[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/ic/ - Artwork/Critique


View post   

File: 33 KB, 400x564, 2A2FD97E-F641-423A-BC35-E40435013777.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4102883 No.4102883 [Reply] [Original]

Is Dean Yeagle a “good” artist by /ic/ standards? How hard is it to learn to draw in this sort of cartoonish style as opposed to something more realistic?

>> No.4102902
File: 13 KB, 250x250, 1446770978306.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4102902

>/ic/ standards

>> No.4102906

Looks fine to me, although very "Western cringe porn comics" in terms of style.

>> No.4102908

This is the ultimate example of deviantart trash aesthetics.

>> No.4102909

>>4102906
>>4102908
Well considering he had his comics published in Playboy magazine I guess that makes sense.

>> No.4102962
File: 82 KB, 564x767, 394f044fdd91884afeb8dbbfd2a3f675.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4102962

Imagine spearheading a team at Disney and Yeagle walks in with a portfolio. You can tell him to animate anything you want. He'd be a dream to work with, but he got stuck working in New York animation studios...

>> No.4102982
File: 76 KB, 564x729, 8e84b9ba74eb27efdf60d4638dc77b57.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4102982

>>4102962
He really should've been a big part of the Disney renaissance in the 1980's and 90's. I don't know maybe he was but I haven't seen a bio that mentioned it

>> No.4102985
File: 86 KB, 564x717, e745484c37e3404d784348a2a6d25361.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4102985

>> No.4102993

>>4102982
Did he do character design for Disney but not much sequential animation?

>> No.4103114
File: 157 KB, 900x758, 1563333050239.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4103114

>>4102909
Oh, I see. Well, the blow-up doll face is disgusting, but everything else is pretty cool. Too bad the face is a major part of style.

>> No.4103129

Porn is always boring trash.

>> No.4103179

>>4103129
>Pin up == porn

Go back to /pol/. I would say have sex but I'm an incel tbqh

>> No.4103270

>>4102883
I love Yeagle's stuff

>> No.4103273

>>4103114
the way he plays with anatomy is very western too though ; specifically what I'm caught up on is the huge fucking calves.

>> No.4103279

>>4103273
What's the problema with that? It's something Chris Sanders does as well and his drawings are appealing and rythmic as hell, for the style is really good

>> No.4103281

He is rad, only faggots who hasnt pull a decent body/gesture on their lives would Say the opposite.

>> No.4103283

>>4102908
I wonder if the people who make this kinds of claims has ever drawn/studies something out of stuff anime shit, I guess not.

>> No.4103287

>>4103279
the problem is I dislike it; they look like ragdolls to me, not human beings, and I don't find the form appealing.
You can like it. I can't stop you even if I wanted to.

>> No.4103300
File: 800 KB, 1600x1200, 1538006275992.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4103300

>>4103273
Now that you mention it, indeed.
Luckily I suck at anatomy so it doesn't bother me at all, here's a very stylized pic I got from Pixiv recently whose calves I found very appealing.

>> No.4103301

>>4103300
why are you talking like a boomer anon? a-am i being trolled right now?

>> No.4103321

>>4102883
its shit by anyones standard, ic has
a very LOW standard when it comes to commercial art

>> No.4103323
File: 476 KB, 576x1599, 1564976484398.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4103323

>>4103301
What exactly sounds boomer to you?
I was being 100% unironic, but now you've struck a nerve and I just get the urge to shit on your apparent allergy to capitalization and ironically, passive-aggressively write with obnoxious slangs, zero punctuation and intentional mistakes like you're/your in order to paint you as the most basedfied, phoneposting zoomer in town. I won't do it, though, because I decided to go for this meta format instead.

Here are some real calves I saved yesterday, I liked their shape.

>> No.4103325

Mandy is a classic, porn or not. Coom has infected your brain if you think Mandy is porn desu.
Dean is a great artist and an example to follow for anyone here, porn artist or not.

>> No.4103334

>>4103323
lmao

>> No.4103337

>>4102883
/ic/ standards are anime biased, it's not just a meme. Anything western cartoons is ugly for this board

>> No.4103342

>>4103323
>what sounds boomer
it was the 'indeed' (only boomers and 11yos say this), the weird usage of commas, and your strange urge to tell me what you've jacked off to, with a story behind it (you couldn't just tell me what gets you hard, you have to tell me what site you got it from).

hopefully that helps you blend in in the future.

>> No.4103360

>>4103337
this, and the worst part is they talk like anime should be the rule to follow to make western stuff, is just so arrogant and stupid at the same time, im pretty sure people here would crab on great artist such as Cort loftis because the art looks "too western"people here ofetn wonder why they dont improve, I think that kind of mindset is a big stone on the road for anyone wanting to really learn art, weeb or not, on the bright side they are only spergs with zero sense of aesthetic

>> No.4103606
File: 790 KB, 618x614, 1551181927696.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4103606

>>4103342
Now that's what I call autistic, I give up.
How can half a line stating I liked calves in a picture on a discussion about calves be "making up a story"? Is believing a tweet-sized piece of text is equal to a book what it takes to "blend in" with zoomzoom cumbrains?
Were you telling us a story when you explained why you don't like OP's artist's calves? Who the fuck says ragdoll on a normal, 2019 conversation? Why not just do the current year thing and tell us straight-up you can't get a boner from it? Are you my great-grandfather or something?

