Post your AI art here

[Anonymous No.4239279]

AI art/theory thread
I use artbreeder

My theory is that art will soon branch off from direct production to where humans may begin to produce and cultivate art as how they would with livestock or crops.

The parameters I worked with using Ganbreeder was not involved with the content of the art itself, rather the germination material and how I directed the flow of AI output through reiterating generation after generation, to where the forms featured in the output began to match closer to my instinctive creative cravings.

Discuss

[Anonymous No.4239281]

>>4239279

[Anonymous No.4239282]

>>4239281
More of my work.

[Anonymous No.4239289]

>>4239282

[Anonymous No.4239290]

>>4239289

[Anonymous No.4239291]

>>4239290

[Anonymous No.4239294]

>>4239291

[Anonymous No.4239319]

>>4239294

[Anonymous No.4239323]

>>4239294
This is horrifying

[Anonymous No.4239325]

>>4239323
pic related is (you)

[Anonymous No.4239327]

>>4239319

[Anonymous No.4239331]

>>4239327

[Anonymous No.4239333]

>>4239279
Uncle Ted was right, tech is a mistake

[Anonymous No.4239387]

Just draw alreadyh

[Anonymous No.4239389]

>>4239333
Based and tedpilled

[Anonymous No.4239416]

>>4239279
how do I get in on this?

[Anonymous No.4239481]

>>4239416
Artbreeder.com

Have fun

[Anonymous No.4239563]

>>4239331

[Anonymous No.4239600]

>>4239563
sheeeeeeeit

[Anonymous No.4239611]

>>4239600
Cosmic ahegao

[Anonymous No.4239621]

>>4239279
Surprise, like 99.5% of what is sold under the label of AI it is utter shit

[Anonymous No.4239638]

>>4239621
No surprise; to a faggot that pumps butts instead of offering substantive argumentation to back their art critiques, everything is utter shit.

[Anonymous No.4239640]

>>4239611

[Anonymous No.4239643]

>>4239640

[Anonymous No.4239644]

>>4239643

[Anonymous No.4239645]

>>4239644

[Anonymous No.4239652]

>>4239645

[Anonymous No.4239654]

>>4239652

[Anonymous No.4239655]

>>4239654

[Anonymous No.4239656]

>>4239655

[Anonymous No.4239657]

>>4239656

[Anonymous No.4239659]

>>4239657

[Anonymous No.4239660]

>>4239659

[Anonymous No.4239662]

>>4239660

[Anonymous No.4239663]

>>4239662

[Anonymous No.4239665]

>>4239663

[Anonymous No.4239693]

[Anonymous No.4239741]

>>4239693
Moar plz

[Anonymous No.4239746]

>this thread
Looks like abstract/post-modern artists should be placed on suicide watch.
Good riddance.

[Anonymous No.4239770]

>>4239746
Look here, m8. I hate postmodernism, too. I want the art I make to be authentic extensions and innovations upon Western traditions, not subversions of Western traditions.

When it comes to AI, it's a tool that can just as easily augment the greatness of Western traditions.

If you want to help, you could at least tell us whether what you see either gets the West right, or misses the mark, in light of Western traditions.

[Anonymous No.4239772]

>>4239693

[Anonymous No.4239803]

I posted this here in the fall. Some of our stuff came out pretty similar, showing the limitations of the program.

But yeah I think with a more sophisticated process AI+human combo could be a cool thing.

[Anonymous No.4239805]

>>4239279
I posted this here in the fall. Some of our stuff came out pretty similar, showing the limitations of the program.

But yeah I think with a more sophisticated process AI+human combo could be a cool thing.

[Anonymous No.4239808]

>>4239805
this is nightmare fuel

[Anonymous No.4239813]

>>4239808
Thank you. I see it as how our soon to be born AI overlords see us.

I was contemplating making one into a big oil painting, perhaps the one reminiscent of la demoiselles d'avignon as a nod to Picasso, but I want to explore way more AI tools, first.

[Anonymous No.4239819]

>>4239805
Nice job maximizing the cultivation of humanoid subjects at such a dense level (especially the fourth one in the second row); I'd imagine those took many generations to produce.

