[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/ic/ - Artwork/Critique


View post   

File: 104 KB, 1170x937, mpc-hc64_Lfb5Eg4hKD.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4652896 No.4652896 [Reply] [Original]

Show me your figure drawing

>> No.4653028

>>4652896
Imagine grabbing onto that bush that ripping it off like velcro.

>> No.4653636

>>4653028
then you look under the red robe and find a velcro-on dick

>> No.4653641

>>4653028
imagine using her bush as floss

>> No.4653703

>>4652896
You really couldn't find a more boring image to draw? Jfc.

>> No.4653707
File: 63 KB, 652x789, figure.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4653707

>>4652896
A-alright.

>> No.4653761
File: 294 KB, 843x1200, ic.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4653761

god i wish i could feel those forms

>> No.4653768

>>4653761
blog?

>> No.4653776

>>4653768
i post on @pokinha sometimes

>> No.4654146
File: 178 KB, 715x917, bushbush.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4654146

>>4652896

>> No.4654201

>>4652896
No

>> No.4654210
File: 331 KB, 1199x1790, 901DAD81-1397-4075-94D2-485EBF9FE412.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4654210

>> No.4654287

>>4654210
I see you are trying to channel Bridgman, that's cool. But pay more attention to her left arm. The bicep is facing upwards, that's the only way the arm can be bent without turning the elbow up.

>> No.4654295

>>4653761
cute face

>> No.4654301

>>4654146
blog?

>> No.4654304

>>4654301
blog?

>> No.4654307

>>4654304
blog?

>> No.4654348

>>4654307
Blog?

>> No.4654357

>>4654348
Blog?

>> No.4654363

>>4654357
Blog?

>> No.4654370
File: 203 KB, 788x1059, 2020-06-15_22-32.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4654370

>>4652896
im getting tlou2 vibes from mine, how do i suck less

>> No.4654381

>>4654370
For now try to copy the contour, forget construction for now. Also do gesture studies and try to eyeball proportions in them. Look for the rhythms in the lines of the body.

>> No.4654403
File: 972 KB, 1138x1556, m92fs.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4654403

>> No.4654408

>>4654363
Blog?

>> No.4654501
File: 63 KB, 461x665, icstudy2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4654501

>>4653707
cool hatching
>>4653761
great prop addition
>>4654146
very expressive
>>4654210
very bold, the ref is so stiff but you got some good subtle gesture in there
>>4654370
nice construction
>>4654403
sick gun

>> No.4654524

>>4654408
golb?

>> No.4654584

>>4654403
Put as much effort into her torso as you did the breasts. You compressed her torso almost by 50%.

>> No.4654608
File: 209 KB, 700x1100, 4652896.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4654608

>>4652896

>> No.4654617
File: 61 KB, 1116x838, Capturar.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4654617

>>4653761
I really wonder what is the secret to make any proportion sexually attractive

>> No.4654619
File: 52 KB, 973x751, Capturar2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4654619

>>4654617
btw same person
not only the proportion but the mindset I used to draw picture on the right is very different from the left, I just let my dick guide me but I'm not sure what is the technical difference
I think I couldn't make a thin girl attractive as this >>4653761

>> No.4654624
File: 198 KB, 449x512, 1575596227290.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4654624

>>4654608

>> No.4654692
File: 240 KB, 1470x955, Screenshot_20200616-003516308_1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4654692

I think I fucked it up

>> No.4654767
File: 52 KB, 1116x606, Capturar.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4654767

and I'm out

>> No.4654775

>>4654608
This looks amazing!

>> No.4654903

>>4653761
What in the fuck am I looking at? Did you even follow the ref? Her legs are deformed, you gave her a barrel chest and saggy runny egg tits, her left shoulder is, what the fuck am I looking at? why is there a film of skin wrapping her bicep like foreskin? what the fuck is wrong with her hips? why does she have 12% bodyfat, and then a random massive roll of fat ONLY on her right hip?
>b-but I was trying to show the f-form and p-pinching of h-her -
fuck up. Why doe she have mold growing on her vagina? why is she so stiff it looks like she was turned to stone.

