/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

[Anonymous No.4273951]

Guys, i think talent is real

[Anonymous No.4273957]

I started in 2015 too and I haven't made half that progress. wtf

[Anonymous No.4273958]

>>4273951
Of course it is. There are many /beg/ retards that barely improved in that time span.

[Anonymous No.4273959]

>>4273951
soulless

[Anonymous No.4273960]

>>4273958
Based, this is the reason as to why most retarded /beg/ don’t improve no matter what.

[Anonymous No.4273962]

>>4273958
They make too many talent threads instead of practicing. This is why retarded /beg/ is a thing now, kek.

[Anonymous No.4273963]

>>4273951
Obviously

[Anonymous No.4273964]

>>4273951
naah that's 100% possible, because the person was young, younger brains are more flexible in the reception of information and have more affinity with learning long process things more fast, the point is that if you manage to push a teenager to do only one thing and focus her abilities in that, you can have a exponential progress, is mostly because their brains are more open minded to new inputs, old people can still do that but in general their ways of do things are conditioned so they have more difficulties.
That's why you see for example those young kids in the olympic games, or some kids that know how to plays instruments really good, is just that they focus on the shit

[Anonymous No.4273968]

>>4273964
also is a ego thing, adult people allways have this inner ego problems when they try to enter in a new medium, but kids have can have less, more than ego is self-criticism, kids can be teach to manage the self-criticism better than an average adult in general, if you do it right of course, if not you have those guys who have all the flaws and draw like shit for all their lives.

[Anonymous No.4273973]

>>4273951
The only realities are esoterica that dictate the shaper of the mind.

[Anonymous No.4273975]

I’m the exact same age as her, I wish I started drawing at that time.

[Anonymous No.4273989]

>>4273951
This is completely reasonable amount of progress for anyone that actually learns their fundies and makes focused practice everyday instead of mindless doodling. Call it talent if you want, but this person worked hard. Begs that just want to blame “talent” for their shortcomings instead of taking responsibility and doing the work are true ngmis.

[Anonymous No.4273998]

>>4273989
>This is completely reasonable amount of progress for anyone that actually learns their fundies and makes focused practice everyday instead of mindless doodling.
pyw, how long you've been drawing and if you're a woman (transgenders do not apply) also post feet.

[Anonymous No.4274008]

>>4273951
if you think this is talent you have never seen talent. Left looks like shit because she has no talent, actual talented artists make better looking art at 8 than what you'll ever be able to do in your entire life.

[Anonymous No.4274013]

>>4273998
Seething crab couldn’t get out of /beg/

[Anonymous No.4274021]

>>4274013
>doesn't post work when confronted
Heh

[Anonymous No.4274022]

everyone above this post got baited

[Anonymous No.4274025]

>>4273998
Not everyone is a retarded /beg/ like you, anon.

[Anonymous No.4274035]

stop spamming your shit on /v/

[Anonymous No.4274036]

>>4273951
why do artists always put their age in their progress shit don't they realize how cringey they'll feel in 4 years

[Anonymous No.4274069]

>>4273989
/thread

[Anonymous No.4274171]

>>4274036
To mock oldfags and make them seethe of course.

[Anonymous No.4274173]

>>4274036
To make you seethe

[Anonymous No.4274188]

>>4273989
/ic/ btfo

[Anonymous No.4274620]

>>4273951
>talent is real
In the other news sky is blue
>that guy with 2000 drawn pictures who is still worse than someone who drew 100 pictures in the same time

[Anonymous No.4274629]

>>4274620
>that guy with 2000 drawn pictures who is still worse than someone who drew 100 pictures in the same time

not really about talent thats just someone who isnt practicing deliberately or has a learning disability.

[Anonymous No.4274642]

>>4273951
4 years almost 5 it's a lot! What are you fuckin retards talking about! If you focus on your fundies it's possible! Besides, she only draws faces so there's that

[Anonymous No.4274665]

>>4273951
yikes the hair is pretty much the only thing that was painted and not a copypaste photo study, and the skill of the hair speaks for itself

[Anonymous No.4274669]

>>4273951
Easily possible to do a portrait like this if all you do is drawing people from ref and never from imagination. I'd need to see more of his work to say whether most /beg/s couldn't do it. Nothing I produced looks this good but I didn't spend all my points on rendering.

[Anonymous No.4274676]

>>4273951
1. 4 years is a lot
2. You all need to understand that copying reference 1:1 doesn't mean shit. This person could be copying pinterest photos all the time while their concept art/illustration/whatever folio is empty and sad. This painting is pretty, sure, but what is the potential for commission here? For all we know this person is capable only of doing 1:1 portraits and we can't say otherwise until we see the rest of their work. Just use your common sense

[Anonymous No.4274677]

>>4273951
>only paints portraits
>for 4 years

If you don't get at least like this /beg/ level, there's something wrong with you. Ask her to draw a car or a full scene, then we'll see.

[Anonymous No.4274692]

>>4274665
Also the older example is always some low effort garbage that they didn't spend much time on. Of course if you copy a photo, add colours and spend loads of time on it, it's going to look better than some shitty doodle.

>>4274629
Talent is real though, but people think it's this weird thing like you chose a perk in some RPG game and now everything you do is better, in reality it's heavily influenced by environmental parameters, including how much fucking work you put into it.

[Anonymous No.4275331]

Retards. OP isnt talent. However all you fags who cant get here in 4 whole years are Anti-Talented.

[Anonymous No.4275336]

>>4273951
to flex on begs

[Anonymous No.4275350]

>>4274676
Basically this.

Having looked through their profile, the few pieces that don't appear to be heavily referenced/photo studies are significantly lower in quality and in an artstle that looks completely different to the one in OP's screenshot.

Only a pleb would comission someone to get an exact copy of the reference photo they provide.

[Anonymous No.4275367]

talent is real
girls only care about looks
epstein didnt kill himself
none of you will make it

[Anonymous No.4275370]

Her work from imagination looks pretty good imo

[Anonymous No.4275380]

it seems like their 2019 OC is super weak compared to their obvious photo studies

[Anonymous No.4275492]

>>4273951
I am unironically close, except that I started my digital art in 2014.

Took me five years to get something like a photorealistic portrait.

Is a lot of really good progress but not totally uncommon if you practice every day.

Five years is still a lot.

[Anonymous No.4275676]

>>4274629
Thats exactly why I'm saying "100 drawn pictures" and not "100 posted pictures"

[Anonymous No.4275696]

>>4273951
>posting photo study meme to try and flex

[Anonymous No.4275698]

>>4275380
this is disappointing

[Anonymous No.4275699]

>>4275380
>>4275370
Conflicted once again by one tiny piece in this person's collection