[Anonymous No.4239826]

>>4239819
Thanks, I dunno I spent about an hour fiddling around. I'm hoping there's a more versatile program or process out there, but I know almost zilch about this stuff right now.

I think the most legit thing would be to *learn to code* and make my own.

[Anonymous No.4239829]

>>4239813
>I want to explore way more AI tools, first.
Another thing you could keep in mind as you expand your arsenal is the idea of also exploring all the different methods of translating the generated visual data to other mediums.

For example, not only could you paint up a facsimile of an AI generated work, but also you could take what you see, apply some kind of tansformative process, and let that become the output of what you end up painting.

Also, you could use other mediums, like sculpture, translating that 2D data to the 3rd dimension as you see it, or from other envisioned perspectives.

If you're interested in video art, you could program a laser to trace out representational forms from the picture in real time onto various different shapes, as well.

The possibilities are endless, especially these days.

[Anonymous No.4239840]

>>4239829
>The possibilities are endless, especially these days.
Indeed, a blessing and a curse. Sometimes I think it'd be nicer to have been an artist 200 years ago. Aesthetic conventions were so rigid and narrow that it was easy to respond to them.

Okay, I'll write up *another* AI to analyse the possibilities and decide for me.

[Anonymous No.4239841]

>>4239279
Looks so much like Dali.

[Anonymous No.4239846]

I see absolutely nothing interesting in this thread

[Anonymous No.4239849]

I like making very moody ones. Absolutely love artbreeder.

[Anonymous No.4239851]

>>4239849
This looks nice and all, although, I'd go in there and paint over some of the edges, sharpen things up.

But I don't really get why you would use the ai to make something that someone just painting in photoshop could make. Why not use it to create things you couldn't think of on your own?

[Anonymous No.4239864]

S O U L L E S S

[Anonymous No.4240140]

>>4239851
>Why not use it to create things you couldn't think of on your own?
^proof that you've never tried using AI tools on your own, and that you might not be an actual artist.

A master artist can paint with any brush. Any artist who knows what he's doing can simply master whatever tool he comes across with pure intention; a plebslave artist is a slave to their tools.

As when a master artist uses a paintbrush, he knows what he craves and manipulates his brush to achieve what he desires; so when using tools like Artbreeder, a master artist knows what he craves and manipulates the genomes of each generation of images to achieve what he desires.

So the question still remains: why use AI over other tools?

There's many different answers to this dependent on the artist.

Some would ask in return, "why use a calculator over a slipstick?" Or, "why use photoshop over paint&canvas?"

Economically speaking, improvents in technology increases our production potential. So one common reason why artists would gravitate to AI is that they're able to not only produce more works suitable for his craft with less effort, but also there comes an expansion of possibilities of visual exploration and manipulation that was previously unheard of, bringing art forward at an exponential rate.

Not only that, but also it raises the bar for other mediums to compete and expand in technique. There is then an interexchange of ideas between the output of new mediums like AI and the input for new works made from older mediums.

Personally, the reason why I gravitate to AI is that it's a catalyst for expansion of my understanding of how art will be in the future, and the exploration of different ways to apply western traditions to newer technologically advanced mediums.

Any more questions?

[Anonymous No.4240146]

>>4239864
What do you think constitutes as "soul" in art, anon?

[Anonymous No.4240299]

>>4240140
Hi Joel! You're brilliant.

>>4239851
The choices you make to shape the vision you are after. A lot of it is chance, which gives way to choice. Gets skill our of the way and let's you craft what feels right.

Posting a few more abstracted ones I've done.

[Anonymous No.4240301]

>>4240299

[Anonymous No.4240303]

>>4240301

[Anonymous No.4240307]

>>4240303

[Anonymous No.4240310]

>>4240307

[Anonymous No.4240312]

>>4240310

[Anonymous No.4240313]

>>4240312

[Anonymous No.4240314]

>>4240312
This is what people look like in both my dreams and nightmares

[Anonymous No.4240342]

>>4240140
Do you have any understanding of how any of this works?

[Anonymous No.4240687]

>>4240314
Neat. Maybe other people would feel that way too. I’ll make more with that seed.