I can't even imagine spending the time you must have spend getting to /int/ level and being too retarded to understand visual appeal.

>> No.4654908

>>4654767
you need to reevaluate your approach to legs, because yours are remarkably fucked up

>> No.4655228

>>4654908
Welp true
Any objective suggestion though?

>> No.4655239
File: 5 KB, 214x236, download.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4655239

>>4654692

>> No.4655296

>>4654903
Crab

>> No.4655324

>>4654608
how long did this take you anon?

>> No.4655331

>>4655324
32 seconds. I'm your god /beg/tard.

>> No.4655334

>>4655324
2 hours. It'd be 3 if I had to paint the gun and hand.

>> No.4655393
File: 76 KB, 495x691, women.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4655393

>> No.4655481

>>4654608
Props for fixing her ugly torso and disgusting bush

>> No.4655517

>>4655481
Ok pedo

>> No.4655571

>>4654608
Do you have a blog?

>> No.4655577

>>4654501
What game are you playing?

>> No.4655733
File: 103 KB, 680x777, 1574003710354.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4655733

I tried.

>> No.4655765

>>4654608
Is she entering the speed force?

>> No.4656153

>>4655296
If you're the author of the image you should actually consider the critique, because despite writing like the cringiest keyboard warrior, that anon has some serious points.

>> No.4656180

>>4656153
He's not me. I agree.

>> No.4656451

>>4653761
I can feel this form

>> No.4656480
File: 866 KB, 1620x2160, 51BFA4E9-95BB-4B75-850A-5488B66E4909.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4656480

>> No.4656590
File: 2.64 MB, 1907x2784, Muff Gun.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4656590

>> No.4656611

>>4653707
>>4653761
>>4654146
>>4654210
>>4654370
>>4654403
>>4654501
>>4654608
>>4654617
>>4654619
>>4654767
>>4655393
>>4655733
>>4656480
>>4656590
>>/beg/

>> No.4656613 [DELETED] 
File: 154 KB, 640x879, 937127A1-CCD9-4102-BAF0-603C8DE3D1AC.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4656613

>>4656611
Check this out Mr. Critic

>> No.4656619

>>4656613
Begone, Everbad!

>> No.4656621
File: 2.70 MB, 1907x2784, Muff Gun highlights.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4656621

>>4656590
added a little more highlights

>> No.4656677

>>4656613
Nice gun my dude it's upside down though remember to flip the image before posting.

>> No.4657190

>>4656611
Please pyw

>> No.4657384

>>4657380
being beg is suffering

>> No.4657433

>>4654767
study leg muscles, you seem to be heavily exaggerating the femur and it just looks mega fucked up

also you totally changed the ref's body type to thicc mc hugehips

>> No.4658476
File: 83 KB, 960x1280, D8DB13AC-F742-46A4-8817-B69603AE65F7.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4658476

>> No.4658678

>>4653761
Tits show no depth, other than that bretty gud

>> No.4658738
File: 50 KB, 640x480, IMG_1876 (1).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4658738

I'm a /beg/shitter.

>> No.4658742

>>4654767
Way cleaner lines than I can even hope for, but aformentioned legs and also both of your drawings are limpwristing the gun badly.
Berettas are definitely on the heavier end but the model is pointing hers much more confidently.

>> No.4658811
File: 2.66 MB, 904x1370, FigureIC01.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4658811

I barely know what the fuck I'm doing, I had to place the paper next to the image on my monitor and re-draw a good bit, especially for the arms.

>> No.4658891
File: 271 KB, 1344x2182, 8BB427E9-23BB-4D8D-A29B-62996575194D.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4658891

>>4652896

>> No.4658936
File: 133 KB, 800x1173, file.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4658936

>>4652896
Mistakes that you can smell

>> No.4658944

>>4654608
Really nice work on making the torso more appealing as an other anon already mentioned but i think the the head is a bit big, if you shrink it down a bit you re golden

>> No.4658986
File: 455 KB, 2000x2000, gestures.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4658986

>>4658936
are these good gestures if drawn under a minute?

>> No.4658993

>>4658986
Well, anything you can draw in a quick peace is good, but also have an idea of the poses you want to draw. (I'm not that great explaining things, sorry)

>> No.4658997

>>4656590
>>4656621
You should check if you're colorblind anon.

