[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/ic/ - Artwork/Critique


View post   

File: 308 KB, 1108x1661, A5466FE5-907A-437C-B6B0-D638577D19FE.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4105878 No.4105878 [Reply] [Original]

pyw and others comment on how much they would pay for it/a commission at that level

curious so here’s a wip, am i ngmi

>> No.4105932

>>4105878
These price check threads are inherently flawed. Art does not have a flat, static value. You cannot look at something and say it's worth $200, or $35, or $2000, because that is not how illustration is priced (unless you're one of those morons using a fast-food style commission chart).

>> No.4105944

>>4105878
You’d have to pay me to take that drawing

>> No.4105971
File: 1.16 MB, 646x938, polishsakimichan.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4105971

>>4105878

>> No.4106011
File: 574 KB, 467x569, elgoblina.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4106011

>>4105878

>> No.4106014

>>4105971
stupid whore 0 dollars i hate women

im polish aswell btw

>> No.4106017

>>4106014
I'm glad we agree

>> No.4106242
File: 1.48 MB, 1961x1503, ridgebackport.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4106242

I currently charge £60 for a5 size pet portraits

>> No.4106301

>>4105878
>zero
>>4105971
>US $450.00
>>4106011
>zero
>>4106242
>USD $25.00
/ic/ is a bad place to ask this. nobody's actually paying for commissions here.

>> No.4106332

>>4105878
>$5
from friends and family
>>4105971
>$250-$300
sakimichan clone
>>4106011
>$10
you could probably sell to tumblrites that like colorful man-face
>>4106242
>$60
you could get a lot more doing traditional. people really fucking love their pets.

>> No.4106347

>>4106011
$-5
give me your lunch money and I'll forget I saw it

>> No.4106450

>>4106332
>people really fucking love their pets.
This. I know someone who makes significantly more just doing pet portraits for rich people.

>> No.4106465
File: 2.89 MB, 1653x2339, death1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4106465

I wonder, how much money would some madman give for my shit?

>> No.4106468

>>4105971
That's not your work, retard.

>> No.4106507

>>4105932
so how do you charge for commissions?

>> No.4106552

>>4106468
Marek-san?

>> No.4106627
File: 1.31 MB, 2074x2919, 03.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4106627

>>4105878
Posting again, didn't get a reply last thread

>> No.4106628
File: 1.07 MB, 2504x1994, 01.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4106628

>>4106627
Also

>> No.4106679

>>4106465
>$5
>>4106627
>>4106628
$0.0

>> No.4106683
File: 41 KB, 400x416, 1528058216097.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4106683

WHEN WILL I FINALLY BE GOOD ENOUGH TO MAKE MONEY
I WANNA BUY THINGS

>> No.4106719

>>4106332
I know I could get more doing traditional, problem is it just takes so much longer that the pricing would be ridiculous and no one would be able to afford it

>> No.4106721
File: 1.52 MB, 3324x2393, img242.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4106721

>>4106332
Forgot to add, this took me around 2 weeks, a4 size in watercolour

>> No.4106730
File: 552 KB, 2242x1584, IMG_2219.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4106730

>> No.4106732

>>4106242
sounds about right
>>4106465
Wouldn't buy. I hate occult stuff.

>> No.4106802

>>4106721
65 usd

>> No.4106805

>>4106802
For that price (I'm gb) it wouldn't be worth doing it because of the time it takes me. 2-3 weeks of work for that means I'm not even making minimum wage, that's why I moved over to digital

>> No.4106823

>>4106721
This is really good, around 150 would be fair, can be even slightly more.

>> No.4107084
File: 278 KB, 1122x1120, tranquil.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4107084

>>4105878

>> No.4107087

>>4106721
I'd pay around $100 USD.

>> No.4107113

>>4106721
no idea what other people saw on this one, but it looks pretty shitty to me, wouldn't pay a dollar for it. how do you spend so much time in something as unpolished?
good news is, i don't decide the price, but the market

>> No.4107118

>>4107113
Dude pyw

>> No.4107128

>>4107118
the whole point of the thread is putting yourself in the mind of a client. clients aren't supposed to do your job better than you.
also, i don't use fucking watercolors, i only do digital, like normal people.

>> No.4107138

>>4107128
you fucking moron-- no, that's not what the thread is for.
it's to put yourself in the shoes of a client who would like to buy that sort of work. it's about MARKET price, not what you personally like or dislike.
jesus fucking christ.

>> No.4107155

>>4107138
my honest, unbiased opinion on your shitty drawing is representative at least of some segment of the market, retard
grow sime skin, or take it like you want, i don't care

>> No.4107158

>>4107155
no that's not how it works. how about you take a basic stats class brainlet.
I'm not the guy who made it. Horses are the lowest tier of animal.