[Anonymous No.4240767]

>>4240140
You really misinterpreted my comment. I'm saying you *should* use AI and that the possibilities stretch far beyond painting another boring head study.

Really embarrassing how arrogant and longwinded you got when you're literally just agreeing with me for multiple paragraphs.

>>4240299
I don't disagree with that, just saying you can use AI to expand that vision, also.

[Anonymous No.4240772]

>>4239770
muh west

[Anonymous No.4240812]

>>4240767
Oops friendly fire; I don't take back what I said though.

>>4240299
Who's Joel?

[Anonymous No.4240824]

>>4240812
>^proof that you've never tried using AI tools on your own, and that you might not be an actual artist.
>I don't take back what I said though.

Ouch, man.

[Anonymous No.4240899]

i just use deepart.io sometimes

this is mc escher x anime

[Anonymous No.4240902]

>>4240899

[Anonymous No.4240904]

>>4240902

[Anonymous No.4240928]

>>4239663
>>4239662
>>4239660
>>4239657
>>4239656
I want to fuck those blobs

[Anonymous No.4240931]

>>4240824
Ok i'll buy that greentxt back

[Anonymous No.4240938]

>>4240928
Thanks for your input. It's really interesting how you were able to pick up on the erotic subject matter I was going for.

[Anonymous No.4240939]

>>4240928
me too, wonder what that means

[Anonymous No.4240950]

>>4240939
My theory is that the AI technology picks up on representational data that is harmonious to human faculties of pattern recognition.

Basically, the AI produces a mixture of representational data that can be percieved by humans, evoking subconscious recognition of forms.

That's why when looking at this art from the corner of your eye, you think you might be seeing certain things, but when you actually look at the picture consciously, it tends to be moreover an abstract jumble of forms.

What I did when making those erotic ones, I was aiming at developing forms and representations of an erotic nature. Looking at it, there are visual triggerforms that are normally found on certain places of the human body assembled in a sort of orgiastic collage independent of anthropomorphic form.

[Anonymous No.4241043]

[Anonymous No.4241291]

>>4240902

[Anonymous No.4241335]

>>4241291

[Anonymous No.4241339]

>>4241335

[Anonymous No.4241340]

>>4241339

[Anonymous No.4241350]

>>4239279
I made this rn in the site you posted, it's very very neat

[Anonymous No.4241373]

>>4241350
>*good jobs*
Moar plz

[Anonymous No.4241375]

>>4241350
Did you use any flower genes for that one?

[Anonymous No.4241381]

>>4241373
>>4241375
I don't know, I just went on the site and started clicking

[Anonymous No.4241393]

>>4241381
The site is really great at creating these wonderfully distorted humanoid shapes. If I was a tailor and a sculptor I'd bring these things to life

[Anonymous No.4241399]

>>4241393
Clothier I mean, maybe a photographer too. Some of these give me an indescribable melancholic feeling

[Anonymous No.4241400]

>>4241399

[Anonymous No.4241403]

>>4241400

[Anonymous No.4241406]

>>4241393
Another really cool thing is how our decisions end up influencing future decisions of all other users. It's setting the stage to bring the minds of humanity together in a great polyphony of thought, cravings and intention.

[Anonymous No.4241409]

>>4241403
That one's especially good; keeping a clear subject with a simple background oftentimes takes a considerable amount of skill (at least for me).

[Anonymous No.4241439]

>>4241406

[Anonymous No.4241447]

>>4241403

[Anonymous No.4241448]

fucking love this website so much. it creates compositions and atmospheres that i'd never dream of

[Anonymous No.4241449]

>>4241447

[Anonymous No.4241451]

>>4241449

[Anonymous No.4241453]

>>4241451

[Anonymous No.4241455]

>>4241453

[Anonymous No.4241458]

>>4241455

[Anonymous No.4241460]

>>4241458

[Anonymous No.4241462]

>>4241460

[Anonymous No.4241465]

>>4241462

[Anonymous No.4241467]

>>4241465

[Anonymous No.4241469]

>>4241467

[Anonymous No.4241470]

>>4241469
Kinda looks like a woman there

[Anonymous No.4241471]

>>4241470
hehe, doggy

[Anonymous No.4241473]

>>4241471

[Anonymous No.4241476]

>>4241473
Illuminati queen

[Anonymous No.4241569]

>lol so random
Im still waiting for those bots to put out something meaningful

[Anonymous No.4241712]

>>4241569
>waiting for those bots
That's as stupid as waiting for a paintbrush to begin floating around and painting something by itself.