>> No.4659025

>>46537
/beg/tard
>>4653761
pretentious
>>4654146
retarded
>>4654210
needs more work
>>4654370
good attempt but poorly executed
>>4654403
NGMI
>>4654501
interesting style but still /beg/
>>4654608
overrated
>>4654617
lazy and /beg/
>>4654692
disgusting
>>4654767
terrible
>>4655393
retarded
>>4655733
/beg/
>>4656480
/beg/
>>4656590
/beg/
>>4658476
good attempt but quite /beg/
>>4658738
can't even rotate the picture
>>4658811
/beg/
>>4658891
interesting but poorly executed
>>4658936
revolting

>> No.4659137

>>4659025
Pyw bitch

>> No.4659256

>>4654501
do you have a blog?

>> No.4659343

>>4659025
*clack* clack*

>> No.4659353

>>4653761
Dude, you are effing terrific. What the heck are you doing on this site? Shouldn't you be working as a full-time artist? Everything here is stunning. Can you provide me some tips on how you learnt to draw like this? I can't even draw a circle in perspective, that's how bad I am.

>> No.4659357

>>4654501
Your style is really interesting. Cubist-esque.

>> No.4659653

@4659025
pyw faggot

>> No.4659732
File: 119 KB, 583x896, 1571516455662.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4659732

i got sidetracked, but this is what i did in about ~20 mins

>> No.4659737

>>4659353
pyw fag

>> No.4659740

i swear the model in OP needs to do loomis cuz man that (my) right arm to neck is super weird

>> No.4659749

>>4659732
this is better than 99% of the shit in this thread
>>4659353
fuck off idiot

>> No.4659760

>>4659749
Why?

>> No.4659765

>>4659749
i made that pic and i think that's a bit overblown, but thank you for the comment

>> No.4659865
File: 2.59 MB, 3000x4000, IMG20200618075827.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4659865

>> No.4659902
File: 3.01 MB, 3000x4000, IMG20200618082201.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4659902

>> No.4660025
File: 1.56 MB, 1920x2560, IMG_20200420_100417.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4660025

>>4652896
Ok

>> No.4660028

>>4660025
i hate the internet

>> No.4660047
File: 1.53 MB, 1920x2560, IMG_20200420_100408.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4660047

>>4660028
So sorry contestant, the word we were looking for was, "love". Better luck next time!

>> No.4660314
File: 2.81 MB, 3120x4160, 15924826876801474738547.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4660314

>>4659353
It's extremely bad. I never learnt the fundamentals during my teen years, and eventually gave up drawing altogether. I'm 25 now and am picking it up after 4 years or so, and am trying to learn theoretical principles properly this time instead of merely drawing anime faces like I always did. This was a page I scribbled yesterday. There's about one cube, on the middle right, which I feel came out okay. The rest is rubbish.

>>4659749
No need to be rude. I'm just trying to improve like everyone else.

>> No.4660316

>>4660314
Sorry, was meant for >>4659737

>> No.4660357

>>4660314
Still doesn't explain why you were so impressed by that drawing. It's quite amateurish with a lot of issues.

>> No.4660395

>>4660357
Can you explain them? I will try and learn from your critique.

I can see that he has been faithful to the reference as much as he could, adding features in various places that were not in the original. The anatomy is a bit too bendy in some areas. But as a whole, I consider his anatomy, line quality and other dimensions to be great.

>> No.4660408

>>4660395
hasn't been faithful

>> No.4660416

>>4660408
NTA but go ahead and explain what's wrong with that pic other than you just being jealous

>> No.4660422
File: 233 KB, 878x1191, jesus those legs.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4660422

really /beg/ tier but it was a worth a shot

>> No.4660428

>>4660416
I think you meant this for >>4660357

I am the compliment giver >>4660357

>> No.4660446

>>4660395
>>4660416
The main issue is her left shoulder, which should be higher, and it's drawn too close to the chest. The torso is rotated towards her left side compared to the reference which makes the pose look unnatural. And as you said it's too bendy in some places, like her right forearm looks like it's made of rubber. Looks unappealing to me.