>> No.4107162

>>4107158
sure, i'll take a class, and will pay for a market study on your shitty watercolor before stating my annonymous opinion on the "how much do you pay for it" thread

>> No.4107178

>>4107162
do that retard, but make sure you understand the difference between the hypothetical individual which represents the ideal buyer and your autistic ass before you do, okay?

>> No.4107278

>>4107128
I'm not even the op. Refusing to post work just reaffirms my guess you don't know shit and are just crabbing. Begone, /beg/

>> No.4107415
File: 100 KB, 981x1280, IMG_20190905_221449_925.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4107415

Posting here again, here's a commission I made a long time back and I wanted to know if it was under/overpriced.

Thanks!

>> No.4107552

>>4106465
absolute minimum of 20.
That shit is good. The colour is a bit boring and repetitive so maybe focus on colour theory.

>> No.4107556

>>4106507
I guess that depends on the detail, size, quality the person wants

>> No.4107939
File: 109 KB, 1280x1010, da.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4107939

>> No.4107984

>>4106242
That is amazing. Do you get many comissions at this price? Do you do them from life or photo?

>> No.4108002

>>4105971
>watermark on top of signature
I hope this person dies horribly.

>> No.4108051

>>4107415
70, how much you charged that time?

>> No.4108339

>>4107984
I've had interest, but no one willing to pay £60 for one. Need better places than discord and DA to advertise but I'm not aware of other places

>> No.4108343

>>4107984
Sorry for multi replies it's late, I do these from photos. Thank you for the compliment!

>> No.4108641

>>4106017
how do you know he's really polish though?

>> No.4108658

>>4105971
best of the thread by far. this guy could get a real job if he wanted

>> No.4108928

>>4105971
>>4106014
>polish
is this a new meme? like calling yourself shiny and chrome?

>> No.4109653

>>4108051
Less than half that ;_;

>> No.4109690

>>4109653
it's worth $20 at much: it doesn't really look very professional
anons here are retarded at real life market, or maybe they can't let go the 1st world overpricing mentality

>> No.4109747

>>4108928
I snorted.

>> No.4109770

i wouldnt pay a dime for any of the fucking garbage in this thread and dont even ask me to post my work because you are all beneath me and don't deserve my fucking effort get good

>> No.4110211

>>4109770
i'm a begginer, but i wouldn't pay nothing for 90% stuff itt, because it's just not good enough. you don't need to be an artist to have have a clue
>>4105878
>others comment on how much they would pay for it
REAL cost is usually unrelated to the quality of the work. some guy with the right contacts can sell a shit stain on a canvas for millions

>> No.4110313
File: 143 KB, 1052x1210, 039D27BF-F88E-4D5A-9DC7-CC6C46766BDD.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4110313

Got 50 for this drawing of a stuffed animal for a book

>> No.4110317

>>4110313
is it just me or does this look like a filter
(not accusing, just)

>> No.4110385

>>4110317
Just you

>> No.4110749

>>4110313
consider yourself lucky. that's x10 its worth

>> No.4110772

>>4106683
20 years

>> No.4110780

>>4110313
its lovely
feels oddly incomplete because it cuts off at a weird angle, but its so cute and has a nice style

>> No.4110788

>>4110317
it certainly does, because all the strokes look random and lacking any intention, like those autopainting filters from like a decade ago

>> No.4110790

>>4105878
Why are you holding on to this sketch, anon? You posted this in the /beg/ thread about a week ago, and you were told how mediocre it is, and yet you haven't improved. It's not that good, do it again

>> No.4110791

>>4108002
Why is that so bad?

>> No.4110797

>>4106242
Is this digital? I could only see paying £60 for that if it were a real painting.

>> No.4110925

>>4110797
Its digital. I couldn't do 60 for traditional because of the time it takes

>> No.4110999

>>4110925
I don't see why the digital one would be valued as high. I understand charging £60-100 if it were a comission, but you could sell hundreds of these. Part of the value of art is in its unique-ness, imo. Were you planning to sell only a few?

>> No.4111004

>>4110925
i'm sure it takes you a lot of time, but it really doesn't show. some random scribbles like a photoshop filter and the most boring background possible just doesn't make it for me

>> No.4111132
File: 2.43 MB, 1080x1347, 20190911_223207.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4111132

Tell me what you think

>> No.4111149

>>4111132
3 dollars

>> No.4111273

>>4111132
very cool
$50-$100? i dunno i'm not buying anything anyway

>> No.4111279

>>4111132
>3$
>100$

these threads are for morons why would you ask this absolutely retarded community who arent selling shit anyway

>> No.4111351

>>4111132
if its a commission, id say $40 minimum $80 maximum. if you're just selling the print, you could probably get $8 for it

>> No.4112985

>>4111004
What would you suggest for backgrounds?