As a last note, there is no way I'd "jack off" (you fucking degenerate vulgar shitstain faggot) to the anime picture I posted, as that butt looks terrible, the feet look terrible and overall I'm not thinking about sex or other people "jacking off" every waking moment of my life. Do you "jack off" when drawing from life? Do you "jack off" to grapes and bananas on a table?
>"Wow, anon, you're so talented! Can you draw a portrait of me?"
>"Sure thing, girl!"
>unzips pants

Here's another set of calves recently saved, in this case I believe the entire set from but to feet is helpful and pleasant.

>>4103337
>>4103360
Westerners often go for hyper-sexual characteristics like full lips and slut face, whereas anime goes into a more "cute", modest face aesthetic. It's only natural there'd be a rift like that. I for one appreciate some French artists, but other than that it's generally either manga-inspired or realism for me.

>> No.4103609

its great and if you no nose bug eyed slit mouthed weebs dont agree then go fuck yourself

>> No.4103613

>>4103606
lmao

>> No.4103619

wow this thread is fucked. Everyone get out, save yourselves

>> No.4103643
File: 80 KB, 563x729, 9f371940ab89b597646296a7021672ea.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4103643

His art is legitimately hilarious. The combination of tastelessness and satire can still make laugh

>> No.4103647

>>4102883
>>4102982
>>4102985
>>4103643
>Same dumb expression

Legitimately upsetting, I want to punch her the face. The fuck.

>> No.4103666

>>4103647
i want to punch you in the face fucko

>> No.4103692

I fucking hate this place sometimes, is flooded with brainless weebs that believe qt anime girls are the top of art, bug souless eyes and generic faces, gesture si stiff that a corpse would look lifelike un comparison, i'm not being sarcastic, thats why anime master artist are si valuated, they can see beyog thoose retarded paradigms, while you western weebs only consume shit that rots your brains.

>> No.4103709

>>4102908
>>4103273
>>4103287
I haven't seen people out themselves as /beg/ like this in awhile.

>> No.4103710
File: 2.90 MB, 466x256, 1422666088317.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4103710

>>4103709
I bet they're from the anime study general

>> No.4103724

>>4103710
Agree, only /beg/ weebs can reach thoose levels of retard.

>> No.4103726

>>4103692
yeah dude so much soul in this loser's OC character-- where she makes the same face every drawing and does weird gravity defying movements to show off her perfectly geometric ass.
I'm not a weeb either. If you like what's in the OP, what makes you any better-- it's the same generic style designed to get boomers horny.
>>4103709
>>4103710
comicfags
go ahead and tell me what makes the OP good.

>> No.4103729

>>4103709
>>4103710
>>4103724
I hate how so many people on /ic/ can't distinguish between a drawing in a style that they don't enjoy, and bad art.

>> No.4103735
File: 45 KB, 700x491, a6bpo79_700b.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4103735

>>4103726
If you don't see it then you havent picked a gesture book on your life, and that is not my problem, also how retarded you need to be to not see that he is drawing pin ups, good lord I swear this board is doomed, the only arguments I see against artist of western is "le lusty boomers XDXDXD".

>> No.4103740

>>4103735
you think the pose in the op has flow? are you retarded? how? because she's turning around? is that your definition of a good gesture?
>it's a pinup so it's meant to be bad
how he exaggerates anatomy is not interesting at all in an artist's sense at all-- it's literally how a child understands sex appeal, as a list meant to be ticked off.
the style is just geometric shapes CUTTING into each other with no further interaction. It's fucking trash. it looks jarring and incohesive.

do you have any argument yourself you fucking retard?

>> No.4103753

>>4103606
qt!

>> No.4103754
File: 59 KB, 473x612, original.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4103754

>>4103740
Dean Yeagle's stuff definitely has flow and it's one of the reasons I like his work so much, >>4102962 is probably the best example in this thread. It's okay to not like the style, but to say that his work don't have flow is objectively wrong.

>> No.4103769

>>4103740
Ok bro, i'm sorry I dindt knew you where that mentally retarded, my apologies.
Also, I hope you are baiting, otherwise it would be so sad to know someone thinks what you just said unironically, is just si ignorant, arrogant and complety idiotic that makes me cringe.

>> No.4103772

>>4103740
The post a work that you think has real flow, you fucking braindead cunt, you are just throwing shit that are pulling from your ass, you don't have a clue ir whatvare you talking about, so post something with real flow since you know better, go on, educate us, come on bring some of that golden wisdom on yours unto us.
I bet my ass you won't reply, or ir you do it Will be some tanget or some really stupid ass example complety disjointed of the subject matter.

>> No.4103779

>>4103740
POST

YOUR

FUCKING

WORK

>> No.4103782

>>4102883
Nobody is good if you go by /ic/'s standards.

>> No.4103793

>>4103779
>>4103772
>>4103769
>no arguments
>r-retard! b-braindead!
can't even prove a so-called /beg/ wrong huh
>>4103754
willing to admit these have much better flow than in the OP.

>> No.4103986

>>4103323
Based boomer

>> No.4104220

This place is cancer.

>> No.4104270

you are supposed to READ /ic and enjoy the suffering and misery, not POST to it

>> No.4104274

>>4103647

hush roastie

>> No.4104419

>>4103666
>>4104274
Oh no, don't get me wrong, I'm okay with the art. It's not my cup of tea but I can see the appeal. It's just the expression itself being repeated on those 4 consecutive drawings of that character. I don't know. Don't take it personally.

>> No.4104487

>>4103300
>very stylized
>Literally a traced CSP model

lol

>> No.4104528

>>4103300
>unironically having this shit tier taste

Thats why I discard most of /ic/ critiques, they are just dumb weebs with zero taste and knowledge whatsoever.

>> No.4106510

>>4102883
:o

>> No.4106525

>>4103606
kek