>> No.4660465

>>4660446
He still has a great grasp of all the fundamentals, and is likely at the level to do this professionally. An image like that, on a board like this, deserves more credit than you've given him in my opinion.

>> No.4660525

>>4660465
>He still has a great grasp of all the fundamentals
First of all, you can't judge "all the fundamentals" from that drawing. Secondly, I wouldn't call that great.

>and is likely at the level to do this professionally
If by doing it professionally you mean drawing porn commissions, sure. If you mean like concept art or illustrations, probably not.


>An image like that, on a board like this, deserves more credit
I don't know, I've been absent from /ic/ for some time, maybe the overall level dropped so much? This thread is really bad, I don't know why.

>> No.4660581

>>4660525
Would you mind posting a comparable anatomy study which you consider to be of value? One that is a similar but improved version of what the other anon was going for. I'd like to see it so that I can understand what better art looks like.

>> No.4660951

>>4660581
You want me to draw a study in the same style or what?

>> No.4660997

>>4660951
Not necessarily, just share a picture of a similar anatomy study (meaning something that is going for the same simplicity and minimalism as that picture, rather than a super-rendered and extremely expressive life drawing that isn't what the guy there was aiming to do) so we can contrast the former to it and better understand what art can aspire to.

>> No.4661201
File: 76 KB, 1000x667, fig2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4661201

>>4654608
I wish I could draw like you

>> No.4661241

>>4660997
Well then I'd recommend watching Glenn Vilppu.

>> No.4661247

>>4658997
:O

>> No.4661651

>>4652896
I'd rather draw the chair

>> No.4661868

>>4661201
awwww poor little /beg/tard

>> No.4661963
File: 665 KB, 1000x640, __yasuhara_ema_shirobako_drawn_by_coco3186__3300bdb846232daf81c0346af2594b84.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4661963

>>4653761
this is goals desu.... now i'm pumped to work hard.

>> No.4661971

>>4661963
and this one >>4654608 too
if only i could combine these two

>> No.4661987
File: 122 KB, 960x1280, IMG_20200618_200812.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4661987

oh this thread is still alive, cool. I'll post critiques in a second

>> No.4662014

>>4661987
mine
>>4653707
arms are a bit long but overall pretty good
>>4653761
bit above the left tit looks weird, body looks pretty realistic but not very sexy, which is what I think your going for
>>4654146
orangutan arm, but fine. I really like the way the face looks on this one
>>4654210
angles are a bit weird. head looks like it's from an upwards perspective, body looks like you're looking at it from a lower perspective. Took me a while to notice though, so take that for what you will
>>4654370
Not great, would study more
>>4654403
favorite in the thread so far aside from my own
>>4654617
looks sloppily done. This gives me the impression that you can draw way better than that.
>>4654692
you did. keep trying though
>>4656590
jesus christ those fucking feet. that face. Fucking hideous. neat use of color though
>>4658476
waist down looks like a completely different picture. Study perspective
>>4658738
not even the worst one in the thread, dont be so hard on yourself
>>4658891
pretty decent but you fucked the legs up
>>4660422
skelly looks okay, though. If you still have the rough composition and nothing else I'd restart from there.
>>4661201
angle from waist up is different from the waist down angle. Aside from that, it's fine

>> No.4662162
File: 870 KB, 1893x2589, figure22.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4662162

>>4652896
alright

>> No.4662166

>>4662162
The actual figure isn't communicated particularly well with those thick ass textured lines but the face is well done so that's something

>> No.4662172

>>4662014
>pyw
Oh damn...

>> No.4662198
File: 43 KB, 755x1000, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4662198

it turned very off and creepy still posting it

>> No.4662199
File: 2.81 MB, 640x700, 4654608.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4662199

>>4661201
All the important stuff is in the first 10 seconds.

>> No.4662259

>>4662199

Thanks for sharing that process anon! You have such a nice deliberate workflow and the result is great.

I gotta say though- your early shadow block-in was so beautifully economical with the way it navigated hard and soft edges, it definitely made me wanna see more. Will you share your art site or insta with us?