>something "meaningful"
What to you constitutes as "meaningful" in art, anon?

[Anonymous No.4241964]

>>4241439
5head 3 thicc

[Anonymous No.4241965]

>>4241964

[Anonymous No.4241966]

>>4241965

[Anonymous No.4241967]

>>4241966

[Anonymous No.4241969]

>>4241967

[Anonymous No.4241971]

>>4241969

[Anonymous No.4241974]

>>4241971

[Anonymous No.4241976]

>>4241974

[Anonymous No.4241978]

>>4241976

[Anonymous No.4241983]

Hello,

I’d like to announce that those who have participated in this thread and have posted AI-produced paintings are 100% without a doubt NGMI.

[Anonymous No.4241988]

[Anonymous No.4242016]

>>4241983
>ngmi
We already know we're Naturally Gifted Master Innovators; thanks for stating the obvious anyway, bro

[Anonymous No.4242028]

>>4241988
Saki is merely an artifact from the early 2000s.

[Anonymous No.4242047]

I want Scott Eaton's access to whatever the fuck AI he's playing with.

[Anonymous No.4242063]

>>4241399
Perhaps the words you're looking for is "soul"

[Anonymous No.4242069]

>>4242047
Here's a video of him explaining some of his techniques: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TN7Ydx9ygPo&feature=emb_title

[Anonymous No.4242076]

>activity that takes zero effort or skill makes for one of the most active threads on /ic/
Figures

[Anonymous No.4242078]

>>4242063
Scrolling fast on mobile gives some very interesting optical illusions, the shadows give an impression of a morphing trail.

[Anonymous No.4242086]

>>4242076
>it takes zero effort or skill to use AI
Saying that is as retarded as saying it takes zero effort or skill to hold a brush.

[Anonymous No.4242135]

>>4242086
Not really

[Anonymous No.4242160]

[Anonymous No.4242161]

[Anonymous No.4242162]

[Anonymous No.4242202]

>>4242161
Reminds me of Ghost in the Shell

[Anonymous No.4242208]

>>4242135
>literally has no rational argumentation whatsoever
ok weaboomer

[Anonymous No.4242332]

>>4241978

[Anonymous No.4242531]

>>4242332
Bearded male subjects dump

[Anonymous No.4242532]

>>4242531

[Anonymous No.4242535]

>>4242532

[Anonymous No.4242536]

>>4242535

[Anonymous No.4242537]

>>4242536
/dump

[Anonymous No.4242538]

>>4242537

[Anonymous No.4242539]

Yes, more nightmare fuel. I look forward to all the atrocities you'll post today!

[Anonymous No.4242550]

>>4242539
Aww thanx fren

[Anonymous No.4242552]

Cassandra's repose

[Anonymous No.4242555]

>>4242552
Great work cultivating that traditional women's style anon

[Anonymous No.4242583]

>>4239282
Backstage at Motown
>>4239327
Data of gunship on sulfur planet
>>4239652
Tarantino presents: Transhuman Travolta and friends
>>4239654
Maiden, Mother, Crone and Crow
>>4239662
Fallopian tube six pack
>>4239693
Fae of the Marianas
>>4239805
Questionable sexual tastes
>>4239819
Temple of Entropy
>>4239849
A taste of hate
>>4240299
Persephone's android reads by the shore
>>4240301
Secrets, gossip, ladies, thicket
>>4240303
Adulation of the Anomaly
>>4240307
Aiko pauses in the ruins of her childhood home
>>4240312
Fry escaping the Dementor, Boardwalk, Dusk
>>4240313
The weight of your wealth will drown you
>>4240899
Ancient farms; Modern fascinations
>>4241335
The robot blinked against the glare of salt flats, it's probes unfurling their wings
>>4241350
Spirit of excess and decay
>>4241393
We have ever lived in the forest
>>4241399
Spectre in the hall
>>4241451
Deep sea squid
>>4241453
Little Edward in his fish head, Grade 6 finishing school, 1822.
>>4241467
Soft ears, strange flutes
>>4242016
Red blood cell
>>4242063
Awaiting the inevitable
>>4242161
Techno-rat bends the knee
>>4242162
There is coral where the redwoods used to be
>>4242538
The Thin Man and Layla's beautiful day
>>4242552
Cassandra's Repose

