[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

View post   
File: 363 KB, 900x1199, going_to_church__001.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4512536 No.4512536 [Reply] [Original]

How do I draw like this

>> No.4512542

>>4512536
LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOMIS

>> No.4512580

>>4512536
Hampton

>> No.4512582

>>4512536
fucking kid looks like he's hiding something
a closeted faggot, or a psycho, or some really dark shit

>> No.4512585

Study Bridgman, that's what Loomis did afterall.

>> No.4512615

>>4512536
hack

>> No.4512616
File: 110 KB, 532x431, loomis_small_two-young-women-lounging-on-porch-swing.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4512616

>>4512536

>> No.4512626
File: 225 KB, 1000x1311, watchtower_harlot.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4512626

>>4512536
Learn fundies really well and go to the nearest Kingdom Hall (Jehovah's Witness church) and paint people. Maybe you'll get a job as a cover artist while you're at it.

>> No.4512629

>>4512582
nice projection

>> No.4512633

>>4512536
>>4512580
>>4512615
>>4512616
>>4512626
Do I have to learn to paint to be able to color like this?

>> No.4512641

>>4512582
Because rest of the family is super-model tier. Humans are hardwired to irrationaly suspect ugly people must be evil.

>> No.4512729

>>4512626
Their watchtowers always had great references.

>> No.4512773

>>4512633
Probably bait, but you should realize that "coloring" IS painting

>> No.4512777

>>4512773
What is the medium of the image

>> No.4512797

>>4512773
No, like if I want to emulate that effect in flat-colored line-art, do I need to learn to paint from life? Or is there a color theory text out there that I can consult?

>> No.4512880
File: 618 KB, 800x619, f7b.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4512880

>>4512536
I think you know

>> No.4512890

>>4512536
Maybe not loomis

>> No.4512962

>>4512797
Still painting.

>> No.4513169
File: 92 KB, 640x450, large.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4513169

>>4512536
How can I digitally colour like this bros

>> No.4513173

>>4512536
two different things, you need to be able to see proportions and line correctly, and you need to be able to see and recreate correct values, check out the bargue plates and practice copying those

>> No.4513342

>>4512536
All loomis was good for was monopoly man lookin garbage and sunday school ass paintings

>> No.4513344

>>4512542
>le floating Loomis heads
>Can only draw with reference
Post your work crablord

>> No.4513348

>>4513342
If you master the techniques from him you’ll will only be ablegt to draw with references

>> No.4513354

>>4513348
As the gods intended.

>> No.4513414

>>4512536
Loomis

>> No.4514256

>>4512536
I know some people here idolize him, but i personally find his stuff boring af
it seems like he relied too heavily on reference, which is good up to some point since it allows his subjects to look more natural, but at the same killed his creativity and made everything look stiff and unimaginative

>> No.4514261

>>4512582
Dad looks like he's a serial killer

>> No.4514280

>>4512582
>>4514261

i don't see it
you guys are mentally ill

>> No.4514303

why would you want to .just bee yourself. no one is interested in a loomis copycat in 2020AD anyhoo

>> No.4514327

>>4514280
white people are creepy

>> No.4514337
File: 142 KB, 970x632, Creative_Illustration_Tom_Page_3.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4514337

>>4514256
Not all of his stuff is unimaginative, some of his work in Creative Illustration is imaginative.

Still, the point is not to idolize him. A lot of these classic teachers—Bridgman, Loomis, Jack Hamm—weren't innovative or stellar artists (hell, Jack Hamm drew lame Christian fundamentalist cartoons), but they all had a solid grasp of fundamentals and a knack for articulating them, which makes their books helpful.

>> No.4515541

>>4514256
Same here, or at least the example in the OP. Looking at shit like that only makes me think how I DON'T want to draw like that at all.

Honestly, this one thing still fucks with me a lot: the fact you can master autistic, godlike levels of fundamentals and all the while have no way of knowing if your art is going to be actually GOOD or not. You know what I mean? Between skill level and personal tastes, there's just so much that could ruin your work in a lot of different ways.

>> No.4517586
File: 118 KB, 464x401, 7687676.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4517586

>>4512582
>>4514261

>> No.4517591

>>4514261
Because liberal media has brainwashed you into thinking all white men are evil.

>> No.4517603

>>4512626
Hitler vibin' in the background

>> No.4518377

>>4512536
1. Its a style study it.
2. Loomis studied at the arts students league with George Bridgman and Frank Dumond. You should check out their students and their teachers. Both Bridgman and DuMond studies in paris at the academie julian, under the likes of Jean leon Gerome, Jules Lebfarve ect., check out classical training(modern close connection in training can be found in students of ted seth Jacobs). Also the students of Bridgman and DuMond such as Frank Reilly, Burne Hogarth, Normal Rockwell. There are also related resources such as the famous art school stuff.
In general its a stylized art that uses references and has a heavy background in traditional observational drawing.