>> No.4662262
File: 123 KB, 676x890, yes.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4662262

>>4652896

>> No.4662321

>>4662199
I just keep replaying this, over and over again. It's mesmerizing.

>> No.4662331
File: 79 KB, 679x925, 06-16-20.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4662331

>>4652896
This woman has a weird masculine body so I went and fixed an obvious error.

>> No.4662356

>>4662262
Best one so far.

>> No.4662382

>>4662331
>weird masculine body

ay lmao

>> No.4662839

>>4661971
Why would you want to combine them?

>> No.4662843

>>4662166
>The actual figure isn't communicated particularly well
It is though.

>> No.4662862

>>4659025
>every single one is bad
>except the one that's good but it's "pretentious"

what a miserable ngmi fuck.

>> No.4662879

>>4662014
Most of your critiques are on point, even though you're a complete /beg/ even by this thread standards. Fascinating.

>> No.4662952

>>4662162
Fuuuuuuuuuuuuck that's way too good. You win this thread. Blog?

>> No.4663029

>>4662331
You need to be over 18 to be on this thread kiddo.

>> No.4663131

>>4652896
>mommy when I turn up instead of Chadson

>> No.4663149
File: 110 KB, 591x976, Annotation 2020-06-19 163210.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4663149

No idea what the fuck i'm doing, first figure drawing. Anyone have any good videos or resources to start with?

>> No.4663161

>>4662843
The proportions are mostly accurate but the form is lost in many spots and the midsection is particularly poorly communicated and I think it's something in that area that makes her whole center of balance look off. I will say the shoulder attached to the arm with the gun and the calves going down into the feet look good.

>> No.4663173

>>4662843
>>4662952
samefagger go

>> No.4663204

>>4659025
>>good attempt but quite /beg/
I don't know what that means. Maybe suggest some way I could improve it?

>>4662014
>>waist down looks like a completely different picture. Study perspective
I know perspective, and I practice it regularly. The "waist down" looking like a different picture is exaggerated. You're posturing. But thanks anyway, I guess.

>> No.4663207

>>4663161
I don't really see what you're talking about, I think the shadow and light shapes are more or less accurate, and the center of balance doesn't look off to me, and the thumbnail looks fine. Maybe the values are a bit off at places, but not too much.

>>4663173
Idiot.

>> No.4663255

>>4662199
Jesus what the fuck was that at the end with one overlayed color for the full body
How did you made it, no tutorial on youtube has it as economically done as yours

>> No.4663454

>>4662862
shut up idiot

>> No.4663509

>>4662879
when I look at every post with the word "/beg/' all the matches are from people who didn't do one iota of critiquing yet think they are. Fascinating
>>4663204
>complains that he isn't recieving critique
>gives the guy giving him advice shit

>> No.4663523

>>4663509
>when I look at every post with the word "/beg/' all the matches are from people who didn't do one iota of critiquing yet think they are
I don't quite understand what you mean. Personally, I did give some critique in this thread. The word /beg/ just means beginner.

>> No.4663537

>>4663523
Hate to break it to you man, but just writing "/beg/" doesn't make you a drawing advice guru.

>> No.4663541

>>4663149
id say go with either hampton or vilppu. or try both.

>> No.4663560

>>4663537
Guess what, I know that, retard. I just noticed that it's interesting that your drawing is shit but your critique is good. I wasn't giving you critique or advice on your drawing.

>> No.4663569

>>4663560
>uhhh, yeah I knew that! I know how to critique I'm just not doing it cuz uh... hmmm. oh! cause you're retarded of course! what do you mean "post my work" I don't have time to do that! I just write critiques!

>> No.4663591

>>4663569
You didn't ask me to post my work. Or to critique yours. Why are you even so aggressive? If you wanted critique you could've just fucking said so.

