializing the importance of culture? Art isn't worth shit, it stopped being worth anything in the last century, so to sell art you have to sell non-art, you are not selling art, you are selling a drawn product, pornography. Or you are selling a political/consumerist badge, like the banana or the can of soup. You understand?

[Anonymous No.4696224]

>>4696213
I said what I said. If you've got reading comprehension of a blind retard that's your problem buddy.
I'd like to have a genuine discussion with you, but you seem to be busy arguing with somebody else that you've just made up.

[Anonymous No.4696226]

>>4696223
>sell too much art
>due to basic laws of economy art becomes worthless
>"Selling art isn't the problem!"
I truly do not understand you.

[Anonymous No.4696235]

>>4696226
>>4696224
How much of what you consider "art" have you given money to in the last money?

[Anonymous No.4696242]

>>4696235
*last month
It's not because people sell too much art that art has become worthless, it happened because people give it for granted and have no respect for the work that people put in it. 99% of the consumers don't give a fuck about "art" since we're in a society that trivializes anything but making money, we don't have any more values or ethics or beliefs, so our narratives reflect that with entropy, and culture is dying as a result.

[Anonymous No.4696250]

>>4696235
>Freudian slips into writing "money" again instead of "month"
Actually hilarious.
I don't spend money on art or "art products" because I can make my own if I need to.
>>4696242
>No, you don't understand, people should pay MORE for it!
Alright, Schlomo. I guess we should just crank up those prices for Harry Potter books, Star Wars movies and spotify albums, that ought to enlighten people.