[Anonymous No.4242592]

>>4242583
this is the best form of autism

[Anonymous No.4242609]

>>4242555
Thank you, anon.

[Anonymous No.4242635]

>>4242583

[Anonymous No.4243076]

Bump

[Anonymous No.4243108]

Don't stop daddy I need more AI art. Cultivate it harder daddy I'm getting stirred up inside!!

[Anonymous No.4243318]

>>4243108

[Anonymous No.4243320]

>>4243318

[Anonymous No.4243321]

>>4243320

[Anonymous No.4243341]

>>4243318
>>4243320
>>4243321
Nice. Let's do animal faces and human faces and see what fucked up shit it makes

[Anonymous No.4243831]

>>4243341

[Anonymous No.4243833]

>>4243831

[Anonymous No.4243837]

>>4243833

[Anonymous No.4243838]

>>4243837

[Anonymous No.4243854]

>>4243838

[Anonymous No.4243856]

>>4243854

[Anonymous No.4243857]

>>4243856

[Anonymous No.4243869]

>>4240146
Not anon you were responding to, but imo it's shorthand for something that looks like it's been made by human hands, rather than automation.

[Anonymous No.4243939]

>>4243869
>made by human hands
What do you mean by that?
I "used my hands" when I signified my creative decisions through clicking/tapping the screen and adjusting the generation parameters.

The appearance of the level of involvement of an artist with his creation is independent from the nature & output tendencies of his medium. An artist can be just as involved with his work through AI as he can be with paint&canvas.

Perhaps you could go more in detail of what you actually mean by "soul"?

[Anonymous No.4243940]

>>4243939

[Anonymous No.4243941]

>>4243940

[Anonymous No.4243943]

>>4243941

[Anonymous No.4243975]

>>4243939
The qualitative distinction here is that actually painting or otherwise physically creating something exhibits a much higher level of involvement than whatever you post here. So I strongly disagree with your statement. What you are doing here is an extremely low level of art, if at all.

>>4243869
I don't personally use the term "soul", but what I usually look for is the amount of conscious decisions that are specific to the artist that have been put into the work. I don't believe that art is just about the effect on the observer, it's a gibberish definition that makes no sense to me.

[Anonymous No.4244177]

>>4243975
Look, AI is going to do any skill we can do better than we can do it. It's an inevitability, whether you see it coming or not. Skill is going to be out of the equation. All things being equal, guess what that leaves as the new standard for excellence?

Taste. Style. Vision. If skill is an AI assisted tabula rasa, he who has the most beautiful, meaningful, or otherwise cohesive vision wins the day. Your taste alone will, within your lifetime, determine the course of your success.

[Anonymous No.4244425]

>>4244177
>Look, AI is going to do any skill we can do better than we can do it.
That sentence means nothing. What is skill and how do we judge that? Take your the picture you attached: I see a lot of randomness, a lot of expressionless glitchy looking blobs and structures that just seem to exist to fill the space. To me that is not skill. A skillful painter is all about deliberation, actually understanding your motive. These GANs do not understand the motives on any deeper level. You can claim that we'll get there eventually, and maybe, but right now we are not even close.