>> No.4663817

>>4652896
This photo looks so strange. It looks like it could be an uncanny 3d model. Probably a combination of:
Her wierdly proportioned body - very broad manly shoulders
Her awkward pose
Her thousand yard stare
The strangely inconsistent lighting - looks like might have increased the contrast or it's a bad camera

>> No.4663835

>>4663817
That's what I said with this, >>4662331 which was just a light hearted joke, she has weird anatomy that looks masculine, particularly the upper arms and shoulders, broad waist, tall and narrow hips and a very visible Adonis line, seems people don't have much of a sense of humor on /ic/ these days.
Also the face is looks semi retarded, there's this screen cap about a guy wanting to make a retarded girl his gf and the girl in question had a very similar looking face to the model in the OP.
I honestly wouldn't be surprised if that woman has some kind of genetic issue.

>> No.4663857

>>4663817
>>4663835
Try to go outside and interact with real humans sometimes, you autismos. Yeah her build is a bit masuline, guess what people come in different shapes. Her face looks normal.

>The strangely inconsistent lighting - looks like might have increased the contrast or it's a bad camera
What exactly is inconsistent?

>> No.4664018

>>4663857
>What exactly is inconsistent?
Not entirely sure why it looks so strange to me, but here's my guess:
The area around the gun makes it look like the scene is being lit by a very bright light source - there's a lot of contrast in the thumb region and the sheet in the background looks radiant. But the rest of the picture looks like it's not being lit with nearly the same amount of intensity.
I think it might be partially because she's pointing her arm in the direction of the light source, but I suspect that someone may have messed with the contrast of the image as well.

>> No.4664060

>>4663857
Once again, people have no sense of humor.

>> No.4664068
File: 49 KB, 842x822, 1573773889442.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4664068

You've got to FEEL the form.

>> No.4664481

>>4664068
teach me how to FEEL

>> No.4664482

>>4663255
>one overlayed color for the full body
You lose control of the colors when using multiple overlay layers.
In Sai and CSP, an entire folder can be set to an effect. All the layers within the folder will interact with each other normally, so you can make very controlled adjustments. I'm not up to date on PS, so I don't know if it has this feature.

>> No.4664513

>>4662199
This is actually really helpful, thanks.

>> No.4664523

>>4662199
Is this Mike?

>> No.4665475

>>4662199
Fucken saved my dude. Thanks for sharing your process.

>> No.4665902
File: 71 KB, 632x1080, srynsr.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4665902

>>4663509
>gives the guy giving him advice shit
What's wrong with critiquing a bad attempt at a critique?

>> No.4666032

>>4665902
he's whining

>> No.4666040

>>4662199
Hey thanks for this, i'm trying to follow this video, but in a more celshaded style, but when i add the light it kinda looks like shit, any idea?

>> No.4666150

>>4666040
It's impossible to say unless you post an example. The term cel-shaded itself is so often misused and overbroad that it does not narrow things down.

>> No.4666175

Why do you idiots keep responding to mass repliers? They are not sincere and are only attention and drama whores.
Don't respond and they'll stop shitting up the board.

>> No.4666244
File: 1.12 MB, 3300x2550, d6.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4666244

>> No.4666245

>>4666150
You're right, i mean hard edge shadows, not rendering basically. I didn't make this particular study, but when i came home i'll give it a try just to make an example.

>> No.4666792
File: 108 KB, 847x998, Study4ch.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4666792

>>4666150
Ok here, i've done it super quickly, i'm probably doing something terrible wrong cuz light looks fucking weird to me, despite my best effort,

>> No.4667014
File: 238 KB, 700x998, 4666792.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4667014

>>4666792
If you want to make it look like old anime, you shouldn't have that reflected light layer. The lightest lights and the darkest darks should be reserved for accents, and used sparingly.

>> No.4667142
File: 285 KB, 641x884, ic ref lady challenge.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4667142

trying a more cartoony style, never really done that before

>> No.4667190

>>4667142
cartoony != pedobait

>> No.4667209

>>4667190
glad you liked it

>> No.4667236

>>4667209
I did not, it looks bad. Her body is bent awkwardly, her right arm is an unrecognizeable mess, her face looks like a chucky doll, and your sketch looks like scribbles of a deranged lunatic whose mind just goes blank as soon as he sets out to draw something, and his hand just moves uncontrollably around the general direction of the drawing instead of making confident stroke.

>> No.4667268

>>4667236
I'll try to do better in the future

>> No.4667434

>>4666792
This is a good critique >>4667014
That bounce light you're doing does not work with cel shading.

Be more subtle witht the lights and make the joints thinner. You gave her cankles fat writsts and knees.

Also tit's are a wierd shape, more tier drop

>> No.4667540
File: 133 KB, 1264x2048, E866D799-AD48-4BFD-BC96-41FC5DFD2E56.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4667540

>> No.4667649

>>4652896
whys her pussy so hairy?

>> No.4667707

>>4667649
All pussies are hairy when you don’t shave them.

>> No.4667946

>>4667707
Not quite true :^)

>> No.4667989

>>4666792
Imho youve got simply too much visual noise going on with intricate shapes busying both light and shadow parts.
You want detail in one side and areas of rest in the other, so detailed light areas with highlights and stuff = simplify shadow areas for balance and clear intention instead of detailing everything as much as possible.

>> No.4667994

>>4666792
>>4667989
Also, the underbelly area, the shadow, looks very strange and attracts attention for wrong reasons, simplifying that into a more elegant shape would certainly help.

Nice work otherwise btw, I really like the face and stylization of proportions.

>> No.4668034

>>4667946
have sex

>> No.4668046

>>4659025
>He doesn't even like the best one
faggot

>> No.4670751
File: 394 KB, 889x1200, figr.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4670751

>> No.4670857
File: 18 KB, 200x199, 1591919344729.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4670857

>>4670751
>>4666792
>>4665902
There are some insanely talented people on this board. Holy shit

>> No.4670887
File: 143 KB, 1170x937, figure sketch 3.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4670887

>>4652896

>> No.4670973
File: 58 KB, 600x817, D9E6F6D8-F62B-4875-A55A-61577CF39291.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4670973

blast me with the critique boys

>> No.4670992

>>4670973
Head is a bit small anon, but the rest y pretty good actually.

>> No.4671088
File: 113 KB, 841x1000, fgr.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4671088

Pretty much did my own thing on this one fellas.

>> No.4671471

>>4662199
How do you get your brush to be so smooth with the shading? I'm using shit default brushes for an ancient version of PS Elements and I always end up with that streaky look.

>> No.4671569

>>4653761
I don't think this is that great. Are you samefagging or what?

>> No.4671598

>>4662199
Can we get this in real-time pretty pretty please? Or as close to real-time as possible? Even if it's just the first 10 seconds of that vid but in real time.

>> No.4671824

>>4670973
Your shadow work is really good, or at the very least I like it. The inner side of both elbows looks kinda weird, and the head is a bit small like the other anon said. Otherwise proportions are looking good, the core/abs/legs look great. Keep it up, senpai.

>> No.4672526

>>4662199
Thanks for this

>> No.4672577
File: 389 KB, 1250x1860, sketch.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4672577

>> No.4672829

>>4654608
>>4665902
>>4672577
Why do the best painters skimp on the hands?

>> No.4672976

>>4672829
Unless it's a big focus of the composition, it's in the best interest for painters to do as little work as possible with hands.Painting as a whole works because they imply shape and color, and your mind kinda fills in the rest. However, the more effort and brushwork you add to an area, the more it draws your eyes to it. And since the hands are so small and unimportant to the overall form, they just do the general idea and our brain does the rest of the work. It's like how sketches almost always look better than the final linework. ((That or I'm hyper/beg/))

>> No.4673024

>>4672829
I don't have the time typically

>> No.4673026

>>4672976
This

>> No.4673045

>>4672577
The combination of bright reflected light, blending in all directions, and wide value range makes the rendering seem metallic. Reduce the amount of contrast and blending, and reserve the darkest values for occlusion.

>> No.4673078
File: 1.23 MB, 860x964, sketch.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4673078

>>4652896

>> No.4673195
File: 1.35 MB, 1378x2039, Fig practice.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4673195

>> No.4673200

>>4672829
Because you have to use a smaller brush to do them. It's like a whole other technique just to paint hands.

>> No.4673595

>>4662199
>Epic Hero that brought Serious Business to /ic/
God bless you for bringing light into this dark crab pit
I fukken saved

>> No.4673600

>>4664068
FEELure_2_FEEL.jpg