>If skill is an AI assisted tabula rasa, he who has the most beautiful, meaningful, or otherwise cohesive vision wins the day.
First, art in my opinion isn't just about pretty pictures, it's about weaving in some deeper meaning into a piece. That takes a lot of control and deliberation. Second, I simply do not see a way to use AI effectively for art right now. What you are doing is simply insanely inefficient. Yes, you produce tons of pretty little pictures, but it's basically randomly wandering around in the feature space the GAN has conquered. There is no fine-tuning involved, and I see no thread in those pictures, it is random and it looks random. In case you understand anything about these things: What you are doing is basically equivalent to Monte Carlo sampling, you will eventually get to some pretty good results, but you are not very effectively moving towards your objective, and the closer you move towards it, the harder it will be to refine your result. Actually painting is more like a minimizer: You deliberately make a decision about how most effectively reach your objective, and arrange your result precisely in order to achieve it. You think you are sitting behind the wheel, but actually you are sitting on the passenger seat.

I give AI this much: It's nice for inspiration if that is an issue. It will probably replace a lot of the low-level crafty art jobs in the near future.

[Anonymous No.4244461]

>faggot acts like he's hot shit for crunching his image folder through a pre-made algorithm

[Anonymous No.4244980]

>>4243975
>painting exhibits a much higher level of involvement
Wrong. Things or actions don't exhibit involvement, people do. It's up to the artist for how much involvement he chooses to exhibit regardless of the medium he works with.

>what I usually look for is the amount of conscious decisions that are specific to the artist that have been put into the work.
Again, you can't gauge exactly the amount of decisions an artist makes for his work just by looking at his choice of medium. It's the artist that makes creative decisions, not the medium.

>If skill is an AI assisted tabula rasa, he who has the most beautiful, meaningful, or otherwise cohesive vision wins the day. Your taste alone will, within your lifetime, determine the course of your success.
Interesting observation. While I do believe that those with less skill would gravitate themselves toward more technologically fluid & efficient mediums, I believe those with higher skills will still have a differentiative advantage over those less skilled, given that their higher amount of applied skill will amplify the merit of their work far beyond those who invest less skill into AI mediums.

Take an artist's skill, rate it from 1-10, then multiply it by 490 (AI tech), and you would see that those with higher skill are proportionately far greater than anyone with a skill rating of 1.

[Anonymous No.4244988]

>>4244461
*custom-made gene-influenced algorithm

[Anonymous No.4244992]

>>4244988
He didn't create the algorithm and "gene-influenced" is nothing but a buzzword

[Anonymous No.4245000]

>>4244980
>Wrong. Things or actions don't exhibit involvement, people do. It's up to the artist for how much involvement he chooses to exhibit regardless of the medium he works with.
>Again, you can't gauge exactly the amount of decisions an artist makes for his work just by looking at his choice of medium. It's the artist that makes creative decisions, not the medium.
That is simply not true. If your medium is a uniformly painted square, you have only one degree of freedom, you can choose one color. No matter how hard you think about that decision, it's just one decision, and that limits your involvement in the creation of the work. In an actual unconstrained painting you have basically infinitely many degrees of freedom and the work can potentially be far more expressive than a colored square. In the case of this GAN, you just have a very limited number of latent variables, which leads to less control and thus less expressiveness.

[Anonymous No.4245090]

>>4245000
>you have only 1 degree of freedom by choosing 1 color
>There's only 1 decision in that scenario

Wrong. In that context you defined, there is still an abundant degree of freedom even with only one color. How you apply the paint onto the square can vary in many many different ways. Example parameters in your context includes:

* what technique you use to apply the paint to canvas
* what type of paint
* the thickness of the coating
* the distribution of thickness
* the preferred style of lighting for the piece
* if you choose a traditional paintbrush, the types of strokes you use to achieve certain effects
* etc. etc. etc.

Those parameters I mentioned alone could multiply the complexity of the piece at the very least to a degree that would be indicative of a highly-skilled artist.

Every medium has its limitations, and how an artist navigates such limitations can also reveal the "soul" of the artist just as well.

[Anonymous No.4245096]

>>4245090
I literally defined it as a uniformly painted square, please stop being an idiot, it's an academic example. The point is, that there definitely are innate limitations to a medium, which you can literally count when it comes to digital stuff. You can try to romanticize it as much as you like, but that is just a fact.

[Anonymous No.4245100]

>>4239279
Fuck the “AI vs painting” argument look at this weird dog

[Anonymous No.4245103]

>>4245100
Weird dog time

[Anonymous No.4245107]

>>4245103

[Anonymous No.4245123]

>>4245107

[Anonymous No.4245128]

>>4245123

[Anonymous No.4245149]

>>4245123
i love him.

[Anonymous No.4245153]

>>4245128

[Anonymous No.4245155]

>>4245153

[Anonymous No.4245156]

>>4245155

[Anonymous No.4245157]

>>4245156

[Anonymous No.4245159]

>>4245157

[Anonymous No.4245308]

>>4245159

[Anonymous No.4245313]

>>4245308
Hefty lad

[Anonymous No.4246019]

>>4245313
We should probably make an /ai/ board of its own

[Anonymous No.4246022]

>>4246019
NEET doggo

[Anonymous No.4246023]

>>4246022

[Anonymous No.4246025]

>>4246023

[Anonymous No.4246026]

>>4246025

[Anonymous No.4246172]

>>4239819
Your verbosity is pretentious and bothersome, especially since you're not creating anything novel - you're pushing a button on a machine running code that someone else wrote while pontificating on what ultimately distills to a dull, boring and shallow view of 'art'.

[Anonymous No.4246280]

>>4246172
>you're not creating anything novel, you're just doing (x)

What a pathetic, dull & boring argument.
"Omg ur just PAINTING? Ur not creating anythong novel! Ur just doin the same shit other people done for 1000s of years!!!1!1!!! Using a fuckin brush that someone else made? Unoriginal!!!1!11!!!! MyAhhHHhHhh"
You literally cannot be anymore shallow with your view of art, weaboomer.

[Anonymous No.4246286]

>>4246026
this one looks comfy, great art would look at again

[Anonymous No.4246297]

>>4246280
WAH WAH PAT MY ASS FOR USING AUTOMATIC SOFTWARE BOOHOO IM SUCH AN INTELLECTUAL

[Anonymous No.4246303]

>>4246297
r/Whoosh

[Anonymous No.4246379]

>>4246026
Anyway time for more weird dogs

[Anonymous No.4246382]

>>4246379

[Anonymous No.4246388]

>>4246382

[Anonymous No.4246395]

>>4246388

[Anonymous No.4246572]

>>4246395

[Anonymous No.4246573]

>>4246572

[Anonymous No.4246710]

>>4239279
you niggers, rafkin anadol is ahead of the curve with this shit. Pertentious fuck with your theory of cropshit.

[Anonymous No.4247085]

>>4246573

[Anonymous No.4247086]

>>4247085

[Anonymous No.4247088]

>>4247086
been trying to create specifically very round dogs

[Anonymous No.4247092]

>>4247088

[Anonymous No.4247094]

>>4247092
little man

[Anonymous No.4247294]

why is this thread still up

[Anonymous No.4247648]

>>4247294
B/c there needs to be an /ai/ board

[Anonymous No.4247649]

>>4247094

[Anonymous No.4247651]

>>4246710
AI can potentially go in many directions, but your namedrop of anadol is still respected.

[Anonymous No.4247664]

>>4247294
Because some retard thinks every little turd he drops is gold

[Anonymous No.4248978]

>>4247094
Kyooti <3

[Anonymous No.4250128]

Should've programmed it to know Loomis

[Anonymous No.4250132]

[Anonymous No.4250141]

[Anonymous No.4250142]

[Anonymous No.4250143]

[Anonymous No.4250144]

[Anonymous No.4250145]

[Anonymous No.4250146]

[Anonymous No.4250147]

[Anonymous No.4250152]

[Anonymous No.4250161]

[Anonymous No.4250162]

[Anonymous No.4250164]

[Anonymous No.4250166]

[Anonymous No.4250171]

[Anonymous No.4250172]

[Anonymous No.4250174]

[Anonymus No.4250588]

is it already possible to upload your own photos and pictures and morph them with anything? gibe link if so

[Anonymous No.4250912]

>>4250588
It is, but there's a limited amount that you could upload, unless you have premium.

[Anonymous No.4251223]

I think you can only upload to general and portrait not landscape and anime.

[Anonymus No.4251227]

>>4251223
sound fishy tbqh